The present disclosure relates generally to an apparatus for thermal cycling. Certain embodiments relate more specifically to a method of manufacturing an apparatus and a method of using the apparatus.
The written disclosure herein describes illustrative embodiments that are non-limiting and non-exhaustive. Reference is made to certain of such illustrative embodiments that are depicted in the figures, in which:
More detail regarding the plurality of wells 120 of well block 110 can be seen in
The layers of adhesive 150 and 170 may be the same material. The adhesive is ductile and flexible, has relatively high thermal conductivity and low viscosity. Illustratively, the adhesive enhances the uniformity of heat transfer between peltier 160 and wells 120. In one embodiment, the adhesive permits apparatus 100 to be assembled without the use of conventional clamps used to clamp a well block to a heat sink. When an adhesive is used in an embodiments such as apparatus 100, the adhesive is capable of retaining the peltier device 160 adjacent to the structure contacted by the adhesive such as the wells 120 of well block 110 and/or heat sink 180 even when apparatus 100 is turned upside down without clamping well block 110 to heat sink 180.
Various embodiments of a suitable adhesive are capable of cycling between a temperature at least as high as 95° C. and at least as low as 60° C. at least about 5,000 times, at least about 10,000 times, at least about 100,000 times, or at least about 200,000 times and still be capable of retaining peltier device 160. Various embodiments of a suitable adhesive may have an elongation, as defined below in the Examples, of at least about 15%, 20%, 22%, 35%, 40%, 50%, 55%, 60%, 70%, 90%, 110%, 120%, 180%, 200%, 400% or ranges within combinations of these values such as about 15% to about 1,000%, about 35% to about 700%, about 70% to about 500%, or between 100% to about 200%.
Suitable adhesives may also have an unprimed adhesion lap shear of between about 1 kgf/cm2 and about 75 kgf/cm2, over about 10 kgf/cm2, between about 10 kgf/cm2 and about 45 kgf/cm2. The viscosity of the adhesive may range between about 1,000 centipoise and about 200,000 centipoise, between about 10,000 centipoise and about 150,000 centipoise, between about 20,000 centipoise and about 80,000 centipoise, or between about 30,000 centipoise and about 40,000 centipoise.
Various embodiments may also have a thermal conductivity, as defined below in the Examples, of at least about 0.39, 0.40, 0.74, 0.77, 0.84, 0.85, 0.9, 0.92, 0.95, 1.1, 1.4, 1.53, 1.8, 1.9, 1.97, 2.2, 2.5 or ranges within combinations of these values such as about 0.74 to about 2.5 or about 0.9 to about 1.8. In one embodiment, the adhesive has a thermal conductivity at 25° C./77° F. of between about 0.7 Watt/meter-K and about 2.5 Watt/meter-K. In another embodiment, the adhesive has a thermal conductivity at 25° C./77° F. of between about 0.8 Watt/meter-K and about 2.0 Watt/meter-K. In one embodiment, the adhesive has a thermal conductivity at 25° C./77° F. of between about 0.9 Watt/meter-K and about 1.5 Watt/meter-K. In yet another embodiment, the adhesive has a thermal conductivity at 25° C./77° F. of over about 1.0 Watt/meter-K. In a further embodiment, the polymer has a thermal conductivity at 25° C./77° F. of about 1.1 Watt/meter-K.
Examples of suitable adhesives include thermally conductive silicone pastes, which are non-curing. Specific trade names of suitable thermally conductive silicone pastes, which are non-curing, are provided by those listed in the Examples.
The embodiment depicted in
More detailed information about the configuration of well 120 can be appreciated with reference to
An advantage of flat bottom 128 relative to prior art configurations is that the shape can be manufactured with greater uniformity, and provides additional surface area that enables heat to be transferred with greater uniformity and at a more rapid rate. However, it is understood that flat bottom 128 may have rounded edges near sidewall 126 or otherwise may not be completely flat from one side of cylindrical sidewall 126 to the other. Moreover, because lower cylindrical sidewall 126 does not interfere with insertion of the sample well 82 into well 120, the shape of the well 120 allows sample well 82 to have maximal contact with the sidewall 122 of the wells in each well block.
An average well 120′ of well block 110′, as shown in
As shown in
The system includes a computing device 104, which may comprise one or more processors, memories, computer-readable media, one or more HMI devices 103 (e.g., input-output devices, displays, printers, and the like), one or more communications interfaces (e.g., network interfaces, Universal Serial Bus (USB) interfaces, etc.), and the like. Computing device 104 may be provided within housing 101, or may be provided separately, such as a laptop or desktop computer, or portions of computing device 104 may be resident within housing 101, while other portions are located separately and may be coupled through wiring or wirelessly. Computing device 104 may be configured to load computer-readable program code for controlling thermal cycler apparatus 100 and optics block 109. In one illustrative embodiment, thermal cycler apparatus 100 in housing 101 may be provided in an automated system with a robotics unit 105. The robotics unit 105 may be programmed to load the samples into sample wells 82 and then load sample plate 80 into housing 101 through opening 102. Optionally, robotics unit 105 may also prepare the samples prior to loading into sample wells 82. Teach points may be used by robotics unit 105 for orienting plate 80 into well block 110. Teach points 134a-c are best seen in
Examples of an Adhesive.
An exemplary method for determining the tensile strength and elongation of elastomeric materials is described below. This method is not ASTM D412 but is based closely thereon. For this exemplary method, the apparatus may be the following, although similar equipment may be used provided it is capable of the accuracy and precision required. The dies used may be the ASTM D412 die C or others as specified, from any suitable source. The marker used may be a bench marker with two parallel lines 1+/−0.003 in. (2.54+/−0.0076 cm) apart for dies C and D and 2+/−0.003 in. (5.08/+/−0.0076 cm) for A, B, E and F, from any suitable source of commercial rubber stamp pads. The micrometer used should be capable to +/−0.001 in. (0.02 mm) and exert a total force of no more than 1.5 psi (10 kpa), from any suitable source. The molds used may be aluminum and may prepare samples at least 4 in.×4 in. (10.2 cm×10.2 cm) and between 0.06 in and 0.12 in. (0.15 cm and 0.30 cm) thick, as specified, from any suitable source. The press may be any small hand operated press suitable for cutting the test bars. Examples of such presses include tensile testers from Monsanto Instruments, Akron, Ohio; Instron Corp., Canton, Mass.; or United Testing Systems, Auburn Heights, Mich.
It is noted, and a skilled artisan would be aware, that the results may be adversely affected by improper care of the dies. The edges should be sharp and protected at all times from nicks.
A standard test slab (0.080+/−0.008 inches thick, 2.0+/−0.2 mm) of the material to be tested was molded and cured as specified. The slab was allowed to rest at room temperature on a flat surface for at least 3 h. The room in which the testing was performed was maintained at 23+/−2° C. Using the ASTM D412 Disc or other specified die and a press, three bars (or the specified number of test bars) were cut parallel with the grain, if any, of the material.
It is noted that straight samples may be pulled if enough material is not available to cut the normal test bars; however, the width must be measured. In these instances, A=W/[(D) (L)] where A is the area in cm2; W is the weight in air in g; D is the density in g/cm3; and L is the length in cm. Similarly, pieces of tubing too small to cut suitable bars from may be pulled, if the area is calculated. For tubing with OD ⅜ in. (0.95 cm) or less, this may be approximated. In other instances, A=(CSA,1)−(CSA,2); where CSA,1 is the area using outside diameter and CSA,2 is the area using inside diameter.
The thickness {to 0.001 in. (0.02 mm)} of each test bar was measured in three places from end to end of the reduced section. The median of the three measurements was recorded as “Th”. If the measurements varied by more than 0.003 in. (0.07 mm), the bar was discarded. For instances where tension set is required, each of the test bars was marked with a 1 in. (2.54 cm), “L,o” bench mark that was equidistant from the center line of the reduced section and perpendicular to its longitudinal axis. It is noted that whenever samples were heat aged or stored prior to testing, they are marked for identification by notching the ends rather than with an ink mark if there is the possibility of the ink affecting the samples.
The test bar was placed in the grips of the tester and adjusted so the tension was uniformly distributed over the cross section of the bar during the test. The machine was started, the bar was stretched to the breaking point and the necessary data to complete the calculations as specified was recorded. It is noted that the instrument may be equipped with a mechanical or electrical measuring system and may have a manual or automatic recording system. The calculations may be performed by a computer attached to the test instrument.
In this exemplary method, the rupture points of the bars should be observed as an indication of problem with the dies. Thus, if all samples break in the same area, a die problem may exist. If this occurred, the test was repeated with the remaining test bars. The required result was calculated and the median values were reported unless another reporting mode is specified. If specified, other reporting modes or values may be reported, e.g. average, weighted average, lowest value, highest value.
The median value of three bars was used unless either one or more of the values did not meet the specified requirements when testing for compliance with a specification, or the sample was a referee or round robin material. In these instances, a total of five bars were pulled and the median value reported.
If there was any indication that the results were invalid, the total test was repeated. Examples of such indications are minimum and maximum values+/−15% from the median; constant rupture point on all bars (i.e. a damaged die); nicks in the edges of the bars due to poor cutting techniques or damaged dies; and air bubbles, flow marks, etc., which might indicate poor sample preparation.
If tension set is required, the two pieces were allowed to rest 10 min, then carefully fit together to give full contact at the point of the break. The distance between the bench marks was measured and recorded as “L,2”.
In this exemplary method, the tensile tester, bench marker, and micrometer were on a routine calibration schedule.
The following definitions are applied to terms used in this method.
Elongation is the extension of a test bar to rupture expressed as a percentage of the original length and measured by the bench marks. It is also known as ultimate elongation or elongation at break. The term may also be used to describe a specific percentage extension when used with modulus or tension set (i.e. modulus at 200% elongation). Elongation, 5 is calculated as [{(L,1)−(L,o)} (100)]/(L,o) where L,1 is the length at break between bench marks and I,o is the original length between bench marks. With an elongation gage and a 1 in. (2.54 cm) bench mark spacing, the percentage elongation may be read directly as E, %.
Modulus is the applied force per unit of original cross sectional area of a test bar at a specific percentage elongation (i.e. tensile stress at a given elongation). This term is normally accompanied with a specified percentage elongation and is generally written “Modulus, 200.” Modulus is calculated as [(F) (Factor)]/[(W) (Th)]=psi #, where F is the force applied or the dial reading at E; Factor is instrumental factors required to convert the dial reading into pounds of force; W is width of the reduced section before pulling {0.250 in. (0.635 cm) for die C}; “Th” median thickness of the reduced section before pulling, E is specified percentage elongation, and # KPa is psi×6.8948.
Tensile strength is the maximum tensile stress applied during the rupture of a test bar. Tensile strength is calculated as [(F) (Factor)]/[(W) (Th)]=psi #, where all symbols are as defined as above except F; F is the maximum force applied to break the sample.
Tensile stress is the applied force per unit of original cross sectional area of a test bar.
Tension set after break is the set (extension) remaining after a test bar has been stretched to rupture and allowed to retract for 10 min, expressed as a percentage of the original length of the bench mark. This is not to be confused with tension set. Tension set after break is calculated as Set, %=[{(L,2)=(L,o)} (100)]/(L,o), where L,o is the original length between bench mark and L,2 is the length between bench marks after 10 min rest after break.
Tension set is the set (extension) remaining after a test bar has been stretched to a given percentage elongation and allowed to retract, expressed as a percentage of the original length of the bench mark. The value is obtained as follows: the bar is placed in the grips. The grips are spread at 20 in./min (50.8+/−2.5 cm/min) to the specified percentage elongation. The machine is secured and the sample is allowed to remain under tension for a specified time. The sample is released quickly but without snap and the bar is removed. The bar is allowed to rest flat for a specified time and the distance between the bench marks to 1% of the original length is measured. Calculate as for tension set after break. The result is generally reported with the percentage elongation, such as “tension set, 200.”
The precision of the various results should be within +/−15% to ensure repeatability, reproducibility, and accuracy.
The thermally conductive compounds listed in Table 1, below, are available from DOW CORNING, and were all tested using the exemplary method described previously. Relevant data is shown.
The compound AS 1808, available from ACC SILICONES (Somerset, UK), was tested using a method comparable to the exemplary method described previously. Its thermal conductivity at 25° C./77° F. (Watt/meter-K), Elongation (%), and Overlap Shear Strength Aluminum (kg/cm2) are 1.79, 91, and 12.31, respectively.
It will be understood that reference to PCR is illustrative only and the devices of this disclosure may be compatible with other methods of amplification. Such suitable procedures include strand displacement amplification (SDA); nucleic acid sequence-based amplification (NASBA); cascade rolling circle amplification (CRCA), Q beta replicase mediated amplification; isothermal and chimeric primer-initiated amplification of nucleic acids (ICAN); transcription-mediated amplification (TMA), and the like. Asymmetric PCR may also be used. Therefore, when the term PCR is used herein, it should be understood to include variations on PCR as well as other alternative amplification methods, as well as post-PCR processing, such as melt curve analysis. Illustrative examples of suitable melt curve analysis can be found in U.S. Pat. No. 7,387,887, which is incorporated herein by reference. Furthermore, the devices of this disclosure may be suitable for a variety of other biological and non-biological reactions that require temperature control.
It will be understood by those having skill in the art that changes may be made to the details of the above-described embodiments without departing from the underlying principles presented herein. For example, any suitable combination of various embodiments, or the features thereof, is contemplated.
Any methods disclosed herein comprise one or more steps or actions for performing the described method. The method steps and/or actions may be interchanged with one another. In other words, unless a specific order of steps or actions is required for proper operation of the embodiment, the order and/or use of specific steps and/or actions may be modified.
Throughout this specification, any reference to “one embodiment,” “an embodiment,” or “the embodiment” means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with that embodiment is included in at least one embodiment. Thus, the quoted phrases, or variations thereof, as recited throughout this specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment.
Similarly, it should be appreciated that in the above description of embodiments, various features are sometimes grouped together in a single embodiment, figure, or description thereof for the purpose of streamlining the disclosure. This method of disclosure, however, is not to be interpreted as reflecting an intention that any claim require more features than those expressly recited in that claim. Rather, inventive aspects lie in a combination of fewer than all features of any single foregoing disclosed embodiment. It will be apparent to those having skill in the art that changes may be made to the details of the above-described embodiments without departing from the underlying principles set forth herein.
The claims following this Detailed Description are hereby expressly incorporated into this Detailed Description, with each claim standing on its own as a separate embodiment. This disclosure includes all permutations of the independent claims with their dependent claims. Recitation in the claims of the term “first” with respect to a feature or element does not necessarily imply the existence of a second or additional such feature or element. Embodiments of the invention in which an exclusive property or privilege is claimed are defined as follows.
This application claims the benefit of and priority to PCT Application Serial No. PCT/US2011/063005, filed 2 Dec. 2011, entitled “THERMAL CYCLER APPARATUS AND RELATED METHODS”, which also claims the benefit of and priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/419,680, entitled “THERMAL CYCLER APPARATUS AND RELATED METHODS”, filed 3 Dec. 2010 with inventors Zackery Kent Evans, Thomas Knight Bodily, Richard David Abbott and Patrick L. Riley, the entirety of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2011/063005 | 12/2/2011 | WO | 00 | 7/9/2013 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2012/075360 | 6/7/2012 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6197572 | Schneebeli | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6337435 | Chu et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
7387887 | Wittwer et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
20030008308 | Enzelberger et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20060094108 | Yoder et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060286659 | Atwood et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20080138887 | Atwood et al. | Jun 2008 | A2 |
20090130719 | Handique | May 2009 | A1 |
20090263782 | Ward et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100081191 | Woods | Apr 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2842313 | Nov 2006 | CN |
101194021 | Jun 2008 | CN |
2001241761 | Sep 2001 | JP |
2002010775 | Jan 2002 | JP |
2006224060 | Aug 2006 | JP |
2009537152 | Oct 2009 | JP |
2009278971 | Dec 2009 | JP |
2008030914 | Mar 2008 | WO |
2008070198 | Jun 2008 | WO |
2012075360 | Jun 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report for PCT/US2011/063005 dated Apr. 3, 2012. |
Singapore Search Report and Written Opinion based on Application No. 2013042734 dated Feb. 22, 2016. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140051155 A1 | Feb 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61419680 | Dec 2010 | US |