This invention claims priority German Patent Application No. 10 2004 035 111.2, filed Jul. 20, 2004.
1. Technical Field
The invention relates to a device for testing the permeability of fluids and/or vapors through elastomeric seal bodies.
2. Related Art
As a consequence of new legislation, the permeation of substances through sealing systems has become an important consideration when developing new seal bodies. This applies not only to all the sealing zones in the motor area, for example in respect to fuel permeation, but also to the development of new systems such as fuel cells (hydrogen permeation). In the area of sealing technology permeation rates are currently measured mainly on material samples or by testing complete systems such as tank systems. Usually, a measuring chamber only allows one single sample to be analyzed at any one time. To obtain meaningful permeation data, measurements need to be performed over longer time periods, thereby maintaining the measuring devices occupied with a single analysis for a long time.
The VDA guideline 675245 (Elastomeric components in motor vehicles—Test procedures for determining characteristics: permeability of fluids and vapors through elastomers) describes a test device to measure permeation through material samples using a simple setup (cup test). In this test small containers are first filled with a test medium (e.g. regular fuel mixture). The disk shaped material sample is then introduced into a recess provided on the container. A lid facing the container and providing a screwed connection to it includes a recess on the side of the sample to incorporate a support filter screen aimed at absorbing the internal pressure on the sample, if the test is carried out at elevated temperatures. The lid is provided with a passage allowing the test medium to pass through. The procedure begins with the registration of the initial weight of the container, including its content. If the fluid or the vapor-air mixture escape through the material sample, a reduction of the starting weight will be registered. The weight difference is a direct function of the amount escaped through permeation. The VDA guideline deals exclusively with material samples with a thickness of 2+/−0.1 mm, which is not consistent with the real operating conditions of the respective seal body. The recess provided on the container for holding the material sample is 1.5 mm deep, meaning that the material sample needs to be compressed by 25% by tightening the planar face of the container and the planar face of the lid against each respective side of the material sample. The extent to which the fluid or vapor-air mixture passes through the sample depends on the size of the passage on the lid—which does not correlate with real operating conditions—and the measured value will therefore not apply to a seal body under real installation conditions.
It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide an improved device for measuring the permeability of fluids and/or vapors that will overcome the disadvantages of the state of the art by providing a measurement in correspondence with real applications, thus providing a basis for the development of new sealing systems for individual seal concepts.
This object and others become apparent as the specification progresses are accomplished by the invention, according to which a device for measuring the permeability of fluids and/or vapors through elastomeric seal bodies comprising a container incorporating a recess for holding a test medium, the recess being covered and closed off by a lid by way of screws fastening the lid to the said container, wherein the seal body is positionable between the end face of the container and the face of the lid, both surfaces being placed so as to face each other, and lockable in position by way of screws using a predetermined load force, and the test medium is measurable as it passes to the exterior through the remaining material thickness of the seal body through a seal gap between the surfaces.
Contrary to prior art in accordance with applicable VDA guidelines, this invention does not use any type of material samples with predetermined thicknesses but, instead, incorporates seal bodies which are intended for real applications between the end face of the container and the face of the lid. With the present invention it is possible to test seal bodies of any shape by adapting the corresponding end face of the container and/or the face of the lid to the individual application conditions. This applies in particular to the contour and roughness of the individual surface.
The standardized cup test, which can only compare material samples, provides a basis for the device presented in this invention, which provides a means of comparing different types of seal bodies (material+design). The device presented here also performs an analysis based on the qualitative measurement of the weight loss of the test medium. According to the present invention the proposed device deviates from the state of the art in that it tests the real seal concept with all the required influencing factors. The escape of the test medium must take place, as is the case in real applications, through the surface of the seal body in direct contact with the face(s) of the container/lid as well as the sealing material itself. The possibility exists to adjust a specific seal gap between the opposing faces in order to represent real tolerance conditions.
The test setup can take place at defined temperature conditions by placing the device in temperature chambers. The seal bodies used in the device presented in this invention are locked in place—as mentioned above—in devices adapted therefore or need to be specially fabricated. If the seal body is provided with seal lips, it is important to ensure that the effective diameter of the seal lips is identical for different test bodies in order to compare different concepts.
The devices are advantageously constructed in aluminum to avoid any permeation through the device itself. By using different materials for the container (e.g. synthetic materials instead of aluminum) it is possible to evaluate the influence of the system components' materials.
The device according to this invention provides the following advantages:
very simple test setup, enabling parallel comparative testing using several devices
the device can be exposed to high or low temperatures using simple means
it is possible to run so-called temperature profiles the seal gap can be modified to test different pressurization states of the seal body (simulation of system tolerances)
it is possible to modify the faces of the container and the lid (surface structure and roughness)
it is possible to modify the construction materials of the device to assess further system influences.
The present invention is shown by means of an exemplary embodiment in the appended drawings in which:
a to 1c illustrate elastomeric seal bodies of different configurations;
a to 2c illustrate a testing device comprising seal bodies incorporated therein, in accordance with
a to 1c show seal bodies 1, 1′, 1″ of different configurations.
The seal body 1 comprises a flat gasket with a metallic base body 2 providing a recess 3 which acts as a pass-through hole for the necessary stud-bolts.
The seal body 1 shown in this exemplary embodiment is of cylindrical cross section, with a seal element 5 being molded onto the outer perimeter surface 4 of the base body 2. The seal element includes undulating profiles 8, 9 on the area of both end surfaces 6, 7.
The seal body 1′, as shown in
c shows a seal body 1″ made of silicon material comprising an appendage 15 by means of which it can be introduced into a groove not shown here of a receiving body not shown here. Beads 17 have been molded on the seal area 16.
a to 2c show the device 18, according to the invention, comprising the same component parts, namely a container 20, including a recess 19, and a corresponding lid 21, completely covering and closing off the recess 19. The connection between the container 20 and the lid 21 is provided by embedded socket screws 22. The respective seal body 1, 1′, 1″ is seated externally of the recess 19 in the area between the two opposing faces 23, 24, one belonging to the container 20, the other belonging to the lid 21. In the exemplary embodiment the faces 23, 24 are planar, as shown in
On the lid side a circular groove 25 has been provided to accommodate the seal body 1″, as shown in
Tightening of the screws 22 elastically deforms the respective seal body 1, 1′ or 1″ in the corresponding way, leaving a seal gap 26 between the container 20 and the lid 21, which is determined by the remaining material thickness of the seal body 1, 1′, 1″, the height of said gap being dependent on the pre-load used. A test medium is situated in the recess 19, in the present case a regular fuel mixture that can fill the container 20 up to the height h. Contrary to prior art no samples with reduced thickness are being used but, instead, seal bodies 1, 1′ or 1″ accordant to the actual operating conditions are analyzed, whereby the test medium, as it cannot escape upwards, must pass through the seal gap 26 and the seal body 1, 1′, 1″ provided therein. It is therefore possible to examine the permeation of a test medium through the respective seal body 1, 1′, 1″ under conditions representing real operation conditions, thus providing important information relevant for the development of new sealing systems. The device 18 can be placed in a temperature chamber, if required, to simulate the real application conditions as, for example, encountered in an internal combustion engine or in an exhaust system.
Because the particular seal body 1, 1′, 1″ is clamped between the face surfaces 23, 24 to its full extent, no component parts such as support screens or others are required.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2004 035 111 | Jul 2004 | DE | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4047422 | Lyssy | Sep 1977 | A |
4170895 | Kliger | Oct 1979 | A |
4468951 | Garcia et al. | Sep 1984 | A |
5375453 | Rudd et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5408168 | Pfandler | Apr 1995 | A |
6335202 | Lee et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6467335 | Mizobe | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6779384 | Chun | Aug 2004 | B1 |
20040040372 | Plester et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20050223777 | Jensen et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1084960 | Mar 2001 | EP |
1 384 985 | Jan 2004 | EP |
2 345 144 | Jun 2000 | GB |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060032292 A1 | Feb 2006 | US |