This specification relates generally to a test fixture for interfacing a tester and a unit under test (UUT).
In-circuit test (ICT) may include testing a populated printed circuit board (PCB) to determine whether the PCB was properly assembled. For example, in-circuit testing may include performing tests to identify, on the PCB, short circuits, open circuits, wrong value components, unexpected resistance, capacitance, or inductance, and so forth. A test fixture acts as an interface between the PCB and test equipment used to perform in-circuit testing.
ICT operates by gaining electrical access to a PCB test through the test fixture. When performing electrical tests, each active and passive component is typically isolated from other surrounding components and tested on an individual basis. The PCB under test is designed to support this level of testability by incorporating test pads on signal nets that can be contacted by the test fixture.
The test fixture typically provides the physical and electrical interface between an ICT system and a unit under test (UUT), such as a PCB, as described above. One of the purposes of the test fixture is to translate, geographically, test pins of a test system's receiver interface to test pad locations on the UUT. This routing of electrical signals from the test system's receiver to the UUT test pads has historically been performed using interconnect methods within the test fixture. Perhaps the most widely used interconnect method in an ICT fixture includes direct wiring from a pin connecting to the tester to a POGO pin that contacts the test pad on the UUT. This type of test fixture is called a “wired fixture”. Wired fixtures are generally considered to be lower cost fixtures, especially in one-off situations or in low volume usage.
Another type of interconnect method in an ICT fixture includes use of a PCB to route signals, rather than the individual wires as in a wired fixture. The type of test fixture that uses a PCB to route signals is called a “wireless fixture”. Wireless fixtures are generally more expensive to manufacture than wired fixtures and are usually deployed only in higher-volume applications, where the price of designing and building a PCB can be amortized over multiple test fixtures.
Both of the foregoing types of test fixtures have a number of common drawbacks in that the time to develop the fixtures may be too long (e.g., on the order of three to eight weeks, depending upon node count and complexity), and that the cost may be higher than the market is willing to bear for a disposable buy item.
In this regard, one of the issues with ICT is the cost and development time associated with the test fixture. These test fixtures, whose cost can range from $10,000 to over $100,000, are typically unique to the specific board being tested and cannot be used to test any other board types. As a result, while the manufacturer may have only one or two ICT systems on a manufacturing line, it is likely the manufacturer has purchased tens to hundreds of different test fixtures, many of which have become obsolete as a result of short product lifetimes.
An example test fixture is for interfacing a tester and a unit under test (UUT). The example test fixture comprises: first electrical contacts that face the tester; second electrical contacts that face the UUT; and a substrate comprised of sections of printed first material. The first material is electrically non-conductive; and the substrate is between the first electrical contacts and the second electrical contacts. The example test fixture also includes structures through the substrate. The structures comprise sections of second material. The second material is electrically conductive, and at least one of the structures electrically connects a first electrical contact and a second electrical contact. The example text fixture may also include one or more of the following features, either alone or in combination.
At least one of the structures within the substrate may have a section that is non-vertical and non-horizontal relative to upper and lower surfaces of the substrate. The first material may surround, and be in contact with, at least part of the first electrical contacts. The example text fixture may include a base plate holding the second electrical contacts. The sections of printed first material may be on the base plate. The base plate may comprise at least parts that are electrically non-conductive.
The first electrical contacts may comprise sections of printed third material. The third material may be electrically conductive and comprise a noble metal. The first electrical contacts may comprise pin receptacles for holding pins that mate to contacts of the UUT. The second material may comprise a silver-based material.
At least one of the structures may comprise the second material surrounded, at least in part, by a dielectric material. The dielectric material may be surrounded, at least in part, by conductive material. The example text fixture may include a top plate holding the first electrical contacts. The top plate may be attached to the substrate.
The first electrical contacts may comprise pins and the second electrical contacts may comprise pads. The first electrical contacts may have a layout that corresponds to a layout of contacts on the UUT. The second electrical contacts may have a layout that corresponds to a layout of contacts on part of the tester. The second material may comprise a combination of printed conductor and non-printed material.
An example method of forming a test fixture for interfacing a tester and a unit under test (UUT) comprises: forming a substrate and structures in the substrate at least in part through accumulation of sections of material, with at least some of the sections of material comprising electrically non-conductive material that forms the substrate and electrically-conductive material that forms the structures. The substrate is to be between first electrical contacts and second electrical contacts. The first electrical contacts face the tester, and the second electrical contacts face the UUT. At least one of the structures is formed to electrically connect a first electrical contact and a second electrical contact. The example method may also include one or more of the following features, either alone or in combination.
At least one of the structures within the substrate may be formed to have a section that is non-vertical and non-horizontal relative to upper and lower surfaces of the substrate. Forming the substrate may comprise accumulating the sections of material onto a base plate, with the base plate holding the second electrical contacts. Forming the substrate may comprise: holding the second electrical contacts in place using an apparatus; forming at least part of at least one of the sections around the second electrical contacts; waiting until the at least part of at least one of the sections anneals; and removing the apparatus.
The at least part of at least one of the sections may comprise a base section; and accumulating the sections may comprise forming additional sections on top of the base section. The first electrical contacts may be formed through the accumulation of the sections of material, with at least some of the sections comprising electrically-conductive material that forms the first electrical contacts.
The example method may comprise: arranging the first electrical contacts to have a layout that corresponds to a layout of contacts on the UUT; and arranging the second electrical contacts to have a layout that corresponds to a layout of contacts on part of the tester. The first electrical contacts may comprise pin receptacles for holding pins to mate to contacts of the UUT. At least one of the structures may be formed of the electrically-conductive material surrounded, at least in part, by a dielectric material, with the dielectric material being surrounded, at least in part, by another electrically-conductive material.
The example method may comprise pressing at least one of the first electrical contacts or the second electrical contacts into the substrate. The example method may comprise attaching a top plate to the substrate. The top plate may hold the first electrical contacts; and the top plate may be attached so that the first electrical contacts form an electrical connection to corresponding structures at locations of the first electrical contacts. The electrically-conductive material may comprise a combination of printed conductor and non-printed material.
The foregoing may reduce the cost of an ICT cell and also may reduce the time to construct an appropriate test fixture.
Any two or more of the features described in this specification, including in this summary section, can be combined to form implementations not specifically described herein.
The systems and techniques described herein, or portions thereof, can be implemented as/controlled by a computer program product that includes instructions that are stored on one or more non-transitory machine-readable storage media, and that are executable on one or more processing devices to control (e.g., coordinate) the operations described herein. The systems and techniques described herein, or portions thereof, can be implemented as an apparatus, method, or electronic system that can include one or more processing devices and computer memory to store executable instructions to implement various operations.
The details of one or more implementations are set forth in the accompanying drawings and the description below. Other features and advantages will be apparent from the description and drawings, and from the claims.
In-circuit test (ICT) may be used to identify manufacturing process defects and component defects on populated printed circuit board (PCB) assemblies. ICT systems (or simply, test systems) may obtain access to a unit under test (UUT), such as a PCB, through a test fixture (also called a test fixture interface). When performing electrical tests, active and passive components on a UUT are typically isolated from other surrounded components and tested on an individual basis. The PCB is configured to support this level of testability by incorporating test pads that can be contacted by corresponding electrical contacts on the test fixture.
The example test fixtures described herein provide the physical and electrical interface between the test system and the UUT—in the examples described herein, a PCB. The example test fixtures may be configured to route signals between test pins of the ICT system's receiver interface and test pad locations on the UUT.
The test fixtures may be produced using an additive manufacturing process, such as three-dimensional (3D) printing. For example, a test fixture may be, or include, an interface (called an interconnect or translator) that is additively-manufactured using co-printed dielectric material (e.g., electrically non-conductive material) and electrically-conductive material. The electrically-conductive (or, simply “conductive”) material may include, but is not limited to, heavily-loaded silver particles in a thermoplastic or thermoset matrix. Silver and other noble metals may be used because their oxides, that may appear over time, are also conductive. Alternatively, conductive materials such as copper or copper alloys can be used. In cases where materials such as these are used, the additive manufacturing process may be performed in an inert atmosphere, such as Nitrogen (N2), so that oxidation over time of the base conductive material is inhibited.
In some implementations, electrically non-conductive (or, simply “non-conductive”) layers are printed on a base plate. The base plate may become part of the test fixture, or it may be removed, as described herein. In an example, the lower test fixture interface to the test system is implemented by the base plate. For example, the base plate may provide the mechanical and electrical foundation upon which layers of material may be added by additive manufacturing to form the test fixture. In some implementations, the base plate includes electrical contacts, that are configured and arranged to mate to corresponding electrical contacts on the ICT system (or test system) receiver and to mate to correspondingly arranged vias in the test fixture. Material forming the non-conductive parts of the test fixture interface is applied around electrical contacts on the base plate, and surrounds those contacts. Thereafter, conductive and non-conductive material is accumulated over the resulting structure, in layers, to form the test fixture. In some implementations, the base plate is used as an initial structure on which layers are accumulated, and is subsequently removed, with appropriate test system contacts added to, or formed in, the test fixture.
Electrical interconnection among multiple additively-manufactured layers may be implemented through inter-layer structures. Examples of such inter-layer structures include, but are not limited to, conductors, such as vias, which are formed in, or added to, the test fixture. In some cases, the vias can be “blind” (surface layer to inner layer), or “buried” (inner layer to inner layer). Transmission of signals, including high-speed or low-signal-level signals, may benefit from additively-manufactured conduits. That is, through additive manufacturing, conductors may be formed that are shielded, coaxial, and that have a controlled characteristic impedance. Signal transmission may be improved through use of conductors such as these.
In some implementations, the test fixture may be additively-manufactured directly upon target pads (or “brads”) or cups, without using a base plate, as described herein, to support the test brads. As described above, in some implementations, a temporary unit (which may be a base plate or other type of apparatus) that is comprised of any appropriate rigid material may be used to mechanically retain the interface brads in place while the additive manufacturing (e.g., 3D printing) process begins. Once the printing, or at least a portion thereof, has been completed and the printed material has cured, the temporary unit can be removed and re-used for to form subsequent test fixtures.
In some implementations, test system POGO pins, which may be located in the test system receiver, directly connect to electrical contacts on the bottom of the test fixture. In some implementations, the electrical contacts on the bottom of the test fixture may be pads (or brads). These pads may be printed with thick, hard material in order to withstand the repeated contact force of the tester POGO pins. In some implementations, POGO pin receptacles may be used in place of pads.
In some implementations, the top of the test fixture includes an electrical path to POGO pins or other electrical contacts that ultimately mate to UUT test pads. The electrical contacts may be implemented in several ways, depending upon the process capabilities and cost targets of the manufacturer. In some implementations, thick pads are printed and may include gold, e.g., a hard gold finish, to promote improved electrical conductivity and resistance to oxidation that may otherwise negatively impact contact reliability. In some implementations, noble metals other than gold may be used.
In some implementations, an interconnect vehicle between the test fixture and the UUT test pads may include a top plate 10 comprising a double sided POGO pin structure that is mechanically held in a fixed geographic location relative to the UUT (see, e.g.,
In some implementations, POGO pin receptacles that normally reside in a drilled POGO pin carrier can be temporarily held in place by a holder during additive manufacturing of the test fixture interface, allowing them to become a permanent part of the test fixture, rather than part of a carrier plate. This eliminates the cost of a carrier plate and the cost of the drilling holes in the carrier plate. An example implementation of such a test fixture to interface between a test system and a UUT, which may reduce both fixture cost and signal path length, is shown in
Referring to
As explained, example structures include, but are not limited to, one or more vias that are electrically conductive. As noted, the substrate and structures in the substrate may be formed, in whole or in part, through accumulation of layers of material. During an example additive manufacturing process, layers are deposited, one on top of the other. Each layer may include conductive and non-conductive materials, arranged so as to form the substrate and structures, through accumulation of layers, at appropriate locations within the test fixture. As the layers are deposited, e.g., using a 3D printer or other appropriate additive manufacturing device, the type of material being deposited changes at appropriate locations. For example, in areas of a layer that are to be part of the substrate, non-conductive material is deposited, and in areas of the layer that are to be a conductive structure, conductive material is deposited.
As in the examples described above, conductive structures can pass all the way through the test fixture in order to connect electrical contacts on the test system to electrical contacts on the UUT. In some cases, however, structures need not pass all the way through a fixture. For example, a blind structure may electrically connect one external electrical contact (such as a contact to the test system or to the UUT) to an internal conductive layer or structure.
As noted, in some implementations, the conductive structures are vias. Some vias may be formed (e.g., printed) horizontally and vertically, as measured relative to the top plane 21 of the tester and the bottom plane 22 of the UUT, or as measured relative to the upper and lower surfaces of the substrate 24 that forms the test fixture 20 (see, e.g.,
Referring to
In the example of
In some implementations, one or more of the conductive structures (e.g., the vias) includes the conductive material surrounded, in whole or part, by a dielectric material, and the dielectric material is surrounded, in whole or part, by conductive material. That is, one or more of the vias may be coaxial, with the internal conductive material forming the signal path and a concentric outer material (with a dielectric between the two) forming the return path. Any appropriate dielectric may be used, such as air or the material otherwise used to form the non-conductive parts of the substrate.
As described above, a base plate may hold electrical contacts 29 to the test fixture. Sections of printed non-conductive material are formed on the base plate, and then the vias are formed to connect, electrically, to the contacts on the base plate. In some implementations, the base plate, aside from the electrical contacts thereon, is formed of a non-conductive material that is sufficiently rigid to support additive manufacturing thereon. The non-conductive material of the base plate may be the same as, or different from, the non-conductive material of the test fixture (the substrate).
In some implementations, a top plate holds the electrical contacts to the UUT. For example, the top plate may hold pin receptacles to which POGO pins on the UUT interface. The top plate may be attached to substrate 24 in any appropriate manner. For example,
In some implementations, as shown in
Referring back to
Referring to
In any event, to form conductive and non-conductive parts of the test fixture, layers of conductive and/or non-conductive material are accumulated (54). Depending upon the structures that they are to form, individual layers may include non-conductive material only, a combination of conductive and non-conductive material, or conductive material only. In some implementations, the formation process includes forming conductive structures (e.g., vias) using a combination of accumulated material and other, added, conductive material. For example, a part of a via may be formed through additive manufacturing, and holes may be left in the substrate that connect to the formed part of the via. Conductive material may be added to the holes to complete formation of the via. In some implementations, the test fixture may include some vias formed solely by additive manufacturing, some vias formed by addition of metal to holes (e.g., by non-additive manufacturing processes), and some vias may be formed through a combination of additive manufacturing and non-additive manufacturing processes. Vias are connected to appropriate conductive pads to form electrical pathways.
In some implementations, electrical contacts (e.g., contact pad or pin receptacles) are arranged on the top of the fixture to have a layout that corresponds to a layout of contacts on the UUT; and the electrical contacts (e.g., pins or pins receptacles) are arranged on the bottom of the fixture to have a layout that corresponds to a layout of contacts on part of the tester. The electrical contacts on the top and/or the bottom of the fixture may be, or include, one or more of contact pads, contact pins, pin receptacles, or any other appropriate mechanism that enables formation of an electrical connection. Pin receptacles are configured to receive, and to hold, pins to create electrical contact. In some implementations, the contacts may be added by pressing or otherwise incorporating the contacts into a resulting printed fixture or substrate. In any event, vias through substrate connect contacts on the top and bottom of the fixture.
As explained above, in some implementations, one or more of the conductive structures (e.g., the vias) comprises the conductive material surrounded, at least in part, by a dielectric material, and the dielectric material surrounded, at least in part, by conductive material. This may be achieved, for example, through appropriate accumulation of material during formation by additive manufacturing.
In some implementations, process 50 may include attaching a top plate to the resulting test fixture. As described with respect to
Test fixtures that utilize an additively-manufactured interface may be configured to support a range of interconnect paths, typically from as few as several hundred connections to as many as, e.g., 15,000, connections, and can help lower the recurring cost of in-circuit test cell on the manufacturer's PCB, or other, assembly line.
Testing performed by the example test system described herein may be implemented using hardware or a combination of hardware and software. For example, a test system like the ones described herein may include various controllers and/or processing devices located at various points in the system to control operation. A central computer may coordinate operation among the various controllers or processing devices.
The test system may be controlled by one or more computers, e.g., by sending signals to and from one or more wired and/or wireless connections to each test slot. The testing can be controlled, at least in part, using one or more computer program products, e.g., one or more computer program tangibly embodied in one or more non-transitory machine-readable media, for execution by, or to control the operation of, one or more data processing apparatus, e.g., a programmable processor, a computer, multiple computers, and/or programmable logic components.
A computer program can be written in any form of programming language, including compiled or interpreted languages, and it can be deployed in any form, including as a stand-alone program or as a module, component, subroutine, or other unit suitable for use in a computing environment. A computer program can be deployed to be executed on one computer or on multiple computers at one site or distributed across multiple sites and interconnected by a network.
Actions associated with implementing all or part of the testing can be performed by one or more programmable processors executing one or more computer programs to perform the functions described herein. All or part of the testing can be implemented using special purpose logic circuitry, e.g., an FPGA (field programmable gate array) and/or an ASIC (application-specific integrated circuit).
Processors suitable for the execution of a computer program include, by way of example, both general and special purpose microprocessors, and any one or more processors of any kind of digital computer. Generally, a processor will receive instructions and data from a read-only storage area or a random access storage area or both. Elements of a computer (including a server) may include one or more processors for executing instructions and one or more storage area devices for storing instructions and data. Generally, a computer will also include, or be operatively coupled to receive data from, or transfer data to, or both, one or more machine-readable storage media, such as mass storage devices for storing data, e.g., magnetic, magneto-optical disks, or optical disks. Machine-readable storage media suitable for embodying computer program instructions and data include all forms of non-volatile storage area, including by way of example, semiconductor storage area devices, e.g., EPROM, EEPROM, and flash storage area devices; magnetic disks, e.g., internal hard disks or removable disks; magneto-optical disks; and CD-ROM and DVD-ROM disks.
Any electrical connection involving transfer of signals may imply a direct physical connection or a wired or wireless connection that includes intervening components but that nevertheless allows electrical signals to flow between connected components. Any connection of electrical circuitry that enables signals to pass, unless stated otherwise, is an electrical connection and not necessarily a direct physical connection regardless of whether the word electrical is used to modify connection.
Elements of different implementations described herein may be combined to form other embodiments not specifically set forth above. Elements may be left out of the structures described herein without adversely affecting their operation. Furthermore, various separate elements may be combined into one or more individual elements to perform the functions described herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3516077 | Bobeck et al. | Jun 1970 | A |
3577131 | Morrow et al. | May 1971 | A |
3673433 | Kupfer | Jun 1972 | A |
3934236 | Aiken et al. | Jan 1976 | A |
4021790 | Aiken et al. | May 1977 | A |
4117543 | Minnick et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
4692839 | Lee et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4729166 | Lee et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4754546 | Lee et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4757256 | Whann et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4758785 | Rath | Jul 1988 | A |
4778950 | Lee et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4804132 | DiFrancesco | Feb 1989 | A |
4912399 | Greub et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4918383 | Huff et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4920574 | Yamamoto et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4922192 | Gross et al. | May 1990 | A |
4954873 | Lee et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4975638 | Evans et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
4980637 | Huff et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
5020219 | Leedy | Jun 1991 | A |
5072176 | Miller et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5083697 | Difrancesco | Jan 1992 | A |
5103577 | Michaels et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5132613 | Papae et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5180977 | Huff | Jan 1993 | A |
5264787 | Woith et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5355079 | Evans et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5378982 | Feigenbaum et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5416429 | McQuade et al. | May 1995 | A |
5422574 | Kister | Jun 1995 | A |
5456404 | Robinette, Jr. et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5468157 | Roebuck et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5469072 | Williams et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5623213 | Liu et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5914613 | Gleason et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5968282 | Yamasaka | Oct 1999 | A |
5973405 | Keukelaar et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6047469 | Luna | Apr 2000 | A |
6246245 | Akram et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6256882 | Gleason et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6307387 | Gleason et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6356098 | Akram et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6359337 | Keukelaar et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6437584 | Gleason et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6494734 | Shuey | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6499216 | Fjelstad | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6566898 | Theissen et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6578264 | Gleason et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6586955 | Fjelstad et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6633175 | Evans et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6661244 | McQuade et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6686732 | Parrish | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6690186 | Fjelstad | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6708386 | Gleason et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6756797 | Brandorff et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6825677 | Gleason et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6838890 | Tervo et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6860009 | Gleason et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6911835 | Chraft et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6927585 | Gleason et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6927586 | Thiessen | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6930498 | Tervo et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6965244 | Miller | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7084657 | Matsumura | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7109731 | Gleason et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7148711 | Tervo et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7161363 | Gleason et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7178236 | Gleason et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7227371 | Miller | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7233160 | Hayden et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7266889 | Gleason et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7271603 | Gleason et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7285969 | Hayden et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7304488 | Gleason et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7355420 | Smith et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7368927 | Smith et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7400155 | Gleason et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7403025 | Tervo et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7403028 | Campbell | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7417446 | Hayden et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7420381 | Burcham et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7427868 | Strid et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7436194 | Gleason et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7443181 | Miller | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7443186 | Strid et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7449899 | Campbell et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7453275 | Yamaguchi | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7453276 | Hayden et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7456646 | Hayden et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7482823 | Gleason et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7489149 | Gleason et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7492175 | Smith et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7495461 | Hayden et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7498829 | Gleason et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7501842 | Gleason et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7504842 | Schwindt | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7514944 | Smith et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7518387 | Gleason et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7533462 | Gleason et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7535247 | Andrews et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7541821 | Gleason et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7601039 | Eldridge et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7609077 | Campbell et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7619419 | Campbell | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7656172 | Andrews et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7681312 | Gleason et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7688097 | Hayden et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7723999 | Strid et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7750652 | Campbell | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7759953 | Strid et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7761983 | Hayden et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7761986 | Gleason et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7764072 | Strid et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7764075 | Miller | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7791361 | Karklin et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7800001 | Hamada et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7876114 | Campbell et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7888957 | Smith et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7893704 | Gleason et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7898273 | Gleason et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7898281 | Andrews et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7934944 | Hamada et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7934945 | Narita et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7940069 | Andrews et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
8013623 | Burcham et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8033838 | Eldridge et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8202684 | Hamada et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8373428 | Eldridge et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8410806 | Smith | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8451017 | Gleason et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
9435855 | Lewinnek et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9594114 | Sinsheimer | Mar 2017 | B2 |
20020195265 | Miller et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030122538 | Parrish et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040196025 | Casey et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050223543 | Cohen et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060043986 | Hembree | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060124927 | Groves et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070004238 | Breinlinger et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070007980 | Miller et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070103199 | Tzartzanis et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20080061808 | Mok et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080100323 | Mayder | May 2008 | A1 |
20080157809 | Peng et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080265919 | Izadian | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090033347 | Mineo et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20100231250 | Breinlinger et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110095778 | Chou et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110234249 | Uematsu et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120017428 | Hsu et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120034820 | Lang et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120094534 | Motohashi et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120175612 | Ding et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120196062 | Sato | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20130135002 | Grover et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20140253159 | DeMille | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150137848 | Lewinnek et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150377946 | Sinsheimer | Dec 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0298219 | Jan 1989 | EP |
0361779 | Apr 1990 | EP |
WO-8805544 | Jul 1988 | WO |
WO-2013134568 | Sep 2013 | WO |
WO-2015200066 | Dec 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Brunner et al., Electron-Beam MCM Testing and Probing, IEEE Transactions on Components, Packaging, Manufacturing Technology—Part B: Advanced Packaging, 17(1): 62-68 (1994). |
Chong et al., The Evolution of MCM Test from High Performance Bipolar Mainframe Multichip Modules to Low Cost Work Station Mulitchip Modules, ICEMM Proceedings '93, 404-410 (1993). |
Davidson, E., Design, Analysis, Applications, IEEE Transactions on Components, Packaging, Manufacturing Technology—Part B: Advanced Packaging, 17(1): 2 (1994). |
Doane, D.A., Foreword: Advancing MCM Technologies, IEEE Transactions on Components, Packaging, and Manufacturing Technology—Part B:Advanced Packaging, 17(1): 1 (1994). |
Economikos et al., Electrical Test ofMultichip Substrates, IEEE Transactions on Components, Packaging, Manufacturing Technology—Part B: Advanced Packaging, 17(1): 56-61 (1994). |
Fisher et al, Reducing Test Costs for High-Speed and High Pin-Count Devices, Probe Technology, 6 pages (Feb. 1992). |
Fresh Quest Corporation, Fresh Quest Corporation Announces the Deliver of QC2TM Bare Die Carriers and QPC™ Probe Cards for the Production of Known Good Die, Chandler, AZ, 4 pages (Jul. 1, 1994). |
Fresh Quest Corporation, Quest Pricing Guidelines, 1 page (1993-1994). |
Hewlett Packard, High Speed Wafer Probing with the HP 83000 Model F660, 1-16 (1993). |
Hughes Aircraft Company, Additional Technical Data for Hughes' Membrane Test Probe, Interconnect Systems Division, 1 page (1993). |
Hughes Aircraft Company, Membrane Wafer Probe—The Future of the IC Test Industry, 24 pages. |
International Search Report for PCT/US2014/063646, 3 pages (dated Jan. 28, 2015). |
International Search Report for PCT/US2015/036213, 3 pages (dated Sep. 25, 2015). |
Kister et al., Test Cost Reduction Using the Membrane Probe, Probe Technology, Santa Clara, CA, 6 pages. |
Marshall et al., CAD-Based Net Capacitance Testing of Unpopulated MCM Substrates, IEEE Transactions on Components, Packaging, Manufacturing Technology—Part B: Advanced Packaging, 17(1):50-55 (Feb. 1994). |
New Product Release: Reliant Switch for better RF testing, Dow Key.com (2010) URL: http://www.dowkey.com/news_details.php?id=110 [Retrieved on Feb. 3, 2015]. |
Packard Hughes Interconnect, Our New IC Membrane Test Probe. It's priced the Same, But It Costs Less., 1 page (1993). |
Packard Hughes Interconnect, Science Over Art, Our New IC Membrane Test Probe, 6 pages (1993). |
Probe Technology, Membrane Probe Card—The Concept, p. 7-18. |
Probe Technology, Prober Interface Unit for HP83000 Model—INT768, 2 pages. |
Ralston et al., Liquid-Metal Vertical Interconnects for Flip Chip Assembly of GaAs C-Band Power Amplifiers Onto Micro-Rectangular Coaxial Transmission Lines, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, 47(10): 2327-2334 (2012). |
Reid et al., Micromachined Rectangular-Coaxial Transmission Lines, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, 54(8): 3433-3442 (2006). |
Reliant Switch High Repeatability, DowKey.com, Data Sheet. URL: http://www.dowkey.com/_news_attach_files/0/_plk121_1_Reliant_Switch_Datasheet.pdf [Retrieved on Feb. 3, 2015]. |
Russell, T., Testing, IEEE Transactions on Components, Packaging, Manufacturing Technology—Part B: Advanced Packaging, 17(1):2 (Feb. 1994). |
West, et al., Principles of CMOS VLSI Design: A Systems Perspective, 2nd Ed., Chapter 8: 513-625 (1993). |
Written Opinion for PCT/US2014/063646, 10 pages (dated Jan. 28, 2015). |
Written Opinion for PCT/US2015/036213, 6 pages (dated Sep. 25, 2015). |
International Search Report for PCT/US2017/050695, ISA/KR, 3 pages (dated Dec. 20, 2017). |
Written Opinion for PCT/US2017/050695, ISA/KR, 8 pages (dated Dec. 20, 2017). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180095109 A1 | Apr 2018 | US |