The present teachings relate generally to surgical navigation and more particularly to a tensor and methods of using the tensor to balance ligaments or to distract bones during a surgical navigation procedure.
Surgical navigation systems, also known as computer assisted surgery and image guided surgery, aid surgeons in locating patient anatomical structures, guiding surgical instruments, and implanting medical devices with a high degree of accuracy. Surgical navigation has been compared to a global positioning system that aids vehicle operators to navigate the earth. A surgical navigation system typically includes a computer, a tracking system, and patient anatomical information. The patient anatomical information can be obtained by using an imaging mode such as fluoroscopy, computer tomography (CT) or by simply defining the location of patient anatomy with the surgical navigation system. Surgical navigation systems can be used for a wide variety of surgeries to improve patient outcomes.
To successfully implant a medical device, surgical navigation systems often employ various forms of computing technology, as well as utilize intelligent instruments, digital touch devices, and advanced 3-D visualization software programs. All of these components enable surgeons to perform a wide variety of standard and minimally invasive surgical procedures and techniques. Moreover, these systems allow surgeons to more accurately plan, track and navigate the placement of instruments and implants relative to a patient's body, as well as conduct pre-operative and intra-operative body imaging.
To accomplish the accurate planning, tracking and navigation of surgical instruments, tools and/or medical devices during a surgical procedure utilizing surgical navigation, surgeons often use “tracking arrays” that are coupled to the surgical components. The tracking arrays allow the surgeon to accurately track the location of these surgical components, as well as the patient's bones during the surgery. By knowing the physical location of the tracking array, the software detection program of the tracking system is able to calculate the position of the tracked component relative to a surgical plan image.
In a total knee arthroplasty (“TKA”) procedure to replace a worn or damaged knee, a significant amount of effort is devoted to ensuring that the resulting knee joint will be balanced. This balancing procedure is referred to as “soft tissue balancing.” Balancing may involve releasing the medial or collateral ligaments to correct for a varus or valgus deformity, such that the anatomical axis of the knee is correct when equal forces are applied to both collateral ligaments. A balanced knee joint will demonstrate proper ligament tension through the full range of motion, which provides a natural acting joint and minimizes pain and discomfort. Further, properly balanced ligaments reduce stress, wear and tear on the prosthesis and extend its life.
Soft tissue balancing is an imprecise art because there are few ways to precisely quantify the true tension of the ligaments, and this is further complicated by the pathology of arthritis. The amount of true contracture of the knee ligaments and the associated amount of soft tissue releasing required to obtain a “balanced” knee is often uncertain. It is known to use various distraction or “tensor” devices that have members that push the tibia apart from the femoral condyles with a known or pre-determined force, thereby applying the known force to the collateral ligaments. These tensors are often applied only after the bone cuts are complete, however, and are thus used as no more than a check on bone cuts that have been made from standard resection procedures.
Soft tissue balancing represents one of the major unsolved problems in knee surgery, and there is considerable interest in developing tools to assist with this process, especially in surgical navigation procedures.
The present teachings provide an apparatus and method of ligament balancing or bone distraction during a surgical navigation procedure.
In one form thereof, there is provided a tensor for use with a surgical navigation system. The tensor comprises a first bone engaging member engageable with a first bone and a second bone engaging member engageable with a second bone. A force-applying mechanism configured to forcibly move the first and second bone engaging members relative to one another and a sensor detects the value of the force applied by the force-applying mechanism. A transmitter communicates a parameter associated with by the tensor to the surgical navigation system.
The above-mentioned aspects of the present teachings and the manner of obtaining them will become more apparent and the teachings will be better understood by reference to the following description of the embodiments taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
Corresponding reference characters indicate corresponding parts throughout the several views.
The embodiments of the present teachings described below are not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise forms disclosed in the following detailed description. Rather, the embodiments are chosen and described so that others skilled in the art may appreciate and understand the principles and practices of the present teachings.
The surgery is performed within a sterile field, adhering to the principles of asepsis by all scrubbed persons in the operating room. Patient 22, surgeon 21 and assisting clinician 50 are prepared for the sterile field through appropriate scrubbing and clothing. The sterile field will typically extend from operating table 24 upward in the operating room. Typically both computer display image 38 and fluoroscope display image 28 are located outside of the sterile field.
A representation of the patient's anatomy can be acquired with an imaging system, a virtual image, a morphed image, or a combination of imaging techniques. The imaging system can be any system capable of producing images that represent the patient s anatomy such as a fluoroscope producing x-ray two-dimensional images, computer tomography (CT) producing a three-dimensional image, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) producing a three-dimensional image, ultrasound imaging producing a two-dimensional image, and the like. A virtual image of the patient's anatomy can be created by defining anatomical points with surgical navigation system 20 or by applying a statistical anatomical model. A morphed image of the patient's anatomy can be created by combining an image of the patient's anatomy with a data set, such as a virtual image of the patient's anatomy. Some imaging systems, such as C-arm fluoroscope 26, can require calibration. The C-arm can be calibrated with a calibration grid that enables determination of fluoroscope projection parameters for different orientations of the C-arm to reduce distortion. A registration phantom can also be used with a C-arm to coordinate images with the surgical navigation application program and improve scaling through the registration of the C-arm with the surgical navigation system. A more detailed description of a C-aim based navigation system is provided in James B. Stiehl et al., Navigation and Robotics in Total Joint and Spine Surgery, Chapter 3 C-Arm-Based Navigation, Springer-Verlag (2004).
Computer 112 can be any computer capable of properly operating surgical navigation devices and software, such as a computer similar to a commercially available personal computer that comprises a processor 126, working memory 128, core surgical navigation utilities 130, an application program 132, stored images 134, and application data 136. Processor 126 is a processor of sufficient power for computer 112 to perform desired functions, such as one or more microprocessors. Working memory 128 is memory sufficient for computer 112 to perform desired functions such as solid-state memory, random-access memory, and the like. Core surgical navigation utilities 130 are the basic operating programs, and include image registration, image acquisition, location algorithms, orientation algorithms, virtual keypad, diagnostics, and the like. Application program 132 can be any program configured for a specific surgical navigation purpose, such as orthopedic application programs for unicondylar knee (“uni-kee”), total knee, hip, spine, trauma, intramedullary (“IM”) nail, and external fixator. Stored images 134 are those recorded during image acquisition using any of the imaging systems previously discussed. Application data 136 is data that is generated or used by application program 132, such as implant geometries, instrument geometries, surgical defaults, patient landmarks, and the like. Application data 136 can be pre-loaded in the software or input by the user during a surgical navigation procedure.
Output device 116 can be any device capable of creating an output useful for surgery, such as a visual output and an auditory output. The visual output device can be any device capable of creating a visual output useful for surgery, such as a two-dimensional image, a three-dimensional image, a holographic image, and the like. The visual output device can be a monitor for producing two and three-dimensional images, a projector for producing two and three-dimensional images, and indicator lights. The auditory output can be any device capable of creating an auditory output used for surgery, such as a speaker that can be used to provide a voice or tone output.
Removable storage device 118 can be any device having a removable storage media that would allow downloading data such as application data 136 and patient anatomical data 124. The removable storage device can be a read-write compact disc (CD) drive, a read-write digital video disc (DVD) drive, a flash solid-state memory port, a removable hard drive, a floppy disc drive, and the like.
Tracking system 120 can be any system that can determine the three-dimensional location of devices carrying or incorporating markers that serve as tracking indicia. An active tracking system has a collection of infrared light emitting diode (ILEDs) illuminators that surround the position sensor lenses to flood a measurement field of view with infrared light. A passive system incorporates retro-reflective markers that reflect infrared light back to the position sensor, and the system triangulates the real-time position (x, y, and z location) and orientation (rotation around x, y, and z axes) of an array 122 and reports the result to the computer system with an accuracy of about 0.35 mm Root Mean Squared (RMS). An example of passive tracking system is a Polaris® Passive System and an example of a marker is the NDI Passive Spheres™ both available from Northern Digital Inc. Ontario, Canada. A hybrid tracking system can detect active and active wireless markers in addition to passive markers. Active marker based instruments enable automatic tool identification, program control of visible LEDs, and input via tool buttons. An example of a hybrid tracking system is the Polaris® Hybrid System available from Northern Digital Inc. A marker can be a passive IR reflector, an active IR emitter, an electromagnetic marker, and an optical marker used with an optical camera.
As is generally known within the art, implants and instruments may also be tracked by electromagnetic tracking systems. These systems locate and track devices and produce a real-time, three-dimensional video display of the surgical procedure. This is accomplished by using electromagnetic field transmitters that generate a local magnetic field around the patient's anatomy. In turn, the localization system includes magnetic sensors that identify the position of tracked instruments as they move relative to the patient's anatomy. By not requiring a line of sight with the transmitter, electromagnetic systems are also adapted for in vivo use, and are also integrable, for instance, with ultrasound and CT imaging processes for performing interventional procedures by incorporating miniaturized tracking sensors into surgical instruments. By processing transmitted signals generated by the tracking sensors, the system is able to determine the position of the surgical instruments in space, as well as superimpose their relative positions onto pre-operatively captured CT images of the patient.
Arrays 122 can be probe arrays, instrument arrays, reference arrays, calibrator arrays, and the like. Arrays 122 can have any number of markers, but typically have three or more markers to define real-time position (x, y, and z location) and orientation (rotation around x, y, and z axes). As will be explained in greater detail below, an array comprises a body and markers. The body comprises an area for spatial separation of markers. In some embodiments, there are at least two arms and some embodiments can have three arms, four arms, or more. The arms are typically arranged asymmetrically to facilitate specific array and marker identification by the tracking system. In other embodiments, such as a calibrator array, the body provides sufficient area for spatial separation of markers without the need for arms. Arrays can be disposable or non-disposable. Disposable arrays are typically manufactured from plastic and include installed markers. Non-disposable arrays are manufactured from a material that can be sterilized, such as aluminum, stainless steel, and the like. The markers are removable, so they can be removed before sterilization.
Planning and collecting patient anatomical data 124 is a process by which a clinician inputs into the surgical navigation system actual or approximate anatomical data. Anatomical data can be obtained through techniques such as anatomic painting, bone morphing, CT data input, and other inputs, such as ultrasound and fluoroscope and other imaging systems.
The mechanism for forcibly adjusting members 302 and 304a, 304b vertically apart from one another is by means of rod 309, shaft 311, load cell 336 and spring 316. Rod 309 is housed in tubular member 310 and is fixably attached to operating knob or dial 312 near its distal end 327. Proximal end 328 of rod 309 is housed inside of central bore 339 of shaft 311 and is configured to move upwardly relative to the shaft. More particularly, rod 309 may advance into central bore 339 of shaft 311, as described in more detail below. Load cell 336 is fixably coupled to rod 309 and includes an upper surface 329 to support spring 316. Spring 316 surrounds rod 309 and is positioned between upper surface 329 of load cell 336 and bottom surface 331 of the shaft 311, to which it is keyed.
Tensor 300 further includes a removable and autoclavable transmitter 320 (best shown in
In addition to transmitting the force exerted by the tensor device, transmitter 320 is also configured to measure and transmit the space between members 302 and 304a, 304b and/or the distance between the tibial plateau and the condyles during the distraction process. More particularly, as a downward force is exerted onto outer shaft 314a and ultimately onto pivot arm 313, the left side of the pivot arm pivots downwardly and correspondingly causes attachment arm 322 to displace downwardly relative to body 321 through the internal bore 323. This displacement is measured by the transmitter and then transmitted to the navigation system. Alternatively and/or additionally, the tensor is also adapted to comprise a gap or joint space indicator 318 on one or both of the outer shafts 314a, 314b. According to this embodiment, indicator 318 includes a visible indication screen (such as an LCD screen or other such display surface) which is located directly on the surface of the tensor and configured to display the distance between the tibial plateau and the condyles and/or the distance between the bone engaging members during the distraction process.
The remaining structural details of the tensor assembly of the illustrated embodiment can be better understood with reference to a description of operation. Returning now to
As rod 309 is advanced upwardly during the distraction process, the compressive force on spring 316 increases, resulting in load cell 336 moving closer to shaft 311 as the spring compresses and/or shaft 311 advances vertically upward. As shaft 311 advances vertically upward, its proximal end 333 advances further into bore 340 of upper housing 342. As described above, pivot arm 313 is pivotably mounted to shaft 311 and thus moves upwardly along with shaft 311. As this happens, the ends 313a and 313b of pivot arm exert upward forces on pegs 319a and 319b, respectively. However, the amount of resistance the ends encounter by pegs 319a and 319b at any given time depends upon the individual force encountered by bone engaging members 304a and 304b from the respective ligaments or bones being distracted. In practice, as the bone engaging members 304a, 304b first begin displacing away from member 302, they will likely not be touching their respective condyles and therefore will likely encounter little resistance, such that arm 311 will not significantly pivot about peg 319a as shaft 311 moves upwardly. Once the engaging members 304a, 304b begin to distract their respective ligaments, the end 313a or 313b that encounters the least resistance from its respective peg will move upwardly to a greater extent (i.e., arm 313 pivots) and thus displaces its respective engaging member (304a or 304b) to a greater extent until the amount of downward force on both ends 313a, 313b of arm 313 is the same.
To better understand and appreciate the present teachings, an exemplary illustration of a knee distraction process is now provided. As is known in the art, a key to reinstating natural joint function involves alignment of the mechanical axis of the leg with the balanced tension on the collateral ligaments and related soft tissue. As shown in
Releasing the MCL can be accomplished by conventional means, typically involving cutting a part of the ligament to extend its length. After the MCL is released, the tensor is replaced and the upper leg alignment checked again. It should be understood and appreciated that the releasing of soft tissue is an iterative process and may be required more than once before completed. As such, the force of the tensor is once again adjusted to provide equal forces to both ligaments. As shown in
Next, as shown in
As shown in
As shown in
While the above illustrated embodiment describes using a tensor during a knee ligament distraction procedure, it should be appreciated that the exemplary tensors disclosed herein may also be used to perform various other bone distraction procedures. For instance, the tensor may also be used to distract two or more bones of the spine. According to this illustration, the first and second bone engaging members are respectively adapted to engage first and second vertebral bodies or discs within the spinal column.
Moreover, while the present teachings describe a means for forcibly distracting or moving bony structures or vertebrae with a spring based force-applying mechanism that is configured to forcibly distract such structures with bone engaging members engaged thereto, one of skill in the art would readily recognize several alternate means for applying a predetermined force to the bone engaging members could also be used in accordance with the present teachings. For instance, such other means include, but are not limited to, pneumatic devices, gas cylinders, magnets and/or various other spring arrangements and the like. As such, the present teachings are not intended to be limiting in nature. Indeed, these teachings contemplate a wide variety of means for distracting bones or ligaments with a tensor device.
One illustration of an exemplary spinal tensor or distractor in accordance with the present teachings is shown in
Spinal distractor 800 also includes locking mechanism 816 that is provided to maintain a desired spacing of bone engaging distraction members 806, 808 during the spinal distraction procedure. To achieve such a locking arrangement, locking mechanism 816 includes a threaded bolt 818 that is pivotally coupled to handle 804 and slidably passable therethrough. In turn, threaded bolt 818 includes locking nut 820, which is threadably coupled thereto and configured such that its rotation causes the length of bolt 818 positioned between handles 802, 804 to shorten or lengthen as desired. The mechanical operation of such spinal distraction devices is generally known within the bone distraction art and does not require further discussion herein (see for instance, U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,017,342, 6,712,825 and 7,081,118).
To distract spinal members or vertebral bodies, conventional spinal distractors (such as those referenced above) operate on a purely mechanical level. More particularly, the distractor is inserted between the spinal bodies and a force is applied to expand the bodies as needed. The amount of distraction (displacement) and the amount of force that is applied is not determined. However, it is important to not distract the spine too much or apply an unhealthy force to the spine, as it may cause additional injury or an undesired outcome. To minimize these problems, the present teachings provide a means to quantitatively measure both displacement and force during the distraction of two or more spinal members during a distraction procedure.
According to one aspect of the present teachings, spinal distractor 800 is a navigated spinal distractor that can be utilized to measure displacement and/or force. To measure force, transducers 824 are placed on the distractor and are configured to communicate with a computer 826 that is placed within the operating room. More particularly, bone engaging distraction members 806, 808 each include a transducer or load cell device, which is located on the outside portion of its tip 812, 814. These transducers are comprised of a pressure sensitive material or film, such as FlexiForceo Load/Force Sensors and System manufactured by Tekscan, Inc., 307 West First Street. South Boston, Mass. 02127-1309. Transducers 824 are capable of determining the pressure encountered by either one of bone engaging distraction members 806, 808 when they respectively contact a vertebral member (e.g., see reference numerals 830, 832 in
To measure the displacement of the vertebral bodies 830, 832 or pedicle screws 834, 836 during the distraction process, trackable array 838 is placed on distractor 800. By using a trackable array that is detectable and trackable by the surgical navigation system, the system is able to measure the amount of displacement, including rotation and orientation, of the distractor and therefore the displacing members (e.g., vertebral bodies, pedicle screws etc., as referenced above).
Another exemplary embodiment of a navigated spinal distractor in accordance with the present teachings is shown with reference to
To measure the distraction force of distractor 900 during a distraction process, transducers 910 are positioned at the base of pils 905 and configured to communicate with a computer 912 by either a hard-wired 914 or wireless connection. More particularly, pins 905 each include a transducer or load cell device, which is located on the outside portion of its base. These transducers are comprised of a pressure sensitive material or film, such as FlexiForce® Load/Force Sensors and System manufactured by Tekscan, Inc., 307 West First Street. South Boston, Mass. 02127-1309. Transducers 910 are capable of determining the pressure encountered by either one of bone engaging distraction members 902 when they respectively contact the pins that are drilled into vertebral bodies 906, 908. More particularly, when either one of the bone engaging distraction members 902 come into contact with pins 905, that distraction member will encounter resistance to movement along distraction axis 918. Because transducers 910 contain a pressure sensitive material, the distraction force is detectable and translatable into a pressure reading that is transmittable to computer 912 via a communication link. In one exemplary embodiment according to the present teachings, the pressure reading is transmitted by the transducers via an infrared transmitter device capable of establishing a communication link with the navigation system. Infrared transmission devices are known in the art and do not need to be discussed in further detail here. In further exemplary embodiments, the communication link is established with the navigation system through a hard-wired connection 914. Whatever means is used to transmit the pressure reading to computer 912, the computer is then configured to record, process and display to a user this force information so that it can be further considered and analyzed as needed. While this exemplary embodiment illustrates transducers 910 on both pins 905, it should be understood and appreciated herein that the transducers could alternatively be placed on both ends of distraction members 902 of the distractor itself. As such, the present teachings are not intended to be limited herein.
In addition to measuring the force caused by distractor 900 during the distraction process, the amount of displacement between the vertebral bodies 906, 908 may also be measured. To accomplish this measurement, trackable array 916 is placed on distractor 900. By using a trackable array that is detectable and trackable by the surgical navigation system, the system is able to measure the amount of displacement, including rotations and orientations, of the distractor and therefore the displacing members (e.g., vertebral bodies, etc., as referenced above).
While an exemplary embodiment incorporating the principles of the present invention has been disclosed hereinabove, the present invention is not limited to the disclosed embodiments. Instead, this application is intended to cover any variations, uses, or adaptations of the invention using its general principles. Further, this application is intended to cover such departures from the present disclosure as come within known or customary practice in the art to which this invention pertains and which fall within the limits of the appended claims.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/778,709, filed Mar. 3, 2006, which is incorporated in its entirety herein by this reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4341220 | Perry | Jul 1982 | A |
4360028 | Barbier et al. | Nov 1982 | A |
4501266 | McDaniel | Feb 1985 | A |
5213112 | Niwa et al. | May 1993 | A |
5309913 | Kormos et al. | May 1994 | A |
5517990 | Kalfas et al. | May 1996 | A |
5611353 | Dance et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5628315 | Vilsmeier et al. | May 1997 | A |
5669914 | Eckhoff | Sep 1997 | A |
5688282 | Baron et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5732703 | Kalfas et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5769861 | Vilsmeier | Jun 1998 | A |
5776064 | Kalfas et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5911723 | Ashby et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5967982 | Barnett | Oct 1999 | A |
5980535 | Barnett et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5999837 | Messner et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6021343 | Foley et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6122541 | Cosman et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6190395 | Williams | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6226548 | Foley et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6236875 | Bucholz et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6340363 | Bolger et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6348058 | Melkent et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6377839 | Kalfas et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6385475 | Cinquin et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6434507 | Clayton et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6471706 | Schumacher et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6490467 | Bucholz et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6697664 | Kienzle, III et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6725080 | Melkent et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6796988 | Melkent et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6856828 | Cossette et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6859661 | Tuke | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6887245 | Kienzle, III et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6887247 | Couture et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6899714 | Vaughan | May 2005 | B2 |
6923817 | Carson et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6932823 | Grimm et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6980849 | Sasso | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7008430 | Dong et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7686812 | Axelson et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7686813 | Stutz et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7763020 | Draper | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7840256 | Lakin et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
20020095081 | Vilsmeier | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20030069591 | Carson et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20040102785 | Hodorek et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040249314 | Salla et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040267242 | Grimm et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050015005 | Kockro | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050020941 | Tarabichi | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050021031 | Foley et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050021037 | McCombs et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050021039 | Cusick et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050038432 | Shaolian et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050038514 | Helm et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050049485 | Harmon et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050059885 | Melkent et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050070900 | Serhan et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050075632 | Russell et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050080334 | Willis | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050101966 | Lavallee | May 2005 | A1 |
20050113659 | Pothier et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050113846 | Carson | May 2005 | A1 |
20050119661 | Hodgson et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050119783 | Brisson et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050177169 | Fisher et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050177170 | Fisher et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050215888 | Grimm et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050234332 | Murphy | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050234461 | Burdulis, Jr. et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050234465 | McCombs et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050234468 | Carson | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050251065 | Henning et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050251148 | Friedrich et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050261680 | Draper | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050267353 | Marquart et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050267354 | Marquart et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050267358 | Tuma et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050267485 | Cordes et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060009778 | Collins et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060015018 | Jutras et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060015031 | Kienzle | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060015120 | Richard et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060052691 | Hall et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060241569 | DiSilvestro | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070225595 | Malackowski et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070233144 | Lavallee et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070244488 A1 | Oct 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60778709 | Mar 2006 | US |