This present invention relates generally to electrical connectors, and particularly to improving the performance, construction and ease of use of connectors on aluminum wire.
Electrical wires are most often made with copper or aluminum conductors. These may be of one solid piece, or stranded. For ease of connections, for instance to grounding studs, or to power strips, a lug or terminal is often attached to the end of the wire. The terms lug, terminal lug, and terminal will be used interchangeably in this application. A wire with a terminal is also referred to as a “cable” herein. A cable might also incorporate multiple electrical conductors or wires that are connected or spliced together end-to-end. The cable, including the interface between the terminal and the conductor or between adjacent conductors, must efficiently conduct the electricity that the cable is meant to carry. If the conductance at the interface is not efficient (if resistance is high), the cable may not perform the function for which it is intended, or it may overheat. Usually, the terminal mechanically fastens to the aluminum or copper conductor. If there is insulation on the wire, it is first removed or penetrated in an area sufficient to allow proper electrical contact which is usually metal-to-metal contact. Sometimes attachment occurs with a heat process such as welding or soldering, however these tend to be slower methods than mechanical fastening. Also, the heat of these processes could deteriorate the properties of the nearby insulation that is on the conductor. Mechanical crimping of a terminal around a wire is commonly used. However, the chemistry of aluminum oxidation makes crimping to an aluminum wire more difficult than to a copper wire, as will be explained.
It is known that aluminum resists corrosion (oxidation) better than steel does. For example, lawn furniture made of steel develops flaking rust (oxidation) but aluminum furniture does not. Aluminum also oxidizes almost instantaneously when exposed to air, but the oxide does not subsequently flake off. Instead, the oxidized surface layer is very thin and very strong. It protects the nonoxidized aluminum below by separating it from the surrounding air. This property of aluminum presents a problem in the manufacture of aluminum cables because the oxide layer is a poor conductor of electricity. Thus, one consideration in aluminum cable manufacture is how to get good electrical conductivity between a terminal and an aluminum wire or between the transition spanning between two coupled or spliced sections of wire. Preferably, good electrical conductivity is achieved in a cost effective manner that has a low opportunity for problems to arise during the manufacturing process.
Another consideration in cable manufacture is how to create a cable that resists moisture and air infiltration between the terminal and the conductor or at the transition between two spliced wires. In many cases this means making an airtight connection between the terminal or transition and the exterior of the wire insulation.
Still another consideration in cable manufacture is how to provide a terminal/cable combination that has a consistent and strong geometry. Preferably the terminal and cable are straight and smooth to avoid stress concentrations. With stranded wire, severing one or more strands during the terminal attachment process should also be avoided.
There have been many attempts at making a terminal for use with Aluminum wire. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 3,955,044 to Hoffman et al., issued May 4, 1976 shows one such prior art.
There are many drawbacks to the prior art, including, but not limited to the multiple pieces that are required and that lead to increased cost and opportunity for assembly errors, severing of one or more strands, and the non-linear alignment between the connector portion and the wire barrel after crimping. The present invention addresses these drawbacks and other drawbacks in the prior art.
An electrical component for use with wires, such as aluminum or copper wire, might be in the form of a terminal or connector. The terminal has a mount portion, for connecting to a part of an electric circuit, and a wire receiving portion. The connector implements adjacent wire receiving portions to receive the ends of wires that are connected together. The wire receiving portions have an interior with a contact portion that has an oxide breaker element. The wire receiving portion may also have a sealing portion that has at least one integral seal ring for sealing with the insulator of a wire.
The integral oxide breaker element may have tapered protrusions with a coating. In one embodiment the coating is nickel, but may be other suitable materials. The wire receiving portion accepts a wire, such as aluminum or copper wire to make a cable, and upon crimping of the receiving portion the oxide breaker element makes electrical contact with conductor(s) of the wire.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate embodiments of the invention and, together with a general description of the invention given below, serve to explain the principles of the invention.
With reference to
With reference to
An integral funnel 154 is between the seal or sealing portion 136 and the contact portion 138. The integral funnel 154 guides the conductor strands 22 from the larger seal portion 136 into the contact portion 138, while the wire 20 is being inserted into the terminal 100.
The contact portion 138 has a continuous cylindrical wall 155 with a major diameter 156 and an integral oxide breaker or oxide breaker element 158, the term this application will use for the macro object that breaks through the oxide layer on the conductor or conductor strands 22 when the wire receiving portion is crimped.
The integral oxide breaker element 158 comprises a plurality of protrusions, such as tapered protrusions 162, extending radially inward from the major diameter 156 of the contact portion 138. The protrusions are configured to engage the conductor of a wire positioned in the contact portion, and to protrude into the wire when the wire receiving portion is crimped. These tapered protrusions 162 may be separate from each other, but in other embodiments, for ease of manufacture, these tapered protrusions 162 are in the form of a helical thread 164 (
The structure of the oxide breaker element provides not only the ability to break through the oxide layer on the conductor strand, but also improves the electrical and mechanical features of the invention. For example, electrically, the construction of the oxide breaker element increases the surface area of the crimp, and the contact with the conductor, to improve the overall electrical properties of the connection in the transition from the wire to the terminal. Furthermore, the oxide breaker element 158 increases the grip function at the contact portion 138, and increases the pull force necessary to remove the wire 20 from terminal 100.
It is also contemplated that other forms of structures or elements might be used for the oxide breaker element 158, for example discrete annular protrusions might also be used. The making of one or more spiral threads is a widely perfected and efficient process.
In use to make an assembly 178 (
The assembly 178 is placed in a suitable crimping die, such as a modified hex crimping die 182 (
Internally, as illustrated in
Magnified examinations of sectioned cables 184 showed scrubbing action as the oxide breaker 158 penetrated the outside conductor strands 22 about 40% of their individual diameters. The protrusions 162 were seen to be buckled by compression, further increasing the scrubbing action that breaks the oxide.
Testing was conducted to verify the performance of the terminal with the integral oxide breaker 158 as follows:
Oxide Breaker testing: A smooth bore design was compared with a machined oxide breaker by testing. Results showed that the smooth bore did not meet the low initial 6.0 millivolt requirement whereas the machined oxide breaker barrel met the requirement with very good margin. Further testing after Thermal Shock and Current Cycling proved that the machined oxide breaker feature continued to perform well.
Thermal Shock testing: After the initial millivolt drop testing, a modified 100 cycle Thermal Shock test was run on the same set of 2/0 AWG Single-Hole Tensolite Aluminum Terminal samples. The temperature was cycled between −65° C. and +175° C. but no current flow was included in the testing. Millivolt drop results were tested at the end of the 100 cycles. The millivolt results after 100 cycles show that the terminals met the millivolt requirement of BPS-T-217 and the more stringent millivolt requirement of BPS-T-233.
Current Cycling testing: After Thermal Shock, a Current Cycling test was run on the same 2/0 AWG samples. A BPS-T-233 test method was used to evaluate the performance of the Tensolite 2/0 AWG single-hole terminals. Two assemblies were mounted in series with each of the four terminals attached to 7054-T4751 aluminum plates. Temperature verses current results showed all samples passed the 160 F. degrees maximum and MV maximum drop.
Hydrostatic seal testing: The hydrostatic test used aluminum terminals crimped to wire and installed into a water filled chamber. The chamber was cycled 25 times from 0 to 80 PSI and held at pressure for 15 minutes each cycle. All samples passed.
Mechanical Strength of Crimp testing: All samples exceeded the 825-850 lb-Force target. The samples failed at the conductor and not in the crimp zone. Samples had previously gone through Thermal Shock and Current Cycling testing.
Consistent and Repeatable Length testing: Crimping of the 2/0 samples resulted in a consistent 0.10 inch length growth verses 0.25 to 0.38 inches for the bath tub crimp of the prior art.
The connectors of
The connector embodiments share various features with the terminal embodiments discussed hereinabove. Specifically, the connector 300 of
Turning now to
As illustrated in
As discussed herein, the oxide breaker element might be a bare structure essentially presenting the metal of the connector 300 to the wire conductor. Alternatively, the oxide breaker element, and particularly the protrusions and structures of the oxide breaker element 324, might be coated with a suitable coating, similar to the coatings discussed herein above with respect to the terminal embodiment. Both of the oxide breaker elements of the connectors 300, 301 might be coated with a coating, or only one might be coated with the other one left uncoated.
As noted,
Turning now to
The wires connected may be of the same material or of different materials. Also, as noted, both of the oxide breaker elements of a connector might be coated with a coating such as Nickel, or only one might be coated. For example, if an aluminum wire is spliced to a copper wire, only the receiving portion and oxide breaker element that engages the aluminum wire might be coated. Of course, if two aluminum wires are spliced, both oxide breaker elements might be coated, for example.
In accordance with one aspect of the invention, the terminal 350 includes a mount portion 352, which may be mounted to an appropriate surface, such as a grounding surface, when a wire or cable implementing terminal 350 is implemented. Terminal 350 also includes a wire receiving portion 354 constructed as discussed herein. For example, as illustrated in
Generally, when a plating or coating of a material layer is provided, such as within the interior space of the wire receiving portion 354, the crimping process can be affected, sometimes detrimentally. In coating the interior surfaces, such as the oxide breaker element, the exterior surfaces of the device are also coated. Generally, when crimped, a majority percentage of the wire receiving portion 354 will be crimped as shown herein for capturing a wire conductor, and breaking up any oxide on the outer surface of the wire conductor. While certain coating materials flow over the outer surface of wire receiving portion 354 during the crimping process, other coating materials are harder and more brittle. In such cases, the coating material may extrude or flow into various crimp points of the die, such as the seams 183, as illustrated in
In accordance with one aspect of the invention, the outside surface of the wire receiving portion is coated with a lubricant layer 360. The lubricant layer 360 is made of a suitable lubricant material, such as PTFE, such as FluoroPlate®-XK3-654-LT, available from Orion Industries of Chicago, Ill. The lubricant layer 360 is applied generally to the wire receiving portion 354, but only on the outside surface thereof. Other areas, such as the internal surfaces of the wire receiving portion 354, as well as the mount portion 352, are appropriately masked to prevent any overspray. The wire receiving portion 354 outside or external surface may be appropriately degreased while certain of the conductive areas are masked to be kept free from overspray. The lubricant material is applied on the outside surface of at least part of the wire receiving portion, such as in a thickness in the range of 0.0003-0.001 inches. In one particular embodiment, the thickness of the applied lubricant layer 360 may be 0.0006+/−0.0002 inches. The applied lubricant layer 360 may also be cured at around 160°+/−5° Fahrenheit, for around twenty minutes.
The lubricant layer 360 provides lubrication to a harder coating material, such as nickel, so that, during the crimp, the coating materials flow more easily in the die, and prevents undesirable flashing. In that way, the overall terminal or connector is improved, and failed crimps are minimized.
As illustrated in
For example, as illustrated in
In applying the flexible seal rings 370, a solvent wash might be utilized to wash the interior surfaces of the wire receiving portion 364. Using a high pressure dispenser with volumetric control, one or more 360° rings of sealant are applied. The flexible seal rings 370, in one embodiment, may be 50% higher than the height of the adjacent rigid seal rings 318. In another embodiment of the invention, the flexible seal rings 370 might be applied by hand, with a suitable tool to deposit material in the various areas 316, such as up to a level with the rings 316. The material applied is appropriately viscous, and can flow, but then hardens. Material may then be allowed to cure at room temperature, such as for a minimum of twenty-four hours, to provide the seal features of embodiments of the invention.
While the present invention has been illustrated by the description of the embodiments thereof, and while the embodiments have been described in considerable detail, it is not the intention of the applicant to restrict or in any way limit the scope of the appended claims to such detail. Additional advantages and modifications will readily appear to those skilled in the art. Therefore, the invention in its broader aspects is not limited to the specific details representative apparatus and method, and illustrative examples shown and described. Accordingly, departures may be made from such details without departure from the spirit or scope of applicant's general inventive concept.
This application is a Continuation application of U.S. Continuation-in-Part application Ser. No. 14/010,073, filed Aug. 26, 2013, entitled “TERMINAL HAVING INTEGRAL OXIDE BREAKER”, which application is a Continuation-in-Part application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/371,765, filed Feb. 16, 2009, entitled “TERMINAL HAVING INTEGRAL OXIDE BREAKER”, now Issued U.S. Pat. No. 8,519,267, Issued Aug. 27, 2013, which application and issued patent are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1156710 | Rowe | Oct 1915 | A |
D90584 | Koch | Aug 1933 | S |
1970635 | Szekely | Aug 1934 | A |
1989718 | John | Feb 1935 | A |
2379567 | Buchanan | Jul 1945 | A |
2385792 | Carlson | Oct 1945 | A |
2410321 | Walls | Oct 1946 | A |
2480280 | Bergan | Aug 1949 | A |
2551299 | Sowa | May 1951 | A |
2554813 | Buchanan | May 1951 | A |
RE23688 | Watts | Jul 1953 | E |
2654873 | Swengel | Oct 1953 | A |
2671889 | Vickery | Mar 1954 | A |
2681439 | Carlson | Jun 1954 | A |
2681440 | Swengel | Jun 1954 | A |
2721986 | Badeau | Oct 1955 | A |
2724098 | Bergan | Nov 1955 | A |
2735997 | Peterson | Feb 1956 | A |
2769965 | Nelson | Nov 1956 | A |
2795769 | Wells | Jun 1957 | A |
2799721 | Floyd, Jr. | Jul 1957 | A |
2802257 | Holtzapple | Aug 1957 | A |
2806214 | Forney, Jr. | Sep 1957 | A |
2806215 | Redslob | Sep 1957 | A |
2807792 | O'Keefe | Sep 1957 | A |
2815497 | Redslob | Dec 1957 | A |
2855581 | Freedom | Oct 1958 | A |
D185743 | Edwards | Jul 1959 | S |
D188105 | Cobaugh | Jun 1960 | S |
2957226 | Bern | Oct 1960 | A |
2974400 | Sowa | Mar 1961 | A |
3098688 | Martin | Jul 1963 | A |
3123663 | Muldoon | Mar 1964 | A |
3356987 | Francis | Dec 1967 | A |
3496626 | Ullman | Feb 1970 | A |
3512123 | Costello | May 1970 | A |
3549786 | Kuo | Dec 1970 | A |
3573721 | Teagno et al. | Apr 1971 | A |
3594713 | Thoman | Jul 1971 | A |
3633153 | Ahmed | Jan 1972 | A |
3695642 | DeWoody | Oct 1972 | A |
3717839 | Aldridge | Feb 1973 | A |
3728665 | Frey | Apr 1973 | A |
3732718 | Barberio et al. | May 1973 | A |
3735331 | O'Donnell et al. | May 1973 | A |
3757031 | Izraeli | Sep 1973 | A |
3763555 | Van de Kerkhof | Oct 1973 | A |
D230025 | Hoffman | Jan 1974 | S |
3812448 | Haitmanek | May 1974 | A |
3828298 | Schumacher | Aug 1974 | A |
3831132 | Bowden, Jr. et al. | Aug 1974 | A |
D233438 | Burner | Oct 1974 | S |
3895851 | Bolton et al. | Jul 1975 | A |
3931726 | Grubb | Jan 1976 | A |
3955044 | Hoffman et al. | May 1976 | A |
4031613 | Brown et al. | Jun 1977 | A |
4073744 | Eliades | Feb 1978 | A |
4114253 | Loomis et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
4139937 | L'Homme | Feb 1979 | A |
4142771 | Barnes et al. | Mar 1979 | A |
4150866 | Snyder, Jr. et al. | Apr 1979 | A |
4210379 | Vachhani et al. | Jul 1980 | A |
4283597 | Cooper, Jr. | Aug 1981 | A |
4388523 | Keep, Jr. et al. | Jun 1983 | A |
4426772 | Collier et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
4478479 | Cherry et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
4557048 | Cordeiro | Dec 1985 | A |
4604890 | Martin | Aug 1986 | A |
4605279 | Mixon, Jr. | Aug 1986 | A |
4611872 | Ito | Sep 1986 | A |
4648673 | Endo et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4679888 | Williams | Jul 1987 | A |
4684191 | Feher et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4693688 | Cembruch et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4754536 | Goyert et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4795380 | Frantz | Jan 1989 | A |
4813893 | Sindlinger | Mar 1989 | A |
4821383 | Grosklos et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4828351 | Beinhaur | May 1989 | A |
4828516 | Shaffer | May 1989 | A |
4845589 | Weidler et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4861290 | Halmstad et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4902253 | Schacht | Feb 1990 | A |
4959988 | Dassance et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4979291 | Phillips et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
4983133 | Van Scyoc et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
4998895 | Forney et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5095599 | Gloe et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5127255 | Skotek | Jul 1992 | A |
5174022 | Phillips et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5175925 | Grosklos et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5188544 | Mukai | Feb 1993 | A |
5188545 | Hass et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5203724 | Casey | Apr 1993 | A |
5288245 | Piana et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5418331 | Delalle | May 1995 | A |
5422438 | Lamome | Jun 1995 | A |
5499448 | Tournier | Mar 1996 | A |
5499934 | Jacobsen et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5514836 | Delalle et al. | May 1996 | A |
5745982 | Klinedinst | May 1998 | A |
6025559 | Simmons | Feb 2000 | A |
6152784 | Pyles | Nov 2000 | A |
6388894 | Paggi et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6415499 | Holland et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6558208 | Suzuki | May 2003 | B2 |
6570094 | King, Jr. | May 2003 | B2 |
6658725 | Liu | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6666732 | Endacott | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6670555 | Ota et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6726510 | Norbert et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6836620 | Bischoff | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6881104 | Suzuki et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6883229 | Schuppert, Jr. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6893301 | Kuwayama et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6945819 | Laub et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7081027 | Woodward | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7081589 | Advey et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7168159 | Imai | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7210958 | Jacques et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
7256348 | Endacott | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7264503 | Montena | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7285011 | Hardy et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7370408 | Deming et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7494388 | Kakuta | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7527523 | Yohn et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7537494 | Umlauf | May 2009 | B1 |
7538274 | Bertini | May 2009 | B2 |
7786383 | Gumley | Aug 2010 | B2 |
8066525 | Melni | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8350155 | Kobayashi et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8408929 | Solon | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8519267 | Peters et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8622772 | Akuta | Jan 2014 | B2 |
9385449 | Peters et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
20050054245 | Greaves | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20070054138 | Lau | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20080217055 | Gumley | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080252158 | Yohn et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080307934 | Coe | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20120133224 | Grosskopf et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20170117640 | Arenburg | Apr 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1465155 | Dec 1968 | DE |
9215578 | Dec 1992 | DE |
19821630 | Sep 1999 | DE |
1965464 | Sep 2008 | EP |
2006101664 | Apr 2006 | JP |
2010151652 | Jul 2010 | JP |
Entry |
---|
Seven-page Partial International Search Report dated Apr. 8, 2010 for PCT Application No. PCT/US2010/024216. |
Five-Page Internatinoal Search Report dated Jun. 7, 2010 for PCT Application No. PCT/2010/024216. |
Installation Instruction 400LR Feb. 1995. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160315398 A1 | Oct 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14010073 | Aug 2013 | US |
Child | 15202275 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12371765 | Feb 2009 | US |
Child | 14010073 | US |