Text-to-speech (TTS) systems convert written text to sound. This can be useful to assist users of digital text media by synthesizing speech representing text displayed on a computer screen. Speech recognition systems have also progressed to the point where humans can interact with and control computing devices by voice. TTS and speech recognition combined with natural language understanding processing techniques enable speech-based user control and output of a computing device to perform tasks based on the user's spoken commands. The combination of speech recognition and natural language understanding processing is referred to herein as speech processing. Such TTS and speech processing may be used by computers, hand-held devices, telephone computer systems, kiosks, and a wide variety of other devices to improve human-computer interactions.
For a more complete understanding of the present disclosure, reference is now made to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
Text-to-speech (TTS) systems typically work using one of two techniques. A first technique, called unit selection or concatenative TTS, processes and divides pre-recorded speech into many different segments of audio data, called units. The pre-recorded speech may be obtained by recording a human speaking many lines of text. Each segment that the speech is divided into may correspond to a particular audio unit such as a phoneme, diphone, or other length of sound. The individual units and data describing the units may be stored in a unit database, also called a voice corpus or voice inventory. When text data is received for TTS processing, the system may select the units that correspond to how the text should sound and may combine them to generate, i.e., synthesize, the audio data that represents the desired speech.
A second technique, called parametric synthesis or statistical parametric speech synthesis (SPSS), may use computer models and other data processing techniques to generate sound that is not based on pre-recorded speech (e.g., speech recorded prior to receipt of an incoming TTS request) but rather uses computing parameters to create output audio data. Vocoders are examples of components that can produce speech using parametric synthesis. Parametric synthesis may provide a large range of diverse sounds that may be computer-generated at runtime for a TTS request.
Instead of or in addition to unit selection and/or parametric synthesis, one or more machine-learning speech model(s) may be trained to directly generate audio data, for example audio output waveforms; the speech model may thus be referred to as a trained model. The speech model may generate the audio data sample-by-sample. The speech model may create tens of thousands of samples per second of audio; in some embodiments, the rate of output audio samples is 16 kHz. The speech model may be fully probabilistic and/or autoregressive; the predictive distribution of each audio sample may be conditioned on all previous audio samples. As explained in further detail below, the speech model may include a sample model, a conditioning model, and/or an output model—which may also be referred to as a sample network, conditioning network, and/or output network, respectively—and may use causal convolutions to predict output audio; in some embodiments, the speech model uses dilated convolutions to generate an output sample using a greater area of input samples than would otherwise be possible. The speech model may be trained using a conditioning model that conditions hidden layers of the model using linguistic context features, such as phoneme data. The audio output generated by the model may have higher audio quality than either unit selection or parametric synthesis.
The speech model may be trained to generate audio data corresponding to an audio output that resembles a vocal attribute—such as style, accent, tone, language, or other attribute—of a particular speaker using training data from one or more human speakers. A particular use or application of the speech model may later, however, require or prefer audio output that resembles that of a different speaker, different style, or different language. While the entire speech model may be re-trained to this new requirement, doing so may consume an unacceptable amount of time and/or computing resources. Further, re-training the speech model may not be possible if the speech model is disposed on a deployed system and not accessible for re-training. Embodiments of the present disclosure thus include systems and methods of identifying and/or including a portion of the speech model associated with attributes of the trained speaker and re-training only this portion. The re-training of the portion consumes less time and computing resources than re-training the entire speech model. In addition, multiple re-trained portions of the speech model may be included in the speech model during run-time and may be switched on or off depending on the requirements of the run-time speech model.
An exemplary system overview is described in reference to
Components of a system that may be used to perform unit selection, parametric TTS processing, and/or model-based audio synthesis are shown in
As shown in
The TTS front end 216 transforms input text data 210 (for example from some speechlet component or other text source) into a symbolic linguistic representation, which may include linguistic context features, fundamental frequency information, or other such information, for processing by the speech synthesis engine 218. The input text data 210 may be, for example, ASCII text, compressed text, or any other similar representation of text, and may be received from a user (from, e.g., a text-based query or command) or may be generated from audio data (from, e.g., an audio-based query or command). The TTS front end 216 may also process tags or other input data 215 input to the TTS component 295 that indicate how specific words should be pronounced; the other input data 215 may, for example, indicate the desired output speech quality using tags formatted according to the speech synthesis markup language (SSML) or in some other form. For example, a first tag may be included with text marking the beginning of when text should be whispered (e.g., <begin whisper>) and a second tag may be included with text marking the end of when text should be whispered (e.g., <end whisper>). The tags may be included in the input text data and/or the text for a TTS request may be accompanied by separate metadata indicating what text should be whispered (or have some other indicated audio characteristic). The speech synthesis engine 218 compares the annotated phonetic units models and information stored in the TTS unit storage 272 and/or TTS parametric storage 280 for converting the input text into speech. The TTS front end 216 and speech synthesis engine 218 may include their own controller(s)/processor(s) and memory or they may use the controller/processor and memory of the server 120, device 110, or other device, for example. Similarly, the instructions for operating the TTS front end 216 and speech synthesis engine 218 may be located within the TTS component 295, within the memory and/or storage of the server 120, device 110, or within an external device.
Text data 210 input into a TTS component 295 may be sent to the TTS front end 216 for processing. The front-end may include components for performing text normalization, linguistic analysis, linguistic prosody generation, or other such components. During text normalization, the TTS front end 216 may process the text input and generate standard text, converting such things as numbers, abbreviations (such as Apt., St., etc.), symbols ($, %, etc.) into the equivalent of written out words.
During linguistic analysis the TTS front end 216 analyzes the language in the normalized text to generate a sequence of phonetic units corresponding to the input text. This process may be referred to as grapheme-to-phoneme conversion. Phonetic units include symbolic representations of sound units to be eventually combined and output by the system as speech. Various sound units may be used for dividing text for purposes of speech synthesis. The TTS component 295 may process speech based on phonemes (individual sounds), half-phonemes, di-phones (the last half of one phoneme coupled with the first half of the adjacent phoneme), bi-phones (two consecutive phonemes), syllables, words, phrases, sentences, or other units. Each word may be mapped to one or more phonetic units. Such mapping may be performed using a language dictionary stored by the system, for example in the TTS storage component 272. The linguistic analysis performed by the TTS front end 216 may also identify different grammatical components such as prefixes, suffixes, phrases, punctuation, syntactic boundaries, or the like. Such grammatical components may be used by the TTS component 295 to craft a natural sounding audio waveform output. The language dictionary may also include letter-to-sound rules and other tools that may be used to pronounce previously unidentified words or letter combinations that may be encountered by the TTS component 295. Generally, the more information included in the language dictionary, the higher quality the speech output.
Based on the linguistic analysis the TTS front end 216 may then perform linguistic prosody generation where the phonetic units are annotated with desired prosodic characteristics, also called acoustic features, which indicate how the desired phonetic units are to be pronounced in the eventual output speech. During this stage the TTS front end 216 may consider and incorporate any prosodic annotations (for example as input text metadata 215) that accompanied the text input to the TTS component 295. Such acoustic features may include pitch, energy, duration, and the like. Application of acoustic features may be based on prosodic models available to the TTS component 295. Such prosodic models indicate how specific phonetic units are to be pronounced in certain circumstances. A prosodic model may consider, for example, a phoneme's position in a syllable, a syllable's position in a word, a word's position in a sentence or phrase, neighboring phonetic units, etc. As with the language dictionary, prosodic model with more information may result in higher quality speech output than prosodic models with less information. Further, a prosodic model and/or phonetic units may be used to indicate particular speech qualities of the speech to be synthesized, where those speech qualities may match the speech qualities of input speech (for example, the phonetic units may indicate prosodic characteristics to make the ultimately synthesized speech sound like a whisper based on the input speech being whispered).
The output of the TTS front end 216, which may be referred to as a symbolic linguistic representation, may include a sequence of phonetic units annotated with prosodic characteristics. This symbolic linguistic representation may be sent to the speech synthesis engine 218, which may also be known as a synthesizer, for conversion into an audio waveform of speech for output to an audio output device and eventually to a user. The speech synthesis engine 218 may be configured to convert the input text into high-quality natural-sounding speech in an efficient manner. Such high-quality speech may be configured to sound as much like a human speaker as possible, or may be configured to be understandable to a listener without attempts to mimic a precise human voice.
The speech synthesis engine 218 may perform speech synthesis using one or more different methods. In one method of synthesis called unit selection, described further below, a unit selection engine 230 matches the symbolic linguistic representation created by the TTS front end 216 against a database of recorded speech, such as a database (e.g., TTS unit storage 272) storing information regarding one or more voice corpuses (e.g., voice inventories 278a-n). Each voice inventory may correspond to various segments of audio that was recorded by a speaking human, such as a voice actor, where the segments are stored in an individual inventory 278 as acoustic units (e.g., phonemes, diphones, etc.). Each stored unit of audio may also be associated with an index listing various acoustic properties or other descriptive information about the unit. Each unit includes an audio waveform corresponding with a phonetic unit, such as a short .wav file of the specific sound, along with a description of various features associated with the audio waveform. For example, an index entry for a particular unit may include information such as a particular unit's pitch, energy, duration, harmonics, center frequency, where the phonetic unit appears in a word, sentence, or phrase, the neighboring phonetic units, or the like. The unit selection engine 230 may then use the information about each unit to select units to be joined together to form the speech output.
The unit selection engine 230 matches the symbolic linguistic representation against information about the spoken audio units in the database. The unit database may include multiple examples of phonetic units to provide the system with many different options for concatenating units into speech. Matching units which are determined to have the desired acoustic qualities to create the desired output audio are selected and concatenated together (for example by a synthesis component 220) to form output audio data 290 representing synthesized speech. The output audio data 290 may be formatted as MP3, OGG, WAV, or other audio data formats, and may have a data rate of 16 kHz. The TTS module 295 may further output other output data 285, which may include audio data such as tones or beeps, similarly formatted as MP3, OGG, WAV, or other audio data formats, text data, or any other data format. Using all the information in the unit database, a unit selection engine 230 may match units to the input text to select units that can form a natural sounding waveform. One benefit of unit selection is that, depending on the size of the database, a natural sounding speech output may be generated. As described above, the larger the unit database of the voice corpus, the more likely the system will be able to construct natural sounding speech.
In another method of synthesis called parametric synthesis parameters such as frequency, volume, noise, are varied by a parametric synthesis engine 232, digital signal processor or other audio generation device to create an artificial speech waveform output. Parametric synthesis uses a computerized voice generator, sometimes called a vocoder. Parametric synthesis may use an acoustic model and various statistical techniques to match a symbolic linguistic representation with desired output speech parameters. Using parametric synthesis, a computing system (for example, a synthesis component 220) can generate audio waveforms having the desired acoustic properties. Parametric synthesis may include the ability to be accurate at high processing speeds, as well as the ability to process speech without large databases associated with unit selection, but also may produce an output speech quality that may not match that of unit selection. Unit selection and parametric techniques may be performed individually or combined together and/or combined with other synthesis techniques to produce speech audio output.
The TTS component 295 may be configured to perform TTS processing in multiple languages. For each language, the TTS component 295 may include specially configured data, instructions and/or components to synthesize speech in the desired language(s). To improve performance, the TTS component 295 may revise/update the contents of the TTS storage 280 based on feedback of the results of TTS processing, thus enabling the TTS component 295 to improve speech recognition.
The TTS storage module 295 may be customized for an individual user based on his/her individualized desired speech output. In particular, the speech unit stored in a unit database may be taken from input audio data of the user speaking. For example, to create the customized speech output of the system, the system may be configured with multiple voice inventories 278a-278n, where each unit database is configured with a different “voice” to match desired speech qualities. Such voice inventories may also be linked to user accounts. The voice selected by the TTS component 295 to synthesize the speech. For example, one voice corpus may be stored to be used to synthesize whispered speech (or speech approximating whispered speech), another may be stored to be used to synthesize excited speech (or speech approximating excited speech), and so on. To create the different voice corpuses a multitude of TTS training utterances may be spoken by an individual (such as a voice actor) and recorded by the system. The audio associated with the TTS training utterances may then be split into small audio segments and stored as part of a voice corpus. The individual speaking the TTS training utterances may speak in different voice qualities to create the customized voice corpuses, for example the individual may whisper the training utterances, say them in an excited voice, and so on. Thus the audio of each customized voice corpus may match the respective desired speech quality. The customized voice inventory 278 may then be used during runtime to perform unit selection to synthesize speech having a speech quality corresponding to the input speech quality.
Additionally, parametric synthesis may be used to synthesize speech with the desired speech quality. For parametric synthesis, parametric features may be configured that match the desired speech quality. If simulated excited speech was desired, parametric features may indicate an increased speech rate and/or pitch for the resulting speech. Many other examples are possible. The desired parametric features for particular speech qualities may be stored in a “voice” profile (e.g., parametric settings 268) and used for speech synthesis when the specific speech quality is desired. Customized voices may be created based on multiple desired speech qualities combined (for either unit selection or parametric synthesis). For example, one voice may be “shouted” while another voice may be “shouted and emphasized.” Many such combinations are possible.
Unit selection speech synthesis may be performed as follows. Unit selection includes a two-step process. First a unit selection engine 230 determines what speech units to use and then it combines them so that the particular combined units match the desired phonemes and acoustic features and create the desired speech output. Units may be selected based on a cost function which represents how well particular units fit the speech segments to be synthesized. The cost function may represent a combination of different costs representing different aspects of how well a particular speech unit may work for a particular speech segment. For example, a target cost indicates how well an individual given speech unit matches the features of a desired speech output (e.g., pitch, prosody, etc.). A join cost represents how well a particular speech unit matches an adjacent speech unit (e.g., a speech unit appearing directly before or directly after the particular speech unit) for purposes of concatenating the speech units together in the eventual synthesized speech. The overall cost function is a combination of target cost, join cost, and other costs that may be determined by the unit selection engine 230. As part of unit selection, the unit selection engine 230 chooses the speech unit with the lowest overall combined cost. For example, a speech unit with a very low target cost may not necessarily be selected if its join cost is high.
The system may be configured with one or more voice corpuses for unit selection. Each voice corpus may include a speech unit database. The speech unit database may be stored in TTS unit storage 272 or in another storage component. For example, different unit selection databases may be stored in TTS unit storage 272. Each speech unit database (e.g., voice inventory) includes recorded speech utterances with the utterances' corresponding text aligned to the utterances. A speech unit database may include many hours of recorded speech (in the form of audio waveforms, feature vectors, or other formats), which may occupy a significant amount of storage. The unit samples in the speech unit database may be classified in a variety of ways including by phonetic unit (phoneme, diphone, word, etc.), linguistic prosodic label, acoustic feature sequence, speaker identity, etc. The sample utterances may be used to create mathematical models corresponding to desired audio output for particular speech units. When matching a symbolic linguistic representation the speech synthesis engine 218 may attempt to select a unit in the speech unit database that most closely matches the input text (including both phonetic units and prosodic annotations). Generally the larger the voice corpus/speech unit database the better the speech synthesis may be achieved by virtue of the greater number of unit samples that may be selected to form the precise desired speech output. An example of how unit selection is performed is illustrated in
For example, as shown in
The individual potential units are selected based on the information available in the voice inventory about the acoustic properties of the potential units and how closely each potential unit matches the desired sound for the target unit sequence 302. How closely each respective unit matches the desired sound will be represented by a target cost. Thus, for example, unit #-H1 will have a first target cost, unit #-H2 will have a second target cost, unit #-H3 will have a third target cost, and so on.
The TTS system then creates a graph of potential sequences of candidate units to synthesize the available speech. The size of this graph may be variable based on certain device settings. An example of this graph is shown in
Vocoder-based parametric speech synthesis may be performed as follows. A TTS component 295 may include an acoustic model, or other models, which may convert a symbolic linguistic representation into a synthetic acoustic waveform of the text input based on audio signal manipulation. The acoustic model includes rules which may be used by the parametric synthesis engine 232 to assign specific audio waveform parameters to input phonetic units and/or prosodic annotations. The rules may be used to calculate a score representing a likelihood that a particular audio output parameter(s) (such as frequency, volume, etc.) corresponds to the portion of the input symbolic linguistic representation from the TTS front end 216.
The parametric synthesis engine 232 may use a number of techniques to match speech to be synthesized with input phonetic units and/or prosodic annotations. One common technique is using Hidden Markov Models (HMMs). HMMs may be used to determine probabilities that audio output should match textual input. HMMs may be used to translate from parameters from the linguistic and acoustic space to the parameters to be used by a vocoder (the digital voice encoder) to artificially synthesize the desired speech. Using HMMs, a number of states are presented, in which the states together represent one or more potential acoustic parameters to be output to the vocoder and each state is associated with a model, such as a Gaussian mixture model. Transitions between states may also have an associated probability, representing a likelihood that a current state may be reached from a previous state. Sounds to be output may be represented as paths between states of the HMM and multiple paths may represent multiple possible audio matches for the same input text. Each portion of text may be represented by multiple potential states corresponding to different known pronunciations of phonemes and their parts (such as the phoneme identity, stress, accent, position, etc.). An initial determination of a probability of a potential phoneme may be associated with one state. As new text is processed by the speech synthesis engine 218, the state may change or stay the same, based on the processing of the new text. For example, the pronunciation of a previously processed word might change based on later processed words. A Viterbi algorithm may be used to find the most likely sequence of states based on the processed text. The HMMs may generate speech in parameterized form including parameters such as fundamental frequency (f0), noise envelope, spectral envelope, etc. that are translated by a vocoder into audio segments. The output parameters may be configured for particular vocoders such as a STRAIGHT vocoder, TANDEM-STRAIGHT vocoder, WORLD vocoder, HNM (harmonic plus noise) based vocoders, CELP (code-excited linear prediction) vocoders, GlottHMM vocoders, HSM (harmonic/stochastic model) vocoders, or others.
An example of HMM processing for speech synthesis is shown in
The probabilities and states may be calculated using a number of techniques. For example, probabilities for each state may be calculated using a Gaussian model, Gaussian mixture model, or other technique based on the feature vectors and the contents of the TTS storage 280. Techniques such as maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) may be used to estimate the probability of particular states.
In addition to calculating potential states for one audio waveform as a potential match to a phonetic unit, the parametric synthesis engine 232 may also calculate potential states for other potential audio outputs (such as various ways of pronouncing a particular phoneme or diphone) as potential acoustic matches for the acoustic unit. In this manner multiple states and state transition probabilities may be calculated.
The probable states and probable state transitions calculated by the parametric synthesis engine 232 may lead to a number of potential audio output sequences. Based on the acoustic model and other potential models, the potential audio output sequences may be scored according to a confidence level of the parametric synthesis engine 232. The highest scoring audio output sequence, including a stream of parameters to be synthesized, may be chosen and digital signal processing may be performed by a vocoder or similar component to create an audio output including synthesized speech waveforms corresponding to the parameters of the highest scoring audio output sequence and, if the proper sequence was selected, also corresponding to the input text. The different parametric settings 268, which may represent acoustic settings matching a particular parametric “voice”, may be used by the synthesis component 220 to ultimately create the output audio data 290.
The sample model 502 may include a dilated convolution component 512. The dilated convolution component 512 performs a filter over an area of the input larger than the length of the filter by skipping input values with a certain step size, depending on the layer of the convolution. For example, the dilated convolution component 512 may operate on every sample in the first layer, every second sample in the second layer, every fourth sample in the third layer, and so on. The dilated convolution component 512 may effectively allow the speech model 222 to operate on a coarser scale than with a normal convolution. The input to the dilated convolution component 512 may be, for example, a vector of size r created by performing a 2×1 convolution and a tan h function (also known as a hyperbolic tangent function) on an input audio one-hot vector. The output of the dilated convolution component 512 may be a vector of size 2r.
An activation/combination component 514 may combine the output of the dilated convolution component 512 with one or more outputs of the conditioning model 506, as described in greater detail below, and/or operated on by one or more activation functions, such as tan h or sigmoid functions, as also described in greater detail below. The activation/combination component 514 may combine the 2r vector output by the dilated convolution component 512 into a vector of size r. The present disclosure is not, however, limited to any particular architecture related to activation and/or combination.
The output of the activation/combination component 514 may be combined, using a combination component 516, with the input to the dilated convolution component 512. In some embodiments, prior to this combination, the output of the activation/combination component 514 is convolved by a second convolution component 518, which may be a 1×1 convolution on r values.
The sample model 502 may include one or more layers, each of which may include some or all of the components described above. In some embodiments, the sample model 502 includes 40 layers, which may be configured in four blocks with ten layers per block; the output of each combination component 516, which may be referred to as residual channels, may include 128 values; and the output of each component 520, which may be referred to as skip channels or skip outputs, may include 1024 values. The dilation performed by the dilated convolution component 512 may be 2n for each layer n, and may be reset at each block.
The first layer may receive the metadata 508 as input; the output of the first layer, corresponding to the output of the combination component 514, may be received by the dilated convolution component 512 of the second layer. The output of the last layer may be unused. As one of skill in the art will understand, a greater number of layers may result in higher-quality output speech at the cost of greater computational complexity and/or cost; any number of layers is, however, within the scope of the present disclosure. In some embodiments, the number of layers may be limited in the latency between the first layer and the last layer, as determined by the characteristics of a particular computing system, and the output audio rate (e.g., 16 kHz).
The component 520 may receive the output (of size r) of the activation/combination component 514 and perform a convolution (which may be a 1×1 convolution) or an affine transformation to produce an output of size s, wherein s<r. In some embodiments, this operation may also be referred to as a skip operation or a skip-connection operation, in which only a subset of the outputs from the layers of the sample model 502 are used as input by the component 520. The output of the component 520 may be combined using a second combination component 522, the output of which may be received by an output model 524 to create output audio data 290, which is also explained in greater detail below. An output of the output model 524 may be fed back to the TTS front end 216.
Referring to
Referring to
With reference to
As mentioned above, the speech model 222 may be used with existing TTS front ends, such as those developed for use with the unit selection and parametric speech systems described above. In other embodiments, however, the TTS front end may include one or more additional models that may be trained using training data, similar to how the speech model 222 may be trained.
A grapheme-to-phoneme model 906 may be trained to convert the training text 904 from text (e.g., text characters) to phonemes, which may be encoded using a phonemic alphabet such as ARPABET. The grapheme-to-phoneme model 906 may reference a phoneme dictionary 908. A segmentation model 910 may be trained to locate phoneme boundaries in the voice dataset using an output of the grapheme-to-phoneme model 906 and the training audio 902. Given this input, the segmentation model 910 may be trained to identify where in the training audio 902 each phoneme begins and ends. An acoustic feature prediction model 912 may be trained to predict acoustic features of the training audio, such as whether a phoneme is voiced, the fundamental frequency (F0) throughout the phoneme's duration, or other such features. A phoneme duration prediction model 916 may be trained to predict the temporal duration of phonemes in a phoneme sequence (e.g., an utterance). The speech model receives, as inputs, the outputs of the grapheme-to-phoneme model 906, the duration prediction model 916, and the acoustic features prediction model 912 and may be trained to synthesize audio at a high sampling rate, as described above.
In various embodiments of the present disclosure, a sub-model of the speech model 222 may be-retrained to implement a vocal attribute—such as style accent, tone, language, and/or other attribute—that differs from that of the original speech model 222. As mentioned above, training the sub-model may consume fewer computing resources than would be required to train the entire speech model 222; in some embodiments, re-training of the entire speech model 222 may be impractical even with large amounts of computing resources. As mentioned above, re-training the entire speech model may involve applying training data, evaluating an output of the speech model against the training data, and varying values associated with all nodes of the speech model in accordance with a training function. The varied values associated with the nodes thus cause the output of the speech model to more closely resemble the training data. In accordance with the present disclosure, however, the re-training may include holding values associated with nodes outside the sub-model, such as offset values, weight values, and/or similar values, constant, while permitting values associated with nodes inside the sub-model to change or vary based on new training data associated with the new voice. For example, when the speech model is being updated based on a training function, a first offset value associated with a first node outside the sub-model is not varied, changed, or otherwise updated—i.e., it is held constant. In contrast, a second offset value associated with a second node inside the sub-model may be varied, changed, or otherwise updated in accordance with the training function. In other words, when the speech model is updated during training, only nodes in the sub-model change in accordance with the training data—the nodes outside the sub-model do not change.
When training or re-training the entire speech model 222, any or all of a number of network elements may be trained or re-trained. These network elements may include, with reference to
In some embodiments, the sub-model includes the affine transform component 810 of
In other embodiments of the present disclosure, the sub-model includes additional components in the speech model 222. For example, with reference to
In various embodiments, selection of which of the above-described sub-models to select for re-training depends at least in part on how much the voice style to be trained differs from the original voice style. For example, if the difference is small, such as the case in which the original voice style is neutral and the new voice style is lightly accented, the affine transform component 810 or the single speaker activation component 1104 of
Instead of or in addition to the re-training of one or more of the various sub-models described above, with reference also to
Audio waveforms (such as output audio data 290) including the speech output from the TTS component 295 may be sent to an audio output component, such as a speaker for playback to a user or may be sent for transmission to another device, such as another server 120, for further processing or output to a user. Audio waveforms including the speech may be sent in a number of different formats such as a series of feature vectors, uncompressed audio data, or compressed audio data. For example, audio speech output may be encoded and/or compressed by an encoder/decoder (not shown) prior to transmission. The encoder/decoder may be customized for encoding and decoding speech data, such as digitized audio data, feature vectors, etc. The encoder/decoder may also encode non-TTS data of the system, for example using a general encoding scheme such as .zip, etc.
Although the above discusses a system, one or more components of the system may reside on any number of devices.
Each server 120 may include one or more controllers/processors (1202), which may each include a central processing unit (CPU) for processing data and computer-readable instructions, and a memory (1204) for storing data and instructions of the respective device. The memories (1204) may individually include volatile random access memory (RAM), non-volatile read only memory (ROM), non-volatile magnetoresistive (MRAM) and/or other types of memory. Each server may also include a data storage component (1206), for storing data and controller/processor-executable instructions. Each data storage component may individually include one or more non-volatile storage types such as magnetic storage, optical storage, solid-state storage, etc. Each device may also be connected to removable or external non-volatile memory and/or storage (such as a removable memory card, memory key drive, networked storage, etc.) through respective input/output device interfaces (1208). The storage component 1206 may include storage for various data including ASR models, NLU knowledge base, entity library, speech quality models, TTS voice unit storage, and other storage used to operate the system.
Computer instructions for operating each server (120) and its various components may be executed by the respective server's controller(s)/processor(s) (1202), using the memory (1204) as temporary “working” storage at runtime. A server's computer instructions may be stored in a non-transitory manner in non-volatile memory (1204), storage (1206), or an external device(s). Alternatively, some or all of the executable instructions may be embedded in hardware or firmware on the respective device in addition to or instead of software.
The server (120) may include input/output device interfaces (1208). A variety of components may be connected through the input/output device interfaces, as will be discussed further below. Additionally, the server (120) may include an address/data bus (1210) for conveying data among components of the respective device. Each component within a server (120) may also be directly connected to other components in addition to (or instead of) being connected to other components across the bus (1210).
One or more servers 120 may include the TTS component 295, or other components capable of performing the functions described above.
As described above, the storage component 1206 may include storage for various data including speech quality models, TTS voice unit storage, and other storage used to operate the system and perform the algorithms and methods described above. The storage component 1206 may also store information corresponding to a user profile, including purchases of the user, returns of the user, recent content accessed, etc.
As noted above, multiple devices may be employed in a single system. In such a multi-device system, each of the devices may include different components for performing different aspects of the system. The multiple devices may include overlapping components. The components of the devices 110 and server(s) 120, as described with reference to
As illustrated in
As described above, a device, may be associated with a user profile. For example, the device may be associated with a user identification (ID) number or other profile information linking the device to a user account. The user account/ID/profile may be used by the system to perform speech controlled commands (for example commands discussed above). The user account/ID/profile may be associated with particular model(s) or other information used to identify received audio, classify received audio (for example as a specific sound described above), determine user intent, determine user purchase history, content accessed by or relevant to the user, etc.
The concepts disclosed herein may be applied within a number of different devices and computer systems, including, for example, general-purpose computing systems, speech processing systems, and distributed computing environments.
The above aspects of the present disclosure are meant to be illustrative. They were chosen to explain the principles and application of the disclosure and are not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the disclosure. Many modifications and variations of the disclosed aspects may be apparent to those of skill in the art. Persons having ordinary skill in the field of computers and speech processing should recognize that components and process steps described herein may be interchangeable with other components or steps, or combinations of components or steps, and still achieve the benefits and advantages of the present disclosure. Moreover, it should be apparent to one skilled in the art, that the disclosure may be practiced without some or all of the specific details and steps disclosed herein.
Aspects of the disclosed system may be implemented as a computer method or as an article of manufacture such as a memory device or non-transitory computer readable storage medium. The computer readable storage medium may be readable by a computer and may comprise instructions for causing a computer or other device to perform processes described in the present disclosure. The computer readable storage media may be implemented by a volatile computer memory, non-volatile computer memory, hard drive, solid-state memory, flash drive, removable disk and/or other media. In addition, components of one or more of the components, components and engines may be implemented as in firmware or hardware, including digital filters (e.g., filters configured as firmware to a digital signal processor (DSP)).
The concepts disclosed herein may be applied within a number of different devices and computer systems, including, for example, general-purpose computing systems, speech processing systems, and distributed computing environments.
The above aspects of the present disclosure are meant to be illustrative. They were chosen to explain the principles and application of the disclosure and are not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the disclosure. Many modifications and variations of the disclosed aspects may be apparent to those of skill in the art. Persons having ordinary skill in the field of computers and speech processing should recognize that components and process steps described herein may be interchangeable with other components or steps, or combinations of components or steps, and still achieve the benefits and advantages of the present disclosure. Moreover, it should be apparent to one skilled in the art, that the disclosure may be practiced without some or all of the specific details and steps disclosed herein.
Aspects of the disclosed system may be implemented as a computer method or as an article of manufacture such as a memory device or non-transitory computer readable storage medium. The computer readable storage medium may be readable by a computer and may comprise instructions for causing a computer or other device to perform processes described in the present disclosure. The computer readable storage media may be implemented by a volatile computer memory, non-volatile computer memory, hard drive, solid-state memory, flash drive, removable disk and/or other media. In addition, components of one or more of the components and engines may be implemented as in firmware or hardware, such as the acoustic front end 256, which comprise among other things, analog and/or digital filters (e.g., filters configured as firmware to a digital signal processor (DSP)).
As used in this disclosure, the term “a” or “one” may include one or more items unless specifically stated otherwise. Further, the phrase “based on” is intended to mean “based at least in part on” unless specifically stated otherwise.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20130289998 | Eller | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20160093289 | Pollet | Mar 2016 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Hunt, et al., “Unit Selection in a Concatenative Speech Synthesis System Using a Large Speech Database,” in ICASSP, 1996, pp. 373-376. |
Taylor et al., “The Architecture of the Festival Speech Synthesis System,” in the Third ESCA/COCOSDA workshop on Speech Synthesis, 1998. |
Taylor et al., “The Target Cost Formulation in Unit Selection Speech Synthesis,” in Interspeech, 2006. |
Zen et al., “Statistical Parametric Speech Synthesis,” Speech Communication, vol. 51, No. 11, pp. 1039-1064, 2009. |
S. King, “An Introduction to Statistical Parametric Speech Synthesis,” Sadhana, vol. 36, pp. 837-852, 2011. |
Zen et al., “Statistical Parametric Speech Synthesis Using Deep Neural Networks,” in ICASSP, 2013. |
H. Zen, “Acoustic Modeling in Statistical Parametric Speech Synthesis-from HMM to LSTM-RNN,” Proc. MLSLP, 2015. |
Ling et al., “The USTC System for Blizzard Challenge 2008,” in Blizzard Challenge, 2008. |
Qian et al., “A Unified Trajectory Tiling Approach to High Quality Speech Rendering,” IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 280-290, 2013. |
Merritt et al., “Deep Neural Network-Guided Unit Selection Synthesis,” in ICASSP, 2016. |
H. Kawahara, “Straight, Exploitation of the Other Aspect of Vocoder: Perceptually Isomorphic Decomposition of Speech Sounds,” Acoustical Science and Technology, vol. 27, No. 6 pp. 349-353, 2006. |
Moirse et al., “World: A Vocoder-Based High-Quality Speech Synthesis System for Real-Time Applications,” IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems, 2016. |
Merritt et al., “Investigating Source and Filter Contributions, and Their Interactions, to Statistical Parametric Speech Synthesis,” in Interspeech, 2014. |
Merrit et al., “Attributing Modeling Errors in HMM Synthesis by Stepping Gradually from Natural to Modeled Speech,” in ICASSP, 2015. |
Yan, et al., “Rich-Context Unit Selection (RUS) Approach to High Quality TTS,” in ICASSP, 2010. |
Oord et al., “Wavenet: A Generative Model For Raw Audio,” in arXiv preprint arXiv: 1609.03499. 2016. |
Arik et al., “Deep Voice: Real-Time Neural Text-To-Speech,” in arXiv: 1702. |
Arik et al., “Deep Voice 2: Multi-Speaker Neural Text-To-Speech,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2017, pp. 2966-2974. |
Ping et al., “Deep Voice 3: 2000—Speaker Neural Text-To-Speech,” in arXiv: 1710.07654, 2017. |
Mehri et al., “SampleRNN: An Unconditional End-To-End Neural Audio Generation Model,” in ICLR, 2017. |
Sotelo et al., “Char2wav: End-To-End Speech Synthesis,” in ICLR, 2017. |
Oord et al., “Parallel Wavenet: Fast High-Fidelity Speech Synthesis,” in arXiv: 1711.10433v1, 2017. |
Klimkov et al., “Phrase Break Prediction for Long-Form Reading TTS: Exploiting Text Structure Information,” in Interspeech, 2017. |
“Method for the Subjective Assesment of Intermediate Quality Level of Coding Systems,” International Telecommunication Union Radiocommunication Assembly, 2003, ITU Recommendations ITU-R BS. 1534-1. |
Henter et al., “Measuring the Perceptual Effects of Modeling Assumptions in Speech Synthesis Using Stimuli Constructed From Repeated Natural Speech,” in Interspeech, 2014. |
Watts et al., “From Hmms to dnns: Where do the Improvements come from?” in ICASSP, 2016. |
Wester et al., “Are we Using Enough Listeners? No! An Empiricaly-Supported Critique of Interspeech 2014 TTS Evaluations,” in Interspeech, 2015. |
The Examiner's attentiion is hereby drawn to the specification and file history of co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 16/023,370, entitled “Text-To-Speech (TTS) Processing”, filed Jun. 29, 2018, which may contain information relevant to the present application. |
The Examiner's attention is hereby drawn to the specification and file history of co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 16/007,757, entitled “Text-To-Speech (TTS) Processing”, filed Jun. 13, 2018, which may contain information relevant to the present application. |