Patent Application
20190091111
The present invention relates to denture frames include at least one poly(ether ether) ketone polymer and at least one polyphenylsulfone polymer. The invention further relates to methods of making a denture frame. Still further, the invention relates to dentures incorporating denture frames.
Dentures are designed to replace missing teeth. Dentures generally consist of a removable plate (or frame) that holds one or more teeth. Traditionally, dentures include a metal frame, which is desirable due to the stress resistance, durability, and stain resistance of the material. However, the use of metal has numerous disadvantages such as undesirable aesthetics, stiffness, and weight, as well as design and manufacturing limitations that can lead to poor fit and patient discomfort or dissatisfaction. Attempts have been made to address some of the deficiencies of metal by making dental prostheses from a thermoplastic polymer such as a poly(ether ether ketone) polymer; however a need remains for dental prostheses with improved toughness, flexibility, color stability and dimensional stability, leading to improved product lifetimes.
Described herein are thermoplastic denture frames having significantly improved lifetimes as well as comfort. The general lifetime of a denture frame (and denture) is a function of both its aesthetic characteristics and its mechanical characteristics. The denture frames described herein include a polymer compositions including at least one poly(ether ether ketone) (“PEEK”) polymer and at least one polyphenylsulfone (“PPSU”) polymer. Aesthetically, it was surprisingly discovered that the polymer compositions have significantly improved color stability, relative to corresponding polymer compositions the including the at least one PEEK polymer as the only polymeric component of the polymer composition. Mechanically, the polymer compositions additionally have significantly improved toughness, flexibility and dimensional stability. The combination of the aesthetic characteristics and mechanical characteristics of the polymer compositions allows for denture frames having improved lifetimes and comfort.
The general lifetime of a denture frame is a function of both its aesthetic characteristics and its mechanical characteristics. With respect to aesthetics, given the desire for concealed use, the denture frames described herein have significantly improved aesthetic characteristics relative to denture frames including a corresponding polymer compositions including the at least one PEEK polymer as the only polymer. While dentures provide a biomechanical benefit (e.g. increased chewing ability), the aesthetic nature of the denture significantly impacts its customer appeal. For example, denture frames that take on a more natural appearance in the the oral environment into which they are inserted are highly preferable, as they help to conceal the presence of the denture frame itself. Denture design elements such as color matching, frame thickness and fitment, among other characteristics, help to conceal the denture when placed in the oral cavity. However, the oral cavity is a chemically harsh environment. Some types of common foods and drinks (e.g. coffee and wine) can be harsh staining agents, which come into contact with the denture (and, of course, the denture frame) during their intended and normal course of use. Despite cleaning, dentures eventually stain to an extent that they cannot be sufficiently cleaned to maintain desirable color matching, which makes the dentures more visibly apparent (less concealed). As noted above, the polymer compositions described herein have surprisingly improved color stability (e.g. anti-staining ability), which can prolong the usable lifetime of the denture frame and reduce the rate at which the dentures are replaced based on the staining of the denture frame.
With respect to mechanical performance, the oral environment is, additionally, a very demanding application setting. The masticatory force generated during routine mastication of food can be from about 70 Newtons (“N”) to 150 N, and up to 500 N to 700 N depending on the type of food and muscular size/density. The force is distributed along the anterior, general (covering the entire arch) and posterior parts of the arch formed by the teeth. At the locations of artificial teeth of the denture, the force is also at least partially transferred to the denture frame. Additionally, horizontal forces on the denture frame are generated during mastication by occlusal contact and by the oral musculature surrounding the denture during mastication. Such forces can displace the denture and denture frame in both antero-posterior and lateral directions as well as place tremendous impact forces on the denture frame. After repeated use, the denture frame can suffer mechanical failure. Relative to polymer compositions including only PEEK polymers, the polymer compositions have improved toughness and flexibility, allowing for denture frames having increased lifetimes due to increased mechanical performance.
Still further, the denture frames described herein have improved comfort, relative to denture frames having a polymer compositions including PEEK polymers alone. In conjunction with the improved mechanical properties described above, the polymer compositions described herein allow for denture frames having thinner components while maintaining desirable mechanical properties. Not only are the resulting denture frames lighter, the thinner components allow for denture frames less noticeable to the wearer with respect to feel. Moreover, as discussed in detail below, it was surprisingly found that the denture frames described herein, when fabricated using selected milling methods, had significantly improved dimensional stability, relative to corresponding denture frames fabricated with injection molding methods. Accordingly, patient fitment issues are reduced.
The denture frames include a polymer composition containing at least one PEEK polymer and at least one PPSU polymer. In some embodiments, the polymer composition further includes one or more additives. In some embodiments, each of the polymers in the polymer composition (or in the denture frame) is a PEEK polymer or a PPSU polymer.
As mentioned above, the polymer compositions have surprising color retention properties. In particular, relative to corresponding polymer compositions free of the PPSU polymer, the polymer compositions described herein have improved color retention. For clarity, a corresponding polymer composition is one in which the PPSU polymer is replaced with PEEK polymer. For example, if a polymer composition includes at least one PEEK polymer, at least one PPSU polymer and additives, the corresponding polymer composition is the one in which the at least one PPSU polymer is replaced with the at least one PEEK polymer.
In some embodiments, the denture frames consists essentially of the polymer composition, with respect to color stability or dimensional stability.
In some embodiments, the ratio of the concentrations of the at least one PEEK polymer to the at least on PPSU polymer can be 40/60 to 90/10, preferably 50/50 to 80/20, preferably 55/45 to 75/25, preferably 58/42 to 70/30, most preferably 63/37.
The polymer composition includes at least one PEEK polymer. As used herein, a PEEK polymer denotes any polymer having, relative to the total number of moles of recurring units, at least 50 mol % of a recurring unit (RPEEK) represented by the following formula:
where R1, at each instance, is independently selected from the group consisting of a halogen, an alkyl, an alkenyl, an alkynyl, an aryl, an ether, a thioether, a carboxylic acid, an ester, an amide, an imide, an alkali or alkaline earth metal sulfonate, an alkyl sulfonate, an alkali or alkaline earth metal phosphonate, an alkyl phosphonate, an amine and an quaternary ammonium; and i, at each instance, is an independently selected integer from 0 to 4. In some embodiments, each i is zero. For clarity, in Formulae (1), each of the benzene rings has 4-i ring carbons bonded to a hydrogen atom, where i is from 0 to 4, selected independently for each i in Formula (1). For example, referring to Formula (1), if i=1 for the left most benzyl ring, 3 of those benzyl carbons are bonded to a hydrogen and one is bonded to an R1. Analogous notation is used for the other formulae herein. In some embodiments, recurring unit (RPEEK) is represented by the following formula:
In some such embodiments, each i is zero.
In some embodiments, the PAEK polymer has at least about 60 mol %, at least about 70 mol %, at least about 80 mol %, at least about 90 mol %, at least about 95 mol % or at least about 99 mol % recurring unit (RPEEK), relative to the total number of moles of recurring units in the PEEK polymer. In some embodiments, the at least one PEEK polymer includes one or more recurring units (R*PEEK), in addition to recurring unit (RPEEK). Each of the one or more recurring units (R*PEEK) is represented by Formula (1) or (2), and is distinct from each of the other recurring units in the polymer. In such embodiments, the total concentration of the one or more recurring units (R*PEEK) and the recurring unit (RPEEK) is more than about 50 mol %, at least about 60 mol %, at least about 70 mol %, at least about 80 mol %, at least about 90 mol %, at least about 95 mol % or at least about 99 mol %, relative to the total number of moles of recurring units in the PEEK polymer.
In some embodiments, the concentration of the at least one PEEK polymer, relative to the total weight of the polymer composition, is at least about 30 wt. %, at least about 40 wt. %, at least about 50 wt. % or at least about 55 wt. %. Additionally or alternatively, the concentration of the at least one PEEK polymer, relative to the total weight of the polymer composition, is no more than about 80 wt. %, no more than about 75 wt. % no more than about 70 wt. % or no more than about 65 wt. %. The person of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that additional PEEK polymer concentrations within the explicitly disclosed ranges are contemplated and within the scope of the present disclosure. For clarity, in embodiments in which the at least one PEEK polymer includes a plurality of PEEK polymers, the total concentration of the PEEK polymers in the polymer composition is within the ranges described above.
The polymer compositions includes at least one PPSU polymer. As used herein, a PPSU polymer denotes any polymer having, relative to the total number of moles of recurring units, at least 50 mol % of a recurring unit (RPPSU) represented by the following formula:
where R2, at each instance, is independently selected from a halogen, an alkyl, an alkenyl, an alkynyl, an aryl, an ether, a thioether, a carboxylic acid, an ester, an amide, an imide, an alkali or alkaline earth metal sulfonate, an alkyl sulfonate, an alkali or alkaline earth metal phosphonate, an alkyl phosphonate, an amine, and a quaternary ammonium; and j, at each instance, is an independently selected integer from 0 to 4. Preferably each j is zero. In some embodiments, recurring unit (RPPSU) is represented by the following formula:
In some such embodiments, each j is zero.
In some embodiments, the PPSU polymer has at least about 60 mol %, at least about 70 mol %, at least about 80 mol %, at least about 90 mol %, at least about 95 mol % or at least about 99 mol % recurring unit (RPPSU), relative to the total number of moles of recurring units in the PPSU polymer. In some embodiments, the at least one PPSU polymer includes one or more recurring units (R*PPSU), in addition to recurring unit (RPPSU). Each of the one or more recurring units (R*PPSU) is represented by Formula (1) or (2), and is distinct from each of the other recurring units in the polymer. In such embodiments, the total concentration of the one or more recurring units (R*PPSU) and the recurring unit (RPEEK) is more than about 50 mol %, at least about 60 mol %, at least about 70 mol %, at least about 80 mol %, at least about 90 mol %, at least about 95 mol % or at least about 99 mol %, relative to the total number of moles of recurring units in the PPSU polymer.
In some embodiments, the concentration of the at least one PPSU polymer, relative to the total weight of the polymer composition, is at least about 10 wt. %, at least about 15 wt. %, at least about 20 wt. %, at least about 25 wt. % or at least about 30 wt. %. Additionally or alternatively, the concentration of the at least one PPSU polymer, relative to the total weight of the polymer composition, is no more than about 60 wt. %, no more than about 50 wt. %, no more than about 55 wt. %, no more than about 50 wt. %, no more than about 45 wt. % or no more than about 40 wt. %. The person of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that additional PPSU polymer concentration ranges within the explicitly disclosed ranges are contemplated and within the scope of the present disclosure. For clarity, in embodiments in which the at least one PEEK polymer includes a plurality of PEEK polymers, the total concentration of the PEEK polymers in the polymer composition is within the ranges described above.
As noted above, in some embodiments, the polymer composition can include one or more additives. The additives can be selected from the group consisting of ultraviolet light stabilizers, antioxidants, pigments, processing aids, lubricants, and radiopaque compounds (including, but not limited to, barium sulfate, bismuth trioxide, bismuth oxychloride, and bismuth subcarbonate.
Pigments can be particularly desirable additives in the polymer composition, to impart desirable aesthetic qualities to the denture frame. In light of the desire for surreptitious use, aesthetics are a significant consideration with respect to denture frames. The more the denture frame can be hidden from casual sight and the more the frame blends into the oral environment, the more concealed the use of the denture frame (and the ultimate denture). Pigments incorporated into the polymer composition of the denture frame to impart aesthetic qualities to help conceal use in the oral environment can include, but are not limited to, TiO2 (e.g. rutile, anatase or brookite) (white), coumarin (yellow), lapis lazul (blue) or any combination of two or more thereof. In embodiments in which the polymer composition includes a pigment, the total concentration of pigments, relative to the total weight of the polymer composition, can be at least about 0.1 parts per hundred by weight (“pph”), at least about 1 pph, at least about 1 pph, at least about 2 pph or at least about 3 pph. In some embodiments, the total concentration of pigments, relative to the total weight of the polymer composition, is no more than about 25 pph, no more than about 15 pph, no more than about 10 pph or no more than about 7 pph. A person of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that additional ranges of total pigment concentration within the explicitly disclosed ranges is contemplated and within the scope of the present disclosure.
Significantly, applicants discovered that inclusion of particulate additives at relatively high loading levels can cause premature breakage of the frame. One class of particulate additives is inorganic particles having an average primary particle diameter of 100 including, but not limited to, TiO2. Particulate additives have a general spherical appearance. Upon close examination, crystalline particulate additives, such as inorganic particles, have facets corresponding to the underlying crystal lattice, but nevertheless have roughly equivalent spatial dimensions from the geometric center. As described below, portions of the denture frames of interest herein are relatively thin (e.g. having a width less than 5 mm or even less than 2 mm). Frequent insertion and removal of the denture frame from the oral cavity, as well as mastication, during normal use places a significant amount of flexural strain on the denture frame. Applicant found that inclusion of particulate additives at relative high loading levels compromises the mechanical integrity of the denture frame and significantly reduces the lifetime of the denture frames. For the denture frames of interest herein, the total concentration of particulate fillers is less than about 30 wt. %, less than about 20 wt. %, less than about 10 wt. %, less than about 5 wt. %, less than about 2 wt. %, relative to the total weight of the polymer composition. The person of ordinary skill in the art will recognize additional particular filler concentrations within the explicitly disclosed ranges are contemplated and within the scope of the present disclosure.
In some embodiments, the particulate additives have an average primary particle diameter (length in the longest dimension of the particle) of from about 100 nanometers (“nm”) to about 5 micrometers (“μm”). In such embodiments, the particulate additives can have a distribution of particle diameters such that at least about 80%, at least about 95%, or at least 99% of the primary particles have a diameter greater than about 40% of the average diameter and less than about 700% of the average diameter. In further embodiments, the particulate additives can have a distribution in primary particle diameters such that at least about 80%, at least about 95%, or at least 99%, of the primary particles have a diameter greater than about 40% of the average diameter and less than about 300% of the average diameter. In alternative or additional embodiments, the particulate additives can have a distribution of primary particle diameters such that at least about 95% or at least 99% of the primary particles have a diameter greater than about 45% of the average diameter and less than about 200% of the average diameter. A person of ordinary skill in the art will recognize additional ranges of average primary particle diameter and primary particle diameter distributions within the explicitly disclosed ranges above are contemplated and within the scope of the present disclosure. Primary particle sizes (as well as average primary particle sizes and corresponding distributions) can be determined by transmission electron micrographs (“TEM”). For clarity, “primary” particle refers to the unagglomerated particle. Due to their small size, the primary particles tend to form agglomerates because of vad der Waals forces. Nevertheless, the primary particles can be clearly seen in TEM images.
In some embodiments, the polymer composition is free of a fibrous fillers. Fibrous fillers include, but are not limited to, glass fibers and carbon fibers. The presence of fibrous fillers in oral application settings can present health issues. Accordingly, in some embodiments, the polymer composition has less than about 10 wt. %, preferably less than 5 wt. % of a fibrous filler, relative to the total weight of the polymer composition.
The denture frames described herein are desirably fabricated using a milling approach. Desirable milling approaches involve cutting a blank including the polymer composition to produce the denture frame (also known as subtractive manufacturing or machine milling). Desirably, the blanks are formed by extruding the polymer composition into a basic shape (e.g. a rod) subsequently cutting the shape to have the desired thickness. Advantageously, the fabrication method is free of injection molding approaches with respect to blank or denture frame fabrication.
As mentioned above it was surprisingly found that denture frames including the polymer composition described herein, when fabricated using selected milling methods, had significantly improved dimensional stability, relative to corresponding denture frames fabricated with injection molding methods. In injection molding, the molten polymer composition is injected into a mold having an inner cavity forming the negative of the intended denture frame design or injection molded into a mold having an inner cavity forming a blank and subsequently milled into a denture frame (described in detail below). It was surprisingly found that the polymer composition of the denture frame fabricated with injection molding techniques exhibited significantly compromised dimensional stability and, correspondingly, the dimensional fidelity of the denture frame with its original, intended design. In at least some instances, the loss of fidelity resulted in eventual inadequate fitment of the denture frame to the extent that it was an unacceptable for use in the patient's mouth. On the other hand, denture frames fabricated using a milling approach had significantly increased dimensional stability and corresponding fidelity to the design of the denture frame.
A desirable milling approach involves cutting an extruded blank (as described below) formed from the polymer composition to produce the denture frame. During milling, a cutting tool is used to remove material of the blank to form the denture frame. In one embodiment, the cutting tool has cutting edges (e.g. a drill bit including, but not limited to, a router bit) that are contacted with the blank to remove material of the blank corresponding to the negative design of the denture frame. Based on the disclosure herein, the person of ordinary skill in the art will know how to select an appropriate cutting tool as well as use parameters such as rotation frequency and routing speed according the specific denture frame features and polymer composition. In other embodiments, a laser can be used as a cutting tool. Based on the disclosure herein, the person of ordinary skill in the art will know to appropriately select a laser and use parameters such as pulse rate and raster speed according to the specific denture frame features and polymer composition.
In some embodiments, the cutting tool can be desirably controlled using a computer processor. In such embodiments, the computer processor can be in electronic communication with one or more controllers that move the cutting tool and control its use parameters (e.g. rotation speed of a drill bit). The computer processor can also be in electronic communication with a memory (e.g. processor cache, random access memory or other physical memory including, but not limited to, a hard drive, a solid state drive, and universal serial bus storage) containing a digital representation of the denture frame. The computer processor can access the memory and control the positioning, as well as the use parameters of the cutting tool, to remove polymer composition from the blank and form the desired denture frame. Examples of such computer aided milling approaches include, but are not limited to, CAD/CAM, in which a computer aided design (“CAD”) software is used to create digital file containing a digital representation of the denture frame, readable by a computer processer, and a computer aided manufacturing (“CAM”) is used to read the digital file and control the cutting tool to fabricate the denture frame as described above according to the digital representation. Machines for implementing CAM methods moving the cutting tool or object to be milled in various directions. CAM machines can be 3-axis (corresponding to the 3 translation axes), 4-axis to 6-axis (3 translation axes+1 to 3 rotational axis) or 7-axis apparatuses. Five-axis and 7-axis CAM machines can be particularly desirable in light of the complicated design features of a denture frame. In some embodiments, the digital representation can be obtained using a digital file containing a digital representation of a patient's mouth, for example, obtain by a direct optical scan of the patient's mouth or an optical scan of a mold of a patient's mouth. Using the scan, the denture frame design (e.g. physical dimensions and features of the denture frame), and corresponding digital file, can be produced by using CAD.
The blank is a solid block of the polymer composition. The blank can be any shape or size suitable for use with a milling machine. In some embodiments, cylindrical blanks (also known as pucks) can be desirably used. In some such embodiments, the cylindrical blank has a thickness ranging from about 10 millimeters (“mm”) to about 70 mm or from about 15 mm to 60 mm, and a diameter ranging from about 20 mm, from about 40 mm or from about 70 mm to about 100 mm. The person of ordinary skill in the art will recognize additional ranges of thickness and diameter within the explicitly disclosed ranges are contemplated and within the scope of the present disclosure. The blank can be made by extruding the polymer composition. In some such embodiments, the polymer composition is extruded into rods having the desired diameter of the cylindrical blank and the rod is subsequently cut perpendicular to the direction of extrusion to form pucks have the desired thickness (“extruded blank”). In some embodiments, the polymer composition can be cut as it exits the extruder. In other embodiments, rods can be formed having a length larger than the blank and subsequently cut to form the cylindrical blanks. As noted above, while blanks may also be formed by injection molding the polymer composition into a mold having an inner cavity corresponding to the desired blank dimensions, denture frames milled from such blanks have significant dimensional instability.
In some embodiments, the denture frame is incorporated into a denture. The denture may be a complete denture that replaces all of a patient's teeth in a single arch (e.g. the maxillary (upper) or mandibular (lower) arch), or a partial denture, which replaces less than all of a patient's teeth in a single arch. Thus, when the denture is a partial denture, it is designed to accommodate a patient's existing teeth or implants. In some aspects, the denture is a partial removable denture that is designed to be regularly removed from the patient's mouth for cleaning.
Referring to
In some aspects, the dental prosthesis is a denture frame, preferably a partial removable denture frame. The denture frame may be formed from a single piece of plastic and may be free of metal. As used herein, a denture frame that is free of metal includes less than 1% of metal by weight of the denture frame. As used herein, “metal” means elemental metals or alloys thereof such as, for example, gold, silver, platinum, nickel, aluminium, stainless steel, etc.
In some embodiments, at least a portion of the polymer composition in the denture frame has a crystallinity greater than 21%, and the polymer composition includes less than 63 wt. % of the PAEK based on the total weight of the polymeric material, where the crystallinity is determined by measurement of the enthalpy of fusion from the second heat cycle by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) according to ASTM D3418-03, E1356-03, E793-06, and E794-06. Referring to
The denture frame may further include a finish line. Referring again to
Applicant found that, in conjunction with the polymer composition having improved flexibility and durability, denture frames having finish lines with a substantially flat inner surface have significantly improved structural integrity when incorporated into a denture including an artificial gum. As described above, a denture includes a denture frame having a finish line in contact with an artificial gum. The finish line has a tip, disposed towards the top of the denture frame, and a base, disposed towards the bottom of the denture frame. The two surfaces between the top and base of the finish line are referred to as the inner surface (the surface configured to contact the artificial gum when the denture frame is assembled into a denture) and the outer surface. The finish lines of interest herein have a substantially flat inner surface, which flexes with the artificial gum when in use in the mouth. Relative to finish line designs in which the inner surface is cupped to help to retain the artificial gum in the denture frame, the stress placed on the finish lines of interest herein resulting from flexing is significantly reduced, due to the substantially flat inner surface, as described in more detail below. As used herein, a substantially flat inner surface refers to a surface that is oriented within 20 degrees of an axis that is perpendicular to (i) to the base and (ii) the direction of the finish line; (“Reference Axis”). The inner surface is oriented within 20 degrees of the Reference Axis over at least 85% over the surface including the tip and extending towards the base. In some embodiments, the inner surface is oriented within 20 degrees of the Reference Axis over at least 90%, at least 95%, or at least 99% over the surface including the tip and extending towards the base. In some embodiments, the finish line has a linear distance from the tip to the base in a cross section of the finish line from about 0.5 mm to about 1.5 mm, over at least 90%, at least 95% or at least 99% of the length of the finish line. In some embodiments, the finish line has a substantially flat inner surface along at least 90%, at least 95%, or at least 99% of the length of the finish line. The length of the finish line is its length along the tip from endpoint to endpoint (e.g. start to finish).
The substantially flat surface can be further understood by looking at a cross section of the finish line perpendicular to its direction. The direction of the finish line can be determined by viewing a denture frame in a top down orientation. In such a perspective, the tip of the finish line traces out a curve. At any point along the finish line (e.g. the point at which a cross section is taken), its direction is oriented along the tangent line at that point.
With respect to the cross section of the finish line,
Referring to
The substantially flat inner surface allows greater flexing of the finish line without breaking, relative to alternative finish line designs. In particular, alternative finish lines having a cupped inner surface are widely used in thermoplastic denture frames, at least because (a) they help to hold the artificial gum in place and (b) they help to prevent food and other debris in the mouth from being trapped between the artificial gum and the finish line.
Finish lines incorporating a substantially flat inner surface can significantly reduce the risk of retention line and denture frame breakage. The substantially flat inner surface reduces the stress on the finish line upon flexing of the artificial gum, relative to a design having a cupped inner surface. Because the inner surface does not help to hold the artificial gum in place (e.g. at least partially due to the fact that surface is substantially flat), flexing of the finish line with flexing of the artificial gum is significantly reduced, reducing the stress placed on the finish line. In other words, in the absence of bonding to the retention grid, the artificial gum can be slidably released from the denture frame in a direction opposite from the retention grid (e.g. direction 522 in
The outer surface of the finish line is generally shaped to form a smooth transition from the base to the artificial gum. In some embodiments, the magnitude (absolute value of) the angle of the outer surface relative to the Reference Axis is less than that of the inner surface, over at least 80%, at least 90% or at least 95% of the region of the inner surface extending from the tip and towards the base. In such embodiments, the finish line has an asymmetric cross section in a plane perpendicular to the length of the finish line (e.g. the cross section lacks an axis of symmetry parallel to the Reference Axis). For example, referring again to
The denture frame may also include rests or clasps, which in the context of a partial removable denture frame, anchor the denture frame in the patient's mouth by friction fitting the denture frame to the patient's existing natural teeth or implants. Applicants have surprising found that denture frames made from the polymer composition exhibit increased toughness, flexibility, and dimensional stability allowing for the use of clasps and rests that improve fit and retention of the denture frame.
Referring again to
It was discovered that the increased flexibility and reduced brittleness of the polymer composition allows design of clasps that are more durable and fit farther into the undercut of a patient's existing teeth or implants to provide better fit and retention than has previously been possible with, for example, metal denture frames or denture frames having a corresponding polymer compositions containing PEEK as the only polymeric component of the polymer composition.
Referring again to
The invention will be now described in more detail with reference to the following examples, whose purpose is merely illustrative and not intended to limit the scope of the invention.
The following materials were used to prepare the Examples:
KetaSpire® PEEK KT-820 NL Q available from Solvay Specialty Polymers USA, L.L.C.
Radel® PPSU R-5000 NT and R-5100 P NT available from Solvay Specialty Polymers USA, L.L.C.
Titanium dioxide (TiO2)—Grade: TiPure® R105 available from Chemours.
Each formulation was melt compounded using a 26 mm diameter Coperion® ZSK-26 co-rotating partially intermeshing twin screw extruder having an L/D ratio of 48:1.
In each case, the resins and additives were fed at barrel section 1 using a gravimetric feeder at throughput rates in the range 30-40 lb/hr. The extruder was operated at screw speeds of around 200 RPM. Vacuum was applied at barrel zone 10 with a vacuum level of about 27 inches of mercury. A single-hole die was used for all the compounds and the molten polymer strand exiting the die was cooled in a water trough and then cut in a pelletizer to form pellets approximately 3.0 mm in length by 2.7 mm in diameter.
The example formulations were injection molded to produce 3.2 mm (0.125 in) thick ASTM tensile and flexural specimens for mechanical property testing. Type I tensile ASTM specimens and 5 in ×0.5 in ×0.125 in flexural specimens were injection molded.
Mechanical properties were tested using injection molded test specimens which consisted of 1) ISO bars 80×10×4 mm, and 2) 2×3×0.125 in plaques. The following test methods were employed in evaluating the compositions:
ASTM D-638: Tensile properties: tensile strength at yield, tensile modulus and tensile elongation at yield
ASTM D790: flexural properties
ASTM D792: density and specific gravity
ASTM D256: Notched Izod impact resistance
The results of the mechanical testing are shown below in Table 1.
The dimensional stability of denture frames made from extruded and injection molded cylindrical blanks of the composition of Example 3 was assessed.
The composition of Example 3 was injection molded into cylindrical blanks (i.e. blanks) measuring 98 mm in diameter and 18 mm in thickness. Blanks of identical size were also prepared by extruding of a rod of the composition of Example 3 and cutting the rod to form extruded blanks.
A mandibular impression was taken of a patient's teeth, from which a plaster cast was prepared. The plaster cast was scanned using a 3Shape D750 Lab Scanner to create an electronic model of the patient's teeth. A denture frame was designed using a computer employing CAD/CAM technology and identically-shaped denture frames were milled from each blank. Following milling, the fit of each denture frame was assessed on the cast model by visual inspection. A framework was considered seated when all rests on the denture frame came into full contact with their rest seats on the cast model. Each denture frame fit well on the cast model directly after milling. After approximately 24 hours, the fit of each denture frame was reassessed by visual inspection. While the denture frames milled from extruded blanks continued to exhibit good fit, the denture frames milled from injection molded blanks were found to have distortions of over 2 mm from their original dimensions, rending the frames unusable.
Accordingly, it was unexpectedly discovered that dimensional stability is increased and fit is maintained when the denture frames are milled from extruded blanks as compared with injection molded blanks.
The color stability of the compositions of Example 3 and Comparative Example C1 after exposure to coffee (a typical staining agent found in the oral environment) was evaluated using a modified AL-PCL-MEC-LTM-077 test method.
Six test specimens in the form of color chips were prepared from each of the materials by injection molding.
A coffee staining solution was prepared by adding 20 g Nescafe Clasico™ dark roast coffee, available from Nestle, to 1000 ml of boiling distilled water.
Color change for each specimen was evaluated using an XRite® Color i7800 spectrophotometer. The spectrophotometric reflectance was measured from 360-750 nm, with measurements on each test specimen made in triplicate.
Each specimen was conditioned by placing it in distilled water at 37+/−1° C. for 24 hours before spectrophotometric data was collected as a baseline measurement. Following conditioning, three test specimens of each material were soaked in the coffee staining solution, and the remaining three specimens were soaked in distilled water as a control, at 37+/−1° C. for 30 days. The test specimens were removed after 30 days and analyzed with the spectrophotometer. Each test specimen was cleaned by placing it in a Ney Ultrasonic 28B cleaner for 10 minutes at room temperature (21° C.). The cleaning solution was Ultrasonic Solution #4 Tartar and Stain Remover available from Quala Dental Products. Spectral analysis was also performed following cleaning.
The color was measured according to the CIE 1976 L-a-b coordinates standard where the L* coordinate represents the lightness (black to white) scale, the a* coordinate represents the green-red chromaticity and the b* scale represents the blue-yellow chromaticity. Delta E [ΔE=((ΔL)2+(Δa)2+(Δb)2)½] values were calculated from the spectrophotometer results as the difference between each reading and the baseline measured after conditioning and prior to staining. The ΔE value was used to assess the color stability, with higher values indicating a higher level of staining.
The results of the color stability testing are shown below in Table 2.
As shown in Table 2, the compositions of Example 3 and Comparative Example 1 each exhibited increased staining after 30 days in the coffee staining solution as shown by the ΔEs of 17.557 and 5.861, respectively. After cleaning, however, the composition of Example 3 unexpectedly exhibited a significantly greater reduction in staining and a lower ΔE than the composition of Comparative Example 1.
Should the disclosure of any patents, patent applications, and publications which are incorporated herein by reference conflict with the description of the present application to the extent that it may render a term unclear, the present description shall take precedence.
1. A denture frame comprising:
a polymer composition comprising:
wherein the at least one PEEK polymer is represented by either one of the following formulae:
where R1, at each instance, is independently selected from the group consisting of a halogen, an alkyl, an alkenyl, an alkynyl, an aryl, an ether, a thioether, a carboxylic acid, an ester, an amide, an imide, an alkali or alkaline earth metal sulfonate, an alkyl sulfonate, an alkali or alkaline earth metal phosphonate, an alkyl phosphonate, an amine and an quaternary ammonium; and i, at each instance, is an independently selected integer from 0 to 4, preferably each i is zero and
wherein the at least one PPSU polymer is represented by either one of the following formulae:
where R2, at each instance, is independently selected from a halogen, an alkyl, an alkenyl, an alkynyl, an aryl, an ether, a thioether, a carboxylic acid, an ester, an amide, an imide, an alkali or alkaline earth metal sulfonate, an alkyl sulfonate, an alkali or alkaline earth metal phosphonate, an alkyl phosphonate, an amine, and a quaternary ammonium; and j, at each instance, is an independently selected integer from 0 to 4, preferably each j is zero.
13. The denture frame of any one of inventive concepts to 12, wherein the concentration of the at least one PEEK polymer, relative to the total weight of the polymer composition, is at least about 30 wt. %, at least about 40 wt. %, at least about 50 wt. % or at least about 55 wt. % and is no more than about 80 wt. %, no more than about 75 wt. % no more than about 70 wt. % or no more than about 65 wt. %.
14. The denture frame of any one inventive concepts 1 to 13, wherein the concentration of the at least one PPSU polymer, relative to the total weight of the polymer composition, is at least about 10 wt. %, at least about 15 wt. %, at least about 20 wt. %, at least about 25 wt. % or at least about 30 wt. % and is no more than about 60 wt. %, no more than about 50 wt. %, no more than about 55 wt. %, no more than about 50 wt. %, no more than about 45 wt. % or no more than about 40 wt. %.
15. The denture frame of any one of inventive concepts 1 to 14, wherein the total concentration of pigments, relative to the total weight of the polymer composition, is at least about 0.1 parts per hundred by weight (“pph”), at least about 1 pph, at least about 1 pph, at least about 2 pph or at least about 3 pph and no more than about 25 pph, no more than about 15 pph, no more than about 10 pph or no more than about 7 pph.
16. A method of forming a denture frame, the method comprising:
milling the denture frame of any one of inventive concepts 1 to 16 from a blank comprising a polymer composition.
17. The method inventive concept 16, wherein the blank comprises a cylindrical blank.
18. The method of inventive concept 17, wherein the cylindrical blank has a thickness from about 10 mm to about 70 mm and a diameter about 20 mm to about 100 mm.
19. The method of inventive concept 18, further comprising fabricating the blank, wherein the fabricating comprises extruding the polymer composition into a rod having a diameter from about 20 mm to about 100 mm and cutting the rod to form the cylindrical blank.
20. The method of any one of inventive concepts 16 to 19, wherein the milling comprising milling the blank using a computer-aided manufacturing (“CNC”) machine to form the denture frame.
21. The method of inventive concept 20, wherein:
the CNC machines includes a computer processor in electronic communication with a memory;
the computer processor accesses the memory to read a digital file comprising a digital representation of the patient's mouth; and
the CNC guides a cutting tool according to the digital representation of the patient's mouth to remove material from the blank and to form the denture frame.
22. The method of inventive concept 21, further comprising creating the digital representation of the patient's mouth, wherein the creating comprises performing an optical scan of the patient's mouth.
23. The method of inventive concept 21, further comprising creating the digital representation of the patient's mouth, wherein the creating comprising performing an optical scan of a mold of the patient's mouth.
24. The method of any one of inventive concept claims 21 to 23, wherein the cutting tool comprises a drill bit or a laser.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 16171913.3 | May 2016 | EP | regional |
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/299,657, filed Feb. 25, 2016; U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/421,532, filed Nov. 14, 2016; and European Patent Application number EP 16171913.3, filed May 30, 2016, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/299,657, filed Feb. 25, 2016. each of which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/EP2017/054531 | 2/27/2017 | WO | 00 |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 62421532 | Nov 2016 | US | |
| 62299657 | Feb 2016 | US |
