This invention relates to the field of fasteners, and more particularly to hot-rolled threaded rebar bolts for use in various applications, such as but not limited to mine roof bolting technology for use with resin nuts, concrete support structure applications, or other similar support structure mediums.
U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,481,603 and 7,758,284 granted to William G. Fox (hereinafter the “Fox patents”) discloses a tensionable bolt (i.e. spiral and threaded) for use with resin nuts, and related methods, for installation in a borehole in a mine in order to support the mine from collapsing. The disclosure in the Fox patents is designed to provide support in passages of geological structures, such as mines, in an efficient, secure, and cheap way. The apparatus disclosed in the Fox patents provides a structure supporting means that is easy to use and install, does not result in protrusions from the mine support structure, has excellent tensioning/holding characteristics, has minimal tension bleed-off, and has the capability of being re-tensioned by rotation of the spiral bolt after columnar grouting. U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,481,603 and 7,758,284 are hereby incorporated by reference for all purposes.
Throughout the initial investigation of the invention disclosed in the Fox patents, manufacturing companies have found that there is not a practical method of producing the desired large quantities of bolts for the system because the bolts had to be made from standard merchant round steel bar run through cut-threading or roll-threading machines (e.g., a Landis threading machine), which produce one thread at a time by rotating the head around a stationary round bar and continuing along the shaft a defined length, usually at least 24 inches. The use of such cold-cutting and/or cold-forming processes is very slow and costly, and as such the manufacturing quantity is restricted and incapable of meeting product demand for the mining bolts at a low cost.
Bolts and screws are typically manufactured through the use of a threading process, such as machined threads, cast threads, or cold-rolled threads. In the machining process, threads are cut in a milling process on conventional or computer numerical control (“CNC”) machines. In the casting process the threads are formed by the internal surface of the casting mold. In the cold-rolling process the threads are created by rolling bar stock to form threads of the fastener through sets of two or more dies in a perpendicular orientation to the movement of one or more of the movable dies in a die set. These manufacturing processes can be costly because of the set-up and manufacturing times associated with creating specialized fasteners for various applications.
In some applications, such as the case with utilizing bolts in a mine shaft roof application, or other structural support applications, three-hundred thousand (300,000) to five-hundred thousand (500,000) bolts per month, or other amounts besides this range, may need to be manufactured to supply a single mine. This may translate into around three hundred fifty (350) plus tons of bolt stock for structural support applications in a single mine.
Different types of bolting systems and associated manufacturing processes have been implemented to either utilize standardized bolts or manufacture specialized bolts in cheaper processes that can be used in support structures. However, each invention has its own associated problems. A summary of some prior art bolts systems and processing methods are described briefly below.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,861,197 illustrates a mechanical anchor including an expansion shell and an expansion plug positioned in the shell and engaged with the end of a bar having helically extending rib segments formed on the outer surface of the bar. This bolt system is designed to employ an expansion shell as the anchoring mechanism.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,953,379 describes a method of hot-rolling full continuous threads around a bar for use in concrete reinforcing. This method is, however complicated by the mandatory employment of two sets of individually synchronized tandem mill rolls rotated at ninety (90) degrees from each other and then synchronized with each other to roll top and bottom threads, and the two side threads, thereby forming a continuous thread for the application of an anchoring or connecting member with a female thread.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,922,681 illustrates a bolt that is specifically designed to not rotate. It comprises a circular core cross-section and two rows lying opposite each other which are arranged along a helical line and form portions of a thread for screwing on an anchoring or connecting body provided with counter thread. The steps serve to improve the bond of the concrete reinforcing bar to the concrete.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,775,850 depicts particular thread forms to provide a rock bolt for use in a rock bolt system which enables the rock bolt system to have an improved performance when compared with rock bolt systems based on known rock bolts.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,886,384 B2 describes a thread form on opposing sides of a smooth bar but with the threads offset by an amount of half the thread pitch. The ribs which are so formed protrude from the bar and typically form a discontinuous thread around and along the bar. This thread form allows for the application of couplers but prohibits rotation in a set grouting medium.
There is a need for cost-effective and efficient specialized bolts that can be used in support structure applications, such as mining, tunneling, earth stabilization or construction, which can replace bolts manufactured through standard processes, but still have the same or better structural capabilities.
Embodiments of the present invention address the above needs and/or achieve other advantages by providing hot-rolled threaded rebar bolts that are cheaper to manufacture but maintain the same or similar structural benefits of more costly manufactured bolts and that can be produced in high volumes.
One embodiment of the invention is directed generally to bolts for use in mine roof support applications, or other structural support applications, that are manufactured by hot-rolling a steel bar (i.e. rebar) into a threaded bolt. This methodology would also have the secondary benefit of eliminating the material waste of standard thread-cutting schemes. In many embodiments, the process efficiently makes large quantities of specialty semi-continuously threaded bolts adapted for use with a columnar resin nut disposed in bore holes in geological structures.
The features, functions, and advantages that have been discussed may be achieved independently in various embodiments of the present invention or may be combined in yet other embodiments, further details of which can be seen with reference to the following description and drawings.
Having thus described embodiments of the invention in general terms, reference will now be made to the accompanying drawings, which are not necessarily drawn to scale, and wherein:
Embodiments of the present invention will now be described more fully hereinafter with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which some, but not all, embodiments of the invention are shown. Indeed, the invention may be embodied in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein; rather, these embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will satisfy applicable legal requirements. Like numbers refer to like elements throughout.
In some embodiments of the invention, for example, in the mining roof support applications, specialized bolts may be required to have an average bolt length of approximately forty-eight (48) inches, a preferred three-fourths (¾) inch bolt diameter, and twenty-four (24) inches of thread. These dimensions are provided merely as an example, and it is to be understood that in other embodiments of the invention the dimensional requirements of the bolt may be less or greater than the dimensions provided herein. However, in the mining roof support applications twenty-four (24) inches of thread may be the minimum acceptable thread length for use with a resin nut.
There are a number of issues associated with bolts that are currently available for use in mine roof support structures and other structural support applications, such as but not limited to, the costs of manufacturing the support system, assembling the system, lack of ability to tension the bolts at any time, etc. The difficulty in manufacturing relates to producing bolts of the size necessary for use in structural supports in large quantities through milling operations or perpendicular rolling operations.
Hot-rolling steel into rebar may be known in the art, but the rebar that is currently produced through a hot-rolling process is not satisfactory for use in threaded installations for mine roof support applications, or other structural support applications, without performing additional process that create the threaded portion of the rebar. For example, standard rebar is designed to hold and reinforce concrete. This type of rebar typically has longitudinal ribs on opposing sides of the bar that prevent rotation after grout (i.e. concrete, resin, etc.) sets. The longitudinal ribs make it unsuitable to double as a tensioning bolt as described in the Fox patents. In addition, rebar has cross-hatching ribs or other rolled-on patterns to prevent rotation and for stabilization after the grout sets, as well as having manufacturer identifiers and/or product identifiers, which all may be rolled into the rebar, thus, making the rebar unsuitable for use as a tensioning bolt of the type described herein. These configurations result in support structures that are permanently fixed, thus, preventing the bolt from being rotated and tightened in the future to increase the tension of the bolt. In these systems the entire support system would have to be replaced when a tensioning problem arises with the permanently fixed bolts.
Using other types of threading equipment may not be practical from a cost or design perspective. For example, using high-speed flat-die or cylindrical-die threading equipment, which are comprised of flat-die or cylindrical-die threaders, may not be useful for rolling the thread pattern into common merchant round steel bar to produce a bolt with twenty-four (24) inches of threads because of the high costs associated with this process and extreme forces necessary to perform the roll-threading action. The flat-die or cylindrical-die threading manufacturing process for a 24″ thread would require a massive piece of equipment that used very large and expensive dies, which, if even feasible, would be quite costly to replace. Moreover, this process would require numerous machines to produce the necessary bolts in the required production quantities, each of which would be prohibitively expensive.
Specialty bolts have been manufactured using processes described above with the addition of milling steps, such as rolling rebar and machining the necessary threads or removing the longitudinal ribs by swaging, or machining the threads from bar stock, etc. However, in the case of these specialty bolts the additional machining processes add additional costs to the bolt manufacturing.
With respect to assembling, some types of bolts used in structural support applications require additional hardware, such as nuts or couplers, to screw onto the threads for external post-tensioning. The additional hardware requires preparation methods and assembly steps that increase the cost associated with these configurations that are used in mine roof support structures, as well as in other support applications.
Eliminating the need for machining the bolts, using additional hardware, reducing assembly time, and allowing for re-tensioning of bolts decreases the material and labor costs to install and fix mine roof supports and other support structures while improving the bolt's performance.
In one embodiment of the invention, the threaded rebar bolt 10 illustrated in
With respect to rolling bolt threads, it should be noted that, although threaded rebar can be hot-rolled in small quantities in specialized machinery, such as three or more rolling dies, multiple rolling die sets offset at various orientations from each other, etc. theses types of manufacturing processes are unrealistic for producing threaded rebar at low costs and high volume. The preferred method of accomplishing quality and quantity hot-rolling is through a steel mini-mill or a micro-mill process. Hot-rolling is typically utilized to create, rebar, merchant rounds, octagon bar, hex bar, structural steel and other shapes in mini-mills, however, the products, in the past, have been and can be, produced using blast furnaces. Mini-mill technology, incorporating the melting of scrap metal, has generally made production of many of these products impractical and cost-prohibitive in major basic iron-ore steel mills.
Basic mini-mill technology includes melting and alloying of scrap metals to meet metallurgical specifications for a given product. This molten steel is then poured into ingots (a batch process) or formed into billets (a continuous process, now almost always employed) that are later reheated and rolled through a progression of reducing mill and finishing mill roll-stands. The end product can then be coiled into a continuous strand or cut into standard lengths as requested by the purchaser.
The longitudinal area 30 where there are no longitudinal ribs may be approximately 0.110 wide. The first thread set 16 and second thread set 18 may each cover approximately 163.2 degrees of the core 40 of the shaft 12, meaning the areas of the core 40 that are not covered by a thread in between the first thread set 16 and second thread set 18 may only span approximately 16.8 degrees of the core 40. In some embodiments, of the invention the threads within both the first thread set 16 and the second thread set 18 are aligned such that there is an approximately 0.250 inch gap between the threads within each thread set. Furthermore, the first thread set 16 is aligned with the second thread set 18, such that the first thread set 16 and the second thread set 18 forms a semi-continuous thread that may be used to cut channels in grout that is hardening around the threads of the shaft 12, as further described within the Fox patents.
The pitch of the threads may be most efficient and effective at approximately two and one-half (2½) threads per inch on a three-quarters (¾) of an inch round-bar as compared to a typical three-quarters (¾) of an inch standard bolt with 10 threads per inch. Therefore, the threads per-inch to outer thread diameter ratio is approximately 3.333. In other embodiments of the invention the ratio may be approximately 2.5 to 4. In other embodiments of the invention, the thread pitch angle may be approximately twenty four and one-half (24½) degrees.
In other embodiments of the invention the thread shaft core 40 diameter and outer thread 42 diameter may be five-eighths (⅝) of an inch, three-fourths (¾) of an inch, seven-eighths (⅞) of an inch, one (1) inch and one and one-eighth (1⅛) inch, respectively, or other diameters in other embodiments of the invention.
Once the shaft 12 of the threaded rebar bolt is hot-rolled, the individual required bolt lengths may be cut. Thereafter, tensioning heads 14 may be created on the ends of the shaft 12. For example, an end of each of the individual shafts 12 may be reheated at anytime and a head 14 may be forged on the end of each individual shaft 12. In other embodiments of the invention a head may be formed onto the end the individual shaft 12 by heating the end of the shaft 12 and molding the metal into bolt head. In other embodiments of the invention a head may be created on the end of the shaft 12 by welding a head on the end of the shaft 12, or using any other known means for attaching a head onto the shaft 12 to create a bolt. The process for manufacturing the threaded rebar bolts 10 is a dramatic improvement over existing methods, as discussed herein because no additional machining is required to create the threads after the threaded shaft is created from the hot-rolling process. In addition, this methodology also yields a more-advantageous threaded rebar bolt 10 that is threaded along its entire length, up to the tensioning head 14, which is a feature impracticable using existing fabrication methods. This in turn yields a much-improved threaded rebar bolt 10 for use with a resin nut assembly in mineshafts (as illustrated in the Fox patents), tunnels and/or other support structures.
In one embodiment, the threaded rebar bolt 10 made from the hot-rolling process is designed primarily for use with the tensionable bolt system described in the Fox patents. The threaded rebar bolt 10 is adapted to allow for re-tensioning with relatively equal load distribution onto each thread along the length of the threaded rebar bolt 10 that is incased in the resin material. The threaded rebar bolt 10 used with a resin material provides better load distribution over the threads than would be possible with a standard nut or other coupling apparatus that applies the load to a small amount of threads within the nut, for example, possibly one (1) inch or less of threaded connection length in some cases where a steel or iron nut is used. The specially designed threaded rebar bolt 10 cannot function with longitudinal ribs that are substantially the same height as the threads or non-threaded patterns, as is seen in typical processed rebar. Therefore, in one embodiment of the invention the height of the longitudinal ribs is below the height of the threads. Furthermore, the threaded rebar may form the most advantageous threads in the resin material when there are no longitudinal ribs (or the ribs are recessed below the core surface 44) along the threads that are incased in the resin because the longitudinal ribs will not reduce the depth of the resin thread when the threaded rebar is turned to form the threads in the resin nut (see the Fox patents). Additionally, the typical processed rebar may not function with longitudinal machined flats edges in place of the ribs, because the grout may form around the flat edges preventing the bolt from turning in the grout when the grout hardens. Furthermore, the flat edges reduce the area covered by the threads, and thus, reduce the load capacity that can be supported by the threads.
The process of hot-rolling provides a unique thread pattern for the purpose of direct-tensioning. The resultant threaded rebar has no longitudinal ribs or longitudinal flats along the core that could hinder rotation of the threaded rebar bolt 10 as the resin nut is forming or after it has solidified. The thread pattern is adapted for the practical applications in which it is used, rather than for manufacturer or grade identification. The resultant threaded rebar bolt 10 produced is rotatable in a resin nut as the resin sets to form the channels for turning the threaded rebar bolt 10, and requires no steel or iron nuts or couplers to tension the bolt. The threaded rebar of the present invention may have a formed head for tensioning, can provide the advantage of full-length, or variable length threads, and can allow for tensioning of the bar after the resin has solidified.
Thread pitch, height and circumferential angle of thread coverage may vary within a range that allows for rotation of the bolt bar in a resin nut and for attainment of an acceptable tension to torque ration as defined by the applicable regulatory agency (e.g. MSHA, etc.).
Furthermore, the specified hot-rolled, threaded bar can be produced in mass quantities, and thus provide an adequate supply of threaded rebar bolts 10 to meet high demand at low manufacturing costs. Finally, the threaded rebar may be produced in a wide variety of steel grades and sizes to meet the requirements for the support structure bolts in different applications.
Specific embodiments of the invention are described herein. Many modifications and other embodiments of the invention set forth herein will come to mind to one skilled in the art to which the invention pertains, having the benefit of the teachings presented in the foregoing descriptions and the associated drawings. Therefore, it is to be understood that the invention is not to be limited to the specific embodiments disclosed and that modifications and other embodiments and combinations of embodiments are intended to be included within the scope of the appended claims. Although specific terms are employed herein, they are used in a generic and descriptive sense only and not for purposes of limitation.
This application is a continuation of, and claims priority to, co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/805,277, filed on Apr. 25, 2013 and entitled “Tensionable Threaded Rebar Bolt,” which is a national stage application of, and claimed priority to, PCT/US2011/041582, filed on Jun. 23, 2011 and entitled “A Tensionable Threaded Rebar Bolt,” which claimed priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/358,355, filed on Jun. 24, 2010 and entitled “System and Method of Making a Spiral Bolt Bar, and Methods of Use”, which are all assigned to the assignee hereof and hereby expressly incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1977285 | McCleery | Oct 1934 | A |
2377980 | Surerus | Jun 1945 | A |
2821727 | Corckran | Feb 1958 | A |
3214877 | Akin | Nov 1965 | A |
3222873 | Williams | Dec 1965 | A |
3256727 | Takaishi | Jun 1966 | A |
3494164 | Rehm et al. | Feb 1970 | A |
3561185 | Finsterwalder et al. | Feb 1971 | A |
3928998 | Torres | Dec 1975 | A |
4023784 | Wallace | May 1977 | A |
4033502 | Rothchild | Jul 1977 | A |
4056911 | Tani | Nov 1977 | A |
4076163 | Grande | Feb 1978 | A |
4087898 | Linne | May 1978 | A |
4092814 | Kern | Jun 1978 | A |
4114344 | Heasman | Sep 1978 | A |
4137686 | Kern | Feb 1979 | A |
4143986 | Antosh | Mar 1979 | A |
4159633 | Linne | Jul 1979 | A |
4193283 | Bowman et al. | Mar 1980 | A |
4193686 | Klank | Mar 1980 | A |
4229501 | Kern | Oct 1980 | A |
4241490 | Edwards | Dec 1980 | A |
4295761 | Hansen | Oct 1981 | A |
4307979 | Killmeyer | Dec 1981 | A |
4313697 | Rozanc | Feb 1982 | A |
4357819 | Elley | Nov 1982 | A |
4386877 | McDowell, Jr. | Jun 1983 | A |
4402633 | Self | Sep 1983 | A |
4472088 | Martin | Sep 1984 | A |
4477209 | Hipkins, Jr. et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
4501515 | Scott | Feb 1985 | A |
4516886 | Wright | May 1985 | A |
4518292 | Calandra, Jr. | May 1985 | A |
4531861 | Kash | Jul 1985 | A |
4564315 | Rozanc | Jan 1986 | A |
4584247 | Mulholland | Apr 1986 | A |
4595315 | Gallagher, Jr. | Jun 1986 | A |
4605449 | Schummer et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4607984 | Cassidy | Aug 1986 | A |
4618291 | Wright | Oct 1986 | A |
4619096 | Lancelot, III | Oct 1986 | A |
4627212 | Yee | Dec 1986 | A |
4630971 | Herbst et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4649729 | McDowell et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4655645 | Hipkins, Sr. et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4659258 | Scott | Apr 1987 | A |
4664555 | Herbst | May 1987 | A |
4664561 | Frease | May 1987 | A |
4666326 | Hope | May 1987 | A |
4678374 | Calandra, Jr. | Jul 1987 | A |
4679966 | Yacisin | Jul 1987 | A |
4708559 | Locotos | Nov 1987 | A |
4750887 | Simmons | Jun 1988 | A |
4752159 | Howlett | Jun 1988 | A |
4764055 | Clark et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4779439 | Baldi | Oct 1988 | A |
4811541 | Finsterwalder | Mar 1989 | A |
4856952 | Shaw | Aug 1989 | A |
4858457 | Potucek | Aug 1989 | A |
4861197 | Calandra, Jr. | Aug 1989 | A |
4870848 | Kies et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4922681 | Russwurm et al. | May 1990 | A |
4946314 | Gruber | Aug 1990 | A |
4953379 | Richartz | Sep 1990 | A |
4955758 | Hyde | Sep 1990 | A |
5013192 | Scott | May 1991 | A |
5044832 | Gruber | Sep 1991 | A |
5046878 | Young | Sep 1991 | A |
5067844 | Bowmer et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5073065 | Kleineke | Dec 1991 | A |
5094577 | Clark et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5114278 | Locotos et al. | May 1992 | A |
5127769 | Tadolini et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5152118 | Lancelot | Oct 1992 | A |
5158527 | Bernard | Oct 1992 | A |
5222835 | Wright | Jun 1993 | A |
5234291 | Swemmer | Aug 1993 | A |
5282698 | Wright et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5352065 | Arnall et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5375946 | Locotos | Dec 1994 | A |
5383740 | Lancelot, III | Jan 1995 | A |
5387060 | Locotos | Feb 1995 | A |
5411347 | Bowmer et al. | May 1995 | A |
5433558 | Gray | Jul 1995 | A |
5443331 | Seegmiller | Aug 1995 | A |
5468524 | Albrigo et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5490365 | Roth | Feb 1996 | A |
5544980 | Seegmiller | Aug 1996 | A |
5556234 | Oldsen et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5570976 | Fuller et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5611190 | Van Merksteijn | Mar 1997 | A |
5626044 | Lara-Castro | May 1997 | A |
5664902 | Holdsworth | Sep 1997 | A |
5669196 | Dahl | Sep 1997 | A |
5735653 | Schiefer et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5743978 | Otto et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5763042 | Kaiser et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5775850 | Gale | Jul 1998 | A |
5791823 | Blakley et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5791824 | Radtke | Aug 1998 | A |
5851468 | Kaiser | Dec 1998 | A |
5876553 | Kaiser | Mar 1999 | A |
5882148 | Mraz | Mar 1999 | A |
6039509 | Locotos | Mar 2000 | A |
6298705 | Shore | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6390735 | Gaudreau et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6428243 | Hutchins | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6474910 | Lay | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6484471 | Steed et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6491478 | Sager et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6568056 | Sclippa | May 2003 | B2 |
6676352 | Chen-Chi | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6698980 | Mongrain | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6886384 | Gray | May 2005 | B2 |
6994496 | Mills | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7044688 | Dever et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7147404 | Spearing et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7296950 | Stankus et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7338234 | Rataj et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7481603 | Fox | Jan 2009 | B1 |
7566189 | Simmons et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7624556 | Plooksawasdi | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7736738 | Simmons et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7775745 | Simmons et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
20030012596 | Copping | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20040161305 | Simmons et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040161316 | Locotos et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20070036617 | Oldsen et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070269274 | Seedsman | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080219775 | Mercier-Langevin et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090052995 | Eriksson et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090074516 | Craig | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090136302 | Fox | May 2009 | A1 |
20100003088 | Grocholewski et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100015461 | Larsen et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100074696 | Williams | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100252953 | Simmons et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
291440 | Jun 1953 | CH |
2547875 | Apr 2004 | CN |
3108268 | Sep 1982 | DE |
10008693 | Sep 2001 | DE |
54124861 | Sep 1979 | JP |
63-286233 | Nov 1988 | JP |
03102374 | Dec 2003 | WO |
2005021182 | Mar 2005 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Necheporenko V. A. et al., “Pressure Treatment of Metals—Production of Reinforcing-Bar Steel by Two-Strand Rolling and Separating”; Steel in Translation, Allerton Press, New York, NY; vol. 29, No. 6, pp. 32-34, Jan. 1, 1999, XP000976468, ISSN: 0967-0912. |
PCT International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US11/41582 mailed Nov. 23, 2011. |
Second Written Opinion of the International Preliminary Examination Authority for International Application No. PCT/JS2011/061244 mailed Jan. 17, 2013. |
PCT International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2011/061244 dated Mar. 22, 2012. |
European Examination Report dated Feb. 27, 2015 for European Patent Application No. 11788751.3. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150376902 A1 | Dec 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61358355 | Jun 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13805277 | US | |
Child | 14852048 | US |