The invention in at least one embodiment relates to a system and/or a method for detecting when an individual may be under and/or about to be under thermoregulatory stress based, in part, on skin temperature complexity. An example system includes a heart rate sensor and a skin temperature sensor providing physiological signals to a processor. In a more particular embodiment, the invention provides a thermoregulatory strain index (TSI) or TSI score for the individual based on the skin temperature signal complexity and the heart rate complexity (or, alternatively, the mean heart rate) over a predetermined measurement window, which in at least one embodiment is adjustable. In a further embodiment, the TSI uses a difference between the resting complexity (or an approximation) and the current complexity for the skin temperature and/or the heart rate. In at least one embodiment, TSI uses a ratio of the skin temperature complexity to the heart rate complexity or vice versa for the individual, which in a further embodiment may be normalized for an individual using the individual's resting skin temperature and heart rate complexities, and in a further embodiment using maximum and minimum complexities across a particular population.
Hot environments pose a risk of heat illness to athletes and people in occupations where heavy workloads and/or protective clothing ensembles are necessary. Excessive heat strain can lead to collapse or even death. Heat-related illness (HRI) has a spectrum of disorders due to environmental heat exposure and includes minor conditions such as heat rash, heat cramps, heat syncope, rhabdomyolysis, and heat exhaustion as well as the more severe condition known as heat stroke. The treatment of HRIs can lead to unnecessary and expensive medical care, loss of work or training days, lower effectiveness and readiness of employment staff, and impact on the individual that suffers the HRI.
HRI is an ever-present threat to athletes, military personnel, and occupational hazard workers, as the combination of physical exertion in hot environments makes individuals susceptible to heat stroke, heat exhaustion, and heat cramps. HRI prevention includes avoiding medications that can increase the risk of heat illness (e.g., antihypertensives, diuretics, and anticholinergics), gradual adjustment to heat, and sufficient fluids and electrolytes. Mild HRI can be treated by drinking fluids. In more significant HRI cases, spraying with mist and using a fan is useful. For those with severe HRI putting them in lukewarm to cold water is recommended, if possible, with transport to a hospital.
HRI incidence risk is heightened when performing hard physical labor, or when weather or clothing impair heat loss. In 2018, there were 578 reported cases of heat stroke (0.45 cases per 1000) and 2,214 cases of heat exhaustion (1.71 cases per 1000) in the US military (Medical Surveillance Monthly Report (2019)). Between 2016-2020, there were over 12,484 HRI events at US military facilities with 2,615 of these cases being exertional heat strokes of which 475 exertional heat strokes were in 2020 (Heat Illness, Active Component, U.S. Armed Forces, 2020). One mitigation strategy is to modify training intensity or clothing to reduce the chance of excessive thermal strain; however, this is not always possible. As such it would be beneficial to identify individuals with impending heat illness early.
Ingestible pills that sense temperature are available to measure internal body temperature in real-time. However, they remain relatively expensive for day-to-day monitoring and administratively burdensome, particularly in situations where large groups are participating in an event and are to be monitored. The Estimated Core Temperature (ECTemp™) algorithm introduced by Buller et al. (2013) predicts body core temperature from heart rate alone, and it has been validated under a variety of conditions from temperate to hot climates, different clothing configurations (shorts and t-shirt to full personal protective equipment encapsulation (Buller et al. 2015)), and work intensities ranging from rest (Sim et al. 2016) to greater than 650 W (Buller et al. 2013).
Efforts to identify and control the incidence of heat illness/injury originally focused on identifying high risk environments and modifying work/rest schedules. Although the risk of HRI can be reduced by acclimation, appropriate work rest schedules, and proper hydration, the risk is never entirely abated when there is heavy exertion in a hot environment.
Assessing risk of heat stress from environmental conditions alone fails to account for individual differences, such as acclimation status, fitness, body composition and morphology, prior heat injury, which can play a role in an individual's response to working in hot environments and clothing.
Personal physiological monitoring is one means of overcoming the limitations of assessing thermal strain using environment monitoring alone. Modern physiological monitoring systems are becoming more common for monitoring applications; however, current measures or indices of heat strain (e.g., Physiological Strain Index, adaptive Physiological Strain Index, estimates of core temperature monitoring etc.) track well to overall level of strain but only provide a measure of general risk to succumbing to an HRI. While, this is useful it does not provide a specific risk of an individual succumbing to an HRI. What is needed is an index or measure of how well or not an individual is coping with a given heat strain and/or have an earlier indication that the individual may succumb to an HRI with time to prevent and/or lessen the risk of long-term effect of an HRI on the individual.
Skin temperature (Tsk) measures, along with core temperature (Tcr), and heart rate (HR) are all interrelated in the human thermoregulatory system. ECTemp core temperature estimates make use of the dual information in the heart rate of the cardiac output supplying fuel and oxygen to the muscles and the volume of blood used for heat transfer through vasodilation (Buller 2015). Similarly, the gradient between skin temperature and core temperature can provide an overall indication of the overall cardiac output (Sawka and Young 2006), and has been used in an adaptive physiological strain index (aPSI) (Buller, PCT Pub. No. WO 2017/181195 A1). In many instances of exercising in the heat skin blood flow and sweating are a major component of heat loss. Under extreme conditions of exercise and heat there can be conflicting demands for physiological resources and these may be manifested in the thermoregulatory control mechanism of skin blood flow. Previous work has utilized complexity measures to examine the state of control mechanisms. A change in heart rate variability has long been viewed as a tool to indicate a pathological change in an underlying control mechanism that correlates to a disease pathology (Shaffer F & Ginsberg JP (2017) and Ahmad et al. (2009)). Similarly, complexity of the core temperature and skin temperature relationship has been examined as a means to predict mortality and fever in patients (Varela et al. 2009).
One advantage of the invention over existing approaches to calculating a thermoregulatory strain index using core temperature is that a determination of whether the individual is coping can be detected based on a skin temperature complexity twenty (20) minutes earlier than a difference in core temperature is found, which provides an improvement in an earlier warning of the risk of HRI before current approaches. This suggests that the skin temperature complexity could be a useful tool in monitoring high intensity exercise sessions, providing useful insight into thermoregulatory control responses of the strain the thermoregulatory system is experiencing. In at least one embodiment, the heart rate complexity and skin temperature complexity are used in an TSI to identify individuals who are coping or not coping with exercise and heat strain.
Work by the inventors demonstrated that rather than absolute values or differences, time-based skin temperature complexity in conjunction with heart rate complexity was able to distinguish between two groups of people: those that appeared to be coping with heat strain and those that were not, in advance of obvious differences in core temperature, skin temperature and heart rate. In at least one embodiment, the invention utilizes heart rate and skin temperature signals from a physiological sensor(s) (or monitor(s)) to determine a TSI or TSI score. In at least one embodiment, the complexity of both the heart rate and skin temperature signals are used in a TSI.
One way to determine complexity is using Approximate Entropy (APEN—complexity score), alternatively other complexity approaches could be used in place of APEN. Without APEN norms or an alternative means of calculating a complexity score for skin temperature it is difficult to use the absolute numbers to conclude what is happening with the skin temperature control. A study with the participants being UK Royal Marines Commandos found that the participants fell into two groups: a HOT group that suffered from or were at risk of HRI and a WARM group that was below the HRI threshold. The difference in the scores between these groups could have two causes, either of which or both could provide insight. First, lower skin temperature APEN scores, and thus reduced complexity, in the WARM group could suggest that WARM group skin temperature is more actively controlled as a response to both the exercise and heat stress resulting in homeostatically controlled core temperature. Second, higher skin temperature APEN scores, and thus an increase in complexity, for the HOT group could suggest that skin temperature is less well controlled. This lower control could be due to the competing demands of the heat stress, exercise intensity, and maintenance of blood pressure. Thus, less active control, with less blood flow to the skin would lead to an increasing divergence in the core temperature and the skin temperature, as seen in the hot group.
The described methods and systems make use of skin temperature complexity over a predetermined measurement window as compared to heart rate complexity or alternatively with a mean heart rate over that same window. In at least one embodiment, that predetermined measurement window is adjustable, a sliding/moving measurement window, and/or 20 or 25 minutes in length. As discussed in this disclosure, TSI may take different forms including ratios, normalized, and complexity differences between rest and the current time. In at least one embodiment, the ratio of skin temperature complexity to the heart rate complexity provides a TSI as follows:
where TSI is thermoregulatory strain index, Tsk_c is skin temperature complexity, and HR_c is heart rate complexity. In this embodiment, higher values assume greater complexity and lower values assume lower complexity. In an example embodiment using APEN, TS values less than or equal to 1 indicates “coping” while TS values greater than 1 indicate increased levels of strain where the individual's thermoregulatory system is not coping with the thermal work strain it is experiencing. In an alternative embodiment, the ratio can be illustrated-by
In an example embodiment using APEN, TS values greater than or equal to 1 indicates “coping” while TS values less than 1 indicate increased levels of strain where the individual's thermoregulatory system is not coping with the thermal work strain it is experiencing.
In an alternative embodiment, the TSI represents anti-rest or the inverse of the rest response. Thus, the lower heart rate complexity combine with the increased skin temperature complexity equals an increase in thermoregulatory strain as reflected by
where, for example, STcomprest=0.4 and is the skin temperature complexity during sleep or rest, HRcomprest=0.9 and is the HR complexity during sleep or rest, STcompt is the current skin temperature complexity, and HRcompt is the current heart Rate complexity. The scaling by 10 puts the index on a roughly 0 to 10 range commonly used for physiological strain index (PSI) scale. In an alternative embodiment, the complexity differences are used in the ratio embodiments discussed above.
In a further embodiment, the method includes individualizing the skin temperature and heart rate complexity scores to an individual's resting complexity values and further to normalize the scale to a simple 0 to 10 index that is the common scale for physiological strain indexes based on the work by Moran. By normalizing to the Moran PSI scale, the output is in a form that may easily be an input into other systems and/or is in a form that is commonly worked with by this field. The individualization embodiments are illustrated by:
where TSI is the thermoregulatory strain index; Tskct is the current skin temperature complexity, Tskc0 is an initial skin temperature complexity, either taken at rest or at the start of exercise (or activity); HRct is the current heart rate complexity, and HRc0 is the initial heart rate complexity taken either at rest or at the beginning of exercise (or activity). In at least one embodiment, Tskcmax is an upper limit of complexity chosen such that when an individual has this complexity their TSI score is expected to be a 10. Similarly in at least one embodiment, HRcmin is the minimum heart rate complexity chosen such that when an individual reaches this minimum their TSI score would be expected to be 10. In at least one embodiment, the HRcmin and the Tskcmin are set based on appropriate bounds for a particular population, and as such is predetermined. In a further embodiment, the HRcmin and the Tskcmin are adjusted for the individual or a safety margin.
In another method embodiment, a mean heart rate is used instead of heart ratio complexity with the ratio being compared to a logistic regression 50% decision boundary and if the comparison shows the combination of skin temperature complexity and mean heart rate to the left of the boundary corresponding to a value less than 50%, then informing the individual and/or another person that the individual is coping. If the comparison falls to the right of the boundary corresponding to a value greater than 50%, then informing the individual and/or another person that the individual is not coping. If the comparison falls along (or approximate to) the boundary, then providing an inclusive result or, alternatively, the boundary line is grouped with coping or not coping depending on the implementation.
One method includes the generation of a time series of heart rate measurements and skin temperature measurements for an individual by one or more medical sensors, e.g., a chest belt physiological monitoring system, a wrist-worn physiological monitoring system, a heart rate monitor, an electrocardiogram (ECG or EKG) monitor, a temperature sensor, a temperature thermistor, an infrared sensor, etc. During or after generation of the series of measurements for the window, determining complexity of the data series with a processor that receives the data series. In at an alternative embodiment, the processor receives the heart rate measurements and/or the skin temperature measurements for conversion in a time series of data. Determining a level of thermoregulatory strain based on the ratio of the skin temperature complexity and the heart rate complexity. The thermoregulatory strain level can be provided and/or displayed to the individual, another person, and/or an automated system to intervene when indicated by the TSI.
The TSI provides an indication of how well a particular individual is coping with their thermal work strain and thus their likelihood of succumbing to an exertional heat injury (EHI) or an HRI as compared to an overall general risk across a population or sub-grouping of that population. Early prediction of an EHI/HRI allows for earlier interventions and potentially less risk, less disruption, less long-term impact, and/or less expense associated with the EHI/HRI.
The different embodiments of this invention share the concept and use of skin temperature complexity to gauge whether an individual is coping or not with physical exertion in their current environment. In several embodiments, the invention uses a heart rate complexity with the skin temperature complexity to determine a TSI, which in other embodiments, a heart rate mean is used in place of the heart rate complexity. In a further embodiment, the difference in rest complexity with the current time complexity is used to determine the TSI. In a further embodiment, the heart rate complexity and the skin temperature complexity are normalized using a resting heart rate complexity and a resting skin temperature complexity to bring the TSI into the original PSI levels and the associated levels of thermal work strain proposed by Moran et al. (1998), and PSI or a variant is widely used for determining thermal work strain.
Based on study data, using skin temperature complexity over a 20 minute or 25 minute window leads to an earlier indicator of whether the individual will cope or not cope than is possible with the core temperature-based PSIs where the core temperature is the internal core body temperature for the individual. The earlier warning allows for the individual to adjust the pace of activity, consume liquid (e.g., water) to cool down, remove a clothing layer(s), take a break, and/or make other adjustments or interventions.
The processor 210 determines a skin temperature complexity based on the skin temperature time series, 106. The processor 210 determines a heart rate complexity based on the heart rate time series, 108. The complexities may be computed using any number of complexity measures such as Approximate Entropy (APEN or ApEn), sample entropy, Shannon Entropy, Fuzzy Entropy, Multiscale Entropy, Renyi entropy, Kolmogorov complexity, entropy, or other statistical analyses for physiological data. Each of these approaches requires a time series of data points, for example 100 or more data points. In at least one embodiment, utilizing the APEN approach, a similarity time window size is set to a minimum of 2 time points but can be increased to the number of time points in the window, and the similarity input was set to 0.2 standard deviation (SD) of the measured computed across all time points, this setting can also be varied to include greater or smaller differences in the approximate entropy calculation. As an alternative, the sample entropy approach will provide better complexity numbers while likely avoiding the biases present in the APEN approach. It is preferred to use the same complexity approach for both skin temperature and heart rate to streamline the processing. In at least one embodiment, steps 106 and 108 can be performed in a different order and/or substantially simultaneous or substantially concurrently with each other.
The time series of data (i.e., skin temperatures and heart rates) is taken over a predetermined measurement window representing a time length between 5 and 30 minutes with or without the end points, between 5 and 25 minutes with or without the end points, between 10 and 25 minutes with or without the end points, between 15 and 25 minutes with or without the end points, between 17.5 and 22.5 minutes with or without the end points, between 1 and 15 minutes with or without the end points, 5 minutes, about 8 minutes, 10 minutes, 15 minutes, 20 minutes, 25 minutes, or 30 minutes. In a further embodiment, after an end of the predetermined measurement window is reached, the method will continue to determine one or both of the skin temperature and heart rate complexities using a rolling (or moving) window having the same length or shorter length of the predetermined measurement window to provide complexities on which to calculate a series of TSI scores. In a further embodiment, the complexities are measured every 30 seconds, minute, two minutes, or five minutes (although a different frequency is possible) to produce a continuous plot of the individual's TSI and/or complexities to allow for trends to be detected. In another prototype application of the method, a rolling window of 25 minutes was used with skin temperature being measured every 15 second (i.e., 100 samples) and heart rate being sampled in 5 second increments leading to 300 samples, but this allowed for the complexities to be taken over the same window to reflect the physiological response to heat and/or activity and avoids data mismatch from using different time windows. The sampling frequencies for skin temperature and heart rate could be adjust to have a similar number of measurements over the selected time window. For example, if the sampling rate for skin temperature was increased, the time window could be shortened. In an alternative embodiment, a shorter predetermined measurement window is used to start before the rolling window is lengthened with each measurement until a desired rolling window length is reached. This alternative embodiment would be advantageous as for more intense activity and/or hotter environments. Using a shorter predetermined measurement window throughout the monitoring would be advantageous when the planned activity is of a shorter duration.
The processor 210 calculates the TSI score for the individual based on the skin temperature complexity and the heart rate complexity, 110. In at least one embodiment, the TSI score is determined based exclusively on a ratio of these two complexities. In an alternative embodiment, the differences between the skin temperature complexity at rest and the time of measurement and between the heart rate complexity at rest and the time of measurement are used.
In at least one embodiment, the ratio can be determined by
where TSI is thermoregulatory strain index, Tsk_c is skin temperature complexity, and HR_c is heart rate complexity. In this embodiment, higher values assume greater complexity and lower values assume lower complexity. In an example embodiment using APEN, TSI scores is less than or equal to 1 indicates the individual is coping with the current thermal work strain while TSI scores is greater than 1 indicate increased levels of thermoregulatory strain where the individual's thermoregulatory system is not coping with the thermal work strain it is experiencing.
In an alternative embodiment, the ratio is flipped and is determined by
In an example embodiment using APEN, TSI scores is greater than or equal to 1 indicates the individual is coping with the current thermal work strain while TSI scores less than 1 indicate increased levels of strain where the individual's thermoregulatory system is not coping with the thermal work strain it is experiencing.
In an alternative embodiment to either of the above illustrated ratios, the difference between the rest complexity (comprest) and the current complexity (compt) at time t is used instead for TSI as illustrated below
where
is the heart rate complexity at rest or sleeping and
is the skin temperature complexity at rest or sleeping.
In an alternative embodiment, the TSI score is based on the differences in each of the complexities between rest and the current time t. In at least one embodiment, the rest complexities are set based on group data instead of measured data for that individual. The rest complexity is when the individual is resting or sleeping. The relationship according to at least one embodiment is illustrated below
where STcomprest is the skin temperature complexity during sleep or rest, HRcomprest is the heart rate complexity during sleep or rest, Stcompt is the current skin temperature complexity at time t, and HRcompt is the current heart rate complexity at time t. The scaling by 10 puts the index on a roughly 0 to 10 range commonly used for PSI scores and allows for use in existing systems and methods that use a PSI score. An increasing TSI represents an increasing strain on the thermoregulatory system. In an alternative embodiment, there is no scaling or different scaling is used.
In alternative embodiment, the TSI score is determined based on the skin temperature complexity and a mean heart rate for the predetermined measurement window where the mean heart rate takes the place of the heart rate complexity, which means instead of the heart rate complexity being determined the heart rate mean is determined, 108. The ratio of the skin temperature complexity to the heart rate mean is compared to a logistic regression 50% decision boundary and if the comparison shows the combination of the skin temperature complexity and the mean heart rate to the left of the boundary, then informing the individual and/or another person that the individual is coping. If the comparison falls to the right of the boundary, then informing the individual and/or another person that the individual is not coping. If the comparison falls along the boundary, then providing an inclusive result.
The processor then provides the calculated TSI score, 112. The calculated TSI score may be provided to a display, a memory, a transmission system for relaying to an external device or system, and an alarm or, alternatively, producing a signal. The discussed TSI's provide an improved and earlier indication of the current physiological strain of the individual being monitored, and would allow for an activity or pace change by the individual, if possible, to lower the physiological strain before it is possible with current approaches based on the individual's core temperature. As illustrated in
In a further embodiment, repeating the receiving (102 and 104), determining (106 and 108), calculating (110) and providing (112) steps at predetermined intervals, 114. Examples of predetermined intervals include 1 minute intervals, 5 minute intervals, 10 minute intervals, 15 minute intervals, 20 minute intervals, 30 minute intervals, 45 minute intervals, hour intervals, length of intervals between 1 minutes and 30 minutes with or without the end points, and length of intervals between 10 minutes and 2 hours with or without the end points. In a further example of the predetermined interval, the predetermined interval is equal to a fraction of the length of time of the current activity is expected to last and further such that it is proximate to any of the predetermined interval examples. In at least one embodiment, when the interval window is shortened, a similar adjustment is made to the length of the rolling window. The predetermined intervals are examples of substantially, continuously producing new TSI scores using a rolling window.
In a further embodiment, the method includes setting or selecting the predetermined interval prior to calculating the TSI score. In at least one further embodiment, a timer (or timer circuit or timing circuit) 340 illustrated in
In at least one further embodiment, when the TSI score exceeds a predetermined alarm threshold (e.g., a TSI score that indicates action is needed), an alert is generated by an alarm 450 of
In a further embodiment, the method includes individualizing the skin temperature and heart rate complexity scores to an individual's resting values and further to normalize the scale to a simple 0 to 10 index that is the common scale for PSIs based on previous heat strain scales such as the Moran PSI. By normalizing to the Moran PSI scale, the output is in a form that may easily be an input into other systems and/or is in a form that is commonly worked with by this field. Table 1 shows the original PSI levels and the associated levels of thermal work strain according to Moran et al. (1998):
The individualization embodiments may use the following relationship to normalize the thermoregulatory strain to the PSI:
where TSI is the thermoregulatory strain index; Tskct is the current skin temperature complexity, Tskc0 is an initial skin temperature complexity, either taken at rest or at the start of exercise; HRct is the current heart rate complexity, and HRc0 is the initial heart rate complexity taken either at rest or at the beginning of exercise. In at least one embodiment, Tskcmax is an upper limit of complexity chosen such that when an individual has this complexity their TSI score is expected to be a 10. Similarly in at least one embodiment, HRcmin is the minimum heart rate complexity chosen such that when an individual reaches this minimum their TSI score would be expected to be 10. In at least one embodiment when the difference of complexities for the skin temperature and/or the heart rate is negative, then that term becomes zero as illustrated in the equation above. In at least one embodiment, the HRcmin and the Tskcmax are set based on appropriate bounds for a particular population, and as such is predetermined. Using study data, like that discussed infra, these complexities can be set using, for example, the 95% or 97.5% measurements. It is envisioned that these numbers could be adjusted in a manner similar to estimating maximum heart rate for a person based on age (i.e., 220−age). In a further embodiment, the HRcmin and the Tskcmin are adjusted for the individual based on previous testing to determine these complexities or a safety margin.
In at least one embodiment as illustrated, for example in
In at least one embodiment of the previous embodiments, for example as illustrated in
In at least one further embodiment to any of the embodiments as illustrated in
In at least one embodiment, the processor 210, the heart rate sensor 220, the temperature sensor 230, and/or the other described electronics, such as the timer 340, or the alarm 450 embodied in the block diagrams of
In a further embodiment illustrated in
In at least one embodiment, the processor 210 is detached from the individual being monitored and is located in external equipment such as a medical monitor or a computer implemented device running code according to at least one method embodiment. In such an embodiment, examples of how the information is sent to such external equipment include, but is not limited to, transmitting can be sent wirelessly including optically, or by various types or arrangements of hardwire connections, or combinations thereof. An example of wireless and optical transmissions is through a transmitter and a receiver. In a further embodiment to any of the previous embodiments, the information can be received through, for example, a user interface, such as a keyboard, graphical user interface (e.g., touchscreen) on a display, or a microphone.
The information and operations that are transmitted throughout the various described embodiments can be in the form of electronic data, wireless signals, or a variation thereof, for example. In at least one embodiment, the processor 210 can be designed to accomplish signal processing in the configured system containing the sensors and electronics but can transmit signals to a network for further processing. In another embodiment, the processor 210 is connected to a communications circuit 560 to transmit individual or time series skin temperatures, individual or time series heart rates, and/or the TS score to an external system for monitoring and/or display, for example to the Individual Heat Optimization Training Tool (iHOTT) system that uses a color code system for monitored individuals to indicate if they are good (green), check on them (yellow), check on them now (red), and heat stroke alert (black) where the thermoregulatory strain index could be used to categorize the monitored individuals into these categories.
In a further embodiment, the system includes one or more means instead of a particular component.
A heart rate means for detecting a heart rate includes a sensor for measuring heart beats or blood flow, a heart rate sensor, a heart monitor, or another biotelemetry device configured to detect a heartbeat, a heart rate, or blood flow but is not limited in this regard and the means for measuring a heart rate or a heartbeat can be measured in real time or recorded for later use. The heart rate means includes the previous examples of the heart rate sensor.
In at least one embodiment, a temperature means for measuring the skin temperature can include various manual or digital thermometer and temperature gauges, but is not limited in this regard and additional apparatuses configured to detect heat or temperature can be used. The temperature means can detect skin temperature of an area of a body, such as an area of skin, can include a manual or digital thermometer, a temperature gauge, for example but is not limited in this regard and additional apparatuses configured to detect heat or temperature of an area of a body can be used. The temperature means includes the previous examples of the temperature sensor.
In at least one embodiment, a calculation means for calculating a TSI score for the individual based on the detected skin temperatures and the detected heart rates is the processor with suitable programming to perform the steps associated with this function.
As will be appreciated by one skilled in the art based on this disclosure, aspects of the present invention may be embodied as a system, method or computer program product. Accordingly, aspects of the present invention may take the form of an entirely hardware embodiment, a processor operating with software embodiment (including firmware, resident software, micro-code, etc.) or an embodiment combining software and hardware aspects that may all generally be referred to herein as a “circuit,” “module” or “system.” Furthermore, aspects of the present invention may take the form of a computer program product embodied in one or more computer readable medium(s) having computer readable program code embodied thereon.
Any combination of one or more computer readable medium(s) may be utilized. The computer readable medium may be a computer readable signal medium or a computer readable storage medium. A computer readable storage medium may be, for example, but not limited to, an electronic, magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, infrared, or semiconductor system, apparatus, or device, or any suitable combination of the foregoing. More specific examples (a non-exhaustive list) of the computer readable storage medium would include the following: an electrical connection having one or more wires, a portable (or USB) drive, a hard drive, a random-access memory (RAM), a read-only memory (ROM), an erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM or Flash memory), a magnetic storage device, or any suitable combination of the foregoing. In the context of this disclosure, a computer readable storage medium may be any tangible medium that can contain, or store a program for use by or in connection with an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device.
A computer readable signal medium may include a propagated data signal with computer readable program code embodied therein, for example, in baseband or as part of a carrier wave. Such a propagated signal may take any of a variety of forms, including, but not limited to, electro-magnetic, optical, or any suitable combination thereof. A computer readable signal medium may be any computer readable medium that is not a computer readable storage medium and that can communicate, propagate, or transport a program for use by or in connection with an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device.
Computer program code for carrying out operations for aspects of the present invention may be written in any combination of one or more programming languages. The program code may execute entirely on the processor 210 associated with the individual (individual's processor), partly on the individuals' processor, as a stand-alone software package, partly on the individual's processor and partly on a remote computer or entirely on the remote computer or server. In the latter scenario, the remote computer may be connected to the individual's processor through any type of network, including Bluetooth, a local area network (LAN) or a wide area network (WAN), or the connection may be made to an external computer.
Aspects of the present invention are described above with reference to flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams of methods, systems (or apparatuses) and computer program products according to embodiments of the invention. It will be understood that each block of the flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams, and combinations of blocks in the flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams, can be implemented by computer program instructions. These computer program instructions may be provided to the individual's processor, the processor of a general-purpose computer, a special purpose computer, or other programmable data processing apparatus to produce a machine, such that the instructions, which execute with the processor of the computer or other programmable data processing apparatus, create means for implementing the functions/acts specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.
These computer program instructions may also be stored in a computer readable medium that can direct the individual's processor, a computer, other programmable data processing apparatus, or other devices to function in a particular manner, such that the instructions stored in the computer readable medium produce an article of manufacture including instructions which implement the function/act specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.
The computer program instructions may also be loaded onto the individual's processor, a computer, other programmable data processing apparatus, or other devices to cause a series of operational steps to be performed on the computer, other programmable apparatus or other devices to produce a computer implemented process such that the instructions which execute on the computer or other programmable apparatus provide processes for implementing the functions/acts specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.
Referring now to
During the summer of 2021, a series of field research studies were done to test a prototype system and the feasibility to monitor about 500 recruits during a 56 hour final field training exercise (i.e., crucible). As part of the field study baseline physiological and perceptual data to characterized the thermoregulatory stresses of the crucible and capture data of exertional heat illnesses as they occurred. During the crucibles both heart rate and skin temperature were collected from each of the participants using a monitoring device. Skin temperature and heart rate complexities were computed using APEN for 361 recruits who participated in the first monitored crucible in 2021. The parameters used for APEN were 0.2 SD of individuals, comparing 2 points, and about 100 points in the time interval.
The TSI is represented by anti-rest or the inverse of the rest response where a lower heart rate complexity combined with an increased skin temperature complexity results in a higher thermoregulatory strain (equation 5):
Applying TSI to the 4 individuals that experienced an exertional heat illness shows a similar pattern from the data.
Currently, an estimated core temperature approach would provide an alert on two of these cases close to the time of collapse. The TSI has the potential to alert trainers and medics earlier that an individual is struggling and should be more closely watch/assessed.
The flowchart and block diagrams in the figures illustrate the architecture, functionality, and operation of possible implementations of systems, methods and computer program products according to various embodiments of the present invention. In this regard, each block in the flowchart or block diagrams may represent a module, circuit, segment, or portion of code, which includes one or more executable instructions for implementing the specified logical function(s). It should also be noted that, in some alternative implementations, the functions noted in the block may occur out of the order noted in the figures. For example, two blocks shown in succession may, in fact, be executed substantially concurrently, or the blocks may sometimes be executed in the reverse order, depending upon the functionality involved. It will also be noted that each block of the block diagrams and/or flowchart illustration, and combinations of blocks in the block diagrams and/or flowchart illustration, can be implemented by special purpose hardware-based systems that perform the specified functions or acts, or combinations of special purpose hardware and computer instructions.
The terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting of the invention. As used herein, the singular forms “a”, “an” and “the” are intended to include the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. It will be further understood that the root terms “include” and/or “have”, when used in this specification, specify the presence of stated features, integers, steps, operations, elements, and/or components, but do not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, integers, steps, operations, elements, components, and/or groups thereof. As used, “A, B and/or C” or “at least one of A, B, and C” means just A; just B; just C; A and B; A and C; B and C; or A, B and C.
The corresponding structures, materials, acts, and equivalents of all means plus function elements in the claims below are intended to include any structure, or material, for performing the function in combination with other claimed elements as specifically claimed. The description of the present invention has been presented for purposes of illustration and description, but is not intended to be exhaustive or limited to the invention in the form disclosed. Many modifications and variations will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention.
Although the present invention has been described in terms of particular example embodiments, it is not limited to those embodiments. The embodiments, examples, and modifications which would still be encompassed by the invention may be made by those skilled in the art, particularly in light of the foregoing teachings.
As used above “substantially,” “generally,” and other words of degree are relative modifiers intended to indicate permissible variation from the characteristic so modified. It is not intended to be limited to the absolute value or characteristic which it modifies but rather possessing more of the physical or functional characteristic than its opposite, and preferably, approaching or approximating such a physical or functional characteristic.
Those skilled in the art will appreciate that various adaptations and modifications of the embodiments described above can be configured without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention. Therefore, it is to be understood that, within the scope of the appended claims, the invention may be practiced other than as specifically described herein including dependent claims depending from more than 2 claims may depend from all other non-conflicting dependent claims depending from the same independent claim.
The disclosed embodiments provide an improved way to detect an EHI/HRI based upon an individual's TSI or a particular TSI score based on the skin temperature complexity and the heart rate complexity. In some embodiments, the systems and methods provide a mechanism to alert the individual of the potential for an EHI/HRI based on their TSI. The detection and prediction allow for an intervention to occur for the individual.
This application claims the benefit and priority to U.S. Pat. App. No. 63/217,600 filed on Jul. 1, 2021, which is hereby incorporated by reference.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2022/035990 | 7/1/2022 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
63217600 | Jul 2021 | US |