The present invention relates to sustainable energy sources, and more particularly to a tethered air vehicle having at least one wind turbine for energy conversion.
Movement of air in the atmosphere from areas of high pressure to areas of low pressure is a source of clean, sustainable energy for meeting a portion of the world's growing energy needs. Commercial utilization of wind energy has steadily increased over the past few decades, but is well shy of providing a significant percentage of global electrical power demand. Ground-based wind turbines have grown in size from the 100 kilowatt class to the multi-megawatt class. However, the amortized cost per kilowatt-hour for terrestrial wind turbines has recently stagnated. New, larger wind turbines require extremely large cranes for tower, nacelle, and blade installation. The rotor blades must be transported in sections on long flat bed trucks.
Modern large terrestrial wind turbines utilize either extremely heavy step-up gearboxes that have input torques in the millions of pound-feet and drive one or more generators at moderate speed, or do not utilize a gearbox and directly drive an extremely large and heavy generator at low speed. Gearbox reliability is low, and maintenance costs are high. These factors have set a cannot-be-lower-than value for the cost per kilowatt-hour for terrestrial wind power systems.
Therefore, it would be desirable to provide an effective wind turbine energy conversion device that is relatively inexpensive to manufacture, deploy, and maintain. It would also be desirable for the device to be able to be utilized in locations that are impractical for ground-based wind turbines.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a wind turbine energy conversion device that can take advantage of the higher speed and more persistent winds at altitudes above traditional ground-based wind turbines. Equipment for extracting wind energy at higher levels of the atmosphere can be made significantly smaller, lighter, and more reliable than terrestrial wind power equipment.
In an apparatus according to a first embodiment, an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) is connected to one end of a tether, the other end being connected to a terrestrial anchorage point on land or sea. The UAV flies at altitudes where wind speeds are typically 40 mph or higher. The UAV comprises a flying wing with one trailing wind turbine. An appreciable amount of electric power is generated by performing in-flight maneuvers that serve to increase the relative wind speed to about four times the true wind speed. Equipment coupled to the terrestrial anchorage point receives the generated power through conductors embedded within the tether. A lighter-than-air object may be included, attached along the tether, to provide lift to a portion of the tether.
In an apparatus according to a second embodiment, the UAV comprises a flying wing with two trailing wind turbines.
In an apparatus according to a third embodiment, the UAV comprises a flying wing with two trailing wind turbines and one leading wind turbine.
In an apparatus according to a fourth embodiment, the UAV comprises a flying wing with a single ducted wind turbine.
In an apparatus according to a fifth embodiment, the UAV comprises a flying wing with a single leading wind turbine.
In an apparatus according to a sixth embodiment, the UAV comprises a flying wing with a single trailing wind turbine and spool motors for adjusting the effective tether attachment point.
These as well as other aspects, advantages, and alternatives will become apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art by reading the following detailed description, with reference where appropriate to the accompanying drawings. Further, it should be understood that this summary and other descriptions and figures provided herein are intended to illustrate the invention by way of example only and, as such, that numerous variations are possible. For instance, structural elements and process steps can be rearranged, combined, distributed, eliminated, or otherwise changed, while remaining within the scope of the invention as claimed.
Wind power per unit area increases by the cube of the wind speed. Usable power potentially available in the wind is described by the following equation:
where P=power in watts, α=an efficiency factor determined by the design of the turbine, ñ=mass density of air in kilograms per cubic meter, r=radius of the wind turbine in meters, and v=velocity of the air in meters per second.
The present invention exploits the fact that average wind speed increases and becomes more persistent as altitude increases. Therefore, if wind turbines can be placed at altitude, they can be made smaller than terrestrial wind turbines for the same power output due to the significantly higher average wind speeds as altitude increases.
As an example, at ground level, a wind turbine with 1 megawatt power output has a rotor diameter of approximately 210 feet and a gearbox input torque of 320,000 lb-ft. At altitude, a wind turbine with the same 1 megawatt power output has a rotor diameter of approximately 18 feet and a gearbox input torque of 7,800 lb-ft. The 18-foot diameter rotor has a rotational speed of approximately 900 rpm, compared to 24 rpm for the ground-based turbine. Because the rotor operates at higher speed and lower torque, the step-up gearbox is significantly lighter and more compact than the gearbox for the ground-based wind turbine. The output speed of the compact gearbox is approximately 15,000 rpm. This high output speed drives a light weight, compact wound field generator that produces 1 megawatt of continuous electrical power.
The preferred tether construction is a single composite cable comprised of two insulated aluminum conductors and a high-strength fiber such as Spectra® fiber, a polyethylene fiber available from Honeywell International Inc. High voltage transmission minimizes resistive losses. A small amount of resistive heating helps prevent ice buildup as the cable transits altitudes conducive to icing. Electrical losses from the generation point to the ground may be as high as 15%, depending on tether length. The tether is constructed to have an outside diameter of less than ¾ inch for the airborne wind turbine concept described herein. Tether strength must take into account the high vehicle lift created while the vehicle is flying a circular or figure-eight trajectory.
Also shown in
The UAV 102 is essentially a high lift, high performance flying wing with integral wind turbines.
Trailing wind turbines are preferred to leading wind turbines for several reasons. First, trailing turbines will have a minimal effect on airflow over the top and bottom airfoil surface and a negligible effect on the lift of the vehicle. A leading turbine will extract energy from the air that passes through the rotor thus decreasing the velocity of the air flowing over the airfoil and reducing the lift. Second, trailing turbines will increase overall stability since the drag created by them is behind the vehicle. Drag which leads the vehicle, as is the case with a leading turbine, will decrease stability. However, a leading turbine could be used to move the center-of-gravity forward of the vehicle and remove the need for a center-of-gravity adjusting ballast. This is illustrated in
In the above embodiments, it may desirable to have the capacity to adjust the effective attachment point of the tether to the air vehicle in order to provide better in-flight control, especially during the figure-eight maneuvers.
The flight components associated with these above embodiments include left and right pairs of elevon control surfaces on the trailing edge of the left and right sides of the wing, a flight control system, a stability augmentation system, a guidance and navigation system, a transponder, position and navigation lighting, and a collision avoidance system, for avoiding collisions with other wind-turbine air vehicles and/or other aircraft in general. Certain other components such as communications or intelligence surveillance equipment may be included in the system as well without departing from the scope of the invention.
The left and right sides of the wing include inboard and outboard elevons that combine the functions of flight vehicle ailerons and elevators. If both elevons on one side of the wing move in the opposite direction from the elevons on the other side of the wing, they serve as ailerons and control vehicle roll. If all four elevons move up or down in unison, they serve as elevators and control vehicle pitch. Any combination of pitch and roll may be commanded by independent control of each elevon. Yaw may be produced when the elevons on one side of the wing move in opposite directions. This increases drag on half of the wing, thus inducing yaw. Vehicle yaw may also be provided by differentially changing the drag produced by the wind turbines located at the vehicle wing tips. Slight changes in the pitch of each trailing rotor will cause slight changes in yaw that together with roll is required for turning (banking) the vehicle in a coordinated manner. This is especially important when the vehicle makes tight, high-G turns during the figure-eight maneuver.
Other traditional control authority devices can also be used such as spoilers, leading edge flaps, speed brakes, and rudders on the winglets.
The rotor 902 is preferably a two-bladed, high-strength, light-weight carbon fiber and epoxy assembly. The root of each rotor blade is attached to a hub 908 that contains the rotor pitch control mechanism 903.
The rotor pitch control mechanism 903 controls rotor blade pitch from the full feathered position to the full flat pitch position. This device is similar to what is currently used in conventional turboprop-powered aircraft. The rotor pitch control mechanism 903 is spring-loaded to the feathered position (blades trailing with respect to air flow). Oil pressure from the lubrication system provides the source of fluid pressure for pitch control actuation. In the event of loss of oil pressure, the rotor blades 902 feather, rotation stops, and power-generation ceases. This prevents a catastrophic failure of the rotating components including the gearbox 904 and generator 905.
A brake can be used to lock the rotor in the stowed position and ensure that it does not drift. The two-bladed rotor 902 will be stowed in the parallel-to-the-wing (horizontal) position for takeoff and landing to prevent potential damage. The brake is also used to lock down a rotor 902 in the event the sister rotor becomes disabled. This helps to preclude any differential drag that may adversely affect vehicle flight stability.
Using the generator 905 as a motor is one method in which the UAV can reach an appropriate altitude. Typical power flow through the conductors in the tether is reversed and the wind turbines act as propellers as the UAV launches and ascends toward altitude. Another method in which the UAV can reach altitude is by having the aerostat provide the necessary lift. In a third method, a helicopter or other manned or unmanned craft could release it from the desired altitude.
An included lubrication and cooling system is preferred. The lubrication system provides oil lubrication to gearbox and generator internal bearings and gears. The system preferably includes an air-to-liquid heat exchanger that maintains oil temperature within normal operating limits. The lubrication system also provides oil pressure to the rotor pitch control actuator.
Various arrangements and embodiments in accordance with the present invention have been described herein. It will be appreciated, however, that those skilled in the art will understand that changes and modifications may be made to these arrangements and embodiments as well as combinations of the various embodiments without departing from the true scope and spirit of the invention, which is defined by the following claims.
The present application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/082,031 filed on Jul. 18, 2008 entitled “Tethered Autonomous Air Vehicle with Wind Turbine”, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein for all purposes.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3954236 | Brown | May 1976 | A |
4076190 | Lois | Feb 1978 | A |
4084102 | Fry et al. | Apr 1978 | A |
4166596 | Mouton et al. | Sep 1979 | A |
4251040 | Loyd | Feb 1981 | A |
4285481 | Biscomb | Aug 1981 | A |
4309006 | Biscomb | Jan 1982 | A |
4486669 | Pugh | Dec 1984 | A |
4491739 | Watson | Jan 1985 | A |
4572962 | Shepard | Feb 1986 | A |
4659940 | Shepard | Apr 1987 | A |
4664340 | Jackson | May 1987 | A |
4748808 | Hill | Jun 1988 | A |
4832571 | Carrol | May 1989 | A |
5040948 | Harburg | Aug 1991 | A |
5150857 | Moffitt et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5152478 | Cycon et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5295643 | Ebbert et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5575438 | McGonigle et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5607122 | Hicks et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5695153 | Britton et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
6072245 | Ockels | Jun 2000 | A |
6422508 | Barnes | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6450445 | Moller | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6502787 | Barrett | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6523781 | Ragner | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6575402 | Scott | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6588701 | Yavnai | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6604706 | Bostan | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6616402 | Selsam | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6622090 | Lin | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6665594 | Armstrong | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6691949 | Plump et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6694228 | Rios | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6712312 | Kucik | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6721646 | Carroll | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6781254 | Roberts | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6813559 | Bodin et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6847865 | Carroll | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6873886 | Mullen et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6979171 | Lauritsen | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7000883 | Mercadal et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7032861 | Sanders, Jr. et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7044422 | Bostan | May 2006 | B2 |
7129596 | Macedo | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7158877 | Carlsson et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7183663 | Roberts et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7228227 | Speer | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7231294 | Bodin et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7249732 | Sanders, Jr. et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7289906 | Van Der Merwe et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7299130 | Mulligan et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7302316 | Beard et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7317261 | Rolt | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7335000 | Ferguson | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7352075 | Willey et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7602077 | Ferguson | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7775761 | Ferguson | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7859126 | Ferguson | Dec 2010 | B2 |
20040094662 | Sanders, Jr. et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040129828 | Bostan | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20050082421 | Perlo et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050165517 | Reich | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20060049304 | Sanders, Jr. et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060102780 | Parks | May 2006 | A1 |
20060106506 | Nichols et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060192047 | Goossen | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060231675 | Bostan | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060287824 | Lin | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070018052 | Eriksson | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070034738 | Sanders, Jr. et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070051848 | Mantych et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070069083 | Shams et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070129855 | Coulmeau | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070189899 | Serpa | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070193650 | Eannati | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070200027 | Johnson | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070221790 | Goossen | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070228214 | Horak | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070244608 | Rath et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070262195 | Bulaga et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070271032 | Cheng et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070295298 | Mark | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080023587 | Head et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080035786 | Bilyk et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080059068 | Strelow et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080071431 | Dockter et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080078865 | Burne | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080112807 | Uphues et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1868008 | Dec 2007 | EP |
1767453 | Jun 2008 | EP |
0015497 | Mar 2000 | WO |
2004002821 | Jan 2004 | WO |
2007058643 | May 2007 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100013226 A1 | Jan 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61082031 | Jul 2008 | US |