This invention relates to thermodynamic cycles and useful expansion machines.
The PCT documents SE 2012 050 319 and SE 2013/051 059 (assigned to Climeon AB) disclose a novel thermodynamic cycle using CO2 gas as working fluid and alkaline liquids (amines) as temporary and reversible CO2 absorbents. CO2 is liberated from CO2-saturated amines in the hot section (e.g. 90° C.), generating 1-10 bar pressure, and, following expansion through a turbine, absorbed by non-saturated amine in the cold section of the process. The steady-state pressure in the cold section is significantly below atmospheric pressure such that pressure ratios between the hot and cold side of the process between 25 and 4 can be realized. Variations and improvements are disclosed in SE 1300 576-4, SE 1400 027-7 and SE 1400 160-6, all assigned to Climeon, hereby incorporated by reference.
General background relating to expansion machines is found in the following disclosures and references:
Moustapha, Zelesky, Baines & Japikse, “Axial and radial turbines”, Concepts NREC, 2003, ISBN 0-933283, see especially FIG. 8.19. Japikse & Baines, “Introduction to turbomachinery”. Balje O., “Turbomachines—A Guide to Design Selection and Theory”, 1981, ISBN 0-471-06036-4.
Among patent disclosures, EP 2 669 473 (Mitsubishi, 2012) and US 2013/0280 036 (Honeywell) are recent examples of technological progress in the construction of radial turbines. U.S. Pat. No. 5,408,747 (United Technologies Corp., 1994) describes a CFD approach to the design of radial-inflow turbines.
Regarding the removal of condensing liquids from the turbine during the expansion, the following disclosures are of general interest: EP 2092 165 by ABB (2007), EP 2128 386 by Siemens (2008), EP 1925 785 by Siemens (2006), EP 1103 699 by Mitsubishi (2007), EP 0812 378 by Joel H. Rosenblatt (1995). The latter publication discloses the management of two-phase systems such as ammonia-water in multi-stage turbines. This invention differs from the a.m. disclosures in the sense that one-stage radial turbines are employed which pose very different challenges compared to axial turbines.
For the invention, it is relevant to appreciate that expansion machines can be selected on the basis of the Cordier/Balje diagram of dimensionless parameters including the rotation frequency, average volume flow and the isentropic heat drop. Comparing axial and radial turbines, the optimum performance range of axial turbines as function of the dimensionless specific speed is rather broad. By contrast, radial turbines have a rather narrow range where the turbine efficiency is above 80, or >85 or >88% of theoretical maximum. Provided the dimensionless specific speed is about 0.7 (range 0.5-0.9), a single stage radial turbine can be as efficient as a one- or two-stage axial turbine (see Balje).
Given that the C3 thermodynamic cycle as disclosed in SE 2012 050 319 and SE 2013/051 059 as well as SE 1300 576-4, SE 1400 027-7 and SE 1400 160-6, hereby incorporated by reference, can generate pressure ratios of far above 10, the natural choice of a suitable expansion machine is an axial multi-stage turbine. However, in the desired effect range of 100 kW electricity production, few products are available, and both the design and production of suitable axial turbines are very or even prohibitively expensive. Surprisingly, it was found by the inventors that the C3 process can be adjusted by proper choice of chemistry and working fluid composition (absorption enthalpy in the range of preferably 700-1400 kJ/kg CO2, and suitable evaporation enthalpies of co-solvents in the range of 200-1100, preferably 300-800 kJ/kg solvent,), heat exchangers etc., such that a significantly cheaper single stage radial turbine can be employed at the optimum point of performance, where axial and radial turbines perform equally well. It appears counter-intuitive to employ a turbine most suitable for a pressure of about 8 when the system would allow the use of multi-stage turbines and pressure ratios of >>10 on the basis of pressure generation capability at high temperature, and vacuum generation capability at low temperature. However, careful modelling of the single stage configuration and the associated flows (saturated amine, unsaturated amine, both volatile or non-volatile as defined by boiling points above or below 100° C. at atmospheric pressure, CO2 gas, solvents) reveals the unexpected benefits. As far as limitations of the configuration are concerned, systems with absorption enthalpies below 700, below 800, below 900, or 1000 or 1100 kJ/kg CO2 would be characterized by very large liquid flows unless the temperature on the hot side is raised to above 100° C. It should be clear that the optimum configuration from a cost point-of-view is found by modelling, and balancing costs of especially the turbine and the necessary heat exchangers.
This invention concerns in one aspect a method to generate electricity from low value heat streams such as industrial process heat, heat from engines or geothermal or solar heat at the lowest cost possible, i.e. with economic equipment resulting in low depreciation costs. Surprisingly, radial turbines offer not only reasonable costs, but they also offer certain technical advantages, such as: A radial turbine can be designed without bearings on the exit side. This offers the possibility of having a highly-effective diffuser for optimum turbine performance. The required bearings will be on the alternator side of the unit (commonly referred to as “overhang”. There will therefore be no need for bearing struts in the diffuser. The diffuser recovery will be improved if no struts are present in the flow path.
Further, no shaft seal is needed in the low pressure regime. By virtue of the “overhang design” of the bearings, the turbine has no shaft-seal on the low-pressure (or absorber) side. This means that the risk of air leaking into the cycle is effectively removed.
Also, the “swallowing capacity”/choking effect can be used advantageously, allowing to let the rotational frequency control upstream pressure. An un-choked radial turbine has a rather large speed influence on the turbine swallowing capacity (i.e. the flow-pressure-temperature-relation). This feature can be used to optimize the cycle pressure, hence chemistry, at various off-design conditions, by varying the turbine speed. The turbine speed is controlled by the power electronics.
Finally, the diffusor can be integrated into the absorption chamber 24 in various ways, at a 0-90 degree angle, generating swirl etc in order to ensure maximum interaction of gas and liquid absorbent. The diffusor may be placed vertically or horizontally or at any angle. The turbine diffuser and the absorber can be combined into a single part, where the absorption process starts already in the turbine diffuser, provided that nozzles can be placed without too severe aerodynamic blockage. Providing a liquid flow on the inner walls of the diffusor is an option to prevent build-up of residues such as ice or crystals in the diffuser.
Turbine design: as temperature is low, the aerodynamic profile can be optimized since no scalloping will be required. The C3 temperature level is lower than e.g. in automotive applications and there is no need for additional stress reduction such as removing the hub at the turbine inlet. The efficiency of the turbine can be increased by two to four points by avoiding the scalloping. This feature is unique for the C3-cycle with a radial turbine. No scalloping needed=supporting elements on the downstream side of the turbine wheel, to improve the mechanical stability in case of exposure to high temperature. No compromise is required.
The invention enables the use of cheaper materials for construction, including thermoplastics or glass/carbon fiber reinforced thermosets or thermoplastics, as a direct consequence of low maximum temperatures (60-120° C.) and low pressures (<10 bar) prevalent in the C3 process and its embodiments as described above. Also the preferred rotation speed of the turbine in the range of 18000 to 30000 revolutions per minute (rpm), preferably between 20000 and 25000 revolutions per minute, fits to cheap engineering materials.
In one embodiment, the turbine design is modified to enable the removal of a condensing liquid. Said liquid may e.g. be amine or water or any component which condenses first from a composition of at least two working fluids. Condensing liquids in general may cause erosion, corrosion, and a lowering of the obtainable efficiency, e.g. due to friction, changed inlet angle etc. In axial turbines, removal of condensing liquid is state-of-the-art, however, in radial turbines no designs have been published. For the application according to the invention, a preferred embodiment includes the positioning of slits or openings downstream of the inlet channels 18, but upstream of the rotating blades. At that position, a significant pressure is available for removing condensing liquid. Liquid may be transported away from the turbine towards the condenser using said pressure difference through pipes and optional valves. Said valves may be triggered by sensors which detect the presence of liquid, e.g. by measuring heat conductivity.
In one embodiment of the above solution to remove condensing liquid, it may be beneficial to also extract condensing liquid prior to working gas/fluid entering the stator or the inlet channels 18. Working gas enters the space upstream of the stator, and especially during start-up of the machine, some fluid/gas may condense.
From a process point-of-view, the disclosed combination of radial turbines and the C3 process fits to most of the systems and chemistries described in the a.m. disclosures.
In a specific embodiment, a working fluid composition of a) amines such as dibutylamine or diethylamine, 0-80% by weight, b) solvent selected from the group consisting of acetone (preferred due to its excellent expansion characteristics), isopropanol, methanol and ethanol, at least 20% by weight and c) CO2, not more than 0.5 mol per mol amine, and d) optionally water (0-100% by weight) is chosen. The working gas entering the turbine comprises a mixture of CO2, amine, solvent and optionally water at a ratio defined by the process parameters and the working fluid composition. The exact composition of the working gas is preferably chosen such that the working gas expands in a “dry” mode, i.e. avoiding condensation and drop formation on the turbine blades.
In one embodiment, water is part or constitutes 100% of the working fluid composition. Whilst water is affecting the partial pressures of all components, benefits relating to fire risks result. Further, the absorption enthalpies of the amine/CO2 reaction is reduced.
In one embodiment, volatile amines such as diethylamine (DEA) are employed. DEA has a boiling point of 54° C. and is therefore part of the working gas and is removed from the equilibrium of amine and CO2. This result in complete CO2 desorption from the carbamate based on CO2 and DEA. This mode of operation obviates the need for using a central heat exchanger, or allows to use a smaller heat exchanger.
In one embodiment, non-volatile amines such as dibutylamine (DBA) are employed.
In one embodiment relating to turbine technology and the risk of solvents dissolving lubricants in bearings, magnetic bearings are employed. Alternatively, the bearing space is continuously evacuated, or a small gas stream, e.g. CO2, is led into the bearing space at a slightly higher pressure than prevalent in the process, such that solvent condensation in the bearing space is avoided. Gas leaking from the bearing space into the process can be evacuated e.g. using techniques described in as yet unpublished patent applications.
In one embodiment, further relating to minimizing the risk that lubricant is removed or washed out from bearings, but also relating to the risk that bearings wear out prematurely due to non-ideal loads in axial or radial direction, the turbine is modified in a way which is further shown in
In one embodiment, the purpose of the turbine modification, namely the reduction of the gas pressure in the space where the bearing is placed, is achieved by fluidly connecting said space by a pipe or bypass leading towards the low pressure side, i.e. the absorber or condenser. Said pipe may comprise a valve which can be regulated. Another bypass from the high pressure gas side into the bearing space, with a regulating valve, may serve to adjust the pressure and the axial load onto the bearings. Various configurations are conceivable, e.g. a solution with two labyrinth seal sections with different diameters whereby the inner section between the smallest labyrinth seal and the axle is kept at minimum pressure in order to protect the bearing, and the section between the two labyrinth seals is kept at higher pressure to adjust the axial load on the bearing.
One special advantage of the solutions described here is that the electrical generator 14 which may be in fluid connection with the bearing space can be kept at low pressure. This prevents condensation of working medium also in the generator. The solution involves a small loss such as between 0.1 and 5% of high pressure gas which otherwise would be available for power generation, however, the benefits such as prevention of working liquid condensation in the generator or on the bearing and the reduction of undesirable forces onto the bearings, and therefore extended lifetime of the turbine, outweigh the loss.
In one embodiment, from known bearing solutions for turbines, such as roller bearings, magnetic bearings and the like, a hydrostatic bearing is chosen. In a preferred embodiment, the working gas or medium or fluid itself is carrying the load. This solution is especially preferred in case a solvent such as acetone, isopropanol or water is used as working fluid. The working fluid may be pumped into the space between the static parts and the rotating parts by means of a pump, e.g. an external separate pump or a process pump which is pumping working fluid within the system. The pressure may be in the interval 2-10 bar, preferably below 5 bar. The rotational speed is preferably in the range 20000-30000 rpm for power generation systems producing 50-200 kW but may be much higher (>100000) for small-scale systems, e.g. 10 kW systems. One particular advantage of hydrostatic bearings, apart from enabling high rotational speeds, is that lubricant or grease in conventional bearings is not needed in hydrostatic bearings. There would otherwise be a certain risk that lubricant or components in lubricant such as mineral oil would be extracted from the bearing area. This would deplete the bearing from necessary lubricant, and the extracted lubricant component would accumulate in the process.
It should be understood that the concepts in the different embodiments may be combined.
All embodiments are characterized by the fact that below atmospheric pressure prevails on the cold or absorption/condensation side of the process. Depending on temperature of the cooling stream, the pressure may be <0.8 bar, <0.7 bar, <0.6 bar or preferably <0.5 bar. This pressure can be maintained by providing cooling in the absorber, e.g. a heat exchanger, and/or by recirculating condensed working fluid and cooling said liquid inside or outside of the absorption/condensation chamber as described elsewhere.
In
The following clauses describe aspects of various examples of thermodynamic operating methods and systems.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1400027 | Jan 2014 | SE | national |
1400186 | Apr 2014 | SE | national |
1400384 | Aug 2014 | SE | national |
1400492 | Oct 2014 | SE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/SE2015/050046 | 1/20/2015 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2015/112075 | 7/30/2015 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2102637 | Ulrich | Dec 1937 | A |
4009575 | Hartman, Jr. et al. | Mar 1977 | A |
4031712 | Costello | Jun 1977 | A |
4066381 | Earnest | Jan 1978 | A |
4512394 | Kauffman | Apr 1985 | A |
4774858 | Ganoung | Oct 1988 | A |
5398497 | Suppes | Mar 1995 | A |
5408747 | Fredmonski et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5557936 | Drnevich | Sep 1996 | A |
6209307 | Hartman | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6269644 | Erickson et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6668554 | Brown | Dec 2003 | B1 |
7019412 | Ruggieri et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7685820 | Litwin et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
9429046 | Ostrom et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
20050111980 | Negulescu | May 2005 | A1 |
20050193758 | Wells | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20080047502 | Morse | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20090071153 | Boyapati et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090158739 | Messmer | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090287011 | Evans et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100077752 | Papile | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100154419 | Kontomaris | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100212318 | Schaal | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100236242 | Farsad et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100251711 | Howes et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110265501 | Nir | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110308252 | Kopecek et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20130038055 | Ostrom et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130105110 | Mills | May 2013 | A1 |
20130160450 | Cogswell | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130280036 | Jan et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20150112075 | Yang et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20160201521 | Karthauser | Jul 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101101158 | Jan 2008 | CN |
302037 | Sep 2010 | CZ |
102004006837 | Aug 2005 | DE |
1103699 | May 2001 | EP |
1925785 | May 2008 | EP |
2128386 | Dec 2009 | EP |
2669473 | Dec 2013 | EP |
S55149641 | Nov 1980 | JP |
9504683 | Jun 1997 | SE |
9627075 | Sep 1996 | WO |
0066887 | Nov 2000 | WO |
2004104399 | Dec 2004 | WO |
2006124776 | Nov 2006 | WO |
2008074637 | Jun 2008 | WO |
2011130981 | Oct 2011 | WO |
2012116174 | Aug 2012 | WO |
2012128715 | Sep 2012 | WO |
2014042580 | Mar 2014 | WO |
2015034418 | Mar 2015 | WO |
20160076779 | May 2016 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Sauret, et al., “Candidate radial-inflow turbines and high-density working fluids for geothermal power systems”, Energy 2011, vol. 36, Issue 7, pp. 4460-4467. |
Harinck et al., Computational Study of a high-expansion ratio radial organic rankine cycle turbine stator:, ASME, Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, vol. 132, Issue 5, May 2010. |
PCT/SE2015/050046—International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 30, 2015, 17 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/582,369—Office Action dated Sep. 2, 2014, 18 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/582,369—Response to Sep. 2 Office Action filed Oct. 17, 2014, 12 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/582,369—Office Action dated Nov. 7, 2014, 18 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/582,369—Response to Nov. 7 Office Action filed Dec. 23, 2014, 14 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/582,369—Office Action dated May 6, 2015, 19 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/582,369—Response to May 6 Office Action filed Jul. 28, 2015, 13 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/582,369—Office Action dated Sep. 11, 2015, 19 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/582,369—Response to Sep. 11 Office Action filed Dec. 7, 2015, 21 pages. |
Begamudre, Rakosh Das, “Energy Conversion Systems,” ISBN:81-224-1266-1, New Age International Limited, Publishers, Copyright 2000, p. 266. |
Robbins, T. and Garimella, S., “Low-Grade Waste Heat Recovery for Power Production using an Absoption-Rankine Cycle” (2010), International Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Conference. Paper 11547, Purdue University Jul. 12-15, 2010, 9 pages. |
Chen, H., et al., “A Review of Thermodynamic Cycles and Working Fluids for the Conversion of Low-grade Heat,” Clean Energy Research Center, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2010 Elsevier Ltd., 9 pages. |
PCT/SE2014/050991—International Search Report dated Dec. 19, 2014, 5 pages. |
PCT/SE2012/050319—International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jun. 7, 2012, 11 pages. |
PCT/SE2012/050319—European Search Report dated Oct. 13, 2015, 9 pages. |
EP 14842782—Extended European Search Report dated Jun. 6, 2017, 3 pages. |
PCT/SE2014/050991—International Written Opinion dated Dec. 19, 2014, 9 pages. |
PCT/SE2015/051181—International Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 19, 2016, 13 pages. |
PCT/SE2015/051181—International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated May 16, 2017, 9 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/582,369—Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 22, 2015, 12 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/582,369—Supplemental Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 13, 2016 Dec. 2015, 22 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/582,369—Response to Office Action dated Sep. 2, 2014, filed Oct. 17, 2014, 12 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/236,136—Office Action dated Oct. 6, 2017, 33 pages. |
SE 1400492-3—Office Action dated May 26, 2015, 8 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170037728 A1 | Feb 2017 | US |