1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to thermally-coated wall anchors and associated veneer ties and anchoring systems for cavity walls having a masonry inner and outer wythe. More particularly, the invention relates to anchoring systems with thermally-isolating coated wall anchors and associated components made largely of thermally conductive metals. The system has application to seismic-resistant structures and to cavity walls requiring thermal isolation.
2. Description of the Prior Art
The move toward more energy-efficient insulated cavity wall structures has led to the need to create a thermally-isolated building envelope which separates the interior environment and the exterior environment of a cavity wall structure. The building envelope is designed to control temperature, thermal transfer between the wythes and moisture development, while maintaining structural integrity. Thermal insulation is used within the building envelope to maintain temperature and therefore restrict the formation of condensation within the cavity. The integrity of the thermal insulation is compromised when used in conjunction with the prior art metal anchoring systems, which are constructed from thermally conductive metals that facilitate thermal transfer between and through the wythes. The use of the specially designed and thermally-protected wall anchors of the present invention lowers the underlying metal thermal conductivities, thereby reducing thermal transfer.
When a cavity wall is constructed and a thermal envelope created, hundreds, if not thousands, of wall anchors, wall reinforcements and associated ties are inserted throughout the cavity wall. Each anchor and tie combination forms a thermal bridge perforating the insulation and moisture barriers within the cavity wall structure. While seals at the insertion locations deter water and vapor entry, thermal transfer and loss still result. Further, when each individual anchoring system is interconnected veneer-tie-to-wall-anchor, a thermal thread results stretching across the cavity and extending between the inner wythe to the outer wythe. Failure to isolate the steel components and break the thermal transfer, results in heating and cooling losses and potentially damaging condensation buildup within the cavity wall structure. Such buildups provide a medium for corrosion and mold growth. The use of thermally-isolating coated wall anchors removes the thermal bridges and breaks the thermal thread causing a thermally isolated anchoring system with a resulting lower heat loss within the building envelope.
The present invention provides a thermally-isolating coated wall anchor specially-suited for use within a cavity wall having an masonry inner and outer wythe. Anchoring systems within cavity walls are subject to varied outside forces such as earthquakes and wind shear that cause abrupt movement within the cavity wall, requiring high-strength anchoring materials. Additionally, any materials placed within the cavity wall require the characteristics of low flammability and, upon combustion, the release of combustion products with low toxicity. The present invention provides a coating suited to such requirements, which, besides meeting the flammability/toxicity standards, includes characteristics such as shock resistance, non-frangibility, low thermal conductivity and transmissivity, and a non-porous resilient finish. This unique combination of characteristics provides a wall anchor well-suited for installation within a cavity wall anchoring system.
In the past, anchoring systems have taken a variety of configurations. Where the applications included masonry backup walls, wall anchors were commonly incorporated into ladder—or truss-type reinforcements and provided wire-to-wire connections with box-ties or pintle-receiving designs on the veneer side.
In the late 1980's, surface-mounted wall anchors were developed by Hohmann & Barnard, Inc., now a MiTEK-Berkshire Hathaway Company, and patented under U.S. Pat. No. 4,598,518. The invention was commercialized under trademarks DW-10®, DW-10-X®, and DW-10-HS®. These widely accepted building specialty products were designed primarily for dry-wall construction, but were also used with masonry backup walls. For seismic applications, it was common practice to use these wall anchors as part of the DW-10® Seismiclip® interlock system which added a Byna-Tie® wire formative, a Seismiclip® snap-in device—described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,875,319 (319), and a continuous wire reinforcement.
In an insulated dry wall application, the surface-mounted wall anchor of the above-described system has pronged legs that pierce the insulation and the wallboard and rest against the metal stud to provide mechanical stability in a four-point landing arrangement. The vertical slot of the wall anchor enables the mason to have the wire tie adjustably positioned along a pathway of up to 3.625-inch (max.). The interlock system served well and received high scores in testing and engineering evaluations which examined effects of various forces, particularly lateral forces, upon brick veneer masonry construction. However, under certain conditions, the system did not sufficiently maintain the integrity of the insulation. Also, upon the promulgation of more rigorous specifications by which tension and compression characteristics were raised, a different structure—such as one of those described in detail below—became necessary.
The engineering evaluations further described the advantages of having a continuous wire embedded in the mortar joint of anchored veneer wythes. The seismic aspects of these investigations were reported in the inventor's '319 patent. Besides earthquake protection, the failure of several high-rise buildings to withstand wind and other lateral forces resulted in the incorporation of a continuous wire reinforcement requirement in the Uniform Building Code provisions. The use of a continuous wire in masonry veneer walls has also been found to provide protection against problems arising from thermal expansion and contraction and to improve the uniformity of the distribution of lateral forces in the structure.
Shortly after the introduction of the pronged wall anchor, a seismic veneer anchor, which incorporated an L-shaped backplate, was introduced. This was formed from either 12- or 14-gauge sheetmetal and provided horizontally disposed openings in the arms thereof for pintle legs of the veneer anchor. In general, the pintle-receiving sheetmetal version of the Seismiclip interlock system served well, but in addition to the insulation integrity problem, installations were hampered by mortar buildup interfering with pintle leg insertion.
In the 1980's, an anchor for masonry veneer walls was developed and described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,764,069 by Reinwall et al., which patent is an improvement of the masonry veneer anchor of Lopez, U.S. Pat. No. 4,473,984. Here the anchors are keyed to elements that are installed using power-rotated drivers to deposit a mounting stud in a cementitious or masonry backup wall. Fittings are then attached to the stud, which include an elongated eye and a wire tie therethrough for deposition in a bed joint of the outer wythe. It is instructive to note that pin-point loading—that is forces concentrated at substantially a single point—developed from this design configuration. This resulted, upon experiencing lateral forces over time, in the loosening of the stud.
There have been significant shifts in public sector building specifications, such as the Energy Code Requirement, Boston, Mass. (see Chapter 13 of 780 CMR, Seventh Edition). This Code sets forth insulation R-values well in excess of prior editions and evokes an engineering response opting for thicker insulation and correspondingly larger cavities. Here, the emphasis is upon creating a building envelope that is designed and constructed with a continuous air barrier to control air leakage into or out of conditioned space adjacent the inner wythe, which have resulted in architects and architectural engineers requiring larger and larger cavities in the exterior cavity walls of public buildings. These requirements are imposed without corresponding decreases in wind shear and seismic resistance levels or increases in mortar bed joint height. Thus, wall anchors are needed to occupy the same ⅜ inch high space in the inner wythe and tie down a veneer facing material of an outer wythe at a span of two or more times that which had previously been experienced.
As insulation became thicker, the tearing of insulation during installation of the pronged DW-10X® wall anchor, see infra, became more prevalent. This occurred as the installer would fully insert one side of the wall anchor before seating the other side. The tearing would occur at two times, namely, during the arcuate path of the insertion of the second leg and separately upon installation of the attaching hardware. The gapping caused in the insulation permitted air and moisture to infiltrate through the insulation along the pathway formed by the tear. While the gapping was largely resolved by placing a self-sealing, dual-barrier polymeric membrane at the site of the legs and the mounting hardware, with increasing thickness in insulation, this patchwork became less desirable.
As concerns for thermal transfer and resulting heat loss/gain and the buildup of condensation within the cavity wall grew, focus turned to thermal isolation and thermal breaks. Another prior art development occurred in an attempt to address thermal transfer shortly after that of Reinwall/Lopez when Hatzinikolas and Pacholok of Fero Holding Ltd. introduced their sheetmetal masonry connector for a cavity wall. This device is described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,392,581 and 4,869,043. Here a sheetmetal plate connects to the side of a dry wall column and protrudes through the insulation into the cavity. A wire tie is threaded through a slot in the leading edge of the plate capturing an insulative plate thereunder and extending into a bed joint of the veneer. The underlying sheetmetal plate is highly thermally conductive, and the '581 patent describes lowering the thermal conductivity by foraminously structuring the plate. However, as there is no thermal break, a concomitant loss of the insulative integrity results. Further reductions in thermal transfer were accomplished through the Byna-Tie® system (319) which provides a bail handle with pointed legs and a dual sealing arrangement as described, U.S. Pat. No. 8,037,653. While each prior art invention reduced thermal transfer, neither development provided more complete thermal protection through the use of a specialized thermally-isolating coated wall anchor, which removes thermal bridging and improves thermal insulation through the use of a thermal barrier.
Focus on the thermal characteristics of cavity wall construction is important to ensuring minimized heat transfer through the walls, both for comfort and for energy efficiency of heating and air conditioning. When the exterior is cold relative to the interior of a heated structure, heat from the interior should be prevented from passing through the outside. Similarly, when the exterior is hot relative to the interior of an air conditioned structure, heat from the exterior should be prevented from passing through to the interior. The main cause of thermal transfer is the use of anchoring systems made largely of metal wire formatives, or metal plate components, that are thermally conductive. While providing the required high-strength within the cavity wall system, the use of steel components results in heat transfer.
Another application for anchoring systems is in the evolving technology of self-cooling buildings. Here, the cavity wall serves additionally as a plenum for delivering air from one area to another. The ability to size cavities to match air moving requirements for naturally ventilated buildings enable the architectural engineer to now consider cavity walls when designing structures in this environmentally favorable form.
Building thermal stability within a cavity wall system requires the ability to hold the internal temperature of the cavity wall within a certain interval. This ability helps to prevent the development of cold spots, which act as gathering points for condensation. Through the use of a thermally-isolating coating, the underlying steel wall anchor obtains a lower transmission (U-value) and thermal conductive value (K-value) and provides non-corrosive benefits. The present invention maintains the strength of the steel and further provides the benefits of a thermal break in the cavity.
In the past, the use of wire formatives have been limited by the mortar layer thicknesses which, in turn are dictated either by the new building specifications or by pre-existing conditions, e.g., matching during renovations or additions the existing mortar layer thickness. While arguments have been made for increasing the number of the fine-wire anchors per unit area of the facing layer, architects and architectural engineers have favored wire formative anchors of sturdier wire. On the other hand, contractors find that heavy wire anchors, with diameters approaching the mortar layer height specification, frequently result in misalignment. This led to the low-profile wall anchors of the inventors hereof as described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,279,283. The combination of each individual wall anchor and tie combination linked together in a cavity wall setting creates a thermal thread throughout the structure thereby raising thermal conductivity and reducing the effectiveness of the insulation. The present invention provides a thermal break which interrupts and restricts thermal transfer.
In the course of preparing this application, several patents, became known to the inventors hereof and are acknowledged hereby:
It is noted that with some exceptions these devices are generally descriptive of wire-to-wire anchors and wall ties and have various cooperative functional relationships with straight wire runs embedded in the inner and/or outer wythe.
U.S. Pat. No. 3,377,764—Storch—Issued Apr. 16, 1968
Discloses a bent wire, tie-type anchor for embedment in a facing exterior wythe engaging with a loop attached to a straight wire run in a backup interior wythe.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,021,990—Schwalber—Issued May 10, 1977
Discloses a dry wall construction system for anchoring a facing veneer to wallboard/metal stud construction with a pronged sheetmetal anchor. Like Storch '764, the wall tie is embedded in the exterior wythe and is not attached to a straight wire run.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,373,314—Allan—Issued Feb. 15, 1983
Discloses a vertical angle iron with one leg adapted for attachment to a stud; and the other having elongated slots to accommodate wall ties. Insulation is applied between projecting vertical legs of adjacent angle irons with slots being spaced away from the stud to avoid the insulation.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,473,984—Lopez—Issued Oct. 2, 1984
Discloses a curtain-wall masonry anchor system wherein a wall tie is attached to the inner wythe by a self-tapping screw to a metal stud and to the outer wythe by embedment in a corresponding bed joint. The stud is applied through a hole cut into the insulation.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,869,038—Catani—Issued Sep. 26, 1989
Discloses a veneer wall anchor system having in the interior wythe a truss-type anchor, similar to Hala et al. '226, supra, but with horizontal sheetmetal extensions. The extensions are interlocked with bent wire pintle-type wall ties that are embedded within the exterior wythe.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,875,319—Hohmann—Issued Sep. 24, 1989
Discloses a seismic construction system for anchoring a facing veneer to wallboard/metal stud construction with a pronged sheetmetal anchor. The wall tie is distinguished over that of Schwalberg '990 and is clipped onto a straight wire run.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,392,581—Hatzinikolas et al.—Issued Feb. 28, 1995
Discloses a cavity-wall anchor having a conventional tie wire for mounting in the brick veneer and an L-shaped sheetmetal bracket for mounting vertically between side-by-side blocks and horizontally on atop a course of blocks. The bracket has a slit which is vertically disposed and protrudes into the cavity. The slit provides for a vertically adjustable anchor.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,408,798—Hohmann—Issued Apr. 25, 1995
Discloses a seismic construction system for a cavity wall having a masonry anchor, a wall tie, and a facing anchor. Sealed eye wires extend into the cavity and wire wall ties are threaded therethrough with the open ends thereof embedded with a Hohmann '319 (see supra) clip in the mortar layer of the brick veneer.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,456,052—Anderson et al.—Issued Oct. 10, 1995
Discloses a two-part masonry brick tie, the first part being designed to be installed in the inner wythe and then, later when the brick veneer is erected to be interconnected by the second part. Both parts are constructed from sheetmetal and are arranged on substantially the same horizontal plane.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,816,008—Hohmann—Issued Sep. 15, 1998
Discloses a brick veneer anchor primarily for use with a cavity wall with a drywall inner wythe. The device combines an L-shaped plate for mounting on the metal stud of the drywall and extending into the cavity with a T-head bent stay. After interengagement with the L-shaped plate the free end of the bent stay is embedded in the corresponding bed joint of the veneer.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,125,608—Charlson—Issued Sep. 3, 2000
Discloses a composite insulated framing system within a structural building system. The Charlson system includes an insulator adhered to the structural support through the use of adhesives, frictional forces or mechanical fasteners to disrupt thermal activity.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,209,281—Rice—Issued Apr. 3, 2001
Discloses a masonry anchor having a conventional tie wire for mounting in the brick veneer and sheetmetal bracket for mounting on the metal-stud-supported drywall. The bracket has a slit which is vertically disposed when the bracket is mounted on the metal stud and, in application, protrudes through the drywall into the cavity. The slit provides for a vertically adjustable anchor.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,279,283—Hohmann et al.—Issued Aug. 28, 2001
Discloses a low-profile wall tie primarily for use in renovation construction where in order to match existing mortar height in the facing wythe a compressed wall tie is embedded in the bed joint of the brick veneer.
U.S. Pat. No. 8,109,706—Richards—Issued Feb. 7, 2012
Discloses a composite fastener, belly nut and tie system for use in a building envelope. The composite fastener includes a fiber reinforced polymer. The fastener has a low thermal conductive value and non-corrosive properties.
None of the prior art listed above provide a thermally-isolating coated anchoring system that maintains the thermal isolation of a building envelope. As will become clear in reviewing the disclosure which follows, the cavity wall structures benefit from the recent developments described herein that lead to solving the problems of thermal insulation and heat transfer within the cavity wall. The wall anchor assembly is modifiable for use on various style wall anchors allowing for interconnection with veneer ties in varied cavity wall structures. The prior art does not provide the present novel cavity wall construction system as described herein below.
In general terms, the invention disclosed hereby is a high-strength thermally-isolating wire formative anchoring system for use in a masonry cavity wall structure. The wall anchor is thermally-coated and interconnected with varied veneer ties. The veneer ties are wire formatives configured for insertion within the wall anchor and the bed joints of the outer wythe. The veneer ties are optionally compressed forming a low profile construct and swaged for interconnection with a reinforcement wire to form a seismic construct.
The thermally-isolated wall anchor and anchoring system is a wire formative device with varied veneer tie receptor portions for interconnection with a veneer tie. The wall anchor provides a thermal break in the cavity wall structure through the use of a novel thermally-isolating coating. The veneer tie receptor portion and optionally, the leg portions and the rear leg receive a thermally-isolating coating. The thermally-isolating coating is selected from a distinct grouping of materials, which are applied using a specific variety of methods, in one or more layers which are cured and cross-linked to provide high-strength adhesion. A matte finish is provided to form a high-strength interconnection. The thermally-coated wall anchors provide an in-cavity thermal break that interrupts the thermal conduction in the anchoring system threads running throughout the cavity wall structure. The thermal coating reduces the U- and K-values of the anchoring system by thermally-isolating the metal components.
The thermally-isolated anchoring system includes a wire formative wall anchor affixed to a wall reinforcement. A veneer tie with an optional reinforcement wire is interengaged with the wall anchor and mounted within the outer wythe. The veneer tie is a pintle device and when interconnected with the wall anchor restricts movement and veneer tie pullout.
It is an object of the present invention to provide new and novel anchoring systems for cavity walls, which systems are thermally isolating.
It is another object of the present invention to provide a new and novel high-strength metal wall anchor which is thermally coated with a thermally-isolating compound that reduces the U- and K-values of the anchoring system.
It is yet another object of the present invention to provide in an anchoring system having an inner wythe and an outer wythe, a high-strength wall anchor that interengages a veneer tie.
It is still yet another object of the present invention to provide an anchoring system which is constructed to maintain insulation integrity within the building envelope by providing a thermal break.
It is a feature of the present invention that the wall anchor hereof provides thermal isolation of the anchoring system.
It is another feature of the present invention that the wall anchor is utilizable with a masonry wall reinforcement construct that is secured within the bed joints of the inner wythe and is interconnected with a veneer tie.
It is another feature of the present invention that the thermally-coated wall anchor provides an in-cavity thermal break.
It is a further feature of the present invention that the wall anchor coating is shock resistant, resilient and noncombustible.
Other objects and features of the invention will become apparent upon review of the drawings and the detailed description which follows.
In the following drawings, the same parts in the various views are afforded the same reference designators.
Before entering into the detailed Description of the Preferred Embodiments, several terms which will be revisited later are defined. These terms are relevant to discussions of innovations introduced by the improvements of this disclosure that overcome the technical shortcoming of the prior art devices.
In the embodiments described hereinbelow, the inner wythe is optionally provided with insulation and/or a waterproofing membrane. In the cavity wall construction shown in the embodiments hereof, this takes the form of exterior insulation disposed on the outer surface of the inner wythe. Recently, building codes have required that after the anchoring system is installed and, prior to the inner wythe being closed up, that an inspection be made for insulation integrity to ensure that the insulation prevents infiltration of air and moisture. Here the term insulation integrity is used in the same sense as the building code in that, after the installation of the anchoring system, there is no change or interference with the insulative properties and concomitantly substantially no change in the air and moisture infiltration characteristics.
In a related sense, prior art wire formative anchors and anchoring systems have formed a conductive bridge between the wall cavity and the interior of the building. Here the terms thermal conductivity and thermal conductivity analysis are used to examine this phenomenon and the metal-to-metal contacts across the inner wythe. The present anchoring system serves to sever the conductive bridge and interrupt the thermal pathway created throughout the cavity wall by the metal components, including a reinforcement wire which provides a seismic structure. Failure to isolate the metal components of the anchoring system and break the thermal transfer, results in heating and cooling losses and in potentially damaging condensation buildup within the cavity wall structure.
In the detailed description, the wall anchor and reinforcement and the veneer ties and reinforcement wires are wire formatives. The wire used in the fabrication of veneer joint reinforcement conforms to the requirements of ASTM Standard Specification A951-00, Table 1. For the purpose of this application tensile strength tests and yield tests of veneer joint reinforcements are, where applicable, those denominated in ASTM A-951-00 Standard Specification for Masonry Joint Reinforcement.
The thermal stability within the cavity wall maintains the internal temperature of the cavity wall within a certain interval. Through the use of the presently described thermally-isolating coating, the underlying metal wire formative wall anchor, obtains a lower transmission (U-value) and thermal conductive value (K-value), providing a high strength anchor with the benefits of thermal isolation. The term K-value is used to describe the measure of heat conductivity of a particular material, i.e., the measure of the amount of heat, in BTUs per hour, that will be transmitted through one square foot of material that is one inch thick to cause a temperature change of one degree Fahrenheit from one side of the material to the other. The lower the K-value, the better the performance of the material as an insulator. The metal wire comprising the components of the anchoring systems generally have a K-value range of 16 to 116 W/m K. The thermal coating disposed on the wall anchor of this invention greatly reduces such K-values to a low thermal conductive (K-value) not to exceed 1 W/m K. Similar to the K-value, a low thermal transmission value (U-value) is important to the thermal integrity of the cavity wall. The term U-value is used to describe a measure of heat loss in a building component. It can also be referred to as an overall heat transfer co-efficient and measures how well parts of a building transfer heat. The higher the U-value, the worse the thermal performance of the building envelope. Low thermal transmission or U-value is defined as not to exceed 0.35 W/m2K for walls. The U-value is calculated from the reciprocal of the combined thermal resistances of the materials in the cavity wall, taking into account the effect of thermal bridges, air gaps and fixings.
Referring now to
The thermally-isolating anchoring system for cavity walls is referred to generally by the numeral 10. A cavity wall structure 12 is shown having an inner wythe or backup wall 14 of successive courses of masonry block 16 with mortar-filled bed joints 22 of a predetermined height between each adjacent course 16 and an outer wythe or facing wall 18 of brick 20 construction. Between the inner wythe 14 and the outer wythe 18, a cavity 23 is formed. The inner wythe 14 has optional attached insulation 26.
Successive bed joints 30 in the outer wythe 18 and bed joints 22 in the inner wythe 14 are substantially planar and horizontally disposed and in accord with building standards are a predetermined 0.375-inch (approx.) in height. Selective ones of bed joints 30, which are formed between courses of bricks 20, are constructed to receive therewithin the insertion portion 68 of the veneer tie 44 of the anchoring system hereof. Selective ones of bed joints 22, which are formed between courses of masonry block 16, are constructed to receive therewithin the wall reinforcement 46 of the anchoring system hereof. The wall reinforcement 46 is constructed from a pair of side wires 50, 52 disposed parallel to each other. The pair of side wires 50, 52 each have a longitudinal axis 17. Intermediate wires 54 are affixed to the interior sides 56, 58 of the side wires 50, 52 configuring the wall reinforcement 46 in either a truss (
For purposes of discussion, the cavity surface 24 of the inner wythe 14 contains a horizontal line or x-axis 34 and an intersecting vertical line or y-axis 36. A horizontal line or z-axis 38, normal to the xy-plane, passes through the coordinate origin formed by the intersecting x- and y-axes. As shown in
A thermally-isolating coating or thermal coating 85 is applied to the veneer tie receptor portion 64 (as shown in
The thermal coating 85 reduces the K-value and the U-value of the underlying metal components which include, but are not limited to, mill galvanized, hot galvanized, and stainless steel. Such components have K-values that range from 16 to 116 W/m K. The thermal coating 85 reduces the K-value of the veneer tie 44 to not exceed 1.0 W/m K and the associated U-value to not exceed 0.35 W/m2K. The thermal coating 85 is not combustible and gives off no toxic smoke in the event of a fire. Additionally, the thermal coating 85 provides corrosion protection which protects against deterioration of the anchoring system 10 over time.
The thermal coating 85 is applied through any number of methods including fluidized bed production, thermal spraying, hot dip processing, heat-assisted fluid coating, or extrusion, and includes both powder and fluid coating to form a reasonably uniform coating. A coating 85 having a thickness of at least about 5 micrometers is optimally applied. The thermal coating 85 is applied in layers in a manner that provides strong adhesion to the wall anchor 40. The thermal coating 85 is cured to achieve good cross-linking of the layers. Appropriate examples of the nature of the coating and application process are set forth in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,284,311 and 6,612,343.
The veneer tie 44 is a wire formative generally with a pintle design and shown in
The dimensional relationship between wall anchor 40 and veneer tie 44 limits the axial movement of the construct. The veneer tie 44 is a wire formative. Each veneer tie 44 has an interengaging end portion 90 which is in close fitting functional relationship with the diameter of the veneer tie receptor portion 64 and an insertion portion 68 for insertion within the outer wythe 14. The veneer tie receptor portion 64 is constructed, in accordance with the building code requirements, to be within the predetermined dimensions to limit the z-axis 38 movement and permit y-axis 36 adjustment of the veneer tie 44. The dimensional relationship of the interengaging end portion 80 to the veneer tie receptor portion 64 limits the x-axis movement of the construct.
The insertion portion 68 is optionally (
As shown in the description and drawings, the present invention serves to thermally isolate the components of the anchoring system reducing the thermal transmission and conductivity values of the anchoring system to low levels. The novel coating provides an insulating effect that is high-strength and provides an in-cavity thermal break, severing the thermal threads created from the interlocking anchoring system components.
In the above description of the anchoring systems of this invention various configurations are described and applications thereof in corresponding anchoring systems are provided. Because many varying and different embodiments may be made within the scope of the inventive concept herein taught, and because many modifications may be made in the embodiments herein detailed in accordance with the descriptive requirement of the law, it is to be understood that the details herein are to be interpreted as illustrative and not in a limiting sense.
This application is a continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 13/786,982, filed Mar. 6, 2013, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,038,351, issued May 26, 2015, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
819869 | Dunlap | May 1906 | A |
903000 | Priest | Nov 1908 | A |
1014157 | Lewen | Jan 1912 | A |
1170419 | Coon et al. | Feb 1916 | A |
RE15979 | Schaefer et al. | Jan 1925 | E |
1794684 | Handel | Mar 1931 | A |
1936223 | Awbrey | Nov 1933 | A |
1988124 | Johnson | Jan 1935 | A |
2058148 | Hard | Oct 1936 | A |
2097821 | Mathers | Nov 1937 | A |
2280647 | Hawes | Apr 1942 | A |
2300181 | Spaight | Oct 1942 | A |
2343764 | Fuller | Mar 1944 | A |
2403566 | Thorp et al. | Jul 1946 | A |
2413772 | Morehouse | Jan 1947 | A |
2605867 | Goodwin | Aug 1952 | A |
2780936 | Hillberg | Feb 1957 | A |
2898758 | Henrickson | Aug 1959 | A |
2909054 | Phillips | Oct 1959 | A |
2929238 | Kaye | Mar 1960 | A |
2966705 | Massey | Jan 1961 | A |
2999571 | Huber | Sep 1961 | A |
3030670 | Bigelow | Apr 1962 | A |
3088361 | Hallock | May 1963 | A |
3114220 | Maddox et al. | Dec 1963 | A |
3121978 | Reiland | Feb 1964 | A |
3183628 | Smith | May 1965 | A |
3254736 | Gass | Jun 1966 | A |
3277626 | Brynjolfsson et al. | Oct 1966 | A |
3300939 | Brynjolfsson et al. | Jan 1967 | A |
3309828 | Tribble | Mar 1967 | A |
3310926 | Brandreth et al. | Mar 1967 | A |
3341998 | Lucas | Sep 1967 | A |
3377764 | Storch | Apr 1968 | A |
3440922 | Cohen | Apr 1969 | A |
3478409 | Votaw et al. | Nov 1969 | A |
3478480 | Swenson | Nov 1969 | A |
3529508 | Cooksey | Sep 1970 | A |
3563131 | Ridley, Sr. | Feb 1971 | A |
3568389 | Gulow | Mar 1971 | A |
3640043 | Querfeld et al. | Feb 1972 | A |
3803972 | Deutsher | Apr 1974 | A |
3897712 | Black | Aug 1975 | A |
3911783 | Gapp et al. | Oct 1975 | A |
3925996 | Wiggill | Dec 1975 | A |
3964226 | Hala et al. | Jun 1976 | A |
3964227 | Hala | Jun 1976 | A |
4021990 | Schwalberg | May 1977 | A |
4227359 | Schlenker | Oct 1980 | A |
4238987 | Siebrecht-Reuter | Dec 1980 | A |
4281494 | Weinar | Aug 1981 | A |
4305239 | Geraghty | Dec 1981 | A |
4373314 | Allan | Feb 1983 | A |
4382416 | Kellogg-Smith | May 1983 | A |
4410760 | Cole | Oct 1983 | A |
4424745 | Magorian et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
4438611 | Bryant | Mar 1984 | A |
4460300 | Bettini et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
4473984 | Lopez | Oct 1984 | A |
4482368 | Roberts | Nov 1984 | A |
4571909 | Berghuis et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4596102 | Catani et al. | Jun 1986 | A |
4598518 | Hohmann | Jul 1986 | A |
4606163 | Catani | Aug 1986 | A |
4622796 | Aziz et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4628657 | Ermer et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4636125 | Burgard | Jan 1987 | A |
4640848 | Cerdan-Diaz et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4660342 | Salisbury | Apr 1987 | A |
4688363 | Sweeney et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4703604 | Muller | Nov 1987 | A |
4708551 | Richter et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4714507 | Ohgushi | Dec 1987 | A |
4723866 | McCauley | Feb 1988 | A |
4738070 | Abbott et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4757662 | Gasser | Jul 1988 | A |
4764069 | Reinwall et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4819401 | Whitney, Jr. | Apr 1989 | A |
4827684 | Allan | May 1989 | A |
4830196 | Csanady | May 1989 | A |
4843776 | Guignard | Jul 1989 | A |
4852320 | Ballantyne | Aug 1989 | A |
4869038 | Catani | Sep 1989 | A |
4869043 | Hatzinikolas et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4875319 | Hohmann | Oct 1989 | A |
4887951 | Hashimoto | Dec 1989 | A |
4911949 | Iwase et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4922680 | Kramer et al. | May 1990 | A |
4923348 | Carlozzo et al. | May 1990 | A |
4946632 | Pollina | Aug 1990 | A |
4948319 | Day et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4955172 | Pierson | Sep 1990 | A |
4993902 | Hellon | Feb 1991 | A |
5063722 | Hohmann | Nov 1991 | A |
5099628 | Noland et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5207043 | McGee | May 1993 | A |
5307602 | Lebraut | May 1994 | A |
5338141 | Hulsey | Aug 1994 | A |
5392581 | Hatzinikolas et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5395196 | Notaro | Mar 1995 | A |
5408798 | Hohmann | Apr 1995 | A |
5440854 | Hohmann | Aug 1995 | A |
5454200 | Hohmann | Oct 1995 | A |
5456052 | Anderson et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5490366 | Burns et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5501306 | Martino | Mar 1996 | A |
5518351 | Peil | May 1996 | A |
5598673 | Atkins | Feb 1997 | A |
5634310 | Hohmann | Jun 1997 | A |
5669592 | Kearful | Sep 1997 | A |
5671578 | Hohmann | Sep 1997 | A |
5673527 | Coston et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5755070 | Hohmann | May 1998 | A |
5816008 | Hohmann | Oct 1998 | A |
5819486 | Goodings | Oct 1998 | A |
5845455 | Johnson, III | Dec 1998 | A |
6000178 | Goodings | Dec 1999 | A |
6045022 | Giles | Apr 2000 | A |
6125608 | Charlson | Oct 2000 | A |
6176662 | Champney et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6209281 | Rice | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6284311 | Gregorovich et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6293744 | Hemplfing et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6332300 | Wakai | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6351922 | Burns et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6367219 | Quinlan | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6508447 | Catani et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6548190 | Spitsberg et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6612343 | Camberlin et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6627128 | Boyer | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6668505 | Hohmann et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6686301 | Li et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6709213 | Bailey | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6718774 | Razzell | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6735915 | Johnson, III | May 2004 | B1 |
6739105 | Fleming | May 2004 | B2 |
6812276 | Yeager | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6817147 | MacDonald | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6827969 | Skoog et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6837013 | Foderberg et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6851239 | Hohmann et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6918218 | Greenway | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6925768 | Hohmann et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6941717 | Hohmann et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6968659 | Boyer | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7007433 | Boyer | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7017318 | Hohmann et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7043884 | Moreno | May 2006 | B2 |
7059577 | Burgett | Jun 2006 | B1 |
D527834 | Thimons et al. | Sep 2006 | S |
7147419 | Balbo Di Vinadio | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7152382 | Johnson, III | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7171788 | Bronner | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7178299 | Hyde et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
D538948 | Thimons et al. | Mar 2007 | S |
7225590 | diGirolamo et al. | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7325366 | Hohmann, Jr. | Feb 2008 | B1 |
7334374 | Schmid | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7374825 | Hazel et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7415803 | Bronner | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7469511 | Wobber | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7481032 | Tarr | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7552566 | Hyde et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7562506 | Hohmann, Jr. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7587874 | Hohmann, Jr. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7654057 | Zambelli et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7735292 | Massie | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7744321 | Wells | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7748181 | Guinn | Jul 2010 | B1 |
7788869 | Voegele, Jr. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
D626817 | Donowho et al. | Nov 2010 | S |
7845137 | Hohmann, Jr. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7918634 | Conrad et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8029223 | Mair | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8037653 | Hohmann, Jr. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8051619 | Hohmann, Jr. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8092134 | Oguri et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8096090 | Hohmann, Jr. et al. | Jan 2012 | B1 |
8109706 | Richards | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8154859 | Shahrokhi | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8201374 | Hohmann, Jr. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8209934 | Pettingale | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8215083 | Toas et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8291672 | Hohmann, Jr. et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8347581 | Doerr et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8375667 | Hohmann, Jr. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8418422 | Johnson, III | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8511041 | Fransen | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8516763 | Hohmann, Jr. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8516768 | Johnson, III | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8544228 | Bronner | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8555587 | Hohmann, Jr. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8555596 | Hohmann, Jr. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8596010 | Hohmann, Jr. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8609224 | Li et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8635832 | Heudorfer et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8661766 | Hohmann, Jr. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8726596 | Hohmann, Jr. | May 2014 | B2 |
8726597 | Hohmann, Jr. | May 2014 | B2 |
8733049 | Hohmann, Jr. | May 2014 | B2 |
8739485 | Hohmann, Jr. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8800241 | Hohmann, Jr. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8833003 | Hohmann, Jr. | Sep 2014 | B1 |
8839581 | Hohmann, Jr. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8839587 | Hohmann, Jr. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8844229 | Hohmann, Jr. | Sep 2014 | B1 |
8881488 | Hohmann, Jr. et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8898980 | Hohmann, Jr. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8904726 | Hohmann, Jr. | Dec 2014 | B1 |
8904730 | Hohmann, Jr. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8904731 | Hohmann, Jr. et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8910445 | Hohmann, Jr. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8920092 | D'Addario et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8984837 | Curtis et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
20010054270 | Rice | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020047488 | Webb et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020100239 | Lopez | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030121226 | Bolduc | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030217521 | Richardson et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040050807 | Cheng | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040083667 | Johnson, III | May 2004 | A1 |
20040187421 | Johnson, III | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040216408 | Hohmann, Jr. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040216413 | Hohmann et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040216416 | Hohmann et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040231270 | Collins et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050046187 | Takeuchi et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050129485 | Swim, Jr. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050279042 | Bronner | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050279043 | Bronner | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060198717 | Fuest | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060242921 | Massie | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060251916 | Arikawa et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070011964 | Smith | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070059121 | Chien | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20080092472 | Doerr et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080141605 | Hohmann | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080166203 | Reynolds et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080222992 | Hikai et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090133351 | Wobber | May 2009 | A1 |
20090133357 | Richards | May 2009 | A1 |
20090173828 | Oguri et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20100037552 | Bronner | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100071307 | Hohmann, Jr. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100101175 | Hohmann | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100192495 | Huff et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100257803 | Hohmann, Jr. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110041442 | Bui | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110047919 | Hohmann, Jr. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110061333 | Bronner | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110083389 | Bui | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110146195 | Hohmann, Jr. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110164943 | Conrad et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110173902 | Hohmann, Jr. et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110189480 | Hung | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110277397 | Hohmann, Jr. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120186183 | Johnson, III | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120285111 | Johnson, III | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120304576 | Hohmann, Jr. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120308330 | Hohmann, Jr. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130008121 | Dalen | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130074442 | Hohmann, Jr. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130232893 | Hohmann, Jr. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130232909 | Curtis et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130247483 | Hohmann, Jr. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130247484 | Hohmann, Jr. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130247498 | Hohmann, Jr. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130340378 | Hohmann, Jr. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140075855 | Hohmann, Jr. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140075856 | Hohmann, Jr. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140075879 | Hohmann, Jr. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140096466 | Hohmann, Jr. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140174013 | Hohmann, Jr. et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140202098 | De Smet et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140215958 | Duyvejonck et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140250826 | Hohmann, Jr. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150033651 | Hohmann, Jr. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150096243 | Hohmann, Jr. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150121792 | Spoo et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
279209 | Mar 1952 | CH |
0 199 595 | Mar 1995 | EP |
1 575 501 | Sep 1980 | GB |
2 069 024 | Aug 1981 | GB |
2 246 149 | Jan 1992 | GB |
2 265 164 | Sep 1993 | GB |
2459936 | Mar 2013 | GB |
Entry |
---|
ASTM Standard E754-80 (2006), Standard Test Method for Pullout Resistance of Ties and Anchors Embedded in Masonry Mortar Joints, ASTM International, 8 pages, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, United States. |
ASTM Standard Specification A951/A951M-11, Table 1, Standard Specification for Steel Wire for Masonry Joint Reinforcement, Nov. 14, 2011, 6 pages, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, United States. |
State Board of Building Regulations and Standards, Building Envelope Requirements, 780 CMR sec. 1304.0 et seq., 7th Edition, Aug. 22, 2008, 11 pages, Boston, MA, United States. |
Building Code Requirements for Masonry Structures and Commentary, TMS 402-11/ACI 530-11/ASCE 5-11, 2011, Chapter 6, 12 pages. |
Hohmann & Barnard, Inc., Product Catalog, 44 pgs (2003). |
Hohmann & Barnard, Inc.; Product Catalog, 2009, 52 pages, Hauppauge, New York, United States. |
Hohmann & Barnard, Inc., Product Catalog, 2013, 52 pages, Hauppauge, New York, United States. |
Kossecka, Ph.D, et al., Effect of Insulation and Mass Distribution in Exterior Walls on Dynamic Thermal Performance of Whole Buildings, Thermal Envelopes VII/Building Systems—Principles p. 721-731, 1998, 11 pages. |
Examination Report for Canadian Application No. 2,844,460, Jan. 12, 2017, 3 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150252560 A1 | Sep 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13786982 | Mar 2013 | US |
Child | 14719655 | US |