THERMALLY EXPANDABLE RUBBER COMPOSITION

Abstract
A thermally expandable rubber composition, including at least one solid rubber, at least one processing oil, at least one vulcanization system, at least one filler G, 1.6-2.8 mM of 4,4′-oxybis(benzenesulfonyl hydrazide) and 7.0-12.5 mM of an aliphatic urea-derivative with a molecular weight of less than 250 g/mol, both based on 100 g of the rubber composition.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention relates to a thermally expandable rubber composition as well as a method of bonding substrates, especially in the automobile industry, or an article of white goods.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Manufactured products often contain hollow parts that result from the manufacturing process and/or that are designed into the product for various purposes, such as weight reduction. Automotive vehicles, for example, include several such hollow parts throughout the vehicle, including in the vehicle's roof, engine hood, trunk hood and in vehicle doors. It is often desirable to connect/bond the parts/substrates forming the hollow parts additionally at least at certain places so as to minimise vibrations and noise through such vibrations caused upon movement of the vehicle.


A suitable rubber composition to connect these parts/substrates for vibration reduction is able to expand its volume when heat is applied in order to increase its flexibility and to reduce alterations of the surface on the bonded parts also called “read-through” for aesthetic reasons. For example, during the manufacture process of a vehicle, the hollow parts of a vehicle's roof can contain applied beads of an uncured rubber composition between roof beam and the roof layer and can still be largely covered by an electro-coating liquid while applied beads of an uncured rubber composition between upper and the lower roof layer are already inserted, and afterwards during a heat treatment step, the expandable rubber composition expands and firmly connects the two layers in order to minimise vibrations and noise through such vibrations caused upon movement of the vehicle.


Specific material properties of the cured adhesive are of fundamental importance with respect to the mentioned bond line read through (BLRT) phenomenon. Adhesive BLRT is a visible distortion of the substrate over a cured adhesive bond-line. The deformations are primarily the result of a difference in the thermal expansion coefficients between the substrate and the adhesive. With the ongoing trend of light weighting in the automotive industry (e.g.) more and more thinner sheet metals are used for car manufacturing. With decreasing steel thickness and bending stiffness BLRT effects, caused by the rubber composition, occur more frequently. Therefore, BLRT optimized rubber based adhesive compositions are inquired more and more.


It is thus desirable to obtain a thermally expandable rubber composition advantageous in terms of a sufficiently expanded bead and a reduced shrinkage, which both are related with the BLRT performance.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

It is an object of the present invention to provide a thermally expandable rubber composition that provides a reduced BLRT phenomenon.


Surprisingly, the present invention provides a solution to that problem by providing a rubber composition, comprising

    • a) at least one solid rubber A from the group consisting of styrene-butadiene rubber, cis-1,4-polybutadiene, synthetic isoprene rubber, natural rubber, ethylene-propylene-diene rubber (EPDM), nitrile rubber, butyl rubber and acrylic rubber;
    • b) at least one processing oil PO;
    • c) at least one vulcanization system VS;
    • d) at least one filler G;
    • e) 1.6-2.8 mM of 4,4′-oxybis(benzenesulfonyl hydrazide) BA, based on 100 g of the rubber composition;
    • f) 7.0-12.5 mM of an aliphatic urea-derivative UR with a molecular weight of less than 250 g/mol, based on 100 g of the rubber composition.


The composition according to the present invention is particularly suitable to be used in sound dampening/vibration reduction, for example in automotive applications. Further aspects of the present invention are subject of other independent claims. Preferred embodiments of the invention are subject of dependent claims.







DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The unit term “wt.-%” means percentage by weight, based on the weight of the respective total composition, if not otherwise specified. The terms “weight” and “mass” are used interchangeably throughout this document.


Volume changes on the thermally expandable material are determined using the DIN EN ISO 1183 method of density measurement (Archimedes principle) in deionised water in combination with sample mass determined by a precision balance.


The present invention comprises a) at least one solid rubber A from the group consisting of styrene-butadiene rubber, cis-1,4-polybutadiene, synthetic isoprene rubber, natural rubber, ethylene-propylene-diene rubber (EPDM), nitrile rubber, butyl rubber and acrylic rubber.


Preferred solid rubbers have a molecular weight of 100′000 g/mol or more.


Preferably the at least one solid rubber A contains a styrene-butadiene rubber A1.


Preferably, the styrene-butadiene rubber A1 is an emulsion-polymerized SBR rubber. These can be divided into two types, cold rubber and hot rubber depending on the emulsion polymerization temperature, but hot rubbers (hot type) are preferred.


Preferably, the styrene-butadiene rubber A1 has a styrene content of from 1 to 60% by weight, preferably from 2 to 50% by weight, from 10 to 40% by weight, from 20 to 40% by weight, most preferred 20 to 30% by weight.


Particularly preferred pre-crosslinked styrene-butadiene elastomer are Petroflex™ SBR 1009A, 1009S and 1018 elastomers, manufactured by Petroflex, Brasil, using either rosin or fatty acids soaps as emulsifier and coagulated by the salt-acid method, and SBR 1009, 1009A and 4503 elastomers, manufactured by ISP Corporation, Texas, USA, by hot emulsion polymerization with divinylbenzene.


Preferred styrene-butadiene rubber A1 have a Mooney viscosity (ML 1+4 at 100° C.) of 40-150 MU (Mooney units), preferably 40-100 MU, 55-80 MU. Preferably, Mooney viscosity refers to the viscosity measure of rubbers. It is defined as the shearing torque resisting rotation of a cylindrical metal disk (or rotor) embedded in rubber within a cylindrical cavity. The dimensions of the shearing disk viscometer, test temperatures, and procedures for determining Mooney viscosity are defined in ASTM D1646.


Preferably the at least one solid rubber A contains a cis-1,4-polybutadiene A2.


Preferred cis-1,4-polybutadiene A2 have a cis-1,4-content greater than 90% by weight, preferably greater than 95% by weight.


Preferred cis-1,4-polybutadiene A2 have a Mooney viscosity (ML 1+4 at 100° C.) of 20-80 MU (Mooney units), preferably 20-60 MU, 30-50 MU.


Preferably, Mooney viscosity refers to the viscosity measure of rubbers. It is defined as the shearing torque resisting rotation of a cylindrical metal disk (or rotor) embedded in rubber within a cylindrical cavity. The dimensions of the shearing disk viscometer, test temperatures, and procedures for determining Mooney viscosity are defined in ASTM D1646.


It is especially preferred if the at least one solid rubber A is selected from styrene-butadiene rubber A1 and cis-1,4-polybutadiene A2.


It is especially preferred if the at the least one solid rubber A contains both styrene-butadiene rubber A1 and cis-1,4-polybutadiene A2.


Preferably, the weight ratio between styrene-butadiene rubber A1 and cis-1,4-polybutadiene A2 is from 4:1-1:2, preferably from 3:1-1:1, most preferably from 2.5:1-1.5:1.


Preferably, the total amount of the at least one solid rubber A is between 5 and 30 wt-%, preferably between 7.5 and 20 wt-%, most preferred between 7.5 and 12.5 wt-%, based on the total weight of the rubber composition.


The present invention comprises b) at least one processing oil PO.


Preferably, the processing oil PO is a processing oil compromising a naphthenic processing oil PO1 and a paraffinic processing oil PO2.


Preferably, the total amount of the processing oil PO is between 20 and 50 wt-%, preferably between 20 and 40 wt-%, most preferably between 25 and 35 wt-%, based on the total weight of the rubber composition.


Preferably the weight ratio between the sum of processing oil PO and the sum of the solid rubber A (PO/solid rubber A) is from 1.8-5.5, 2.3-5.5, 2.6-5.0, 3.0-4.5, preferably from 3.25-4.0, most preferably from 3.4-4.0.


The rubber composition comprises c) at least one vulcanization system VS.


A large number of vulcanization systems based on elementary sulfur as well as vulcanization systems not containing elementary sulfur are suitable.


If a vulcanization system based on elementary sulfur is used, a system containing pulverulent sulfur is preferred. Such a vulcanization system preferably consists of 1 wt. % to 15 wt. %, preferably 5 wt. % to 10 wt. %, of pulverulent sulfur.


Preferably, vulcanization systems without elementary sulfur compounds are used.


These vulcanization systems without elementary sulfur include vulcanization systems based on organic peroxides, polyfunctional amines, quinones, p-benzoquinone dioxime, p-nitrosobenzene and dinitrosobenzene, as well as vulcanization systems crosslinked with (blocked) diisocyanates.


Preferably, these vulcanization systems with or without elementary sulfur can further comprise organic vulcanization accelerators as well as zinc compounds.


Organic vulcanization accelerators that are suitable include the dithiocarbamates (in the form of their ammonium or metal salts), xanthogenates, thiuram compounds (monosulfides and disulfides), thiazole compounds, aldehyde-amine accelerators (e.g. hexamethylenetetramine) as well as guanidine accelerators, most particularly preferred being dibenzothiazyl disulfide (MBTS).


These organic accelerators are used in amounts of between 0.5 and 3 wt. %, referred to the overall rubber composition.


Zinc compounds acting as vulcanization accelerators may be selected from zinc salts of fatty acids, zinc dithiocarbamates, basic zinc carbonates as well as, in particular particulate zinc oxide. The content of zinc compounds is preferably in the range between 0.5 and 3 wt. %, 1 and 3 wt. %, based on the overall rubber composition.


Preferably, the vulcanization system VS is a vulcanization system without elementary sulfur, preferably containing p-benzoquinone dioxime, that further comprises organic vulcanization accelerators, preferably dibenzothiazyl disulfide, as well as zinc compounds, preferably zinc oxide. Preferably such a vulcanization system is present in an amount of 1 and 8 wt.-%, preferably 2 and 7 wt.-%, more preferably 3 and 6 wt.-%, based on the weight of the overall rubber composition.


The rubber composition comprises d) at least one filler G.


Suitable as fillers are, e.g., ground or precipitated calcium carbonate, lime, calcium-magnesium carbonate, talcum, gypsum, graphite, barite, silica, silicates, mica, wollastonite, carbon black, or the mixtures thereof, or the like.


Preferably the filler G is selected from ground calcium carbonate, precipitated calcium carbonate and lime.


Preferably, the total amount of the at least one filler G is between 30 and 60 wt-%, preferably between 35 and 55 wt-%, most preferably between 40 and 50 wt-%, based on the total weight of the rubber composition. In case the amount is more than 60 wt-% the viscosity might increase too much. An amount of less than 30 wt-% leads to a reduction in in sag resistance.


The rubber composition comprises:

    • e) 1.6-2.8 mM of 4,4′-oxybis(benzenesulfonyl hydrazide) BA, based on 100 g of the rubber composition.


35 Preferably, the amount of 4,4′-oxybis(benzenesulfonyl hydrazide) BA is 1.8-2.4 mM, more preferably 1.9-2.2 mM, based on 100 g of the rubber composition.


Surprisingly, it was found that an amount of less than 1.6 mM is disadvantageous in that the BLRT performance is no longer sufficient as a result. This can be seen, for example, in Examples E6 and E8. An amount greater than 2.8 mM is disadvantageous in that it means that the corrosion resistance, the adhesion to the substrate and the surface structure of the cured composition are no longer sufficient.


The rubber composition comprises:

    • f) 7.0-12.5 mM of an aliphatic urea-derivative UR with a molecular weight of less than 250 g/mol, based on 100 g of the rubber composition.


Preferably, the amount of the aliphatic urea-derivative UR with a molecular weight of less than 250 g/mol is 8.0-11.0 mM, more preferably 9.0-10.5 mM, based on 100 g of the rubber composition.


Surprisingly it was found that an amount of less than 7.0 mM is disadvantageous in that the BLRT performance is no longer sufficient as a result. This can be seen, for example, in Examples E2, E5, E6 and E8. An amount greater than 12.5 mM is disadvantageous in that it means that the adhesion to the substrate and the surface structure of the cured composition are no longer sufficient.


Preferably, the aliphatic urea-derivative UR with a molecular weight of less than 250 g/mol is selected from the group consisting of urea, N-methyl urea, N,N-dimethyl urea, N,N′-dimethyl urea, N,N,N′-trimethyl urea, N,N,N′,N′-tetramethyl urea, and derivates of those where some or all methyl groups are ethyl or propyl groups instead. More preferably it is selected from the group consisting of urea, N-methyl urea, N,N-dimethyl urea, N,N′-dimethyl urea, N,N,N′-trimethyl urea, N,N,N′,N′-tetramethyl urea.


Most preferably, the aliphatic urea-derivative UR with a molecular weight of less than 250 g/mol is urea (also called carbonyl diamide).


Preferably, the molar ratio between the aliphatic urea-derivative UR with a molecular weight of less than 250 g/mol and the 4,4′-oxybis(benzenesulfonyl hydrazide) BA (UR/BA) is 2.5-7.5, preferably 3.5-6.5, more preferably 4.5-5.5. This is advantageous for an improved BLRT performance.


Surprisingly it was found that if the above-mentioned aliphatic urea-derivative UR was replaced with triethylamine or triisopropanolamine, an improved BLRT performance could not be obtained as visible for example in Examples E9-E11.


It is further preferred that the weight ratio of solid rubber A to 4,4′-oxybis(benzenesulfonyl hydrazide) BA (A/BA) is from 10-18, preferably 12-17, more preferably 12.5-14.5. This ratio is advantageous for an improved BLRT performance.


Known blowing agents in the state of the art may be a chemical or physical blowing agents. Chemical blowing agents are organic or inorganic compounds that decompose under influence of, e.g., temperature or humidity, while at least one of the formed decomposition products is a gas. Physical blowing agents include, but are not limited to, compounds that become gaseous at a certain temperature. Thus, both chemical and physical blowing agents are suitable to cause an expansion in thermally expandable compositions.


Preferably, the rubber composition contains less than 5 wt.-% of chemical or physical blowing agents other than 4,4′-oxybis(benzenesulfonyl hydrazide) BA, based on the total weight of the rubber composition. More preferably, the rubber composition contains less than 2 wt.-%, less than 1 wt.-%, less than 0.5 wt.-%, less than 0.1 wt.-%, less than 0.01 wt.-%, most preferably 0 wt.-%, of chemical or physical blowing agents other than 4,4′-oxybis(benzenesulfonyl hydrazide) BA, based on the total weight of the rubber composition.


Apart from the essential ingredients, the present inventive rubber composition may contain other components commonly used in such compositions and known to the ordinarily skilled artisan in the field. These include, for example colorants, adhesion promoters, antioxidants and the like.


The rubber composition preferably has a viscosity of 30 to 3000 Pas at 45° C., preferably from 150 to 600 Pas at 45° C.


The viscosity is measured according to DIN 54458 with an oscillational/rotational rheometer by oscillographic means using a rheometer having a heatable plate (MCR 301, AntonPaar) with the following settings: gap 1 mm, plane spindle diameter: 25 mm, deformation 0.05% at 10 Hz, parameter set for A1 static state viscosity according to DIN 54458.


The cured rubber composition preferably has a volume increase compared to the uncured composition of between 50-120%, preferably 60-90%, most preferred 60-75%. Preferably the volume increase is determined using the DIN EN ISO 1183 method of density measurement (Archimedes principle) in deionised water in combination with sample mass determined by a precision balance.


Preferably the values for volume increase (expansion) are determined as mentioned in the experimental section.


The compositions according to the present inventions can be manufactured by mixing the components in any suitable mixing apparatus, e.g. in a dispersion mixer, planetary mixer, double screw mixer, continuous mixer, extruder, or dual screw extruder.


Preferably, the at least one solid rubber A and the processing oil PO Are mixed in a separate step using a kneader, preferably a sigma blade kneader until a homogenous mixture is obtained. This homogenous mixture is then preferably mixed with the remaining components of the rubber composition in the suitable mixing apparatus mentioned above.


It may be advantageous to heat the components before or during mixing, either by applying external heat sources or by friction generated by the mixing process itself, in order to facilitate processing of the components into a homogeneous mixture by decreasing viscosities and/or melting of individual components. However, care has to be taken, e.g. by temperature monitoring and use of cooling devices where appropriate, not to exceed the activation temperatures of the oxybis(benzenesulfonylhydrazide) BA and/or vulcanization system VS.


A further aspect of the present invention relates to a method of bonding substrates, especially metal substrates, comprising the steps of

    • a) applying a rubber composition of the invention as defined above to a first substrate, especially a metal substrate, more preferably an oiled metal substrate;
    • b) contacting the rubber composition applied with a second substrate, especially a metal substrate, more preferably an oiled metal substrate, to form an adhesive bond; and
    • c) curing the rubber composition in the adhesive bond at a temperature in the range from 150 to 200° C.


The first and/or second substrate, especially metal substrate, may each be used as such or as part of an article, i.e. of an article comprising the first or second substrate, especially metal substrate. Preferably, the substrates, especially metal substrates, more preferably oiled metal substrates, are used as such. The first and second substrates, especially metal substrates, may be made from the same or different materials.


The first and/or second substrates are preferably metal substrates. If appropriate, however, heat-resistant plastics, are also conceivable as first and/or second substrate.


Suitable first and/or second metal substrates are in principle all the metal substrates known to the person skilled in the art, especially in the form of a sheet, as utilized, for example, in the construction of modes of transport, for example in the automobile industry, or in the production of white goods. Preferably these metal substrates are oiled substrates meaning they are covered with corrosion protection oils known to the person skilled in the art. An example of such a corrosion protection oil is Anticorit PL 3802-39S.


Examples of the first and/or second metal substrate are metal substrates, especially sheets, of steel, especially electrolytically galvanized steel, hot-dip galvanized steel, bonazinc-coated steel, and subsequently phosphated steel, and also aluminium, especially in the variants that typically occur in automaking, and also magnesium or magnesium alloys. Preferably the substrates are oiled substrates.


The rubber composition is applied to the first substrate, especially metal substrate, in step (a) of the method of the invention. This is effected, for example, at an application temperature of the rubber composition of 10° C. to 80° C., preferably of 25° C. to 50° C., more preferably of 30 to 40° C. The application is preferably effected in the form of a bead. Automatic application is preferred.


The rubber composition can be applied over the entire surface or over part of the surface of the first substrate, especially metal substrate. In a typical application, the rubber composition can be applied, for example, only on a part, preferably less than 20%, less than 10%, less than 5%, preferably less than 2%, of the surface of the substrate facing the second substrate.


In a further step, the rubber composition applied to the first substrate, especially metal substrate, is contacted with the second substrate, especially metal substrate, in order to form an adhesive bond.


To cure the rubber composition in the adhesive bond, the rubber composition is heated to a temperature in the range from 150 to 180° C., 150 to 170° C., preferably 150 to 160° C., most preferably 160° C. The heating can be effected, for example, by means of infrared radiation or induction heating or in an oven, for example a cathodic electrocoating oven. In this way, the adhesive bond with the rubber composition is obtained.


Preferably the duration of said heating step is from 10-60 min, preferably 10-40 min, 10-30 min, most preferably 10-20 min.


The rubber composition in the adhesive bond can be cured in one step, but curing in two or more steps is also possible, in which case intermediate operating steps between or during the curing steps are possible, for example a wash and/or a dip-coating operation, for example a cathodic electrocoating operation, of one or both substrates, especially metal substrates, with a subsequent wash.


The rubber composition of the invention and the method of the invention are especially suitable for bonding of substrates, especially metal substrates, for the manufacture of modes of transport, especially automobiles, buses, trucks, rail vehicles, ships or aircraft, or white goods, especially washing machines, tumble dryers or dishwashers, or parts thereof, preferably motor vehicles or installable components thereof.


Hence another aspect of the present invention is an article obtained from said method, especially a construction of modes of transport, especially in the automobile industry, or an article of white goods.


Hence another aspect of the present invention is the use of the rubber composition as described above for bonding of substrates, especially metal substrates, for the manufacture of modes of transport, especially automobiles, buses, trucks, rail vehicles, ships or aircraft, or white goods, especially washing machines, tumble dryers or dishwashers, or parts thereof, especially to reduce vibrations and noise through such vibrations caused upon movement of the bonded substrates.


Preferably the oxybis(benzenesulfonylhydrazide) BA has the preferred features and/or ratios as mentioned before. It is further preferred that the curing of the rubber composition was performed at mentioned temperature for 10-60 min, preferably 10-40 min, 10-30 min, most preferably 10-20 min.


The invention is further explained in the following experimental part which, however, shall not be construed as limiting the scope of the invention.


Examples
Chemicals Used for Formulating Rubber Compositions:










TABLE 1





Ingredient
Description







Solid rubber
styrene-butadiene rubber, solid, Mooney viscosity 55-80


A1
(ML 1 + 4 at 100° C., ASTM D1646), styrene content 20-



30%


Solid rubber
cis-1,4-polybutadiene, solid, Mooney viscosity 30-50


A2
(ML 1 + 4 at 100° C., ASTM D1646), cis-1,4-content



greater than 95%


Naphthenic
CAS: 64742-52-5, Distillates (petroleum) hydrotreated


processing oil
heavy naphthenic


PO1



Paraffinic
CAS No. 64742-65-0, Solvent-dewaxed heavy paraffinic


processing oil
distillate


PO2



CaCO3,
natural ground calcium carbonate


natural



CaCO3,
precipitated calcium carbonate


precipitated



Lime
Lime, ground


Vulcanisation
Mixture comprising p-benzoquinone dioxime, 2,2′-


system VS
dibenzothiazyl disulfide and zinc oxide in powder form.


OBSH BA
Blowing agent, 4,4′-oxybis(benzenesulfonyl hydrazide)



(OBSH, Mw. 358.39 g · mol−1 CAS No. 80-51-3)


Urea UR
Urea, (Carbonyl diamide, Mw. 60.056 g · mol−1, CAS



No. 57-13-6)


TEA
Triethylamine (N, N-Diethylethanamine,



Mw. 101.193 g. mol−1, CAS No. 121-44-8)


TIPA
Triisopropanolamine (1,1′,1″-Nitrilotri(propan-2-ol),



Mw. 191.271 g · mol−1, CAS No. 122-20-3)









All inventive (E3, E4 and E7) and non-inventive (E1, E2, E5-E6 and E8-E11) example compositions shown in table 2 were prepared according to the following procedure:


In a first step, the solid rubber A1 and solid rubber A2 were mixed in a sigma blade kneader for 15 min. After that, the processing oils were added constantly over a time of 5 hours. After this, the obtained mixture is blended with all the remaining components by using a lab scale mixer (Speedmixer®) (total weight of the final composition approximately 350 g) and mixed during 5 min (total). The mixed rubber compositions were then stored in sealed cartridges.









TABLE 2







the molar amount, based on 100 g of the rubber composition, of OBSH BA, Urea UR, TEA and TIPA respectively,


are shown in brackets, e.g. “(4.4)” indicates “4.4 mM, based on 100 g of the rubber composition”.









Composition


















Ingredient (in weight-parts)
E1
E2
E3
E4
E5
E6
E7
E8
E9
E10
E11





















Solid rubber A1
6.4
6.4
6.4
6.4
6.4
6.4
6.4
6.4
6.4
6.4
6.4


Solid rubber A2
3.6
3.6
3.6
3.6
3.6
3.6
3.6
3.6
3.6
3.6
3.6


Naphthenic processing oil PO1
18.8
18.8
18.8
18.8
18.8
18.8
18.8
18.8
18.8
18.8
18.8


Paraffinic processing oil PO2
18.8
18.8
18.8
18.8
18.8
18.8
18.8
18.8
18.8
18.8
18.8


CaCO3, natural
32.66
32.4
32.18
32.06
32.28
32.53
32.33
32.43
31.86
32.36
31.86


CaCO3, precipitated
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10


Lime
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4


Vulcanisation system
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5


OBSH BA
0.74
0.74
0.74
0.74
0.74
0.48
0.59
0.53
0.74
0.74
0.74



(2.06)
(2.06)
(2.06)
(2.06)
(2.06)
(1.35)
(1.64)
(1.48)
(2.06)
(2.06)
(2.06)


Urea UR
0
0.26
0.48
0.60
0.38
0.39
0.48
0.44



(0)
(4.4)
(8.1)
(10)
(6.2)
(6.5)
(8.0)
(7.3)


TEA








0.8
0.3











(7.9)
(3.0)


TIPA










0.8













(4.2)


Sum (weight-parts)
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100


Molar Ratio (UR/BA)

2.12
3.91
4.84
3.02
4.85
4.90
4.90





Wt.-Ratio Solid rubber/
13.5
13.5
13.5
13.5
13.5
20.8
16.9
18.9
13.5
13.5
13.5


Blowing agent (A/BA)



























TABLE 3





Composition
E1
E2
E3
E4
E5
E6
E7
E8
E9
E10
E11


























Bond Line Read-
4
3
2
1
3
3
2
3
4
4
4


Through BLRT













Expansion (%)
55
58.2
68.9
80.2
76.8
51.4
56.2
55.3
n.d.
53
n.d.





n.d. = not determined






Determination of Expansion

The volume increase is determined using the DIN EN ISO 1183 method of density measurement (Archimedes principle) in deionised water in combination with sample mass determined by a precision balance.


Determination of Read-Through

The compositions were applied as a single bead (50 mm length, 12 mm diameter, doctor knife application) in the center of a test specimen (steel EG (DC06+ZE 75/75), thickness 0.25 mm, 150×105 mm). The specimen was than fixed in a special frame and a thin and only one side-painted steel sheet (DC01 C590 0.25 mm) was put on top of the other specimen (non-painted side wetted by the bead applied composition) with a distance of 4.5 mm (use of Teflon® spacer). Both sheet metals were fixed at the outer edges by screwing the frame segments together. The test specimen was then put into an oven at 250° C. for 20 min, and kept there for further 18 min at reduced heating at 220° C. After cooling to 23° C., the upper side of the specimen (white painted sheet metal surface) was analyzed with a deflectometer. The complete specimen is placed inside the deflectometer chamber and the white painted steel surface is illuminated by a periodic pattern of parallel white and black lines. A camera records the pattern reflected by the white sheet metal surface. By computational post processing of the data (filtering and profile extraction) a potential distortion can be visualized.


The obtained curvature profile was then compared with the result obtained by using a bead consisting of a commercial state of the art product as reference. Compositions with a curvature profile similar, respectively slightly better, in terms of BLRT-performance than the one obtained with the reference composition were labeled with a rating of “4” or “3” respectively. Compositions with a significantly improved curvature profile (very little bond-line-read-through detectable or no significant bond-line-read-through detectable) compared to the one obtained with the reference were labeled with a rating of “2” or “1” respectively.


The values for the read-through and the volume expansion are shown in Table 3.


The molar ratio of the urea UR to the oxybis(benzenesulfonylhydrazide) BA is shown in Table 2 as “Molar Ratio (UR/BA)”.


The weight ratio of solid rubber A to oxybis(benzenesulfonylhydrazide) BA is shown in Table 2 as “Wt.-Ratio Solid rubber/OBSH (A/BA)”.

Claims
  • 1. A rubber composition, comprising a) at least one solid rubber from the group consisting of styrene-butadiene rubber, cis-1,4-polybutadiene, synthetic isoprene rubber, natural rubber, ethylene-propylene-diene rubber (EPDM), nitrile rubber, butyl rubber and acrylic rubber;b) at least one processing oil;c) at least one vulcanization system;d) at least one filler;e) 1.6-2.8 mM of 4,4′-oxybis(benzenesulfonyl hydrazide), based on 100 g of the rubber composition;f) 7.0-12.5 mM of an aliphatic urea-derivative with a molecular weight of less than 250 g/mol, based on 100 g of the rubber composition.
  • 2. The rubber composition according to claim 1, wherein the amount of 4,4′-oxybis(benzenesulfonyl hydrazide) is 1.8-2.4 mM based on 100 g of the rubber composition.
  • 3. The rubber composition according to claim 1, wherein the amount of the aliphatic urea-derivative with a molecular weight of less than 250 g/mol is 8.0-11.0 mM based on 100 g of the rubber composition.
  • 4. The rubber composition according to claim 1, wherein the aliphatic urea-derivative with a molecular weight of less than 250 g/mol is selected from the group consisting of urea, N-methyl urea, N,N-dimethyl urea, N,N′-dimethyl urea, N,N,N′-trimethyl urea, N,N,N′,N′-tetramethyl urea, and derivates of those where some or all methyl groups are ethyl or propyl groups instead.
  • 5. The rubber composition according to claim 4, wherein the aliphatic urea-derivative with a molecular weight of less than 250 g/mol is urea.
  • 6. The rubber composition according to claim 1, wherein the molar ratio between the aliphatic urea-derivative with a molecular weight of less than 250 g/mol and the 4,4′-oxybis(benzenesulfonyl hydrazide) is 2.5-7.5.
  • 7. The rubber composition according to claim 1, wherein the weight ratio of solid rubber to 4,4′-oxybis(benzenesulfonyl hydrazide) is from 10-18.
  • 8. The rubber composition according to claim 1, wherein the at least one solid rubber is selected from styrene-butadiene rubber and cis-1,4-polybutadiene.
  • 9. The rubber composition according to claim 1, wherein the total amount of the at least one solid rubber is between 5 and 30 wt-% based on the total weight of the rubber composition.
  • 10. The rubber composition according to claim 1, wherein the at least one processing oil comprising a naphthenic processing oil and a paraffinic processing oil.
  • 11. The rubber composition according to claim 1, wherein the weight ratio between the sum of the processing oil and the sum of the solid rubber is from 1.8-5.5, 2.3-5.5, 2.6-5.0, 3.0-4.5.
  • 12. The rubber composition according to claim 1, wherein the at least one vulcanization system is a vulcanization system without elementary sulfur that further comprises organic vulcanization accelerators as well as zinc compounds.
  • 13. A method of bonding substrates, comprising the steps of a) applying a rubber composition according to claim 1 to a first substrate;b) contacting the rubber composition applied with a second substrate, to form an adhesive bond; andc) curing the rubber composition in the adhesive bond at a temperature in the range from 150 to 200° C.
  • 14. An article obtained from the method of claim 13.
  • 15. A method for the manufacture of modes of transport or white goods, comprising bonding substrates using the rubber composition according to claim 1.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
21202435.0 Oct 2021 EP regional
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/EP2022/077080 9/29/2022 WO