The present invention relates to configurable imaging systems having a plurality of display units for generating respective portions of a composite image, and more particularly to a thermal actuator for use with a display unit of a configurable imaging system to minimize mechanical stress resulting from thermal expansion.
A large number of applications and potential applications exist for imaging systems such as projection displays that are used to display information. Such applications include, but are not limited to, general indoor signage (e.g. shopping malls, arcades, etc.), transportation signage (e.g. arrival/departure times, etc.), in-lobby signage for office buildings, control rooms, restaurants signage, etc.
It is known to provide large displays for signage and the like by assembling a multiplicity of individual display units in an array (see, for example, United States Patent Publication No. 2008/0284675, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference). The construction of each individual display unit may include a chassis for housing projection lamps, electronic circuits, etc., and a rear projection screen. Typically, the chassis is metallic whereas the rear projection screen is plastic; resulting in a mismatch of thermal expansion coefficients (i.e. the screen expands at a faster rate than the chassis). Therefore, in order to build an array of display units capable of operation over a wide range of environmental temperatures, the thermal expansion coefficient mismatch must be accounted for.
One method of accounting for thermal expansion is to undersize the screen so that at elevated temperatures the screen does not exceed the chassis size and cause interference with a neighbouring display unit. However, this solution is not desirable since it results in large gaps between adjacent display unit screens at nominal temperatures, in order to accommodate thermal expansion at elevated temperatures. Large gaps between adjacent screens have the potential to interfere with the optical transition from one display to the next, thereby reducing overall image quality. Another, less optimal alternative is to allow minor interference collisions within predetermine tolerance limits that do not cause damage to either the screen or chassis. However, it is difficult to manufacture display units with sufficiently high tolerance limits as to avoid damage caused by interference between adjacent units at elevated temperatures and gaps between units at nominal temperatures.
Yet another solution is to fabricate the chassis and display screen from the same material so that the chassis and screen exhibit similar thermal expansion characteristics. To achieve this, the chassis may be constructed of plastic having a comparable coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) to the screen assembly. As the screen expands, so too does the chassis, thereby maintaining the expansion differential to a minimum. Unfortunately, a plastic chassis has potentially poor performance with respect to dimensional stability, particularly as it relates to component positioning. For example, a plastic chassis may twist and distort as it expands and contracts, resulting in misalignment of the optical components.
Embodiments will now be described, by way of example only, with reference to the attached Figures, wherein:
A skilled person in the art will understand that the drawings are for illustrative purposes only. The drawings are not intended to limit the scope of the applicant's teachings in any way.
In
In order to provide dimensional stability, the chassis 24 of each display unit 20 is configured to generally comprise a rigid frame, whereas the screen 22 is preferably made from a plastic material, such as Polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA), Styrene Methyl Methacrylate Acrylic copolymer (SMMA), glass, acrylic, polycarbonate, Polyethylene terephthalate (PET), or any suitable clear or mostly clear plastic. The rigid frame may also be configured to permit mounting of the display unit 20 to a supporting structure, such as a wall. Non-limiting examples of suitable materials for the chassis include aluminum, magnesium, and glass-filled nylon.
Within the chassis 24 of each display unit 20 are a plurality of electronic and optical components (not shown) for displaying images on the screen 22. According to an exemplary embodiment, the electronic and optical components may include a small rear projector, including a light source, light valve, optics and associated electronics. The light source may, for example, be implemented using LEDs, although it is contemplated that lasers or other light sources may be utilized, the selection and implementation of which would be known to a person of ordinary skill in the art. The chassis 24 may also contain a light engine and associated circuitry (including, for example, a microprocessor, RAM frame buffer, and video processing to provide image capture, resizing, color matching, edge blending, etc). It will be appreciated that the various electronic and optical components generate heat within the unit 20.
As discussed above, each unit 20 projects a portion of a composite image (preferably at SVGA resolution to enable small pixel pitch (under 1 mm)). For example, United States Patent Publication No. 2008/0284675 discloses fully configurable display units (i.e. they are not required to be arranged in rectangular configurations), resulting in significant flexibility in terms of display design.
Regardless of the arrangement, coupling mechanisms permit physical registration or alignment of each display unit 20 with each vertically and/or horizontally adjacent display unit 20, for example via matching protrusions and indentations on respective surfaces of each display unit chassis 24.
As discussed above, where the screen materials (generally comprising the screen, lenticular, diffusion layers, Fresnel, etc.) exhibit thermal expansion characteristics that differ (e.g. exceed) from that of the chassis, an expansion differential can result. Changes in temperature can arise from a number of sources, including, but not limited to operation of the display unit, and changes in the ambient temperature in which the display unit is located. To account for this thermal expansion, it is known to provide a nominal gap between adjacent screens 22 in order to avoid potentially damaging screen compression or collision. While such a gap may be sized large enough to permit for thermal changes in screen size, it will be appreciated that a large gap between adjacent screens may interfere with the optical transition from one display unit 20 to the next, thereby reducing overall image quality.
Table 1 provides an exemplary set of thermal expansion characteristics of a rigid chassis compared to a screen.
While both the chassis and screen are dimensioned with a nominal width of 408 mm, the actual width of each component at operating temperature (e.g. 40° C. higher) differs as the CTE of the chassis is lower than the CTE of the screen. As shown, the screen expands to a total width of 409.09 mm, while the chassis expands to a total width of 408.42, representing a 0.67 mm difference. In this scenario, because the screen expands to a greater extent than the chassis, significant gaps between adjacent screens would be required to avoid potentially damaging compression/collision.
Therefore, in accordance with the embodiment of
According to the embodiment shown in
A person of skill in the art will appreciate that any of a plurality of thermal actuators may be used. In one embodiment, a mechanical actuator 26 is provided wherein the linear translation element is a piston 28 adapted to be pushed by the thermal expansion of a fluid, such as wax, from an expansion conduit of a reservoir 30 (i.e. the stationary component connected to the chassis 24), as shown in
While generally described within the framework of ‘multi-tiled’ displays, the thermal actuator set forth herein can be suitably applied to other imaging units, such as multiple displays in a control room.
It will be appreciated that, although embodiments have been described and illustrated in detail, various modifications and changes may be made. While several embodiments are described above, some of the features described above can be modified, replaced or even omitted. All such alternatives and modifications are believed to be within the scope of the invention and are covered by the claims appended hereto.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2696086 | Jones | Dec 1954 | A |
4340172 | Poore | Jul 1982 | A |
4974073 | Inova | Nov 1990 | A |
5136390 | Inova et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5346130 | Rademaker | Sep 1994 | A |
5767818 | Nishida | Jun 1998 | A |
6012420 | Dykstra et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6081375 | Furuya et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6115022 | Mayer, III et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6219011 | Aloni et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6335829 | Van De Voorde | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6501441 | Ludtke et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6550521 | McNabb | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6736326 | Hunka | May 2004 | B2 |
6741222 | Tucker | May 2004 | B1 |
6760075 | Mayer, III et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6771307 | Waki et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6791513 | Ogino et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6799836 | Silverbrook | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6857577 | Hunka | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6956541 | McClintok | Oct 2005 | B2 |
7157838 | Thielemans et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7248229 | Zerphy et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7742120 | Bayley et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7806345 | Tsunekawa et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7918565 | Hemphill et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8240857 | Hemphill et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
20010026326 | Itaki et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20050018040 | Buchner et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050219467 | Nomizo et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
4006189 | Sep 1991 | DE |
04361248 | Dec 1992 | JP |
08-088820 | Apr 1996 | JP |
09292144 | Nov 1997 | JP |
2000-276099 | Oct 2000 | JP |
2002-162689 | Jun 2002 | JP |
9913377 | Mar 1999 | WO |
9929117 | Jun 1999 | WO |
00-18138 | Mar 2000 | WO |
00-18139 | Mar 2000 | WO |
2006-115852 | Nov 2006 | WO |
Entry |
---|
European Search Report mailed Oct. 26, 2009 in related European Patent Application 09009079.6. |
Ezekiel S. Bhasker et al: “Asynchronous Distributed Calibration for Scalable and Reconfigurable Multi-Projector Displays” IEEE Transactions on Visualizationa nd Computer Graphics, IEE Service Center, Los Alamitos, CA, US, vol. 12, No. 5, Sep. 1, 2006, pp. 1101-1108, XP011150906, ISSN 1077-2626. |
European Search Report mailed Oct. 29, 2008 in related European Patent Application No. 08251680.8. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110279352 A1 | Nov 2011 | US |