This disclosure relates generally to the field of tensioners for endless drive members such as chains or timing belts.
Many engines in vehicles today use a timing belt to drive certain components that require specific synchronization with the rotation of the engine, such as the camshafts which control the opening and closing of the valves to the cylinders. Tensioners used for maintaining tension in the timing belts serve a critical role, since a loss of tension in a timing belt can lead to the timing belt skipping teeth on the toothed pulleys they are connected to. This results in a loss of the synchronization between components such as the valves, with the engine. Such a loss of synchronization can result in catastrophic damage to the engine due to collisions between the valves and the pistons in some engines (those that have an ‘interference’ design), and can lead to damage even in engines that do not incorporate an ‘interference’ design.
A tensioner typically includes a base that mounts to the engine, an arm that pivotable relative to the base, and a spring that drives the arm to pivot towards the belt. Damping of the tensioner arm movement has been found to play an important role in order to ensure that the tensioner maintains contact with the belt. Without sufficient damping of the tensioner arm, sudden changes in belt tension can result the arm failing to sufficiently follow the belt, which can lead to the aforementioned loss of belt tension. Ways of achieving suitable damping have been proposed in the past, however, they typically result in an expensive tensioner, which is undesirable. It would be beneficial to provide a tensioner that has sufficient damping, but that remains affordable.
In a first aspect, a tensioner is provided for maintaining tension in an endless drive member in a belt-in-oil drive system. The tensioner includes a base that is mountable to a stationary structure and that has a circumferential wall that defines an arm pivot axis, an arm having a radially inner arm surface, and an endless drive member engagement surface that is engageable with an endless drive member, a bushing positioned between the radially inner arm surface and the circumferential wall of the base cup, and a tensioning spring. The arm is supported on the base cup via the bushing. The tensioning spring is positioned to bias the arm in a first direction about the arm pivot axis.
In another aspect, a tensioner is provided for maintaining tension in an endless drive member. The tensioner includes a base that is mountable to a stationary structure and that has a circumferential wall that defines an arm pivot axis, an arm having a radially outer arm surface, and a radially inner arm surface that defines a pulley axis that is parallel to and offset from the arm pivot axis, a bushing positioned between the radially inner arm surface and the circumferential wall of the base cup, and a tensioning spring. The arm is supported on the base cup via the bushing. The tensioning spring is positioned to bias the arm in a first direction about the arm pivot axis. The tensioner further includes a pulley having a radially inner pulley wall that is rotatably mounted to the radially inner arm surface for rotation about the pulley axis, and having a radially outer pulley wall that is radially outside the base cup and that is engageable with an endless drive member.
In another aspect, a tensioner is provided for a belt or chain, wherein the tensioner includes a base cup that is stationary relative to the engine; a tensioning spring; an arm rotationally connected with the stationary base cup through the spring; a bearing installed in an aperture in the arm, that is eccentric to a radial center of the arm; a pulley to route the belt or chain being installed and locked with an inner race of the bearing; a bushing placed between OD of the arm and ID of the base cup to provide the thrust surface and frictional torque. A washer may be provided to act as a thrust surface between the arm and the feature (e.g. a feature on the base cup) that encloses the assembly of the arm, bushing, spring and bearing within a chamber in the base cup. The spring resists rotation of the arm/bearing/pulley assembly in a load stop direction and urges rotation of the arm/bearing/pulley assembly in a free arm direction, which is opposite to the load stop direction. The tensioner may include a locking feature that retains the arm/ball bearing/bushing/thrust washer/spring assembly within the inner cylinder of the base cup. The locking feature is fastened to the base cup (pressed-in, staked, welded, etc.). The tensioner configuration is selected in such way that the high peaks of the fluctuating belt load induced by timing drive components are higher than the maximum hysteresis torque of the tensioner and low valleys of the belt load are lower than the minimum hysteresis torque of the tensioner, but the combination of the spring torque, frictional torque of the bushing and washer (in embodiments where the washer is present) and the moment of inertia of the tensioner arm assembly limit the oscillations of the tensioner arm to less than about +/−10° dynamically.
In another aspect, a tensioner is provided as immediately above, but where the pulley and bearing are omitted and the arm itself includes an engagement surface for direct engagement with the belt or chain.
The foregoing and other aspects of the disclosure will be more readily appreciated by reference to the accompanying drawings, wherein:
Reference is made to
A tensioner 100 is shown mounted to the engine 913, between the crankshaft 910 and the camshaft 905a for embodiments in which the timing belt is immersed in an oil bath (referred to as a belt-in-oil arrangement). The tensioner 100 acts to maintain tension in the timing belt 914. An idler is shown at 916 on a span of the timing belt 914 between the camshaft 905b and the crankshaft 910.
With reference to
The arm 104 has a radially inner arm surface 114 and an endless drive member engagement surface 116 that is engageable with an endless drive member (e.g. belt 914 shown in
The bushing 108 is positioned between the radially inner arm surface 114 and the circumferential wall 112 of the base cup 102. The arm 104 is supported on the base cup 102 via the bushing 108.
The tensioning spring 106 is positioned to bias the arm 104 in a first direction about the arm pivot axis Aa.
During operation, the belt 914 is driven by the crankshaft pulley 912 in a selected direction (in a generally clockwise direction in the embodiment shown in
Damping of this motion is provided by frictional engagement between the bushing 108 and the circumferential wall 112 of the base cup 102. The damping torque provided by the bushing 108 is the damping force (i.e. the friction force, shown at Fd) multiplied by the moment arm of this force (i.e. the radial distance Dd between the direction line of the damping force Fd and the arm pivot axis Aa).
It will be noted that, in some prior art tensioners, the tensioner arm has a hub, and the base cup includes a shaft that extends upwardly. The tensioner arm hub is pivotally supported on the shaft of the base and there is a bushing between them, which provided some amount of damping. The hub, the shaft and the bushing all extend into the interior space in the torsion spring, and the outer wall of the base cup defines a chamber in which the torsion spring is located. The damping force is being applied between the shaft and the hub of the arm, and accordingly, the torque resulting from the damping force is relatively small due to the relative small moment arm associated with it.
By contrast, by using the circumferential wall 112 of the base cup 102 to support the pivotal movement of the arm 104 and by positioning the bushing 108 in association with the circumferential wall 112, the damping torque that is achieved may be larger than that achieved in prior art tensioners without significantly increasing the overall footprint of the tensioner as compared to said prior art tensioners. In the embodiment shown, the bushing 108 is on the outside of the circumferential wall 112 which provides even greater torque than if it were on the inside of the wall 112.
In general, with any tensioner, a long arm length (defined as the distance between the belt engagement surface and the arm pivot axis) increases the torque exerted on the arm by the belt. However, a problem with some tensioners of the prior art is that it is difficult to generate the amount of damping that is needed to properly control the tensioner's movements as the belt tension changes. If there is not enough damping, the tensioner arm may not be able to sufficiently follow the belt during decreases in belt tension, leading to a sufficient loss of belt tension that tooth skip becomes a risk, which can lead to serious damage of the engine. In order to ensure that there is sufficient damping relative to the amount of the torque acting on the arm from the belt, some tensioner manufacturers have resorted to keeping the arm length relatively small. This restricts the amount of torque applied by the belt to the arm, by keeping the arm length (and therefore the moment arm that contributes to the torque) small. However having a small arm length is disadvantageous in that it implicitly means that a larger angular range of movement of the arm is needed to accommodate a selected amount of movement in the belt. The greater the angular range of movement of the arm during operation, the greater the change in the geometry of the forces acting on the belt through the tensioner, which renders it more difficult for the tensioner to approximate an ideal response to changes in belt tension.
The base 102 may include a cover member 118 that covers the open, distal end (shown at 120) of the base cup 102 so as to inhibit dust and debris from migrating into the tensioner 100.
The arm 104 may have a central portion 119 that rests on a shoulder 123 on the base 102 to support the arm 104 axially and to set the axial position of the arm 104. The central portion 119 has an aperture 121 (see
Advantageously, with the arrangement shown, it will be seen that the damping torque that is provided by the tensioner 100 is dependent on the hub load acting on the arm 104. This is because the friction force exerted between the arm 104, the circumferential wall 112 and the bushing 108 depends on the normal force between them, which varies with the hub load.
Reference is made to
The base 202 may be similar to the base 102, and may be in the form of a base cup that includes a mounting wall 209 that has a fastener pass-through aperture 210 therein that permits the pass-through of a tensioner mounting fastener 211 that holds the base cup 202 fixedly to the engine 913 (
The arm 204 has a radially outer arm surface 220, and a radially inner arm surface 222 that defines a pulley axis Ap that is parallel to and offset from the arm pivot axis Aa. The bushing 208 is positioned between the radially outer arm surface 220 and the circumferential wall 212 of the base 202. The arm 204 is supported in the base 202 via the bushing 208. The pulley 203 has a radially inner pulley wall 230 that is rotatably mounted to the radially inner arm surface 222 for rotation about the pulley axis Ap, and has a radially outer pulley wall 232 that is radially outside of the base 202 and that is engageable with an endless drive member (e.g. belt 914 shown in
The tensioning spring 206 is positioned to bias the arm 204 in a first direction (i.e. referred to as a free arm direction) about the arm pivot axis Aa so as to drive the pulley 203 into the belt 914. In the embodiment shown, the tensioning spring 206 is positioned in the base 202, in the chamber shown at 228 formed therein. The tensioning spring 206 may be a helical torsion spring, similar to the spring 106. A first helical end 240 of the spring 206 engages the base 202, while a second end 241 of the spring 206 engages the arm 204.
In the embodiment shown in
The bushing 208 in the embodiment shown in
A thrust member shown at 242 is provided at a distal end of the arm 204 and prevents metal-to-metal contact between the arm 206 and the base 202 during operation of the tensioner 200. A locking ring 244 is provided to hold the thrust washer 242 in place.
In the embodiment shown in
As shown in
These hysteresis curves 300 and 302 illustrate that, when the coefficient of friction increases by a factor of about 2, the tensioner arm torque remains relatively stable during movement of the arm 204 in the free-arm direction, while the torque increases by about 50% during movement of the arm 204 in the load-stop direction. This is beneficial because in situations where the coefficient of friction is higher than that which was originally conceived for the tensioner 200, the lower portion of the tensioner arm torque curve remains stable. By contrast, in some tensioners of the prior art such as some tensioners that use the spring to exert a force on a friction member that contributes to the damping torque, a change in the friction coefficient can result in a large increase in the upper portion of the torque curve but also a large decrease in the lower portion of the torque curve.
Thus it can be seen that the minimum torque applied by the arm 204 remains relatively stable even under large changes in the coefficient of friction at the damping member (i.e. at the bushing 208), and the same is true for the minimum torque applied by the arm 104 under large changes in the coefficient of friction at the damping member 108. Furthermore, it can be seen that the amount of damping in the tensioners 100 and 200 is based on the hub load, as described above. As a result, during moments where the hub load is decreasing, the damping torque drops, which facilitates the work of the spring 206 (and 106) to drive the arm 204 (or 104) into the belt 914.
By ensuring that under many conditions the minimum torque applied by the arm 904 remains relatively stable, the risk of suffering from the ‘rope-tow’ effect is reduced, which in turn means that there is less risk of the tension in the belt 914 dropping to zero which can lead to tooth skip and subsequent damage to the belt and the engine 913.
It will be noted that there are several advantages to the tensioner configuration shown in
It will be noted that, even though the arm 204 is outside of the bearing 205, the arm 204 is still relatively lightweight and occupies relatively little space axially. This is partly achieved because the arm 204 itself is generally ring-shaped, or annular, albeit with an eccentricity between its inner surface 222 and its outer surface 220. By contrast, the arms of some prior art tensioners can be quite heavy, thereby increasing their inertia and reducing their responsiveness to changes in belt tension. This low weight assists the arm 204 in being responsive to changes in belt tension.
The configuration of the arm 204, the pulley 203, and the base 202 contribute to a relatively low axial height for the tensioner 200. It has been found that, sizing the chamber 228 to provide 6.5 mm of room for the spring 206, and using an 8 mm wide 6003 ball bearing, the entire tensioner 200 can have an axial height of about 21.5 mm, and may have an eccentric (i.e. the distance between the pulley axis Ap and the arm pivot axis Ap) of 3 mm in some embodiments, or 5 mm or more in other embodiments. The damping torque generated at the bushing 208 may be sufficient to support an eccentric of 25 mm in some cases.
By providing the higher damping torque, the arm length of the tensioner arm 104 or 204 may be large as compared to prior art tensioner arms, resulting in a relatively smaller angular movement that the arm 104 or 204 extends through to accommodate a selected set of belt tension conditions. The smaller angular movement of the arm 204 permits a ‘flatter’ (i.e. less parabolic) torque curve for the spring 206, which means a generally more constant belt tension during operation of the engine 913. The high peaks of the belt load, which are induced by components engaged with the belt such as the crankshaft pulley 912, are higher than the maximum torque on whichever hysteresis curve is applicable for the tensioner 200 (e.g. curve 300), and the low valleys of the belt load are lower than the minimum torque on the applicable hysteresis curve, so as to induce movement of the arm 204. During operation of the engine 913, torques that are outside of the hysteresis curve of the tensioner 200 induce movement in the tensioner arm 204. The combination of the spring torque and the frictional torque (from the bushing 208 and any other frictional elements, such as, the thrust member 242) and the inertia in the arm 204 and arm-mounted components such as the pulley 203 and bearing 205 if present limit the oscillations of the arm 204 to less than a selected value, such as, for example, +/−10 degrees dynamically. In some embodiments, the selected value may be +/−2 degrees dynamically, This advantageously contributes to the aforementioned flatter torque curve for the spring 206.
In general, in the embodiments described herein, the tensioner arm 104, or 204, may be made from steel or from aluminum. The base 102 or 202 may be made from steel or aluminum. The bushing 108 or 208 may be made from nylon or from a material incorporating PTFE or from PTFE itself, depending on the amount of damping and wear resistance needed.
In general where the bushing is provided between the arm and a base to provide damping, the bushing may be locked rotationally with the arm so that friction is generated with the base, it may be locked to the base so that friction is generated with the arm, or it may be not locked to either, thereby potentially generating friction with either or both of the arm and the base. The frictional damping force is nonetheless generally at the circumferential wall of the base in each case.
As can be seen, the tensioner 200 can be operated without a spring support, without a pivot shaft, and without an installation shaft (a shaft that is used to adjust a starting position of the arm in relation to the base), all of which can be relatively expensive components to manufacture, thereby reducing the cost of manufacture of the tensioner 200. Furthermore, a large amount of damping is provided even when the diameter of the bearing 205 remains small. The advantages that are not related to the bearing also apply to the tensioner 100.
In general, where reference is made herein to the pulley 203, it will be noted that the term ‘pulley’ is intended to be interpreted broadly to include rotating elements with or without teeth and which are configured to engage the smooth side of a toothed belt, the toothed side of a toothed belt, or to engage a chain. The engagement between a pulley with a belt or a chain may be either synchronous (i.e. where teeth on the pulley mesh with teeth on the belt or with apertures in the chain) or asynchronously the pulley has a smooth engagement surface for engagement with the either side of the belt or with the chain.
Those skilled in the art will understand that a variety of modifications may be effected to the embodiments described herein without departing from the scope of the appended claims.
This application claims priority from U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/876,502 filed Sep. 11, 2013, the contents of which are incorporated herein in their entirety.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/CA2014/000689 | 9/11/2014 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2015/035508 | 3/19/2015 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1667117 | Ireland | Apr 1928 | A |
2002081 | Dow | May 1935 | A |
2051488 | Kottlowski et al. | Aug 1936 | A |
2054023 | McCann | Sep 1936 | A |
2196255 | Dow | Apr 1940 | A |
2210276 | Bremer | Aug 1940 | A |
3426606 | Hopkins | Feb 1969 | A |
3756091 | Miller | Sep 1973 | A |
3811332 | Brown | May 1974 | A |
3838606 | Scalise | Oct 1974 | A |
3924481 | Gregg | Dec 1975 | A |
4384725 | Nenov | May 1983 | A |
4395250 | King | Jul 1983 | A |
4515577 | Cathey et al. | May 1985 | A |
4553952 | Tangorra et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
4696663 | Thomey | Sep 1987 | A |
4824421 | Komorowski | Apr 1989 | A |
4921472 | Young | May 1990 | A |
4923435 | Kadota | May 1990 | A |
4934987 | Kadota | Jun 1990 | A |
4934988 | Kawamura | Jun 1990 | A |
5030171 | Henderson | Jul 1991 | A |
5078656 | Brandenstein | Jan 1992 | A |
5149306 | Sidwell | Sep 1992 | A |
5171188 | Lardrot | Dec 1992 | A |
5244438 | Golovatai-Schmidt | Sep 1993 | A |
5246404 | Ojima | Sep 1993 | A |
5266067 | Gapco | Nov 1993 | A |
RE34543 | Komorowski et al. | Feb 1994 | E |
5354242 | St. John | Oct 1994 | A |
5421788 | Toth | Jun 1995 | A |
5599245 | Giese | Feb 1997 | A |
5620385 | Cascionale | Apr 1997 | A |
5759125 | Berg | Jun 1998 | A |
5964674 | Serkh | Oct 1999 | A |
5967919 | Bakker | Oct 1999 | A |
6039664 | Schmid | Mar 2000 | A |
6165091 | Dinca | Dec 2000 | A |
6196940 | Lehtovaara | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6428435 | Kumakura | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6450907 | Serkh | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6524202 | Tada | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6623391 | Young | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6932731 | Kaiser | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7273432 | Schonmeier | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7285065 | Dinca | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7588507 | Ayukawa | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7637829 | Stone | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7686719 | Joslyn et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7837582 | Smith | Nov 2010 | B2 |
8057333 | Haesloop | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8083623 | Cantatore | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8672785 | Young | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8690718 | Cantatore | Apr 2014 | B2 |
20020045503 | Young | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020142872 | Tada | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020160868 | Wigsten | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20040005953 | Yonezawa | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20080058143 | Fukuda | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080176687 | Scheyer | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080287233 | Cantatore | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090176609 | Lehtovaara | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20100113199 | Pflug | May 2010 | A1 |
20100145559 | Gauthier | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100145591 | Rolando | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20110256969 | Frankowski | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120040789 | Cantatore | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20140051533 | Yoneda | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140287859 | Frankowski | Sep 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
100540946 | Oct 2004 | CN |
1959150 | Jun 2006 | CN |
101755147 | Jun 2007 | CN |
3716571 | Jan 1989 | DE |
102005002253 | Sep 2005 | DE |
102007015676 | Oct 2008 | DE |
102007031294 | Jan 2009 | DE |
450620 | Oct 1991 | EP |
1368583 | Oct 2008 | EP |
2239483 | Sep 2012 | EP |
2464893 | May 2013 | EP |
2328998 | Mar 1999 | GB |
60-52433 | Apr 1985 | JP |
2004-132390 | Apr 2004 | JP |
2004-204954 | Jul 2004 | JP |
2005-511984 | Apr 2005 | JP |
2011202778 | Oct 2011 | JP |
2001046603 | Jun 2001 | WO |
2003048606 | Jun 2003 | WO |
2007066363 | Jun 2007 | WO |
2008068782 | Jun 2008 | WO |
2008149389 | Dec 2008 | WO |
2009106180 | Sep 2009 | WO |
2011018297 | Feb 2011 | WO |
2012147957 | Nov 2012 | WO |
2013059929 | May 2013 | WO |
2013148477 | Oct 2013 | WO |
2014063228 | May 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Office Action for US14260282 dated Oct. 18, 2016. |
Office Action for CN201380055354 dated Nov. 16, 2016. |
Reporting letter for Office Action for CN201380055354 dated Nov. 16, 2016. |
English translation of Office Action for CN201380055354 dated Nov. 16, 2016. |
International Search Report, PCT/CA/2014000689, dated Sep. 11, 2014. |
Automotive Handbook, p. 78, Robert Bosch GmbH/Society of Automotive Engineers, 1986. |
Development of Simulation Model for Calculating Loads to Synchronous Drive Belt, Uchida et al. (SAE Paper 930622), Mar. 1, 1993. |
European Search Report for EP15164688 dated Oct. 29, 2015. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/CA2013/000901 dated Apr. 28, 2015. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/CA2013/000901 dated Feb. 3, 2014. |
Office Action for CN201380055354 dated Jul. 3, 2017. |
Office Action for CN201380055354 dated Jul. 3, 2017—English translation. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160215859 A1 | Jul 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61876502 | Sep 2013 | US |