This disclosure relates to tensioners and in particular tensioners that operate to tension synchronous endless drive members such as a timing belt on an engine.
Tensioners are known devices for maintaining tension in belts (e.g. timing belts) or other endless drive members that are driven by an engine and that are used to drive certain components, such as camshafts. A tensioner typically includes a base that mounts to the engine, a tensioner arm that is pivotable with respect to the base about a pivot axis, a pulley that is mounted at a free end of the arm for engagement with the belt, and a spring that acts between the base and the arm to drive the arm into the belt. The direction into the belt (i.e. the direction in which the spring drives the arm) may be referred to as a direction towards a free arm position (i.e. towards a position that the tensioner arm would reach if no belt were present to stop it). This is a direction of lessening spring potential energy. The tensioner arm in general moves in this direction as the belt tension drops. The direction away from the belt (i.e. the direction against the biasing force of the spring) may be referred to as a direction towards a load stop position, and is a direction of increasing spring potential energy. The tensioner arm in general moves in this direction as the belt tension increases. It is known that it is desirable to provide damping on a tensioner in order to assist the tensioner arm in resisting being thrown off a belt during sudden increases in belt tension which can accelerate the tensioner arm suddenly towards the load stop position. In at least some demanding applications, however, the damping that is available from a typical prior art tensioner is not sufficient to satisfactorily inhibit such an event from happening. It would be desirable to provide a tensioner that has increased damping.
In an aspect, a tensioner for an endless drive member, comprising a shaft and base that are mountable to be stationary relative to an engine, a tensioner arm that is pivotable relative to the shaft about a tensioner arm axis, a pulley on the tensioner arm rotatable about a pulley axis that is offset from the tensioner arm axis, and that is engageable with an endless drive member, a tensioner spring that is positioned to urge the tensioner arm towards a free arm position, a damping element that engages the tensioner arm and that is engaged by a plurality of axially spaced segments of the tensioner spring.
A prior art tensioner is shown at 10 in
One source of friction is between the shaft 14 and the oscillating bushing 16 (which may be termed ‘shaft-bushing friction’). In some applications the shaft-bushing friction is sufficient to control timing drive dynamics. However, sometimes more friction is required, as insufficient damping may lead to catastrophic failure of the belt and consequently catastrophic failure of the engine particularly in interference engine designs where the valves could collide with the pistons if the valve timing is incorrect. Referring to
The spring support 24 may be made of nylon or any other suitable material. The compressive force F of the spring 22 on the spring support 24 urges the spring support 24 against the tensioner arm 18, which generates friction as the tensioner arm 18 pivots and slides against the spring support 24 during operation of the tensioner 10.
The spring 22 (which may be a torsion spring as shown) generates a torque T. The spring 22 has first and second ends 23 and 25 which end in tangs that are not shown in the sectional views in
It would be advantageous to provide other sources of friction, aside from those described above in at least some situations. For example, in belt-in-oil applications the friction generated between the shaft 14 and bushing 16 is reduced due to lubrication caused by the presence of the oil. Thus an additional source or alternative source of friction is desirable. Also, in many applications it would be advantageous to be able to use a relatively longer tensioner arm (i.e. where R>3 mm). A longer tensioner arm may have better/larger take-up than a shorter arm, where ‘take-up’ is the amount of belt length the tensioner can compensate per one degree of rotation of the tensioner arm. Additionally, a longer arm permits more stable tension control. A longer arm may permit relatively easy pull-the-pin installation of the tensioner as compared to some tensioners which are complicated to install due to their use of an installation eccentric, which is an offset between the center of the shaft 14 and a pivot axis of the shaft 14 that is used to adjust the position of the shaft 14 during installation of the tensioner. Once the shaft 14 is correctly positioned, it is fixedly captured in its current position using a bolt or the like so that it does not pivot. Installation of such tensioners, however, can be complicated as noted above.
Long arm tensioners of the prior art, however, can sometimes generate too little frictional torque at the shaft-bushing interface precluding their use in some situations. In order to keep the bearings in the tensioner small (to keep costs down), an increase of the arm length can lead to a reduced shaft diameter, which in turn results in less frictional torque at the shaft-bushing interface. In an example, for a tensioner with a 30 mm inner diameter ball bearing, the ratio of the frictional torque to produced torque may be determined as follows: A 3 mm arm may be packaged with a 20 mm diameter shaft. It may have a 15 mm bearing radius−3 mm (arm eccentric)−1 mm (aluminum arm wall)−1 mm (bushing thickness)=10 mm (shaft radius). A 5 mm arm may only be packaged in the same bearing with 16 mm diameter shaft using a similar calculation as above. For a 3 mm arm, the damping ratio would be 10 mm (shaft radius)*0.1 (friction coefficient)*F (load)/3 mm (arm eccentric)*F=0.33. For a 5 mm arm, the damping ratio would be 8*0.1/5=0.16. With such a low damping ratio, the tensioner with a 5 mm arm would not be able to control timing drive dynamics in some cases. A damping ratio in the range of about 0.3 to about 0.4 may be suitable in some applications.
A tensioner 100 as shown mounted to an engine 101 in
The tensioner arm 118 is pivotable about a tensioner arm pivot axis Aa shown in
A retaining washer 135 is staked to the other end of the shaft 114 to hold selected components together. A polymeric bushing plate 137 is provided between the retaining washer 135 and the tensioner arm 118 to prevent metal-to-metal contact therebetween. The bushing 116 and the damping element 124 may together be generally referred to as a damping system 112.
In the embodiment shown in
As shown in
Referring to
As shown in
As noted above the second spring end 125 oscillates together with the tensioner arm 118. Thus, there is friction generated between second spring end 125 and the stationary spring support 124, and consequently there is the potential for wear on the spring support 124. In a belt-in-oil application this wear may be acceptable. In applications where the wire used for the spring 122 has a square cross-sectional shape, the pressure of the spring 122 on the spring support 124 is lower than the pressure exerted by a spring 122 round cross-section (since there is more contact area on the square cross-section spring). Thus in embodiments where a square (or rectangular) cross-section spring 122 is used, such as is shown in
Based on the above, it can be seen that, as compared to the embodiment shown in
It will be noted that, while the spring 122 constricts during operation and applies a compressive force on the damping element 124 it may push oil away (in a helical direction—along the length of the spring coils) from the contact area between the spring 122 and the damping element 124. As a result, the presence of oil may not cause a large reduction in friction between the spring 122 and the damping element 124. It will also be noted that, while the spring 122 may be made from a spring wire having a square or rectangular cross-section, the wire may twist by some angle during operation and thus may engage the damping element at some points along a corner of the cross-sectional shape and not along a flat face of the cross-sectional shape. This will reduce by some amount lubricating effects of any oil that is present that would reduce the friction between the spring 122 and the damping element 124.
As shown in
As noted above, all along the helical length of the spring 122, the magnitude of the oscillatory movement increases progressively along the helical length of the spring 122 from the stationary first end 123 to the second end 125 which oscillates with the arm 118. Thus each segment 127a, 127c, 127b has progressively more sliding movement with the damping element 124. While the first segment 127a has some non-zero amount of sliding movement with the damping element 124 it is relatively small and may be ignored for its impact on the overall damping provided by the tensioner 100. In an example if there are three segments 127a, 127b, and 127c and the tensioner arm 118 (and therefore the second end 125) oscillates with an amplitude of ±6 degrees, then the third segment 127c would oscillate with an amplitude of about ±3 degrees, and the first segment 127a would substantially not oscillate). In the embodiment shown in
In applications where the friction surfaces will be exposed to oil, features may be provided to assist in removing oil from them so as to reduce the risk of sudden drops in friction and damping that can occur from the presence of oil. Slits (which may be referred to as channels or grooves) shown at 186 in
Another feature that may be provided on the damping element 124 may be reductions in wall thickness 188, which may be referred to as flex joints 188. The flex joints 188 increase the flexibility of the damping element wall (shown in
In other embodiments, the wall thickness at these flex joints 188 may be about half of the wall thickness elsewhere, or it may be a different non-zero fraction of the wall thickness away from the flex joints 188.
The graphs in
The graphs in
The tensioner 100 can provide good damping even in the presence of oil facilitates its use in a belt-in-oil arrangement, as a replacement for a timing chain design on an engine. For greater certainty however, it will be noted that the tensioner 100 may be advantageous in applications where no oil is present.
While the damping element 124 has been described as being made from nylon, other materials may be used, such as nylon with a Teflon™ coating on the inner surface (i.e. the surface that contacts the arm 118) or on the outer surface (i.e. the surface that contacts the spring 122) or on both the inner and outer surfaces. The spring 122 could be coated with a low friction material if desired so as to reduce wear that might occur on the damping element 124. Materials and coatings may be selected so that damping and wear characteristics may be as desired for a particular application.
Providing the tensioner 100 which has a plurality of axially spaced segments of the spring 122 in contact with the damping element 124 permits an improvement in damping which can facilitate the use of the tensioner 100 in a belt-in-oil application and/or the use of a longer arm tensioner than is possible using some damping structures of the prior art.
While a spring 122 having 2.5 coils in helical length is shown in the figures, it will be understood that the spring 122 could have fewer or more than 2.5 coils. For example, the spring 122 could have 1.5 coils and still have ends that are 180 degrees apart angularly, and would still have two segments that engage the damping element 124. In another example, the spring 122 could have 1.25 coils of helical length and would have ends that are 90 degrees apart angularly, while still having two segments that engage the damping element, although the forces applied at the spring ends would add in a vector sum of about 1.4F in such an instance. Other spring lengths are possible, such that three, four or any suitable number of segments of the spring 122 would engage a suitably lengthened version of the damping element 124.
The above-described embodiments are intended to be examples only, and alterations and modifications may be carried out to those embodiments by those of skill in the art.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/716,894 filed Oct. 22, 2012 the contents of which are incorporated herein in their entirety.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/CA2013/000901 | 10/22/2013 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2014/063228 | 5/1/2014 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1667117 | Ireland | Apr 1928 | A |
2002081 | Dow | May 1935 | A |
2051488 | Kottlowski et al. | Aug 1936 | A |
2054023 | McCann | Sep 1936 | A |
2196255 | Dow | Apr 1940 | A |
2210276 | Bremner | Aug 1940 | A |
3426606 | Hopkins | Feb 1969 | A |
3528533 | Sacchini | Sep 1970 | A |
3618721 | Hare | Nov 1971 | A |
3756091 | Miller | Sep 1973 | A |
3811332 | Brown | May 1974 | A |
3838606 | Scalise | Oct 1974 | A |
3924481 | Gregg | Dec 1975 | A |
4384725 | Nenov | May 1983 | A |
4392840 | Radocaj | Jul 1983 | A |
4395250 | King | Jul 1983 | A |
4515577 | Cathey et al. | May 1985 | A |
4553952 | Tangorra et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
4696663 | Thomey et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4824421 | Komorowski | Apr 1989 | A |
4917655 | Martin | Apr 1990 | A |
4921472 | Young | May 1990 | A |
4923435 | Kadota et al. | May 1990 | A |
4934987 | Kadota | Jun 1990 | A |
4934988 | Kawamura | Jun 1990 | A |
5011460 | Ouchi et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5030171 | Henderson | Jul 1991 | A |
5052982 | Ouchi | Oct 1991 | A |
5078656 | Brandenstein | Jan 1992 | A |
5149306 | Sidwell | Sep 1992 | A |
5156573 | Byztek et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5171188 | Lardrot et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5244438 | Golovatai-Schmidt | Sep 1993 | A |
5246404 | Ojima | Sep 1993 | A |
5266067 | Gapco | Nov 1993 | A |
RE34543 | Komorowski et al. | Feb 1994 | E |
5328415 | Furutani et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5354242 | St. John | Oct 1994 | A |
5421788 | Toth | Jun 1995 | A |
5599245 | Giese | Feb 1997 | A |
5620385 | Cascionale et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5702314 | Schmid | Dec 1997 | A |
5759125 | Berg | Jun 1998 | A |
5964674 | Serkh et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5967919 | Bakker | Oct 1999 | A |
6039664 | Schmid | Mar 2000 | A |
6102820 | Imaharu et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6165091 | Dinca et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6196940 | Lehtovaara | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6264578 | Ayukawa | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6375588 | Frankowski et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6416435 | Szatkowski et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6422962 | Lehtovaara et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6422963 | Kurose | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6428435 | Kumakura et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6450907 | Serkh | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6468172 | Lang et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6524202 | Tada | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6592482 | Serkh | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6623391 | Young et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6857977 | Bertelshofer et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6857978 | Polster et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6932731 | Kaiser et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7273432 | Schonmeier et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7285065 | Dinca et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7371199 | Joslyn | May 2008 | B2 |
7507172 | Lehtovaara | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7588507 | Ayukawa et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7637829 | Stone et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7686719 | Joslyn et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7803078 | D'Silva et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7837582 | Smith et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7874950 | Lehtovaara et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
8038555 | Pendergrass et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8057333 | Haesloop | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8083623 | Cantatore et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8613680 | Frankowski et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8672785 | Young | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8677963 | Stoltz-Douchet et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8690718 | Cantatore | Apr 2014 | B2 |
20020045503 | Young et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020142872 | Tada | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020160868 | Wigstein et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030078124 | Serkh | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030098215 | Miller et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20040005953 | Yonezawa et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040053719 | Gibson | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040166975 | Gibson | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20060035740 | Lehtovaara et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20080026894 | Dinca et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080058141 | Pendergrass et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080058142 | Joslyn | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080058143 | Fukuda | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080139353 | Stepniak et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080176687 | Schever | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080287233 | Cantatore | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090011881 | Lehtovaara et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090131208 | Hawryluck et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090176609 | Lehtovaara et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20100113199 | Pflug | May 2010 | A1 |
20100145559 | Gauthier et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100145591 | Rolando | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20110256969 | Frankowski et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120040789 | Cantatore | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20140051533 | Yoneda et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140287859 | Frankowski et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2446188 | Jun 2007 | CA |
100540946 | Oct 2004 | CN |
1959150 | Jun 2006 | CN |
101755147 | Jun 2007 | CN |
3716571 | Jan 1989 | DE |
102005002253 | Sep 2005 | DE |
102007015676 | Oct 2008 | DE |
102007031294 | Jan 2009 | DE |
450620 | Oct 1991 | EP |
1368583 | Oct 2008 | EP |
2239483 | Sep 2012 | EP |
2464893 | May 2013 | EP |
2328998 | Mar 1999 | GB |
60-52433 | Apr 1985 | JP |
2004-132390 | Apr 2004 | JP |
2004-204954 | Jul 2004 | JP |
2005-511984 | Apr 2005 | JP |
03652177 | May 2005 | JP |
2006-170435 | Jun 2006 | JP |
2011202778 | Oct 2011 | JP |
10-20050044684 | May 2005 | KR |
0113009 | Feb 2001 | WO |
0146603 | Jun 2001 | WO |
03048606 | Jun 2003 | WO |
2006105656 | Oct 2006 | WO |
2007066363 | Jun 2007 | WO |
2008068782 | Jun 2008 | WO |
2008149389 | Dec 2008 | WO |
2009106180 | Sep 2009 | WO |
2011018297 | Feb 2011 | WO |
2012147957 | Nov 2012 | WO |
2013059929 | May 2013 | WO |
2013148477 | Oct 2013 | WO |
2014063228 | May 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Automotive Handbook (Second Edition), p. 78, Robert Bosch GmbH/Society of Automotive Engineers, 1986. |
Development of Simulation Model for Calculating Loads to Synchronous Drive Belt (SAE Paper 930622), Mar. 1, 1993, Uchida et al. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/CA2013/000901, dated Feb. 3, 2014, ISA. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/CA2013/000901, dated Apr. 28, 2015, ISA. |
Office Action for JP2013505285 dated Mar. 3, 2015. |
Office Action dated Mar. 26, 2015 for CN201180019579 (SIPO). |
Office Action dated Mar. 26, 2015 for JP2013505285 (JPO). |
ESR for EP15164688 dated Oct. 29, 2015. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/CA2011/000445 dated Oct. 23, 2012. |
ISR and WO for PCT/CA2014/000689 dated Dec. 15, 2014. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/260,282 dated Oct. 18, 2016. |
Office Action for CN201380055354 dated Nov. 16, 2016. |
Reporting letter for Office Action for CN201380055354 dated Nov. 16, 2016. |
English translation of Office Action for CN201380055354 dated Nov. 16, 2016. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/917,743 dated May 15, 2017. |
Office Action for CN201380055354 dated Jul. 3, 2017. |
Office Action for CN201380055354 dated Jul. 3, 2017—English translation. |
Notice of Preliminary Rejection of KR10-2012-7027217 dated May 18, 2017. |
Translation of the Notice of Preliminary Rejection of KR10-2012-7027217 dated May 18, 2017. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150275706 A1 | Oct 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61716894 | Oct 2012 | US |