Patent Grant
8213928
The present invention generally relates to wireless communications, and more particularly relates to testing the interoperability of devices that communicate wirelessly, such as with Bluetooth® enabled devices.
Short range wireless communication is available on many electronic devices, such as cell phones, microphone and earpiece headsets, laptop computers, desktop computers and is also widely available on many vehicles. Many of these wireless devices are configured with a popular wireless communication package, commonly referred to as Bluetooth® devices. Bluetooth® enabled devices are developed and sold by many companies. As a result, the internal implementation of technology employed in the various Bluetooth® enabled products may vary from one product to another. This often results in problems in trying to ensure the operability of one device wirelessly communicating with another device. In order for developers of devices to ensure proper wireless operation, a large scale interoperability test is generally required.
To perform a large scale interoperability test, developers typically hire outside companies or invest in developing an internal capability to manually test software and hardware associated with their devices' ability to interact with existing or prelaunch hardware. Typically, the interoperability testing is conducted manually by operating individual devices communicating wirelessly with a newly-developed product, such as an entertainment system in a vehicle. This requires purchasing a vast number of devices that may communicate with the entertainment system in the marketplace. As a consequence, the conventional interoperability testing approach requires substantial money and time.
It is therefore desirable to provide for interoperability testing between wireless communication devices that makes the testing more feasible and less costly.
According to one aspect of the present invention, a test apparatus is provided for testing interoperability of a first device to communicate with a second device via wireless communication. The test apparatus includes a wireless interface configured to interface via wireless communication with at least first and second devices. The test apparatus also includes a processor, memory and logic stored in memory and executed by the processor. The logic causes the test apparatus to sequence through a plurality of wireless communication actions to communicate with a first device, monitor behavior of the first device during the actions, and store characteristics of the monitored behavior in memory so that the test apparatus may be used to emulate the first device when wirelessly communicating with a second device.
According to another aspect of the present invention, a method for testing interoperability of a first device to communicate with a second device via wireless communication is provided. The method includes the steps of providing a test apparatus having a wireless interface configured to interface via wireless transmission with at least first and second devices and communicating the test apparatus with at least a first device. The method also includes the steps of causing the test apparatus to sequence through a plurality of wireless communication actions to communicate with the first device, monitoring behavior of the first device during the actions, and storing characteristics of the monitored behavior in memory. The method further includes the steps of emulating the first device with the test apparatus when wirelessly communicating with a second device.
These and other features, advantages and objects of the present invention will be further understood and appreciated by those skilled in the art by reference to the following specification, claims and appended drawings.
The present invention will now be described, by way of example, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
Referring now to
With reference to
Memory 20 may include any known storage medium, such as random access memory (RAM), read-only memory (ROM), electrically erasable programmable read-only memory (EEPROM), flash memory and other memory devices. Memory 20 is shown including an application programming interface (API) portion 22 having a higher abstraction layer 24 and an abstraction layer 26 within the higher abstraction layer 24. Stored within the abstraction layer 26 is a profile wireless functional specification for learned behavior models 30. The learned behavior models are learned during the replication of a first device 32 and are stored in memory 20 and provide information relevant to the interoperability of the wireless (e.g., Bluetooth®) communication of the first device 32. It should be appreciated that a plurality of learned behavior models 30 may be stored in memory 20 to accommodate the learned replication of a plurality of first devices 32. Also stored in memory 20 is a device replication routine 100 for learning the behavior models and a device emulation routine 200 for emulating the learned first device 32 when communicating with a second device 42, according to one embodiment. Routines 100 and 200 are stored as logic executable by the processor 12.
The test apparatus 10 is also shown including a wireless interface 16 adapted to interface via wireless communication with a plurality of devices. The wireless interface 16 may allow wireless communication via short range wireless communication such as Bluetooth®, according to one embodiment. According to another embodiment, the wireless interface 16 may allow short range wireless communication via IEEE spec 802.11. It should be appreciated that the wireless interface 16 may allow other wireless communication including medium range and long range wireless communication such as may be experienced with a local area network (LAN) wireless communication.
The test apparatus 10 further includes a touch screen display 14 which may display output visual information to a user and may allow for a user to interface and input information to the test apparatus 10. Referring particularly to
The replicator and emulator test apparatus 10 serves both as a replicator to learn wireless interoperability of one or a plurality of first devices 32 and as an emulator to emulate the one or plurality of first devices 32 when communicating with a second device 42. The test apparatus 10 is shown communicating with a first wireless device, such as a Bluetooth® enabled cell phone 32 in
Once one or a plurality of first wireless devices 32 have been learned by the test apparatus 10 and their behavior model characterization parameters are stored in memory, the test apparatus 10 may be employed to test interoperability of the first wireless devices 32 with one or more second wireless devices 42 as shown in
Referring to
Once the test apparatus and the first Bluetooth® enabled device are paired, the replication routine 100 proceeds to step 108 to exercise defined use cases. The use cases may include sequencing through a number of actions involving communication of the test apparatus with each Bluetooth® enabled first device. The sequence of events may include a pairing action, a connection action, a reconnection action, a profile action and multiple profile actions. The use cases typically may be a use that is generally required to exercise use of the device through its full range of behavior. According to one embodiment, the use cases may include a device pairing, a device service connection, a device disconnection and reconnection, and profile actions. The profile actions may be functional steps defined in the present and future Bluetooth® functional profile specifications for profiles including, but not limited to, hands-free phone profile, headset profile, advanced audio distribution profile, audio/video remote control profile, phonebook access profile, object push profile, dial-up networking profile, and other profiles as updated and/or adopted. These actions may be performed multiple times each, in every different valid sequence and by every different valid optional way possible to capture variation by user input. Use cases may also include multiple profile actions which are user actions (or use cases) which require simultaneous use of more than one Bluetooth® profile. Multiple profile actions may include a cell phone streaming music and receiving a call at the same time.
Based on the defined use cases, routine 100 may apply the results to develop a behavior model of the first device in step 110. The behavior model may then be stored in memory in step 112. The characterization parameters of the behavior model may include message response and sequencing, timing between event and responses, message and data formats of response messages, and optional specification features in the Bluetooth® specification. The stored behavior model characterization parameters are indicative of the operability of the first wireless device such that the test apparatus is able to emulate the first device. Once the characterization parameters are stored in memory, the replication routine 100 deletes the connection at step 114. Next, routine 100 proceeds to decision step 116 to determine if the test apparatus is finished learning this first device and, if not, turns to step 106. If the test apparatus is finished learning this first device, then replication routine 100 proceeds to decision step 118 to determine if more Bluetooth® enabled devices are to be learned and, if so, returns to step 104 to emulate therein the next first device. If no more Bluetooth® enabled devices are to be learned as the first device, then replication routine 10 is finished with the replication process at step 120.
Referring to
Once the pairing and connection actions are complete, emulation routine 200 proceeds to step 210 to execute a product test plan using the emulator in place of the first Bluetooth® enabled device. The product test plan may include the user interacting with the touch screen display of the test apparatus to enter certain inputs so that the test apparatus may check the interoperability of the first device with the second device. Once the product test plan is complete, emulation routine 200 proceeds to step 212 to delete the connections. At decision step 214, emulation routine 200 determines whether the test apparatus is finished testing the second device under test against the emulated first device and, if not, returns to step 208. If the test apparatus is finished testing the second device under test against the emulated first device, then routine 200 proceeds to decision step 216 to determine if more emulated Bluetooth® enabled devices are to be emulated to test with the second device under test and, if so, returns to step 206 to emulate the next first device. If no more emulated first devices are to be emulated, emulation routine 200 is complete at step 218.
The emulation routine 200 executes the product test plan by interacting with a user, according to one embodiment. The test procedure for executing the product text plan may include any of a number of actions that are performed to test interoperability of one or a plurality of first devices with a second device. One example of a test procedure for testing each of the plurality of first devices with the second device is described in the following table which provides the Bluetooth® profile, the requirement, the test procedures implemented and the expected results, which are recorded for each device that is emulated:
The test procedure may be interactive in which a user interfaces with the touch screen display to input actions pursuant to the test procedure. It should be appreciated that some of the test procedure actions may be automated and that the expected results may be automatically stored in memory and may be processed to determine whether the interoperability of each first device with the second device performs satisfactory. One example of a test procedure is given which includes actions for registration, connectivity, placing a phone call, receiving or ending a call, muting a call, providing tones, transfer function, indicator displays, third call/call waiting, phonebook transfers, handsfree on/off actions, registrations, and other actions. It should be appreciated that these and other actions may be applied for any given test procedure, depending upon the functionality of the devices and the expected interoperability of the devices. It should be appreciated that while the test procedure shown and described herein is one example of testing a first device with a second device by emulating the first device. It should be appreciated that the same or similar test procedure may be employed during the replication process to learn the characteristics of each of a plurality of first devices by performing similar actions and storing these characteristics in the test apparatus.
Accordingly, it should be appreciated that the test apparatus 10 advantageously learns the behavior characteristics of a plurality of wireless first devices and emulates the plurality of wireless first devices when communicating with a second device so as to allow for enhanced interoperability testing. The test apparatus 10 advantageously allows for the elimination of physical first devices when testing a second device so that a developer, such as a manufacturer of a vehicle or a device employed based on an automotive vehicle, may easily and cost effectively check the interoperability of their devices.
It will be understood by those who practice the invention and those skilled in the art, that various modifications and improvements may be made to the invention without departing from the spirit of the disclosed concept. The scope of protection afforded is to be determined by the claims and by the breadth of interpretation allowed by law.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7398083 | Ying | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 20030156549 | Binder et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20040209612 | Barberis et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20060223522 | Guo et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20100130195 A1 | May 2010 | US |
