This invention relates, generally, to sports exercise equipment. More specifically, it relates to a device that exercises muscles and improves performance in sports that require swinging an apparatus, e.g., racquet sports such as tennis, badminton, squash, and racquetball, among others.
Sports training devices are known in the art for aiding in the swinging motion of a piece of sporting equipment, such as a baseball bat. However, they fail to teach or suggest a mechanism that allows a range of motion with adjustable resistance levels, without becoming entangled around the shaft of the club, bat, stick, or racquet.
Examples of such training devices are CN100518867C, CN203001843U, JP2013233193A, U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,183,526, 5,186,699, 5,501,451, 5,897,469, 7,384,344, 9,259,636, 9,539,482, 9,555,303, 9,662,524, US20040063519A1, US20060009314A1, US20100234146A1, US20100331125A1, US20140113752A1, and U520140243170A1. As can be seen in the conventional art, there are multiple training apparatuses for different swinging sports devices for providing resistance during a swing of the swinging sports device. However, when referring specifically to racquet sports, primarily tennis, there are no known methodologies for affixing a panel/chute/airfoil at a spaced distance away from the face of the racquet. For this reason, most training devices for racquet sports simply wrap the racquet head in a stretchable fabric. A disadvantage of this mechanism is the inability to adjust resistance and the inability to strike a ball while using the training device since the racquet face/strings are covered.
Collectively, previous devices have allowed for swing resistance; however, these devices must utilize a static air foil or risk becoming entangled around the shaft of the club, bat, stick, or racquet, and they only offer a single level of resistance.
Accordingly, what is needed is an improved racquet sports training device that provides an adjustable air resistance for training, regardless of their skill level or need. However, in view of the art considered as a whole at the time the present invention was made, it was not obvious to those of ordinary skill in the field of this invention how the shortcomings of the prior art could be overcome.
All referenced publications are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety. Furthermore, where a definition or use of a term in a reference, which is incorporated by reference herein, is inconsistent or contrary to the definition of that term provided herein, the definition of that term provided herein applies and the definition of that term in the reference does not apply.
While certain aspects of conventional technologies have been discussed to facilitate disclosure of the invention, applicants in no way disclaim these technical aspects, and it is contemplated that the claimed invention may encompass one or more of the conventional technical aspects discussed herein.
The present invention may address one or more of the problems and deficiencies of the prior art discussed above. However, it is contemplated that the invention may prove useful in addressing other problems and deficiencies in a number of technical areas. Therefore, the claimed invention should not necessarily be construed as limited to addressing any of the particular problems or deficiencies discussed herein.
In this specification, where a document, act or item of knowledge is referred to or discussed, this reference or discussion is not an admission that the document, act or item of knowledge or any combination thereof was at the priority date, publicly available, known to the public, part of common general knowledge, or otherwise constitutes prior art under the applicable statutory provisions; or is known to be relevant to an attempt to solve any problem with which this specification is concerned.
For a fuller understanding of the invention, reference should be made to the following detailed description, taken in connection with the accompanying drawings, in which:
In the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments, reference is made to the accompanying drawings, which form a part thereof, and within which are shown by way of illustration specific embodiments by which the invention may be practiced. It is to be understood that other embodiments may be utilized and structural changes may be made without departing from the scope of the invention.
As used in this specification and the appended claims, the singular forms “a”, “an”, and “the” include plural referents unless the content clearly dictates otherwise. As used in this specification and the appended claims, the term “or” is generally employed in its sense including “and/or” unless the context clearly dictates otherwise.
In certain embodiments, the current invention is a swinging sports exercise and training device designed for attachment to the shaft of a swinging sports apparatus, such as a racquet (tennis, badminton, squash, racquetball, paddle ball, etc.). The invention will be described and illustrated herein as applied to a tennis racquet, but it can be understood how the device can be applied to other racquet sports apparatuses as well.
Particular examples of the training device can be seen in
The drag chute may further include a rigid member disposed along the edges of the canvas. If the drag chute takes a circular/ovular shape, then the rigid member can be disposed around the circumference of the canvas, as can be seen in the figures. If the drag chute takes another shape, such as a rectangle or trapezoid as seen in U.S. Pat. No. 9,662,524, then multiple rigid members can be used and disposed along select edges of the canvas. The rigid member(s) is used to stabilize the drag chute during a swing of the racquet. Alternatively, it is contemplated herein that if a more rigid chute material is used (e.g., plastic sheet, carbon fiber, aluminum, or other similar material is used), a rigid member may not be needed.
As discussed, the device has at least two connection points on the racquet, one of which is disposed at one end/portion of the racquet head and the other of which is disposed at an opposite end/portion of the racquet head. For example, one connection point can be at a proximal end/portion of the racquet head, and the other connection point can be at a distal end/portion of the racquet head, where the connection points are diametrically opposed to each other. The term “proximal.” is used herein to refer to a relative position of a structural component being closer to a user of the underlying swinging sports apparatus. The term “distal” is used herein to refer to a relative position of a structural component being further from the user of the underlying swinging sports apparatus. The distal connection point typically is disposed near one end of the corresponding component or underlying device, and the proximal connection point typically is disposed near an opposite end of the corresponding component or underlying device. As another example, the connection points can be disposed at the left and right sides of the racquet head, where the connection points are also diametrically opposed to each other. It can be understood that rather than the connection points being exactly “diametrically opposed” to each other, the connection points can be generally opposed to each other on one side of the racquet head. Yet another embodiment can include more than two connection points spaced apart around the frame of the racquet head. These general configurations will become clearer as this specification continues.
Structurally, these connection points can be formed between the annular/ovular frame of the racquet head and a coupling mechanism secured to the drag chute. Examples of such a coupling mechanism include, but are not limited to, pipe clips, snap clamps, clasps, hasps, catches, hooks, buckles or any other suitable mechanism that can be used to accomplish the function and structural configuration described herein. This coupling mechanism typically has a diameter or inner dimension that is larger than a width or outer dimension of the racquet frame. As such, the coupling mechanism of the training device can be easily connected to the frame of the racquet by positioning the coupling mechanism around the racquet frame. An example of the coupling mechanism taking the form of a clip can be seen in
Alternatively, the coupling mechanism can take the form of a bracket, such as an L- or U-shaped bracket, as seen in
When the training device is installed on the racquet, in order to couple the distal end of the racquet to the training device, the upper/distal bracket coupling mechanism extends from the distal end of the drag chute (creating the spaced distance between the chute and racquet strings), through a gap in the racquet strings, and upward/distally beyond the top/distal edge of the racquet head. Similarly, the lower/proximal bracket coupling mechanism extends from the proximal end of the drag chute (creating the spaced distance between the chute and racquet strings), through a gap in the racquet strings, and downward/proximally beyond the bottom/proximal edge of the racquet head. Through this structure, the racquet is securely coupled to the training device, such that the training device will remain in place on the racquet during a swing thereof.
It is understood herein that not all racquets have the same head size, either in length or width, though most head sizes are between about 85 in2 and about 135 in2, with most of these being between about 95 in2 and about 110 in2. Thus, if the brackets can have a distance between them of about twelve (12) inches or more, then this distance would be larger than a vast majority of racquet head lengths. In this scenario, to install the training device on the racquet head, the distance between the brackets would need to be decreased for example by compressing the lower bracket toward the upper bracket (or vice versa) This compression can be achieved by utilizing a coil spring that is biased toward a position of expansion. When the spring is compressed, the lower bracket can move toward the upper bracket until the bracket can be inserted through a gap in the racquet strings and be secured to the racquet frame. Further, the upper bracket would be similarly positioned at the distal end of the racquet frame. In this case, the upper bracket would exert an upward force on an inner surface of the distal racquet head frame, and the lower bracket would exert a downward force on an inner surface of the proximal racquet head frame.
It can be understood by one of ordinary skill in the art that the general mechanism of fitting the training device to various-sized racquet heads can be accomplished in a variety of manners. For example, rather than the distance between the brackets being larger than the maximum length of a racquet head, the distance can be smaller than the minimum length of a racquet head, and a coil spring biased toward compression can be used to expand the distance between the brackets. A clip or other mechanism can then be used to secure the training device to the racquet frame, where forces are exerted inwardly on the outer surfaces of the racquet frame.
The training device may further include a longitudinal support rod disposed between the upper and lower coupling mechanisms. The longitudinal support rod may also be directly connected to the upper and lower coupling mechanisms to maintain the distance therebetween and to maintain stability of the chute during a swing of the racquet.
The figures depict the previously-discussed spring on the exterior of the proximal end of the longitudinal support rod. In other embodiments, the spring can be positioned within an interior of the support rod (not shown). In this case, two rods would be disposed along the training device, rather than just one. The rods would include a smaller rod/tube and a larger rod/tube, where the spring would fit inside the larger tube. The smaller tube would then be inserted into the larger tube and would contact the spring. The spring can then perform the same function as discussed previously but would be internally located, so as to not be exposed to the external environment.
In certain embodiments, the current invention provides for adjustable resistance experienced by a user swinging the racquet. In this case, the upper and lower coupling mechanisms may not be attached to the drag chute at all. Rather, the training device may further include a transverse support rod extending between two opposing sides of the drag chute, where the transverse support rod is disposed substantially parallel to the longitudinal support rod. The transverse support rod is secured to the drag chute on each side using transverse coupling mechanisms; this can be accomplished in any suitable manner, for example clamps.
To provide adjustability of resistance, the transverse coupling mechanisms, the transverse support rod, and the drag chute are slidable along the longitudinal support rod in the direction indicated by the arrows in
Yet another example, depicted in the figures, is an aperture disposed within the transverse support rod with the longitudinal support rod extending therethrough, such that the transverse rod can slide up and down the length of the longitudinal support rod. In this way, the transverse coupling mechanisms, the transverse support rod, and the drag chute slide in unison along the longitudinal support rod. It should be noted that as the drag chute (along with the transverse support rod) moves distally, including beyond the distal end of the racquet head, drag resistance experienced by the user increases. As the drag chute (along with the transverse support rod) moves proximally, including beyond the proximal end of the racquet head, drag resistance experienced by the user decreases.
Although resistance is adjustable, a user may wish for the resistance to be fixed while swinging the racquet or otherwise during a practice session. Any suitable mechanism can be used to secure or lock the transverse support rod in place, thus also locking the drag chute in place. When the transverse support rod is not slidable along the longitudinal support rod, it is fixed in place and the training device can be used. When the transverse support rod is unsecured or unlocked from the longitudinal support rod, it can slide along the longitudinal support rod until the desired resistance is set, at which point it can be locked again. As shown in the figures, a locking knob/pin can be used to lock and unlock the transverse support rod.
In an alternative embodiment, shown in
Chute: This term is used herein to refer to a typically flexible panel or airfoil that provides air resistance when swinging it in a direction normal to its plane.
Coupling Mechanism: This term is used herein to refer to a structural component by which the current training device remains adjoined to the swinging sports apparatus and moves in unison with the swing of the sports apparatus.
Distal: This term is used herein to refer to a position further from a user operating the underlying sports apparatus and training device.
Locked position: This term is used herein to refer to a position of the locking mechanism where the coupling elements are longitudinally affixed to the support rod, such that the coupling elements cannot slide along the support rod.
Locking mechanism: This term is used herein to refer to a structural component by which the coupling elements remains longitudinally affixed to the support rod.
Proximal: This term is used herein to refer to a position closer to a user operating the underlying sports apparatus and training device.
Rigid member: This term is used herein to refer to a structural component that provides a rigidity to an edge of the panel. This rigidity facilitates synchronized rotation of the training device about the shaft of the sports apparatus.
Sports apparatus: This term is used herein to refer to equipment that is swung during operation thereof when playing a sport. Examples include, but are not limited to, baseball bats, tennis racquets, golf clubs, and hockey sticks, among other suitable equipment.
Synchronization: This term is used herein to refer to two events occurring at the same time and with the same speed.
Training apparatus: This term is used herein to refer to any device or equipment that provides training for a particular sport or provides general exercise.
Unlocked position: This term is used herein to refer to a position of the locking mechanism where the coupling elements are not longitudinally affixed to the support rod, such that the coupling elements can slide along the support rod.
The advantages set forth above, and those made apparent from the foregoing description, are efficiently attained. Since certain changes may be made in the above construction without departing from the scope of the invention, it is intended that all matters contained in the foregoing description or shown in the accompanying drawings shall be interpreted as illustrative and not in a limiting sense.
It is also to be understood that the following claims are intended to cover all of the generic and specific features of the invention herein described, and all statements of the scope of the invention that, as a matter of language, might be said to fall therebetween.
This nonprovisional application is a continuation of and claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/559,100, entitled “Tennis Training Apparatus,” filed on Sep. 15, 2017, by the same inventors; and is tangentially related to U.S. Nonprovisional patent application Ser. No. 15/683,311, entitled “Baseball Training Device”, filed on Aug. 22, 2017, by the same inventors; both of which are incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1306915 | Klamroth | Jun 1919 | A |
2819081 | Touraine | Jan 1958 | A |
3820785 | Occhipinti et al. | Jun 1974 | A |
4183526 | Brown | Jan 1980 | A |
4576378 | Backus | Mar 1986 | A |
5100148 | Smith | Mar 1992 | A |
5165683 | Beutler et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5184825 | Ruth | Feb 1993 | A |
5186699 | Dimmig | Feb 1993 | A |
5207625 | White | May 1993 | A |
5217186 | Stewart | Jun 1993 | A |
5310188 | Hernberg | May 1994 | A |
5335918 | Rupnik et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5405139 | Gagarin | Apr 1995 | A |
5415406 | Reichenbach et al. | May 1995 | A |
5472394 | Michaelson | Dec 1995 | A |
5501451 | Slusarczyk | Mar 1996 | A |
5571048 | Kenney | Nov 1996 | A |
5803838 | DeMarini et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5865686 | MacGregor | Feb 1999 | A |
5897469 | Yalch | Apr 1999 | A |
6013013 | Wolf | Jan 2000 | A |
6238299 | Barnette | May 2001 | B1 |
6325727 | Carr | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6881156 | Phillips | Apr 2005 | B1 |
7004850 | Hong | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7118490 | Namba | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7285055 | Radle | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7384344 | Aguirre | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7497785 | Koncelik, Jr. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7762929 | Celone | Jul 2010 | B1 |
8092322 | Smallcomb et al. | Jan 2012 | B1 |
8202204 | Celone | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8409037 | Imatoh | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8905871 | Wagner et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8998740 | Corcoran et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9259636 | Bailey | Feb 2016 | B1 |
9539482 | Parnell | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9555303 | Novosel, Sr. | Jan 2017 | B1 |
9636560 | Celone | May 2017 | B1 |
9662524 | Celone | May 2017 | B1 |
10155147 | Yablonowski | Dec 2018 | B1 |
20040063519 | Liberatore | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20050215339 | Namba | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060009314 | Bilsey | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20080261730 | Mullin | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20100234146 | Mullin | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100331125 | Enday | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110009208 | Roger et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20140113752 | Westcott | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140243170 | Shiozaki | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20160074728 | Arzola | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20170355462 | Hoheisel | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20190083873 | Yablonowski | Mar 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
100518867 | May 2007 | CN |
203001843 | Jan 2013 | CN |
2013-233193 | Nov 2013 | JP |
2014075150 | May 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US17/23333 (filing date Mar. 21, 2017) dated Jun. 12, 2017; Applicant: CPY 2 LLC. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US17/23333 (filing date Mar. 21, 2017) dated Mar. 21, 2016; Applicant: CPY 2 LLC. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US17/36305 (filing date Jun. 7, 2017) dated Aug. 28, 2017; Applicant: CPY 2 LLC. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US17/36305 (filing date Jun. 7, 2017) dated Jun. 16, 2016; Applicant: CPY 2 LLC. |
Translation of Chinese Patent No. CN100518867 with a publication date of Jul. 29, 2009. |
Translation of Chinese Patent No. CN203001843 with a publication date of Jun. 19, 2013. |
Translation of Japanese Patent No. JP2013-233193A with a publication date of Nov. 21, 2013. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190083873 A1 | Mar 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62559100 | Sep 2017 | US |