This present invention relates generally to electrical connectors, and particularly to improving the performance, construction and ease of use of connectors on aluminum wire.
Electrical wires are most often made with copper or aluminum conductors. These may be of one solid piece, or stranded. For ease of connections, for instance to grounding studs, or power strips, a lug or terminal is often attached to the end of the wire. The terms lug, terminal lug, and terminal will be used interchangeably in this application. A wire with a terminal, will be termed a “cable” in this application. The cable, including the interface between the terminal and the conductor, must efficiently conduct the electricity that the cable is meant to carry. If the conductance at the interface is not efficient (if resistance is high), the cable may not perform the function for which it is intended, or it may overheat. Usually, the terminal mechanically fastens to the aluminum or copper conductor. If there is insulation on the wire, it is first removed or penetrated in an area sufficient to allow proper electrical contact which is usually metal-to-metal contact. Sometimes attachment occurs with a heat process such as welding or soldering, however these tend to be slower methods than mechanical fastening. Also, the heat of these processes could deteriorate the properties of the nearby insulation that is on the conductor. Mechanical crimping of a terminal around a wire is commonly used. However, the chemistry of aluminum oxidation makes crimping to an aluminum wire more difficult than to a copper wire, as will be explained.
It is known that aluminum resists corrosion (oxidation) better than steel does. For example, lawn furniture made of steel develops flaking rust (oxidation) but aluminum furniture does not. Aluminum also oxidizes almost instantaneously when exposed to air, but the oxide does not subsequently flake off. Instead, the oxidized surface layer is very thin and very strong. It protects the nonoxidized aluminum below by separating it from the surrounding air. This property of aluminum presents a problem in the manufacture of aluminum cables because the oxide layer is a poor conductor of electricity. Thus, one consideration in aluminum cable manufacture is how to get good electrical conductivity between a terminal and an aluminum wire. Preferably, good electrical conductivity is achieved in a cost effective manner that has a low opportunity for problems to arise during the manufacturing process.
Another consideration in cable manufacture is how to create a cable that resists moisture and air infiltration between the terminal and the conductor. In many cases this means making an airtight connection between the terminal and the exterior of the wire insulation.
Still another consideration in cable manufacture is how to provide a terminal/cable combination that has a consistent and strong geometry. Preferably the terminal and cable are straight and smooth to avoid stress concentrations. With stranded wire, severing one or more strands during the terminal attachment process should also be avoided.
There have been many attempts at making a terminal for use with Aluminum wire. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 3,955,044 to Hoffman et al., issued May 4, 1976 shows one such prior art.
There are many drawbacks to the prior art, including, but not limited to the multiple pieces that are required and that lead to increased cost and opportunity for assembly errors, severing of one or more strands, and the non-linear alignment between the connector portion and the wire barrel after crimping. The present invention addresses these drawbacks and other drawbacks in the prior art.
An integral electrical terminal for use with aluminum wire has a mount portion for connecting to a part of an electric circuit and a wire receiving portion. The wire receiving portion has a continuous annular interior with a contact portion that has an integral oxide breaker. The receiving portion may also have a sealing portion that has at least one integral seal ring for sealing with the insulator on the wire.
The integral oxide breaker may have tapered protrusions with a coating. In one embodiment the coating is nickel, and the protrusions are a helical thread. The receiving portion accepts an aluminum wire to make a cable, and upon crimping of the receiving portion the oxide breaker makes electrical contact with the wire.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate embodiments of the invention and, together with a general description of the invention given below, serve to explain the principles of the invention.
With reference to
With reference to
An integral funnel 154 is between the seal portion 136 and the contact portion 138. The integral funnel 154 guides the conductor strands 22 from the larger seal portion 136 into the contact portion 138, while the wire 20 is being inserted into the terminal 100.
The contact portion 138 has a continuous cylindrical wall 155 with a major diameter 156 and an integral oxide breaker 158, the term this application will use for the macro object that breaks through the oxide layer on the aluminum conductor strands 22.
The integral oxide breaker 158 comprises a plurality of tapered protrusions 162 extending radially inward from the major diameter 156 of the contact portion 138. These tapered protrusions 162 may be separate from each other, but in the embodiment shown, for ease of manufacture, these tapered protrusions 162 are in the form of a helical thread 164 (
It is also contemplated that other forms of oxide breakers, for example discrete annular protrusions, would also work, however the making of one spiral thread is a widely perfected and efficient process.
In use to make an assembly 178 (
The assembly 178 is placed in a modified hex crimping die 182 (
Internally, as illustrated in
Magnified examinations of sectioned cables 184 showed scrubbing action as the oxide breaker 158 penetrated the outside conductor strands 22 about 40% of their individual diameters. The protrusions 162 were seen to be buckled by compression, further increasing the scrubbing action that breaks the oxide.
Testing was conducted to verify the performance of the terminal with the integral oxide breaker 158 as follows:
Oxide Breaker testing: A smooth bore design was compared with a machined oxide breaker by testing. Results showed that the smooth bore did not meet the low initial 6.0 millivolt requirement whereas the machined oxide breaker barrel met the requirement with very good margin. Further testing after Thermal Shock and Current Cycling proved that the machined oxide breaker feature continued to perform well.
Thermal Shock testing: After the initial millivolt drop testing, a modified 100 cycle Thermal Shock test was run on the same set of 2/0 AWG Single-Hole Tensolite Aluminum Terminal samples. The temperature was cycled between −65° C. and +175° C. but no current flow was included in the testing. Millivolt drop results were tested at the end of the 100 cycles. The millivolt results after 100 cycles show that the terminals met the millivolt requirement of BPS-T-217 and the more stringent millivolt requirement of BPS-T-233.
Current Cycling testing: After Thermal Shock, a Current Cycling test was run on the same 2/0 AWG samples. A BPS-T-233 test method was used to evaluate the performance of the Tensolite 2/0 AWG single-hole terminals. Two assemblies were mounted in series with each of the four terminals attached to 7054-T4751 aluminum plates. Temperature verses current results showed all samples passed the 160 F. degrees maximum and MV maximum drop.
Hydrostatic seal testing: The hydrostatic test used aluminum terminals crimped to wire and installed into a water filled chamber. The chamber was cycled 25 times from 0 to 80 PSI and held at pressure for 15 minutes each cycle. All samples passed.
Mechanical Strength of Crimp testing: All samples exceeded the 825-850 lb-Force target. The samples failed at the conductor and not in the crimp zone. Samples had previously gone through Thermal Shock and Current Cycling testing.
Consistent and Repeatable Length testing: Crimping of the 2/0 samples resulted in a consistent 0.10 inch length growth verses 0.25 to 0.38 inches for the bath tub crimp of the prior art.
While the present invention has been illustrated by the description of the embodiments thereof, and while the embodiments have been described in considerable detail, it is not the intention of the applicant to restrict or in any way limit the scope of the appended claims to such detail. Additional advantages and modifications will readily appear to those skilled in the art. Therefore, the invention in its broader aspects is not limited to the specific details representative apparatus and method, and illustrative examples shown and described. Accordingly, departures may be made from such details without departure from the spirit or scope of applicant's general inventive concept.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1156710 | Rowe | Oct 1915 | A |
D90584 | Koch | Aug 1933 | S |
1970635 | Szekely | Aug 1934 | A |
1989718 | John | Feb 1935 | A |
2379567 | Buchanan | Jul 1945 | A |
2385792 | Carlson | Oct 1945 | A |
2410321 | Watts | Oct 1946 | A |
2480280 | Bergan | Aug 1949 | A |
2551299 | Sowa | May 1951 | A |
2554813 | Buchanan | May 1951 | A |
RE23688 | Watts | Jul 1953 | E |
2654873 | Swengel | Oct 1953 | A |
2671889 | Vickery | Mar 1954 | A |
2681439 | Carlson | Jun 1954 | A |
2681440 | Swengel | Jun 1954 | A |
2721986 | Badeau | Oct 1955 | A |
2724098 | Bergan | Nov 1955 | A |
2735997 | Peterson | Feb 1956 | A |
2769965 | Nelson | Nov 1956 | A |
2795769 | Wells | Jun 1957 | A |
2802257 | Holtzapple | Aug 1957 | A |
2806214 | Forney, Jr. | Sep 1957 | A |
2806215 | Redslob | Sep 1957 | A |
2807792 | O'Keefe | Sep 1957 | A |
2815497 | Redslob | Dec 1957 | A |
2855581 | Freedom | Oct 1958 | A |
D185743 | Edwards | Jul 1959 | S |
D188105 | Cobaugh | Jun 1960 | S |
2957226 | Bern | Oct 1960 | A |
3098688 | Martin | Jul 1963 | A |
3123663 | Muldoon | Mar 1964 | A |
3356987 | Francis | Dec 1967 | A |
3496626 | Ullman | Feb 1970 | A |
3512123 | Costello | May 1970 | A |
3549786 | Kuo | Dec 1970 | A |
3573721 | Masino et al. | Apr 1971 | A |
3594713 | Thoman | Jul 1971 | A |
3633153 | Ahmed | Jan 1972 | A |
3695642 | DeWoody | Oct 1972 | A |
3717839 | Aldridge | Feb 1973 | A |
3728665 | Frey | Apr 1973 | A |
3732718 | Barberio et al. | May 1973 | A |
3735331 | O'Donnell et al. | May 1973 | A |
3757031 | Izraeli | Sep 1973 | A |
3763555 | Van | Oct 1973 | A |
D230025 | Hoffman | Jan 1974 | S |
3812448 | Haitmanek | May 1974 | A |
3828298 | Schumacher | Aug 1974 | A |
3831132 | Bowden et al. | Aug 1974 | A |
D233438 | Bruner | Oct 1974 | S |
3895851 | Bolton et al. | Jul 1975 | A |
3931726 | Grubb | Jan 1976 | A |
3955044 | Hoffman et al. | May 1976 | A |
4031613 | Brown | Jun 1977 | A |
4114253 | Loomis et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
4139937 | L'Homme | Feb 1979 | A |
4142771 | Barnes et al. | Mar 1979 | A |
4210379 | Vachhani et al. | Jul 1980 | A |
4426772 | Collier | Jan 1984 | A |
4478479 | Cherry | Oct 1984 | A |
4557048 | Cordeiro | Dec 1985 | A |
4604890 | Martin | Aug 1986 | A |
4605279 | Mixon | Aug 1986 | A |
4648673 | Endo et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4679888 | Williams | Jul 1987 | A |
4684191 | Feher et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4693688 | Cembruch | Sep 1987 | A |
4754536 | Goyert et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4795380 | Frantz | Jan 1989 | A |
4813893 | Sindlinger | Mar 1989 | A |
4821383 | Grosklos | Apr 1989 | A |
4828351 | Beinhaur | May 1989 | A |
4828516 | Shaffer | May 1989 | A |
4845589 | Weidler | Jul 1989 | A |
4861290 | Halmstad et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4902253 | Schacht | Feb 1990 | A |
4959988 | Dassance | Oct 1990 | A |
4979291 | Phillips | Dec 1990 | A |
4983133 | Van Scyoc | Jan 1991 | A |
4998895 | Forney et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5095599 | Gloe et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5127255 | Skotek | Jul 1992 | A |
5174022 | Phillips | Dec 1992 | A |
5175925 | Grosklos | Jan 1993 | A |
5188544 | Mukai | Feb 1993 | A |
5188545 | Hass et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5203724 | Casey | Apr 1993 | A |
5288245 | Piana | Feb 1994 | A |
5418331 | Delalle | May 1995 | A |
5422438 | Lamome | Jun 1995 | A |
5499934 | Jacobsen et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5514836 | Delalle et al. | May 1996 | A |
5745982 | Klinedinst | May 1998 | A |
6152784 | Pyles | Nov 2000 | A |
6415499 | Holland et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6558208 | Suzuki | May 2003 | B2 |
6658725 | Liu | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6666732 | Endacott | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6670555 | Ota et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6726510 | Norbert | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6881104 | Suzuki et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6883229 | Schuppert, Jr. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6893301 | Kuwayama et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6945819 | Laub et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7081589 | Advey et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7168159 | Imai | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7210958 | Jacques et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
7264503 | Montena | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7285011 | Hardy et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7370408 | Deming et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
20070264873 | Kakuta | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080217055 | Gumley | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080307934 | Coe | Dec 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1465155 | Dec 1968 | DE |
9215578 | Dec 1992 | DE |
19821630 | Sep 1999 | DE |
1965464 | Sep 2008 | EP |
Entry |
---|
Seven-page Partial International Search dated Apr. 8, 2010 for PCT Application No. PCT/US2010/024216. |
Five-page International Search Report dated Jun. 7, 2010 for PCT Application No. PCT/US2010/024216. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100206631 A1 | Aug 2010 | US |