This invention generally relates to thermoformed apparatuses and more particularly to a polymeric pallet or container having a communications device.
The 48 inch by 40 inch wood pallet is an integral part of North America's distribution system, and is involved in one way or another in the movement of a significant proportion of all goods bought and sold. According to Material Handling Engineering (October 1999), page 16, the U.S. Forest Service estimates there are 1.9 billion wooden pallets in America. Approximately 400 million new pallets are needed each year. 175 million of these are pallets repaired for reuse by industry. Therefore, roughly 225 million new wooden pallets enter the supply chain each year. The standard 48 inch by 40 inch wood pallet makes up a significant proportion of the total number of wood pallets within the over-all distribution system.
U.S. Forest researchers also found that 225 million wooden pallets are sent to landfills each year. According to CHEP Equipment Pooling Systems, the largest third party pallet leasing company with 94 million wooden pallets, the average 48 inch by 40 inch wooden pallet weighs between 28 pounds and 65 pounds at the time of manufacture (dry). These traditional wooden pallets range from 48 pounds to 110 pounds in weight (wet) at time of recycling or disposal. Using these figures, approximately 17.8 billion pounds of wood is deposited in landfills each year. APA, the Engineered Wood Association, estimates that a standard 48 inch by 40 inch style lumber stringer pallet has a three year life. The three year cost for this style of wooden pallet is estimated to be $11.74. A three year life is based on 15-24 trips per year. Conventional wooden pallets have limited residual value at the end of their useful life cycle.
According to the Grocery Manufacturers of America (hereinafter “GMA”), the largest end-user of traditional 48 inch by 40 inch wooden pallets within the North American distribution system, the current wooden pallet exchange system costs the industry nearly $2 billion to operate in 1991. For example, the trucking industry is unable to optimize semi trailer loading or per-unit transportation costs because GMA style pallets are not capable of true four-way entry. Drivers are required to exchange loaded pallets for empty pallets after delivery, and because of manual pallet handling injuries, workers compensation claims are significant. Grocery distributors are unable to use automated material handling equipment efficiently because unacceptable wooden pallets must be removed from the pallet supply chain. Grocery manufacturers and shippers experience product damage because of design flaws in traditional wooden pallets. Furthermore, unit loading is not evenly distributed with stringer pallet designs, which results in product and packaging damage in transport. Manufacturers must use stronger and costlier packaging because of wooden pallet problems. Wooden pallet sanitation and moisture absorption difficulties affect meat and other food processors. Moreover, general pallet deterioration, manifested by protruding nails and staples, splintered wood and missing stringers, results in significant inefficiencies within the over-all distribution system.
More and more companies are finding it preferable to employ third-party pallet management services to control the costs and logistics of using wooden pallets. For example, some fruit growers require pallets on a seasonal basis. Wooden pallets may therefore be rented for short or long terms from third parties. Third party service companies offer nationwide access to pools of wooden pallets, have responsibility for collecting and redeploying pallets where they are needed, and keep the pallet pool at a relatively high level of quality to move product through the distribution channel. The pallet tracking and retrieval systems deployed by the third party providers are more elaborate and efficient than other segments within the wooden pallet market. For example, bar code labels have been used to manage the efficiency of conventional pallet assets. A direct line of sight is, however, required by the scanner to read a bar card label. The performance of these systems has been generally unreliable and costly to implement within a wooden pallet environment.
Conventional Radio Frequency Identification (hereinafter “RFID”) systems have also been used but without success for a number of reasons. For instance, there are too many makes and models of 48 inch by 40 inch wooden pallets in the market. Also, a standard protocol has not been advanced. Furthermore, pallet handling procedures, material deterioration, product damage and repair practices require a more robust RFID tag technology than is currently available and wood is not a stable platform for the attachment of many types of RFID tags. Additionally, radio frequencies are absorbed by moisture in wood, which makes tag reads unreliable. Standard harsh operating conditions within the wooden pallet distribution system, thermal shock, sanitation, flexure, vibration, compressive forces and fork impacts, can cause traditional tag transponder coils to break and fail.
The velocity at which 48 inch by 40 inch wooden pallets travel through the distribution system is far less than optimum because a significant proportion of wooden pallets are not suitable for transporting goods, damage free. Although 175 million pallets are repaired each year, industry observers claim as many as 70% of all wooden pallets have deteriorated from their original specifications. Unacceptable wooden pallets have to be separated from acceptable wooden pallets, which is time consuming, injurious and wasteful. Accordingly, a far larger pool of wooden pallets is maintained in operation than would otherwise be required under optimum conditions. The traditional 48 inch by 40 inch wooden pallet is therefore tremendously inefficient, costing industry billions of dollars annually. Wooden pallets also have considerable negative societal and environmental impacts because the recourses used to purchase, repair and dispose wooden pallets could be more effectively deployed in other less costly product technology alternatives.
Accordingly, plastic pallets have been used to replace wood pallets with some degree of success over the past several years. Plastic pallets are known for their longevity and are generally more durable, lighter weight, compatible with automated material handling equipment, easily sanitized and 100 percent recyclable. Conventional plastic pallets, however, suffer from one significant disadvantage in that they cost considerably more than a comparable wooden pallet. Thermoplastic materials constitute a significant proportion of the total cost of a plastic pallet, and a given amount of relatively expensive polymeric material is required to produce a pallet with a measure of load-bearing strength that is comparable to wooden pallets.
As another example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,986,569 which issued to Mish et al. proposes applying a pressure sensitive tape to the backside of a tag carrier and affixing the carrier to an object. Generally speaking, however, exterior attachment methodologies are not sufficiently robust and durable. Tags affixed to the exterior of the pallet can be damaged through wear and tear, sanitation, fork lift impacts, and the like. Also, U.S. Pat. No. 5,936,527 which issued to Isaacman, et al., proposes a “cell” comprising a host transceiver and several local hard lined interrogators that detect local tags. In the Isaacman arrangement, several cells can be networked, which allows any tagged object to be identified from any PC within a multi-cell network.
It is significant that plastic pallet suppliers have been unable to physically identify, locate and track, in real time, comparatively expensive conventional plastic pallets within networks of distribution. It is one thing to lose a low cost wooden pallet, but it is another to lose an expensive asset. Different technologies have been proposed to attempt tracking of pallet assets within the distribution system, but these proposals have been incomplete with respect to system architectures, protocols and plastic pallet design intent. Bar codes have been used, but these again require a direct line of sight and have therefore been difficult to implement. RFID tags have been placed upon traditional molded pallets to locate and track their positions within the distribution system, but this type of pallet is so much more expensive than a comparable wooden pallet that the cost justification for implementation is not economical.
Moreover, it is known that conditions within the operating environment affect the performance of the RFID system. Several U.S. patents disclose protocols, circuitry architectures and other enabling methods for ensuring the interrogator properly communicates with one or more tags within an interrogation zone; these include: U.S. Pat. No. 5,229,648 which issued to Shindley et al.; U.S. Pat. No. 5,479,416 which issued to Snodgrass et al.; U.S. Pat. No. 5,539,775 which issued to Tuttle et al.; U.S. Pat. No. 5,583,819 which issued to Roesner et al.; U.S. Pat. No. 5,818,348 which issued to Walezak et al.; U.S. Pat. No. 5,822,714 which issued to Cato; U.S. Pat. No. 5,929,779 which issued to MacLellen et al.; U.S. Pat. No. 5,942,987 which issued to Heinrich et al.; U.S. Pat. No. 5,955,950 which issued to Gallagher et al.; U.S. Pat. No. 5,963,144 which issued to Kruest; and U.S. Pat. No. 5,986,570 which issued to Black et al. Still other proposals are offered to overcome the antenna-to-antenna communication difficulties conventionally experienced by tag carriers, such as pallets, as they travel through interrogation fields or portals. The rapidly changing angular geometry of a tag passing through a field or portal results in a diminishing duration and strength of signal transmission, which can produce unreliable tag reading results. The following U.S. patent Nos. propose solutions to this particular problem: U.S. Pat. No. 5,661,457 which issued to Ghaffari et al.; U.S. Pat. No. 5,708,423 which issued to Ghaffari et al.; U.S. Pat. No. 5,686,928 which issued to Pritchett et al.; U.S. Pat. No. 5,995,898 which issued to Tuttle; and U.S. Pat. No. 5,999,091 which issued to Wortham.
In accordance with the present invention, an apparatus has a communications device associated therewith. In another aspect of the present invention, a pallet is made from thermoformed polymeric sheets with an attached communications device. A further aspect of the present invention provides a radio frequency identification device attached to an apparatus. In still another aspect of the present invention, a communications device is incorporated into one or more sheets of a pallet or other container prior to forming. Methods of making and using a thermoformed pallet and container, having a communications device, are also provided.
The pallet of the present invention is advantageous over traditional constructions in that the present invention enhances protection of the communications device within the pallet in order to increase durability and reliability of the identification system. The locational placement of the communications device within the pallet allows for increased ability to track and identify polymeric pallets or other removable part transportation and storage containers, carriers, tanks or structures. Furthermore, the present invention is advantageous by incorporating the communications device into the pallet during the process of manufacturing the pallet. This advantageously allows for the information contained in the device to vary the pallet manufacturing machinery and the manufacturing process. Moreover, the present invention increases the economical feasibility for using traditionally more expensive polymeric pallets in the distribution chain through increased durability, tracking, recyclability and optimized manufacturing processes.
More specifically, the apparatus of the present invention advantageously employs a stronger plastic pallet that is lower cost, lighter weight, one hundred percent recyclable and wirelessly networked to a data center developed to efficiently manage the transportation of goods, damage free, throughout the distribution system. Furthermore, the present invention provides an economically viable plastic pallet replacement for traditional wooden pallets. The present invention also fulfills the need for a system that can be used to accelerate the velocity of pallet movement within the distribution system; hence, the present invention advantageously reduces the over-all number of plastic pallets within the distribution system. A suitable plastic pallet coupled to an RFID system and the methods of the present invention enable the pallets to be more effectively managed according to pre-selected system capabilities, objectives and cost constraints, while at the same time reducing the societal burden and environmental impact of conventional wooden pallets. Additional advantages and features of the present invention will become apparent from the following description and appended claims, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
Referring to
The RFID system is minimally composed of three components including an interrogator (reader or exciter), tag devices 16, and a host computer. The tag is alerted by a radio frequency wave transmitted by the interrogator to return a data message by arrangement. The information stored in memory is thus transmitted back to the interrogator. Information received by an interrogator is used by a host computer to provide a reliable and a secure architecture that meets predetermined performance requirements. In passive RFID systems, the RF field generates voltage that is rectified to power the tag. In active RFID systems, a battery is the source of a tag's power supply. Both passive and active RFID devices may be embedded within the structure of the preferred plastic pallet.
Radio frequency identification tags and interrogators can be made in accordance with the following U.S. Pat. No. 6,027,027 entitled “Luggage Tag Assembly” which issued to Smithgall on Feb. 22, 2000 and U.S. Pat. No. 6,013,949 entitled “Miniature Radio Frequency Transceiver” which issued to Tuttle on Jan. 11, 2000. Both of these patents are incorporated by reference herein.
RFID device 16 is encapsulated between the sheets forming pallet 4. In general, thermoplastic resins are extruded through a machine that produces a selective sheet or web of heat deformable plastic. As the preformed sheet or web travels through the extruder, one or more surfaces of the sheet receives one or more RFID tags. This may be done automatically or manually such that the tag is located on the plastic according to predetermined criteria corresponding to a select molding position upon the thermoforming tooling. The sheet thus tagged moves through a thermoforming machine that molds the sheet into a finished pallet. The tag or tags are sandwiched between the sheets of plastic forming the pallet at predetermined locations. In this manner, the tag is embedded, isolated, protected and contained in a fluid tight plastic barrier that is resilient, long lasting and not externally, physically visible. In order to ensure that the RFID device is not damaged in the thermoforming process of preference, a high temperature RFID device methodology, such as that described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,973,599 which issued to Nicholson et al., may be used; this patent is also incorporated by reference herein. The location of the device within the pallet is selected for system requirements. A plurality of locations can be used by cross-referencing machine and extrusion direction dimension references upon the plastic sheet with their counter part locations upon the properly thermoformed article. Thus, through such registration techniques, a consistent location for positioning the tag upon the sheet relative to its selected location in the finished part can be repeated with a high degree of certainty. In more detail, molded-in structures of the plastic pallet may be adapted to further protect the RFID device from flexural and compressive forces that may other wise damage the device.
RFID device 16 is part of a system in which data about pallet 4 is stored for retrieval according to system criteria. The advantage of encapsulating RFID device 16 within the structure pallet 4 is so that device 16 is protected from the harsh environment that pallet 4 must operate within.
There are a number of methods that can be used to insert RFID device 16 within thermoformed pallet 4. In one embodiment, RFID device 16 is a passive RFID tag 18. An example of such a passive tag 18 is shown in FIG. 4. Tag 18 includes an antenna coil 20, modulation circuitry 22 and a micro-memory chip or integrated circuit 24. Tag 18 is ultra thin, and in the order of 1 and ½ square inches. A plurality of tags 18 are normally placed upon a polymer tape substrate by the tag manufacturer and delivered on reels for integration into a manufacturing process.
A plastic sheet is heated to a deformable temperature before it is molded by differential vacuum pressure over a mold. Intervention is required to integrate tag 18 into the thermoforming process in order to minimize stretching and heat deformation of the PET substrate. As is shown in
This arrangement produces a tag construction that is resistant to deformation under the short-term and high heat environment of the thermoforming process. Substrate 32 of tag 18 will not significantly stretch as the attached sheet 62 is deformed over a three dimensional molding surface. Moments of shear at the location of tag 18 will also be deflected through movement of adhesive film 36a. Adhesive 30 will deflect compression upon the memory chip by providing a compression buffer (thickness) equal to the elevation of memory chip 24. In this manner, tag 18 is developed to sustain the rigors of thermoforming.
Another alternate variation of the communications device in the structure of the pallet provides a power supply, an antenna, a radio frequency transmitter, a radio frequency receiver, a digital signal processor, a pallet information memory chip set, a pallet identification reader card, and circuitry. The memory chip set controls the function of the communicator and the identification reader card identifies the communicator and pallet. The communications device will thereby remotely communicate with an external interrogator in a wireless manner, such as by cellular telephone types of transmissions. This is used to instruct the interrogator to then query tags on or in the pallet or container. The interrogator also includes a power supply, an antenna, a radio frequency transmitter, a radio frequency receiver, a data processing micro-controller and circuitry.
Referring to
Referring to
In the preferred order of arrangement shown in
One of the tags, in this example tag 18a, interfaces with a Manufacturing Management System (hereinafter “MMS”) deployed throughout the overall manufacturing infrastructure. Sheets 62, 68 and 70 (in the triple sheet method) are conveyed to a thermoforming machine RF interrogator field 72, where a RFID tag interrogator 74 identifies and reads data stored on tags 18a. Tags 18a send preprogrammed data packages back to interrogator 74a. Interrogator 74a interfaces with LAN PC 76 connected to thermoforming machine PLC 78 interfacing through LAN to MMS host computer 80. PLC 78 instructs machine and ancillary equipment how to process plastic sheets 62, 68 and/or 70. PLC 76 next instructs tooling 77 how to process plastic sheets 62, 68 and/or 70. If the MMS criteria are not met, the thermoforming process is disabled. If the MMS criteria are met, tag 18a traverses a interrogator field 82 and tag 18a writes and locks final data into non-volatile tag 18a memory before pallet 4 exits the field to enter the supply chain. Other tags 18b, 18c, 18d and 18e do not interface with interrogator fields 72 and 82.
Referring now to
In triple sheet constructions, other pallet strengthening techniques can be used to increase the survivability of devices 16 within chamber 88. Sheets 62, 68 and 70 are formed to substantially position chamber 88 between a top load-bearing surface 98 and a bottom tine contacting surface 100 of pallet 4 so that devices 16 are isolated from damaging events within the core of the pallet 4. This arrangement is illustrated in FIG. 12.
As understood in reference to
System interference may also occur if nearby devices 16 travels outside interrogation zone 102 but through the interrogator's signal pattern 112. Similarly, as pallet 4 is traveling through the WMS, device 16 may excite other interrogators coming within reader range. These occurrences may lead to unreliable data. In order to minimize these and other potential problems, it is preferred to encapsulate devices 16 along a center axis 114 of pallet 4. This is shown in FIG. 14. Axis 114 may progress from either the long or short side of the 48 inch by 40 inch pallet 4. Devices 16 are positioned along axis 114 which resides in a zone 115 contiguous to a center leg 116 of pallet 4. In this manner, tag 18 can be interrogated from either the right or left hand side of pallet 4.
Referring to
It may also be understood in connection with
In the present invention, a pallet and corresponding load of tagged objects, or stack of pallets, are positioned within the interrogation zone by a manually operated motorized pallet transporting vehicle. The interrogation field detects the vehicle within the zone by a triggering device. The interrogator communicates with the tags in the zone, and upon completion of this task, communicates with a visual message delivery device that is operative to instruct the driver to exit the interrogation field or pass through the portal. An LED light or the equivalent can be positioned on the drive console of the vehicle to inform the driver to stop and proceed. A stop and go light arrangement can also be positioned within the field of view of the driver to achieve the desired communication. Alternately, the host computer receiving pallet information can interface with pallet transporting vehicle by displaying on a console where the pallet is to be stored within the warehouse.
Reference should now be made to FIG. 16. Another feature of the present invention employs encapsulating an interrogator communications device 130 between the sheets forming pallet 4. Interrogator 130 could be adapted through system architecture to take an inventory of the tags 18 or sub-set of tags 18 residing upon pallet 4. It should be appreciated that interrogator 130 is a substantially larger device 16 than tag 18. It may therefore be impractical to encapsulate interrogator 130 within pallet 4 in the process manner outlined above. In order to insert interrogator 130 within pallet 4, the following methodologies would be preferred. In a twin sheet pallet construction, interrogator 130 is delivered to a selected location by means of a shuttle type delivery system that is adapted to move from a position outside the form station where apparatus loads an interrogator from a supply, to a position inside the form station, where the apparatus unloads the interrogator; it then shuttles back to load another interrogator, in between the time first sheet 10 is thermoformed and when it is sequentially fused to thermoformed second sheet 12. The shuttle type delivery system could also be adapted to located a plurality of devices 16, also including tags 18, between the time first sheet 10 is molded and second sheet 12 is fused to first sheet 10 in a twin sheet construction. A shuttle system of the type may alternately be substituted with a robotic arm.
It will also be appreciated that interrogator 130 will draw a considerable amount of power for operation. Interrogator 130 is therefore active, with power supplied from a battery 132. From time to time, interrogator battery 132 may be replaced according to a maintenance schedule contained in a data array of one of tags 18, preferably tag 18a. As was also the case with tags 18, interrogator 130 will fail if delicate instruments 133, memory and integrated circuit chips 133a, or circuitry 135 printed on a circuit board 137 are damaged during the high temperature and compression events of the thermoforming process. Intervention is thus required to insert battery-powered devices 16 between sheets of plastic.
Interrogator 130 is enclosed in a heat and compression resistant thermoplastic housing 134. A housing base 134b has a flange and threaded section 135. Threaded section 135 accepts a thermoplastic seal and threaded plate 136. Plate 136 is removable to replace or recharge battery 132. Tags 18 may also be embedded in pallet 4 inside housing 134. Alternately, tags 18 are manufactured or deposited upon circuit board 137 of interrogator 130. As shown, battery 132 may be mounted to plate 136 adapted to reconnect the battery as the plate is threaded to a closed position. Spring terminals 138, concentrically arranged about an axis corresponding to the rotational path of the terminals 139 on the affixed battery 132, are developed to ensure robust connection and enduring power supply. An EMI shield 141 is provided to prevent tag reading interference; otherwise multiple pallets with goods on each pallet stored on warehouse racking may demand the use of a directional antenna 142. Housing flange 135 is larger in diameter than a circuit board assembly. The circuit board assembly can be removed for maintenance, upgrading and recycling of pallet 4. It is preferred that housing 134 is recyclable with the pallet when emptied. Other arrangements enclosing the devices in protective housings to withstand the rigors of thermoforming are also practical.
In order for pallet interrogator 130 to communicate with a LAN PC, a Wireless Wide Area Communication System 140 is added. System 140 can be a cellular communicator inter-operating in an open standard environment. In the event FCC's E-911 mandate precludes utilizing cellular communications in this application (i.e. GPS), an alternative technology that can be used is wireless PC communications. The circuitry of a RF based interface PC card for a mobile PC device could be deposited upon circuit board 137. A local area Ethernet communicator interfaces the PC card circuitry with a LAN PC, and through the LAN PC by the Internet to host computer(s) 80. One or more circuit board antennas 142 may be slaves to several communications devices, as is battery 132.
In the triple sheet configuration of
The wireless interrogator is instructed to identify a plurality or sub-set of the RFID tags associated with articles supported upon the pallet. Thus, a pallet would be able to perform, for example, its own inventory check by arrangement.
The present invention is further advantageous over conventional systems, such as that disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,936,527, since inserting a wireless active interrogator in a plastic pallet of the present invention allows transportability and can be instructed to perform an operation anywhere or at any selected time within the wireless network. Examples of such a wireless network includes digital telephony, satellite communications, wireless Internet, microwave, cellular transmissions, and the like. Among other alternate embodiments of this aspect, is an optional renewable power supply device 351 (see
Moreover, the wireless active interrogators could also be positioned within a molded structure forming part of the plastic pallet. A battery supply information field could be part of the manufacturing memory tag or third party pallet management memory array as preventative maintenance schedule field.
Yet another advantage of the aspect of encapsulating a plurality of RFID devices within the structure of a thermoformed pallet is that the same pallet can be tracked through different networks that interface according to differing substantially proprietary protocols. There are several popular data encoding methods, at least three data modulation standards and a handful of proprietary anticollision backscatter formats. It is unlikely that in the future, one device will be able to interface will all deployed systems because an open standard for interoperability has not overcome issues with respect to proprietary technologies. There is also a range of operating environments and computer operating system platforms to interface with. A combination of devices within one product that enables functionality at many locations with pre-existing system infrastructures will help propel the plastic pallet through the distribution system. Notwithstanding, one tag device with several proprietary circuits could be coupled with one or more memory chips, and one antenna coil.
According to yet another aspect of the invention, one or a plurality of RFID devices are provided within a single plastic pallet. For example, one such tag may be dedicated to manufacturing, material and recycle information storage. One tag may be specifically adapted for pallet tracking within the distribution system. The pallet may also host a third RFID device specified by third parties for specialized inventory tracking activities within closed-loop or associated distribution networks. A fourth tag may be developed to consolidate the data arrays of several tags transported upon the pallet for more efficient data compression and transfer. A fifth tag may be adapted for interfacing with the RFID systems deployed by the trucking industry. Accordingly, one or more RFID devices may be embedded within one pallet to facilitate one or more operations according to different implementation objectives that ultimately increase the efficiency of plastic pallets.
According to this additional preferred aspect of the present invention, one RFID device is used during the pallet manufacturing process. A relatively simple, programmable passive RFID device that provides a bi-directional interface for one-time programming and multiple readings of the memory is used. The tag on the plastic sheet is interrogated to instruct the PLC of the thermoforming machine how the sheet is to be processed. In one such example, even though the standard 48 inch by 40 inch wooden pallet is designed to carry 2,800 pounds, the GMA claims approximately 30% of the unit loads weigh less than 1,000 pounds, and 66% of unit loads weight under 2,000 pounds. Accordingly, the preferred thermoforming method may be used to produce a select range of standard plastic pallets, that are produced using different plastic formulations and processing guidelines, to meet different distribution system needs. The machine PLC may then be instructed to communicate to the tooling to instruct the tooling how to process the successive sheets. The thermoforming machine, production tooling and sheet materials thus interface with each other to recognize, synchronize, authenticate, implement and record manufacturing results to a manufacturing biased host computer. The memory array of the proposed device is limited to read-only data transmission and is disabled from accepting further programming or erasing instructions once the pallet is made but before the tagged pallet enters the pallet supply stream. The memory array of the manufacturing related RFID device will contain information pertaining to manufacture date, serial number, load bearing capabilities, operating temperatures, material composition, repair instructions, expiration date, recycling requirements, ownership, ISO certificates and the like. The data contained in the array could be tailored toward the needs of a third party pallet rental/leasing company, which can schedule and perform RFID and pallet maintenance.
This embodiment is explained in more detail as follows, with reference to FIG. 18. An end use customer requests a custom made final product by communicating his specifications manually to a sales office or through a remote electrical communications interface, such as the internet. The control system computer will use predetermined algorithms and look up tables to automatically determine the optimum manufacturing criteria for these customer specifications. The determined manufacturing criteria is subsequently communicated to the tag manufacturing plant's local host computer.
The tags are sequentially deposited upon a roll at which point the tags receive selective data information which is pre-programmed or stored in the memory of each tag. The pre-formed sheets, containing the RFID tag, are subsequently conveyed to the thermoforming plant or machinery for processing into end products, shown in the figure as product A and product B.
The RFID tag on the sheet traverse and travel through the interrogation field prior to entry of the sheet into the thermoforming machine. Data previously stored and programmed into the RFID tag memory is thereby communicated to the thermoforming machine PLC attached to the interrogator. The PLC thereby analyzes the received data and adjusts the manufacturing operation and machinery as predetermined for the specific data criteria analyzed.
For example, fire retardant fillers in the plastic sheet require a longer period of time for heating in the ovens. Thus, data regarding the presence of fire retardant materials, which has been previously programmed or stored in the RFID tag memory, instructs the PLC of its presence and the PLC then controls the machinery to provide increased heat in the ovens for the specific sheet about to enter the ovens. The next sheet to be processed may not have a fire retardant filler and thus the PLC will accordingly vary the machinery and processing operation to reduce the oven heat applied to that subsequent sheet to be processed. In another example, an end product may be desired to have a metal inserted frame for increased load bearing strength. When the interrogator receives this information from the RFID tag attached to a sheet to be processed, the PLC operating the processing machinery will then instruct an auxiliary input A machine to insert a metal frame between a pair of the sheets being processed. This can be done by a robotic arm or through other automation. The process is completed according to the preprogrammed manufacturing instructions in the machinery PLC, as altered or varied by data stored in the RFID tag for each sheet being processed. After completion, the PLC communicates the record of completion to a network computer for billing purposes and other statistical process control information.
Still according to another aspect of the present invention, one or more RFID devices are used to identify, locate and track a pallet within the distribution network throughout the pallet's life cycle. In the manner, computer based tools can be utilized to increase the velocity of the pallet through the system. In other words, the pallets are managed as an asset rather than an expense. The pallet is tracked using a more complex programmable RFID device that provides a variety of operating modes (single tag/multiple tag environments), including multiple write and read (EEPROM) capabilities. Tagged pallets traverse interrogation fields distributed throughout the distribution network to record the pallet's progress through the distribution system. The RFID devices include anticollision modulation options to resolve backscatter when multiple tags are in the same interrogation fields. Automatic pallet material handling equipment is upgraded to accommodate readers and communicators. Supply chain management and control of the movement of pallets through the distribution system are facilitated with real-time data input from the integrated RFID system. Host, interrogator and tag interface according to various implementation criteria, such as last scan time & date, movement order number field, “from” field, “to” field, shipper field, pallet rental release field, and pallet return instructions. RFID technology provides a two-way flow of information between the pallet and the system server to help propel the pallet through the distribution system. The RFID devise may also carry its own electronic manifest. A more efficient use of plastic pallets will reduce the total number of pallets required by the over all distribution system.
According to a further feature of the present invention, each RFID device that is contained in the pallet may be developed to operate on different radio frequencies (13.56 megahertz to 2.45 gigahertz) in order to optimize system performance and minimize the cost of interrogators and tags. Each device may use a different coding waveform algorithm to reduce data recovery errors, bandwidth problems, synchronization limitations and other system design and cost considerations. For example, the pallet manufacturer does not need interrogation systems interfacing with the tracking systems, and vice versa. Thus, a less elaborate and costly RFID system is needed by the thermoforming manufacturer to deploy RFID systems. Similar tag device transmissions may be echeloned according to prescribed system criteria or other pallet management tools or model algorithms.
As Faraday's law and Lenz's law are well known, it is also understood that the parallel orientation, and the distance between the reader and tag antenna coils in respect of each other are important for the successful operation of passive RFID devices in particular. Read range is lower in higher frequency passive RFID devices. Furthermore, it is understood that induction is maximized when the antenna coils are perpendicular to the direction of the radio frequency signal. Therefore, another feature of the present invention provides for encapsulation of RFID devices within the structure of the plastic pallet. In one embodiment, an interrogator is contained in a vertical freestanding structure off to the side of the path traveled by the RFID device. Accordingly, the antenna coils located in the interrogator and pallet are vertically oriented in approximate parallel condition to facilitate a proper signal transmission. In another embodiment, an interrogator is placed upon or under ground along the path traveled by the pallet, or alternatively suspended from above. In such an arrangement, it is advantageous to orient the respective antenna coils substantially horizontal in an approximate parallel condition to facilitate induction. These later arrangements would be difficult to duplicate and implement with wooden pallets because water absorbed by the wood would impede or reflect the RF signal away from the tag antenna.
A further preferred method of attaching RFID tags to polymeric sheets is as follows, with reference to
It is alternately envisioned that the film is colored so that it can be used to indicate tag location inside of a pallet for correct orientation to provide accurate readings as previously disclosed. For example, a plurality of colored films may be applied to denote RFID tag implementation criteria. For example,
Another preferred embodiment application of the thermoforming and communications device technology is shown in FIG. 22. In this embodiment, a gasoline fuel tank 601, such as those used with an automotive, motorcycle, all-terrain vehicle, airplane, boat or other motorized vehicle, is made using twin or triple sheet thermoforming. Tank 601 is made of three, three-dimensionally formed sheets of plastic, 603, 605 and 607, respectively, which are all joined together during processing. A bottom hollow section 609 operably contains a liquid, such as gasoline fuel. A top hollow section 611 contains a fuel filler, filter, and other standard devices 613 necessary for the operation of tank 601.
A communications device 621 is attached to an inside surface of sheet 607 within top hollow section 611 prior to thermoforming, as was previously disclosed herein with the pallet manufacturing. As the fuel is removed for engine combustion, environmentally hazardous gases are left to fill the space unoccupied by the fuel. Top hollow section 611 acts as a reservoir that contains the harmful gases that would otherwise escape through the devices 613 into the environment. The devices 613 can also recirculate the gas back into lower hollow sections 609, in a conventional manner. An instrument section of communications device 621 is operable to inspect and monitor the barrier performance of top hollow section 611 to ensure compliance with governmental regulations. When the vehicle is inspected, the data generated and stored by the instrument of device 621 is then conveyed through radio frequency communications to an external monitoring device operated by the governmental regulating authority for inspection purposes. The instrument section of device 621 can be battery activated in an active manner to provide regular intervals of inspection, can be passive to receive power when externally interrogated, or can be triggered one time when a predetermined threshold is met.
A further preferred application of the present invention is shown in
While the preferred embodiment of a thermoformed pallet having a radio frequency device has been disclosed, it should be appreciated that other variations may be employed. For example, with a shuttle type delivery system and methodology, the gantry and laminator apparatus are not required. There are several other methodologies that may be used to practice the useful purposes of embedding sophisticated communications and other technological devices within the structure of plastic pallet 2. Furthermore, analog or solid state circuitry can be employed instead of the microprocessors, integrated circuits and computers disclosed. There are a number of different reinforcing structures that can be molded into two or more sheets of plastic to reinforce the area around devices 16. It is not necessary to form a complete chamber in plastic, so long as device 16 remains in the areas developed to protect the device from thermoforming shock, and operating wear and tear. It is also understood that access to the devices may be from the top or bottom in the wide variety of pallets contemplated in the present methodology. Furthermore, the RFID tags can also be attached to other heat and pressure formable sheets, such as cardboard, fiberglass, or the like, prior to three dimensional forming of the sheets. Additionally, the RFID tags and other electrical communications devices can be employed to monitor food conditions within a food container. While various materials have been disclosed, it should be appreciated that other materials can be employed. It is intended by the following claims to cover these and any other departures from the disclosed embodiments which fall within the true spirit of this invention.
This application claims the benefit of provisional application No. 60/177,383, filed Jan. 24, 2000.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3398434 | Alesi, Jr. et al. | Aug 1968 | A |
3583036 | Brown | Jun 1971 | A |
3597799 | Earle | Aug 1971 | A |
3695188 | Granastein | Oct 1972 | A |
3702100 | Wharton | Nov 1972 | A |
3779687 | Alesi | Dec 1973 | A |
3783078 | Brodhead | Jan 1974 | A |
3787158 | Brown et al. | Jan 1974 | A |
3867088 | Brown et al. | Feb 1975 | A |
3868209 | Howell | Feb 1975 | A |
3919382 | Smarook | Nov 1975 | A |
3919445 | Smarook | Nov 1975 | A |
3919446 | Smarook | Nov 1975 | A |
3964400 | Brand | Jun 1976 | A |
4013021 | Steinlein et al. | Mar 1977 | A |
4070839 | Clem | Jan 1978 | A |
4079232 | Brokoff et al. | Mar 1978 | A |
4101252 | Brown | Jul 1978 | A |
4113909 | Beasley | Sep 1978 | A |
4133270 | Ravera | Jan 1979 | A |
4158539 | Arends et al. | Jun 1979 | A |
4164387 | Schermutzki et al. | Aug 1979 | A |
4164389 | Beasley | Aug 1979 | A |
4194663 | West et al. | Mar 1980 | A |
4244915 | Boardman | Jan 1981 | A |
4255382 | Arends et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
4287836 | Aoki | Sep 1981 | A |
4348442 | Figge | Sep 1982 | A |
4377377 | Arends et al. | Mar 1983 | A |
4428306 | Dresen et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
4464329 | Whiteside et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
4488496 | Polacco | Dec 1984 | A |
4500213 | Grimm | Feb 1985 | A |
4507348 | Nagata et al. | Mar 1985 | A |
4509432 | Win | Apr 1985 | A |
4509909 | Arends | Apr 1985 | A |
4513048 | Kaube et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4531901 | Andersen | Jul 1985 | A |
4555381 | Chazal et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
4600376 | Gillman et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4606278 | Shuert | Aug 1986 | A |
4608009 | Whiteside et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4636348 | Whiteside | Jan 1987 | A |
4649007 | Bonis et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4666544 | Whiteside et al. | May 1987 | A |
4742781 | Shuert | May 1988 | A |
4801347 | Garwood | Jan 1989 | A |
4846077 | Win | Jul 1989 | A |
4907515 | Win | Mar 1990 | A |
4969812 | Brown | Nov 1990 | A |
5007225 | Teasdale | Apr 1991 | A |
5030501 | Colvin et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5042396 | Shuert | Aug 1991 | A |
5046434 | Breezer et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5071603 | Kurumaji et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5088418 | Reckermann et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5108529 | Shuert | Apr 1992 | A |
5117762 | Shuert | Jun 1992 | A |
5123359 | DelBalso | Jun 1992 | A |
5123541 | Giannini et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5143778 | Shuert | Sep 1992 | A |
5156782 | Ballantyne | Oct 1992 | A |
5164211 | Comer | Nov 1992 | A |
5167969 | DeMaio, Jr. et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5168817 | Nulle et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5197395 | Pigott et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5197396 | Breezer et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5225213 | Brown et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5226373 | Esch | Jul 1993 | A |
5229648 | Sues et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5255613 | Shuert | Oct 1993 | A |
5283028 | Breezer et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5283029 | Ellemor | Feb 1994 | A |
5329861 | McCarthy | Jul 1994 | A |
5329862 | Breezer et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5337681 | Schrage | Aug 1994 | A |
5351627 | Junaedi | Oct 1994 | A |
5351628 | Breezer et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5351629 | Breezer et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5367960 | Schleicher | Nov 1994 | A |
5367961 | Arai et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5390467 | Shuert | Feb 1995 | A |
5391251 | Shuert | Feb 1995 | A |
5401347 | Shuert | Mar 1995 | A |
5402735 | DeJean | Apr 1995 | A |
5404829 | Shuert | Apr 1995 | A |
5407632 | Constantino et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5408937 | Knight, IV et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5413052 | Breezer et al. | May 1995 | A |
5427732 | Shuert | Jun 1995 | A |
5448110 | Tuttle et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5470641 | Shuert | Nov 1995 | A |
5479416 | Snodgrass et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5492069 | Alexander et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5505141 | Barber | Apr 1996 | A |
5517188 | Carroll et al. | May 1996 | A |
5527585 | Needham et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5531585 | Lupke | Jul 1996 | A |
5535668 | Besaw et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5539775 | Tuttle et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5555820 | Shuert | Sep 1996 | A |
5583819 | Roesner et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5596933 | Knight et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5606921 | Elder et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5620715 | Hart et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5624622 | Boyce et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5624630 | Breezer et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5635129 | Breezer et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5635306 | Minamida et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5638760 | Jordan et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5649295 | Shober et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5657007 | Anderson et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5661457 | Ghaffari et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5664322 | Best | Sep 1997 | A |
5676064 | Shuert | Oct 1997 | A |
5686928 | Pritchett et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5687652 | Ruma | Nov 1997 | A |
5708423 | Ghaffari et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5716581 | Tirrell et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5755162 | Knight et al. | May 1998 | A |
5769003 | Rose et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5774876 | Woolley et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5778801 | Delacour | Jul 1998 | A |
5782129 | Vanderzee et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5791262 | Knight et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5794542 | Besaw | Aug 1998 | A |
5794544 | Shuert | Aug 1998 | A |
5800846 | Hart | Sep 1998 | A |
5813355 | Brown et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5814185 | Chun et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5818348 | Walczak et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5822683 | Pashen | Oct 1998 | A |
5822714 | Cato | Oct 1998 | A |
5830299 | Teixidor Casanovas et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5836255 | Uitz | Nov 1998 | A |
5843366 | Shuert | Dec 1998 | A |
5845588 | Gronnevik | Dec 1998 | A |
5860369 | John et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5862760 | Kohlhaas | Jan 1999 | A |
5868080 | Wyler et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5879495 | Evans | Mar 1999 | A |
5885691 | Breezer et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5894803 | Kuga | Apr 1999 | A |
5900203 | Needham et al. | May 1999 | A |
5908135 | Bradford et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5921189 | Estepp | Jul 1999 | A |
5929779 | MacLellan et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5933354 | Shimada et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5936527 | Isaacman et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5942987 | Heinrich et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5950545 | Shuert | Sep 1999 | A |
5950546 | Brown et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5955950 | Gallagher, III et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5963144 | Kruest | Oct 1999 | A |
5967057 | Nakayama et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5971592 | Kralj et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5973599 | Nicholson et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5975879 | Dresen et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5980231 | Arends et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5986569 | Mish et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5986570 | Black et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5993724 | Shuert | Nov 1999 | A |
5999091 | Wortham | Dec 1999 | A |
6006677 | Apps et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6013949 | Tuttle | Jan 2000 | A |
6018641 | Tsubouchi et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6018927 | Major | Feb 2000 | A |
6021721 | Rushton | Feb 2000 | A |
6025780 | Bowers et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6027027 | Smithgall | Feb 2000 | A |
6029583 | LeTrudet | Feb 2000 | A |
6199488 | Favaron et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6483434 | UmiKer | Nov 2002 | B1 |
20020017745 | Vorenkamp et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020020487 | Vorenkamp et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020020705 | Vorenkamp et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 249 203 | Sep 1990 | EP |
9-41756 | Feb 1997 | JP |
10-32851 | Feb 1998 | JP |
WO 9821691 | May 1998 | WO |
WO 9964221 | Dec 1999 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20020030597 A1 | Mar 2002 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60177383 | Jan 2000 | US |