The present application is a 35 U.S.C. §§ 371 national phase conversion of PCT/JP2014/065040, filed Jun. 6, 2014, which claims priority to Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-172318, filed Aug. 22, 2013, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference. The PCT International Application was published in the Japanese language.
The present invention relates to methods and apparatuses for measuring thermophysical property values such as thermoelectric power and thermal conductivity of solids.
The absolute value of thermoelectric power of a metal material such as lead, platinum, etc., is a physical property value which is indispensable for a relative measurement method of thermoelectric power that is widely used in the field of physical property measurement. Absolute thermoelectric power is derived by comparative measurement with a superconductor as a reference material, using the fact that the Seebeck coefficient is zero in the superconducting state. This method causes a measurable temperature region to be restricted to a temperature which is lower than the superconducting transition temperature, so that it is necessary to derive the absolute thermoelectric power using the Kelvin relation from the measurable Thomson coefficient to expand the temperature measurement region.
Here, thermoelectric power S is generally defined as S=ΔV/ΔT using a voltage ΔV which is produced when a temperature difference ΔT is imparted to a metal or a semiconductor. A measurement value of the thermoelectric power based on this definition more accurately applies to a relative value, or, in other words, a difference in the thermoelectric power of a metal to be measured and a wiring material (metal), so that a correction which takes into account the thermoelectric power of the wiring material is needed to determine the absolute thermoelectric power of the metal to be measured. More specifically, when the thermoelectric power of the metal to be measured is around several tens of μ V/K, an effect of such a correction cannot be neglected.
Now, while a number of devices for measuring the thermoelectric power have already been commercially available, a simple and convenient relative measurement method is adopted as the measurement principle in any one of the devices. Here, while, with the relative measurement method, it is necessary to correct a value of the thermoelectric power of the metal to be measured by measuring the absolute thermoelectric power of the wiring material included in the device, there are currently no facilities for actually measuring the absolute thermoelectric power, so that, as shown in NON-PATENT DOCUMENTS 2-4, in reality, each manufacturer depends on data on measurements of the absolute thermoelectric power that were carried out between the 1970's and the 1980's.
More specifically, ever since Nettleton proposed, in 1916, a method of calculating the Thomson coefficient when a polarity-inverted DC voltage is applied to a thin metal wire (below called “a DC inversion method”) (see NON-PATENT DOCUMENT 1), the absolute thermoelectric power has been measured on lead, copper, platinum, etc., and determined for 0 to 1600 Kelvin (K) by Robert et al., (see NON-PATENT DOCUMENTS 2-4). Then, these measurement results have been widely adopted as reference values up to the present.
Here, the above-described Thomson coefficient μ is shown with the following Equation (1):
In the above Equation, T1 and T2 are temperatures in units of K at both ends of the metal to be measured when a voltage is applied to the both ends; I is a current in units of A, flowing through the metal; L is a length in m from an end to a midpoint of the metal; κ is a thermal conductivity in units of W/mK of the metal; a is a cross-sectional area in units of m2 of the metal; and δT represents a half of a temperature change in units of K at the center (the midpoint) of the metal when a polarity-inverted DC current is passed through the metal to be measured.
Then, the absolute thermoelectric power S is calculated with the Kelvin equation, or Equation (2) below:
In the above Equation, T0 means 92K, which is the superconducting transition temperature.
Moreover, from Equation (2), it is seen that the Thomson coefficient μ needs to be correctly determined to accurately determine the absolute thermoelectric power S.
Here, while a related-art absolute thermoelectric power measurement method determines the Thomson coefficient by measuring a temperature change caused by applying a DC voltage to a metal to be measured to which a temperature gradient is provided, a heat generation amount caused by the Thomson effect has a small value of less than or equal to approximately 1/100 of the Joule heat, which is generated at the same time.
Now, to perform accurate measurement of the heat amount, the above-described DC inversion method is being adopted in which the polarity-inverted DC current is passed through a subject to cancel out an effect of the Joule heat, which is generated by the current.
Now, the below-mentioned PATENT DOCUMENT 1 discloses a thermoelectric material evaluation device and a thermoelectric property evaluation method that calculate a thermoelectric power based on the above definition (ΔV/ΔT) of the absolute thermoelectric power S.
Moreover, the Thomson coefficient derivation equation (Nettleton's equation) is derived by the DC method based on the heat conduction equations in the below-mentioned NON-PATENT DOCUMENT 1, while the Nettleton's equation is used to actually measure, for the first time, the Seebeck coefficient from the Thomson coefficient for lead metal in NON-PATENT DOCUMENT 2.
Furthermore, the Seebeck coefficient is actually measured, for the first time, from the Thomson coefficient for copper metal by the current injection method in Non-patent document 3, while the Seebeck coefficient is actually measured, for the first time, in the range of 900K to 1600K from the Thomson coefficient for platinum metal by the current injection method in Non-patent document 4.
Moreover, non-patent documents 5 and 6 disclose a thermoelectric power measurement apparatus in which an AC method is adopted. Both relate to a method of measuring the thermoelectric power in a relative manner.
While any one of the physical quantities that make up Equation (1) can be measured, there is a problem that accurate measurements are difficult for the thermal conductivity κ or the length L of the metal to be measured. Moreover, while the current injection method has been devised in which the magnitude of current which is caused to flow such that the temperature of a predetermined portion of the metal to be measured is held constant is controlled, there is a problem that a complicated balancing operation is required since it is a type of non-balanced method, causing high skills to be needed.
Thus, most studies target relative thermoelectric power and no sufficient validations have been conducted for absolute thermoelectric power. Then, in actuality, a discrepancy between previous data obtained prior to 1970 and data measured again is also reported by the authors of NON-PATENT DOCUMENT 2 and there is a problem that a method of evaluating the absolute thermoelectric power has not yet been adequately established.
To solve the above-described problems, an object of the present invention is to provide a thermophysical property measurement method and a thermophysical property measurement apparatus that make it possible to simply and conveniently obtain accurate absolute thermoelectric power and thermal conductivity.
To solve the above-described problems, a scheme is provided of applying an AC voltage or an AC current to a conductor or a semiconductor to which a temperature gradient is provided to measure a first temperature change of the conductor or the semiconductor; applying DC voltages or DC currents of different polarities to the conductor or the semiconductor to measure a second temperature change of the conductor or the semiconductor; and calculating at least one of an absolute thermoelectric power and a thermal conductivity of the conductor or the semiconductor using the measured first and second temperature changes.
The present invention makes it possible to simply and conveniently obtain accurate absolute thermoelectric power and thermal conductivity.
First, the Thomson coefficient used in carrying out a thermophysical measurement method according to an embodiment of the present invention is described.
The present Thomson coefficient may be derived as follows, assuming that the alternating current-direct current (AC-DC) method, in which application of an alternating current voltage is combined with the direct-current (DC) inversion method, is used.
When an AC voltage VAC is applied to a metal to be measured (a thin metal wire) which meets thermal boundary conditions in the same manner as a case of applying a DC voltage to cause an AC current I(ω) to flow through the thin metal wire, the temperature distribution T in the steady state of the thin metal wire is shown with the heat conduction equation of Equation (3):
In the above Equation, x is a one-dimensional coordinate in units of length m, having one end of the thin metal wire as the origin; μ is the Thomson coefficient in units of μV/K; I(ω) is the current which flows through the thin metal wire in units of A; ρ is the electrical resistivity of the thin metal wire in units of Ω/m; s is the heat capacity of the thin metal wire in units of J/gK; d is the mass density of the thin metal wire in units of kg/m3; and t is time in units of seconds.
Here, as a time-varying sinusoidal AC voltage VAC is applied unlike for the direct current, the temperature is a function of time and location, so that partial differential equations need to be solved. While it is generally not simple to solve these heat conduction equations since they include variables in coefficients, it is relatively simple to determine an exact solution when the frequency is sufficiently high.
In other words, effects of heat absorption and heat generation that are caused by the Thomson effect are proportional to the sinusoidal current, so that, with the condition in which the frequency is sufficiently high (ω>>κ/sdL2), contributions of the heat absorption and the heat generation by the Thomson effect are cancelled out. According to numerical simulations in the frequency region, a sufficient cancelling-out effect is obtained for 1 Hz or above depending on the dimension of the thin metal wire. Moreover, sufficient thermal averaging is obtained, so that the heat generation caused by the Joule effect may also be assumed to be constant. At this frequency limit, Equation (3) may be simplified as Equation (4):
Then, a solution which meets the differential equation is determined to obtain Equation (5) as follows:
In the above Equation, the temperature TAC represents the temperature in units of K at the center of thin metal wire when the AC voltage VAC is applied thereto and D represents a coefficient for the Joule term.
In Equation (5), the first term corresponds to a temperature rise caused by the Joule heat generation and the second term corresponds to the initial temperature at the center of the thin metal wire with the temperature gradient provided to the thin metal wire. In other words, under the condition in which the frequency of the AC voltage applied is sufficiently high, the temperature distribution is such that the Thomson effect is canceled out and the temperature increase due to the Joule effect is just superimposed on the temperature gradient provided initially. Here, the temperature change ΔTAC when the AC voltage is applied is defined as in the following Equation (6):
As described below, when the initial temperature (T1+T2)/2 is measured in advance by a thermocouple, etc., this amount may be obtained experimentally by subtracting the above-mentioned temperature from the temperature at the time of applying the current.
In this way, the temperature change δT, or, in other words, a half of the temperature change in units of K at the midpoint of the thin metal wire when the polarity-inverted DC current is passed through the thin metal wire as in the above
Here, the denominator of Equation (7) is the product of the current I and the electrical resistance R (=2 ρ L/a) of the thin metal wire, corresponding to the DC voltage VDC, which is applied to the thin metal wire. In other words, the temperature difference caused by the Thomson effect shows that it is also proportional to the temperature gradient caused by the Joule effect in addition to the temperature gradient provided initially. Moreover, the larger the resistance of the thin metal wire, the smaller the temperature difference.
In the AC-DC method, as an AC voltage VAC whose effective value is equal to that of a DC voltage VDC is used, the above DC voltage VDC may be denoted as the AC voltage VAC, so that the latter is used for the notation.
In this way, when the AC voltage VAC, and the temperature change ΔTAC of the thin metal wire when the AC voltage VAC is applied thereto are substituted into Equation (7) to solve for the Thomson coefficient μ on the right hand, the Thomson coefficient calculation equation may be obtained as follows:
When Equation (8) is compared to Equation (1) derived by Nettleton, while values of the AC voltage VAC and the temperature increase ΔTAC of the thin metal wire when the AC voltage VAC is applied are needed, information on the geometric shape and the thermal conductivity of the thin metal wire that are difficult to measure accurately is not needed, so it is seen that the Thomson coefficient μ may be determined in principle.
Below, a thermophysical property measurement device and a thermophysical property measurement method for obtaining the Thomson coefficient using Equation (8), which is derived in this manner, are described in detail. The same letters in the present specification represent identical or similar parts.
Here, the user interface 51 has functions of accepting operation instructions of a user for the thermophysical property measurement device 50 and displaying generated data for the user to be able to recognize by visual inspection. Moreover, the storage device 53 stores programs executed by the operation device 54 and also stores data supplied via the bus 52. Moreover, the operation device 54 performs a predetermined operation on the supplied data by executing the programs stored in advance in the storage device 53. Then, as described in detail below, the measurement device 55 measures the thermoelectric properties included in the thin metal wire (below called “a metal sample”), etc.
Moreover, as shown in
Then, the metal sample 4, for example, is installed in the measurement device 55, which has the configuration as described above, as a subject to be measured.
Here, the measurement device 55 is designed such as to be able to sufficiently satisfy thermal boundary conditions in thermal analysis. More specifically, the interior of the chamber 1 is made to be a vacuum to suppress heat convection, while the metal blocks 2 and 3 of temperatures T1 and T2 are connected to the metal sample 4 to provide a temperature gradient thereto as described above at each end of the metal sample 4. These metal blocks 2 and 3 have the function of a heat bath and the temperature is monitored with the thermocouples 61 and 62 while using a Peltier element, etc., making it possible to realize an accurate temperature control.
It is possible to use a tubular furnace which makes ambience control possible as well as to use a stable heater as a method of providing the temperature gradient to the metal sample 4.
Moreover, at the center of the metal sample 4, the thermocouple 5 is mounted to measure the heat absorption and the heat generation that are caused by the Thomson effect as well as the heat generation caused by the Joule effect when an AC voltage is applied. Here, to reduce outflow of heat from the thermocouple 5, a thermocouple whose thermal conductance is sufficiently small at less than or equal to 100 μm is mounted and an output voltage from the thermocouple 5 is measured by a nanovolt DC voltmeter. The temperature may possibly be measured by using a radiation thermometer in a region of high temperature of more than or equal to 900K.
Moreover, between both ends of the metal sample 4, a DC-AC voltage generator 100 which makes it possible to generate DC voltages of different polarities and AC voltages whose effective values are equal to those thereof. Here, it suffices for the waveform of the alternating current generated by the AC power supply 8 to be periodic, which may be a sinusoidal wave, a rectangular wave, etc., for example. Here, the optimum frequency is closely associated with a thermal time constant of the metal sample 4 and differs in accordance with the dimension, material, etc., of the metal sample 4, so that it is necessary to determine the optimum frequency upon conducting an experiment.
Moreover, to suppress generation of an error caused by a temporal change (drift) of a reference voltage of the DC-AC voltage generator 100, the switch 9 turns on, in order, the AC power supply 8, the positive-polarity DC power supply 6, the negative-polarity DC power supply 7, and the AC power supply 8, an operation of which is to be described later in detail.
First, in step S1, the metal block 2 of temperature T1 and the metal block 3 of temperature T2 are installed on the respective ends of the metal sample 4. Next, in step S2, the thermocouple 5 is installed at the center of the metal sample 4 and, in step S3, the interior of the chamber 1 is made vacuum.
Then, in step S4, an AC voltage VAC is applied to both ends of the metal sample 4 to measure the temperature TAC1 at the center of the metal sample 4 with the thermocouple 5.
Next, in step S5, a positive-polarity DC voltage V+DC is applied to both ends of the metal sample 4 to measure the temperature T+DC at the center of the metal sample 4 with the thermocouple 5.
Then, in step S6, a negative-polarity DC voltage V−DC is applied to both ends of the metal sample 4 to measure the temperature T−DC at the center of the metal sample 4 with the thermocouple 5.
Then, as described above, the temperature distribution of the metal sample 4 when the positive-polarity DC voltage V+DC is applied to both ends of the metal sample 4 in step S5 is shown in a graph 30, while the temperature distribution of the metal sample 4 when the negative-polarity DC voltage V−DC is applied to both ends of the metal sample 4 in step S6 in a graph 20. Then, by passing the polarity-inversed current as described above, an effect of the Joule heat generated by the current is cancelled out, so that the temperature distribution of the metal sample 4 when there is no such effect as described above is shown with a graph 10, which is positioned between the graph 20 and the graph 30. Thus, when the DC voltage is applied to the metal sample 4, the temperature TDC at the midpoint when the effect caused by the current is filtered out may be evaluated as (T+DC+T−DC)/2. Here, the operation device 54 shown in
Next, the AC voltage VAC is again applied to both ends of the metal sample 4 in step S7 to measure the temperature TAC2 at the center of the metal sample 4 with the thermocouple 5.
Then, in step S8, the operation device 54 takes the difference between the temperature (TAC1+TAC2)/2 and the initial temperature Ts to calculate the temperature change ΔTAC.
Here,
The graph 11 shows an average value of the temperature distribution of the metal sample 4 when the AC voltage VAC is applied in steps S4 and S7, and, as shown in
Next, in step S9, the operation device 54 executes programs stored in advance in the storage device 53 to calculate the Thomson coefficient by Equation (8) using the obtained temperature change δ T and temperature change ΔTAC and calculate the absolute thermoelectric power of the metal sample 4 by Equation (2) using the calculated Thomson coefficient.
Next, in step S10, the operation device 54 calculates the thermal conductivity as follows using the Thomson coefficient calculated in step S9.
Equation (1) is solved for the thermal conductivity κ to obtain Equation (9) as follows:
Thus, the Thomson coefficient obtained in step S9 may be substituted into the right hand of Equation (9) to calculate the thermal conductivity of the metal sample 4. Here, there is a problem that, while the value of heat amount added is generally needed to calculate the thermal conductivity, it is difficult to accurately measure such a heat amount, so that it is not simple to obtain a highly accurate value. On the contrary, the above-described method may calculate the thermal conductivity using only the physical quantity which may be simply calculated, such as the temperature change at the center (midpoint) of the sample to be measured.
The values of the absolute thermoelectric power and the thermal conductivity that are calculated as described above are stored in the storage device 53 and the user interface 51 displays such values for the user of the thermophysical measurement device 50 to be able to recognize by visual inspection in accordance with predetermined operations instructions input by the user.
Moreover, the above-described thermoelectric power measurement method may achieve the same operational effects even when the subject to be measured is a metal, a semiconductor or a semimetal.
As described above, a thermoelectric measurement method and a thermoelectric measurement device according to embodiments of the present invention may accurately determine the Thomson coefficient μ using a simple scheme to easily and conveniently obtain accurate values of the absolute thermoelectric power and the thermal conductivity.
Then, accurate values of absolute thermoelectric power and thermal conductivity may be obtained to improve the accuracy and the reliability of existing thermophysical measurement devices and calculate values of thermoelectric power and thermal conductivity of new materials to achieve enhancement in the functionality of the existing thermophysical measurement devices, including the ability to realize a thermophysical property measurement device whose measurable temperature range is wider than that in the related art.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2013-172318 | Aug 2013 | JP | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/JP2014/065040 | 6/6/2014 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2015/025586 | 2/26/2015 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20090293928 | Liang | Dec 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
01-161140 | Jun 1989 | JP |
2003-014804 | Jan 2003 | JP |
2007-059462 | Mar 2007 | JP |
2010-199343 | Sep 2010 | JP |
2011-185697 | Sep 2011 | JP |
Entry |
---|
Blatt et al. (Thermoelectric Power of Metals. Plenim Press, 1976, pp. 1-6 and 57-63). |
Sasaki et al, “A numerical simulation of thermoelectric effects in single-Junction thermal converters.” IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, vol. 48, No. 2, 1999, pp. 408-411., doi:10.1109/19.769612. |
Harman, T. C., et al. “Measurement of Thermal Conductivity by Utilization of the Peltier Effect.” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 30, No. 9, 1959, pp. 1351-1359., doi:10.1063/1.1735334. |
Paul, “Simple apparatus for the multipurpose measurements of different thermoelectric parameters.” Measurement, vol. 45, No. 1, 2012, pp. 133-139., doi:10.1016/j.measurement.2011.09.007. |
International Search Report dated Sep. 9, 2014 in corresponding PCT International Application No. PCT/JP2014/065040. |
H.R. Nettleton “On the Measurement of the Thomson Effect in Wires,” Proc. Phys. Soc. London, pp. 59-81 (1916). |
R.B. Roberts, “The absolute scale of thermoelectricity,” Philosophical Magazine, vol. 36, No. 1, pp. 91-107 (1977). |
R.B. Roberts, “The absolute scale of thermoelectricity II,” Philosophical Magazine Part B, vol. 43, No. 6, pp. 1125-1135 (1981). |
R.B. Roberts et al., “The absolute scale of thermoelectricity III,” Philosophical Magazine Part B, vol. 52, No. 6, pp. 1147-1163 (1985). |
T. Nakamura et al., “Prototyping of AC method thermoelectric power measurement device,” Proceedings of Academic Conference of the Japan Society of Applied Physics, JST document No. Y0055A, vol. 52, No. 1, p. 41 (1991), (with English translation). |
A. Tamaki et al., “Prototyping of AC method thermoelectric measurement device and studies on thermoelectric power of rare-earth compounds,” Annual Report, Research Institute for Technology, Tokyo Denki University, JST document No. L0877A, No. 10, p. 167-172 (1991), (English translation of Abstract). |
Y. Amagai et al., “Study on Characterization of Thomson Coefficient Using AC Method toward the Absolute Scale of Thermoelectricity,” 2013 Nen Dai 74 Kai The Japan Society of Applied Physics Autumn Meeting Koen Yokoshu, Aug. 31, 2013, 20p-C13-7, (see International Search Report). |
M. Takimoto et al., “The Accurate Measurement of Absolute Thermoelectric Power,” Extended Abstracts, Japan Society of Applied Physics and Related Societies 1997 Spring 1, The Japan Society of Applied Physics, Mar. 28, 1997, p. 66, (see International Search Report). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160202196 A1 | Jul 2016 | US |