The present disclosure is directed to seat decks for furniture items. More specifically, the present disclosure is directed to a seat deck fabricated primarily from textile materials.
Conventional seat boxes for sofas and love seats include a framework that is spanned by a plurality of sinuous-shaped springs. The sinuous springs are typically pre-bowed along their axes, and mounted to the seat box so as to form a “crown” (i.e., a are bowed or convex in an upward direction relative to the seat box). Each sinuous spring is mounted to the seat box with special clips, one disposed at each end of each sinuous spring. The clips are aligned and mounted on opposing forward and rearward structures on the seat box, and the sinuous spring stretched between and joined to the clips. To accomplish the stretching operation, typical tension forces of nominally 65 pounds-force (lbf) are required. Only after installation of the sinuous springs may a textile overlay be mounted over the sinuous springs.
Assembly of conventional seat boxes described above thus requires fabrication of the specialized clips and the pre-bowed sinuous springs, both of which are typically fabricated from metal. Alignment of the clips and the mounting and stretching of the sinuous springs requires time and careful attention, in addition to the time and attention required to install the textile overlay. The task of mounting and stretching the sinuous springs is a perilous task, with resulting injuries to assemblers being a leading cause of workman compensation claims in the furniture industry. Furthermore, because the cushions are supported by the sinuous springs, the sinuous springs cannot be spaced too far apart. Center-to-center spacing of sinuous springs that is nominally 3.5 inches is typical in the industry, thus imparting a distributed load on the furniture frame that exceeds 18 pounds per lineal inch.
Moreover, the sinuous springs often fail a “drop test” where a 200 pound weight is dropped onto the seat box a total of 10 times, each time from a height of six inches. The drop test is intended to simulate conditions that furniture items often incur after purchase. During such drop testing, some of the sinuous springs are often dislodged from the clips, demonstrating that the conventional seat box does not hold up under the rigors of use.
A seat frame assembly that reduces the parts required for installation, simplifies the installation process, and performs better under drop test conditions would be welcomed.
Various embodiments of the disclosure include a textile deck assembly installed in or for installation in a furniture assembly. The textile deck assembly includes a platform portion partially suspended by straps disposed under the backrest of the furniture item. In one embodiment, the platform portion, while flexible, is stretch resistant, while the straps are configured to elongate under load to provide a comfortable degree of compliance. Surprisingly, the textile deck assembly is much more durable than conventional seat decks that utilize sinuous springs. Various tests on the disclosed furniture assembly reveal that, even after catastrophic failure of the structural elements of the seat box, the textile deck assembly of the present disclosure remained intact and operable, and under conditions where the seat deck of the counterpart conventional sofa would experience 100% failure. Endurance testing also revealed that, after being subjected to the rigors of standardized fatigue and drop testing, the permanent sag of the disclosed textile deck assembly was less than ¼ than that of the conventional sofa, and the downward deflection of the disclosed textile deck assembly under load was less than ⅓ than that of the conventional sofa.
The forces required for installing the disclosed seat deck assemblies in a furniture assembly is also substantially reduced over that of conventional sinuous spring assemblies. First, the disclosed seat deck assemblies provide continuous support across the lower face of the seat cushions, as opposed to support provided primarily by sinuous springs that span under the cushions. This enables fewer spring members to be utilized to fully support the seat cushions. Second, because the spring members of the disclosed embodiments are a fraction of the length of the sinuous springs of conventional furniture assemblies and are not required to support the seat cushions, they do not have to be drawn as tautly as the sinuous springs in conventional furniture assemblies. That is, because the vertical deflection over the shorter length of the disclosed spring members does not adversely affect the support of the seat cushions, the installation forces required is reduced. In the disclosed embodiments, the force required per spring member is typically less than 80% of the force required for installation of sinuous springs, and the number of spring members is typically less than half the number of sinuous springs required in conventional furniture assemblies. Also, the counter forces required of the seat frame in the disclosed embodiments is in the range of 20% to 50% of conventional seat assemblies, thus reducing distortion and material requirements.
Structurally, in various embodiments of the disclosure, a furniture assembly comprises a furniture frame with a forward frame member configured as a forward rail, a rearward frame member configured as a rearward rail, a pair of side frame members and a deck assembly. The deck assembly may include a flexible sheet platform portion including a forward edge and a rearward edge, an edge stiffener configured as a yoke member disposed proximate the rearward edge of the flexible sheet platform portion, and a plurality of spring members coupled to the yoke member, the plurality of spring members extending rearward of the rearward edge of the flexible sheet platform portion. The flexible sheet platform portion may be a textile platform portion. In embodiments the rectangular platform maybe woven with thread, rope, or straps. There may be apertures in the woven platform. The forward edge of the flexible sheet platform portion is directly attached to the forward rail, and the rearward edge of the flexible sheet platform portion is coupled to the rearward rail via the yoke member and the plurality of spring members, the plurality of spring members extending rearward of the rearward edge.
The yoke member acts to distribute tension loads imparted by the plurality of spring members along the rearward edge of the flexible sheet platform portion. The yoke member may be one of a rod, a bar, and a tubing. Optionally, the yoke member may be one of a rope and a strap affixed directly to the rearward edge of the flexible sheet platform portion. In some embodiments, the forward edge of the flexible sheet platform portion is directly attached to the forward rail with a plurality of fasteners that are spaced less than one inch apart along the forward edge. The plurality of spring members are spaced apart along the rearward edge to define a center-to-center spacing between adjacent ones of the plurality of spring members. In some embodiments, the center-to-center spacing may be in a range of 4 inches to 12 inches inclusive. The plurality of spring members may be selected from the group consisting of elastic straps, elastic cords, and coil springs. In some embodiments, a seat frame assembly includes a front wall and two opposed side walls, the forward rail being affixed to the front wall. The flexible sheet platform portion may include opposing side edges that extend between the forward edge and the rearward edge, each of the opposing side edges being directly attached to a respective one of the two opposed side frame members such as walls of the frame assembly.
In various embodiments of the disclosure, a textile deck assembly for a furniture item comprises a textile platform portion including a forward edge, a rearward edge, and opposed side edges; at least one yoke member disposed proximate the rearward edge of the textile platform portion; and a plurality of straps coupled to the at least one yoke member, the plurality of straps extending rearward of the rearward edge of the textile platform portion. The plurality of straps are configured for greater elongation in a fore and aft direction than the textile platform portion when the textile deck assembly is placed under a tension load in the fore and aft direction. The textile platform portion may include a plurality of platform loops that define the rearward edge of the textile platform portion, and wherein the at least one yoke member is captured within the plurality of platform loops.
In some embodiments, the at least one yoke member is a plurality of yoke members that extend end to end along a yoke axis through the platform loops, and wherein adjacent ends of the plurality of yoke members are disposed within the platform loops. The plurality of yoke members may be rigid. In some embodiments, at least one guide strip is disposed at and defines the forward edge of the textile platform portion. The at least one guide strip may be a plurality of guide strips that extend end to end, and wherein each of the plurality of guide strips are approximately the same length as a corresponding one of the plurality of yoke members, so that fold axes are defined that pass between adjacent ends of the plurality of guide strips and between the adjacent ends of the plurality of yoke members, the fold axes being substantially perpendicular to the yoke axis.
In some embodiments, the textile deck assembly is folded along the fold axes. For some embodiments, when the textile deck assembly is subject to an increased tension load in the fore and aft direction, the plurality of straps elongates more than the textile platform portion in the fore and aft direction. In various embodiments, when the textile deck assembly is subject to the increased tension load in the fore and aft direction, the plurality of straps elongate an average first dimension in the fore and aft direction and the textile platform portion elongates an average second dimension in the fore and aft direction, wherein a ratio of the average second dimension to the average first dimension is less than 1:4. In some embodiments, the ratio of the average second dimension to the average first dimension is less than 1:8. In some embodiments, the ratio of the average second dimension to the average first dimension is less than 1:16. In some embodiments, the ratio of the average second dimension to the average first dimension is less than 1:32.
In some embodiments, the textile deck assembly comprises a plurality of strap clips, each coupled to a respective one of the plurality straps, for affixing the plurality of straps to a rearward rail to maintain the textile deck assembly in tension. Each of the plurality of strap clips may include a cross portion supported by a pair of hook portions, each of the hook portions having a proximal end attached to the cross portion and a free distal end. In some embodiments, a first of the pair of hook portions and a second of the pair of hook portions defines a gap therebetween. In some embodiments, the first of the pair of hook portions and the second of the pair of hook portions are a mirrored about a central plane that is orthogonal to the cross portion.
In various embodiments of the disclosure, a method is disclosed for installing the textile deck assembly to a seat frame assembly, comprising: affixing the forward edge of the textile platform portion to a forward rail of the seat frame assembly; stretching the textile deck assembly in a rearward direction from the forward rail to place the textile deck assembly in tension; and affixing the plurality of straps to a rearward rail to maintain the textile deck assembly in tension. In some embodiments, the method includes: (a) inserting a shaft through one of the plurality of straps; (b) placing the shaft against a rearward face of the rearward rail; and (c) rotating the shaft in a rearward direction to stretch the textile deck assembly. During the step of rotating, the shaft may be brought into contact with an underside of the rearward rail.
In various embodiments of the disclosure, a method for mounting a textile seat deck to a furniture assembly is disclosed, the method comprising gripping a strap clip that is coupled to a first end of a strap, the strap having a second end that is coupled to a textile platform portion, the textile platform portion being attached to a seat frame assembly; pulling the strap clip from a first location over a rail to a second location where at least a hook portion of the strap clip is pulled past an edge of the rail, wherein pulling the strap clip from the first location to the second location increases a tension applied to the strap and the textile platform portion; aligning the hook portion of the strap clip with the rail so that releasing the pulling of the strap clip will cause the hook portion to clip on to the rail; and releasing the strap clip. The method may also include the step of securing the strap clip to the strap. In some embodiments, the strap clip is secured to the rail by the tension force applied by the strap and the platform portion. The step of gripping may include engaging a tool with the hook portion of the strap clip. The step of pulling may be performed with the tool. In some embodiments, the method includes moving the tool in a direction along the edge of the rail to remove the tool from a gap defined between the hook portion and the edge of the rail.
In embodiments the seat deck has a plurality of spaced spring members at the rearward edge for connection to a rearward frame member, no spring members at a forward edge and no spring members at a pair of side edges. A feature and advantage of embodiments is that three of four sides of a flexible rectangular platform can be attached with simple staples. A feature and advantage of embodiments is a spring loaded sofa platform that has springs on only one of four sides of a rectangular flexible platform. A feature and advantage of embodiments is that the springs at only a single edge are positioned under the backrest portion of a sofa whereby they are exposed to minimal or no direct downward loading by a person sitting on the seat of the sofa. As such the springs can be coil springs or elastic strap springs.
Referring to
The seat frame assembly 32 further includes a forward rail 82 and a rearward rail 84. In the depicted embodiment, the forward rail 82 is affixed to the interior face 52 of the front wall 42. The rearward rail 84 is suspended from the side walls 46 or the uprights 62 and 64, or from both the side walls 46 and one or more of the uprights 62 and 64. In the depicted embodiment, a forward gusset 86 is affixed to the cross-brace 74 and extends and is affixed to the front wall 42 and the forward rail 82. A rearward gusset 88 may extend between and be affixed to the cross-brace 74, the rearward rail 84, and the mid-upright 64. In some embodiments, the seat frame assembly 32 is fabricated from wood or wood products. Assemblies of varying configurations are contemplated and it is apparent that the seat frame assembly 32 of varying configurations are within the spirit and scope of this disclosure.
A Cartesian coordinate 89 is depicted in
Referring to
The RTA furniture assembly 31 incorporates the same basic construction principles and implementation with respect to the textile deck assemblies 36 as described for the furniture assembly 30. In some embodiments (not depicted), the upper edges across the mid-span of the interior side walls 46a and 46b are recessed or cut away relative to the upper edges of the at the ends to enable deflection of the platform portion 90 under load. The RTA furniture assembly 31 further depicts an upholstery covering over the back frame assembly 34 and seat frame assembly 32. It is understood that such upholstery covering may be present in
Functionally, the segmentation of the RTA furniture assembly 31 enables the RTA furniture assembly 31 to be shipped within a smaller package than would be permitted for a fully assembled furniture item such as the furniture assembly 30. See U.S. Pat. Pub. US 2017/0071354 which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety for all purposes. The RTA furniture assembly 31 can also facilitate storage.
Referring to
In the depicted embodiment, guide strips 108 are aligned substantially with the forward edge 92 of the platform portion 90 and attached to the platform portion 90. While a plurality of guide strips 108 are depicted, a single guide strip 108 extending the length of the forward edge 92 is also contemplated. The guide strip(s) 108 may be made of a material suitable for driving fasteners (e.g., staples or screws) therethrough, such as a thin layer of cardboard, tag board, or polymer, or a textile strip. In some embodiments, the straps 98 are looped around the yoke member(s) 102 to form strap loops 112 at a forward end 113. Each of the straps 98 may be fitted with a stiffening band 114 attached to the respective strap 98, each stiffening band 114 including a forward edge 116 and a rearward edge 118 (
Example materials for the platform portion 90 include a canvas or tent-like material, such as a woven fabric of polyester having a linear mass density of 1200 denier (D) (e.g., 1200 D×1200 D polyester). In some embodiments, the platform portion 90 includes a coating on at least one side to inhibit fraying of the textile fibers and to inhibit local separation of the woven fabric. The coating may be, for example, of a polyethylene or polyurethane material. Example materials for the straps 98 include a blend of propylene (PP) and rubber thread interwoven together. In one embodiment, the straps 98 comprise an interwoven composition of PP flat yarn having a linear mass density of 1000 D, PP multifilament yarn of 1200 D, and 24 gauge bare rubber thread, with a maximum elongation of 90% relative to the unstressed length. In one embodiment, the nominal width (lateral dimension in
Referring to
The rearward edge 124 is folded about the yoke axis 132, and the margin strip 136 attached to the body of the textile 120 (
At this point in the assembly (
The embodiments depicted at
In the depicted embodiment, a plurality of yoke members 102 are depicted end to end along the yoke axis 132 (
Functionally, the yoke member(s) 102 are acted upon by both the strap loops 112 and the platform loops 142 (
The stiffener members 114, when utilized, can assist the assembler in handling of the straps 98, helping to maintain the width (lateral dimension) of the straps 98 during assembly so that the straps are properly laid out on the rearward rail 84. The extended stiffener member 115 (
Referring to
The tension load 158 represents the tension on the textile deck assembly 36 due to installation of the textile deck assembly 36 in a loaded condition (e.g., with an occupant seated on the furniture assembly 30) and is caused by the combination of the load and the tensioning of the textile deck assembly 36 during assembly. The tension loads 156 and 158 are depicted as being exerted in the fore-and-aft direction (i.e., parallel to the x-axis of the Cartesian coordinate 89 of
Fore-and-aft dimensions of the platform portion 90 are identified as L90a and L90b for the textile deck assembly 36 under the first and second tension loads 156 and 158, respectively. The L90a and L90b dimensions are taken from the rearward edge 94 to the forward edge 92 of the platform portion 90. Fore-and-aft dimensions of the plurality of straps 98 are identified as L98a and L98b for the same textile deck assembly 36 under the first and second tension loads 156 and 158, respectively. For each of the plurality of straps 98, a forward datum for the dimensions L98a and L98b is from a forward extremity 160 where the strap 98 loops around and contacts the yoke member(s) 102, and a rearward datum is taken to the a reference line R corresponding to a nominal location on the strap 98 where the strap 98 is anchored to the rearward rail 84. For example, for seat box assemblies 32 where the strap 98 is stapled to an upper face 188 of the rearward rail 84, the nominal location would be a line 161 representing an average location of the forward-most staples, identified in
Upon increasing from the tension load 156 to the tension load 158, the platform portion 90 and the plurality of straps 98 generally experience average elongations Δ90 and Δ98, respectively. In some embodiments, an elongation ratio Δ90/Δ98 of the average elongation Δ90 of the platform portion 90 to the average elongation Δ98 of the plurality of straps 98 is less than 1:4; that is, for such an embodiment, if the average elongation Δ98 of the plurality of strap is 2 inches, the average elongation Δ90 of the platform portion 90 would be less than ½ inches. In some embodiments, the elongation ratio Δ90/Δ98 is less than 1:8; in some embodiments, the elongation ratio Δ90/Δ98 is less than 1:16; in some embodiments, the elongation ratio Δ90/Δ98 is less than 1:32.
Referring to
With the forward edge 92 of the platform portion 90 attached to the forward rail 82, the rearward edge 94 of the textile deck assembly 36 is pulled toward the rearward rail 84, and at least one of the side edges 96 aligned with the adjacent corresponding side wall 46. The straps 98 are pulled taut and attached to the rearward rail 84. In the
The shaft 172 is inserted through the aperture or slit 176 and brought into contact with a rearward face 174 of the rearward rail 84 (
In some embodiments, the strap 98 includes a reference mark 182, such as a sewn seam or an ink line (
The pull tool 170 is used to properly position the strap 98 on the rearward rail 84 by leveraging the shaft 172 against the rearward face 174 or the underside 178 of the rearward rail 84, with the shaft inserted through the slit or aperture 176. When properly positioned, the strap 98 is fastened to the rearward rail 84. In some embodiments, the straps 98 are secured to a top face 188 of the rearward rail 84 (
Functionally, the displacement of the platform portion 90 and straps 98 required to align the marks (e.g., line 182 or edge 116, 118 of stiffening band 114) with features of the rearward rail 84 is predetermined to provide the desired installation tension force on the textile deck assembly 36 after installation on the seat frame assembly 32. In some embodiments, the installation tension force on each strap 98 is in a range of 30 pounds-force (lbf) to 70 lbf inclusive; in some embodiments, the installation force is in a range of 40 lbf to 60 lbf inclusive; in some embodiments, the installation force is in a range of 45 lbf to 55 lbf inclusive. In one embodiment, the installation tension force is nominally 51 lbf. This is substantially lower than the nominal 65 lbf installation force required to install sinuous springs in conventional furniture assemblies.
In terms of distributed installation force along the rearward edge 94 of the textile deck assembly 36 that is imparted by the straps 98, various embodiments provide distributed installation forces, expressed in terms of force per lineal unit (e.g., lbf/in.), along the yoke member(s) 102 that is in a range of 4 lbf/in. to 9 lbf/in. inclusive; in some embodiments, the distributed installation force is in a range of 5 lbf/in. to 8 lbf/in. inclusive; in some embodiments, the distributed installation force is in a range of 6 lbf/in. to 7 lbf/in. inclusive. In one embodiment, the distributed installation tension force is nominally 6.5 lbf/in. to 6.75 lbf/in. Accordingly, based on the distributed installation tension force of 18 lbf/in. that is typical of conventional sinuous spring furniture assemblies, the distributed installation tension force of the disclosed embodiments are significantly reduced to a range that is within 20% to 50% of conventional sinuous spring assemblies.
While the pull tool 170 depicted herein is suitable for manual operation, the characteristics of the pull tool 170 and its operation are not limited to manual operation. That is, it is contemplated that the same components and characteristics described for the pull tool 170 may be incorporated into a machine for automated or semi-automated installation of the textile deck assembly 36 onto the seat frame assembly 32.
Because of the relative elasticity of the straps 98 and the platform portion 90, the straps 98 undergo a greater elongation than does the platform portion 90 when the textile deck assembly 36 is subject to a load. The cross-brace(s) 74 mitigates bowing of the front and back walls 42 and 44 toward each other due to the tension load placed on the textile deck assembly 36. Placement of the cross-brace(s) 74 proximate a lower plane of the seat frame assembly 32 allows for downward deflection of the textile deck assembly 36 during use. The forward and rearward gussets 86 and 88 effectively provide stiffening of the forward and rearward rails 82 and 84. The forward and rearward gussets 86 and 88, and the forward gusset 86 in particular, may also respectively mitigate twisting of the front and back walls 42 and 44 that may otherwise occur due to the vertically off-center placement of the cross-brace(s) 74 within the seat frame assembly 32. In an RTA furniture assembly 31 (
The guide strip(s) 108 make handling of the forward edge 92 of the platform portion 90 easier for the assembler, and provides ready alignment of the forward edge 92 along the forward rail 82.
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Functionally, the segmenting of the segmented rearward rail 201 enables the rearward rail segments 202a, 202b, and 202c to be included in the textile deck assembly 200 and still folded akin to the depiction of
Furthermore, the process of fabrication described attendant to
Referring to
In the depicted embodiment, each rearward mounting bracket 234 defines a mounting notch 240 having a vertical portion 242 and a horizontal portion 244 joined by a transition portion 246. The transition portion 246 may be bounded by at least one arcuate surface 248 (
Also in the depicted embodiment, the seat box 232 includes a metallic stretcher 260 having a forward end 262 and a rearward end 264. The metallic stretcher 260 includes many of the same components and attributes as described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/630,607 (the “'607 application”) to Hawkins et al., filed Jun. 22, 2016, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference herein except for express definitions and patent claims contained therein. As explained '607 application, the metallic seat stretcher 260 may be mounted to the seat box 232 with a single fastener at the forward end 262 and a single fastener at the rearward end 264.
Referring to
The end portions 203 of a given rearward rail segment 202 is oriented so that the length 274 of the cross-section 272 is substantially vertical and aligned over the vertical portion 242 of the mounting notch 240, with the rearward edge 212 of the rearward rail segment 202 with attached straps 98 are at the top of the cross-section 272 (
The results of the mounting of the rearward rail segment 202 to the rearward mounting brackets 234 is depicted in
Functionally, the width dimension 256 of the vertical portion 242 being greater than the height dimension 258 of the horizontal portion 244 enables the rearward rail segment 202 to turn the corner through the transition portion 246, while maintaining the narrower height dimension 258 for closer fit of the rearward rail segment 202 within the horizontal portion 244. The arcuate surface 248, when implemented, provides for smoother passage of the rearward rail segment 202 through the transition portion 246. By disposing the straps 98 behind the lower backrest rail 72, the straps 98 behind the at least one cushion 38, free of rubbing contact therewith that can cause wear on the cushions and also cause the cushions to creep forward.
Referring to
Referring to
In some embodiments, the proximal ends 316 of the hook portions 312, 314 and the cross portion 304 define a plane 328 that is perpendicular to the central plane 326 and, in assembly, lies substantially parallel to the fore-and-aft direction (i.e., substantially parallel to the x-axis of the Cartesian coordinate 89 of
Functionally, the gap 322 and opening 324 enables the strap clip 300 to be coupled to a strap 298 that is pre-formed to define a closed loop. The strap clip 300 can be manipulated so that the opening 324 and gap 322 is slid laterally over the rearward end 306 of the closed loop strap 298, then rotated into place with the cross portion 304 extending along the rearward end 306 of the closed loop strap 298. In some embodiments, the hook portions 312, 314 cooperate with the rearward rail 84 to define a clearance 330 between the rearward edge 212 of the rearward rail 84 and the 328 and the apex portion 321. The canted middle portion 320 also provides an additional spring loading of the closed loop strap 298 that may make up for length differences between the closed loop straps 298 and provide better compliance of the strap clip 300 in assembly. The lead-in structure 332 may assist installation personnel in placement of the strap clips 300, and enable the vertical clamping dimension 336 to be dimensioned for a tight fit over the rearward rail 84 without hindering the installation of the strap clips 300.
Referring to
In some embodiments, the gripping of the strap clip 300 includes engaging a tool 338 with the hook portion(s) 312, 314 of the strap clip 300, wherein the pulling of the strap clip 300 is performed with the tool 338. In some embodiments, disengagement of the tool 338 from the strap clip 300 includes moving the tool 338 in a direction substantially parallel to the rearward face 174 of the rearward rail 84, thereby removing the tool 338 from the gap 322 defined between the hook portion 312, 314 and the rearward face 174 of the rearward rail 84 (
Referring to
In the generalized schematic 340 of the depicted furniture assemblies 30, the forward edge 92 of the flexible sheet platform portion 342 is directly attached to the forward rail 82. In some embodiments, each of the opposing side edges 96 are directly attached to a respective one of the two opposed side walls 46 of the frame assembly 32. The rearward edge 94 of the flexible sheet platform portion 342 is coupled to the rearward rail 84 via the yoke member(s) 102 and the plurality of spring members 344, the plurality of spring members 344 extending rearward of the rearward edge 94. As described and depicted above, the yoke member(s) may be a rod, a bar, or a tubing. As described above, the forward edge 92 of the flexible sheet platform portion 342 is directly attached to the forward rail 82 with a plurality of fasteners 348, such as staples, nails, tacks, brads, or screws. In some embodiments, the fasteners 348 are spaced less than one inch apart along the forward edge 92.
The plurality of spring members 344 are spaced apart along the rearward edge 94 to define a center-to-center spacing 341 between adjacent ones of the plurality of spring members 344. The plurality of spring members 344 may be the elastic straps 98, or alternatively elastic cords or coil springs. In some embodiments, the center-to-center spacing 341 is in a range of 4 inches to 12 inches inclusive. Even though the spring members 344 apply tension forces at discrete points or intervals along the textile deck assembly 36, the yoke member(s) 102, 346 distribute the tension forces along the rearward edge 94, thus avoiding areas of increased stress concentrations and providing a substantially uniform firmness throughout the flexible sheet platform portion 342 or textile platform portion 90.
Referring to
Functionally, the yoke member acts to distribute tension loads imparted by the plurality of spring members 344 along the rearward edge 94 of the flexible sheet platform portion. The angled tie members 343 of adjacent spring members 344 act to oppose each other along the rearward edge 94 to maintain the strap or rope yoke member 102 in tension, to prevent or limit folding or distortion of the yoke member(s) 102. Providing rope or straps 346 of substantial thickness and width functions to spread the tension load over the rearward edge 94 of the flexible sheet platform portion 342 or textile platform portion 90.
Performance Testing
A series of tests were performed on a conventional sofa utilizing sinuous springs and on a test furniture assembly 30a (sofa) utilizing a test seat frame assembly 32a in accordance with embodiments of the disclosure. The test seat frame assembly 32a of the test furniture assembly 30a utilized test straps 98 folded once over the yoke members 102, having a nominal width (lateral dimension in
The results of various tests are presented and compared below to see how the test furniture assembly 30a with the test seat frame assembly 32a performs relative to the sofa having conventional decking with sinuous springs.
1. Deflection Testing Prior to Fatigue Testing
Referring to
For the deflection test reported herein, the platform of the weight stand 352 weighed approximately 40 lbf and the weight stack 350 weighed approximately 150 lbf, for a total of approximately 190 lbf. It is estimated that a person sitting on a sofa exerts about 70% of his or her weight on a seat box of a sofa, with about 20% being transferred to a back rest and about 10% transferred directly to the ground through the person's feet. Based on the 70% transferred to the seat box, the 190 lbf exerted by the weight stand 352 and weight stack 350 simulates the weight of an occupant weighing approximately 270 lbf.
While under the test load, the textile deck assembly 36 of the test furniture assembly 30a deflected downward 63 mm on average. The downward deflection of the conventional sofa was comparable but greater, at 66 mm.
2. Fatigue Testing
Referring to
The no-load elevations of the textile deck assembly 36 of the test furniture assembly 30a and the crown of the conventional sofa were measured after the fatigue testing and compared with pre-fatigue testing values to determine the permanent sag induced by the fatigue testing. The average permanent sag induced by the fatigue testing for the test furniture assembly 30a and the conventional sofa were comparable-3 mm and 2 mm, respectively.
3. Deflection Testing after Fatigue Testing
After the fatigue testing, the deflection test described above was repeated on both the test furniture assembly 30a and the conventional sofa. On average, the test furniture assembly 30a deflected downward 67 mm, or 4 mm more than for the pre-fatigue testing deflection. The conventional sofa averaged a downward deflection of 78 mm, of 8 mm more than for the pre-fatigue testing.
4. Drop Testing
Referring to
The no-load elevations of the textile deck assembly 36 of the test furniture assembly 30a and the crown of the conventional sofa were measured after the drop test and compared with pre-drop test values to determine the permanent sag induced by the drop testing. The average permanent sag induced by the drop testing for the test furniture assembly 30a was 4 mm. The average permanent sag induced by the drop testing for the conventional sofa was 18 mm—more than four times greater than the permanent sag experienced by the test furniture assembly 30a. That is, after the drop testing described, the permanent sag of the test furniture 30a was less than ¼ of the permanent sag of the conventional sofa.
5. Deflection Testing after Fatigue and Drop Testing
After the fatigue test and the drop test, the deflection test described above was repeated on both the test furniture assembly 30a and the conventional sofa. On average, the test furniture assembly 30a deflected downward 72 mm, or 9 mm more than for the pre-drop and pre-fatigue testing deflection. The conventional sofa averaged a downward deflection of 94 mm, or 28 mm more than for the pre-drop and pre-fatigue testing. That is, the downward deflection of the test furniture assembly 30a was less than ⅓ of the conventional sofa after the fatigue and drop testing.
6. Failure Testing
After completion of the tests above, additional drop tests on the test furniture assembly 30a, with the intention of causing structural failure. Additional drops of the weight W of 200 lbf weight were made on each of the three cushions 38a, 38b, and 38c from: the height H of six inches (five times); a height H of nine inches (five times); and a height H of 15 inches (10 times). The test seat frame assembly 32a remained intact through the additional drop test at the weight W of 200 lbf. Thereafter, 50 lbf of weight was added to the sand bag for a total weight W of 250 lbf and dropped 10 times from the 15 inch height on the left facing cushion 38a. Again, the test seat frame assembly 32a remained intact. The 250 lbf sand bag was then dropped three times from the 15 inch height onto the center cushion 38b. During the third drop, the back wall 44 of the seat frame assembly 32 was broken in two. The textile deck assembly 36 remained intact.
Based on previous testing, it is known that the conventional sofa decking utilizing the sinuous springs would experience 100% failure before or during the 200 lbf drop test from the nine inch height. Accordingly, the durability of the test furniture assembly 30a substantially exceeded both expectations and that of the conventional sofa.
While the disclosure is amenable to various modifications and alternative forms, specifics thereof have been shown by way of example in the drawings and described in detail. It is understood, however, that the intention is not to limit the application to the particular embodiments described. On the contrary, the intention is to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the disclosure as defined by the appended claims.
Persons of ordinary skill in the relevant arts will recognize that various embodiments can comprise fewer features than illustrated in any individual embodiment described above. The embodiments described herein are not meant to be an exhaustive presentation of the ways in which the various features may be combined. Accordingly, the embodiments are not mutually exclusive combinations of features; rather, the claims can comprise a combination of different individual features selected from different individual embodiments, as understood by persons of ordinary skill in the art.
References to “embodiment(s)”, “disclosure”, “present disclosure”, “embodiment(s) of the disclosure”, “disclosed embodiment(s)”, and the like contained herein refer to the specification (text, including the claims, and figures) of this patent application that are not admitted prior art.
For purposes of interpreting the claims, it is expressly intended that the provisions of 35 U.S.C. 112(f) are not to be invoked unless the specific terms “means for” or “step for” are recited in the respective claim.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 17/235,488, filed Apr. 20, 2021, now U.S. Pat. No. 11,523,690, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/345,222, filed Apr. 25, 2019, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,980,354, which is a National Phase entry of PCT Application No. PCT/US2017/058606, filed Oct. 26, 2017, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/413,141, filed Oct. 26, 2016, U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/543,148, filed Aug. 9, 2017, and U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/564,424, filed Sep. 28, 2017, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1554902 | Balikjian | Sep 1925 | A |
1622188 | Edwards | Mar 1927 | A |
1716176 | Vitez-Keresztfalvy | Jun 1929 | A |
3037766 | Berg | Jun 1962 | A |
3057613 | Benjamin | Oct 1962 | A |
3068493 | Farstrup | Dec 1962 | A |
3081077 | Sudman | Mar 1963 | A |
3115093 | Andrus | Dec 1963 | A |
3179469 | Heuston | Apr 1965 | A |
3333841 | Damiano | Aug 1967 | A |
3375861 | Marlow | Apr 1968 | A |
3497883 | Arnold et al. | Mar 1970 | A |
3498598 | Rathbun | Mar 1970 | A |
3502316 | Saether | Mar 1970 | A |
3667749 | Platt et al. | Jun 1972 | A |
3695706 | Basher et al. | Oct 1972 | A |
3700282 | Rowland | Oct 1972 | A |
3902756 | Chubb | Sep 1975 | A |
3913978 | Lester | Oct 1975 | A |
4285080 | Kitchen et al. | Aug 1981 | A |
4842257 | Abu-Isa | Jun 1989 | A |
4928334 | Kita | May 1990 | A |
5288136 | Webber et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5544943 | Durling | Aug 1996 | A |
5700060 | Bullard et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
6039404 | Fontana | Mar 2000 | A |
6116694 | Bullard | Sep 2000 | A |
6234578 | Barton et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6241317 | Wu | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6644752 | Takata | Nov 2003 | B2 |
D524565 | Franks | Jul 2006 | S |
7594701 | Kawabata et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7618572 | Coffield | Nov 2009 | B2 |
8136884 | Bullard et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8465007 | Coffield et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8550565 | Caldwell | Oct 2013 | B2 |
9004604 | Bogard | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9078524 | Bullard | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9247820 | Bullard | Feb 2016 | B2 |
10111528 | Mabon et al. | Oct 2018 | B1 |
20030001424 | Mundell et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20110035875 | Brandtner | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20120204392 | Luangphon | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20140375103 | Lejcher et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20170071354 | Mezzera | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170105545 | Lewis et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
6448899 | Jun 2000 | AU |
102625664 | Aug 2012 | CN |
102726979 | Oct 2012 | CN |
202820448 | Mar 2013 | CN |
103479122 | Jan 2014 | CN |
592130 | Sep 1947 | GB |
708394 | May 1954 | GB |
902211 | Aug 1962 | GB |
WO 2019199216 | Oct 2019 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20230114034 A1 | Apr 2023 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62564424 | Sep 2017 | US | |
62543148 | Aug 2017 | US | |
62413141 | Oct 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 17235488 | Apr 2021 | US |
Child | 18080151 | US | |
Parent | 16345222 | US | |
Child | 17235488 | US |