The invention relates to a physical therapy table useful primarily in the rehabilitation of patients with severe muscle weakness and the inability to support full body weight in standing.
Recent medical advances have allowed more patients to survive serious injuries or disease processes than ever before. Unfortunately, the period of bed rest required for recovery may lead to severe deterioration of muscle strength and the inability to support full body weight in standing. It is challenging for rehabilitation specialists to help these patients regain the ability to stand and begin ambulation. The challenge is especially great for obese patients. A common technique in current practice is to summon as many colleagues as practical to lift and maneuver the weakened patient to a standing position while he or she attempts to bear full weight through the lower extremities. This technique is not only dangerous, because of the risk of a fall, but it is also psychologically degrading for the patient as the activity reinforces the patient's dependence on others.
An alternative to mobilizing deconditioned patients with manpower is to use a tilt table. A tilt table resembles a stretcher having a top section that can be tilted gradually from a horizontal to a vertical position. The patient is transferred laterally from the hospital bed to the tilt table surface and secured to the table with straps placed across the knees and waist. The table's surface is then tilted to the desired inclination. A footboard at the lower end prevents the patient from sliding off the table and allows graded weight-bearing through the legs. The benefits of tilt table standing include a gradual retraining of the cardiovascular system to the demands of the body's upright position and the re-education of the balance mechanisms affected by long periods of bed rest.
Unfortunately, tilt tables have a significant limitation. The tilt table is only able to bring the patient to an upright position while simultaneously restricting movement of the lower extremities. This restriction prevents movement through the range-of-motion of the knee joints and greatly limits strengthening of the lower extremity musculature, because the legs are strapped to the table. The conventional tilt table design has no mechanism to enable a patient to perform lower or upper extremity exercise for strengthening or conditioning.
Exercise machines with a movable sled on inclined rails, which the user moves against the resistance of his body weight, are well known. Such devices are described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,383,684 of Schliep, U.S. Pat. No. 5,169,363 of Campanaro, U.S. Pat. No. 5,263,913 of Boren and U.S. Pat. No. 5,938,571 of Stevens. These pieces of equipment permit a user to exercise by using his legs or arms to move a moveable sled on which his body is supported on an inclined platform or set of rails. The inclination of the platform or rails on which the sled is moved may be changed to vary the resistance offered by the user's body weight. Such devices are designed for healthy users who are able access the apparatus from a standing position. In fact, the user must get on and off these devices in order to change the inclination or resistance level of the exercise device. Furthermore, these devices are made for simultaneous bilateral lower extremity exercise and may not be suitable for use by users that are unable to stand due to weakness or by users with one lower extremity that is non-weight bearing, such as a fractured or amputated leg.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,885,197 of Barton discloses an exercise apparatus with a stationary base on which is mounted a pivoting frame having a movable sled thereon. The apparatus includes a motor-drive for changing the angle of inclination of the pivoting frame. Although users are able to remain on the apparatus while the incline is changed, it is not safe for patients with severe deconditioning. Furthermore, there is no means of locking the sled in place while a user mounts the machine and no means of adjusting the sled travel. If a patient's knees were to buckle, the sled would slide down the rails and could injure the patient. In addition, a patient with severe weakness would be unable to keep his feet on the platform, as there is no means of supporting the legs or securing the feet to the platform. The carriage of the Barton patent, like that of the Boren patent, includes shoulder rests to allow a user to push the carriage up the inclined frame with his legs. These shoulder rests would prevent a lateral transfer of a user to the sled from a patient's bed. The only way to mount the device would be to sit on the carriage and slowly lower down between the rests. The Barton device also includes hand grips mounted on the guide rails for upper extremity workouts. However, since these grips are fixed in place, they would prevent a lateral transfer of a user onto the apparatus from a patient's bed.
Traction tables, in which a force is applied to effect spinal traction, are also well known. U.S. Pat. No. 3,741,200 of Morin describes a tilting table with multiple sections that can be locked and released so as to move with respect to each other on the table frame. By locking some sections together and permitting this joined subassembly to slide on the frame with respect to other sections, spinal traction may be produced on a patient on the table by the action of gravity. A traction device which does not include a tilting feature is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,024,214 of Hayes. Inversion tables, which invert to produce spinal traction, are described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,867,143 of Morin, U.S. Pat. No. 5,551,937 of Kwo and U.S. Pat. No. 5,967,956 of Teeter. Motorized versions of the traction table are described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,113,250 of Davis and U.S. Pat. No. 4,672,697 of Schürch. These tables are designed to treat back and neck ailments by inverting a patient who is secured to a platform to a head-down position. Such tables would not be used for the treatment of muscular weakness and would be unsafe to use on the population of patients with severe deconditioning. Tilting such patients to a head-down position could lead to respiratory distress, increased blood pressure and increased intracranial pressure, all of which are potentially harmful to the patients.
Lastly, with exception of the traditional tilt table, all of the other devices described above are not designed for easy transportability, especially for movement into and out of hospital rooms and intensive care units. It would be desirable if a table was mobile to allow transport to hospital rooms and could function as a tilt table and an exercise apparatus. It would also be desirable for the table to accommodate patients with a non-weight bearing restriction such as a fractured or amputated leg and for the head of the patient supporting carriage to elevate allowing improved respiration for patients.
Among the advantages of the invention is that it functions both as a passive tilt table and as a strengthening apparatus for patients with severe muscle weakness and/or the inability to stand without assistance. Another advantage of the invention is that it uses resistance against the patient's body weight to increase strength, range of motion, and conditioning for deconditioned patients. Still another advantage of a preferred embodiment of the invention is that it facilitates upper extremity exercise. Yet another advantage of a preferred embodiment of the invention is that it facilitates easy transfer of a patient to and from a hospital bed.
Additional advantages of this invention will become apparent from an examination of the drawings and the ensuing description.
The invention comprises a therapeutic exercise device which includes a base and a support frame that is pivotally mounted on the base, said support frame having a lower end and an upper end. A carriage is mounted for sliding movement along at least a portion of the support frame, said carriage comprising a lower section and an upper section that is pivotally attached to the lower section. The device also includes a left foot rest and a right foot rest, each of which is independently pivotally attached to the lower end of the support frame, and a body-restraining belt that is adapted to secure the body of a patient to the carriage.
In order to facilitate an understanding of the invention, the preferred embodiments of the invention are illustrated in the drawings, and a detailed description thereof follows. It is not intended, however, that the invention be limited to the particular embodiments described or to use in connection with the apparatus illustrated herein. Various modifications and alternative embodiments such as would ordinarily occur to one skilled in the art to which the invention relates are also contemplated and included within the scope of the invention described and claimed herein.
The presently preferred embodiments of the invention are illustrated in the accompanying drawings, in which like reference numerals represent like parts throughout, and in which:
As used herein, the term “deconditioned” and similar terms refer to a condition of a person who, due to injury, disease or other circumstance, is in a weakened state. Such persons may suffer from lower extremity paralysis or an altered mental state, and may be unable to support their body weight in a standing position.
As shown in
Carriage 44 preferably includes four friction-free bearing wheels 60 (shown in
In a preferred embodiment of the invention, center section 68 is employed to provide a flat table surface when the device is used as a tilt table (see
It is preferred that the center section be sized and arranged so that when it is secured to the support frame, the carriage is prevented from sliding thereon. A second body-restraining belt such as knee strap 72 (see
Adjustable foot rests 54 and 56, located at the lower end of the support frame, can be positioned in an angled position with respect to the plane of the support frame by adjusting a spring lock 73 (best shown in
It is also within the scope of this invention for the foot rests to have a force measuring mechanism such as a conventional load cell (not shown) mounted therein. Preferably, the foot rests will also be provided with a built-in digital displays 84 that are electrically attached to the load cells to display the amount of force applied to each foot rest (and thereby show the amount of his weight that the patient is supporting with his feet). This feature allows therapists to objectively measure the patient's daily progress. The force measuring mechanisms may also be used to re-educate the patient to distribute weight equally through both legs while standing.
In a preferred embodiment of the invention, a range of motion (ROM) stop 86 is adapted to be adjustably mounted on one side of the support frame so as to limit the sliding motion of the carriage at a plurality of locations on the support frame. Preferably, ROM stop 86 is adapted to slide along the support frame and is provided with a locking bolt 88 that can be turned down to lock the stop on the support frame at a desired location when the device is in the exercise mode. As shown in
In a preferred embodiment of the invention, handles 96, located on either side of the support frame, are attached to a grooved locking assembly 98 (shown in
As shown in
Wheels 36 of base 32 allow the device to be transported to a patient's hospital room. Preferably, wheels 36 are provided with conventional locking devices such as wheel locks 120 (shown in
A cord holder 140, as well as a control holder 142 (on which hanger 144 of controller may be placed), are located on the base for storage. It is also within the scope of this invention for the electrical system to be replaced with a rechargeable battery system. Such an improvement would eliminate the need to find an electrical outlet in the hospital room.
As shown in
As has been described herein, device 30 employs a single lift and tilt mechanism 121 that is adapted to pivot the support frame on the base, and to pivot the upper section of the carriage with respect to the lower section.
Carriage 168 of the embodiment of
Preferred embodiment 30 of the invention may be used for exercise by first placing switch 136 in the “exercise” mode. In this mode, center section 68 should be removed from the support frame and carriage 44 should be locked to the support frame. Wheels 36 on the base allow a therapist to move the device next to a patient's bed and the lift mechanism allows the therapist to match the height of the device with the patient's bed. Preferably, the wheels can then be locked in place and the patient transferred onto the device while in a supine position using a sheet. The patient may be secured to the locked carriage with a safety strap across his waist. The upper section of the carriage may be raised to enhance respiration and the patient's feet secured to the foot rests. After the patient is secured, the carriage may be unlocked from the support frame and the support frame gradually tilted to an incline at which the patient is able to perform a shallow, controlled squat by flexing his knees and extending back up to a “standing” position (see
A range-of-motion (ROM) stop limits the amount of carriage travel or squat depth. When positioned at a higher position on the support frame, the carriage is limited to travel a short distance allowing the patient to perform a shallow squat exercise. Positioning the ROM stop lower on the support frame allows greater knee flexion for a more intense exercise. The ROM stop serves as a safety mechanism by preventing the patient from sliding down the device if his knees were to buckle. When the patient requires a rest break, the therapist locks the carriage back in place and lowers the incline of the support frame. The ROM stop may also function as a feedback system by producing an auditory chime when the carriage wheels contact a sensor on the stop. This indicates that the patient has performed a successful repetition.
The amount of force the patient must exert to fully extend his legs from the squat position is dependent on the incline of the support frame. For example, a 20-degree tilt corresponds to approximately 40% of the patient's weight and a 30-degree tilt corresponds to approximately 70% of the patient's body weight. This ability to change resistance levels allows therapists to adjust the exercise intensity to a patient's tolerance while the patient remains on the exercise device. This type of weight-bearing exercise is ideal during the acute stage of recovery because it simulates the sit-to-stand activity while bearing only a portion of the patient's body weight in a controlled and secure environment. The tilt of the support frame can be gradually increased daily until the patient's leg strength is strong enough to perform the exercise with a substantial percentage of his body weight such as 60% of his weight (corresponding to a 25° incline). When the device is in the “exercise” mode, the tilting mechanism will preferably only allow inclination of up to 25°. Standing from a chair or bed can then be initiated safely with less assistance from the therapist, as the patient has progressively strengthened the muscles responsible for performing the task of standing.
The preferred device may also be used for upper extremity exercise. Adjustable hand grips are located on either sides of the carriage to allow a patient to participate in upper extremity exercise while exercising his legs. These grips are also used to allow a patient to increase his knee flexion by pulling with his arms and gradually stretching the knee joint during the squat exercise. The bars can be adjusted by sliding up or down to accommodate the patient's height. Another important feature of the grips is that they can be removed. This allows therapists to transfer the patient laterally onto the device from a bed without coming into contact with the grips. Finally, the grips are curved to facilitate normal upper extremity movement by allowing the elbow to move laterally during exercise. The disadvantage of conventional or straight grip bars is that they force the elbows to move downwards and contact the carriage. The curved grips allow the elbows to move laterally in a normal fashion without engaging the carriage.
Still another use for the device is to allow a patient to participate in unilateral leg strengthening exercise. The device can be used for patients with a weight-bearing restriction on one leg. An upper leg support may be installed on either side of the carriage's lower edge, supporting the involved lower extremity. The foot rests are individually pivotally mounted on the frame so that by releasing the foot rest on the involved side, a patient is able to perform the lower extremity squatting exercise exclusively with the uninvolved leg without the affected leg coming in contact with a foot rest. The device may be used daily until the patient is ready to progress to standing from the bed with assistive device such as a walker (see
The device may also be used by patients with bilateral leg involvement to participate in exclusive upper extremity workouts. Two upper leg supports are installed as shown in
Although this description contains many specifics, these should not be construed as limiting the scope of the invention but as merely providing illustrations of some of the presently preferred embodiments thereof, as well as the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out the invention. The invention, as described herein, is susceptible to various modifications and adaptations, and the same are intended to be comprehended within the meaning and range of equivalents of the appended claims.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/422,016 which was filed on Oct. 29, 2002.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
238799 | Morgan | Mar 1881 | A |
1018757 | Grady | Feb 1912 | A |
1735569 | Emery | Nov 1929 | A |
2598204 | Allen | May 1952 | A |
2768622 | Sanders | Oct 1956 | A |
3527202 | Donzelle | Sep 1970 | A |
3589358 | Megal | Jun 1971 | A |
3741200 | Morin | Jun 1973 | A |
3759252 | Berman | Sep 1973 | A |
3821953 | Mikan | Jul 1974 | A |
4113250 | Davis | Sep 1978 | A |
4378791 | Sarrell | Apr 1983 | A |
4383684 | Schliep | May 1983 | A |
4444178 | Kuo | Apr 1984 | A |
4638793 | Therkorn | Jan 1987 | A |
4672697 | Schurch | Jun 1987 | A |
4825852 | Genovese et al. | May 1989 | A |
4867143 | Morin | Sep 1989 | A |
4890604 | Nelson | Jan 1990 | A |
4913424 | Pepin | Apr 1990 | A |
4995378 | Dyer et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5024214 | Hayes | Jun 1991 | A |
5125884 | Weber et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5169363 | Campanaro et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5263913 | Boren | Nov 1993 | A |
5402544 | Crawford et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5413543 | Drago | May 1995 | A |
5551937 | Kwo | Sep 1996 | A |
5601519 | Comereski | Feb 1997 | A |
5810698 | Hullett et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5885197 | Barton | Mar 1999 | A |
5938571 | Stevens | Aug 1999 | A |
5940911 | Wang | Aug 1999 | A |
5967956 | Teeter | Oct 1999 | A |
6243897 | Sumiya | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6446287 | Borders | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6464296 | Sumner | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6645130 | Webber | Nov 2003 | B2 |
7181793 | Lee | Feb 2007 | B2 |
20040043876 | Craciunescu | Mar 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060293156 A1 | Dec 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60422016 | Oct 2002 | US |