Thermally conductive polyvinyl halide

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11535737
  • Patent Number
    11,535,737
  • Date Filed
    Friday, February 2, 2018
    6 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, December 27, 2022
    a year ago
  • Inventors
  • Original Assignees
    • GEON Performance Solutions, LLC (Westlake, OH, US)
  • Examiners
    • Uselding; John E
    Agents
    • Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
Abstract
A polyvinyl halide compound has thermal conductivity and includes polyvinyl halide resin, natural or synthetic graphite of flake or spheroid form, and at least 0.5 weight percent of epoxidized vegetable oil. Selection of types and amounts of graphite and epoxidized vegetable oil provide thermal conductivity while other desirable properties of the compound are suitably maintained. The compound can be used for making any end use article that needs flame retardance and good thermal management and is especially useful as a thermally conductive material to replace die cast or extruded aluminum heat sinks in industrial applications, such as LED lighting fixtures.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates to formulations of non-plasticized polyvinyl halide, particularly rigid polyvinyl chloride, useful as a thermally conductive material to replace die cast or extruded aluminum heat sinks in industrial applications, such as LED lighting fixtures.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

People benefit from plastic articles. From their invention in the mid-20th Century until the present, thermoplastic polymers have become the composition of many consumer products. Such products are relatively lightweight, sturdy, and corrosion resistant.


Rigid poly(vinyl chloride) has been a top performing plastic resin for decades. Billions of kilograms of poly(vinyl chloride) (also known as “PVC”) resin are molded and extruded each year into countless products. With conventional additives, poly(vinyl chloride) provides unparalleled durability, flame resistance, chemical resistance, weatherability, electrical properties, and clarity to name a few.


Light emitting diodes (“LEDs”) are rapidly becoming popular for interior and exterior lighting because of their lower energy consumption as compared with incandescent lamps.


LEDs are produced in commercial quantities at a variety of color temperatures. A typical display of LEDs on sale in a commercial retail store includes LEDs in the range of “Soft White” (2700 K); “Warm White” (3000 K); “Bright White” (3500 K); and “Daylight” (5000 K), where the color temperature from 2700-5000 is measured in degrees Kelvin.


LEDs are point sources of light, intense in origin of their luminosity and very adversely affected by high temperatures generated by the electronic circuitry during use.


Lighting fixtures and many other articles for interior spaces where human occupation is possible need materials which are flame retardant sufficiently to meet or exceed regulatory and industrially managed standards. PVC is naturally flame retardant.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

What is needed is a cost-effective PVC with for use in LED general lighting fixtures having a thermal conductivity target greater than 1.0 W/(m·K) (in-plane) to replace die cast and extruded aluminum heat sinks in such lighting fixtures. PVC without additives providing thermal conductivity has only about 0.1 W/(m·K) of thermal conductivity values. It is desirable to strive for as high a thermal conductivity as is practicable.


Polyvinyl halide, especially PVC, because of its properties stated above would be a good candidate if made thermally conductive enough for use as heat sinks and other components for LED lighting fixtures.


What the art needs is a rigid polyvinyl halide material which can be inexpensively made and acceptably used as thermally conductive extruded or molded thermoplastic part in LED lighting fixtures.


It has been found that choice of rigid polyvinyl halide with a thermally conductive additive and a coupling agent can provide an acceptable thermally conductive, naturally flame retardant polymer for lighting and other interior electronic fixtures.


The choice of rigid PVC combined with thermally conductive filler and a coupling agent such as epoxidized vegetable oil can also be molded, or extruded or compression molded into a low/no porosity thermally conductive part.


One aspect of this disclosure is a polyvinyl halide compound having thermal conductivity, comprising (a) polyvinyl halide resin; (b) natural or synthetic graphite of flake or spheroid form; and (c) at least 0.5 weight percent of epoxidized vegetable oil.


Another aspect of this disclosure is a polymer article made of the compound identified above.


Features of the invention will become apparent with reference to the following embodiments. There exist various refinements of the features noted in relation to the above-mentioned aspects of the present invention. Additional features may also be incorporated in the above-mentioned aspects of the present invention. These refinements and additional features may exist individually or in any combination. For instance, various features discussed below in relation to any of the described aspects of the present invention may be incorporated into any of the described aspects of the present invention alone or in any combination.







EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION

Polyvinyl Halide Resins


Any polyvinyl halide capable of being sufficiently flexible is a candidate for use in this invention as thermoplastic resin. Polyvinyl halides are advantageous because they have inherent flame retardant properties arising from the presence of halide moieties which naturally retard onset and continuity of combustion in the presence of oxygen.


Polyvinyl halides are essentially a homopolymer or copolymer of vinyl halide, particularly chloride, with minor amounts of other co-monomers, if any. The most common polyvinyl halide is polyvinyl chloride (PVC) which is one of most common types of thermoplastic used from the mid-20th Century to the present.


PVC comprises polymerized vinyl chloride monomer where preferred polymers are essentially homopolymerized vinyl chloride with little or no copolymerized co-monomers. Useful co-monomers, if desired, include mono-unsaturated ethylenically unsaturated monomer copolymerizable with vinyl chloride monomer by addition polymerization. Useful co-monomers include other vinyl monomers such as vinyl acetate, ethers, and vinylidene chloride. Other useful co-monomers comprise mono-ethylenically unsaturated monomers including acrylics such as lower alkyl acrylates or methacrylates, acrylic and methacrylic acid, lower alkenyl olefins, vinyl aromatics such as styrene and styrene derivatives, and vinyl esters and ethers. Typical useful commercial co-monomers include acrylonitrile, 2-ethylhexyl acrylate, vinylidene chloride, and isobutyl ether. Useful PVC and CPVC copolymers can contain from about 0.1% to about 10% or 15%, preferably from about 0.5% to about 5%, by weight of copolymerized co-monomer.


A particular embodiment of PVC is CPVC, or chlorinated PVC, where PVC containing approximately 57% chlorine is further reacted with chlorine radicals produced from chlorine gas dispersed in water and irradiated to generate chlorine radicals dissolved in water to produce CPVC, a polymer with a higher glass transition temperature (Tg) and heat distortion temperature. Commercial CPVC typically contains by weight from about 58% to about 70% and preferably from about 63% to about 68% chlorine.


CPVC copolymers can be obtained by chlorinating such PVC copolymers using conventional methods such as that described in U.S. Pat. No. 2,996,489, which is incorporated herein by reference.


Preferred PVCs as starting materials are suspension polymerized vinyl chloride, although less preferred mass (bulk) polymerized can be useful. Rigid PVCs are distinguished from flexible PVCs in that former contain essentially no plasticizer.


Useful weight average molecular weights of PVCs and CPVCs can be from about 39,000 to about 150,000, and preferably from about 55,000 to about 109,000, where the molecular weight is measured by size exclusion chromatography and correlated to absolute PVC molecular weights determined by Perkins et al., Journal of Vinyl Technology, Vol. 15, No. 2 (1993).


The PVC or CPVC resin can have an inherent viscosity from about 0.5 to about 0.95 for injection molding grades and from about 0.5 to about 1.2 for extrusion and compression molding grades, as measured by using 0.2 grams of resin in 100 ml of cyclohexanone at 30 degrees C. by ASTM D1243.


The PVCs or CPVCs of this invention have a K Value ranging from about 50 to about 60 and preferably from about 50 to about 56.


Commercially available PVC resins can be used meeting the specifications stated above. Non-limiting sources of commercial PVC resin are ShinTech of Houston, Tex. USA; Kaneka Texas Corporation of Pasadena, Tex., USA; and Oxyvinyls, LLC of Dallas, Tex., USA.


Commercially available CPVC resins can be used meeting the specifications stated above. Non-limiting sources of commercial CPVC resin are Sekisui America Corporation of New York, N.Y., USA; Kaneka Texas Corporation of Pasadena, Tex., USA; and Lubrizol Corporation of Brecksville, Ohio, USA.


Graphite Thermally Conductive Additive


After consideration and experimentation, it was found that graphite can provide suitable thermally conductivity to the polyvinyl halide resin, especially PVC and CPVC. Graphite can have thermal conductivity of from about 140 to about 500 W/(m·K). Graphite in either spheroid or flake form is not particularly abrasive against polymer processing machinery surfaces.


Both flake and spheroid graphite are useful, as demonstrated in the examples below. Commercially available graphite includes:


Flake: Timrex 80×150 graphite, Timrex SFG-150 graphite, and Timrex C-Therm 011 graphite from Imerys.


Spheroid: Timrex KS-44 graphite and Timrex KS-150 graphite also available from Imerys.


The amount of graphite present in the compound can range from about 15 to about 65 wt. % and preferably from about 30 to about 55 wt. % of the compound.


Epoxidized Vegetable Oil Coupling Agent


Any vegetable oil which has been substantially fully epoxidized (i.e., an “epoxidized vegetable oil”) is a candidate to serve as a coupling agent for the mixing of the graphite with the polyvinyl halide compound during melt compounding.


Non-limiting examples of vegetable oils are oils derived from vegetable seeds, such as canola oil (iodine value about 100-115), corn oil (iodine value about 118-128), linseed oil (iodine value about 170-200), rapeseed oil (iodine value about 100-115), safflower oil (iodine value about 140-150), soybean oil (iodine value about 120-143), sunflower oil (iodine value about 125-140), tall oil (iodine value about 140-190), and tung oil (iodine value about 180) and mixtures thereof. Other vegetable oils include almond, argan, borage, castor, coconut, cotton, flax, grape, hemp, jojoba, macadamia, mango, mustard, neem, oil palm, sesame, shea, tonka bean, and mixtures of any of them with themselves or any one or more of the first list.


Among the many vegetables oils, to demonstrate the efficacy of epoxidized vegetable oil as a coupling agent, use of epoxidized soybean oil (ESO) was found to greatly improve melt compounding processing to achieve the polymer compound having little porosity. Air is an excellent insulator, both electrically and thermally. Presence of air in pores of an extruded or molded polyvinyl halide compound will reduce thermal conductivity properties.


ESO, as an exemplar for an epoxidized vegetable oil listed above, has been found to dramatically and unexpectedly reduce porosity otherwise occurring with a melt mixing of large quantities of graphite into polyvinyl halide. The ESO wets the surfaces of the graphite, whether in flake or spheroid shape, to render the graphite physically compatible with the polyvinyl halide, thereby improving both compounding processability and dispersion of the graphite throughout the volume of the polyvinyl halide in final extruded or molded shape.


The amount of epoxidized vegetable oil present in the compound can be 0.5 wt. % or higher and preferably from about 1 to about 6 wt. % of the compound.


Commercially available sources of epoxidized vegetable oils include Arkema, marketing under the brand Vikoflex® for ESO and epoxidized linseed oil grades. As the market grows for sustainable epoxy plasticizers from renewable resources, the number of commercially available epoxidized vegetable oils listed above will increase in number and will reduce in cost.


Other Optional Additives


The compound of the present invention can include conventional plastics additives in an amount that is sufficient to obtain a desired processing or performance property for the compound, so long as there is resulting no light transmission percentage in the panel lower than the light transmission percentage of the polyvinyl halide and the visible light refracting particles.


The amount of any optional additive should not be wasteful of the additive or detrimental to the processing or performance of the compound. Those skilled in the art of thermoplastics compounding, without undue experimentation but with reference to such treatises as Plastics Additives Database (2004) from Plastics Design Library (www.elsevier.com), can select from many different types of additives for inclusion into the compounds of the present invention.


Non-limiting examples of optional additives include adhesion promoters; biocides (antibacterials, fungicides, and mildewcides), anti-fogging agents; anti-static agents; bonding, blowing and foaming agents; dispersants; fillers and extenders; fire and flame retardants and smoke suppressants; impact modifiers; initiators; lubricants; micas; pigments, colorants and dyes; plasticizers; processing aids; release agents; silanes, titanates and zirconates; slip and anti-blocking agents; stabilizers; stearates; ultraviolet light absorbers; viscosity regulators; waxes; and combinations of them.


Processing of the Polyvinyl Halide Compound


The preparation of compounds of the present invention is uncomplicated. The compound of the present invention can be made in batch or continuous operations, for later injection or compression molding, or extrusion. The selection of post-processing final shaping steps needs to be known at the time of formulating in order to select the preferred PVC grade, as explained above.


Mixing in a continuous process typically occurs in an extruder that is elevated to a temperature that is sufficient to melt the polymer matrix with addition either at the head of the extruder or downstream in the extruder of the solid ingredient additives. Extruder speeds can range from about 50 to about 500 revolutions per minute (rpm), and preferably from about 100 to about 300 rpm. Typically, the output from the extruder is pelletized for later extrusion or injection or compression molding into polymeric articles.


Mixing in a batch process typically occurs in a Banbury mixer that is also elevated to a temperature that is sufficient to melt the polymer matrix to permit addition of the solid ingredient additives of any optional additive. The mixing speeds range from 60 to 1000 rpm and temperature of mixing can be ambient. Also, the output from the mixer is chopped into smaller sizes, such as pellets or cubes, for later extrusion or injection or compression molding into polymeric articles.


Subsequent extrusion or injection or compression molding techniques are well known to those skilled in the art of thermoplastics polymer engineering. Any of compression molding, injection molding and extrusion can be performed on compounds of the present invention. While one should not expose the thermoplastic compounds to needless heat histories, the preparation of pellets or cubes of the PVC compound is suitable for efficient manufacturing. Without undue experimentation but with such references as “Extrusion, The Definitive Processing Guide and Handbook”; “Handbook of Molded Part Shrinkage and Warpage”; “Specialized Molding Techniques”; “Rotational Molding Technology”; and “Handbook of Mold, Tool and Die Repair Welding”, all published by Plastics Design Library (elsevier.com), one can make articles of any conceivable shape and appearance using compounds of the present invention.


Usefulness of the Invention


Any plastic article made by injection molding, compression molding, or extrusion is a candidate for use as an article having appreciably little porosity and good thermal conductivity properties.


Any end use article in need of flame retardance and good thermal management can benefit from use of the compounds of the present invention. LED lighting fixtures are particularly suitable for molded or extruded compounds disclosed herein.


Generally polymer compounds disclosed herein should have the following desired technical performances, as seen in Table 1.











TABLE 1





Properties

Target







Thermal conductivity
In-plane
at least 1.0


(W/(m · K))
Through-plane
at least 0.5


Processing:
Extrusion
Yes



Injection Molding
Yes



Compression Molding
Yes








Flammability (@ 1.5 mm-2.0 mm)
UL 5 VA


Impact (ft-lb/in @ 73° F.)
0.3-1.5


HDT (° C.) @ 66 psi
At least 65


Porosity
Approaching 0%


Actual Specific Gravity
1.50-1.75









EXAMPLES

Thermal Conductivity Test Method


For thermal conductivity testing, the samples were spray coated with DGF-123 dry graphite film spray (Miracle Power Products, Cleveland, Ohio USA) and tested in a Netzsch “Nanoflash LFA447” instrument, conforming to ASTM D1461-01 to determine the heat capacity and diffusivity. After measuring heat capacity and diffusivity, both in-plane and through-plane conductivity were calculated according to the following equation and reported in Watts per meter per Kelvin (W/(m·K)):

K=ρ*Cp*α

where


ρ is density (g/cm3)


Cp is heat capacity (J/g° C.)


α is diffusivity (mm2/s)


The experimental parameters used to collect the data were: temperature: 25° C., Filter: 100, Pulse: long, and Pre-amp and amp: 10×5002 and 10×2520.


Example A—Starting Rigid PVC Dry-Blend Powder Compound

All Examples and Comparative Examples below started with a rigid PVC compound, Example A, having the formulation seen in Table 2, which also includes the processing conditions of dry-blend powder compounding.










TABLE 2







Ingredient
Example A





SUSP RESIN 185 (PAS) (K: 56,
100


1V: 0.68) from OxyVinyls



Modified Dibutyl Tin Octyl
2.375


TG from Galata



STEARIC ACID as lubricant
0.2


from Emery Oleochemicals



CALCIUM STEARATE from
2


Emery Oleochemicals



EBS Wax Generic Lo TAV
2


used as lubricant from Lonza



Fully Refined Paraffin Wax 165
0.2


used as lubricant from Honeywell



PARALOID K120N processing
3


aid from Dow



KANEKA FM 40 impact
6.25


modifier from Kaneka



Total, PHR
116.025










Mixing Procedure











Equipment
Henschel mixer


Mixing speed, rpm
low speed


Order to addition of
PVC resin, stabilizer, lubricants,


Ingredients
processing aid and impact modifier


Drop Temperature, ° C.
73


Form of product
Free flowing powder









Table 3 shows the processing conditions for all Comparative Examples and Examples 2 through 18.









TABLE 3







Mixing and Milling Procedure











Mixing
for each formulation, mixed all ingredients



together in a 500 ml of glass container


Milling
Two roll mill with 0.125~0.135 in. gap


Rear Roll Temperature, ° F.
366 (185° C.)


Front Roll Temperature, ° F.
361 (183° C.)


Time on mill
until thoroughly well fused and mixed


Form of product
milled slabs to be compression molded



for sample testing










Compression Molding Sample Preparation Procedure











Sample for Thermal
6″ × 6″ × 0.125″ plaque


Conductivity and Specific
(15 × 15 × 0.32 cm)


Gravity Measurements



Equipment
150 Ton WABASH



18″ × 18″ (46 × 46 cm)


Sample thickness
0.125 inches (0.32 cm)


Heating platen Temperature,
365~370 (185-188° C.)


Top, ° F.



Heating platen Temperature,
365~370 (185-188° C.)


Bottom, ° F.



Pre-heat (cycle time, s)
5


Ramp (cycle time, s)
180


Hold (cycle time, s)
120


Cooling (cycle time, s)
900









Tables 4A and 4B show the formulations and test results of Comparative Example 1 and Examples 2-18, with Example 11 being most preferred because of good heat distortion temperature and good processability. In other words, having a higher ESO loading causes a lower HDT value. While in some circumstances ESO loading can be 0.5 wt. % or higher, it is desirable to be 1.0-4.5 wt. % with preference toward 1.0 wt. % if porosity is minimized.










TABLE 4A








Example

















Comp. 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9



















PVC Compound from Example A, %
53.7
56.3
51.3
43.6
37.9
74.4
51.3
51.3
51.3


Timrex 80 × 150 natural flake
46.3
38.8
44.2
52.6
58.8






graphite, %











Timrex C-Therm 011 synthetic flake





19.2
44.2




graphite, %











Timrex KS-150 synthetic spheroid







44.2



graphite, %











Timrex SFG-150 synthetic flake








44.2


graphite, %











Timrex KS-44 synthetic spheroid











graphite, %











Epoxidized soybean oil (ESO), %
0
4.9
4.5
3.8
3.3
6.4
4.4
4.5
4.5


Total Weight %
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100







Test Results
















In-plane thermal conductivity,
9.4
3.6
8.3
13.5
15.5
2.8
27.2
2.7
10.4


W/(m · K)











Through-plane thermal conductivity,
0.59
0.42
0.73
0.79
0.83
0.59
1.11
0.68
0.72


W/(m · K)











Milling Processability
Bad1
Good2
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good


Actual Specific Gravity
1.59
1.56
1.61
1.69
1.73
1.41
1.61
1.60
1.60


Porosity3, %
3
0
0
0
0
0.7
0
0
0






1Bad = Too difficult to be fused to form a milled slab with a lot of powdering materials falling off the two-roll mill during milling




2Good = Easily fused to form nicely milled slabs




3Porosity is calculated based on specific gravity and theoretical specific gravity which is typical for highly filled thermal plastic composite















TABLE 4B








Example

















10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18



















PVC Compound from Example A, %
51.3
53.0
51.3
51.3
51.3
51.3
51.3
62.4
62.4


Timrex 80 × 150 natural flake

45.6
22.1
22.1

8.8
22.1
16.1
21.5


graphite, %











Timrex C-Therm 011 synthetic





8.8
22.1
16.1
10.8


flake graphite, %











Timrex KS-150 synthetic spheroid



22.1
22.1
8.8





graphite, %











Timrex SFG-150 synthetic flake




22.1
8.8





graphite, %











Timrex KS-44 synthetic spheroid
44.2

22.1


8.8





graphite, %











Epoxidized soybean oil (ESO), %
4.5
1.4
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
5.4
5.4


Total Weight %
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100







Test Results
















In-plane thermal conductivity,
7.2
9.4
3.7
6.7
7.1
6.6
20
5.6
7.6


W/(m · K)











Through-plane thermal
0.87
0.57
0.60
0.80
0.70
0.77
1.26
0.75
0.46


conductivity, W/(m · K)











Milling Processability
Good2
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good


Actual Specific Gravity
1.61
1.63
1.61
1.61
1.59
1.61
1.61
1.50
1.51


Porosity3, %
0
0
0
0
0.3
0
0
0.2
0






2Good = Easily fused to form nicely milled slabs




3Porosity is calculated based on specific gravity and theoretical specific gravity which is typical for highly filled thermal plastic composite







Table 5 shows the processing conditions for Example 19, which used a Buss continuous mixer in replacement of the milling compounding used with respect to Examples 2-18 and Comparative Example 1.









TABLE 5





Buss Kneading Continuous Mixing and Compounding/Pelletizing


















Equipment
Henschel 150 liter mixer



Mixing speed, rpm
Very low speed



Order to addition of
Example A, ESO, and



Ingredients
graphite



Drop Temperature, F.
Until well mixed



Equipment
46 mm 20-25 Buss



ET RPM
17.5



KS RPM
165



KS AMPS
21



RS RPM
28



GS RPM
50



KS Screw Temperature, ° F.
270



KS Barrel Temperature, ° F.
290



RS Screw Temperature, ° F.
270



RS Barrel Temperature, ° F.
270



GS Screw Temperature, ° F.
340



GS Barrel Temperature, ° F.
350



Die Temperature, ° F.
360



Melt Temperature, ° F.
375



Product form
pellet










Table 6 shows the formulation and test results for Example 19.










TABLE 6





Example
19
















PVC Compound from Example A, wt. %
53.0


Timrex 80 × 150 natural flake graphite, wt. %
45.6


Epoxidized soybean oil (ESO), wt. %
1.4


Total Weight %
100







Test Results of the Injection Molded Sample








In-plane thermal conductivity, W/(m · K)
9.0


Through-plane thermal conductivity, W/(m · K)
1.7


Specific gravity, ASTM D792
1.63


Tensile strength (psi) (ASTM D638)
5899


Tensile modulus (ksi) (ASTM D638)
2034


Flexural strength (psi) (ASTM D790)
9678


Flexural modulus (ksi) (ASTM D790)
2077


Notched Izod impact (ft-Ib/in) (ASTM D256)
0.57


HDT (° C.) @ 264 psi, annealed (ASTM D648)
68


HDT (° C.) @ 66 psi, annealed (ASTM D648)
71


Coefficient of linear expansion, in/in/° F. (ASTM D696)
7.2 E−06









Flammability
UL 94
V-0 @




1.6 mm



UL 94
5 VA @









1.6 mm









Table 7 shows the processing conditions for Examples 20-22, which used a Banbury mixer followed by milling compounding in replacement of only Milling compounding used with respect to Examples 2-18 and Comparative Example 1.









TABLE 7







Banbury Mixing and Milling/Pelletizing











Equipment
Henschel 10 liter mixer


Mixing speed, rpm
Very low speed


Order to addition
Example A, ESO, and graphite


of Ingredients



Drop Temperature,
Until well mixed


F.



Form of product
Free flow powder


Equipment
Banbury


Mixing speed, rpm
66


Chamber temperature,
340


° F.



Drop Temperature,
325~330


° F.










Two Roll Mill with 0.14 in. gap











Rear Roll
340


Temperature, ° F.



Front Roll
350


Temperature, ° F.



Real Roll Mixing
17


speed, rpm



Front Roll Mixing
21


speed, rpm



Time on mill
Until thoroughly well fused and mixed


Form of product
cubes









Tables 8A-8C show the injection molding, extrusion, and compression molding conditions for each of Examples 20-22.









TABLE 8A





Injection Molding Conditions
















Equipment
85 T Van Dorn Molding machine


Rear Barrel Temperature, ° F.
345-360


Center Barrel Temperature, ° F.
355-370


Front Barrel Temperature, ° F.
365-380


Nozzle Barrel Temperature, ° F.
375-390


Screw Speed, rpm
70


Injection speed, in/sec
0.8


Injection pressure, psig
1645-2110


Short size, inch
2.9


Cushion, inch
0.320-0.225


Hold time, second
4


Cooling time, second
35
















TABLE 8B





Extrusion Conditions
















Equipment
A single Brabender with 2-inch die



and a compression ratio of 3:1 screw


Screw rpm
40


Zone 1 temperature, ° F. (° C.)
300 (149)


Zone 2 temperature, ° F. (° C.)
320 (160)


Zone 3 temperature, ° F. (° C.)
342 (172)


Die temperature, ° F. (° C.)
361 (183)
















TABLE 8C





Compression Molding Conditions
















For Thermal Conductivity and
6″ × 6″ × 0.125″ plaque


Specific Gravity Measurements
(15 × 15 × 0.32 cm)


Equipment
150 Ton WABASH 18″ × 18″



(46 × 46 cm)


Sample thickness
0.125 inches (0.32 cm)


Heating platen Temperature,
365~370 (185-188° C.)


Top, ° F.



Heating platen Temperature,
365~370 (185-188° C.)


Bottom, ° F.



Pre-heat (cycle time, s)
5


Ramp (cycle time, s)
180


Hold (cycle time, s)
120


Cooling (cycle time, s)
900









Table 9 shows the formulations and the test results for Examples 20-22 formulated and then final-shaped by the three different means of Tables 8A-8C.












TABLE 9





Example
20
21
22


















PVC Compound from Example A, wt. %
51.3
43.6
51.3


Timrex 80 × 150 natural flake graphite, wt. %
44.2
52.6
22.1


Timrex C-Therm 011 synthetic


22.1


flake graphite, wt. %





Epoxidized soybean oil (ESO), wt. %
4.5
3.8
4.5


Total Weight %
100
100
100







Test Results











In-plane thermal
Injection Molded
10.1
12.6
10.1


conductivity,
Extruded
9.7
10.2
10.7


W/(m · K)
Compression molded
8.3
13.5
20


Through-plane
Injection Molded
1.20
1.69
2.00


thermal conductivity,
Extruded
0.97
1.35
1.42


W/(m · K)
Compression molded
0.73
0.79
1.26


Specific gravity
Injection Molded
1.61
1.68
1.61



Extruded
1.59
1.67
1.61



Compression molded
1.61
1.69
1.61


Porosity, %
Injection molded
0
0
0



Extruded
0.6
0
0



Compression molded
0
0
0







Properties of the Injection Molded Samples










Tensile Modulus (ksi) (ASTM D638)
2225
3075
2554


Tensile Strength (psi) (ASTM D638)
5200
4726
5809


Flexural Modulus (ksi) (ASTM D790)
2370
2601
2624


Flexural Strength (psi) (ASTM D790)
9614
8633
10494


Notched Izod Impact (ft-lb/in) at 73° F.
0.52
0.47
0.34


(ASTM D256)





HDT (° C.) @ 264 psi (1.82 MPa), annealed
61
61
64


(ASTM D648)





HDT (° C.) @ 66 psi (0.45 MPa), annealed
64
66
69


(ASTM D648)









In Table 4A, Comparative Example 1 vs. Examples 2-5 and Comparative Example 1 vs. Examples 6-7 demonstrated that an increasing amount of thermally conductive graphite filler increased both in-plane and through-plane thermal conductivity with relatively constant amount of ESO coupling agent to PVC compound for Examples 2-5 and 6-7 with Comparative Example 1 having none. These results showed the ESO in compression molding conditions did not measurably alter the thermal conductivity but did help milling compounding process so as to minimize the porosity of the resulting compression molded plaques.


Examples 3 and 7-10, with constant amount of ESO coupling agent and a constant amount of graphite demonstrated that different types of graphite, natural vs. synthetic and flake vs. spheroid, did affect the thermal conductivity values both in-plane and through-plane measurements.


Examples 12-16 on the one hand and Examples 17-18 on the other hand with a constant amount of ESO and a constant total amount of graphite with combination of different type graphite, demonstrated that the combination of different type graphite also showed different thermal conductivity values both in-plane and through-plane as compared with using a single type of graphite.


Examples 3 and 11 with a relative constant amount of graphite to PVC compound (about 86%) but a difference in amount of ESO demonstrated that a smaller amount of ESO in the formulation of Example 11 was able to achieve both minimal porosity and also a higher in-plane thermal conductivity, though a lower through-plane conductivity.


Example 19 continued the exploration of a formulation with ESO at the lower end of the preferred range and the use of natural flake graphite. The physical properties of the originating PVC compound were maintained acceptably in view of the addition of both the graphite flake and the ESO.


Examples 20-22 measured both in-plane and through-plain thermal conductivities after final shaping by injection molding, extrusion, and compression molding. Examples 20 and 21 shared the use of natural flake graphite in different amounts, and Example 22 used the same combination of graphites as in Example 16.


For both in-plane and through-plane thermal conductivity results, injection molding out-performed extrusion or compression molding for Example 20.


Example 21 found compression molding to be unexpectedly superior for in-plane thermal conductivity over injection molding and extrusion, but not so for through-plane thermal conductivity.


It is noted that the difference between Examples 20 and 21 is only nine more weight percent of the same natural graphite flake.


Example 22 provided yet additional unpredicted results, with the graphite being contributed half and half, as was done in Example 16. The compression molded plaque had an in-plane thermal conductivity of 20 W/(m·K), near the sum of the compression molding, in-plane thermal conductivities for Examples 20 and 21 (20 vs. 8.3+13.5). Nearly the same effect was achieved for through-plane thermal conductivities: (1.26 vs. 0.73+0.79).


Table 9 also demonstrated substantial retention of physical properties of the PVC compound of Example A with minimal porosity because of the presence of the ESO coupling agent.


Finally, Table 9 reporting the formulations of Examples 20-22 and their thermal conductivity properties demonstrated the unexpected result that each of these three formulations can be shaped into any one of extrusion, compression molding, and injection molding. Thus, a single formulation or grade of a commercial product in pellet or cube form can be melted into final polymer article via any of the three shaping methods. If ESO were not present, as seen in Comparative Example 1 compared with Examples 2-22, the pelletization process could not be completed successfully even before molding and extrusion. If there were to be extrusion or injection molding, the resulting product would have such porosity that thermal conductivity would be lower. The ESO facilitates the practical elimination of voids during processing, pelletization, and final shaping. Without practical elimination of those voids, thermal conductivity would suffer.


The practical elimination of voids for the actual specific gravity to nearly match ideal specific gravity (a porosity of less than one percent) occurs in spite of the fact there is a large quantity of graphite being processed into the polyvinyl chloride resin to achieve the desired thermal conductivity in the final polymer article. The ratio of the amount of graphite to the amount of polyvinyl chloride resin can range from 0.22:1 to 1.33:1 (graphite:PVC resin) and preferably can range from 0.60:1 to 0.75:1. Each ratio for Examples 2-22 is calculated by dividing the weight percent of the graphite by the weight percent of the polyvinyl chloride polymer in 86% of the polymer compound into which the graphite is mixed, because the polymer resin is approximately 86% of the polymer compound, as calculated in Table 2. These high loadings of graphite for thermal conductivity reasons are successfully coupled into the PVC resin within minimal porosity because of the use of the epoxidized vegetable oil.


While all of the experiments have been conducted using ESO as the epoxidized vegetable oil for reasons of direct comparison logic, it is to be understood that any of the other epoxidized vegetable oils identified above are likely as capable as ESO of providing sufficient coupling for graphite to be loaded into PVC compounds at the weight percents exemplified above to achieve good processing and good ultimate thermal conductivity after final shaping.


By these observations and others utilizing the data of the Tables 4 and 9, one having ordinary skill in the art without undue experimentation can tailor the combination of types of graphite, the type of final shaping, and the amounts of graphite and ESO to achieve nearly any in-plane or thorough-plane thermal conductivity value within the range of results demonstrated above.


All documents cited in the Embodiments of the Invention are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety unless otherwise specified. The citation of any document is not to be construed as an admission that it is prior art with respect to the present invention.


While particular embodiments of the present invention have been illustrated and described, it would be obvious to those skilled in the art that various other changes and modifications can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. It is therefore intended to cover in the appended claims all such changes and modifications that are within the scope of the present invention.

Claims
  • 1. A polyvinyl halide compound having thermal conductivity, comprising: polyvinyl halide resin;natural or synthetic graphite of flake or spheroid form; andat least 0.5 and less than or equal to 6.4 weight percent of epoxidized vegetable oil;wherein the polyvinyl halide compound has a heat distortion temperature of at least 65° C. at 66 psi, measured according to ASTM D648.
  • 2. The polyvinyl halide compound of claim 1, wherein the polyvinyl halide compound comprises natural flake graphite.
  • 3. The polyvinyl halide compound of claim 1, wherein the polyvinyl halide resin comprises polyvinyl chloride.
  • 4. The polyvinyl halide compound of claim 3, wherein the amount of graphite present in the polyvinyl halide compound is from about 15 to about 65 weight percent of the polyvinyl halide compound.
  • 5. The polyvinyl halide compound of claim 3, wherein the amount of epoxidized vegetable oil present in the polyvinyl halide compound is from 1 to 6 weight percent of the polyvinyl halide compound.
  • 6. The polyvinyl halide compound of claim 5, wherein the epoxidized vegetable oil is epoxidized soybean oil.
  • 7. The polyvinyl halide compound of claim 5, wherein the polyvinyl halide compound also comprises at least one additive selected from the group consisting of adhesion promoters; biocides; anti-fogging agents; anti-static agents; bonding, blowing and foaming agents; dispersants; fillers and extenders; fire and flame retardants and smoke suppressants; impact modifiers; initiators; lubricants; micas; pigments, colorants and dyes; processing aids; release agents; silanes, titanates and zirconates; slip and anti-blocking agents; stabilizers; stearates; ultraviolet light absorbers; viscosity regulators; waxes; and combinations thereof.
  • 8. The polyvinyl halide compound of claim 1, wherein the graphite is selected from the group consisting of natural flake graphite, synthetic flake graphite, synthetic spheroid graphite, and combinations thereof.
  • 9. The polyvinyl halide compound of claim 8, wherein the amount of graphite present in the polyvinyl halide compound is from about 30 to about 55 weight percent of the polyvinyl halide compound.
  • 10. The polyvinyl halide compound of claim 1 in the form of an extruded polymer article, a compression molded polymer article, or an injection molded polymer article.
  • 11. A polymer article comprising the polyvinyl halide compound of claim 1.
  • 12. The polymer article of claim 11, wherein the polymer article has a porosity of less than one percent, wherein porosity is calculated based on specific gravity, measured according to ASTM D792, and theoretical specific gravity.
  • 13. The polymer article of claim 11, wherein the polymer article has a Notched Izod impact resistance of 0.3-1.5 ft-lb/in at 73° F. measured according to ASTM D256.
  • 14. The polyvinyl halide compound of claim 1, wherein the polyvinyl halide compound contains no copolymerized co-monomer or contains copolymerized co-monomer in an amount of less than 5 weight percent.
  • 15. The polyvinyl halide compound of claim 1, wherein the ratio of the amount of graphite to the amount of polyvinyl halide resin is from 0.22:1 to 1.33:1 by weight.
  • 16. The polyvinyl halide compound of claim 3, wherein the ratio of the amount of graphite to the amount of polyvinyl chloride resin is from 0.22:1 to 1.33:1 by weight.
  • 17. The polyvinyl halide compound of claim 16, wherein the polyvinyl halide compound contains no copolymerized co-monomer or contains copolymerized co-monomer in an amount of less than 5 weight percent.
  • 18. The polyvinyl halide compound of claim 2, wherein the polyvinyl halide compound further comprises synthetic flake graphite.
  • 19. The polyvinyl halide compound of claim 1, wherein the polyvinyl halide compound has an in plane thermal conductivity of greater than 1.0 W/(m*K), wherein in plane thermal conductivity is calculated from heat capacity and diffusivity measured according to ASTM D1461-01.
  • 20. A polyvinyl halide compound having thermal conductivity, comprising: polyvinyl halide resin;natural or synthetic graphite of flake or spheroid form; andat least 0.5 and less than or equal to 6.4 weight percent of epoxidized vegetable oil;wherein the polyvinyl halide compound has a Notched Izod impact resistance of 0.3-1.5 ft-lb/in at 73° F. measured according to ASTM D256.
  • 21. The polyvinyl halide compound of claim 20, wherein the polyvinyl halide compound comprises natural flake graphite.
  • 22. The polyvinyl halide compound of claim 21, wherein the polyvinyl halide compound further comprises synthetic flake graphite.
  • 23. The polyvinyl halide compound of claim 20, wherein the polyvinyl halide resin comprises polyvinyl chloride.
  • 24. The polyvinyl halide compound of claim 20, wherein the amount of graphite present in the polyvinyl halide compound is from about 15 to about 65 weight percent of the polyvinyl halide compound.
  • 25. The polyvinyl halide compound of claim 20, wherein the amount of epoxidized vegetable oil present in the polyvinyl halide compound is from 1 to 6 weight percent of the polyvinyl halide compound.
  • 26. The polyvinyl halide compound of claim 20, wherein the polyvinyl halide compound also comprises at least one additive selected from the group consisting of adhesion promoters; biocides; anti-fogging agents; anti-static agents; bonding, blowing and foaming agents; dispersants; fillers and extenders; fire and flame retardants and smoke suppressants; impact modifiers; initiators; lubricants; micas; pigments, colorants and dyes; processing aids; release agents; silanes, titanates and zirconates; slip and anti-blocking agents; stabilizers; stearates; ultraviolet light absorbers; viscosity regulators; waxes; and combinations thereof.
  • 27. The polyvinyl halide compound of claim 20, wherein the graphite is selected from the group consisting of natural flake graphite, synthetic flake graphite, synthetic spheroid graphite, and combinations thereof.
  • 28. The polyvinyl halide compound of claim 20, wherein the polyvinyl halide compound contains no copolymerized co-monomer or contains copolymerized co-monomer in an amount of less than 5 weight percent.
  • 29. The polyvinyl halide compound of claim 20, wherein the ratio of the amount of graphite to the amount of polyvinyl halide resin is from 0.22:1 to 1.33:1 by weight.
  • 30. A polyvinyl halide compound having thermal conductivity, comprising: polyvinyl halide resin;natural or synthetic graphite of flake or spheroid form; andat least 0.5 and less than or equal to 6.4 weight percent of epoxidized vegetable oil;wherein the polyvinyl halide compound contains essentially no additional plasticizer.
  • 31. The polyvinyl halide compound of claim 30, wherein the polyvinyl halide compound comprises natural flake graphite.
  • 32. The polyvinyl halide compound of claim 31, wherein the polyvinyl halide compound further comprises synthetic flake graphite.
  • 33. The polyvinyl halide compound of claim 30, wherein the polyvinyl halide resin comprises polyvinyl chloride.
  • 34. The polyvinyl halide compound of claim 30, wherein the amount of graphite present in the polyvinyl halide compound is from about 15 to about 65 weight percent of the polyvinyl halide compound.
  • 35. The polyvinyl halide compound of claim 30, wherein the amount of epoxidized vegetable oil present in the polyvinyl halide compound is from 1 to 6 weight percent of the polyvinyl halide compound.
  • 36. The polyvinyl halide compound of claim 30, wherein the polyvinyl halide compound also comprises at least one additive selected from the group consisting of adhesion promoters; biocides; anti-fogging agents; anti-static agents; bonding, blowing and foaming agents; dispersants; fillers and extenders; fire and flame retardants and smoke suppressants; impact modifiers; initiators; lubricants; micas; pigments, colorants and dyes; processing aids; release agents; silanes, titanates and zirconates; slip and anti-blocking agents; stabilizers; stearates; ultraviolet light absorbers; viscosity regulators; waxes; and combinations thereof.
  • 37. The polyvinyl halide compound of claim 30, wherein the graphite is selected from the group consisting of natural flake graphite, synthetic flake graphite, synthetic spheroid graphite, and combinations thereof.
  • 38. The polyvinyl halide compound of claim 30, wherein the polyvinyl halide compound contains no copolymerized co-monomer or contains copolymerized co-monomer in an amount of less than 5 weight percent.
  • 39. The polyvinyl halide compound of claim 30, wherein the ratio of the amount of graphite to the amount of polyvinyl halide resin is from 0.22:1 to 1.33:1 by weight.
CLAIM OF PRIORITY

This application is a national stage filing under 35 U.S.C. § 371 of International Patent Application Serial No. PCT/US2018/016623, filed Feb. 2, 2018, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/457,079, filed on Feb. 9, 2017, each of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.

PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/US2018/016623 2/2/2018 WO
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO2018/148116 8/16/2018 WO A
US Referenced Citations (48)
Number Name Date Kind
2883307 Orr, Jr. Apr 1959 A
2996489 Dannis et al. Aug 1961 A
3399104 Ball, III Aug 1968 A
4714665 Siegel Dec 1987 A
5244700 Banschick Sep 1993 A
5607764 Konno et al. Mar 1997 A
5939272 Buechler et al. Aug 1999 A
6846182 Sibner Jan 2005 B1
6878436 Reilly et al. Apr 2005 B2
6904154 Azima et al. Jun 2005 B2
7297380 Coenjarts et al. Nov 2007 B2
7338184 Chen et al. Mar 2008 B2
7344903 Erchak et al. Mar 2008 B2
7433565 Joseph et al. Oct 2008 B2
7582720 Rudiger et al. Sep 2009 B2
7809441 Kane et al. Oct 2010 B2
7922859 Rosenberger Apr 2011 B2
8415695 Lenk Apr 2013 B2
8499793 Park et al. Aug 2013 B2
8641214 Batchko Feb 2014 B1
8674390 Harris et al. Mar 2014 B2
8861072 Arsenault et al. Oct 2014 B2
8921827 Pickett et al. Dec 2014 B2
8981405 Lenk Mar 2015 B2
9304232 Chen et al. Apr 2016 B2
9575359 Theiste et al. Feb 2017 B2
20080194736 Lu Aug 2008 A1
20080218659 Kanaya et al. Sep 2008 A1
20090161221 Yang et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090256993 Oku Oct 2009 A1
20090279175 Laney et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090284970 Graf et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090316261 Garcia-Leiner et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100149644 Kogure et al. Jun 2010 A1
20110014298 Friel et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110042700 Lenk Feb 2011 A1
20110103021 Janssen et al. May 2011 A1
20110121196 Yeo et al. May 2011 A1
20110147614 Kane et al. Jun 2011 A1
20120083560 Lin et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120181489 Garcia-Leiner et al. Jul 2012 A1
20130229824 Jeoung et al. Sep 2013 A1
20140080951 Raman et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140178513 Matthews Jun 2014 A1
20150103557 Ayoub et al. Apr 2015 A1
20160377239 Kwong Dec 2016 A1
20180085977 Ezaki Mar 2018 A1
20190079219 Wu et al. Mar 2019 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (22)
Number Date Country
101977976 Feb 2011 CN
103554782 Feb 2014 CN
104327405 Feb 2015 CN
104534191 Apr 2015 CN
104558960 Apr 2015 CN
105218981 Jan 2016 CN
105670174 Jun 2016 CN
106496858 Mar 2017 CN
0 931 259 Jul 1999 EP
2751199 Jan 2017 EP
1196543 Jun 1970 GB
59-081349 May 1984 JP
2008-120848 May 2008 JP
2009-068019 Apr 2009 JP
2017-179008 Oct 2017 JP
10-2001-0080806 Aug 2001 KR
101355714 Jan 2014 KR
WO 9815825 Apr 1998 WO
WO 2016057420 Apr 2016 WO
WO 2016120760 Aug 2016 WO
WO 2016194361 Dec 2016 WO
WO 2019079194 Apr 2019 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (9)
Entry
Office Communication for CA App. No. 3,049,688 dated Aug. 27, 2020.
International Search and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2018/016623 dated May 16, 2018.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2018/016623 dated Aug. 13, 2019.
[No Author Listed], TSR9000 Spherical Silicone Resin. Momentive Performance Materials Inc. Copyright 2016-2019. 4 pages.
PCT/US2018/016623, May 16, 2018, International Search Report and Written Opinion.
PCT/US2018/016623, Aug. 13, 2019, International Preliminary Report on Patentability.
Office Communication for CN Application No. 201880010499.0 dated Feb. 23, 2021.
Office Action for CN Application No. 201880010499.9 dated Jan. 11, 2022.
Office Action for CN Application No. 201880010499.0 dated May 20, 2022.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20200002521 A1 Jan 2020 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
62457079 Feb 2017 US