Template for rendering an electronic form

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 7543228
  • Patent Number
    7,543,228
  • Date Filed
    Monday, June 27, 2005
    19 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, June 2, 2009
    15 years ago
Abstract
Systems and/or methods are described that enable an electronic form to be rendered using a template. The template may be independent of the electronic form's current state or instance. In one embodiment, the systems and/or methods build a rendering file to render a current instance of an electronic form using the template and a view tree associated with the current instance.
Description
BACKGROUND

Electronic forms are commonly used to collect information. One way in which to enable use of electronic forms is over a communication network, such as a local intranet or the Internet. A user may use an electronic form, for instance, through his or her network browser. The user's network browser may contact a network computer that is capable of enabling the browser to display and allow editing of the electronic form.


To enable the browser to display and allow editing of the network-enabled electronic form (a “network form”), a network computer may build a control tree when the form is first requested and in response to subsequent requests. To enable a user to interact with a form from start to finish, the network computer may receive and respond to dozens of requests. This may require the network computer to build dozens of control trees. Building numerous control trees, however, can require considerable processing and memory resources.


The network computer also traverses each control tree to provide the browser with view information (e.g., HyperText Markup Language—HTML). The network computer sends this view information to a user's browser over the network, which may require considerable time and network bandwidth. The time needed to send this information may also adversely affect a user's editing experience with the form, such as by causing the user to have to wait for his browser to receive the information before continuing to edit the form.


These problems with network forms are exacerbated when a network computer receives many requests related to the form, such as from many people using the same form. For each request, the network computer may need to build a control tree, traverse the control tree for viewing information, and send the view information to the user's network browser that made the request. This expends the network computer's resources, the communication network's bandwidth, and potentially slows each user's editing experience.


SUMMARY

System(s) and/or method(s) (“tools”) are described that enable rendering of electronic forms using a template. This template may comprise pieces of rendering data that do not depend on a state or instance of an electronic form. This independence permits the template to enable rendering of many instances of an electronic form.


In some cases the template has a representation of an electronic form mapped to the pieces of rendering data. This representation may enable the pieces of rendering data to be associated with a particular instance through a view tree. This view tree is based on a particular instance of a form and may have a structure similar to that of the representation.


This Summary is provided to introduce a selection of concepts in a simplified form that are further described below in the Detailed Description. This Summary is not intended to identify key or essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended to be used as an aid in determining the scope of the claimed subject matter.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 illustrates an exemplary operating environment in which various embodiments can operate.



FIG. 2 illustrates an exemplary stateless view template.



FIG. 3 is a flow diagram of an exemplary process for rendering network forms.



FIG. 4 illustrates an exemplary default view tree.



FIG. 5 illustrates the exemplary stateless view template of FIG. 2 and the exemplary default view tree of FIG. 4 (without showing default data).



FIG. 6 shows a network form based on a default data instance.



FIG. 7 illustrates an exemplary altered view tree showing a user's interaction with a network form.



FIG. 8 illustrates the exemplary stateless view template of FIG. 2 and the exemplary altered view tree of FIG. 7 (without showing data).



FIG. 9 shows a network form based on an altered data instance.



FIG. 10 is an exemplary process for enabling a local computer to render a network form.





The same numbers are used throughout the disclosure and figures to reference like components and features.


DETAILED DESCRIPTION
Overview

The following disclosure describes one or more tools enabling an electronic form to be rendered using a template. This template may be built and used by a local or network computer.


The template may be independent of an electronic form's current state or instance. The current instance may instead be reflected in a view tree. This view tree is used in conjunction with the template to build a rendering file by which the current instance may be rendered.


Exemplary Operating Environment


Before describing the tools in detail, the following discussion of an exemplary operating environment is provided to assist the reader in understanding where and how the tools may be employed. The description provided below constitutes but one example and is not intended to limit application of the tools to any one particular operating environment.



FIG. 1 illustrates one such operating environment generally at 100 comprising a computer 102, a communication network 104, and a network computer 106. The computer is shown comprising one or more processor(s) 108 and computer-readable media 110. The processor(s) are capable of executing the computer-readable media. The computer-readable media comprises a network browser 112, an event log 114, and other media 116. The dashed lines connected to the other media show that they may be downloaded by the computer from the network computer.


The communication network enables communication between the computer and the network computer and may comprise one or more of an intranet, like a company's internal network, the Internet, and the like.


Network computer 106 is shown comprising one or more network processor(s) 118 and network computer-readable media 120. The network processor(s) are capable of executing the network computer-readable media. This computer-readable media comprises a network form template 122 having a stateless view template 124. This media also comprises (or will later comprise) one or more view trees 126 and data instances 128, and also comprises a view module 130. Each view tree can be built to reflect renderable portions of each data instance. Each data instance comprises the data of a particular instance of the form. The data instances have hierarchical tree structures comprising a markup language, like eXtensible Markup Language (XML). View module 130 is capable of enabling a network or local computer (e.g., computer 102) to render a data instance of an electronic form using a view tree for that data instance and a stateless view template.


Network form template 122 enables data instances of an electronic form to be built, displayed, and edited. This template may comprise or be associated with script, rules determined by a schema governing the network form, and logic. The network form template comprises or has access to stateless view template 124. This stateless view template comprises rendering data (e.g., HyperText Markup Language—HTML) mapped to a representation of a network form governed by the network form template. The network form template and the stateless view template may be independent of a particular instance or change to an instance. In at least this way the templates may apply to multiple data instances 128.


Exemplary Stateless View Template


The following discussion describes an exemplary stateless view template. This exemplary stateless view template comprises rendering data usable to render multiple states (i.e., instances) of a network-enabled electronic form. The template's rendering data is associated with a view-oriented representation of the form. The view-oriented representation may be mapped to a view tree for a particular data instance. The rendering data is independent of a particular data instance. For example, a piece of rendering data may be used to render a control of a data instance even if the control's data changes. Also, some pieces of rendering data may be reused. This permits the template to comprise a smaller amount of rendering data than is needed to render an entire data instance for a form.


Stateless view template 124 may comprise rendering data mapped to a representation of a network form that is enabled or governed by network form template 122. The representation of the network form may be oriented to the views permitted by the network form. It may not comprise logic, rules, and operations. The tools enable a full or partial view of an instance of the network form to be built from the pieces of rendering data in the stateless view template. By so doing, a network computer may forgo building a data-instance-specific file having rendering data, logic, and the like (e.g., a control tree) for each instance or change to an instance.


Exemplary stateless view template 124 is illustrated in FIG. 2. FIG. 2 shows pieces of rendering data 202 mapped to a view-oriented representation 204 of a network form. The stateless view template has a hierarchical structure shown with the view-oriented representation and may be written in a markup language such as XML. The view-oriented representation 204 correlates to structures permitted for data instances of the network form. In this embodiment it does not comprise rules and logic for performing data operations and the like. It is instead directed to how instances may be viewed.


View-oriented representation 204 comprises nodes representing aspects (e.g., controls) permitted by the structure of the network form. These nodes include a root node 206a, a merchant name node 206b, a form name node 206c, a name field node 206d, a phone field node 206e, a repeating product node 206f, a product node 206g, an item identifier node 206h, a quantity node 206i, a unit price node 206j, a total node 206k, and a grand total node 206l. The repeating product node permits an arbitrary number of products, thereby permitting a user to enter information for many products. Thus, there may be “n” numbers of product nodes and child nodes of the product nodes: item identifier nodes; quantity nodes; unit price nodes; and total nodes.


The pieces of rendering data 202 comprise rendering data for static text 202a, rendering data for text data-entry fields 202b, rendering data for static text boxes 202c, and rendering data for numeric data-entry fields 202d. Each of these pieces 202a, 202b, 202c, and 202d comprise rendering data by which a browser, e.g., network browser 112, may render a portion of the data instance. Additional information may also be included that is consistent across instances, such as the text for the merchant name and form name. Thus, rendering data for static text 202a may comprise rendering data for static text generally and be associated with or comprise other information indicating that the static text for merchant name node 206b includes “Merchant” on a first line and “Seller of Quality Products for Twelve Years” on a second line, form name node 206c includes “Purchase Order”, name field node 206d includes “Name”, and phone field node 206e includes “Phone”. The rendering data for static text may also comprise a font and font size for each. Note that none of the pieces of rendering data are redundant. In contrast, each of these pieces is usable for more than one node—though this is not required.


The piece of rendering data 202b for text data-entry fields comprises renderable data for boxes of a certain size capable of received alpha-numeric entries from a user of the form. The piece of rendering data 202c for static text boxes, like that of 202a, is for presentation of text, though here inside one or more boxes.


An exemplary diagram discussing some ways in which this stateless view template may be used is described below.


Building a Rendering File at a Local Computer


Flow diagram 300 shown in FIG. 3 describes exemplary ways in which the tools enable rendering of network forms with a rendering file built at a local computer. For purposes of illustration, flow diagram 300 is shown with a set of actions by, and accompanying communications between, elements of the environment 100, such as stateless view template 124 and view module 130. The actions and accompanying communications are marked with arrows. The flow diagram is directed to these elements to aid the reader in understanding particular embodiments of the tools, and is not intended to limit application of the tools to this environment. This flow diagram may be implemented in any suitable hardware, software, firmware, or combination thereof. In the case of software and firmware, this diagram represents sets of operations implemented as computer-executable instructions.


Arrow 1 receives and communicates a user's interaction with a computer requesting to open a network form. This request may be to open a blank or default instance of a network form or a data instance that has already been edited, like a previously opened and partly filled-in form. Here the request is received from network browser 112 of FIG. 1 and is for a default data instance (e.g., a new, blank form).


Arrow 2 builds a view tree for a default data instance of a network form. The view tree may be built mapped, or in some cases isomorphic, to a stateless view template. Here network form template 122 builds a default view tree 126a based on a default data instance 128a. The default view tree is shown in FIG. 4 at 126a having a hierarchical tree structure 400.


Default view tree 126a comprises indicators paralleling nodes of the view-oriented representation 204 of FIG. 2. These indicators comprise root node indicator 402a, a merchant name node indicator 402b, a form name node indicator 402c, a name field node indicator 402d, a phone field node indicator 402e, a repeating product node indicator 402f, a product 1 node indicator 402g, an item identifier 1 node indicator 402h, a quantity 1 node indicator 402i, a unit price 1 node indicator 402j, a total 1 node indicator 402k, and a grand total node indicator 402l. These indicators parallel the nodes of the view-oriented representation 204 of FIG. 2 that have similar names.


Each view tree comprises or is associated with data for a particular data instance. Default view tree 126a of FIG. 4 comprises data from default data instance 128a. This comprised data is data that may be viewed or affect data that may be viewed. This view tree indicates that the form tailored to the default instance is one in which there are no non-zero numbers or non-default text to display in the data-entry fields and that one repeating product node should be shown. The number “1” is associated with view tree indicator 402f, indicating that there is one repeating product node. A “blank” is associated with view tree indicators 402d, 402e, and 402h, indicating that data-entry fields for these should be displayed blank. A “0” is associated with each of the numerical data-entry fields 402i, 402j, 402k, and 402l, indicating that each of these data-entry fields should be displayed with a zero.


Each view tree can be quite small. In some embodiments a view tree does not comprise rendering data, data logic and operations, and the like. It can be significantly smaller than rendering data sufficient for a browser to render an entire form, thereby making communication of a view tree quicker and easier than this rendering data. View tree 126a shown in FIG. 4 comprises a data structure capable of being read by view module 130.


Arrow 3 sends a stateless view template, such as 124 shown in FIG. 1, a view module, such as view module 130, and a view tree, such as default view tree 126a to a user's computer. The stateless view template and view module may be sent to a user's computer once, usually the first time a user selects to open an instance of a network form. For any further edits and changes to a data instance, a view tree alone may be sent. Here computer 102 receives and caches to other media 116 of FIG. 1: stateless view template 124; view module 130; and default view tree 126a.


Arrow 4 builds a rendering file by which to render part or all of a data instance of a network form. Arrow 4 may do so by traversing a view tree and a stateless view template. The stateless view template, as discussed above, comprises rendering data by which an instance may be rendered. The view tree comprises indicators indicating which pieces of rendering data should be used by indicating which view tree nodes are associated with which piece of rendering data. The view tree also comprises information indicating what else should be displayed, such as a particular number or text. Arrow 4 traverses the view tree and the stateless view template in parallel, copying rendering data from the stateless view template and building it into a rendering file conforming to the view tree.


Continuing the illustrated embodiment, view module 130 traverses stateless view template 124 and default view tree 126a. These are illustrated side-by-side in FIG. 5, showing the view template of FIG. 2 and default view tree 126a shown in FIG. 4 (without data and names). Here the pieces of rendering data 202 may be concatenated into a rendering file capable of rendering the entire data instance of the form. The concatenation in this case would be: 202a; 202a; 202a; 202b; 202a; 202b; 202c; 202d; 202d; 202d; 202d; 202c; and 202d. The structure of the concatenation is based on the indicators of the view tree corresponding to nodes of the view-oriented representation 204. These indicators show which of the rendering data pieces 202 correspond to the indicators of the view tree. In XML and HTML terms, this may be implemented by having unique identifiers in the rendering data, for example by using attributes in HTML and having a matching identifier in the data structure of the view tree.


Arrow 5 renders the data instance, such as by rendering the rendering file from arrow 4. Here network browser 112 renders the electronic form based on the default data instance. This is shown in FIG. 6. Here the information in the default view tree for certain data-entry fields being blank or having zeros is reflected in the data-entry fields of the form. Also, just one set of product nodes are shown, also as indicated by the “1” in the default view template of FIG. 4.


The default static text for merchant name node 206b, form name node 206c, name field node 206d, and phone field node 206e corresponding to indicators 402b, 402c, 402d, and 402e are shown rendered at 602, 604, 606, and 608 respectively. The default text for static text boxes of repeating product node 206f and 206l corresponding to indicators 402f and 402l are shown rendered at 616 (a-d) and 618, respectively. The default text of 616 is shown within four text boxes with “Item Id.” in the first box 616a, “Quantity” within the second box 616b, “Unit Price” within the third box 616c, and “Total” within the fourth box 616d. The rendering data for static text box 202c may be repeated four times, once for each box with the difference being the text within each box and the location of the box on a display, or with one long, rectangular box divided into four parts. These rendering data 202c are also shown rendered in FIG. 6 with text for grand total node 206l having a box with “Grand Total” at 618.


The piece of rendering data 202d for numeric data-entry fields is also rendered in FIG. 6. Rendering data 202d is mapped to each of the child nodes of product 1 node 206g, and grand total node 206l. Each is shown (by default and with no entry) at 620-1, 622-1, 624-1, and 626-1, the “−1” indicating that each of these data-entry fields so rendered are associated with child nodes of product 1 node 206g. This rendering data 202d is also mapped to grand total node 206l and is rendered at 628.


Arrow 6 receives a user's interaction capable of causing a network-dependent change to a current instance of a network form and communicates this interaction to a network computer. Here the illustrated default data instance of the form is displayed, through which a user may interact with the form, such as through network browser 112. In doing so, the user may enter data, select a control, and the like. Some user interactions with a form may not immediately require submittal of interaction to the network computer. In this case we assume that entry of a user's name into data-entry field 610, phone number into phone data-entry field 612, and product information into data-entry fields 620-1 and 622-1 do not cause a submittal of the form. We assume, however that a user's interaction entering a unit price into data-entry field 624-1 does cause a submittal.


The network browser receives the user's interactions and records them into event log 114. The user's interaction can be recorded exactly—such as selecting a particular control on a form or keying in a certain number into a certain data-entry field. The event log is then sent (at Arrow 6) to network computer 106 over communications network 104.


Assume the following user interactions lead up to submittal: a user enters his name “Benjamin T. Jorgens” and phone number “206-555-1212” into name field 610 and phone field 612; and numbers “13492”, “2”, and “13.56” into the product 1 data-entry fields 620-1, 622-1, and 624-1. These interactions of the user will alter the default data instance.


Arrow 7 creates or alters a data instance to reflect the user's interaction. Here network form template 122 alters the data instance to reflect the user's interactions recorded in event log 114. This may include the network form template performing operations responsive to the data changes and the like. Here network form template 122 performs operations effective to build a new data instance having the user's name and phone number, a total (27.12) for the first product by multiply the quantity (2) by the price (13.56), and a grand total (27.12). The network form template also builds the data instance to reflect another (blank) set of product nodes. This is an operation of the network form template adding product data-entry fields based on a user's interaction, such as when a product's item identification, quantity, and unit price data-entry fields for a last product in the form have been filled in by the user.


Arrow 8 builds a view tree reflecting an alteration to or a new data instance. Arrow 8 can build an entirely new view tree or one having just the changes made to the most recent data instance.


Here network form template 122 builds an altered view tree 126b, shown in FIG. 7. Note the added numbers from the data instance and the added indicators 702g, 702h, 702i, 702j, and 702k. These indicators reflect a change to the structure of the data instance, in this case to render and permit editing of a new set of product nodes. This exemplary view tree 126b comprises a data structure capable of being read by view module 130.


Building this view tree may require little memory and/or processing resources. It may also be smaller and more easily or quickly sent across a communication network than rendering information capable of rendering the altered data instance.


The network form template, at arrow 9, sends the altered/new view tree across the communication network to the user's computer.


Arrow 10 builds a rendering file by which to update the altered or new data instance of the network form. Here view module 130 builds a rendering file by which network browser 112 may rerender the altered data instance of the network form. View module 130 reuses stateless view template 124, traversing it and the altered view tree 126b.



FIG. 8 shows the view template of FIG. 2 and view tree 126b shown in FIG. 7 (without data and names). Here the pieces of rendering data 202 are concatenated into a rendering file capable of rendering the entire data instance of the form. The concatenation in this case is: 202a; 202a; 202a; 202b; 202a; 202b; 202c; 202d; 202d; 202d; 202d; 202d; 202d; 202d; 202d; 202c; and 202d. The concatenation is based on the indicators of the view tree corresponding to nodes of the view-oriented representation 204, thereby indicating which of the rendering data pieces 202 correspond to the indicators of the view tree. Note that the addition of another product node and its child nodes is reflected in repeating 202d four more times, one for each of the child nodes. Thus, when traversing the view tree and the template in parallel, the view module repeats the traversal of nodes 206g to 206k of the template, for the second set of product nodes in the view tree (702g to 702k).


Arrow 11 renders the form showing the alteration to the form's data instance. In the ongoing example, network browser 112 renders the rendering file built at arrow 10. This is shown in FIG. 9. FIG. 9 shows two sets of product nodes—the first with the numbers previously entered by the user and the second blank or zero. The additional product nodes of the altered data instance are reflected in the rendering file and thus the rendered view showing blank product nodes at 620-2, 622-2, 624-2, and 626-2. The other changes to the data instance are also rendered based on the view tree—the name, phone number, item identification, quantity, unit price, and total for product 1. The grand total is also rendered, here 27.12 (27.12+0).


In these exemplary embodiments, a network computer prepares files usable by a local computer to build rendering data sufficient for a network browser to render a network form. In so doing, a network computer may use fewer of its own resources and those of a communication network.


Building a Rendering File Using a Stateless View Template


The above-described exemplary flow diagram describes exemplary ways in which the tools enable a local computer to render a network form by building a rendering file using a stateless view template. The following process further describes and provides additional embodiments of the tools, including embodiments in which a rendering file is built at a network computer and then communicated to a local computer.


Referring to FIG. 10, a process 1000 for enabling a local computer to render a network form is shown. This process may be implemented in any suitable hardware, software, firmware, or combination thereof. In the case of software and firmware, this process represents sets of operations implemented as computer-executable instructions.


Block 1002 receives a user-initiated request related to a network-enabled electronic form, such as to alter or open a data instance of the form. This request may be to submit an interaction capable of altering an existing data instance. These alterations may be those that simply add data to a data instance, require a structural change to a data instance, or require performance of operations at a network computer in order to properly alter the data instance based on the user's interaction. Exemplary alterations are shown as part of the exemplary flow diagram 300 in FIG. 3: a structural alteration with addition of a second product; a data-only alteration with entry of a user's name; and a logic operation computing a total and grand total based on entry of a product's quantity and price.


Block 1004 builds or provides a data instance. This data instance may be a provided default data instance, such as 128a described above. The data instance may also be one reflecting a user-initiated request. In this case the data instance may comprise an existing data instance after it has been altered to reflect the user's interaction, such as is set forth above at arrow 7 of flow diagram 300. The data instance may also reflect the current state of the data instance by being built based on the most recent and prior user-initiated requests.


Block 1006 builds a view tree based on the data instance. The view tree is view and data-dependent; it reflects that part of the data instance that may affect how a form is rendered. Block 1006 may build the view tree capable of being traversed in parallel with a stateless view template having pieces of rendering data. These pieces of rendering data may be built into a rendering file capable of being rendered by a browser, such as network browser 112.


In one embodiment a network computer builds the view tree. This enables, for example, the network computer to receive an edit to a network form, alter a data instance to reflect that edit, and then build the view tree to reflect the altered data instance. One example of this is set forth as part of arrows 6, 7, 8, and/or 9 in flow diagram 300. By so doing the network computer may act to manage the form; this allows greater control of a form and various data instances for the form. It also permits many local computers to use the form without them having to download extensive software to manage each instance of the form. As will be discussed below, in one embodiment a local computer downloads a relatively small software module, which can be orders of magnitude smaller than all the software (e.g., network form template 122) used by the network computer.


Block 1008 builds a rendering file based on a view tree and a stateless view template. Block 1006 may build a view tree capable of being traversed in parallel with a stateless view template. The view tree and stateless view template act in conjunction to map data to rendering data.


In the exemplary embodiment above, stateless view template 124 can be capable of providing rendering data for rendering all possible instances of a network form. It also comprises rendering data mapped to a view-oriented representation of a network form enabled by network form template 122. The view tree has a parallel (but not necessarily identical) structure to that of the stateless view template effective to enable appropriate rendering data of the stateless view template to be found. This rendering data may be collected into a rendering file for rendering by a browser. The rendering file may comprise sufficient rendering data to render the entire form based on its current data instance or a portion of it. In some cases only rendering data reflecting a change from that of a currently rendered data instance is collected into a file for rendering.


In some embodiments, a local computer builds a rendering file. One such example of this is set forth as part of flow diagram 300. Here a software module at a local computer is used to traverse a stateless view template and a view tree. This software module may be quite small. This enables it to be sent to the local computer without using extensive resources of the local computer, network computer, or communication network. It may also be smaller in size that a file capable of rendering the form. Sending a stateless view template and a software module (e.g., stateless view template 124 and view module 130 of FIG. 1) once, and a view tree for each data instance change may, in some cases, require significantly fewer resources than sending a rendering file for every data instance change.


In another embodiment, a network computer builds a rendering file. In this case the network computer builds a view tree for a data instance change and, based on the view tree and the stateless view template, builds the rendering file. The resources needed by the network computer to build a view tree for each data change and, based on the view tree, build a rendering file to render the change or the whole form, may be significantly less than that required by building one or more control trees for each data change. Thus, even if the network computer builds the rendering file and sends it to a local computer, it may require relatively few resources. This permits a local computer to not download a software module or stateless view template for building a rendering file. Instead the network computer may send a rendering file capable of being rendered by a bare network browser (e.g., network browser 112).


Block 1010 uses the rendering file to render the form in the browser. In the illustrated embodiments of flow diagram 300 a local view module 130 uses the rendering file to render in the browser. In one of the embodiments described herein, the rendering file is sent by the network computer (e.g., view module 130 at network computer 106) to the network browser and is rendered by the network browser. In each case the user can then view and edit the form. With additional user interactions, the tools may re-perform blocks 1002, 1004, 1006, 1008, and 1010.


CONCLUSION

Systems and/or methods are described that enable an electronic form to be rendered using a template. The template may be independent of the electronic form's current state or instance, permitting the template to apply to multiple data instances of the electronic form. Using this template, different data instances may be rendered often with relatively few processing and memory resources. Although the invention has been described in language specific to structural features and/or methodological steps, it is to be understood that the invention defined in the appended claims is not necessarily limited to the specific features or steps described. Rather, the specific features and steps are disclosed as preferred forms of implementing the claimed invention.

Claims
  • 1. A method comprising: receiving a user-initiated request to alter an existing data instance of a network-enabled electronic form;altering the existing data instance based on the user-initiated request to provide an altered data instance;building a view tree based on the altered data instance;communicating the view tree and a stateless view template to a local computer from which the user-initiated request is received, the stateless view template comprising rendering data to render the electronic form, and the view tree comprising indicators that associate one or more nodes in the view tree with one or more pieces of rendering data in the stateless view template, wherein the view tree has a parallel structure to the stateless view template, and wherein a rendering file conforming to the view tree can be built by traversing the view tree in parallel with the stateless view template, copying the rendering data from the stateless view template, and building the copied rendering data into the rendering file conforming to the view tree.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the act of building the rendering file is performed by a network computer and further comprising communicating the rendering file to a local computer from which the user-initiated request is received.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, further comprising communicating a software module to the local computer from which the user-initiated request is received, the software module capable of building the rendering file.
  • 4. The method of claim 3, wherein the software module is further configured to build the rendering file by traversing the view tree and the stateless view template.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, wherein the user-initiated request is to alter a structure of the existing data instance.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, wherein the user-initiated request requires performance of an operation at a network computer to effectuate the altering of the existing data instance.
  • 7. The method of claim 1, wherein the act of altering the existing data instance comprises performing a logic operation on the existing data instance.
  • 8. The method of claim 1, wherein the act of altering the existing data instance comprises altering the existing data instance's structure.
  • 9. One or more computer-readable media having computer-readable instructions therein that, when executed by a computing device, cause the computing device to perform acts comprising: sending a user-initiated request requiring alteration to an existing data instance of a network-enabled electronic form;receiving a view tree based on a data instance reflecting an alteration to the existing data instance required by the user-initiated request and receiving a stateless view template, the stateless view template comprising rendering data to render the data instance, and the view tree comprising indicators that associate one or more nodes in the view tree with one or more pieces of rendering data in the stateless view template, wherein the view tree has a parallel structure to the stateless view template; andbuilding a rendering file conforming to the view tree having the pieces of rendering data that can render the data instance by traversing the view tree in parallel with the stateless view template, copying the rendering data from the stateless view template, and building the copied rendering data into the rendering file conforming to the view tree.
  • 10. The media of claim 9, further comprising rendering the rendering file.
  • 11. The media of claim 9, further comprising receiving a software module capable of building the rendering file.
US Referenced Citations (677)
Number Name Date Kind
4201978 Nally May 1980 A
4498147 Agnew et al. Feb 1985 A
4514800 Gruner et al. Apr 1985 A
4564752 Lepic et al. Jan 1986 A
4641274 Swank Feb 1987 A
4674040 Barker et al. Jun 1987 A
4723211 Barker et al. Feb 1988 A
4739477 Barker et al. Apr 1988 A
4815029 Barker et al. Mar 1989 A
4847749 Collins et al. Jul 1989 A
4910663 Bailey Mar 1990 A
4933880 Borgendale et al. Jun 1990 A
4962475 Hernandez et al. Oct 1990 A
5025484 Yamanari et al. Jun 1991 A
5072412 Henderson, Jr. et al. Dec 1991 A
5179703 Evans Jan 1993 A
5182709 Makus Jan 1993 A
5187786 Densmore et al. Feb 1993 A
5191645 Carlucci et al. Mar 1993 A
5195183 Miller et al. Mar 1993 A
5204947 Bernstein et al. Apr 1993 A
5206951 Khoyi et al. Apr 1993 A
5218672 Morgan et al. Jun 1993 A
5220649 Forcier Jun 1993 A
5222160 Sakai et al. Jun 1993 A
5228100 Takeda et al. Jul 1993 A
5237680 Adams et al. Aug 1993 A
5249275 Srivastava Sep 1993 A
5274803 Dubin et al. Dec 1993 A
5297249 Bernstein et al. Mar 1994 A
5297283 Kelly, Jr. et al. Mar 1994 A
5313631 Kao May 1994 A
5313646 Hendricks et al. May 1994 A
5317686 Salas et al. May 1994 A
5333317 Dann Jul 1994 A
5339423 Beitel et al. Aug 1994 A
5339424 Fushimi Aug 1994 A
5341478 Travis, Jr. et al. Aug 1994 A
5369766 Nakano et al. Nov 1994 A
5369778 San Soucie et al. Nov 1994 A
5371675 Greif et al. Dec 1994 A
5377323 Vasudevan Dec 1994 A
5379419 Heffeman et al. Jan 1995 A
5381547 Flug et al. Jan 1995 A
5390325 Miller Feb 1995 A
5396623 McCall et al. Mar 1995 A
5408665 Fitzgerald Apr 1995 A
5410646 Tondevold et al. Apr 1995 A
5410688 Williams et al. Apr 1995 A
5412772 Monson May 1995 A
5434975 Allen Jul 1995 A
5436637 Gayraud et al. Jul 1995 A
5438659 Notess et al. Aug 1995 A
5440744 Jacobson et al. Aug 1995 A
5446842 Schaeffer et al. Aug 1995 A
5455875 Chevion et al. Oct 1995 A
5459865 Heninger et al. Oct 1995 A
5481722 Skinner Jan 1996 A
5497489 Menne Mar 1996 A
5504898 Klein Apr 1996 A
5517655 Collins et al. May 1996 A
5535389 Elder et al. Jul 1996 A
5542070 LeBlanc et al. Jul 1996 A
5550976 Henderson et al. Aug 1996 A
5551035 Arnold et al. Aug 1996 A
5555325 Burger Sep 1996 A
5566330 Sheffield Oct 1996 A
5572643 Judson Nov 1996 A
5572648 Bibayan Nov 1996 A
5577252 Nelson et al. Nov 1996 A
5581686 Koppolu et al. Dec 1996 A
5581760 Atkinson et al. Dec 1996 A
5600789 Parker et al. Feb 1997 A
5602996 Powers, III et al. Feb 1997 A
5608720 Biegel et al. Mar 1997 A
5625783 Ezekiel et al. Apr 1997 A
5627979 Chang et al. May 1997 A
5630126 Redpath May 1997 A
5634121 Tracz et al. May 1997 A
5634124 Khoyi et al. May 1997 A
5640544 Onodera et al. Jun 1997 A
5644738 Goldman et al. Jul 1997 A
5649099 Theimer et al. Jul 1997 A
5659729 Nielsen Aug 1997 A
5664178 Sinofsky Sep 1997 A
5668966 Ono et al. Sep 1997 A
5669005 Curbow et al. Sep 1997 A
5682536 Atkinson et al. Oct 1997 A
5689667 Kurtenbach Nov 1997 A
5689703 Atkinson et al. Nov 1997 A
5704029 Wright, Jr. Dec 1997 A
5706501 Horikiri et al. Jan 1998 A
5717939 Bricklin et al. Feb 1998 A
5721824 Taylor Feb 1998 A
5740439 Atkinson et al. Apr 1998 A
5742504 Meyer et al. Apr 1998 A
5745683 Lee et al. Apr 1998 A
5745712 Turpin et al. Apr 1998 A
5748807 Lopresti et al. May 1998 A
5758184 Lucovsky et al. May 1998 A
5758358 Ebbo May 1998 A
5761408 Kolawa et al. Jun 1998 A
5761683 Logan et al. Jun 1998 A
5764984 Loucks Jun 1998 A
5764985 Smale Jun 1998 A
5778372 Cordell et al. Jul 1998 A
5778402 Gipson Jul 1998 A
5784555 Stone Jul 1998 A
5790796 Sadowsky Aug 1998 A
5798757 Smith Aug 1998 A
5801701 Koppolu et al. Sep 1998 A
5802304 Stone Sep 1998 A
5806079 Rivette et al. Sep 1998 A
5815830 Anthony Sep 1998 A
5826265 Van Huben et al. Oct 1998 A
5835777 Staelin Nov 1998 A
5838906 Doyle et al. Nov 1998 A
5842018 Atkinson et al. Nov 1998 A
5845077 Fawcett Dec 1998 A
5845090 Collins, III et al. Dec 1998 A
5854630 Nielsen Dec 1998 A
5859973 Carpenter et al. Jan 1999 A
5862372 Morris et al. Jan 1999 A
5862379 Rubin et al. Jan 1999 A
5864819 De Armas et al. Jan 1999 A
5907704 Gudmundson et al. May 1999 A
5910895 Proskauer et al. Jun 1999 A
5911776 Guck Jun 1999 A
5915112 Boutcher Jun 1999 A
5922072 Hutchinson et al. Jul 1999 A
5928363 Ruvolo Jul 1999 A
5929858 Shibata et al. Jul 1999 A
5940075 Mutschler, III et al. Aug 1999 A
5950010 Hesse et al. Sep 1999 A
5956481 Walsh et al. Sep 1999 A
5960199 Brodsky et al. Sep 1999 A
5963964 Nielsen Oct 1999 A
5973696 Agranat et al. Oct 1999 A
5974454 Apfel et al. Oct 1999 A
5982370 Kamper Nov 1999 A
5983348 Ji Nov 1999 A
5987480 Donohue et al. Nov 1999 A
5991710 Papineni Nov 1999 A
5991731 Colon et al. Nov 1999 A
5991877 Luckenbaugh Nov 1999 A
5995103 Ashe Nov 1999 A
5999740 Rowley Dec 1999 A
6005570 Gayraud et al. Dec 1999 A
6014135 Fernandes Jan 2000 A
6016520 Facq et al. Jan 2000 A
6018743 Xu Jan 2000 A
6026379 Haller et al. Feb 2000 A
6026416 Kanerva et al. Feb 2000 A
6031989 Cordell Feb 2000 A
6035297 Van Huben et al. Mar 2000 A
6035309 Dauerer et al. Mar 2000 A
6044205 Reed et al. Mar 2000 A
6052531 Waldin et al. Apr 2000 A
6052710 Saliba et al. Apr 2000 A
6054987 Richardson Apr 2000 A
6070184 Blount et al. May 2000 A
6072870 Nguyen et al. Jun 2000 A
6078326 Kilmer et al. Jun 2000 A
6078327 Liman et al. Jun 2000 A
6078924 Ainsbury et al. Jun 2000 A
6081610 Dwork et al. Jun 2000 A
6084585 Kraft et al. Jul 2000 A
6088708 Burch et al. Jul 2000 A
6091417 Lefkowitz Jul 2000 A
6094657 Hailpern et al. Jul 2000 A
6097382 Rosen et al. Aug 2000 A
6098081 Heidorn et al. Aug 2000 A
6108637 Blumenau Aug 2000 A
6108783 Krawczyk et al. Aug 2000 A
6115646 Fiszman et al. Sep 2000 A
6121965 Kenney et al. Sep 2000 A
6122647 Horowitz Sep 2000 A
6144969 Inokuchi et al. Nov 2000 A
6151624 Teare et al. Nov 2000 A
6154128 Wookey et al. Nov 2000 A
6163772 Kramer et al. Dec 2000 A
6167521 Smith et al. Dec 2000 A
6167523 Strong Dec 2000 A
6182094 Humpleman et al. Jan 2001 B1
6182095 Leymaster et al. Jan 2001 B1
6188401 Peyer Feb 2001 B1
6191797 Politis Feb 2001 B1
6192367 Hawley et al. Feb 2001 B1
6195661 Filepp et al. Feb 2001 B1
6199204 Donohue Mar 2001 B1
6209128 Gerard et al. Mar 2001 B1
6216152 Wong et al. Apr 2001 B1
6219698 Iannucci et al. Apr 2001 B1
6225996 Gibb et al. May 2001 B1
6235027 Herzon May 2001 B1
6253366 Mutschler, III Jun 2001 B1
6253374 Dresevic et al. Jun 2001 B1
6263313 Milsted et al. Jul 2001 B1
6266810 Tanaka et al. Jul 2001 B1
6268852 Lindhorst et al. Jul 2001 B1
6272506 Bell Aug 2001 B1
6275227 DeStefano Aug 2001 B1
6275599 Adler et al. Aug 2001 B1
6279042 Ouchi Aug 2001 B1
6281896 Alimpich et al. Aug 2001 B1
6282711 Halpern et al. Aug 2001 B1
6286033 Kishinsky et al. Sep 2001 B1
6292897 Gennaro et al. Sep 2001 B1
6297819 Furst Oct 2001 B1
6300948 Geller et al. Oct 2001 B1
6307955 Zank et al. Oct 2001 B1
6308179 Petersen et al. Oct 2001 B1
6308273 Goertzel et al. Oct 2001 B1
6311271 Gennaro et al. Oct 2001 B1
6314415 Mukherjee Nov 2001 B1
6321259 Ouellette et al. Nov 2001 B1
6321334 Jerger et al. Nov 2001 B1
6327628 Anuff et al. Dec 2001 B1
6331864 Coco et al. Dec 2001 B1
6342907 Petty et al. Jan 2002 B1
6343149 Motoiwa Jan 2002 B1
6343302 Graham Jan 2002 B1
6345256 Milsted et al. Feb 2002 B1
6345278 Hitchcock et al. Feb 2002 B1
6345361 Jerger et al. Feb 2002 B1
6347323 Garber et al. Feb 2002 B1
6349408 Smith Feb 2002 B1
6351574 Yair et al. Feb 2002 B1
6353851 Anupam et al. Mar 2002 B1
6353926 Parthesarathy et al. Mar 2002 B1
6356906 Lippert et al. Mar 2002 B1
6357038 Scouten Mar 2002 B1
6366907 Fanning et al. Apr 2002 B1
6366912 Wallent et al. Apr 2002 B1
6367013 Bisbee et al. Apr 2002 B1
6369840 Barnett et al. Apr 2002 B1
6369841 Salomon et al. Apr 2002 B1
6374402 Schmeidler et al. Apr 2002 B1
6381742 Forbes et al. Apr 2002 B2
6381743 Mutschler, III Apr 2002 B1
6389434 Rivette May 2002 B1
6393456 Ambler et al. May 2002 B1
6396488 Simmons et al. May 2002 B1
6405221 Levine et al. Jun 2002 B1
6405238 Votipka Jun 2002 B1
6408311 Baisley et al. Jun 2002 B1
6414700 Kurtenbach et al. Jul 2002 B1
6421070 Ramos et al. Jul 2002 B1
6421656 Cheng et al. Jul 2002 B1
6425125 Fries et al. Jul 2002 B1
6429885 Saib et al. Aug 2002 B1
6434563 Pasquali et al. Aug 2002 B1
6434564 Ebert Aug 2002 B2
6442563 Bacon et al. Aug 2002 B1
6442755 Lemmons et al. Aug 2002 B1
6446110 Lection et al. Sep 2002 B1
6449617 Quinn et al. Sep 2002 B1
6457009 Bollay Sep 2002 B1
6460058 Koppolu et al. Oct 2002 B2
6463419 Kluss Oct 2002 B1
6470349 Heninger Oct 2002 B1
6473800 Jerger et al. Oct 2002 B1
6476828 Burkett et al. Nov 2002 B1
6476833 Moshfeghi Nov 2002 B1
6477544 Bolosky Nov 2002 B1
6480860 Monday Nov 2002 B1
6487566 Sundaresan Nov 2002 B1
6490601 Markus et al. Dec 2002 B1
6493702 Adar et al. Dec 2002 B1
6501864 Eguchi et al. Dec 2002 B1
6502101 Verprauskus et al. Dec 2002 B1
6502103 Frey et al. Dec 2002 B1
6505200 Ims et al. Jan 2003 B1
6505230 Mohan et al. Jan 2003 B1
6505300 Chan et al. Jan 2003 B2
6507856 Chen et al. Jan 2003 B1
6516322 Meredith Feb 2003 B1
6519617 Wanderski et al. Feb 2003 B1
RE38070 Spies et al. Apr 2003 E
6546546 Van Doorn Apr 2003 B1
6549221 Brown et al. Apr 2003 B1
6549878 Lowry et al. Apr 2003 B1
6549922 Srivastava et al. Apr 2003 B1
6553402 Makarios et al. Apr 2003 B1
6560616 Garber May 2003 B1
6560620 Ching May 2003 B1
6560640 Smethers May 2003 B2
6563514 Samar May 2003 B1
6571253 Thompson et al. May 2003 B1
6578144 Gennaro et al. Jun 2003 B1
6581061 Graham Jun 2003 B2
6584469 Chiang et al. Jun 2003 B1
6584548 Bourne et al. Jun 2003 B1
6585778 Hind et al. Jul 2003 B1
6589290 Maxwell et al. Jul 2003 B1
6594686 Edwards et al. Jul 2003 B1
6598219 Lau Jul 2003 B1
6603489 Edlund et al. Aug 2003 B1
6604099 Chung et al. Aug 2003 B1
6606606 Starr Aug 2003 B2
6609200 Anderson et al. Aug 2003 B2
6611822 Beams et al. Aug 2003 B1
6611840 Baer et al. Aug 2003 B1
6611843 Jacobs Aug 2003 B1
6613098 Sorge et al. Sep 2003 B1
6615276 Mastrianni et al. Sep 2003 B1
6629109 Koshisaka Sep 2003 B1
6631357 Perkowski Oct 2003 B1
6631379 Cox Oct 2003 B2
6631497 Jamshidi et al. Oct 2003 B1
6631519 Nicholson et al. Oct 2003 B1
6632251 Rutten et al. Oct 2003 B1
6635089 Burkett et al. Oct 2003 B1
6636845 Chau et al. Oct 2003 B2
6643633 Chau et al. Nov 2003 B2
6643652 Helgeson et al. Nov 2003 B2
6643684 Malkin et al. Nov 2003 B1
6651217 Kennedy et al. Nov 2003 B1
6654737 Nunez Nov 2003 B1
6654932 Bahrs et al. Nov 2003 B1
6658417 Stakutis et al. Dec 2003 B1
6658622 Aiken et al. Dec 2003 B1
6661920 Skinner Dec 2003 B1
6668369 Krebs et al. Dec 2003 B1
6671805 Brown et al. Dec 2003 B1
6675202 Perttunen Jan 2004 B1
6678717 Schneider Jan 2004 B1
6681370 Gounares et al. Jan 2004 B2
6691230 Bardon Feb 2004 B1
6691281 Sorge et al. Feb 2004 B1
6697944 Jones et al. Feb 2004 B1
6701434 Rohatgi Mar 2004 B1
6701486 Weber et al. Mar 2004 B1
6704906 Yankovich et al. Mar 2004 B1
6711679 Guski et al. Mar 2004 B1
6720985 Silverbrook et al. Apr 2004 B1
6725426 Pavlov Apr 2004 B1
6728755 de Ment Apr 2004 B1
6735721 Morrow et al. May 2004 B1
6745367 Bates et al. Jun 2004 B1
6748385 Rodkin Jun 2004 B1
6751777 Bates Jun 2004 B2
6754874 Richman Jun 2004 B1
6757826 Paltenghe Jun 2004 B1
6757868 Glaser et al. Jun 2004 B1
6760723 Oshinsky et al. Jul 2004 B2
6763343 Brooke et al. Jul 2004 B1
6772139 Smith, III Aug 2004 B1
6772165 O'Carroll Aug 2004 B2
6774926 Ellis et al. Aug 2004 B1
6779154 Nussbaum et al. Aug 2004 B1
6781609 Barker et al. Aug 2004 B1
6782144 Bellavita et al. Aug 2004 B2
6799299 Li et al. Sep 2004 B1
6801929 Donoho et al. Oct 2004 B1
6816849 Halt, Jr. Nov 2004 B1
6828992 Freeman et al. Dec 2004 B1
6845380 Su et al. Jan 2005 B2
6845499 Srivastava et al. Jan 2005 B2
6847387 Roth Jan 2005 B2
6848078 Birsan et al. Jan 2005 B1
6850895 Brodersen et al. Feb 2005 B2
6871220 Rajan et al. Mar 2005 B1
6874130 Baweja et al. Mar 2005 B1
6876996 Czajkowski et al. Apr 2005 B2
6889359 Conner et al. May 2005 B1
6901403 Bata et al. May 2005 B1
6915454 Moore et al. Jul 2005 B1
6931532 Davis et al. Aug 2005 B1
6941510 Ozzie et al. Sep 2005 B1
6941511 Hind et al. Sep 2005 B1
6941521 Lin et al. Sep 2005 B2
6948129 Loghmani Sep 2005 B1
6948133 Haley Sep 2005 B2
6948135 Ruthfield et al. Sep 2005 B1
6950980 Malcolm Sep 2005 B1
6961897 Peel, Jr. et al. Nov 2005 B1
6963875 Moore et al. Nov 2005 B2
6968503 Chang et al. Nov 2005 B1
6968505 Stoll et al. Nov 2005 B2
6993714 Kaler et al. Jan 2006 B2
6996776 Makely et al. Feb 2006 B1
6996781 Myers et al. Feb 2006 B1
7000179 Yankovich et al. Feb 2006 B2
7002560 Graham Feb 2006 B2
7003722 Rothchiller et al. Feb 2006 B2
7010580 Fu et al. Mar 2006 B1
7020869 Abriari et al. Mar 2006 B2
7024417 Russakovsky et al. Apr 2006 B1
7032170 Poulose Apr 2006 B2
7036072 Sulistio et al. Apr 2006 B1
7039875 Khalfay et al. May 2006 B2
7043687 Knauss et al. May 2006 B2
7051273 Holt et al. May 2006 B1
7058663 Johnston et al. Jun 2006 B2
7062764 Cohen et al. Jun 2006 B2
7065493 Homsi Jun 2006 B1
7076728 Davis et al. Jul 2006 B2
7080083 Kim et al. Jul 2006 B2
7080325 Treibach-Heck et al. Jul 2006 B2
7086009 Resnick et al. Aug 2006 B2
7086042 Abe et al. Aug 2006 B2
7088374 David et al. Aug 2006 B2
7100147 Miller et al. Aug 2006 B2
7103611 Murthy et al. Sep 2006 B2
7106888 Silverbrook et al. Sep 2006 B1
7107282 Yalmanchi Sep 2006 B1
7107521 Santos Sep 2006 B2
7120863 Wang Oct 2006 B1
7130885 Chandra et al. Oct 2006 B2
7143341 Kohli Nov 2006 B1
7146564 Kim et al. Dec 2006 B2
7152205 Day et al. Dec 2006 B2
7168035 Bell et al. Jan 2007 B1
7178166 Taylor et al. Feb 2007 B1
7190376 Tonisson Mar 2007 B1
7191394 Ardeleanu et al. Mar 2007 B1
7200816 Falk et al. Apr 2007 B2
7213200 Abe et al. May 2007 B2
7236982 Zlatanov et al. Jun 2007 B2
7249328 Davis Jul 2007 B1
7281018 Begun et al. Oct 2007 B1
7284208 Matthews Oct 2007 B2
7287218 Knotz et al. Oct 2007 B1
7296017 Larcheveque et al. Nov 2007 B2
7313758 Kozlov Dec 2007 B2
7316003 Dulepet et al. Jan 2008 B1
7318237 Moriconi et al. Jan 2008 B2
7337391 Clarke et al. Feb 2008 B2
7337392 Lue Feb 2008 B2
7346610 Ruthfield et al. Mar 2008 B2
7346840 Ravishankar et al. Mar 2008 B1
7346848 Ruthfield et al. Mar 2008 B1
7350141 Kotler et al. Mar 2008 B2
7373595 Jones et al. May 2008 B2
7412649 Emek et al. Aug 2008 B2
7424671 Elza et al. Sep 2008 B2
7428699 Kane et al. Sep 2008 B1
20010007109 Lange Jul 2001 A1
20010022592 Alimpich et al. Sep 2001 A1
20010024195 Hayakawa Sep 2001 A1
20010037345 Kiernan Nov 2001 A1
20010054004 Powers Dec 2001 A1
20010056429 Moore Dec 2001 A1
20010056460 Sahota et al. Dec 2001 A1
20020010700 Wotring Jan 2002 A1
20020010743 Ryan et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020010746 Jilk et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020010855 Reshef et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020013788 Pennell et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020019941 Chan et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020023113 Hsing et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020026441 Kutay et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020026461 Kutay et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020032590 Anand et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020032692 Suzuki et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020032706 Perla et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020032768 Voskuil Mar 2002 A1
20020035579 Wang et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020035581 Reynar et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020040469 Pramberger Apr 2002 A1
20020054126 Gamon May 2002 A1
20020057297 Grimes et al. May 2002 A1
20020065798 Bostleman et al. May 2002 A1
20020065847 Furukawa et al. May 2002 A1
20020070973 Croley Jun 2002 A1
20020078074 Cho et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020078103 Gorman et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020083318 Larose Jun 2002 A1
20020099952 Lambert et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020100027 Binding et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020112224 Cox Aug 2002 A1
20020129056 Conant Sep 2002 A1
20020133484 Chau et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020152222 Holbrook Oct 2002 A1
20020152244 Dean et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020156772 Chau et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020156846 Rawat et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020156929 Hekmatpour Oct 2002 A1
20020169752 Kusama et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020169789 Kutay et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020174147 Wang et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020174417 Sijacic et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020178380 Wolf et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020184219 Preisig et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020188597 Kern et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020188613 Chakraborty et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020194219 Bradley et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020196281 Audleman et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020196288 Emrani Dec 2002 A1
20020198891 Li et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020198935 Crandall, Sr. et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030004951 Chokshi Jan 2003 A1
20030007000 Carlson et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030014397 Chau et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030018668 Britton et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030020746 Chen et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030023641 Gorman et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030025732 Prichard Feb 2003 A1
20030026507 Zlotnick Feb 2003 A1
20030028550 Lee et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030037303 Bodlaender et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030043986 Creamer et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030046665 Ilin Mar 2003 A1
20030048301 Menninger Mar 2003 A1
20030051243 Lemmons et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030055811 Stork et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030055828 Koch et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030056198 Al-Azzawe et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030061386 Brown et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030061567 Brown et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030084424 Reddy et al. May 2003 A1
20030093755 O'Carroll May 2003 A1
20030110443 Yankovich et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030120578 Newman Jun 2003 A1
20030120651 Bernstein et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030120659 Sridhar Jun 2003 A1
20030120671 Kim et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030120686 Kim et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030126555 Aggarwal et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030128196 Lapstun et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030135825 Gertner et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030140132 Champagne et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030142072 Lapstun et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030149934 Worden Aug 2003 A1
20030158897 Ben-Natan et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030163285 Nakamura et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030167277 Hejlsberg et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030182268 Lal Sep 2003 A1
20030182327 Ramanujam et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030187756 Klivington et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030187930 Ghaffar et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030188260 Jensen et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030189593 Yarvin Oct 2003 A1
20030192008 Lee Oct 2003 A1
20030200506 Abe et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030204511 Brundage et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030204814 Elo et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030205615 Marappan Nov 2003 A1
20030212664 Breining et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030212902 van der Made Nov 2003 A1
20030217053 Bachman et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030220930 Milleker et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030225469 DeRemer et al. Dec 2003 A1
20030225768 Chaudhuri et al. Dec 2003 A1
20030225829 Pena et al. Dec 2003 A1
20030226132 Tondreau et al. Dec 2003 A1
20030233374 Spinola et al. Dec 2003 A1
20030233644 Cohen et al. Dec 2003 A1
20030236859 Vaschillo et al. Dec 2003 A1
20030236903 Piotrowski Dec 2003 A1
20030237046 Parker et al. Dec 2003 A1
20030237047 Borson Dec 2003 A1
20040002939 Arora et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040002950 Brennan et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040003031 Brown et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040003353 Rivera et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040003389 Reynar et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040010752 Chan et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040024842 Witt Feb 2004 A1
20040030991 Hepworth et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040039990 Bakar et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040039993 Kougiouris et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040044961 Pesenson Mar 2004 A1
20040044965 Toyama et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040054966 Busch et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040059754 Barghout et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040073565 Kaufman et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040073868 Easter et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040078756 Napper et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040083426 Sahu Apr 2004 A1
20040088647 Miller et al. May 2004 A1
20040088652 Abe et al. May 2004 A1
20040093596 Koyano May 2004 A1
20040107367 Kisters Jun 2004 A1
20040117769 Lauzon et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040123277 Schrader et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040146199 Berkner et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040148178 Brain Jul 2004 A1
20040163041 Engel Aug 2004 A1
20040172442 Ripley Sep 2004 A1
20040181711 Johnson et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040186762 Beaven et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040189708 Larcheveque et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040189716 Paoli et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040194035 Chakraborty Sep 2004 A1
20040205473 Fisher et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040205525 Murren et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040205534 Koelle Oct 2004 A1
20040205571 Adler et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040205592 Huang Oct 2004 A1
20040205605 Adler et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040205653 Hadfield et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040205671 Sukehiro et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040210599 Friedman et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040210645 Kouznetsov et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040221238 Cifra et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040221245 Chickles et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040237030 Malkin Nov 2004 A1
20040260593 Abraham-Fuchs et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040261019 Imamura et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040268229 Paoli et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050004893 Sangroniz Jan 2005 A1
20050005248 Rockey et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050015279 Rucker Jan 2005 A1
20050015732 Vedula et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050022115 Baumgartner et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050027757 Kiessig et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050028073 Henry et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050033728 James Feb 2005 A1
20050038711 Marlelo Feb 2005 A1
20050055627 Lloyd et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050060324 Johnson et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050060721 Choudhary et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050065933 Goering Mar 2005 A1
20050065936 Goering Mar 2005 A1
20050066287 Tattrie et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050071752 Marlatt Mar 2005 A1
20050076049 Qubti et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050091285 Krishnan et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050091305 Lange et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050097536 Bernstein et al. May 2005 A1
20050102370 Lin et al. May 2005 A1
20050102612 Allan et al. May 2005 A1
20050108104 Woo May 2005 A1
20050108624 Carrier May 2005 A1
20050114757 Sahota et al. May 2005 A1
20050132043 Wang et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050132196 Dietl Jun 2005 A1
20050138031 Wefers Jun 2005 A1
20050138086 Pecht-Seibert Jun 2005 A1
20050138539 Bravery et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050149375 Wefers Jul 2005 A1
20050160398 Bjornson et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050171746 Thalhammer-Reyero Aug 2005 A1
20050198086 Moore et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050198125 Beck et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050198247 Perry et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050210263 Levas et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050223063 Chang et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050223320 Brintzenhofe et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050246304 Knight et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050262112 Moore Nov 2005 A1
20050268222 Cheng Dec 2005 A1
20060020586 Prompt et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060026534 Ruthfield et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060031757 Vincent, III Feb 2006 A9
20060036995 Chickles et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060041838 Khan Feb 2006 A1
20060059107 Elmore et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060059434 Boss et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060069605 Hatoun Mar 2006 A1
20060069985 Friedman et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060080657 Goodman Apr 2006 A1
20060085409 Rys et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060101037 Brill et al. May 2006 A1
20060101051 Carr et al. May 2006 A1
20060129583 Catorcini et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060129978 Abriani et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060143220 Spencer, Jr. Jun 2006 A1
20060161559 Bordawekar et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060173865 Fong Aug 2006 A1
20060200754 Kablesh et al. Sep 2006 A1
20070036433 Teutsch Feb 2007 A1
20070050719 Lui et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070061467 Essey Mar 2007 A1
20070061706 Cupala Mar 2007 A1
20070074106 Ardeleanu Mar 2007 A1
20070094589 Paoli Apr 2007 A1
20070100877 Paoli May 2007 A1
20070101280 Paoli May 2007 A1
20070118803 Walker et al. May 2007 A1
20070130504 Betancourt et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070186157 Walker et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070208606 MacKay et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070208769 Boehm et al. Sep 2007 A1
20080028340 Davis Jan 2008 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (20)
Number Date Country
0841615 Nov 1999 EP
0961197 Dec 1999 EP
1076290 Feb 2001 EP
1221661 Jul 2002 EP
63085960 Apr 1988 JP
401173140 Jul 1989 JP
4225466 Aug 1992 JP
5314152 Nov 1993 JP
406014105 Jan 1994 JP
6139241 May 1994 JP
6180697 Jun 1994 JP
6180698 Jun 1994 JP
3191429 Jan 2000 JP
2000132436 May 2000 JP
2002183652 Jun 2002 JP
2003173288 Jun 2003 JP
WO 9924945 May 1999 WO
WO 9956207 Nov 1999 WO
WO0157720 Nov 2000 WO
WO 0144934 Jun 2001 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20060294451 A1 Dec 2006 US