The present invention relates to thin film solar cells.
A) Increasing Emission Through a Potential Barrier by Altering the Surface Structure of the Potential Barrier.
In U.S. Pat. No. 6,680,214 and U.S. Pat. App. No. 2004/0206881 methods are disclosed for the induction of a suitable band gap and electron emissive properties into a substance, in which the substrate is provided with a surface structure corresponding to the interference of electron waves.
The space distribution of the probability wave associated with an elementary particle is given by:
ψ*=Aexp(ikr) (1)
where k is the wave number and r is a vector connecting initial and final locations of the particle.
Incident wave 101 Aexp(ikx) will mainly reflect back as reflected wave 103 βAexp(−ikx), and only a small part leaks through the surface to give transmitted wave 102 α(x)Aexp(ikx) (β≈1>>α). This is known as quantum mechanical tunneling. The elementary particle will pass the potential energy barrier with a low probability, depending on the potential energy barrier height.
In U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,531,703, 6,495,843 and 6,281,514, Tavkhelidze teaches a method for promoting the passage of elementary particles at or through a potential barrier comprising providing a potential barrier having a geometrical shape for causing de Broglie interference between said elementary particles.
Referring to
For certain values of a, the reflected probability wave equals zero meaning that the particle will not reflect back from surface 201. Leakage of the probability wave through the barrier will occur with increased probability.
Indents on the surface should have dimensions comparable to the de Broglie wavelength of an electron in order for this effect to be seen. Indents of these dimensions may be constructed on a surface by a number of means known in the art such as micro-machining. Alternatively, the indented shape may be introduced by depositing a series of islands on the surface.
For metals, this approach has a two-fold benefit. In the case that the potential barrier does not allow tunneling, providing indents on a surface of a metal creates for that metal an energy band gap due to de Broglie wave interference inside the metal. In the case that the potential barrier is of such a type that an electron can tunnel through it, providing indents on a metal surface decreases the effective potential barrier between metal and vacuum (the work function). In addition, an electron moving from vacuum into an anode electrode having an indented surface will also experience de Broglie interference, which will promote the movement of said electron into said electrode, thereby increasing the performance of the anode.
WO03083177 teaches that a metal surface can be modified with patterned indents to increase the Fermi energy level inside the metal, leading to decrease in electron work function. This effect would exist in any quantum system comprising fermions inside a potential energy box.
This approach can also be applied to semiconductors, in which case providing indents on the surface of a semiconductor modifies the size of the already present bandgap. This approach has many applications, including applications usually reserved for quantum dots.
In U.S. Pat. No. 6,117,344 methods for fabricating nano-structured surfaces having geometries in which the passage of elementary particles through a potential barrier is enhanced are described. The methods use combinations of electron beam lithography, lift-off, and rolling, imprinting or stamping processes.
WO9964642 discloses a method for fabricating nanostructures directly in a material film, preferably a metal film, deposited on a substrate. In a preferred embodiment a mold or stamp having a surface which is the topological opposite of the nanostructure to be created is pressed into a heated metal coated on a substrate. The film is cooled and the mold is removed. In another embodiment, the thin layer of metal remaining attached to the substrate is removed using bombardment with a charged particle beam.
B) Thin Film Solar Cells
Thin film solar cells made from Copper Indium Gallium Diselenide (CIGS) absorbers show great promise in achieving high conversion efficiencies, approaching 20%. The highest recorded efficiency of CIGS solar cells is by far the greatest compared with those achieved by other thin film technologies such as Cadmium Telluride (CdTe) or amorphous Silicon (a-Si).
CIGS solar cells contain several thin layers of an active material which is deposited onto an inexpensive carrier. While initially glass sheets were used as carriers, recent developments include metal foils, such as stainless steel and even polymer foils. On glass or polymers, the first layer deposited is a thin metal film serving as a back contact. Then, a semiconductor diode is formed by a combination of a CIGS (p-type) absorber with a top collector layer of CdS (n-type). Finally, a Zinc Oxide (ZnO) film and Aluminum (Al) grid are provided for the top layers and electrical contacts respectively.
Photons enter solar cell 300 via ZnO window layer 301. Absorber layer 305 absorbs photons and ejects electrons thus creating pairs of electrons 313 and holes 315. Collector layer 303 is an n-type semiconductor layer in electrical contact with absorber layer 305. This layer collects electrons 313 from absorber layer 305.
The separation of electron 313-hole 315 pair is maintained by the local electrical field formed at the p-n junction between absorber layer 305 and collector layer 303. Electron 313 moves towards aluminum contacts (not shown) on the surface of ZnO window 301 while hole 315 moves towards metal back contact 307; their movement is illustrated by the arrows shown. An electrical current is thus formed, which flows through electrical connectors 309. This current can be harnessed to power electrical load 311.
The typical thin film solar cell described has several disadvantages, the major one being its low efficiency. The cell's low efficiency is due to numerous factors, several of which are outlined below:
Only those photons with energies equal to or greater than the band gap of the absorber can be absorbed to produce electricity. The majority of photons, with energies outside of this range, is either reflected or passes straight through the solar cell. The efficiency of the solar cell is thus severely limited. Attempts at controlling the band gap of the absorber by the introduction of quantum dots are currently challenged by inefficient charge carrier transport mechanisms outside the quantum dots.
Potential power is also lost when electrons and holes combine between the p-n junction and back contact, thereby generating heat rather than electricity. This mechanism is the cause of collection losses and further reduces the efficiency of thin film solar cells.
Furthermore, a natural resistance exists between the inner, sandwiched cell layers and the outer electrical contact layers in contact with the external circuit. This resistance tends to impede current flow through the external circuit, thus further diminishing the power output of the device.
Due to the low power output, operating a solar cell is relatively expensive. A modest estimate of operating costs is in the region of $3/watt. This makes the solar cell a poor competitor in the energy generation market.
From the foregoing it may be appreciated that a need has arisen for a thin film solar cell with improved efficiency, capable of responding to a broader range of photon energies and with suppressed loss mechanisms and lower operating costs.
The present invention discloses a thin film solar cell containing a modified metal back contact. The cross sectional surface of a carrier layer is modified by nanoscale indentations or protrusions. A metal film is then deposited onto the carrier layer to form the back contact of the solar cell. The indentations or protrusions on the surface of the carrier layer are of dimensions so as to reduce the work function of the metal and thereby assist in the absorption of holes created by solar photons by the emission of electrons.
Further layers, including semiconductor absorber and collector layers and a window layer, are deposited above the metal contact to form a solar cell.
An advantage of the present invention is that since the modified structure of the metal reduces its work function, electrons are emitted from the metal surface at lower energies and can readily combine with holes, created by solar photons, to produce electricity. This improves the efficiency of the solar cell since a greater energy output is produced by a lower energy input.
A further advantage of the present invention is that the natural resistance present between the metal back contact and the semiconductor layer above it is reduced. Current losses at the back contact are therefore minimised, increasing the output current of the device.
Yet a further advantage of the present invention is the reduction in collection losses, which are caused by delayed recombination of electrons and holes between the p-n junction of the solar cell and the metal back contact. The reduced work function of the metal allows electrons and holes to combine more quickly and at lower energies, leading the generation of useful electricity rather than wasted heat.
A further advantage of the present invention is that it can be readily manufactured using inexpensive materials.
In a further embodiment of the present invention the semiconductor absorber layer, disposed on the surface of the metal back contact, is also modified with nanoscale indentations or protrusions. These have the effect of changing the size of the band gap in the semiconductor and thus altering the absorption properties of the solar cell.
An advantage of this embodiment of the present invention is that, due to the modification of the semiconductor absorber layer, the size of the band gap in the semiconductor is tuned. An optimum band gap, facilitating maximum possible solar-electric energy conversion, can thus be selected and the sensitivity of the solar cell extended to include lower energy photons.
A further advantage of the present invention is that the band gap of the semiconductor absorber layer can be tuned so as to optimize absorption of light based on specific local geographical requirements.
A further advantage of the present invention is that the structure of the carrier layer—when replicated on the front surface—reduces the reflection of photons and thereby increases the amount of energy absorbed.
An overall advantage of the present invention, due to the contributing advantages outlined so far, is that its operating cost is lower due to its improved efficiency.
Still further advantages will become apparent from a consideration of the ensuing description and drawings.
Embodiments of the present invention will now be described with reference to appropriate figures, which are given by way of example only and are not intended to limit the present invention.
For a more complete explanation of the present invention and the technical advantages thereof, reference is now made to the following description and the accompanying drawings in which:
The embodiments of the present invention and its technical advantages are best understood by referring to
Referring now to
The surface of carrier layer 401 is modified with nanoscale indentations or protrusions to have a periodically repeating structure of one or more indents or protrusions. Methods for carrying this out are well known to those skilled in the art and include screen printing, as used for printing CD surfaces, electron beam lithography and other imprinting processes. In a preferred embodiment of the present invention the indents or protrusions are of a depth less than approximately 10 nm and a width less than approximately 1 μm. In further possible embodiments of the present invention the indents or protrusions are of a depth approximately equal to 5 nm and a width less than approximately 100 nm.
A thin film of metal is deposited on carrier layer 401 forming metal back contact 403. This deposition can be carried out using a variety of methods, well known to those skilled in the art, including sputtering and physical vapor deposition. All other overlying films—405, 407 and 409—are deposited by methods known in the art including a combination of “ink-jet” printing the individual components followed by thermal annealing.
Incoming solar photons enter solar cell 400 via Zinc Oxide (ZnO) window layer 409. These photons undergo reflection, transmission or absorption depending on their individual energies relative to the size of the band gap in absorber layer 405. Photons with energies smaller than the band gap cannot be absorbed by the solar cell and are either reflected from the surface or pass straight through the device. Photons with energies equal to or greater than the band gap are absorbed and excite electrons from the valence to conduction band in absorber layer 405, thus creating electron-hole pairs.
Due to the intrinsic voltage differential across the absorber-collector p-n junction, the electrons and holes separate and move towards collector layer 407 or within absorber layer 405 respectively. Electrons in collector layer 407 arrive at an aluminum grid electrical contact (not shown) on the surface of window layer 409. Holes in absorber layer 405 arrive at metal back contact 403. The nanostructure underlying metal back contact 403 serves to reduce its work function and therefore assists in the absorption of holes. Electrons from the metal back contact readily combine with the holes to produce a current at metal back contact 403.
In a particularly preferred embodiment of the present invention, absorber layer 405 is made of Copper Indium Gallium Diselenide (CIGS), a p-type semiconductor, and is substantially 2-3 μm thick.
In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, collector layer 407 is made of Cadmium Sulphide (CdS), an n-type semiconductor and is substantially equal to 0.1 μm thick.
In yet another preferred embodiment of the present invention printed carrier layer 401 is a polyimide film with thickness substantially greater than 100 μm.
In a preferred embodiment of the present invention metal back contact 403 is Molybdenum and is substantially 0.5 μm thick. In further possible embodiments of the invention, metal back contact 403 is made of a choice of metals including Copper, Nickel and Aluminium.
In a further possible embodiment of the present invention the surface structure of carrier layer 401 is replicated on the front side of solar cell 400, namely the side of solar cell 400 that faces the sun. The surface structure acts as an anti-reflective coating due to interference effects, thereby optimizing the absorption of incoming solar photons.
Referring now to
Shown is solar cell 500 comprising carrier layer, 401, metal back contact, 403, p-type semiconductor absorber layer, 501, n-type semiconductor collector layer 407 and ZnO window layer 409.
Whereas in the previous embodiment of the present invention shown in
In a particularly preferred embodiment of the present invention, the size of the indentations or protrusions on the surface of semiconductor absorber layer 501 is chosen so as to produce the optimum band gap in the semiconductor, leading to maximum possible solar-electric energy conversion.
In a further preferred embodiment of the present invention, the band gap of semiconductor absorber layer 501 is tuned so as to extend the absorption band edge to longer wavelengths, allowing the absorption of photons in the infrared region.
In another embodiment of the present invention, the band gap is tuned based on the specific local requirements of the region where the solar cell operates so that maximum sunlight energy is absorbed.
All other structural and functional details of the embodiment of the present invention shown in
Although the description above contains many specificities, these should not be construed as limiting the scope of the present invention but as merely providing illustrations of some of the presently preferred embodiments of the invention. Thus the scope of the present invention should be determined by the appended claims and their legal equivalents, rather than by the examples given.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/900,602, filed Feb. 9, 2007.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2510397 | Hansell | Jun 1950 | A |
2915652 | Hatsopoulos | Dec 1959 | A |
3021472 | Hernqvist | Feb 1962 | A |
3118107 | Gabor | Jan 1964 | A |
3169200 | Huffman | Feb 1965 | A |
3173032 | Maynard | Mar 1965 | A |
3194989 | Garbuny | Jul 1965 | A |
3238395 | Sense | Mar 1966 | A |
3239745 | Hernqvist | Mar 1966 | A |
3267307 | Fox | Aug 1966 | A |
3267308 | Hernqvist | Aug 1966 | A |
3281372 | Haas | Oct 1966 | A |
3300660 | Bensimon | Jan 1967 | A |
3328611 | Davis | Jun 1967 | A |
3376437 | Meyerand, Jr. | Apr 1968 | A |
3393330 | Vary | Jul 1968 | A |
3470393 | Moncorge | Sep 1969 | A |
3515908 | Caldwell | Jun 1970 | A |
3519854 | Davis | Jul 1970 | A |
3578992 | Shimada | May 1971 | A |
3600933 | Johnston | Aug 1971 | A |
3740592 | Engdahl et al. | Jun 1973 | A |
3821462 | Kaufman et al. | Jun 1974 | A |
3843896 | Rason et al. | Oct 1974 | A |
4004210 | Yater | Jan 1977 | A |
4011582 | Cline et al. | Mar 1977 | A |
4039352 | Marinescu | Aug 1977 | A |
4063965 | Cline et al. | Dec 1977 | A |
4188571 | Brunson | Feb 1980 | A |
4224461 | Snyder, Jr. et al. | Sep 1980 | A |
4281280 | Richards | Jul 1981 | A |
4373142 | Morris | Feb 1983 | A |
4410951 | Nakamura et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
4423347 | Kleinschmidt et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
4667126 | Fitzpatrick | May 1987 | A |
4686162 | Stangl et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4880975 | Nishioka et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4928030 | Culp | May 1990 | A |
4937489 | Hattori | Jun 1990 | A |
4958201 | Mimura | Sep 1990 | A |
5023671 | DiVincenzo et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5028835 | Fitzpatrick | Jul 1991 | A |
5049775 | Smits | Sep 1991 | A |
5068535 | Rabalais | Nov 1991 | A |
5083056 | Kondou et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5119151 | Onda | Jun 1992 | A |
5229320 | Ugajin | Jul 1993 | A |
5233205 | Usagawa et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5247223 | Mori et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5307311 | Sliwa, Jr. | Apr 1994 | A |
5309056 | Culp | May 1994 | A |
5327038 | Culp | Jul 1994 | A |
5332952 | Ugajin et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5336547 | Kawakita et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5351412 | Furuhata | Oct 1994 | A |
5356484 | Yater | Oct 1994 | A |
5371388 | Oda | Dec 1994 | A |
5399930 | Culp | Mar 1995 | A |
5410166 | Kennel | Apr 1995 | A |
5430409 | Buck et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5432362 | Lippens et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5465021 | Visscher et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5487790 | Yasuda | Jan 1996 | A |
5498904 | Harata et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5503963 | Bifano | Apr 1996 | A |
5504388 | Kimura et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5521735 | Shimizu et al. | May 1996 | A |
5579232 | Tong et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5592042 | Takuchi | Jan 1997 | A |
5604357 | Hori | Feb 1997 | A |
5654557 | Taneya et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5675972 | Edelson | Oct 1997 | A |
5699668 | Cox | Dec 1997 | A |
5701043 | Razzaghi | Dec 1997 | A |
5705321 | Brueck et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5719407 | Ugajin | Feb 1998 | A |
5722242 | Edelson | Mar 1998 | A |
5772905 | Chou | Jun 1998 | A |
5810980 | Edelson | Sep 1998 | A |
5874039 | Edelson | Feb 1999 | A |
5917156 | Nobori et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5939872 | Dubos et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5973259 | Edelson | Oct 1999 | A |
5981071 | Cox | Nov 1999 | A |
5981866 | Edelson | Nov 1999 | A |
5994638 | Edelson | Nov 1999 | A |
6064137 | Cox | May 2000 | A |
6084173 | DiMatteo | Jul 2000 | A |
6089311 | Edelson | Jul 2000 | A |
6117344 | Cox et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6214651 | Cox | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6225205 | Kinoshita | May 2001 | B1 |
6232546 | DiMatteo et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6281514 | Tavkhelidze | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6309580 | Chou | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6310281 | Wendt et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6417060 | Tavkhelidze et al. | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6489704 | Kucherov et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6495843 | Tavkelidze | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6531703 | Tavkhelidze et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6680214 | Tavkhelidze et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6720704 | Tavkhelidze et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6774003 | Tavkhelidze et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6869855 | Tavkhelidze et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6876123 | Marinovsky et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6908861 | Sreenivasan et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6914312 | Nishikawa et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6919605 | Tigelaar | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6919608 | Gregg | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6975060 | Styblo et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7074498 | Tavkhelidze et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7122398 | Pichler | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7166786 | Tavkhelidze et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7169006 | Tavkhelidze et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7211891 | Shimogishi et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7253549 | Tavkhelidze et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
20010046749 | Tavkhelidze et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020170172 | Tavkhelidze et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030042819 | Martinovsky et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030068431 | Taliashvili et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030127127 | Inamasu et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030152815 | LaFollette et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030221608 | Mori | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040029341 | Cox et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040174596 | Umeki | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040195934 | Tanielian | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040206881 | Tavkhelidze et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050074915 | Tuttle et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050104512 | Tavkhelidze et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050109392 | Hollars | May 2005 | A1 |
20050110099 | Shimogishi et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050145836 | Tavkhelidze et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20070056623 | Tavkhelidze et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3404137 | Aug 1985 | DE |
3818192 | Dec 1989 | DE |
4025618 | Feb 1992 | DE |
0437654 | Jul 1991 | EP |
07322659 | Dec 1995 | JP |
WO-9702460 | Jan 1997 | WO |
WO-9910974 | Mar 1999 | WO |
WO-9913562 | Mar 1999 | WO |
WO-9964642 | Dec 1999 | WO |
WO-0059047 | Oct 2000 | WO |
WO-0247178 | Jun 2002 | WO |
WO-03021758 | Mar 2003 | WO |
WO-03083177 | Oct 2003 | WO |
WO-03090245 | Oct 2003 | WO |
WO-2004040617 | May 2004 | WO |
WO-2006055890 | May 2006 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Chakrabarti et al., “Photoconductivity of Cu(In,Ga)Se2 films”, Solar Energy Materials, 1996. |
Krc et al., Optical and electrical modeling of Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells, Optical and Quantum Electronics, 2006. |
Bardeen et al., “Theory of Superconductivity”, Physical Review, Dec. 1, 1957, pp. 1175-1204, vol. 108, No. 5. |
Chou et al., “Imprint Lithography with 25 Nanometer Resolution”, Science, Apr. 5, 1996, pp. 85-87, vol. 272. |
Hishinuma et al., “Refrigeration by combined tunneling and thermionic emmission in vacuum: Use of nanometer scale design”, Appl Phys Lett, Apr. 23, 2001, pp. 2572-2574,vol. 78,No. 17. |
Leon N. Cooper, “Bound Electron Pairs in Degenerate Fermi Gas”, Physical Review, Nov. 15, 1956, pp. 1189-1190, vol. 104, No. 4. |
Sungtaek Ju et al., “Study of interface effects in thermoelectric microfefrigerators”, Journal of Applied Physics, Oct. 1, 2000, pp. 4135-4139, vol. 88, No. 7. |
Tavkhelidze et. al, “Observation of New Quantum Interference Effect in Solids”, Vacuum Nanoelectronics Conference, 2005. IVNC 2005. Technical Digest of the 18th International, Jul. 10-14, 2005, pp. 11-12. |
Tavkhelidze et. al, “Observation of quantum interference effect in solids”, Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B: Microelectronics and Nanometer Structures, May 12, 2006, pp. 1413-1416, vol. 24, Issue 3. |
Fitzpatrick, Gary et al., “Demonstration of Close-Spaced Thermionic Converters”, Proceedings of the 28th Intersociety Energy Conversion Engineering Conference, May 1993, pp. 1.573-1.580, vol. 1, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, USA. |
Fitzpatrick, Gary O. et al., “Close-Spaced Thermionic Converters with Active Spacing Control and Heat-Pipe Isothermal Emitters”, Proceedings of the 31st Intersociety Energy Conversion Engineering Conference, Aug. 11, 1996, pp. 920-927, vol. 2, IEEE, USA. |
Fitzpatrick, Gary O. et al., “Updated perspective on the potential for thermionic conversion to meet 21st century energy needs”, IECEC '97, Proceedings of the 32nd Intersociety Energy Conversion Engineering Conference, Energy Systems, Renewable Energy Resources, Environmental Impact and Policy Impacts on Energy, Jul. 27, 1997, pp. 1045-1051, vol. 2, IEEE, USA. |
Fukuda, Ryuzo et al., “Development of the Oxygenated Thermionic Energy Converters Utilizing the Sputtered Metal Oxides as a Collector”, Space Technology and Applications International Forum—1999, AIP Conference Proceedings, Subseries: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Jan. 22, 1999, pp. 1444-1451, vol. 458, American Institute of Physics, USA. |
Abstract of JP 05226704 A, Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd, Sep. 3, 1993, “Thermoelectric Device and its Manufacture”. |
Hatsopoulos, George N. et al., “Thermionic Energy Conversion—vol. I: Process and Devices”, Mar. 15, 1974, p. 222, The MIT Press, USA. |
Houston. J.M., “Theoretical Efficiency of the Thermionic Energy Converter”, Journal of Apllied Physics, Sep. 17, 1959, pp. 481-487, vol. 30, No. 4, American Institute of Physics, New York. |
Huffman, Fred N. et al., “Preliminary Investigation of a Thermotunnel Converter”, 1988 IECEC; Proceedings of the Twenty-third Intersociety Energy Conversion Engineering Conference, Aug. 1988, pp. 573-579, vol. 1, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York. |
Kalandarishvili, Arnold G., “The basics of the technology of creating a small interelectrode spacing in thermionic energy converters with the use of two-phase systems”, IECEC '97, Proceedings of the 32nd Intersociety Energy Conversion Engineering Conference, Energy Systems, Renewable Energy Resources, Environmental Impact and Policy Impacts on Energy, Jul. 27, 1997, pp. 1052-1056, vol. 2, IEEE, USA. |
King, Donald B. et al., “Results from the Microminiature Thermionic Converter Demonstration Testing Program”, Space Technology and Applications International Forum—1999, Jan. 22, 1999, pp. 1432-1436, vol. 458, American Institute of Physics, USA. |
Mahan, G.D., “Thermionic Refrigeration”, Journal of Applied Physics, Oct. 1, 1994, pp. 4362-4366, vol. 76, Issue 7, American Institue of Physics, USA. |
Shakouri, Ali et al., “Enhanced Thermionic Emission Cooling in High Barrier Superlattice Hetero-structures”, Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings, Mar. 1999, pp. 449-458, vol. 545, Materials Research Society, Warrendale, Pennsylvania. |
Svensson, Robert et al., “TEC as Electric Generator in an Automobile Catalytic Converter”, Proceedings of the 31st Intersociety Energy Conversion Engineering Conference, Aug. 1996, pp. 941-944, vol. 2, IEEE, USA. |
Zeng, Taofang et al., “Hot Electron Effects on Thermionic Emission Cooling in Heterostructures”, Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings, Mar. 1999, pp. 467-472, vol. 545, Materials Research Society, Warrendale, Pennsylvania. |
Abstract of SU 861916 B, Burmistrov, Sep. 10, 1981, “Electro-hydrodynamic heat pipe—has needle electrodes situated on wall in condensation zone”. |
Abstract of JP 404080964 A, ANDO, Mar. 13, 1992, “Semiconductor device”. |
Abstract of JP 03155376 A, Japan Tom Power Co Ltd, Jul. 3, 1991, “Thermoelectric Generating Element”. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60900602 | Feb 2007 | US |