This application is the U.S. national phase application of International Application No. PCT/SE2009/000470 filed Oct. 22, 2009.
The invention concerns a screw fastener testing methods for verifying that joint comprising a tightened screw fastener has been correctly in a tightened to either a point below yield according to a first method, or to a point beyond yield according to a second testing method. The invention also concerns a corresponding screw fastener testing tool.
Screw fastener joining of machine elements in practice results in subjecting the machine elements to a clamping force effectuated by one or more individual screw fasteners. The magnitude of the clamping force is dependent on screw fastener dimensions and to what extent the individual screw fastener is tightened, whereby typically reaching of a predetermined tightening torque shuts off the screw tightening tool.
A particular problem is encountered in connection with using screw fasteners for fastening of rigid machine elements such as e.g. rigid steel plates, to each other. The reason for this is that in such cases it might be the case that at the moment of screw driver shut down, because of reached target toque, the fastener is not sufficiently tightened for the machine elements to be fastened tightly against each other. Instead, in the region of the tightened screw fastener, there exists a certain play between the rigid plates because of lack of contact between them in that position. Screw fasteners tightened in such a way are problematic, since they are likely to prematurely break from fatigue due to the fact that a fluctuating load will be taken up by the fastener rather than reducing the clamp load between the parts.
In order to remedy this problem, it has been suggested to position shim elements between the metal plates in order to bridge the play. This method is, however inexact, unreliable and also labour intensive.
Another problem with previously known screw tightening systems is that friction occurring between surfaces of the screw fastener varies considerably, whereby the same shut off torque can lead to great variation of clamping force between different screw fasteners. Since the clamping force typically is realised to vary by 35%, a screw fastener is typically tightened to only part of its capacity, as an example not more than 60% of the theoretical capacity in production screw tightening. This means that the screw fastener has to be over-dimensioned to reach a predetermined clamping force.
As a remedy to this problem it has been suggested to tighten screw fasteners to a point beyond the yielding point, (i.e. where plastic deformation occurs). Hereby the advantage is achieved that 100% of the screw fastener capacity can be used. The clamping force also then typically only varies with the hardening of the material in the screw fastener, which gives smaller variations.
The problem is now to verify that the point beyond the yielding point has been reached. For that purpose different methods have been developed, wherein, the tightening tool includes a measuring gauge in order to secure tightening quality. Another solution is to measure permanent elongation of the screw fastener after loosening it which, however, can give erroneous results since the results depend on the accuracy of a test screw. This method is also labour intensive. Another method is ultra sound measuring.
The invention aims to provide a method and a device that can at least reduce problems of the prior art and to provide a method and tool that can be used easily also by not specially trained operators and that can be used for quick testing of readily tightened screw fasteners with high accuracy without loosening the screw.
These aims are obtained according to the invention through the features of the characterizing portions of the independent claims.
Hereby it can be unequivocally verified that firstly a screw fastener has been tightened correctly and that the machine elements, such as metal plates forming a joint, have been correctly clamped tightly against each other and secondly that a screw fastener has been tightened to a point beyond the yielding point.
The screw fastener can be subjected to a test interval with a rotational movement ΔΦ by means of a motor with transmission or simply by having the tool arranged with a sufficiently long handle portion for applying the rotational movement by the hand of the operator. The tool hereby includes a processing unit having circuitry and/or software for measuring angle and relative angle by which the fastener is rotated.
The torque, T, applied to the already tightened screw fastener, and the value of the derivative thereof, dT/dΦ, are measured by the tool during the test interval of rotational movement ΔΦ, which is a common operation for both methods, and wherein measured torque value, T, is compared with different stored values, dependent on which test method is chosen.
In accordance with the first test method, the measured torque value T, is compared with a stored torque value, (Tstart) for example corresponding to a medium region of the elastic deformation range for the tightened screw fastener, or corresponding to the intended torque level of the screw fastener to be tested. Further, measured or calculated dT/dΦ, value is compared with at least one stored dT/dΦ value, KR, which is related and close to (preferably just slightly below) the dT/dΦ value in the elastic deformation range for the tightened screw fastener. The tightened screw fastener is approved if measured or calculated dT/dΦ is equal to or above KR. Hereby incorrectly tightened screw fasteners related to machine elements with play between the elements are not approved, since it has been revealed that dT/dΦ for such screw fasteners is noticeably lower than the typical dT/dΦ value in the elastic deformation range.
In accordance with the second method the measured torque value T, is compared with at least one stored torque value, TE, corresponding to a region or preferably upper region of said elastic deformation range for the tightened screw fastener and measured or calculated dT/dΦ value is compared with at least one stored dT/dΦ value, KP, which is related to a lower plastic deformation range for the tightened screw fastener and clearly below a value for dT/dΦ, KE, in an elastic deformation range for the tightened screw fastener. The tightened screw fastener is approved if measured T exceeds TE, and measured or calculated dT/dΦ is below KP.
The screw fastener testing method according to the invention can be provided through a specific testing tool, for example a testing tool having features resembling an ordinary manually operated lever arm tightening tool but having the capability to derive T into dT/dΦ as a function of rotation angle Φ. According to the invention, the testing method can also be carried out in a modified screw tightening tool being equipped for performing a screw fastener testing mode thus being switchable between functioning as a fastener tightening tool and a fastener testing tool.
Further features and advantages are obtained in respect of the rest of the claims and will appear from the following detailed description.
The invention will now be described in greater detail at the background of embodiments and with reference to the annexed drawings, wherein
a and 1b in different use illustrate a screw fastener testing tool according to the invention,
The tool according to
In connection with the head 2 there is an engagement socket 3 for the engagement with the head of a screw fastener 4 to be tested. The tool further includes a handle portion 5 and a handle grip 6. Reference numeral 7 indicates a display capable of displaying measured torque, performed rotation angle and further parameters to be explained below. In
A processing unit (CPU) 30 is included in the tool and includes circuitry and/or software for parameter measuring, processing measured values, storing significant T, and K values for fasteners and applications, comparing unit(s) for comparing measured values with stored values and output unit(s) for emitting signals relating to result of comparison(s) by the comparing unit(s). 20 indicates a (e.g. green) lamp for emitting an approve signal and 21 indicates a (e.g. red) lamp for emitting a non approve signal.
In
According to the invention, and in order to verify if a screw fastener is correctly tightened, the testing tool 1 in
The values KR and Tstart are conveniently stored in a memory being included in the CPU of the tool 1 in
In
In an upper area of the elastic range of the torque curve, a point TE is identified, which is safely still within the elastic range but preferably at an upper region thereof. In the plastic deformation range, a point TP is identified which is safely within the plastic deformation range but also safely below a break load for the fastener.
In
Typically, TE, TP and KE are chosen based on tests on relevant fasteners in relevant applications. TE, TP and KE can also be calculated based on experience and available data about similar fasteners and similar applications.
According to the invention, and in order to verify if a screw fastener is correctly tightened, the testing tool 1 in
From the
The values KP, KE, TP, TE and Tmax are conveniently stored in a memory being included in the CPU 30 of the tool 1 in
In
In
The invention can be modified within the scope of the following claims.
The tool includes the following functional units: a device for subjecting the tightened screw fastener to a rotational movement which can be a motor or simply a handle operated by hand. A device for measuring the torque can be a common sensor known in the art of screw drivers. A device for measuring or calculating the value of the derivative of the torque, dT/dΦ, can be circuitry processing signals from a torque sensor and an angle counter. An evaluation device is conveniently realised as software in the CPU 30. First and second comparing units are simple logical components well known in the art.
The measured or calculated dT/dΦ value can be easily obtained by creating the derivative from measured torque and rotational angle. This is per se within the knowledge of the person skilled in the art.
It is preferred that screw fastener approval and/or non approval is followed by the tool emitting a particular visual or audible signal indicating the result from the evaluation device. As an alternative, the result can be viewed simply as digits or a curve on the tool display.
The CPU can be arranged outside the very tool and communicate with the tool over cable or wireless.
The tool can advantageously be equipped with a second memory and/or be connectable to central circuitry and central memory means for storing approve and not approved data for individual fasteners for documentation purposes.
The screw fastener testing method according to the invention can be provided through a specific testing tool, for example a testing tool having features resembling an ordinary manually operated lever arm tightening tool but having the capability to derive T into dT/dΦ as a function of rotation angle ΔΦ. The tool can preferably also be equipped with a switching means to enable the operator to choose between the to testing methods. According to the invention, the testing method can also be carried out in a modified screw tightening tool being equipped for performing a screw fastener testing mode thus being switchable between functioning as a fastener tightening tool and a fastener testing tool.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
0802247 | Oct 2008 | SE | national |
0802379 | Nov 2008 | SE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/SE2009/000470 | 10/22/2009 | WO | 00 | 5/4/2011 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2010/047638 | 4/29/2010 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3693726 | Hornig et al. | Sep 1972 | A |
3974883 | Sigmund | Aug 1976 | A |
3982419 | Boys | Sep 1976 | A |
4008772 | Boys | Feb 1977 | A |
4008773 | Wallace et al. | Feb 1977 | A |
4106176 | Rice et al. | Aug 1978 | A |
4244095 | Eshghy | Jan 1981 | A |
4268944 | Eshghy | May 1981 | A |
4316512 | Kibblewhite et al. | Feb 1982 | A |
4768388 | Fader et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
5637968 | Kainec et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
6539603 | Bulow | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6782594 | Shoberg | Aug 2004 | B2 |
7934428 | Schultz et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
4118595 | Dec 1992 | DE |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Feb. 11, 2010 (in English) in counterpart International Application No. PCT/SE2009/000470. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110247434 A1 | Oct 2011 | US |