1. Field of the Invention
THIS INVENTION relates to hydraulic systems for tensioning fasteners; to nuts to be tensioned thereby; to tools to be used therewith; to washers and to other like type structures and accessories for use therewith.
2. Prior Art
Hydraulic nuts are known. The specification to Australian Patent No. 625495 (AU-B-25403/88), to the present applicant, describes such a nut. These nuts find applications in a variety of fields, for example in the assembly of turbine casings.
Power industry turbine casings are invariably in two halves, joined axially to make an essentially symmetric shell in which the turbine rotor operates. The joint between the casings must be clamped with sufficient force to withstand the massive forces of separation generated by the action of steam under pressure within, and with a high degree of consistency to prevent leakage or distortion of the casing. Steam turbines operate of necessity at high temperatures, so the nature of the material used in the bolts must resist creep (slow relaxation) under such conditions. This rules out using particularly high-strength heat treated alloy fasteners, so the engineering solution taken is that of using studbolts of large cross sectional area at reduced separation (bolt pitch). This reduced separation means that there is very little working room around the bolts. This creates problems in applying the high torque necessary to provide required tensile load in the member. Most turbine manufacturers have, therefore, opted to recommend a practice of heat induced elongation and subsequent shrinkage of the individual studs for casing bolt tensioning. This is an extremely costly method in the amount of time consumed, and it also has detrimental effects on the integrity of the fasteners.
There has been considerable pressure applied by power generation utility companies to the manufacturers of the turbines to improve the methods used in this area. An “outage” of a baseline generator, in a nuclear plant for example, can cost a considerable sum (in excess of four million dollars) per day. There are economic reasons to improve performance. The utility companies are of the opinion that permanently installed hydraulic fasteners are the ideal method of force application for these studbolts. However, there are design changes necessary to best fit such equipment requiring manufacturers and regulatory body approvals, so they have requested an interim step which would still allow the use of hydraulic tensioning without major design change. Ideally, they would use such equipment as tools which are removed after application, and which do not require replacement of the studbolts themselves.
Following experience gained in the development of high temperature hydraulic nuts for the power generation industry, the inventor proposes herein solutions to inherent problems of tensioning fasteners which are applied in circumstances offering limited working geometries such as fasteners used in fixing turbine casings.
It is an object of the present invention to provide one or more improvements and developments which address the above issues. In particular, a preferred object of the invention is to produce an hydraulic bolt tensioner and accessories therefor which can apply high tensile forces in very confined spaces. Various other objects and particular advantages will hereinafter become apparent.
Throughout the specification, the term “studbolt” shall include bolts and other fasteners.
The invention provides, in a first aspect, an hydraulic tensioner for application with a studbolt fitted with a nut, said tensioner having, including or comprising:
a puller bar for engagement in an internal thread with the studbolt;
a puller buddy for engagement with an external thread on the studbolt and with the puller bar, to work with an hydraulic means acting via a bridge around and/or over a nut and against the puller bar to tension the studbolt.
In a second aspect, the present invention resides in a hydraulic tensioner for a studbolt or similar, fitted with a nut, extending from an article or machine, said tensioner including or comprising:
a puller bar for engagement in an internal thread in an end of the studbolt;
a bridge extending around and/or over the nut, engageable with the article or machine; and
hydraulic means between the puller bar and bridge and operable to cause the puller bar to tension the studbolt by pulling the one end of the studbolt in a direction away from the article or machine.
Preferably, the hydraulic tensioner further includes a puller buddy engageable with an external thread about the one end of the studbolt and engageable with the puller bar.
Preferably, the internal thread in the studbolt is stepped in diameter and the puller bar has a threaded end with complementary stepped external threads.
Alternatively, the internal thread in the studbolt is substantially conical or tapered; and
the puller bar has a thread end with a complementary substantially conical or tapered external thread.
Preferably, the internal thread on the studbolt and the external thread on the end of the puller bar are of tapered buttress threads.
Preferably, the shoulders of the buttress threads are at an angle of approximately 10° (to the normal to the horizontal axes of the studbolt and puller bar). i.e., the threaded end of the puller bar has a 10° taper.
Preferably, the pitch of the external thread on the puller bar is greater than the pitch of the internal thread in the studbolt.
Preferably, the pitch of the external thread on the puller bar is 100.1% to 100.5% of the pitch of the vertical thread in the studbolt.
Preferably, the pitch of the external thread on the puller bar is 3.005 mm; and the pitch of the vertical thread in the studbolt is 3.00 mm.
In a third aspect, the present invention resides in a coupling for the hydraulic tensioner of the type as hereinbefore described wherein:
the internal thread on the studbolt and the external thread on the end of the puller bar are of tapered buttress threads.
Preferably, the shoulders of the buttress threads are at an angle of approximately 10° (to the normal to the horizontal axes of the studbolt and puller bar).
Preferably, the pitch of the external thread on the puller bar is greater than the pitch of the internal thread in the studbolt.
Preferably, the pitch of the external thread on the puller bar is 100.1% to 100.5% of the pitch of the vertical thread in the studbolt.
Preferably, the pitch of the external thread on the puller bar is 3.005 mm; and the pitch of the vertical thread in the studbolt is 3.00 mm.
Preferably, the profile of the buttress type thread is that having an exaggerated thread root radius.
In a fourth aspect, the invention further provides a nut with particular attributes suited to working with the aforesaid hydraulic tensioner having, including or comprising a nut body with a substantially conical or tapered peripheral surface, an annular shell with a complementary conical or tapered recess to receive the nut body, in use, the nut body being screwed, in use, on a studbolt into the recess of the annular shell.
In a fifth aspect, the present invention provides a nut assembly for use with the hydraulic tensioner as hereinbefore described, the nut assembly having, including or comprising:
a nut body with a substantially conical or tapered peripheral surface;
an annular collar or shell with a complementary conical or tapered recess to receive the nut body, in use; and
the nut body being screwed, in use, on the studbolt into the recess of the annular collar or shell.
Preferably, the nut assembly further includes a base washer having a substantially part-spherical face engageable by a complementary part-spherical face on the annular collar or shell to enable the base washer and annular collar or shell to be self-aligning.
The invention still further provides, in a sixth aspect, a washer ideally suited for use with the aforesaid tensioner and/or conical nut, said washer having, including or comprising first and second annular means mating at a slip plane angled from the plane transverse to the axis of the washer, and removable or releasable means holding the first and second annular means against relative slip over the slip plane therebetween whilst the removable or releasable means is in place.
The invention will now be described with reference to various preferred embodiments, seen in greater detail in the accompanying drawings in which:
The prior art practice described above is mounted over the nut 11, with a bridge 18 as illustrated, the bridge 18 allowing access for rotation of the nut 11 within. Clearly, when there is little room between adjacent studs 10 and nuts 11, the bridge 18 must be thin walled, and it will apply high bearing stresses upon the joint face when operating. In practice, the nuts 11 are so close as to almost touch, which also means that the distance between the closest interference and diameter of any studbolt 10 does not allow for much annular area in the tensioner. Bolt tensioners have been constructed which have required the use of an extended studbolt to get above the spatial restrictions. If used as a replacement fitting, then all the studbolts will have to be changed and the turbine insulating covers altered at considerable cost of, in typical circumstances, $1.5 to $2 million per machine.
The above studbolt is by definition of the same strength as original equipment, so the connection with the bolt tensioner therefore cannot be reduced in diameter to allow the bolt tensioner tool to have more interior annular pressure area. This means that the tensioner is required to have several load cells (in a stacked configuration known to those skilled in the art) and even longer stud length to accommodate same. The resulting tensioners made by others in this area are therefore huge items requiring special studs with modifications to the machine and cannot be used in close proximity. They would interfere badly if used on consecutive studs.
With the aforementioned in mind, the inventor has designed the herein described hydraulic bolt tensioner and accessories which can be produced in a form which is comparatively very small, yet still provides high tensioning forces within the existing spotface dimensions of turbine casings. As a consequence, these items may therefore be used on every casing bolt simultaneously, which is a massive boost to productivity. The inventor proposes a modification to existing studbolts 10 to adapt them to this system. As best practice, the inventor proposes to replace existing nuts 11 with a companion development, a mechanical superior type nut 21 having better thread load distribution characteristics. Another particular development is a washer 24 by which the tension in a studbolt may be relieved.
A nut 20 which is proposed below may be a three-part assembly, being a fitted substantially cone shaped member 21, or equivalent; and collar-like member 23, preferably resting on, typically, a spherical base washer 24. In a preferred form (see below), the cone nut 21 may have a gear 22 cut into its outer diameter to enable or allow its rotation during tensioning (see, e.g.,
In
The above illustrates the means by which high tensile loads may be applied without damaging the threads 19a of engagement of the studbolt 19, or exceeding the spotface dimensions allowable for each size. A tensioner assembly 25 manufactured as illustrated may produce a tensile force of 50 tons/in2 on a 2″ Studbolt. The arrangement shown allows the load applied by the puller bar 33 on the inner threads 19b of the studbolt 19, and the load applied by the puller buddy 37 on the outer threads 19a to be distributed between the respective threads of engagement during tensioning. The force which can be delivered may only be limited by the tensile strength of that sectional area of the studbolt 19 which is subject to said force. This can be maximised by manipulating the actual point of application of load via inner and outer threads 19b, 19a. For example, if the inner bar were shorter as illustrated and the puller buddy 37 picked up load in full thickness of the studbolt 19 as per the illustration, full load can then be distributed across the section in a very favourable manner.
The inventor has also designed variations of the puller/buddy tensioner which do not rely on the use of the cone type nut. As illustrated (see discussion below), the operative strength of a hex nut is governed by its minimum wall thickness. The proposal here can make use of the difference in Across Flats and Across Corners dimensions of hex nuts to mount a bridge directly onto a modified spherical washer at full spotface dimensions. There may be sufficient stud protrusion above the joint to fit a Ring Nut, and after tensioning is complete, a Cap Nut can be screwed onto the top to protect the thread.
As part of a total package for Turbine Tensioning Systems the inventor has developed a device designed to replace the torch ring often used where it is considered quicker to release clamp force by cutting and removing a piece of the assembly. It is difficult to advocate the use of sacrificial parts and oxy cutting thereof around multi-million dollar hardware, so the inventor proposes the use of a “friction washer” 51 which can be released voluntarily.
The above friction washer 51 is a simple yet effective device in which the friction between the opposing faces holds the washer together as a function of the force exerted downwards by the bolt tension. As the relationship is essentially linear, then the correct slip plane angle can be determined from those inherent factors and the co-efficient of friction of the base material. It is set so that when the bolt is under tension, the capscrews will provide force just sufficient to hold the assembly together. Remove the capscrews, and apply a light blow to overcome sticking friction, and the washer separates along the slip plane. Design of the washer can be varied.
In
In
In
The hydraulic tensioning systems 225, 325, 425 correspond to the hydraulic tension system 225 of
The inventor has examined various threaded connections for the tensioner/studbolt interface, and found that the simplest configuration having the best stress distribution is a 100 tapered buttress thread modelled on the standard API cone thread. Tapered cone styles with 60° threads have been around as connectors for tensile rods such as drill steels since the industrial revolution—downhole hammers used in drilling have a modified tapered buttress thread form, as do components of rock crushing equipment. The specific benefits of using this type of thread are resistance to loosening, quick breakout and the use of thin walled elements as the threadform does not generate significant radial thrust forces. The inventor has chosen to use a modified buttress with a slight overpitch (increased thread pitch) (eg., 3.005 mm) on the puller (relative to 3.00 mm on the studbolt) which gives a near-perfect load distribution on the threads. The shoulders of the buttress-form threads are essentially perpendicular to the pullers and bolts common axis, and therefore have no radial thrust.
The inventor has designed a specific threadform for this application, as shown in
The cone nut assembly 20 can be specifically designed using computer modelling to obtain the best possible component shape to:
This is preferably achieved by modelling the components' deflections during the complete operational cycle of the tensioner to determine the precise set of dimensions “pre-tensioning” which will give the ideal deflected shape “post tensioning”. Obviously, the shape of various sections of components will alter during cycle, and the designer must know what shape to make them so that their compressed shape will allow optimised performance of the fasteners.
The operation of the “cone nut” assembly 20 is quite complex. After being screwed into position during hydraulic pump-up phase, when the pressure is relieved from the system, the upper nut part 21 (with internal cone face) is first put into tension, simply hanging off the upper face of engagement with the collar or cone outer 23. Then, as pressure relief continues, the load being transferred to the “cone nut” assembly 20 increases, the lower part of the thread radially deflects progressively upwards and contacts the adjacent tapered face of the collar. This action effectively dissipates the concentrations of load throughout the thread contact zone, therefore, limiting the radial thrust factor and associated losses of tensile load and bolt extension in the system.
The invention has been described with respect to preferred arrangements which relate to a task where it has ideal application. The scope of the invention is not limited to the embodiments and use hereto described, but also to a wide range of other applications which would be clear to those skilled in the art. Some examples would be for valves, flanges, pumps, compressors, engines and pressure vessels where components of such equipment are retained by tensile members.
This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 09/914,346, filed Aug. 27, 2001, and now abandoned, which claims priority under 35 USC 371 from International Application Serial Number PCT/AU00/00138, filed Feb. 28, 2000, and Australian Application Serial Number PP 8905, filed Feb. 26, 1999.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2571265 | Leufven | Oct 1951 | A |
3083042 | Collar | Mar 1963 | A |
3117485 | Jansen | Jan 1964 | A |
3210096 | Van Der Wissel | Oct 1965 | A |
3424080 | Pappas | Jan 1969 | A |
3707107 | Bieri | Dec 1972 | A |
3797336 | Howe | Mar 1974 | A |
3886707 | Heldt | Jun 1975 | A |
3887990 | Wilson | Jun 1975 | A |
4177999 | Raber | Dec 1979 | A |
4182215 | Green et al. | Jan 1980 | A |
4280274 | Filer | Jul 1981 | A |
4346920 | Dailey | Aug 1982 | A |
4773146 | Bunyan | Sep 1988 | A |
4815360 | Winterle | Mar 1989 | A |
4854798 | Snyder et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
5046906 | Bucknell | Sep 1991 | A |
5092635 | DeLange et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5137408 | Junkers | Aug 1992 | A |
5253967 | Orban et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5263997 | Parker et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5368344 | Plangetis | Nov 1994 | A |
5878490 | Heinold et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
6112396 | Steinbock | Sep 2000 | A |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 748 671 | Dec 1996 | EP |
0 797 012 | Sep 1997 | EP |
0797012 | Sep 1997 | GB |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040165963 A1 | Aug 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09914346 | US | |
Child | 10699948 | US |