This application is a 371 National Stage Filing of PCT application no. PCT/GB2018/050477, having an international filing date of Feb. 23, 2018, which claims priority to GB1703048.7, having a filing date of Feb. 24, 2017. Each of the foregoing disclosures, in its entirety, is incorporated herein by reference.
The present invention relates to a method of testing the rotor engagement of a rotary peristaltic pump, and particularly but not exclusively to a rotary peristaltic pump used in dialysis machinery.
Rotary peristaltic pumps are a common type of positive displacement pump used for pumping a variety of fluids. The fluid is pumped by subjecting a flexible tube arranged in a race to a series of successive compressions which act to drive the fluid along the tube.
A common mechanism to provide this successive compression force is to arrange tubing in a race formed by a hollow chamber having a U-shaped end, and to trap the tubing between a rotor having a plurality of protrusions and the wall of the pump race. As such, when the rotor is turned, the protrusions of the rotor compress a portion of tubing and move along the tubing squeezing the contained fluid along.
Typically, there are two or three protrusions attached to the rotor, and on the end of each protrusion there is generally a wheel or roller which engages with the flexible tubing.
Typically, the protrusion is moveable relative to the rotor and is biased away from the drive axis of rotation of the rotor by a spring.
For the rotary peristaltic pump to pump correctly, the flexible tubing must be squeezed or occluded sufficiently to prevent the escape or backflow of the fluid contained within the flexible tube.
This is particularly important when the rotary peristaltic pump is being used in a dialysis machine. This is because proper functioning of the dialysis machine relies on sufficient downstream pressure. Should the rollers on the end of the protrusions not sufficiently occlude the flexible tube there will be a lack of pressure generated downstream of the rotary peristaltic pump, potentially inhibiting proper functioning of the dialysis machine.
In addition, with the rollers correctly occluding the flexible tubing, the effect of a failure elsewhere in a dialysis machine can be mitigated since the occlusion of the flexible tubing interrupts the free flow of fluid therethrough.
An inability of the rollers effectively to occlude the flexible tube may be caused by a number of factors. In one instance, a deformity in the outer race against which the flexible tubing is pressed by the roller to create an occlusion may prevent complete occlusion. In another instance, the biasing spring which acts upon the roller to create an occluding force may fatigue and the spring rate decrease thereby reducing the effectiveness of the spring in creating an occlusion. In yet another instance the flexible tubing may split and leak.
Furthermore, the flexible tubing may become less compliant due to environmental factors such as low temperatures, thereby inhibiting the roller from correctly occluding the flexible tubing due to increased stiffness of the tube. The flexible tubing may also become less compliant due to the flexible tubing becoming fatigued.
The object of the present invention is to provide an improved method of testing the engagement of a rotary peristaltic pump.
A method for testing the rotor engagement and resulting occlusion of a flexible tube in a rotary peristaltic pump is provided to ensure correct occlusion of a flexible tube and correct operation of the peristaltic pump.
According to the present invention, there is provided a method of testing the rotor engagement of a peristaltic pump, the method comprising the steps of:
a) providing a pump system comprising a peristaltic pump rotor, a tube, a valve, a pressure sensor, a comparator, and a processor, wherein the valve is situated on the tube downstream of the peristaltic pump rotor, the pressure sensor is arranged to sense the fluid pressure in the tube at a position downstream of the peristaltic pump rotor and upstream of the valve, the peristaltic pump rotor including at least one member having a tube contact portion, the at least one member being rotatable about a drive axis to move the tube contact portion along an arcuate path, the tube contact portion being configured to occlude the tube;
b) providing a fluid in the tube;
c) arranging the pump system such that the valve is open, the peristaltic pump rotor is inactive and the tube contact portion is occluding the tube;
d) closing the valve;
e) actuating the peristaltic pump rotor from a first rotor position to a second rotor position such that the peristaltic pump rotor is angularly displaced about the drive axis by a predetermined priming angular displacement;
f) holding the peristaltic pump rotor in the second rotor position for a holding interval of predetermined duration;
g) using the pressure sensor to measure maximum pressure of the fluid in the tube downstream of the peristaltic pump rotor during and/or after completing step e);
h) using the pressure sensor to measure any pressure drop in the fluid in the tube downstream of the peristaltic pump rotor during the holding interval;
i) using the processor to generate an alert signal if the maximum pressure recorded in step g) is below a first predetermined threshold value and/or the pressure drop measured in step h) is above a second predetermined threshold value;
The method may further comprise step j), wherein step j) comprises opening the valve and using the pressure sensor to determine when the fluid pressure in the tube is lower than a third predetermined threshold.
The collated and or recorded data may be used for interrogating the function of the rotary peristaltic pump.
Steps d) to j) may repeated a primary predetermined number of times to test the peristaltic pump rotor in a number positions thereby improving the accuracy of the test. Preferably the primary predetermined number of times is two.
The method may further comprise step k), wherein step k) comprises actuating the peristaltic pump rotor such that the peristaltic pump rotor may be angularly displaced about the drive axis by a predetermined switchover angle. The predetermined switchover angle may be in the range of 10 to 170 degrees. Preferably, the predetermined switchover angle is 60 degrees. Providing a switchover angle of 60 degrees increases efficiency by optimising the method so that each of the members is tested three times at different angular positions relative to the drive axis when two members are provided. Angularly displacing the peristaltic pump rotor by a switchover angle facilitates the testing of the tube with the peristaltic pump rotor in different positions. By adjusting the magnitude of the predetermined switchover angle, each roller of the pump rotor may be tested in different positions relative to the drive axis to test that the members and related tube contact portion are occluding the tube correctly and that there are no leaks.
Pressure drop may be defined in terms of an absolute value or in terms of rate of change of the pressure. That is the absolute value of the change in pressure divided by the time over which that change took place. The second predetermined threshold value may be an absolute e.g. 100 mmHg or a rate of change e.g. 10 mm Hgmms−1 depending on how the pressure drop is measured.
Following the completion of step k), steps d) to j) may be repeated a secondary predetermined number of times. The secondary predetermined number of times is preferably three.
The predetermined holding interval may be in the range of 5 to 60 seconds. Preferably, the predetermined holding interval is 10 seconds.
The first predetermined threshold value may be in the range of 75 mmHg (9999.18 Pa) to 1500 mmHg (199983.59 Pa). Preferably, the first predetermined threshold value is 200 mmHg (2664.48 Pa).
The second predetermined threshold value may be in the range of 50 mmHg (6666.12 Pa) to 1475 mmHg (196650.53) or alternatively in the range of 0.83 mmHgs−1 (111.10 Pas−1) to 295 mmHgs−1 (39330.11 Pas−1). Preferably, the second predetermined threshold value is 175 mmHg (23331.42 Pa), alternatively the second predetermined threshold value is 17.5 mmHgs−1 (2333.14 Pas−1).
The third predetermined threshold value may be in the range of 0 mmHg (0 Pa) to 1450 mmHg (193317.47 Pa). Preferably, the third predetermined threshold value is 75 mmHg (9999.18 Pa).
The predetermined priming angular displacement may be in the range of 10 to 350 degrees. Preferably, the predetermined priming angular displacement is 240 degrees.
The processor may be used to generate a pass signal if no alert signals are generated.
The alert signal may be used to generate an alarm signal. The alarm signal may be generated by a signal generator and the generated alarm signal may be audio and/or visual.
The method may be terminated when an alert signal is generated.
The fluid being pumped may be blood or the fluid being pumped may be saline solution or another type of fluid used in blood dialysis.
The tube may be held within a U-Shaped channel in an outer race of a housing.
The pump system may automatically run the method when the pump system is activated.
The valve may be a pinch clamp which may be configured to occlude the tube.
The tube contact portion may comprise a roller.
There may be two members provided and the two members may be diametrically opposed.
There may be three members provided and the three members may be equally spaced angularly about the drive axis.
The invention will now be described with reference to the accompanying drawings.
In
The rotary peristaltic pump 10 comprises a tube 12, a pump housing 14, a peristaltic pump rotor 16, a sensor module 18 and a valve 20.
The tube 12 is elongate and has an inlet 22 at its upstream end and an outlet 24 at its downstream end. The tube 12 is made from a flexible material such as medical grade polyvinylchloride.
The pump housing 14 comprises a structure with a U-shaped wall 30 defining a U-shaped space 32 and a drive shaft 34. The pump housing 14 is manufactured using high pressure injection moulding of plastic. The drive shaft 34 protrudes through a back wall 50 of the pump housing 14 and is configured to be driven by a motor (not shown). The drive shaft 34 defines a drive axis A.
The peristaltic pump rotor 16, in this simplified embodiment comprises a hub 36 and two, diametrically opposed arms 38, 40 arranged on either side of the hub 36 and projecting therefrom. Each arm has a tube contact portion in the form of a roller 42, 44 arranged respectively at the projecting end thereof.
The sensor module 18 comprises a sensor housing 26 and a pressure sensor 28. The sensor housing 26 is made from injection moulded plastic. The pressure sensor 28 is an electromagnetic pressure sensor 28, for example as described in WO2011027117A3.
The valve 20 is a pinch clamp type valve and has bicuspid structures 46, 48 that are moveable between an open and a closed position.
The tube 12 extends from the inlet 22 into the sensor housing 26 of the sensor module 18, passing next into the pump housing 14 and is arranged to follow the U-shaped wall 30 before emerging from the pump housing 14 to extend through sensor housing 26 of the sensor module 18 and to the outlet 24.
The peristaltic pump rotor 16 is arranged within the pump housing 14 on the drive shaft 34 which is arranged at a position in the housing such that, with the hub 36 affixed to the drive shaft 34 and the tube 12 following the U-shaped wall 30, the rollers 42, 44 on the arms 38, 40 occlude the tube 12 completely by compressing the tube 12 between the respective roller 42 or 44 and the U-shaped wall 30.
The pressure sensor 28 is positioned in the sensor housing 26 on a portion of the tube 12 that is downstream of the pump housing 14.
The valve 20 is arranged on the tube 12 downstream of the pump housing 14 and the sensor module 18. The valve 20 has two states: open or closed. When the valve 20 is open, the valve 20 does not occlude the tube 12. When the valve 20 is closed, the valve 20 occludes the tube 12.
In operation, the rotary peristaltic pump 10 works as follows.
Fluid enters the tube 12 at the inlet 22, for example by connection of the inlet 22 to an artery and flows in the direction indicated by the arrow X. The fluid flows along the tube 12 and into the part of the tube 12 which enters the pump housing 14. The fluid follows the U-shaped wall 30 of the pump housing 14 before exiting the pump housing 14. The fluid continues along the tube 12 entering into the sensor housing 26 and passing the pressure sensor 28. The fluid next passes through the valve 20.
The fluid is drawn into the tube 12 due to the rotation of the peristaltic pump rotor 16 and the sequential occlusion of the tube 12 by the rollers 42, 44 at the ends of the diametrically opposed arms 38, 40.
In more detail, the motor (not shown), is configured to drive the hub 36 such that the hub 36 rotates clockwise about the drive axis A. As the arms 38, 40 are rigidly attached to the hub 36, the arms 38, 40 are also rotated about the drive axis A. The rollers 42, 44 positioned at the end of each arm are thus moved along an arcuate path. As the rollers 42, 44 are rotated about the drive axis A, they act on the tube 12 to sequentially occlude the tube 12 alternately with each half rotation of the hub 36. The sequential occlusion of the tube 12 by the rollers 42, 44 draws fluid from the inlet 22 of the tube 12 upstream of the pump housing 14 and pushes the fluid out of the pump housing 14 towards the outlet 24 of the tube 12.
When the valve 20 is open, the pressure of the fluid in the tube 12 upstream and downstream of the pump housing 14 will be substantially the same. However, when the valve 20 is closed and the peristaltic pump rotor 16 is actuated, i.e. driven to rotate by the motor, the fluid downstream of the pump housing 14 has nowhere to flow to. As such, the pressure of the fluid upstream of the valve 20 and downstream of the pump housing 14 increases.
As the pressure sensor 28 is arranged on the tube 12 between the valve 20 and the pump housing 14, the pressure rise caused by the pumping action of the peristaltic pump rotor 16 and the occlusion of the tube 12 by the valve 20, can be measured.
As will be appreciated the rotary peristaltic pump 10 of the present invention can form part of a larger system such as a pump system 11 of a dialysis machine 50.
In
The dialysis machine 50 includes a pump system 11 and a processor 54. The pump system 11 includes the rotary peristaltic pump 10, a comparator 52, and a processor 54. The rotary peristaltic pump 10 includes the pressure sensor 28.
The comparator is configured to monitor the pressure data measured by the pressure sensor 28 and to provide an output signal 58 accordingly, and the processor 54 is arranged to receive the output signal 58.
The processor 54 is configured to interpret the output signal 58 and provide an alert signal 60 to the signal generator 56, accordingly, the signal generator 56 is configured to generate audible/visible warnings or alarms 62 when the recorded pressure data falls outside the predetermined parameters.
The alert signal 60 can also be an “everything is functioning correctly” or a “pass” signal, following the data capture of a pressure reading.
The method of the present invention operates as follows:
Referring to
The valve 20 is actuated such that its state is changed from open to closed, this is the initial closing of the valve 20 (step d) in the claimed method).
The motor is operated to rotate the peristaltic pump rotor 16, that is, the hub 36, the arms 38, 40 and, the rollers 42, 44 about the drive axis A, thereby moving the rollers 42, 44 from the initial position shown in
The maximum pressure of the fluid in the tube 12 downstream of the occlusion caused by the roller 44 of the peristaltic pump rotor 16 and upstream of the valve 20 is measured by the pressure sensor 28 and recorded by a CPU 54 or processor.
The rollers 42, 44 are held by the motor in stasis in the position shown in
The pressure sensor 28 is configured to continually measure the pressure in the tube 12 downstream of the peristaltic pump rotor 16 and upstream of the valve 20 during the holding interval. The pressure readings are collected by the comparator 52. From the pressure sensor data recorded the maximum pressure of the fluid following the rotation of the peristaltic pump rotor 16 and any pressure drop in the fluid in the tube 12 during the holding interval can be calculated.
In the scenario where no alert signals are generated by the signal generator the method will continue uninterrupted.
The rotary pump is held in stasis and the valve 20 is opened to release the pressure generated in the fluid in the tube 12 during actuation of the peristaltic pump rotor 16. The method will not proceed until the pressure in the fluid in the tube 12 is less than the third predetermined threshold value of approximately 75 mmHg.
To test the correct occlusion of the tube 12 by the rollers 42, 44 in more depth the method can be repeated as follows:
Following the opening of the valve 20 and after the third predetermined threshold value has been passed, the valve 20 is once again closed (step d) of the claimed method) and the scenario described above, following the initial closing of the valve 20 is repeated twice more.
Following the first repeat, the peristaltic pump rotor 16 will be in the position shown in
Following the operation of the rotary peristaltic pump 10 as described above, the peristaltic pump rotor 16 will be in the position shown in
The valve 20 is then closed and the peristaltic pump rotor 16 rotated by a predetermined switchover angle of 60 degrees (step k) of the claimed method). The test method described above is then repeated. This switchover rotation has the effect of switching the position of the peristaltic pump rotor 16 such that the roller 42 that has been tested at one angular displacement, can be tested at a further two angular displacements such that each of the rollers 42, 44 is tested at three different angular displacements, i.e. in three different angular positions relative to the drive axis A.
Generation of Alerts
At any point, if an alert signal 60 is generated by the CPU 54, the test cycle is ended and a fault displayed on an LCD screen (not shown) on the pump system 11.
If the roller 44 is defective or for some other reason cannot correctly occlude the flexible tube 12, there will be a pressure drop in the fluid downstream of the peristaltic pump rotor 16 and upstream of the valve 20 which will be measured by the pressure sensor 28 and/or a minimum operating pressure will not be reached.
In particular:—
If during the initial rotation of the peristaltic pump rotor 16, from the position shown in
If during any rotation of the peristaltic pump rotor 16 immediately prior to a holding interval the pressure is not greater than the first predetermined threshold value, an alert signal will be generated.
If any measured pressure drop detected by the pressure sensor 28 is greater than a second predetermined threshold value, then it can be concluded that the roller 44 is not correctly occluding the tube 12 when the peristaltic pump rotor 16 is in this specific position during the holding interval for which the pressure drop is being measured. Specifically, if the calculated pressure drop during a particular holding interval, of e.g. 10 seconds, is in excess of 175 mmHg from the maximum recorded pressure, an alert signal will be generated.
The skilled person will recognise that the angular rotations of the rollers 42, 44 described above are the most efficient way of testing a two-arm rotary peristaltic pump 10, and the occlusion of two rollers 42, 44 in three different positions in the outer race. The skilled person will recognise that a more detailed test may be carried out by testing each roller 42, 44 in four or more positions in the outer race and will select an angular displacement suitable for such a test.
The skilled person will also recognise that this test method is applicable to rotary peristaltic pumps 10 with one or more than two rollers 42, 44 and/or one or more than two arms 38, 40, and that application of the method would require recalculation of the angular displacements for rotary peristaltic pumps 10 with more than two arms and/or rollers.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1703048 | Feb 2017 | GB | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/GB2018/050477 | 2/23/2018 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2018/154317 | 8/30/2018 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3774762 | Lichtenstein | Nov 1973 | A |
4161264 | Malmgren | Jul 1979 | A |
4353990 | Manske et al. | Oct 1982 | A |
4366061 | Papanek et al. | Dec 1982 | A |
4599165 | Chevallet | Jul 1986 | A |
D308249 | Buckley | May 1990 | S |
4969991 | Valadez | Nov 1990 | A |
5000664 | Lawless et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5032265 | Jha et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5055198 | Shettigar | Oct 1991 | A |
5103211 | Daoud et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5252213 | Ahmad et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
D341890 | Sievert et al. | Nov 1993 | S |
D344339 | Yoshikawa et al. | Feb 1994 | S |
D351470 | Scherer et al. | Oct 1994 | S |
5421823 | Kamen et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5476792 | Ezrielev et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
D370979 | Pascale et al. | Jun 1996 | S |
5591344 | Kenley et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5643201 | Peabody et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5658456 | Kenley et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5665307 | Kirschner et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5807322 | Lindsey | Sep 1998 | A |
5948247 | Gillerfalk et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6126831 | Goldau et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6153102 | Kenley et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6251279 | Peterson et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6514462 | Simons | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6558347 | Jhuboo | May 2003 | B1 |
6663829 | Kjelistrand | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6967002 | Edgson et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
7107837 | Lauman et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7284964 | McDowell | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7648627 | Beden et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7896197 | Furey | Mar 2011 | B2 |
D641882 | Hickey et al. | Jul 2011 | S |
8535525 | Heyes et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
D693469 | Chung et al. | Nov 2013 | S |
8685244 | Heyes et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
D724740 | Collins et al. | Mar 2015 | S |
9220825 | Buckberry | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9744285 | Heyes et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9833553 | Higgitt et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
10456516 | Heyes et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10543305 | Buckberry et al. | Jan 2020 | B2 |
D907211 | Spurling | Jan 2021 | S |
10881775 | Wallace | Jan 2021 | B2 |
10960120 | Wallace et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
20030217962 | Childers et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040195157 | Mullins et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040206703 | Bosetto et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040215129 | Edgson et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040223857 | Kline | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050020961 | Burbank et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050205476 | Chevallet et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050209547 | Burbank et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050234384 | Westberg | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060121623 | He et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070083193 | Werneth et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20080283096 | Scheringer et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090007642 | Busby et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090009290 | Kneip et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090012450 | Shan et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090012452 | Slepicka et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090012457 | Childers et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090101550 | Muller et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090211975 | Brugger et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090230043 | Heyes et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100043694 | Patel | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100045471 | Meyers | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100089807 | Heyes et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100139254 | Sebestyen et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100263687 | Braun et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110009797 | Kelly et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110034850 | Jonsson | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110132838 | Curtis et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110168614 | Pouchoulin et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20120164022 | Muginstein et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120292237 | Heyes et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120308431 | Kotsos et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130056419 | Curtis | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130153495 | Kelly et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130199998 | Kelly et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130274642 | Soykan et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140224736 | Heide | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140251885 | Heyes | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140299544 | Wilt et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150027951 | Wallace et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150076053 | Higgitt et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150112119 | Buckberry | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150129481 | Higgitt et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150238673 | Gerber et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150258263 | Hogard | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150359954 | Gerber et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160045656 | Buckberry | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160051743 | Buckberry | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160058933 | Ballantyne et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20170252498 | Heyes et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20180133391 | Heyes et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180154059 | Heyes et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180344915 | Wallace | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190001042 | Buckberry | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190015577 | Garrido et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190024654 | May et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190358381 | Westenbrink | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190374698 | Buckberry et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20200030515 | Merchant | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200268958 | Heyes et al. | Aug 2020 | A1 |
20200276372 | Milad et al. | Sep 2020 | A1 |
20200330671 | Buckberry et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20220001087 | Heyes et al. | Jan 2022 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
10024447 | Nov 2001 | DE |
0165751 | Dec 1985 | EP |
2219703 | Aug 2010 | EP |
2955512 | Dec 2015 | EP |
H04266740 | Sep 1992 | JP |
H06261872 | Sep 1994 | JP |
H07174659 | Jul 1995 | JP |
2000130334 | May 2000 | JP |
WO 8101800 | Jul 1981 | WO |
WO 9506205 | Mar 1995 | WO |
95025893 | Sep 1995 | WO |
WO 2000006217 | Feb 2000 | WO |
WO 2003101510 | Dec 2003 | WO |
WO 2006120415 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO 2006120417 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO 2009061608 | May 2009 | WO |
2013057109 | Apr 2013 | WO |
WO 2013110906 | Aug 2013 | WO |
WO 2013110919 | Aug 2013 | WO |
WO 2013114063 | Aug 2013 | WO |
WO 2013121162 | Aug 2013 | WO |
WO 2013121163 | Aug 2013 | WO |
2014072195 | May 2014 | WO |
WO 2014155121 | Oct 2014 | WO |
WO 2015007596 | Jan 2015 | WO |
WO 2015022537 | Feb 2015 | WO |
WO 2016016870 | Feb 2016 | WO |
WO 2017137723 | Aug 2017 | WO |
WO 2018115816 | Jun 2018 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Search Report for application GB1703048.7, dated Aug. 24, 2017. |
Search Report and Written Opinion for International Applicaiton No. PCT/GB2018/050477, dated Apr. 26, 2018. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190376504 A1 | Dec 2019 | US |