This disclosure relates generally to terminal blocks and, more particularly, to terminal blocks including integral safety relays having independently testable contacts.
Certain examples are shown above in the identified figures and described below in detail. In describing these examples, like or identical reference numbers are used to identify the same or similar elements. The figures are not necessarily to scale. Certain features and views of the figures may be exaggerated in scale or may be in schematic form for clarity or conciseness. Additionally, several examples have been described throughout this specification. Any features from any example may replace, be included with, or otherwise combined with other features from other examples.
Some safety instrumented systems may include safety relays, which may require a relatively high degree of diagnostic coverage and fault tolerance. For example, a hardware device fault tolerance of one implies that one component of the device could fail and the function would still be performed by the device. From these requirements, safety relays have been developed that provide multiple switching elements to break an electrical path between, for example, a power source or other signal source and a field device. Generally, these safety relays use multiple force-guided relays that have mechanically linked relay contacts. As a result, the relay contacts move together when one or more relay coils are energized or de-energized.
In some examples, a de-energize-to-fail circuit may include two relay contacts electrically coupled in series. In such examples, either of the relays may break the electrical path to a field device (e.g., a field actuator) to remove its power. In other examples (energize to actuate), two relays have coils electrically coupled in parallel such that when power is removed, both relays close.
The examples disclosed herein relate to terminations, termination modules and/or blocks including integral relays having independently testable contacts. In some examples, the example termination blocks include integral relays associated with a de-energize-to-fail circuit. In some such examples, the coils are powered from the same source and the relay contacts are electrically coupled in series. To enable a user to test the operability of the relay contacts during a proof test, in some examples, the example termination block includes a test point. To perform a proof test, a user may measure the resistance across the contacts (e.g., the voltage should be zero) and then actuate the relays and measure the voltage between the test point and the first and/or second relay contacts to verify that the contacts associated with the coil are not welded or otherwise unable to break an electrical path.
In other examples, the example termination blocks include integral relays associated with an energize-to-actuate circuit. Is some such examples, the coils are individually actuated and the relay contacts are electrically positioned in parallel. To perform a proof test, a user may measure the voltage across the contacts (e.g., the voltage should be non-zero) and then actuate the relays and measure the voltage between the relay contacts (e.g., field termination points) in sequence to verify that the contact associated with the coil is not welded or otherwise unable to break an electrical path.
In this example, the termination module 100 includes an integral relay module 106 and a fuse 107. The relay module 106 includes first and second switches 108, 110 electrically coupled in series. In some examples, the switches 108 and 110 may respond to signals from coils and/or inductors 112, 114 to simultaneously open and/or close. In other examples, the switches 108 and 110 may not simultaneously open and, instead, may open and close independently.
The relay module 106 may be coupled to the control circuits 102, 104 to control the conveyance of power and/or other signals to the control circuits 102, 104. Thus, in operation, the relay module 106 may be used to apply power to the control circuits 102, 104, remove power from the control circuits 102, 104 and/or apply or remove any other signal(s) from the control circuits 102, 104.
To enable the relay module 106 to be proof tested to ensure that the switches 108, 110 are operational and not welded, for example, the example relay module 106 includes a test point and/or area 116. To perform the proof test, a user may measure the voltage between a first contact 118 and the test point 116 with the first switch 108 in the open and closed states and then measure the voltage between a second contact 120 and the test point 116 with the second switch 110 in the open and closed states. If the switches 108, 110 are operating properly, no voltage will be measured when the respective switches 108, 110 are closed and voltage will be measured when the respective switches 108, 110 are open.
In this example, the termination module 500 includes an integral relay module 507 including first and second termination screws 508, 510, switches 512, 514, coils and/or inductors 516, 518, a test point 520 and a fuse 522. The relay module 507 may be coupled to the control circuits 502, 504 to control the conveyance of power from a power source 524 and/or other signals to the control circuits 502, 504 and/or a solenoid 526. Thus, in operation, the relay module 507 may be used to apply power to the control circuits 502, 504 and/or the solenoid 526, remove power from the control circuits 502, 504 and/or the solenoid 526 and/or apply or remove any other signal(s) from the control circuits 502, 504 and/or the solenoid 526. While
In this example, the termination module 600 includes an integral relay module 606 and a fuse 608. The relay module 606 includes first and second switches 610, 612 electrically coupled in parallel that may respond to signals from coils 614, 616 to close. In some examples, the switches 610 and 612 may open and/or close independently at different times. However, in other examples, the switches 610 and 612 may open simultaneously.
The relay module 606 may be coupled to the control circuits 602, 604 to control the conveyance of power and/or other signals to the control circuits 602, 604. Thus, in operation, the relay module 606 may be used to apply power to the control circuits 602, 604, remove power from the control circuits 602, 604 and/or apply or remove any other signal(s) from the control circuits 602, 604.
To proof test the relay module 606 to ensure that the switches 610, 612 are operational and not welded, fused, or otherwise unable to break an electrical path, for example, a user may open both switches 610, 612 and measure the voltage between first and second contacts 618, 620. The voltage between first and second contacts 618, 620 is measured with the second switch 612 open and the first switch 610 closed. The voltage between first and second contacts 618, 620 is measured with the first switch 610 open and the second switch 612 closed. If the switches 610, 612 are operating properly, no voltage will be measured when one or both of the switches 610, 612 are closed and voltage will be measured when the switches 108, 110 are open.
In this example, the termination module 1000 includes an integral relay module 1007 including first and second termination screws 1008, 1010, switches 1012, 1014, coils and/or inductors 1016, 1018 and a fuse 1020. The relay module 1007 may be coupled to the control circuits 1002, 1004 to control the conveyance of power from a power source 1022 and/or other signals to the control circuits 1002, 1004 and/or a solenoid 1024. Thus, in operation, the relay module 1007 may be used to apply power to the control circuits 1002, 1004 and/or the solenoid 1024, remove power from the control circuits 1002, 1004 and/or the solenoid 1024 and/or apply or remove any other signal(s) from the control circuits 1002, 1004 and/or the solenoid 1024. While
Although certain example methods, apparatus and articles of manufacture have been described herein, the scope of coverage of this patent is not limited thereto. On the contrary, this patent covers all methods, apparatus and articles of manufacture fairly falling within the scope of the appended claims either literally or under the doctrine of equivalents.
This patent arises from and claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/710,290, filed Oct. 5, 2012, which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
7053624 | Klijn | May 2006 | B2 |
7180297 | Deak | Feb 2007 | B2 |
20060006898 | Kusumoto | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060209488 | Papenbreer | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20080079318 | Burr | Apr 2008 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Rockwell Automation, Allen-Bradley, “1771 Digital I/O Relay Contact Output Modules” (Published Sep. 1997). |
Emerson Process Management, “DeltaV SIS Conditioning Components”, Jul. 2009, 9 pages. |
Emerson Process Management, “S-series Electronic Marshalling”, Jun. 2012, 35 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140097850 A1 | Apr 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61710290 | Oct 2012 | US |