Textile-based prothesis for laparoscopic surgery

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 12059338
  • Patent Number
    12,059,338
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, April 14, 2022
    2 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, August 13, 2024
    5 months ago
Abstract
The invention relates to a prosthesis (1) comprising a textile (2) of elongate shape defining a longitudinal axis A, and a reinforcing element comprising at least one semi-rigid elongate structure (8) connected to said textile, said structure being substantially parallel to said longitudinal axis A and having a distal end provided with at least one fastening element (4) distinct from said textile and capable of cooperating with a part of a tool (10) that is able to pass through said trocar, in order to temporarily couple said prosthesis to said tool.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention relates to a prosthesis based on a biocompatible textile and more particularly intended to be implanted by laparoscopy, such as, for example, the wall reinforcement prostheses for repair of hernias.


BACKGROUND

Wall reinforcement prostheses, for example for the abdominal wall, are widely used in surgery. These prostheses are intended to treat hernias by temporarily or permanently filling a tissue defect. These prostheses are generally made from a biocompatible prosthetic textile and can have a number of shapes, for example rectangular, circular or oval, depending on the anatomical structure to which they are to adapt. Some of these prostheses are made from entirely bioresorbable filaments and are intended to disappear after they have performed their reinforcing function during the period of cellular colonization and tissue rehabilitation. Others comprise non-bioresorbable filaments and are intended to remain permanently in the body of the patient.


Moreover, in order to minimize the trauma subsequent to any surgical intervention, patients are increasingly operated on by laparoscopy when the type of intervention performed allows this. Laparoscopy requires only very small incisions through which a trocar is passed, with the prosthesis being conveyed inside the trocar to the implantation site. Open surgery is thus avoided, and the patient can soon leave hospital. Laparoscopy is particularly popular in surgical interventions performed in the abdomen, for example the treatment of hernias.


However, the trocars used in laparoscopic surgery generally have a relatively small calibrated diameter, which may vary, for example, from 5 to 15 mm, in order to reduce as much as possible the size of the incision that is made. The prosthesis therefore has to be conveyed within a conduit of small diameter and must then be deployed at the implantation site.


To carry out this step, the prosthesis is generally rolled up on itself in order to make it slide in the conduit of the trocar or is introduced directly by force, if appropriate with the aid of laparoscopy forceps. However, the small diameter of the trocar used makes this step particularly difficult to carry out. If the rolling-up of the prosthesis is not correctly guided and effected, the textile may form a plug in the trocar. The prosthesis no longer slides inside the trocar, and it is very complicated to remove it from the latter. Moreover, even when the prosthesis has been correctly rolled up, the emergence of the prosthesis from the trocar and the deployment of the prosthesis at the implantation site are complex steps. Indeed, the surgeon initially has to pull on the prosthesis in order to free it from the trocar, but without damaging it. He then has to deploy the prosthesis and spread the latter out perfectly. If the prosthesis does not spread out perfectly against the abdominal wall for example, there may be a risk of a soft organ being inserted between the prosthesis and said wall, which can lead to risks of adherence, pain and intestinal occlusion and can increase the possibility of recurrence. It is therefore essential for the surgeon to ensure that no part of the prosthesis is folded and that no viscera or part of the intestine is caught between the prosthesis and the abdominal wall. However, on account of the limited space at the implantation site, it may prove complicated to deploy the prosthesis and then to orient it suitably with respect to the surrounding anatomical structures.


There is therefore still the need for a prosthesis that is based on a biocompatible textile, that can be used for the repair of hernias, that can be easily introduced into a conduit such as that of a trocar of small diameter, without damaging said textile, and that is able to be deployed completely, and preferably easily, once the implantation site in the body of the patient has been reached.


The present invention aims to meet such a need.


SUMMARY

A first aspect of the invention concerns a prosthesis comprising:

    • at least one flexible biocompatible textile having a shape defining a longitudinal axis A, and
    • at least one reinforcing element for said textile,
    • characterized in that said reinforcing element comprises at least one semi-rigid elongate structure connected to said textile, said structure being substantially parallel to said longitudinal axis A and having a distal end provided with at least one fastening element distinct from said textile and capable of cooperating with a part of a tool that is able to pass through said trocar, in order to temporarily couple said prosthesis to said tool.


In the present application, the longitudinal axis of a shape is understood as the axis aligned on the greatest dimension of said shape. In the case where said shape is a disc and does not have a greatest dimension, the longitudinal axis is a diameter of this disc.


In this application, the distal end of a device means the end farthest from the hand of the user, and the proximal end means the end nearest to the hand of the user. Likewise in this application, the term “distal direction” means the direction of introduction of the prosthesis into the body of the patient, and the term “proximal direction” means the direction opposite to this direction of introduction.


According to the present application, “textile” is understood as any arrangement or assembly of biocompatible yarns, fibres, filaments and/or multifilaments, for example obtained by knitting, weaving, braiding, or non-woven.


In the present application, “biocompatible” is understood as meaning that the materials having this property can be implanted in the human or animal body.


Within the meaning of the present application, a “flexible textile” is understood as a textile that can be folded up but that does not have an inherent elasticity allowing it to spontaneously recover a spread-out configuration once it has been folded up.


Within the meaning of the present application, a “semi-rigid structure” is understood as a structure having a rigidity that allows it to keep a textile spread out in the absence of any stress and to be gripped by instruments conventionally used in laparoscopic surgery, such as forceps, so as to be able to manipulate the textile, for example.


The prosthesis according to the invention is able to be easily gripped by a part of a tool conventionally used in laparoscopic surgery, for example by at least one of the jaws of a pair of forceps, and to be then introduced into a trocar by a simple distal movement towards the proximal entrance of the trocar, without first having to fold the prosthesis. The nature and the arrangement of the reinforcing element, provided with a fastening element at the distal end thereof, cause automatic folding along one or more longitudinal folds when, for example, a jaw of the forceps is engaged in the fastening element and the prosthesis is then transported towards the trocar. The forceps are then introduced into the proximal entrance of the trocar and pushed towards the distal end of the trocar. During this movement, the prosthesis is forced automatically to fold up along one or more longitudinal folds and, coupled to the forceps, it enters the trocar without difficulty. The prosthesis according to the invention could also be pushed into the trocar directly by hand by the surgeon, then by laparoscopy forceps in order to complete the introduction of the prosthesis into the abdomen of the patient, for example.


Thus, the prosthesis is able to adopt an elongate configuration, substantially aligned on its longitudinal axis A and very compact in the radial direction, allowing it to pass through a trocar without difficulty. The prosthesis can thus be folded in order to enter a trocar of small diameter, for example a diameter of 5 to 15 mm.


When the prosthesis emerges from the trocar, the surgeon can make use of the reinforcing element to deploy the prosthesis and return the latter to its initial spread-out configuration. The prosthesis is capable of conforming to the anatomical structures and of remaining in place once it has emerged from the trocar.


The textile of the prosthesis according to the invention can have any shape. The textile can have the shape of a disc, in which case one of its diameters defines the longitudinal axis A of the textile. In one embodiment, the textile has a generally elongate shape, for example a rectangular, oval or elliptic shape, defining a longitudinal axis A. The textile can have another initial shape and can then be cut to such an elongate shape, in particular to a shape adapted to the defect, for example the hernia defect, that is to be treated.


In one embodiment, said generally elongate shape is a rectangle. In another embodiment, said generally elongate shape is an ellipse. Such shapes are particularly advantageous, since they are similar to the anatomical shape of the defect that is to be filled. Moreover, such prostheses can adopt a compact shape that is substantially aligned on their longitudinal axis, permitting easy introduction into a trocar, even one of small diameter.


In one embodiment, the textile is a mesh.


Within the meaning of the present application, a “mesh” is understood as a textile, as defined above, which is openworked, that is to say provided with pores that favour recolonization of tissue. Such a mesh can be bioresorbable, permanent or partially bioresorbable. It is sufficiently flexible to be folded up at the time of introduction of the prosthesis into the trocar. Such meshes are well known to a person skilled in the art.


In one embodiment of the invention, the mesh is a knit. By virtue of the meshwork of the knit, it is possible to obtain openworked faces that promote cell recolonization after implantation. The knit can be two-dimensional or three-dimensional.


Within the meaning of the present application, a two-dimensional knit is understood as a knit having two opposite faces linked to each other by meshes but devoid of a spacer giving it a certain thickness: such a knit can be obtained, for example, by knitting yarns on a warp knitting machine or raschel knitting machine using two guide bars. Examples of knitting two-dimensional knits suitable for the present invention are given in the document WO2009/071998.


According to the present application, a three-dimensional knit is understood as a knit having two opposite faces linked to each other by a spacer that gives the knit a significant thickness, said spacer itself being formed from additional linking yarns in addition to the yarns forming the two faces of the knit. Such a knit can be obtained, for example, on a double-bed warp knitting or raschel knitting machine using several guide bars. Examples of knitting three-dimensional knits suitable for the present invention are given in the documents WO99/05990, WO2009/031035 and WO2009/071998.


The reinforcing element comprises at least one semi-rigid elongate structure connected to the textile, said structure being substantially parallel to said longitudinal axis A.


The materials that may be suitable for producing the reinforcing element, in particular said structure, of the prosthesis according to the invention may be chosen from any biocompatible material having a certain rigidity in order to meet the requirements described above.


In one embodiment, said reinforcing element is made of bioresorbable material. In the present application, “bioresorbable” or “biodegradable” is understood to mean that the materials having this property are absorbed and/or degraded by the tissues or washed from the implantation site and disappear in vivo after a certain time, which may vary, for example, from a few hours to a few months, depending on the chemical nature of the materials.


Thus, the reinforcing element acts as a guide for the prosthesis for introducing the latter into a trocar, then acts as a means of stiffening the prosthesis during the positioning and implanting of the prosthesis, after which it gradually degrades, for example when the prosthesis has been fixed or when the textile has been recolonized by the surrounding cells.


For example, the bioresorbable material can be chosen from among polylactic acid (PLA), polycaprolactones (PCL), polydioxanones (PDO), trimethylene carbonates (TMC), polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA), oxidized cellulose, polyglycolic acid (PGA), copolymers of these materials and mixtures thereof. For example, the bioresorbable material can be a copolymer of polylactic acid and of polyglycolic acid.


Alternatively, the reinforcing element of the prosthesis according to the invention is made of a non-bioresorbable material chosen from among polypropylenes, polyesters such as polyethylene terephthalates, polyamides, silicones, polyether ether ketone (PEEK), polyarylether ether ketone (PAEK), polyurethanes and mixtures thereof.


In another embodiment, the reinforcing element is formed by a combination of bioresorbable material and of non-bioresorbable material.


The reinforcing element, in particular said structure, of the prosthesis according to the invention is connected to said textile. For example, the reinforcing element can be fixed to the textile by sewing, ultrasonic welding, or else by adhesive bonding or moulding.


In one embodiment, the reinforcing element of the prosthesis according to the invention is moulded over the textile. Thus, the reinforcing element is connected to the textile by injection moulding of one or more thermoplastic or thermosetting biocompatible materials. For example, the mould of an injection-moulding machine is equipped with an insert gate in which the textile is held. One or more thermoplastic or thermosetting biocompatible materials are then heated to their melting point and injected into the mould, the latter having one or more channels of the shape desired for the reinforcing element. The holding of the textile, the precision of the injection volume and the choice of the injection parameters make it possible to obtain a reinforcing element without material loss, without flash and with good surface evenness. Such a method allows the reinforcing element to be fixed to the textile in a particularly effective and lasting way.


In one embodiment, the reinforcing element is obtained by moulding a copolymer of polylactic acid and of polyglycolic acid over the textile.


The semi-rigid elongate structure of the reinforcing element of the prosthesis according to the invention has a distal end provided with at least one fastening element distinct from said textile.


The fastening element of the prosthesis according to the invention is capable of cooperating with a part of a tool that is able to pass through said trocar, in order to temporarily couple said prosthesis to said tool. Thus, the fastening element can have any shape suitable for the engagement of a part of a tool that is able to pass through a trocar. For example, with the tool being intended to carry the prosthesis along with it in the distal direction, the fastening element can have any shape allowing an element, for example a projecting element, of the tool to be engaged in the fastening element when the tool is brought towards the fastening element by a distal movement.


The fastening element is preferably dimensioned so as to be able to receive a projecting element of a laparoscopy tool, for example a jaw of a pair of forceps, that can pass through a trocar of small diameter, for example a diameter of 10-15 mm, and also so as to be able itself to pass easily through the trocar when provided with the prosthesis. Thus, for example, for use of the prosthesis according to the invention with a trocar having an internal diameter of 15 mm, the fastening element has outer dimensions smaller than a circle with a diameter of 15 mm, preferably smaller than a circle with a diameter of 5 mm.


The present invention thus relates to a prosthesis comprising:

    • at least one flexible biocompatible textile having a shape defining a longitudinal axis A, and
    • at least one reinforcing element for said textile,
    • characterized in that said reinforcing element comprises at least one semi-rigid elongate structure connected to said textile, said structure being substantially parallel to said longitudinal axis A and having a distal end provided with at least one fastening element distinct from said textile, said fastening element having outer dimensions smaller than a circle with a diameter of 15 mm, preferably smaller than a circle with a diameter of 5 mm.


The fastening element is distinct from the textile. Thus, when the tool is engaged in the fastening element, said tool is not in contact with the textile, and the risks of the textile being damaged, for example by being caught by a projecting part of the tool, are avoided. Therefore, the integrity of the structure of the textile, in particular its openworked structure for example, is not affected when the tool is coupled to the prosthesis.


In one embodiment, the fastening element has the shape of a closed ring. Thus, for example, a jaw of a pair of forceps for a trocar can be easily engaged in said ring. This engagement makes it possible to couple the prosthesis to the forceps and to introduce the prosthesis into the trocar at the same time as the forceps, for example once the two jaws have been closed on each other.


In one embodiment, said fastening element has the shape of an open ring, the opening in the ring being situated substantially in the proximal region of the ring. Thus, when a part of the tool, for example a projecting element such as the jaw of a pair of forceps, approaches the fastening element via a distal movement with respect to the prosthesis, it can be engaged in the open ring. When the user continues the distal movement of the tool with respect to the prosthesis, the jaw engaged in the open ring comes into abutment against the non-open part of the ring, and the prosthesis is thereby coupled to the tool and is carried along with the tool in the distal direction.


In one embodiment, said structure comprises at least one rod segment extending parallel to the longitudinal axis A. Thus, during the introduction of the prosthesis into the trocar, the rod segment serves as a guide for the natural folding of the textile of the prosthesis along one or more longitudinal folds parallel to the rod segment.


In one embodiment, the reinforcing element comprises several of said structures parallel to one another, each being provided, at the distal end thereof, with a said fastening element. For example, said fastening elements are aligned along a line transverse to said longitudinal axis A. The surgeon can thus successively engage the different fastening elements with the same jaw of a pair of forceps, thereby obtaining a first folding of the textile along one or more longitudinal folds, before introducing the prosthesis into the trocar.


In one embodiment, said structure additionally comprises one or more oblique rod segments configured to promote the folding of the textile along one or more longitudinal folds when the textile is subjected to a radial pressure in the direction of its longitudinal axis A. For example, the oblique rod segments can be situated generally in a proximal region of the textile and can form an angle of 0 to 50.degree. with the longitudinal axis A, converging towards a rod segment parallel to the longitudinal axis situated in a distal region of the textile. Such an elongate structure allows the prosthesis to be folded up gradually as it enters the trocar, the two oblique rod segments serving as a guide for the textile as it folds up inside the trocar when the textile is subjected to the radial pressure acting in the direction of its longitudinal axis A and exerted by the walls of the trocar.


In one embodiment, the prosthesis additionally comprises an indicator of a defined location of the textile. For example, the prosthesis can comprise an indicator of the centre of the textile. The centre of the textile can be the centre of the prosthesis. Such an indicator can help the surgeon when placing the prosthesis in the implantation site, the visibility at such a site generally being reduced and/or obstructed by the presence of the surrounding organs. Such an indicator can be in the form of a geometric figure. In one embodiment, said indicator forms a part of said elongate structure.


In one embodiment, the prosthesis comprises a means of information concerning the orientation of the prosthesis. Thus, at the implantation site where the visibility is reduced, the surgeon can have information concerning the longitudinal or transverse direction of the prosthesis. In one embodiment, said means of information forms a part of said elongate structure.


In one embodiment of the invention, one face of the textile is covered by a non-stick coating.


Such a non-stick coating makes it possible in particular to avoid the formation of undesired and serious post-surgical fibrous adhesions.


Within the meaning of the present application, “non-stick” is understood as a smooth and non-porous biocompatible material or coating that does not offer space for cell recolonization and that preferably promotes the growth of new peritoneum.


Another aspect of the present invention is a method by which a prosthesis of the kind described above is conveyed to an implantation site, said method comprising the following steps:

    • a part of a tool that is able to pass through a trocar is engaged in the one or more fastening elements in order to couple the prosthesis to said tool,
    • the prosthesis is transported to the proximal entrance of the trocar by a distal movement of the tool,
    • said tool, coupled to the prosthesis, is introduced into the proximal orifice of the trocar, and said tool and the prosthesis inside the trocar are pushed by a distal force directed along the longitudinal axis of the trocar.


The prosthesis is thus pushed along the longitudinal axis of the trocar until its end, along with said tool, emerges from the trocar via the distal orifice thereof.


The push is continued until the whole prosthesis has emerged completely from the trocar.


By virtue of the structure of the prosthesis according to the invention, the step of introducing the prosthesis into the trocar is greatly facilitated. Likewise, with the prosthesis folding up automatically into a compact configuration as it penetrates into the proximal orifice of the trocar, it passes through the trocar easily and without damage.


Finally, the prosthesis is returned to its spread-out configuration at the implantation site by the surgeon unfolding the prosthesis. To do this, the surgeon can make use of the reinforcing element, which allows the unfolded prosthesis to be maintained in a spread-out state in the absence of any external stress.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The advantages of the present invention will become clearer from the following detailed description and from the attached drawings in which:



FIG. 1 shows a plan view of a first embodiment of a prosthesis according to the invention,



FIG. 2 shows a view of a step during which a jaw of a pair of forceps able to pass through a trocar is engaged in the fastening elements of the prosthesis of FIG. 1,



FIG. 3 is a view, on an enlarged scale, of a jaw of a pair of forceps being engaged in the fastening elements of the prosthesis of FIG. 1,



FIG. 4 is a view of the forceps of FIG. 2 engaged in the fastening elements of the prosthesis of FIG. 1 on emergence from the trocar,



FIG. 5 is a plan view of a second embodiment of the prosthesis according to the invention,



FIG. 6 is a plan view showing a step during which a jaw of a pair of forceps able to pass through a trocar is engaged in the fastening element of the prosthesis of FIG. 5.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS


FIG. 1 shows an embodiment of a prosthesis 1 according to the invention. The prosthesis 1 comprises a biocompatible textile 2 and a reinforcing element in the form of two semi-rigid elongate structures 8. Each elongate structure 8 comprises a rod segment 3 provided with a fastening element, in the form of a closed ring 4, at the distal end 3a thereof.


As will be seen from FIG. 1, the textile 2 has a generally elongate shape defining a longitudinal axis A. In another embodiment, the textile could have the shape of a disc, in which case one of the diameters of the disc would define the longitudinal axis of the textile.


Referring to FIG. 1, the textile 2 is thus delimited by a peripheral outer edge 2a forming substantially two opposite long sides 2b, which are substantially parallel to the longitudinal axis A, and two opposite short sides 2c, which are substantially perpendicular to the longitudinal axis A. In the example shown, the textile 2 has the general shape of a rectangle. Such an embodiment is suitable for the repair of a hernia of the abdominal wall, for example.


In other embodiments, the textile 2 could have an oval shape, or an elliptic shape, or be protean.


The textile 2 is made up of an arrangement of biocompatible filaments, such as a knit, a woven or a nonwoven. Preferably, as is shown in FIG. 1, the textile 2 is in the form of a mesh, that is to say it has openings for better tissue integration. For example, the textile 2 can be a two-dimensional or three-dimensional knit. Such textiles in the form of meshes or knits are well known to a person skilled in the art and are not described in any greater detail here.


The textile 2 can be bioresorbable, permanent or partially bioresorbable. As will become clear from the description below, the textile 2 is sufficiently flexible to be folded up, in particular at the time of introduction of the prosthesis into a trocar, along one or more longitudinal folds. In general, however, the textile 2 does not have an inherent elasticity allowing it to spontaneously recover a spread-out configuration once it has been folded up. The textile 2 can be supplied in the form of a band, which one cuts to the dimensions of the defect to be treated.


Referring again to FIG. 1, and as will become clear on reading the description below, the elongate structures 8 are parallel to each other and parallel to the longitudinal axis A. The rod segments 3 serve as an element for reinforcing the textile 2, in order to stiffen the latter and keep it in a substantially spread-out state in the absence of any external stress, as shown in FIG. 1, and also as a tool permitting both the manipulation of the textile 2 and the guiding of the prosthesis 1 upon introduction of the latter into a trocar, and also as a tool for assisting in the deployment of the prosthesis 1 when the latter emerges from the trocar at the implantation site. For this purpose, the elongate structures, in particular the rod segments 3, are connected to the textile 2 and have a rigidity allowing them to keep the textile 2 in its substantially spread-out state in the absence of any external stress, and allowing them to be gripped by a tool conventionally used in laparoscopic surgery, such as forceps intended to pass through a trocar.


The elongate structures 8, in particular the rod segments 3, are connected to the textile 2. They can be attached to the textile 2 by means of a seam, or else by means of an ultrasonic weld, by adhesive bonding, or by injection moulding.


In one embodiment, the rod segments 3 are joined to the textile by means of injection moulding. Such an embodiment makes it possible to secure the fixing of the rod segments 3 to the textile 2 in a particularly effective manner and to produce the prostheses according to the invention at an industrial scale.


In the technique of injection moulding, a mould is formed in which, for example with reference to the example shown in FIG. 1, a cavity is provided that is formed by two channels corresponding to the two rod segments 3 that are to be obtained, these two channels being parallel to each other. The textile is held in an insert gate of the mould, the long sides 2b of its peripheral outer edge 2a being parallel to the two channels. The thermoplastic material used to produce the rod segments, for example a copolymer of polylactic acid and of polyglycolic acid, is heated and injected into these channels using an injection moulding machine.


After the injection step, the mould is opened and the prosthesis 1 is withdrawn from the mould. Such a method allows the textile to be “embedded” in the part moulded over it. Thus, the rod segments 3, which are the overmoulded parts, are connected to the textile 2, without any risk of their coming loose or fragmenting.


On account of the nature and the structure of the rod segments 3, the latter act as guides for introducing the prosthesis 1 into a small orifice, such as an admission orifice of a trocar, as will become clear from the description below.


Thus, in order to easily introduce the prosthesis 1 of FIG. 1 into a trocar, the user makes use of a tool that is able to pass through a trocar, for example forceps 10 as shown in FIGS. 2 and 3. Referring to these figures, the forceps 10 are provided, at the distal end 10a thereof, with two jaws 11 that are capable of opening and closing in order to release or, by contrast, imprison a component. The user holds the forceps 10 with the two jaws open and engages one 11 of these two jaws successively into each of the two rings 4 present at the respective distal ends 3a of the rod segments 3 (see FIG. 3). On doing this, as shown in FIG. 2, one or more longitudinal folds 5 are created in the textile 2. Depending on the number of rod segments 3 present, the textile 2 can form one or more longitudinal folds 5, like an accordion.


In the example shown, the fastening element is a closed ring 4. It is clear from FIG. 3 that such a closed ring 4 could be replaced by an open ring (not shown), of which the opening would be situated in the proximal region of the ring. Indeed, since the forceps 10 are intended to be moved in the distal direction once coupled to the prosthesis 1, the absence of material in the proximal region of the ring does not prevent the effective coupling of the prosthesis to the forceps and the transport of the prosthesis in the distal direction by the tool, once the latter has been coupled to the prosthesis.


The ring 4 is dimensioned so as to be able to receive a jaw of a pair of forceps, that can pass through a trocar of small diameter, for example a diameter of 5-15 mm, and also so as to be able itself to pass easily through the trocar. Thus, for example, for using the prosthesis according to the invention with a trocar having an internal diameter of 5-15 mm, the ring 4 has an external diameter of less than 10 mm, for example of approximately 5 mm.


The fastening element, i.e. the closed ring 4 in the example shown, is distinct from the textile 2. The ring 4 is not moulded on the textile 2. This is because the ring 4 has to be able to receive a projecting element of a tool for laparoscopic surgery, in order to be able to couple the prosthesis to said tool, but said projecting element must not engage the textile 2 itself. Thus, when the tool is engaged in the ring 4, said tool is not in contact with the textile 2, and the risks of the textile 2 being damaged, for example by being caught by a projecting part of the tool, are avoided. Therefore, the integrity of the structure of the textile, in particular its openworked structure when the textile is a mesh for example, is not affected when the tool is coupled to the prosthesis.


Referring to FIGS. 2 and 3, it is clear that the jaw 11 engaged in the two rings 4 is not in contact with the textile 2 and, therefore, does not risk damaging the latter. As is shown in FIG. 3, the forceps 10 can be arranged in a position in which they are substantially aligned on the rod segments 3.


Thus, when a user moves the forceps 10 in the distal direction symbolized by the arrow F in FIG. 3, the prosthesis 1 is transported along with the forceps 10 in this same direction. The user then introduces the distal end 10a of the forceps 10 into the proximal entrance (not shown) of the trocar 12 shown in FIG. 4. As the user gradually pushes the distal end 10a of the forceps 10 inside the trocar 12 in the distal direction, the textile 2 is guided by the rod segments 3, which are semi-rigid, and it folds up along one or more longitudinal folds similar to the longitudinal folds 5 of FIG. 2 and aligned on the rod segments 3. Thus, the prosthesis 1 adopts a compact configuration that allows it to easily pass through the trocar 12. The rod segments 3 serve as guide elements for the folding of the prosthesis 1 along longitudinal folds.



FIG. 4 shows the distal end 10a of the forceps 10 after passage through the trocar 12, at the moment when the forceps emerge from the trocar 12 via the distal end 12a thereof. The textile 2 is coupled to a jaw 11 of the forceps 10 by engagement of the rings 4 in this jaw 11. The user continues to push the forceps 10 in the distal direction until the whole prosthesis 1 has emerged completely from the trocar 12. The user then uncouples the prosthesis 1 from the jaw 11 of the forceps 10, and he is then able to deploy the prosthesis 1 with the aid of the rod segments 3 in order to keep the textile 2, and therefore the prosthesis 1, in a spread-out state.


The prosthesis 1 is then ready to be positioned opposite a hernia defect that is to be treated. During the positioning of the prosthesis 1, the latter can be easily manipulated by means of tools conventionally used in laparoscopic surgery, these tools being able, among other things, to take hold of all or some of the elongate structures 8.



FIGS. 5 and 6 show another embodiment of the prosthesis 1 according to the invention, in which the textile 2 has generally the shape of an ellipse defining a longitudinal axis A. As in the preceding embodiment, the textile 2 is delimited by a peripheral outer edge 2a forming substantially two opposite long sides 2b, which are substantially parallel to the longitudinal axis A, and two opposite short sides 2c, which are substantially perpendicular to the longitudinal axis A. An ellipse shape of this kind is suitable for the repair or a hernia of the abdominal wall, for example.


In this embodiment, the reinforcing element comprises a semi-rigid elongate structure 8 comprising a rod segment 3, which is generally aligned on the longitudinal axis A and which is provided with a fastening element in the form of a closed ring 4 at the distal end 3a thereof. The rod segment 3 is situated in the distal region of the textile 2 and, therefore, of the prosthesis 1. The structure 8 additionally comprises two oblique rod segments 6, which each form an angle .alpha. with the longitudinal axis A and are generally situated proximally with respect to the proximal end of the rod segment 3. Finally, the elongate structure 8 also comprises a triangular frame 7 extending in the longitudinal direction and arranged between the rod segment 3 and the oblique rod segments 6. Such a shape of the structure 8 facilitates the automatic folding of the textile 2 along longitudinal folds at the moment when the textile 2, coupled to trocar forceps, is introduced into a trocar.


Furthermore, the triangular frame 7 forms an indicator of the centre of the textile 2 and also a means of information concerning the orientation of the prosthesis 1. This is because the triangular frame 7 itself is of elongate shape and indicates to the surgeon the longitudinal direction of the prosthesis 1. Finally, the short side of the triangular frame 7 indicates the proximal direction, while the angle opposite this short side indicates to the surgeon the distal direction. Such an indicator of a defined location of the textile and a such means of information concerning the prosthesis are particularly useful to the surgeon when the prosthesis 1 has reached the implantation site, where the field of view is reduced and/or obstructed by the presence of the surrounding organs.



FIG. 6 shows the step in which a jaw 11 of a pair of forceps 10 is coupled to the textile 2, and therefore to the prosthesis 1, with a view to introducing the prosthesis 1 into a trocar (not shown).


The prosthesis according to the invention can thus be easily introduced into a trocar, without any risk of forming a plug inside the trocar. By virtue of its nature and its structure, the reinforcing element of the prosthesis according to the invention stiffens the prosthesis and serves as an element for guiding and transporting the prosthesis inside a trocar conduit of particularly small diameter, such as a diameter of 5-15 mm. The reinforcing element, by stiffening the textile of the prosthesis, also serves to spread the prosthesis out at the moment when the latter emerges from the trocar at the implantation site.

Claims
  • 1. A method of conveying a prosthesis to an implantation site comprising: providing a prosthesis including at least one flexible biocompatible textile having a first face and second face opposite the first face, a shape defining a longitudinal axis, and a first reinforcing element separate from a second reinforcing element for said textile, wherein the first reinforcing element includes a first semi-rigid elongate structure fixed to the first face of the textile, the first semi-rigid elongate structure being substantially parallel to the longitudinal axis and having a distal end provided with a first fastening element having a shape of a first ring distinct from the textile, and the second reinforcing element includes a second semi-rigid elongate structure fixed to the first face of the textile, the second semi-rigid elongate structure being substantially parallel to the longitudinal axis and having a distal end provided with second fastening element having a shape of a second ring distinct from the textileengaging the first and second rings with a part to a tool configured to pass through a trocar, thereby coupling the prosthesis to the tool via the the first and second rings and creating two or more longitudinal folds in the textile,introducing the part of the tool coupled to the prosthesis into a proximal orifice of a trocar, andpassing the prosthesis through a distal orifice of the trocar to the site of implantation wherein the prosthesis unfolds to a spread-out configuration.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the part of the tool is a jaw member of a laparoscopic surgical tool.
  • 3. The method of claim 2, wherein the laparoscopic surgical tool is a surgical forceps.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein passing the prosthesis through the distal orifice of the trocar is continued until the whole prosthesis emerges completely from the trocar.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, further comprising uncoupling the prosthesis from the tool.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, further comprising positioning the prosthesis opposite a hernia defect at the site of implantation.
  • 7. The method of claim 6, further comprising fixing the prosthesis at the site of implantation.
  • 8. The method of claim 1, wherein the prosthesis automatically folds along one or more longitudinal folds.
  • 9. The method of claim 1, wherein the textile alone does not have an inherent elasticity allowing the prosthesis to spontaneously recover a spread-out configuration after folding.
  • 10. The method of claim 1, wherein the first ring, the second ring, or both is an open ring.
  • 11. The method of claim 10, wherein an opening in the open ring is situated substantially in a proximal region of the open ring.
  • 12. The method of claim 1, wherein the first ring, the second ring, or both is a closed ring.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
13/55261 Jun 2013 FR national
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a Divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/244,144 filed Jan. 10, 2019, which is a Continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/784,073 filed Oct. 13, 2015, which is a National Stage Application of PCT/EP14/061655 under 35 USC § 371 (a), which claims priority of French Patent Application Serial No. 13/55261 filed Jun. 7, 2013, the disclosures of each of the above-identified applications are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.

US Referenced Citations (347)
Number Name Date Kind
1187158 Mcginley Jun 1916 A
3118294 Van Laethem Jan 1964 A
3124136 Usher Mar 1964 A
3272204 Artandi et al. Sep 1966 A
3276448 Kronenthal Oct 1966 A
3320649 Naimer May 1967 A
3364200 Ashton et al. Jan 1968 A
3570482 Shigeru et al. Mar 1971 A
4006747 Kronenthal et al. Feb 1977 A
4060081 Yannas et al. Nov 1977 A
4173131 Melton et al. Nov 1979 A
4193137 Heck Mar 1980 A
4248064 Odham Feb 1981 A
4294241 Miyata Oct 1981 A
4307717 Hymes et al. Dec 1981 A
4338800 Matsuda Jul 1982 A
4476697 Schafer et al. Oct 1984 A
4487865 Balazs et al. Dec 1984 A
4500676 Balazs et al. Feb 1985 A
4511653 Play et al. Apr 1985 A
4527404 Nakagaki et al. Jul 1985 A
4591501 Cioca May 1986 A
4597762 Walter et al. Jul 1986 A
4603695 Ikada et al. Aug 1986 A
4631932 Sommers Dec 1986 A
4670014 Huc et al. Jun 1987 A
4709562 Matsuda Dec 1987 A
4748078 Doi et al. May 1988 A
4759354 Quarfoot Jul 1988 A
4769038 Bendavid et al. Sep 1988 A
4796603 Dahlke et al. Jan 1989 A
4813942 Alvarez Mar 1989 A
4841962 Berg et al. Jun 1989 A
4854316 Davis Aug 1989 A
4925294 Geshwind et al. May 1990 A
4931546 Tardy et al. Jun 1990 A
4942875 Hlavacek et al. Jul 1990 A
4948540 Nigam Aug 1990 A
4950483 Ksander et al. Aug 1990 A
4970298 Silver et al. Nov 1990 A
5002551 Linsky et al. Mar 1991 A
5122155 Eberbach Jun 1992 A
5147374 Fernandez Sep 1992 A
5162430 Rhee et al. Nov 1992 A
5171273 Silver et al. Dec 1992 A
5176692 Wilk et al. Jan 1993 A
5192301 Kamiya et al. Mar 1993 A
5196185 Silver et al. Mar 1993 A
5201745 Tayot et al. Apr 1993 A
5201764 Kelman et al. Apr 1993 A
5206028 Li Apr 1993 A
5217493 Raad et al. Jun 1993 A
5254133 Seid Oct 1993 A
5256418 Kemp et al. Oct 1993 A
5263983 Yoshizato et al. Nov 1993 A
5304595 Rhee et al. Apr 1994 A
5306500 Rhee et al. Apr 1994 A
5324775 Rhee et al. Jun 1994 A
5328955 Rhee et al. Jul 1994 A
5333624 Jonathan Aug 1994 A
5334527 Brysk Aug 1994 A
5339657 Mcmurray Aug 1994 A
5350583 Yoshizato et al. Sep 1994 A
5356432 Rutkow et al. Oct 1994 A
5368549 Mcvicker Nov 1994 A
5368602 Torre Nov 1994 A
5376375 Rhee et al. Dec 1994 A
5376376 Li Dec 1994 A
5383477 Dematteis Jan 1995 A
5397331 Himpens et al. Mar 1995 A
5399361 Song et al. Mar 1995 A
5405360 Jonathan Apr 1995 A
5413791 Rhee et al. May 1995 A
5425740 Hutchinson, Jr. Jun 1995 A
5428022 Palefsky et al. Jun 1995 A
5433996 Kranzler et al. Jul 1995 A
5441491 Verschoor et al. Aug 1995 A
5441508 Gazielly et al. Aug 1995 A
5456693 Conston et al. Oct 1995 A
5456711 Hudson Oct 1995 A
5466462 Rosenthal et al. Nov 1995 A
5480644 Freed Jan 1996 A
5487895 Dapper et al. Jan 1996 A
5490984 Freed Feb 1996 A
5512291 Li Apr 1996 A
5512301 Song et al. Apr 1996 A
5514181 Light et al. May 1996 A
5522840 Krajicek Jun 1996 A
5523348 Rhee et al. Jun 1996 A
5536656 Kemp et al. Jul 1996 A
5543441 Rhee et al. Aug 1996 A
5565210 Rosenthal et al. Oct 1996 A
5567806 Abdul-Malak et al. Oct 1996 A
5569273 Titone et al. Oct 1996 A
RE35399 Eisenberg Dec 1996 E
5593441 Lichtenstein et al. Jan 1997 A
5595621 Light et al. Jan 1997 A
5601571 Moss Feb 1997 A
5607474 Athanasiou et al. Mar 1997 A
5607590 Shimizu Mar 1997 A
5614587 Rhee et al. Mar 1997 A
5618551 Tardy et al. Apr 1997 A
5634931 Kugel Jun 1997 A
5639796 Lee Jun 1997 A
5665391 Lea Sep 1997 A
5667839 Berg Sep 1997 A
5681568 Goldin et al. Oct 1997 A
5686115 Vournakis et al. Nov 1997 A
5690675 Sawyer et al. Nov 1997 A
5695525 Mulhauser et al. Dec 1997 A
5697978 Sgro Dec 1997 A
5700476 Rosenthal et al. Dec 1997 A
5700477 Rosenthal et al. Dec 1997 A
5709934 Bell et al. Jan 1998 A
5716409 Debbas Feb 1998 A
5720981 Eisinger Feb 1998 A
5732572 Litton Mar 1998 A
5749895 Sawyer et al. May 1998 A
5752974 Rhee et al. May 1998 A
5766246 Mulhauser et al. Jun 1998 A
5766631 Arnold Jun 1998 A
5769864 Kugel Jun 1998 A
5771716 Schlussel Jun 1998 A
5785983 Furlan et al. Jul 1998 A
5800541 Rhee et al. Sep 1998 A
5814328 Gunasekaran Sep 1998 A
5833705 Ken et al. Nov 1998 A
5840011 Landgrebe et al. Nov 1998 A
5861034 Taira et al. Jan 1999 A
5863984 Doillon et al. Jan 1999 A
5869080 Mcgregor et al. Feb 1999 A
5871767 Dionne et al. Feb 1999 A
5876444 Lai Mar 1999 A
5891558 Bell et al. Apr 1999 A
5899909 Claren et al. May 1999 A
5906937 Sugiyama et al. May 1999 A
5910149 Kuzmak Jun 1999 A
5911731 Pham et al. Jun 1999 A
5916225 Kugel Jun 1999 A
5919232 Chaffringeon et al. Jul 1999 A
5919233 Knopf et al. Jul 1999 A
5922026 Chin Jul 1999 A
5931165 Reich et al. Aug 1999 A
5942278 Hagedorn et al. Aug 1999 A
5962136 Dewez et al. Oct 1999 A
5972022 Huxel Oct 1999 A
RE36370 Li Nov 1999 E
5993844 Abraham et al. Nov 1999 A
5994325 Roufa et al. Nov 1999 A
5997895 Narotam et al. Dec 1999 A
6001895 Harvey et al. Dec 1999 A
6008292 Lee et al. Dec 1999 A
6015844 Harvey et al. Jan 2000 A
6039686 Robert Mar 2000 A
6042534 Gellman et al. Mar 2000 A
6042592 Schmitt Mar 2000 A
6043089 Sugiyama et al. Mar 2000 A
6051425 Morota et al. Apr 2000 A
6056688 Benderev et al. May 2000 A
6056970 Greenawalt et al. May 2000 A
6057148 Sugiyama et al. May 2000 A
6063396 Kelleher May 2000 A
6066776 Goodwin et al. May 2000 A
6066777 Benchetrit May 2000 A
6071292 Makower et al. Jun 2000 A
6077281 Das Jun 2000 A
6080194 Pachence et al. Jun 2000 A
6083522 Chu et al. Jul 2000 A
6120539 Eldridge et al. Sep 2000 A
6132765 Dicosmo et al. Oct 2000 A
6143037 Goldstein et al. Nov 2000 A
6153292 Bell et al. Nov 2000 A
6165488 Tardy et al. Dec 2000 A
6171318 Kugel et al. Jan 2001 B1
6174320 Kugel et al. Jan 2001 B1
6176863 Kugel et al. Jan 2001 B1
6179872 Bell et al. Jan 2001 B1
6197325 Macphee et al. Mar 2001 B1
6197934 Devore et al. Mar 2001 B1
6197935 Doillon et al. Mar 2001 B1
6210439 Firmin et al. Apr 2001 B1
6221109 Geistlich et al. Apr 2001 B1
6224616 Kugel May 2001 B1
6241768 Agarwal et al. Jun 2001 B1
6258124 Darois et al. Jul 2001 B1
6262332 Ketharanathan Jul 2001 B1
6264702 Ory et al. Jul 2001 B1
6267772 Mulhauser et al. Jul 2001 B1
6277397 Shimizu Aug 2001 B1
6280453 Kugel et al. Aug 2001 B1
6287316 Agarwal et al. Sep 2001 B1
6290708 Kugel et al. Sep 2001 B1
6293906 Vanden Hoek et al. Sep 2001 B1
6306424 Vyakamnam et al. Oct 2001 B1
6312474 Francis et al. Nov 2001 B1
6328686 Robert Dec 2001 B1
6334872 Termin et al. Jan 2002 B1
6383201 Dong May 2002 B1
6391333 Li et al. May 2002 B1
6391939 Tayot et al. May 2002 B2
6408656 Ory et al. Jun 2002 B1
6410044 Chudzik et al. Jun 2002 B1
6413742 Olsen et al. Jul 2002 B1
6428978 Olsen et al. Aug 2002 B1
6436030 Rehil Aug 2002 B2
6440167 Shimizu Aug 2002 B2
6443964 Ory et al. Sep 2002 B1
6447551 Goldmann Sep 2002 B1
6447802 Sessions et al. Sep 2002 B2
6448378 Devore et al. Sep 2002 B2
6451032 Ory et al. Sep 2002 B1
6451301 Sessions et al. Sep 2002 B1
6454787 Maddalo et al. Sep 2002 B1
6477865 Matsumoto Nov 2002 B1
6479072 Morgan et al. Nov 2002 B1
6500464 Ceres et al. Dec 2002 B2
6509031 Miller et al. Jan 2003 B1
6511958 Atkinson et al. Jan 2003 B1
6514286 Leatherbury et al. Feb 2003 B1
6514514 Atkinson et al. Feb 2003 B1
6540773 Dong Apr 2003 B2
6541023 Andre et al. Apr 2003 B1
6548077 Gunasekaran Apr 2003 B1
6551356 Rousseau Apr 2003 B2
6554855 Dong Apr 2003 B1
6559119 Burgess et al. May 2003 B1
6566345 Miller et al. May 2003 B2
6575988 Rousseau Jun 2003 B2
6576019 Atala Jun 2003 B1
6596002 Therin et al. Jul 2003 B2
6596304 Bayon et al. Jul 2003 B1
6599323 Melican et al. Jul 2003 B2
6599524 Li et al. Jul 2003 B2
6599690 Abraham et al. Jul 2003 B1
6610006 Amid et al. Aug 2003 B1
6613348 Jain Sep 2003 B1
6623963 Mueller et al. Sep 2003 B1
6630414 Matsumoto Oct 2003 B1
6638284 Rousseau et al. Oct 2003 B1
6652594 Francis et al. Nov 2003 B2
6653450 Berg et al. Nov 2003 B1
6656206 Corcoran et al. Dec 2003 B2
6660280 Allard et al. Dec 2003 B1
6669735 Pelissier Dec 2003 B1
6682760 Noff et al. Jan 2004 B2
6685714 Rousseau Feb 2004 B2
6706684 Bayon et al. Mar 2004 B1
6706690 Reich et al. Mar 2004 B2
6719795 Bryan et al. Apr 2004 B1
6723335 Moehlenbruck et al. Apr 2004 B1
6730299 Tayot et al. May 2004 B1
6736823 Darois et al. May 2004 B2
6743435 Devore et al. Jun 2004 B2
6755868 Rousseau Jun 2004 B2
6773723 Spiro et al. Aug 2004 B1
6783554 Amara et al. Aug 2004 B2
6790213 Cherok et al. Sep 2004 B2
6790454 Abdul et al. Sep 2004 B1
6800082 Rousseau Oct 2004 B2
6833408 Sehl et al. Dec 2004 B2
6835336 Watt Dec 2004 B2
6852330 Bowman et al. Feb 2005 B2
6869938 Schwartz et al. Mar 2005 B1
6893653 Abraham et al. May 2005 B2
6896904 Spiro et al. May 2005 B2
6936276 Spiro et al. Aug 2005 B2
6939562 Spiro et al. Sep 2005 B2
6949625 Tayot Sep 2005 B2
6966918 Schuldt-Hempe et al. Nov 2005 B1
6971252 Therin et al. Dec 2005 B2
6974679 Andre et al. Dec 2005 B2
6974862 Ringeisen et al. Dec 2005 B2
6977231 Matsuda Dec 2005 B1
6988386 Okawa et al. Jan 2006 B1
7025063 Snitkin et al. Apr 2006 B2
7041868 Greene et al. May 2006 B2
RE39172 Bayon et al. Jul 2006 E
7098315 Schaufler Aug 2006 B2
7101381 Ford et al. Sep 2006 B2
7115220 Dubson et al. Oct 2006 B2
7156858 Schuldt-Hempe et al. Jan 2007 B2
7175852 Simmoteit et al. Feb 2007 B2
7192604 Brown et al. Mar 2007 B2
7207962 Anand et al. Apr 2007 B2
7214765 Ringeisen et al. May 2007 B2
7226611 Yura et al. Jun 2007 B2
7229453 Anderson et al. Jun 2007 B2
7594921 Browning Sep 2009 B2
7615065 Priewe et al. Nov 2009 B2
7670380 Cauthen, III et al. Mar 2010 B2
7709017 Tayot et al. May 2010 B2
7718556 Matsuda et al. May 2010 B2
7732354 Fricke et al. Jun 2010 B2
7785334 Ford et al. Aug 2010 B2
7799767 Lamberti et al. Sep 2010 B2
7806905 Ford et al. Oct 2010 B2
7824420 Eldridge et al. Nov 2010 B2
8142515 Therin et al. Mar 2012 B2
8197837 Jamiolkowski et al. Jun 2012 B2
8323675 Greenawalt Dec 2012 B2
8366787 Brown et al. Feb 2013 B2
8709094 Stad et al. Apr 2014 B2
8846060 Archibald et al. Sep 2014 B2
8877233 Obermiller et al. Nov 2014 B2
8956373 Ford et al. Feb 2015 B2
9034357 Stopek May 2015 B2
10213283 Bailly Feb 2019 B2
20020095218 Carr et al. Jul 2002 A1
20030086975 Ringeisen May 2003 A1
20030114937 Leatherbury et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030130745 Cherok et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030133967 Ruszczak et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030225355 Butler Dec 2003 A1
20040034373 Schuldt-Hempe et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040059356 Gingras Mar 2004 A1
20040087980 Ford May 2004 A1
20040101546 Gorman et al. May 2004 A1
20050002893 Goldmann Jan 2005 A1
20050021058 Negro Jan 2005 A1
20050085924 Darois et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050113849 Popadiuk et al. May 2005 A1
20050137512 Campbell et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050142161 Freeman et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050148963 Brennan Jul 2005 A1
20050171569 Girard et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050175659 Macomber et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050232979 Shoshan Oct 2005 A1
20050267521 Forsberg Dec 2005 A1
20050288691 Eiboff Dec 2005 A1
20060064175 Pelissier et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060135921 Wiercinski et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060147501 Hillas et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060216320 Kitazono et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060252981 Matsuda et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060259074 Kelleher et al. Nov 2006 A1
20070088189 Levy Apr 2007 A1
20070299538 Roeber Dec 2007 A1
20080206305 Herweck et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080306497 Brown et al. Dec 2008 A1
20100292718 Sholev et al. Nov 2010 A1
20110077457 Deitch Mar 2011 A1
20110152897 Bates Jun 2011 A1
20110288567 Ranucci et al. Nov 2011 A1
20120209301 Bell et al. Aug 2012 A1
20130035704 Dudai Feb 2013 A1
20130060263 Bailly et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130231526 Felix et al. Sep 2013 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (97)
Number Date Country
1317836 May 1993 CA
19544162 Apr 1997 DE
10019604 Oct 2001 DE
10043396 Jun 2002 DE
0194192 Sep 1986 EP
0248544 Dec 1987 EP
0276890 Aug 1988 EP
0372969 Jun 1990 EP
0544485 Jun 1993 EP
0552576 Jul 1993 EP
0614650 Sep 1994 EP
0621014 Oct 1994 EP
0625891 Nov 1994 EP
0637452 Feb 1995 EP
0705878 Apr 1996 EP
0719527 Jul 1996 EP
0774240 May 1997 EP
0797962 Oct 1997 EP
0827724 Mar 1998 EP
0836838 Apr 1998 EP
0895762 Feb 1999 EP
0898944 Mar 1999 EP
1017415 Jul 2000 EP
1052319 Nov 2000 EP
1055757 Nov 2000 EP
1216717 Jun 2002 EP
1216718 Jun 2002 EP
0693523 Nov 2002 EP
1315468 Jun 2003 EP
1382728 Jan 2004 EP
1484070 Dec 2004 EP
1561480 Aug 2005 EP
1782848 May 2007 EP
2244853 Apr 1975 FR
2257262 Aug 1975 FR
2308349 Nov 1976 FR
2453231 Oct 1980 FR
2715405 Jul 1995 FR
2724563 Mar 1996 FR
2744906 Aug 1997 FR
2766698 Feb 1999 FR
2771622 Jun 1999 FR
2779937 Dec 1999 FR
2859624 Dec 2005 FR
2863277 Jun 2006 FR
2884706 Apr 2008 FR
2051153 Jan 1981 GB
H0332677 Mar 1991 JP
105237128 Sep 1993 JP
H09137380 May 1997 JP
8902445 Mar 1989 WO
8908467 Sep 1989 WO
9012551 Nov 1990 WO
9206639 Apr 1992 WO
9220349 Nov 1992 WO
9311805 Jun 1993 WO
9318174 Sep 1993 WO
9417747 Aug 1994 WO
9507666 Mar 1995 WO
9518638 Jul 1995 WO
9532687 Dec 1995 WO
9603091 Feb 1996 WO
9608277 Mar 1996 WO
9609795 Apr 1996 WO
9614805 May 1996 WO
9641588 Dec 1996 WO
9735533 Oct 1997 WO
9835632 Aug 1998 WO
9849967 Nov 1998 WO
9905990 Feb 1999 WO
9906079 Feb 1999 WO
9906080 Feb 1999 WO
9951163 Oct 1999 WO
0016821 Mar 2000 WO
0067663 Nov 2000 WO
0115625 Mar 2001 WO
0180773 Nov 2001 WO
0207648 Jan 2002 WO
0222047 Mar 2002 WO
02078568 Oct 2002 WO
03002168 Jan 2003 WO
2004004600 Jan 2004 WO
2004071349 Aug 2004 WO
2004078120 Sep 2004 WO
2004103212 Dec 2004 WO
2005011280 Feb 2005 WO
2005013863 Feb 2005 WO
2005018698 Mar 2005 WO
2005105172 Nov 2005 WO
2006018552 Feb 2006 WO
2006023444 Mar 2006 WO
2009071998 Jun 2009 WO
2009031035 Jan 2010 WO
2010027898 Mar 2010 WO
2007048099 Sep 2010 WO
2013007534 Jan 2013 WO
2013017836 Feb 2013 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (34)
Entry
Amid, P., “Lichtenstein tension-free hernioplasty: Its inception, evolution, and principles,” Hernia, 2004; pp. 1-7, 8, published online Sep. 2003.
Australian Examination Report dated Jun. 27, 2018 in corresponding Australian Patent Application No. 2014276851.
Australian Examination Report for application No. 2014276851 dated Mar. 16, 2018 (3 pages).
Blondin, C. et al., “Inhibition of Complement Activation by Natural Sulfated Polysaccharides (Fucans) from Brown Seaweed,” Molecular Immuol., Mar. 1994, pp. 247-253, 31(4).
Blondin, C. et al., “Relationships between chemical characteristics and anticomplementary activity of fucans,” Biomaterials, Mar. 1996, pp. 597-603, 17(6).
Boisson-Vidal, C. et al., “Neoangiogenesis Induced by Progenitor Endothelial Cells: Effect of Fucoidan From Marine Algae,” Cardiovascular & Hematological Agents in Medicinal Chem., Jan. 2007, pp. 67-77, 5(1).
Bracco, P. et al., “Comparison of polypropylene and polyethylene terephthalate (Dacron) meshes for abdominal wall hernia repair: A chemical and morphological study,” Hernia, 2005, pp. 51-55, 9 (1), published online Sep. 2004.
Canadian Office Action issued in Canadian Application No. 2,911,477 dated May 7, 2020, 4 pages.
Collins, R. et al., “Use of collagen film as a dural substitute: Preliminary animal studies,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, Feb. 1991, pp. 267-276, vol. 25.
Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC issued in European Patent Application No. 14729284.1 dated Feb. 25, 2019, 4 pages.
Ellouali, M. et al., “Antitumor Activity of Low Molecular Weight Fucans Extracted from Brown Seaweed Ascophyllum Nodosum,” Anticancer Res., Nov.-Dec. 1993, pp. 2011-2020, 12 (6A).
Haneji, K et al., “Fucoidan extracted from Cladosiphon Okamuranus Tokida Induces Apoptosis of Human T-cell Leukemia Virus Type 1-Infected T-Cell Lines and Primary Adult T-Cell Leukemia Cells,” Nutrition and Cancer, 2005, pp. 189-201, 52(2), published online Nov. 2009.
Haroun-Bouhedja, F. et al., “In Vitro Effects of Fucans on MDA-MB231 Tumor Cell Adhesion and Invasion,” Anticancer Res., Jul.-Aug. 2002, pp. 2285-2292, 22(4).
Haroun-Bouhedja, F. et al., “Relationship between sulfate groups and biological activities of fucans,” Thrombosis Res., Dec. 2000, pp. 453-459, 100(5).
Hirano, S. et al., “The blood biocompatibility of chitosan and N-acylchitosans,” J. Biomed. Mater. Res., Apr. 1985, 413-417, 19.
International Search Report for PCT/EP14/061655 date of completion is Jul. 9, 2014 (3 pages).
Junge, K. et al., “Functional and Morphologic Properties of a Modified Mesh for Inguinal Hernia Repair,” World J. Surg., Sep. 2002, pp. 1472-1480, 26.
Kanabar, V. et al., “Some structural determinants of the antiproliferative effect of heparin-like molecules on human airway smooth muscle,” Br. J. Pharmacol., Oct. 2005, pp. 370-777, 146(3).
Klinge, U. et al., “Foreign Body Reaction to Meshes Used for the Repair of Abdominal Wall Hernias,” Eur J. Surg, Sep. 1999, pp. 665-673, 165.
Klinge, U. et al., “Functional and Morphological Evaluation of a Low-Weight, Monofilament Polypropylene Mesh for Hernia Repair,” J. Biomed. Mater. Res., Jan. 2002, pp. 129-136, 63.
Langenbech, M. R. et al., “Comparison of biomaterials in the early postoperative period,” Surg Endosc., May 2003, pp. 1105-1109, 17 (7).
Logeart, D. et al., “Fucans, sulfated polysaccharides extracted from brown seaweeds, inhibit vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation. II. Degradation and molecular weight effect,” Eur. J. Cell. Biol., Dec. 1997, pp. 385-390, 14(4).
Malette, W. G. et al., “Chitosan, A New Hemostatic,” Ann Th. Surg., Jul. 1983, pp. 55-58, 36.
Muzzarelli, R. et al., “Reconstruction of parodontal tissue with chitosan,” Biomaterials, Nov. 1989, pp. 598-604, 10.
O'Dwyer, P. et al., “Randomized clinical trial assessing impact of a lightweight or heavyweight mesh on chronic pain after inguinal hernia repair,” Br. J. Surg., Feb. 2005, pp. 166-170, 92(2).
Preliminary Search Report from French Patent Office dated Dec. 20, 2006, 3 pages.
Prokop, A. et al., “Water Soluble Polymers for Immunoisolation I: Complex Coacevation and Cytotoxicity,” Advances in Polymer Science, Jul. 1998, pp. 1-51, 136.
Rao, B. et al., “Use of chitosan as a biomaterial: Studies on its safety and hemostatic potential,” J. Biomed. Mater. Res., Jan. 1997, pp. 21-28, 34.
Rosen, M. et al., “Laparoscopic component separation in the single-stage treatment of infected abdominal wall prosthetic removal,” Hernia, 2007, pp. 435-440, 11, published online Jul. 2007.
Scheidbach, H. et al., “In vivo studies comparing the biocompatibility of various polypropylene meshes and their candling properties during endoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) patchplasty: An experimental study in pigs,” Surg. Endosc., Feb. 2004, pp. 211-220, 18(2).
Strand, S. et al., “Screening of Chitosans and Conditions for Bacterial Flocculation,” Biomacromolecules, Mar. 2001, 126-133, 2.
Varum, K. et al., “In vitro degradation rates of partially N-acetylated chitosans in human serum,” Carbohydrate Research, Mar. 1997, pp. 99-101, 299.
Welty, G. et al., “Functional impairment and complaints following incisional hernia repair with different polypropylene meshes,” Hernia, Aug. 2001; pp. 142-147, 5.
Zvyagintseva, T. et al., “Inhibition of complement activation by water-soluble polysaccharides of some far-eastern brown seaweeds,” Comparative Biochem and Physiol, Jul. 2000, pp. 209-215, 126(3).
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20220233295 A1 Jul 2022 US
Divisions (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 16244144 Jan 2019 US
Child 17720859 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 14784073 US
Child 16244144 US