The present invention generally relates to one-dimensional array cameras and also relates to the construction of modular array cameras using one-dimensional sub-array modules.
In response to the constraints placed upon a traditional digital camera based upon the camera obscura, a new class of cameras that can be referred to as array cameras has been proposed. Array cameras are characterized in that they include an imager array that has multiple arrays of pixels, where each pixel array is intended to define a focal plane, and each focal plane has a separate lens stack. Typically, each focal plane includes a plurality of rows of pixels that also forms a plurality of columns of pixels, and each focal plane is contained within a region of the imager that does not contain pixels from another focal plane. An image is typically formed on each focal plane by its respective lens stack. In many instances, the array camera is constructed using an imager array that incorporates multiple focal planes and an optic array of lens stacks.
Systems and methods in accordance with embodiments of the invention implement one-dimensional array cameras, as well as modular array cameras using sub-array modules. In one embodiment, a 1×N array camera module includes: a 1×N arrangement of focal planes, where N is greater than or equal to 2, each focal plane includes a plurality of rows of pixels that also form a plurality of columns of pixels, and each focal plane does not include pixels from another focal plane; and a 1×N arrangement of lens stacks, the 1×N arrangement of lens stacks being disposed relative to the 1×N arrangement of focal planes so as to form a 1×N arrangement of cameras, each of which being configured to independently capture an image of a scene, where each lens stack has a field of view that is shifted with respect to the field-of-views of each other lens stack so that each shift includes a sub-pixel shifted view of the scene.
In another embodiment, N is greater than or equal to 3.
In yet another embodiment, N is 5.
In still another embodiment, the 1×N arrangement of cameras includes a green camera that is configured to image light corresponding with the green band of the visible spectrum.
In still yet another embodiment, the green camera is centrally disposed relative to the 1×N arrangement of cameras.
In a further embodiment, the lens stack of the green camera is adapted to image light corresponding with the green band of the visible spectrum.
In a still further embodiment, a red camera that is configured to image light corresponding with the red band of the visible spectrum and a blue camera that is configured to image light corresponding with the blue band of the visible spectrum are each disposed on either side of the centrally disposed green camera.
In a yet further embodiment, N is 7.
In a still yet further embodiment, the 1×N arrangement of cameras includes a green camera that is configured to image light corresponding with the green band of the visible spectrum, and that is centrally disposed relative to the 1×N arrangement of cameras.
In another embodiment, a red camera that is configured to image light corresponding with the red band of the visible spectrum and a blue camera that is configured to image light corresponding with the blue band of the visible spectrum are each disposed on either side of the centrally disposed green camera.
In yet another embodiment, N is 9.
In still another embodiment, the 1×N arrangement of cameras includes a green camera that is configured to image light corresponding with the green band of the visible spectrum, and that is centrally disposed relative to the 1×N arrangement of cameras.
In still yet another embodiment, a red camera that is configured to image light corresponding with the red band of the visible spectrum and a blue camera that is configured to image light corresponding with the blue band of the visible spectrum are each disposed on either side of the centrally disposed green camera.
In a further embodiment, the 1×N arrangement of focal planes is embodied within a monolithic structure.
In a still further embodiment, the 1×N arrangement of lens stacks is embodied within a monolithic structure.
In a yet further embodiment, the 1×N arrangement of focal planes and the 1×N arrangement of lens stacks are each embodied within the same monolithic structure.
In a still yet further embodiment, at least one camera is embodied within a single sub-array module, the sub-array module including: a 1×X arrangement of focal planes, where X is greater than or equal to 1, each focal plane comprises a plurality of rows of pixels that also form a plurality of columns of pixels, and each focal plane does not include pixels from another focal plane; and a 1×X arrangement of lens stacks, the 1×X arrangement of lens stacks being disposed relative to the 1×X arrangement of focal planes so as to form a 1×X arrangement of cameras, each of which being configured to independently capture an image of a scene, where each lens stack has a field of view that is shifted with respect to the field-of-views of each other lens stack so that each shift includes a sub-pixel shifted view of the scene.
In another embodiment, the sub-array module further includes interface circuitry that can allow the sub-array module to interface with another sub-array module so that it can at least transmit image data to another sub-array module or receive image data from another sub-array module.
In yet another embodiment, the 1×X arrangement of cameras is embodied within a single monolithic structure.
In still another embodiment N is 9 and X is 3.
In still yet another embodiment, the 1×9 arrangement of cameras are embodied within three 1×3 sub-array modules, each 1×3 sub-array module including: a 1×3 arrangement of focal planes, where each focal plane comprises a plurality of rows of pixels that also form a plurality of columns of pixels, and each focal plane does not include pixels from another focal plane; and a 1×3 arrangement of lens stacks, the 1×3 arrangement of lens stacks being disposed relative to the 1×3 arrangement of focal planes so as to form a 1×3 arrangement of cameras, each of which being configured to independently capture an image of a scene, where each lens stack has a field of view that is shifted with respect to the field-of-views of each other lens stack so that each shift includes a sub-pixel shifted view of the scene.
In a further embodiment, each sub-array module further includes interface circuitry that can allow the sub-array module to interface with another sub-array module so that it can at least transmit image data to another sub-array module or receive image data from another sub-array module.
In a still further embodiment, an array camera module further includes at least two sub-array modules, where each sub-array module includes: a 1×X arrangement of focal planes, where X is greater than or equal to 1, each focal plane comprises a plurality of rows of pixels that also form a plurality of columns of pixels, and each focal plane does not include pixels from another focal plane; and a 1×X arrangement of lens stacks, the 1×X arrangement of lens stacks being disposed relative to the 1×X arrangement of focal planes so as to form a 1×X arrangement of cameras, each of which being configured to independently capture an image of a scene, where each lens stack has a field of view that is shifted with respect to the field-of-views of each other lens stack so that each shift includes a sub-pixel shifted view of the scene; where each of the at least two sub-array modules are adjoined to the interconnects of a single substrate, and can thereby interface with at least one other sub-array module.
In a yet further embodiment, each of the at least two sub-array modules further includes interface circuitry that can allow the respective sub-array module to interface with another sub-array module so that it can at least transmit image data to another sub-array module or receive image data from another sub-array module.
In a still yet further embodiment, the substrate is optically transparent.
In another embodiment, the substrate is glass.
In yet another embodiment, the substrate is ceramic.
In a further embodiment, a 1×X sub-array module includes: a 1×X arrangement of focal planes, where X is greater than or equal to 1, each focal plane comprises a plurality of rows of pixels that also form a plurality of columns of pixels, and each focal plane does not include pixels from another focal plane; and a 1×X arrangement of lens stacks, the 1×X arrangement of lens stacks being disposed relative to the 1×X arrangement of focal planes so as to form a 1×X arrangement of cameras, each of which being configured to independently capture an image of a scene, where each lens stack has a field of view that is shifted with respect to the field-of-views of each other lens stack so that each shift includes a sub-pixel shifted view of the scene.
In a yet further embodiment, the 1×X sub-array module further includes interface circuitry that can allow the sub-array module to interface with another sub-array module so that it can at least transmit image data to another sub-array module or receive image data from another sub-array module.
In a still further embodiment, the interface circuitry implements a MIPI CSI 2 interface.
In another embodiment, a 1×N array camera includes: a 1×N arrangement of focal planes, where N is greater than or equal to 2, each focal plane comprises a plurality of rows of pixels that also form a plurality of columns of pixels, and each focal plane does not include pixels from another focal plane; and a 1×N arrangement of lens stacks, the 1×N arrangement of lens stacks being disposed relative to the 1×N arrangement of focal planes so as to form a 1×N arrangement of cameras, each of which being configured to independently capture an image of a scene, where each lens stack has a field of view that is shifted with respect to the field-of-views of each other lens stack so that each shift includes a sub-pixel shifted view of the scene; and a processor that is configured to construct an image of the scene using image data generated by the 1×N array camera module.
In a further embodiment, an X×Y sub-array module includes: an X×Y arrangement of focal planes, where X and Y are each greater than or equal to 1, each focal plane includes a plurality of rows of pixels that also form a plurality of columns of pixels, and each focal plane does not include pixels from another focal plane; and an X×Y arrangement of lens stacks, the X×Y arrangement of lens stacks being disposed relative to the X×Y arrangement of focal planes so as to form an X×Y arrangement of cameras, each of which being configured to independently capture an image of a scene, where each lens stack has a field of view that is shifted with respect to the field-of-views of each other lens stack so that each shift includes a sub-pixel shifted view of the scene; and image data output circuitry that is configured to output image data from the X×Y sub-array module that can be aggregated with image data from other sub-array modules so that an image of the scene can be constructed.
In a yet further embodiment, X is 1.
In a still further embodiment, X and Y are each greater than 1.
In a still yet further embodiment, the arrangement of cameras are embodied within a single monolithic structure
In another embodiment, an M×N array camera includes: a plurality of X×Y sub-array modules, each including: an X×Y arrangement of focal planes, where X and Y are each greater than or equal to 1, each focal plane includes a plurality of rows of pixels that also form a plurality of columns of pixels, and each focal plane does not include pixels from another focal plane; and an X×Y arrangement of lens stacks, the X×Y arrangement of lens stacks being disposed relative to the X×Y arrangement of focal planes so as to form an X×Y arrangement of cameras, each of which being configured to independently capture an image of a scene, where each lens stack has a field of view that is shifted with respect to the field-of-views of each other lens stack so that each shift includes a sub-pixel shifted view of the scene; and image data output circuitry that is configured to output image data from the sub-array module that can be aggregated with image data from other sub-array modules so that an image of the scene can be constructed; where the plurality of X×Y sub-array modules define at least some of the cameras in an M×N arrangement of cameras; and a processor; where the processor is configured to construct an image of the scene using image data generated by each of the sub-array modules.
In yet another embodiment, X is 1 and M is 1.
In still another embodiment, the plurality of X×Y sub-array modules define an M×N arrangement of cameras.
In still yet another embodiment, an M×N array camera further includes circuitry that aggregates the image data generated by each of the sub-array modules into a single MIPI output, and provides the MIPI output to the processor so that the processor can construct an image of the scene.
In a further embodiment, an M×N array camera further includes a parallax disparity resolution module, where the parallax disparity resolution module is configured to receive image data captured by each sub-array module, implement a parallax detection and correction process on the received image data, and output the result for further processing.
In a still further embodiment, an M×N array camera further includes circuitry that converts the output of the parallax disparity resolution module into a single MIPI output, and provides the MIPI output to the processor so that the processor can construct an image of the scene.
In a still yet further embodiment, the parallax disparity resolution module includes a processor and memory, where the memory contains software to configure the processor to act as a parallax disparity resolution module.
In another embodiment, the parallax disparity resolution module is a hardware parallax disparity resolution module.
In still another embodiment, M and N are each greater than or equal to 2.
In yet another embodiment, at least two of the plurality of sub-array modules are adjoined to the interconnects of a single substrate, and can thereby output image data through the interconnects.
In still yet another embodiment, each of the plurality of sub-array modules are adjoined to the interconnects of a single substrate, and can thereby output image data through the interconnects.
In a further embodiment, the substrate is optically transparent.
In a still further embodiment, the substrate is glass.
In a still yet further embodiment, the substrate is ceramic.
In another embodiment, at least one sub-array module is embodied within a single monolithic structure.
In yet another embodiment, each sub-array module is embodied within a single respective monolithic structure.
In still another embodiment, an array camera further includes: a plurality of I/O devices, where each of the plurality of I/O devices interfaces with at least one camera: and a separate I/O block that includes circuitry configured to receive image data, aggregate the received image data, and output the aggregated image data to the processor so that the processor can construct an image of the scene; and where each of the plurality of I/O devices interfaces with the I/O block.
In still yet another embodiment, the number of I/O devices equals the number of sub-array modules, and each I/O device interfaces with a corresponding sub-array module.
Turning now to the drawings, systems and methods for implementing one-dimensional array cameras and modular array cameras are disclosed. Processes for constructing array cameras using lens stack arrays are described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/935,504, entitled “Capturing and Processing of Images Using Monolithic Camera Array with Heterogeneous Imagers”, Venkataraman et al., which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. The monolithic array camera modules illustrated in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/935,504 can be constructed from an optic array of lens stacks—each lens stack in the array defining an optical channel—and an imager array including a plurality of focal planes corresponding to the optical channels in the optic array. The combination of a lens stack and its corresponding focal plane can be understood to be a ‘camera’ (as opposed to an ‘array camera’). Typically, array cameras capture image data that can be used to form multiple images of a single scene using their constituent cameras, and process the image data to yield a single image of the scene with improved image properties.
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/935,504 discloses many two-dimensional array camera schemes. However, such two-dimensional embodiments may be inapplicable in a number of desirable applications. For example, a consumer electronics device, such as a tablet or smartphone, may benefit from the use of an array camera with a distinctly thin form factor such that it would be able to fit within the device's bezel.
Many embodiments of the invention utilize one-dimensional array camera modules. One-dimensional array camera modules are advantageous insofar as they may accommodate distinct form factor requirements, and are further advantageous in that they may ease processing requirements as compared with two-dimensional array cameras (e.g. they simplify parallax disparity resolution calculations). In many embodiments, 1×5 array camera modules are utilized in the construction of an array camera. In several embodiments, a 1×5 array camera module is utilized that includes a central narrow spectral band green camera (i.e. a camera configured to image light that falls within the ‘green’ band of the visible spectrum, which can be achieved, for example, where the corresponding lens stack is configured to focus light that falls within the ‘green’ band of the visible spectrum onto the corresponding focal plane), and adjacent narrow spectral band blue and red cameras on either side of the central narrow spectral band green camera. In a number of embodiments, 1×7 array camera modules are utilized in the construction of array cameras. In several embodiments, a 1×7 array camera module includes a central narrow spectral band green camera, adjacent narrow spectral band blue and red cameras on either side of the central narrow spectral band green camera, and two periphery narrow spectral band green cameras.
In many embodiments, 1×9 array camera modules are utilized in the construction of an array camera. A 1×9 array camera module can be preferable to either a 1×7 or a 1×5 array camera module since a 1×9 array camera module can capture more image data. 1×9 array camera modules may include narrow spectral band green, blue, and red cameras, full visual spectrum cameras, and/or near-infrared (near-IR) cameras, which are useful for imaging in low lighting conditions. In many embodiments, a 1×9 array camera module includes more narrow spectral band green cameras than either narrow spectral band blue, narrow spectral band red, or near-IR cameras.
In many embodiments, one-dimensional array camera modules are constructed that do not use narrow spectral band cameras; in many embodiments one-dimensional array camera modules are constructed that employ Bayer filters to facilitate the imaging of a scene.
Although one-dimensional array cameras may be beneficial in numerous applications, their manufacture can be challenging. Specifically, components for one-dimensional array cameras (e.g. the lenses and the corresponding sensor) are typically manufactured on wafers, but the elongated nature of the components may not be conducive to optimizing wafer space. For example, in the manufacture of a one-dimensional lens array, the periphery of the wafer used in the manufacture may contain significant unused space that, because of the elongated shape of lens array, cannot accommodate further lens arrays. In other words, wafers may be more efficient in the manufacture of components that are more ‘square’ in shape than ‘elongated.’
In many embodiments of the invention, array cameras are constructed using sub-array modules. Each of the sub-array modules are configured to interface with other sub-array modules so that data can pass between the sub-array modules, enabling a processor to communicate with multiple sub-array modules via an interface with one of the sub-array modules. The dies used in the construction of sub-array modules may be less elongated as compared with the dies utilized in the construction of the aforementioned one-dimensional array camera modules, and can therefore better utilize wafer space. In several embodiments, a 1×3 sub-array module is utilized that includes input and output interface circuitry, which allow the sub-array module to couple with other sub-array modules. In many embodiments, a sub-array module including a single camera is utilized. The interface circuitry can further allow coupled sub-array modules to transmit and receive data including image data and/or instructions from a processor with one another. The image data from one of the sub-array modules may be read out by a processor. The interface circuitry may employ any interface protocol including Mobile Industry Processor Interface Alliance (MIPI) Camera Serial Interface 2(c) interface format (the “MIPI interface format”) or a Standard Mobile Imaging Architecture (“SMIA”) format. The 1×3 modular array cameras may include constituent narrow spectral band green, blue, or red cameras and may also include near-IR cameras.
Using sub-array modules to construct array cameras can provide numerous advantages. First, the manufacture of sub-array modules can result in a greater yield as compared with the manufacturing yield of longer one-dimensional array camera modules since sub-array module components may more efficiently utilize wafer space. Additionally, their manufacture can also result in comparatively greater homogeneity between sub-array modules since sub-array modules are less intricate as compared with longer one-dimensional array camera modules or two-dimensional array camera modules. Moreover, sub-array modules are versatile insofar as they can be used to construct array cameras of any specified dimension.
One-dimensional array camera modules and sub-array modules in accordance with embodiments of the invention are discussed further below.
Array Camera Architecture
Array cameras in accordance with many embodiments of the invention can include an array camera module and a processor. The array camera module can include an array of cameras. An array camera module can include an imager array, which is a sensor that includes an array of focal planes. Each focal plane includes an array of pixels used to capture an image formed on the focal plane by a lens stack. The focal plane can be formed of, but is not limited to, traditional CIS (CMOS Image Sensor), CCD (charge-coupled device), quantum film image sensors, high dynamic range sensor elements, multispectral sensor elements and various alternatives thereof. In many embodiments, the pixels of each focal plane have similar physical properties and receive light through the same lens stack. Furthermore, the pixels in each focal plane may be associated with the same color filter. In a number of embodiments, at least one of the focal planes includes a Bayer-pattern filter. In several embodiments, the focal planes are independently controlled. In other embodiments, the operation of the focal planes in the imager array is controlled via a single set of controls. Array cameras are discussed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/106,797 entitled “Architectures for imager arrays and array cameras” and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/952,106 entitled “Capturing and processing of images using monolithic camera array with heterogenous imagers” the disclosure of both applications is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
An array camera architecture that can be used in a variety of array camera configurations in accordance with embodiments of the invention is illustrated in
In many embodiments, the array camera 100 captures images using a plurality of cameras 104, which can have different imaging characteristics. The array camera 100 can separately control each of the cameras to obtain enhanced image capture and/or to enhance processes such as (but not limited to) super-resolution processes that may be applied to the captured images. For example, each pixel of a focal plane may capture different wavelengths of light, or may capture the intensity of light, varying exposure times, start times, or end times. Once the array camera 100 has commenced capturing image data using the pixels on the imager array, the focal planes can commence transmitting the image data captured using the pixels to a receiving device 108. The image data captured by different cameras can be interleaved for transmission to a receiving device 108 that includes interface circuitry configured to receive image data. In many embodiments, the interface circuitry is implemented in hardware and/or using a processor. The receiving device 108 can then organize the captured image data from the received packet and appropriately combine the image data to process and/or reconstruct the image(s) captured by one or more of the focal planes in the imager array.
In the illustrated embodiment, image data from multiple images of a scene can be captured by the array camera module 102. As the image data is captured, the array camera module 102 transmits 106 the image data to a receiving device 108. The array camera module 102 transmits the image data using a small number of local data storage cells on the array camera module 102 that store the captured image data following capture by the cameras. In the illustrated embodiment, the array camera module 102 manages the capture and transmission of image data so that the captured image data stored in the storage cells is transmitted by the imager array of the array camera module 102 in the time taken to capture and load the next set of image data into the storage cells. In this way, the array camera module can continuously buffer and transmit image data using a number of local data storage cells that is less than the total number of pixels in the array camera module.
In many embodiments, a line of image data transmitted by an imager array can be considered to equal the number of pixels in a row of a focal plane multiplied by the number of focal planes. In several embodiments, the clock frequency of transmitter circuitry on the imager array is set to a desired output data rate and the internal focal plane pixel rate is set to 1/N the desired output data rate (where N is the total number of focal planes). In many image transmission protocols, once a start of line condition is sent, all of image data is transmitted without interrupt until the end of line. Accordingly, a sufficient number of data storage cells and a buffering mechanism can be developed that starts transmission of pixels once there are sufficient pixels stored such that all of the pixels will have been captured and transmitted by the time the end of the line of image data is reached. If, for example, an imager array including 4 focal planes (as in a 1×4 array) transmits image data from all focal planes, then there is very little data storage utilized prior to the start of focal plane readout, because the data is transmitted at approximately the rate that at which it is being read. If, however, the same imager array only has one active imager, then almost all of the pixels from a row of the focal plane are stored since the buffer is being read 4 times as fast as it is being written. Therefore, the data storage requirement would be one row of pixels (i.e. ¼th of a line of image data). When three focal planes are active, 1/the data from the three focal planes is buffered before transmission commences to avoid underflow. Therefore, the total number of data storage cells utilized is equal to the number of pixels in three quarters of a row of one of the focal planes in this example. The above examples illustrate how the data storage requirements of an imager array can vary based upon the number of active focal planes. In many embodiments, the total number of storage cells within an imager array is less than a quarter of a line of image data. In several embodiments, the total number of storage cells within an imager array is equal to a line of image data. In several embodiments, the total number of data storage cells is between a quarter of a line of image data and a full line of image data. In a number of embodiments, the total number of storage cells is equal to or greater than a line of image data. When the array camera module transmits the captured image data, the incorporation of additional data describing the image data enables a peripheral device receiving the image data to reconstruct the images captured by each active camera in the imager array 102.
Imager arrays in accordance with many embodiments of the invention are configured to output image data via an interface format that accommodates the transfer of image data captured via multiple focal planes. In several embodiments, the imager array is configured to transmit captured image data in accordance with an interface format that is compatible with standard interface formats, such as (but not limited to) the MIPI CSI-2 interface format (MIPI interface format), the Camera Link interface format, and any of the Universal Serial Bus (USB) interface formats or FireWire interface formats. When image data captured from multiple focal planes is output by the imager array, the device receiving the image data is faced with the task of assembling the image data into a plurality of images of a scene.
Although specific array camera system architectures are discussed above for constructing array cameras including 1×N arrays of cameras, any of a variety of system architectures for array cameras including 1×N arrays of cameras can be utilized as appropriate to the requirements of a specific application in accordance with embodiments of the invention. Imager array architectures are discussed below in greater detail.
Imager Array Architectures
An imager array in accordance with an embodiment of the invention is illustrated in
An imager array in accordance with embodiments of the invention can include a single controller that can separately sequence and control each focal plane. Having a common controller and I/O circuitry can provide important system advantages including lowering the cost of the system due to the use of less silicon area, decreasing power consumption due to resource sharing and reduced system interconnects, simpler system integration due to the host system only communicating with a single controller rather than M×N controllers and read-out I/O paths, simpler array synchronization due to the use of a common controller, and improved system reliability due to the reduction in the number of interconnects.
Additionally, an imager array in accordance with embodiments of the invention may include a parallax disparity resolution module 220 that can determine disparity between pixels in different images captured by the camera array using parallax detection processes similar to those described in U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/691,666 entitled “Systems and Methods for Parallax Detection and Correction in Images Captured Using Array Cameras” to Venkataraman et al., the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. In particular, as will be elaborated on below in the section on “One-Dimensional Array Camera Modules”, in some embodiments, the processing requirements for a parallax disparity resolution calculation may be sufficiently low that the process may be computed by the imager array circuitry.
Although specific components of an imager array architecture are discussed above with respect to
Array Camera Modules
Array camera modules in accordance with many embodiments of the invention include the combination of an optic array including a 1×N array of lens stacks and an imager array that includes a 1×N array of focal planes. Each lens stack in the optic array defines a separate optical channel. The optic array may be mounted to an imager array that includes a focal plane for each of the optical channels, where each focal plane includes an array of pixels or sensor elements configured to capture an image. When the optic array and the imager array are combined with sufficient precision, the array camera module can be utilized to capture image data from multiple images of a scene that can be read out to a processor for further processing, e.g. to synthesize a high resolution image using super-resolution processing. For example, each of the cameras in an array camera module can capture image data of a scene reflecting a sub-pixel shifted view of the scene—i.e. relative to the corresponding image formed by at least one other camera (e.g. the lens stack of each camera can have a field-of-view that is shifted with respect to the field-of-view of each other camera so that each shift includes a sub-pixel shifted view of the scene); hence, the aggregated image data can embody sufficient sampling diversity to enable the implementation of super-resolution processes that can be used construct an enhanced image of the scene using the aggregated image data. In other words, each lens stack can form an image of a scene onto a corresponding focal plane, and thereby generate image data, from a slightly different viewpoint relative to an image formed by each of the other lens stacks, such that the images formed of the scene by each of the lens stacks contain non-redundant information of about the scene. Hence, the non-redundant information can be used in the construction of a super-resolved image.
In many embodiments, the optics in an array camera module are designed to be able to resolve images to a sufficient extent such that the super-resolution processes can be implemented. For example, in many instances, the MTF of the optics is able to resolve variation in intensity at the spatial resolution of the image that is to result from implemented super-resolution processes (e.g. as opposed to the spatial resolution of the image that can be formed by a single respective camera within an array camera module).
It should be noted that although ‘arrays of lens stacks’ and ‘arrays of focal planes’ are referenced, it is not meant to be suggested that such arrays are necessarily monolithic structures. In many instances a plurality of distinct lens stacks are disposed relative to one-another to form a 1×N array of lens stacks; similarly, in many instances a plurality of distinct focal planes are disposed relative to one-another to form a 1×N array of focal planes. In general, a plurality of lens stacks, and a plurality of focal planes can be adjoined in any suitable way to construct a 1×N array camera module in accordance with embodiments of the invention. In some instances, the focal planes and/or lens stacks are embodied within monolithic structures.
An exploded view of an array camera module formed by combining a lens stack array with a monolithic sensor including an array of focal planes in accordance with an embodiment of the invention is illustrated in
In many embodiments, the array camera module 300 includes lens stacks 320 having one or multiple separate optical lens elements axially arranged with respect to each other. Optic arrays of lens stacks 310 in accordance with several embodiments of the invention include one or more adaptive optical elements that can enable the independent adjustment of the focal length of each lens stack and/or later shifting of the centration of the refractive power distribution of the adaptive optical element. The use of adaptive optical elements is described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/650,039, entitled “Lens Stack Arrays Including Adaptive Optical Elements”, filed Oct. 11, 2012, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
In several embodiments, the array camera module employs wafer level optics (WLO) technology. WLO is a technology that encompasses a number of processes, including, for example, molding of lens arrays on glass wafers, stacking of those wafers (including wafers having lenses replicated on either side of the substrate) with appropriate spacers, followed by packaging of the optics directly with the imager into a monolithic integrated module. The WLO procedure may involve, among other procedures, using a diamond-turned mold to create each plastic lens element on a glass substrate. More specifically, the process chain in WLO generally includes producing a diamond turned lens master (both on an individual and array level), then producing a negative mold for replication of that master (also called a stamp or tool), and then finally forming a polymer replica on a glass substrate, which has been structured with appropriate supporting optical elements, such as, for example, apertures (transparent openings in light blocking material layers), and filters. Although the construction of lens stack arrays using WLO is discussed above, any of a variety of techniques can be used to construct lens stack arrays, for instance those involving precision glass molding, polymer injection molding or wafer level polymer monolithic lens processes.
Although certain array camera module configurations have been discussed above, any of a variety of array camera modules that utilize lens stacks and focal planes may be implemented in accordance with embodiments of the invention. One-dimensional array camera modules are discussed below.
One-Dimensional Array Camera Modules
In many embodiments, one-dimensional (or 1×N) array camera modules are utilized in the construction of array cameras. One-dimensional array camera modules can provide a number of benefits. For instance, one-dimensional array camera modules can enable the construction of array cameras having distinctly thin form factors. Such array cameras may be useful in a host of applications. For example, array cameras having a thin form factor may be incorporated within the bezel of a consumer electronics device such as a laptop, a tablet, or a smart phone, and may further be incorporated within a pair of eye glasses.
Additionally, array cameras that incorporate one-dimensional array camera modules are advantageous insofar as they may require less processing and/or memory requirements as compared to two-dimensional (or M×N) array cameras. For example, array cameras typically employ a parallax detection and correction process in order to facilitate the imaging of a scene. Generally, the process is meant to address the fact that the relative positioning of objects in a scene may appear to vary from the respective viewpoints of different cameras within an array camera module. In two-dimensional array cameras, this technique can be processor intensive and involve significant data storage requirements related to searches for corresponding pixels along epipolar lines (other than just horizontal or vertical) between cameras located in different rows and/or columns within the array camera module. Array camera modules typically pass image data to a processor by starting with image data captured by pixels in a first row of a focal plane and then advancing to the next row of pixels and reading out image data from pixels within the next row of pixels. The read out of image data from pixels within a focal plane can also be interspersed with the readout of image data from pixels within other focal planes. Note that with this technique, because image data is being passed to the processor along the rows of the focal planes, searches for corresponding pixels along vertical or diagonal epipolar lines, for example during a parallax detection and correction process of a two-dimensional array camera, involve the processor storing substantial amounts of image data across multiple rows of image data captured by a focal plane. In other words, whereas a parallax detection and correction process may be employed along the ‘row’ direction as soon as the image data from a respective row of focal planes has been read out to a processor, the parallax detection and correction process along the column direction cannot be employed until multiple rows of image data has been read out to the processor. Consequently, image data across multiple rows of pixels must be stored in order to complete parallax detection and correction processes. This may result in larger storage requirements that may be prohibitive of a system-on-a-chip (SOC) type solution, e.g. where the parallax disparity resolution is built into the imager array. However, because one-dimensional array cameras do not necessarily employ parallax correction and detection processes in two directions, the processing and/or memory requirements can be substantially reduced. Thus, with lesser processing and/or memory requirements, system-on-a-chip (SOC) type solutions may be enabled.
Additionally, one-dimensional array camera modules may provide greater manufacturing yield as compared with two dimensional array camera modules, because one-dimensional array camera modules may have less cameras. Generally, the more cameras an array camera module has, the more difficult it is to directly manufacture because it is more likely to have faulty sensors and/or faulty lens stacks.
A 1×5 array camera module in accordance with embodiments of the invention is illustrated in
By increasing the number of a particular type of narrow spectral band camera (e.g. Green), super-resolution processes can be employed to greater effect. A 1×7 array camera module in accordance with embodiments of the invention is illustrated in
A 1×9 array camera module in accordance with embodiments of the invention is illustrated in
Although particular one-dimensional array camera modules have been discussed, an array camera module with any number of cameras may be implemented in accordance with embodiments of the invention. For instance, 1×4 array camera modules and 1×5 array camera modules may be implemented. Sub-array modules that may be used to construct one-dimensional array camera modules are discussed below.
Sub-Array Modules
Much of the discussion above describes the construction of array cameras using a single monolithic array camera module. In many embodiments, sub-array modules are used in the construction of array cameras. Sub-array modules may be configured to interface with other sub-array modules so that data can pass between the sub-array modules, thereby enabling a processor to interact with multiple coupled sub-array modules via an interface with one of the sub-array modules. In this way, sub-array modules can couple with other sub-array modules to enable the fabrication of array cameras of any number of specified dimensions and characteristics. In many embodiments, sub-array modules do not couple with one-another, but instead interact directly or indirectly (e.g. via a bus) with a receiving device (e.g. a processor). Accordingly, sub-array modules of this variety can also enable the modular construction of an array camera of any number of specified dimensions and characteristics.
The use of sub-array modules in the construction of array cameras can provide a number of benefits. For example, the use of sub-array modules to construct array cameras can improve manufacturing yield relative to the direct fabrication of an array camera module. In particular, although one-dimensional array camera modules may be beneficial in numerous applications, their manufacture can be challenging. Specifically, components for one-dimensional array cameras (e.g. the lenses and the corresponding sensor) are typically manufactured on wafers, but the elongated nature of the components may not be conducive to optimizing wafer space. In many instances, in the manufacture of a one-dimensional lens array, the periphery of the wafer used in the manufacture may contain significant unused space that, because of the elongated shape of a lens array, cannot accommodate further lens arrays. In other words, wafers are may be more efficient in the manufacture of components that are more ‘square’ in shape than ‘elongated.’ However, sub-array modules that are used in the construction of an array camera module may be less elongated than the array camera module. Hence, sub-array modules can better optimize wafer space during manufacture.
Moreover, the manufacture of sub-array modules is also beneficial since they comprise a relatively fewer number of cameras compared to an array camera module: the more cameras an array camera module has, the more difficult it is to directly manufacture since it is more likely to have a critical number of faulty cameras. Furthermore, the manufacturing processes disclosed in prior U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/050,429 disclosure entitled “Fabrication process for mastering imaging lens arrays” can be more beneficially applied if the array to be generated is smaller like those discussed in this application. The 1×N master structure, for the sub-array, can be more optimally fine-tuned for homogeneity either by multiple attempts to directly diamond-turn the 1×N arrays of the template or by multiple attempts to step-and-repeat the 1×N array of the template from single lens pins before using the final small-variation 1×N template to fully populate, for example, a 8″ wafer scale master. As a result, the array-internal performance variation and in particular BFL-variation can be reduced. Resulting variations from array to array on the full wafer scale master can be compensated by the approach presented under the method described above.
Moreover, array camera modules constructed from sub-array modules may be further advantageous in that each individual sub-array module may incorporate custom spacers to counteract back focal length variation. U.S. Patent Application Ser. No. 61/666,852 entitled “Systems and Methods for Manufacturing Camera Modules Using Active Alignment of Lens Stack Arrays and Sensors” discusses the issues related to back focal length (BFL) misalignment in the construction of array camera modules, and is hereby incorporated by reference. In many embodiments, the distribution of the average BFL for a 1×N sub-array module fabricated in a wafer stack is determined over a sufficient number of stacks to establish the repeatable array-average BFL variation. A spacer wafer may then be machined with steps in thickness that correspond to the pattern of the average-BFL over the wafer stack, and the spacers may thereafter be incorporated into the sub array module. The standard deviation of the BFL of sub-array modules within a wafer stack is expected to be small given the relatively small number of cameras in a sub-array module; accordingly, the incorporation of the customized spacers into the sub-array modules is expected to result in sufficient focusing.
A sub-array module architecture in accordance with embodiments of the invention is illustrated in
A sub-array module in accordance with several embodiments of the invention is illustrated in
As alluded to above, in many embodiments, sub-array modules are implemented that are not required to couple with other sub-array modules; instead they each interface—either directly or indirectly—with a receiving device, such as a processor, and thereby provide image data. As can be appreciated, any suitable way for transmitting the data can be implemented. For example, image data can be transmitted in parallel, or it can be transmitted in a serial fashion. In many embodiments, sub-array modules are configured to output image data to a bus; subsequently, the image data carried by the bus (e.g. from each of many sub-array modules) can be processed into a single MIPI output that can be more easily handled by a receiving device. The image data can be transmitted to the bus in a parallel fashion, or as serial data, e.g. via low voltage differential signaling. Additionally, any suitable I/O device may be used to relay image data to a receiving device, not just a conventional bus. In this way, sub-array modules can be implemented that do not have to have, for example, distinct MIPI processing circuitry; instead, the processing of image data from many sub-array modules into a single MIPI output can be accomplished separately and more efficiently. Accordingly, the manufacture of sub-array modules can become less intricate, and their manufacturing yield may increase as a result. Further, with this modular construction, I/O devices can be easily swapped if desired. Although a particular architecture is described above, any suitable architecture can be implemented in accordance with embodiments of the invention.
Although particular sub-array modules have been illustrated and discussed, any of a variety of sub-array modules that can allow for transmission and reception of data may be implemented in accordance with embodiments of the invention. For example, 1×4, 1×2, and even 1×1 sub-array modules may be implemented. Furthermore, 2-dimensional sub-array modules may also be implemented in accordance with embodiments of the invention; for example 2×3, 2×2, and 3×3 sub-array modules may be implemented. Two-dimensional sub-array modules may be used to construct two-dimensional array camera modules. Sub-array module lens configurations and the construction of one-dimensional array camera modules using sub-array modules are discussed below.
Sub-Array Module Configurations and the Construction of One-Dimensional Array Modules
Sub-array modules may include cameras arranged in a variety of configurations in accordance with embodiments of the invention. The exact configurations employed in sub-array modules depend on the particular design of the array camera to be formed. For example, in the case where a GNRBGBRNG 1×9 array camera is desired (like the one illustrated in
The direction in which image data is passed in a sub-array module is configurable in accordance with many embodiments of the invention. For instance, a BGR sub-array module may be reconfigured so that it acts as a RGB sub-array module.
Sub-array modules may be coupled to form an array camera module in accordance with embodiments of the invention. In particular, sub-array modules may be coupled via their respective interface circuitry such that data may be passed from one sub-array module to the coupled sub-array module.
The array camera module 1000 can couple with a receiving device, e.g. a processor, such that the receiving device can synchronize the capture of images from each of the sub-array modules. In some embodiments, each of the sub-array modules has inputs and outputs that can be used to control the respective sub-array module's internal timing engine, and that can allow a processor to synchronize the capture of images. A processor can thus provide a driving signal to each of the sub-array modules that synchronizes the capture of images of the focal planes in the sub-array modules. For example, the processor can provide the signal via a bus-type architecture, where the processor is set as a master, and each of the sub-arrays is set as a slave. The processor can also provide the driving signal to a directly coupled sub-array module, and the sub-array module can then relay the driving signal to an adjacent sub-array module, and this relaying process can continue until each sub-array module is provided with a driving signal. Thus, as each of the sub-array modules is provided with the driving signal, the capture of images by the focal planes in the sub-array module can be synchronized. In many embodiments, the processor does not provide a driving signal to each sub-array module; instead, the processor provides a driving signal to a master sub-array module. The master sub-array module can then controls the slave sub-array modules so that the capture of images from the cameras of the sub-array modules is synchronized.
The driving signal can constitute a ‘horizontal sync pulse’ and a ‘vertical sync pulse’ to help facilitate the precise capture of image data. For example, when the focal planes capture image data, the image data may be captured by the pixels of the focal plane by advancing along the rows of pixels of the focal plane—i.e. image data is captured by a first row of pixels in a particular direction (e.g. left-to-right), then image data is captured by a next row of pixels, etc. Thus, a constituent horizontal sync pulse within a driving signal can synchronize the sampling and readout of a particular row of pixels within a focal plane (whichever row the vertical timing controller is pointing to at that time). The vertical sync pulse indicates to a vertical timing controller associated with a focal plane that the vertical timing controller should start at the beginning of the frame (i.e. row zero). In the case where the sub-array modules are being used to capture video, the vertical sync pulse can synchronize the capture of individual frames from each sub-array module within the video. In many embodiments, one of the sub-arrays is configured as a master that outputs the horizontal and vertical sync pulses to the other sub-arrays in the array cameras, which are designated as slaves synchronized to the control signals issued by the master sub-array. Although, a particular form of driving signal has been described, any driving signal can be used to synchronize the capture of image data in accordance with embodiments of the invention. In addition to providing inputs for receiving a ‘horizontal sync pulse’ and a ‘vertical sync pulse’ the sub-array modules can also include outputs that provide information concerning the state of the internal timing engine of the sub-array camera module. In many embodiments, the timing information is also provided using a ‘horizontal sync pulse’ and a ‘vertical sync pulse’. Similarly, although the construction of particular array camera modules is illustrated in
Furthermore, as mentioned above, in many embodiments, sub-array modules do not couple with one another, and instead interface—either directly or indirectly—with a receiving device. For example,
In many embodiments, multiple I/O devices are used in adjoining multiple sub-array modules. For example,
Note that sub-array modules of different types may be coupled to form array camera modules. For example, 1×3 sub-array modules may be combined with 1×2 sub-array modules, 1×4 sub-array modules, or even 1×1 sub-array modules. This flexibility is advantageous insofar as it can alleviate unwieldy manufacturing processes. For instance, the manufacture of sub-array modules that include near-IR cameras (e.g. a GRN sub-array module as shown in
Similarly, the particular lens fabrication technique employed in the fabrication of a sub-array module (e.g. WLO manufacturing, precision glass molding, or polymer injection molding) may be selected to accommodate the particular sub-array module's functionality and/or its manufacturing process. Of course, any number of sub-array modules, which can each be of different types, can be coupled to form an array camera module in accordance with embodiments of the invention. More generally, as an array camera module can be formed from different types of sub-array modules that can be coupled using a variety of techniques in accordance with embodiments of the invention, the constituent sub-array modules may be designed to accommodate any number of different manufacturing processes.
Moreover, sub-array modules may be combined using a single substrate that includes interconnects. For example, sub-array modules may be coupled to a substrate that has interconnects, such that when the sub-array modules are coupled to the substrate, the sub-array modules can thereby interface with each other and/or with a receiving device (e.g. a processor) via the substrate's interconnects. The interconnection of three sub-array modules coupled to a glass substrate in accordance with an embodiment of the invention is illustrated in
Using a substrate to facilitate the coupling of sub-array modules can be advantageous in that the specific configuration of the substrate can govern the spacing between the sub-array modules, and the spacing between sub-array modules can control the array camera module's imaging ability. Specifically, the manner in which the interconnects are situated can govern the sub-array module spacing. Hence, sub-array modules that are coupled need not be within immediate proximity of one another when a substrate is used to enable their coupling. Although much of the discussion above refers to the use of glass substrates, any of a variety of optically transparent substrate materials can be utilized as appropriate to the requirements of specific applications in accordance with embodiments of the invention. Furthermore, substrates in which openings are formed to permit transmission of light through the substrate can also be utilized including (but not limited to) ceramic substrates in which through holes are formed. Thus, for example, a single sensor or multiple sensors can be fixed to one side of the ceramic carrier to form the focal planes of the array camera module and lens barrels containing lens stacks can be affixed to the other side of the ceramic carrier so that the lens stacks direct light onto the focal planes of the one or more sensors through the openings in the ceramic carrier. In many instances, the ceramic carrier is rigid and has a coefficient of thermal expansion that matches that of the sensor. Thus, the likelihood that mismatches in thermal expansion will result in changes in the alignment between the lens stacks and corresponding focal planes that deteriorate the quality of the images that can be synthesized using the image data captured by the focal planes. U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/904,947 to Mark Rodda et al. discloses the incorporation of ceramic substrates in the context of array cameras, and is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
One-dimensional array camera modules constructed from sub-array modules may also be coupled to a parallax disparity resolution module in accordance with embodiments of the invention. The parallax disparity resolution module may either a hardware parallax disparity resolution module or may be a software parallax disparity resolution module.
Although particular one-dimensional array camera modules constructed from sub-array modules have been described, many other such configurations exist in accordance with embodiments of the invention. Hence, the descriptions and corresponding figures should not be construed as limiting the scope of the invention, and are instead merely illustrative. Two-dimensional array camera modules may also be constructed from sub-array modules in accordance with embodiments of the invention, and this is discussed below.
The Construction of Two-Dimensional Array Cameras Using Sub-Array Modules
Sub-array modules may be coupled to form two-dimensional array cameras in accordance with embodiments of the invention. A 3×9 two-dimensional array camera constructed from sub-array modules in accordance with embodiments of the invention is illustrated in
In many embodiments, a two-dimensional array camera is formed from sub-array modules where a single sub-array module reads out data to a processor.
Additionally, similar to before with respect to
In constructing an array camera, an array camera module may be patterned with “π filter groups”, or alternatively “Pi filter groups.” The term Pi filter groups refers to a pattern of narrow spectral band cameras within the array camera module. Processes for patterning array cameras with Pi filter groups are described in U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/641,164, entitled “Camera Modules Patterned with π Filter Groups”, Venkataraman et al. The disclosure of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/641,164 is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. A single Pi filter group is illustrated in
In many embodiments of the invention, two-dimensional array cameras are constructed using sub-array modules wherein the sub-array modules are arranged such that Pi filter groups are implemented within the array camera.
Although the above discussion has largely focused on 1×3 sub-array modules and their implementation in the construction of array camera modules and array cameras, in many embodiments, sub-array modules have other dimensions.
Sub-array modules of any dimension can be used in the construction of array cameras in accordance with embodiments of the invention.
Furthermore, as alluded to above, two-dimensional sub-array modules may also be implemented to construct two-dimensional array cameras in accordance with embodiments of the invention. For example,
As mentioned previously, 1×1 sub-array modules may also be used to construct array cameras, and this is discussed below.
1×1 Sub-Array Modules
In accordance with many embodiments of the invention, 1×1 sub-array modules may be used to construct array cameras. Thus, for example, 1×1 sub-array modules may be used to construct either one dimensional array cameras or two-dimensional array cameras. 1×1 sub-array modules are similar to the sub-array modules discussed above except that they do not include multiple lens stacks and multiple focal planes. Instead, a 1×1 sub-array module includes a single lens stack and a sensor including single focal plane. Accordingly, the above-mentioned techniques regarding constructing array cameras from sub-array modules may also be used to construct array cameras from 1×1 sub-array modules. Using 1×1 sub-array modules to construct array cameras may confer a host of benefits. For example, Array cameras of any dimension may be constructed using 1×1 sub-array modules, and many different types of 1×1 sub-array modules may be used in the construction. For example, 1×1 sub-array modules that have different F numbers, focal lengths, image sensor formats and/or fields of view, may be used, particularly because slightly different heights of different types of 1×1 sub-array modules can be accommodated. Similarly, the different substrates and spacer thicknesses within a lens stack may be accommodated. In many embodiments, these sub-array modules are used to construct array cameras that can provide optical zoom with no moving parts. Array cameras may also incorporate 1×1 sub-array modules that are configured for near-IR sensitivity and far-IR sensitivity. Additionally, sub-array modules that implement a time-of-flight camera to provide additional depth information, may also be used in accordance with embodiments of the invention. As already discussed above, 1×1 sub-array modules are also beneficial insofar as 1×1 sub-array modules of the same type (e.g., near-IR cameras) may be constructed on the same wafer, thereby increasing manufacturing efficiencies.
In several embodiments, 1×1 sub-array modules may be assembled to form an array camera module using a variety of technique appropriate to the specific 1×1 sub-array module constructions, including any of the above discussed techniques, in accordance with embodiments of the invention. In some embodiments, the sensor of a 1×1 sub-array module is adjoined to a printed circuit board using reflow soldering. Subsequently, the respective lenses of the sub-array module may be adjoined to the sensor. Note that the lenses may be affixed to the sensor using the active alignment processes U.S. Patent Application Ser. No. 61/666,852. In a number of embodiments, the sensors of a 1×1 sub-array module are bonded to a glass substrate that includes interconnects that allow the sub-array modules and other components to interface. The corresponding lenses may also be bonded to the glass substrate. This technique is similar to that already described above.
In numerous embodiments, each sub-array module is first independently formed such that it is inclusive of the sensor and the lens stack array, and is then reflow soldered to a printed circuit board. In these embodiments, both the lens and the sensor are adapted to be capable of undergoing a reflow soldering process. This method of manufacture may be advantageous insofar as the individual sub-array modules can be evaluated prior to construction of the array camera. It may be further advantageous, as the formed sub-array modules may be easily rearranged to provide different types of array cameras.
As already alluded to above, one-dimensional array camera modules and two-dimensional array camera modules may be formed from 1×1 sub-array modules in accordance with embodiments of the invention. Of course, the particular arrangement of the 1×1 sub-array modules will govern whether a one-dimensional or a two-dimensional array camera module is achieved.
Note that when the individual sub-array modules are assembled to form an array camera, the sub-array modules may be oriented in slightly different directions with respect to one another, for example due to manufacturing tolerances and corrections for alignment. As a result, the epipolar lines of the resulting array camera may deviate with respect to the scanlines of the individual cameras. Consequently, in many embodiments, the array camera includes a processor that can perform an affine transformation in conjunction with parallax disparity resolution, in processing the images provided by the sub-array modules, to resolve the discrepancies in camera orientation.
In many embodiments, an array camera that is constructed from 1×1 sub-array modules also utilizes an external hardware block that can read in serial data from the independent 1×1 sub-array modules, and synthesize a cohesive output data stream (e.g. a MIPI serial output data stream) that can be transmitted to a receiving device, e.g. a processor. In a number of embodiments, the external hardware block can interact with the sub-array modules through a custom I2C interface to, for example, command and control the individual sub-array modules. Moreover, in several embodiments, the external hardware block includes sufficient buffer space so that it can read out all the data from the sub-array modules to the receiving device simultaneously. This may improve array camera performance, since it can mitigate any delay that results from the transmission of data to the receiving device. For example, the rolling shutter performance of the array camera may be improved, since it would be governed by the size of a single sub-array module as opposed to the size of the entire array camera. In several embodiments, the external hardware block includes circuitry to encrypt the data being read out from the camera array to enable digital rights management control. In a plethora of embodiments, the external hardware block includes circuitry to compress the data being read out from the camera array to reduce the data bandwidth requirements in the resulting output stream. Although the external hardware blocks described above is discussed in the context of constructing array cameras using 1×1 sub-array modules, similar external hardware blocks can be utilized in the construction of array cameras using a variety of sub-array modules including sub-array modules having different dimensions. Furthermore, array camera modules can be constructed using any of a variety of techniques involving fixing sub-array modules of any dimension to a substrate appropriate to the requirements of a specific application in accordance with embodiments of the invention.
Although the present invention has been described in certain specific aspects, many additional modifications and variations would be apparent to those skilled in the art. For example, sub-array modules of different types (e.g. 1×3 and 1×4) may be coupled to form an array camera module. It is therefore to be understood that the present invention may be practiced otherwise than specifically described. Thus, embodiments of the present invention should be considered in all respects as illustrative and not restrictive.
The current application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/768,523, filed Feb. 24, 2013, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4124798 | Thompson | Nov 1978 | A |
4198646 | Alexander et al. | Apr 1980 | A |
4323925 | Abell et al. | Apr 1982 | A |
4460449 | Montalbano | Jul 1984 | A |
4467365 | Murayama et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
5005083 | Grage | Apr 1991 | A |
5070414 | Tsutsumi | Dec 1991 | A |
5144448 | Hornbaker | Sep 1992 | A |
5325449 | Burt | Jun 1994 | A |
5327125 | Iwase et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5488674 | Burt | Jan 1996 | A |
5629524 | Stettner et al. | May 1997 | A |
5808350 | Jack et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5832312 | Rieger et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5880691 | Fossum et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5911008 | Hamada et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5933190 | Dierickx et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5973844 | Burger | Oct 1999 | A |
6002743 | Telymonde | Dec 1999 | A |
6005607 | Uomori et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6034690 | Gallery et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6069351 | Mack | May 2000 | A |
6069365 | Chow et al. | May 2000 | A |
6097394 | Levoy et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6124974 | Burger | Sep 2000 | A |
6137100 | Fossum et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6137535 | Meyers | Oct 2000 | A |
6141048 | Meyers | Oct 2000 | A |
6160909 | Melen | Dec 2000 | A |
6163414 | Kikuchi et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6172352 | Liu et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6175379 | Uomori et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6205241 | Melen | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6239909 | Hayashi et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6358862 | Ireland et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6443579 | Myers et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6476805 | Shum et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6477260 | Shimomura | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6502097 | Chan et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6525302 | Dowski, Jr. et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6563537 | Kawamura et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6571466 | Glenn et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6603513 | Berezin | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6611289 | Yu | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6627896 | Hashimoto et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6628330 | Lin | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6635941 | Suda | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6639596 | Shum et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6647142 | Beardsley | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6657218 | Noda | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6671399 | Berestov | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6750904 | Lambert | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6765617 | Tangen et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6771833 | Edgar | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6774941 | Boisvert et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6795253 | Shinohara | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6819328 | Moriwaki et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6819358 | Kagle et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6879735 | Portniaguine et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6903770 | Kobayashi et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6909121 | Nishikawa | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6927922 | George et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6958862 | Joseph et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
7015954 | Foote et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7085409 | Sawhney et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7161614 | Yamashita et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7199348 | Olsen et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7206449 | Raskar et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7235785 | Hornback et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7262799 | Suda | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7292735 | Blake et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7295697 | Satoh | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7369165 | Bosco et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7391572 | Jacobowitz et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7408725 | Sato | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7425984 | Chen | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7496293 | Shamir et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7564019 | Olsen | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7606484 | Richards et al. | Oct 2009 | B1 |
7620265 | Wolff | Nov 2009 | B1 |
7633511 | Shum et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7639435 | Chiang et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7646549 | Zalevsky et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7657090 | Omatsu et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7675080 | Boettiger | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7675681 | Tomikawa et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7706634 | Schmitt et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7723662 | Levoy et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7738013 | Galambos et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7782364 | Smith | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7826153 | Hong | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7840067 | Shen et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7912673 | Hébert et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7973834 | Yang | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7986018 | Rennie | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7990447 | Honda et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8000498 | Shih et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8013904 | Tan et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8027531 | Wilburn et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8044994 | Vetro et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8077245 | Adamo et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8098297 | Crisan et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8098304 | Pinto et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8106949 | Tan et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8126279 | Marcellin et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8130120 | Kawabata et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8131097 | Lelescu et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8164629 | Zhang | Apr 2012 | B1 |
8169486 | Corcoran et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8180145 | Wu et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8189065 | Georgiev et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8189089 | Georgiev | May 2012 | B1 |
8194296 | Compton | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8212914 | Chiu | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8213711 | Tam | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8231814 | Duparre | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8242426 | Ward et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8244027 | Takahashi | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8244058 | Intwala et al. | Aug 2012 | B1 |
8254668 | Mashitani et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8279325 | Pitts et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8280194 | Wong et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8289409 | Chang | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8289440 | Pitts et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8290358 | Georgiev | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8294099 | Blackwell, Jr. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8305456 | McMahon | Nov 2012 | B1 |
8315476 | Georgiev et al. | Nov 2012 | B1 |
8345144 | Georgiev et al. | Jan 2013 | B1 |
8360574 | Ishak et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8400555 | Georgiev | Mar 2013 | B1 |
8406562 | Bassi et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8411146 | Twede | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8446492 | Nakano et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8456517 | Mor et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8493496 | Freedman et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8514491 | Duparre | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8541730 | Inuiya | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8542933 | Venkataraman et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8553093 | Wong et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8559756 | Georgiev et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8565547 | Strandemar | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8577183 | Robinson | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8581995 | Lin et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8619082 | Ciurea et al. | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8648918 | Kauker et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8655052 | Spooner et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8682107 | Yoon et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8687087 | Pertsel et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8692893 | McMahon | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8773536 | Zhang | Jul 2014 | B1 |
8780113 | Ciurea et al. | Jul 2014 | B1 |
8804255 | Duparre | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8830375 | Ludwig | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8831367 | Venkataraman et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8842201 | Tajiri | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8854462 | Herbin et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8861089 | Duparre | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8866912 | Mullis | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8866920 | Venkataraman et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8866951 | Keelan | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8878950 | Lelescu et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8885059 | Venkataraman et al. | Nov 2014 | B1 |
8896594 | Xiong et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8896719 | Venkataraman et al. | Nov 2014 | B1 |
8902321 | Venkataraman et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8928793 | Mcmahon | Jan 2015 | B2 |
9019426 | Han et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9025894 | Venkataraman et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9025895 | Venkataraman et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9030528 | Shpunt et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9031335 | Venkataraman et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9031342 | Venkataraman et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9031343 | Venkataraman et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9036928 | Venkataraman et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9036931 | Venkataraman et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9041823 | Venkataraman et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9041824 | Lelescu et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9041829 | Venkataraman et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9042667 | Venkataraman et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9055233 | Mullis et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9060124 | Mullis et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9094661 | Venkataraman et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9123117 | Ciurea et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9123118 | Ciurea et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9124815 | Venkataraman et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9129183 | Venkataraman et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9129377 | Ciurea et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9143711 | McMahon | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9147254 | Ciurea et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9185276 | Roda et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9188765 | Venkataraman et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9191580 | Venkataraman et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9264592 | Rodda et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9264610 | Duparre | Feb 2016 | B2 |
20010005225 | Clark et al. | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20010019621 | Hanna et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010038387 | Tomooka et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020012056 | Trevino | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020015536 | Warren | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020027608 | Johnson | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020039438 | Mori et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020057845 | Fossum | May 2002 | A1 |
20020063807 | Margulis | May 2002 | A1 |
20020087403 | Meyers et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020089596 | Suda | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020094027 | Sato et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020101528 | Lee | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020113867 | Takigawa et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020113888 | Sonoda et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020163054 | Suda et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020167537 | Trajkovic | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020177054 | Saitoh et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030025227 | Daniell | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030086079 | Barth et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030124763 | Fan et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030140347 | Varsa | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030179418 | Wengender et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030190072 | Adkins et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030211405 | Venkataraman | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040008271 | Hagimori et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040012689 | Tinnerino | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040027358 | Nakao | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040047274 | Amanai | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040050104 | Ghosh et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040056966 | Schechner et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040061787 | Liu et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040066454 | Otani et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040071367 | Irani et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040100570 | Shizukuishi | May 2004 | A1 |
20040114807 | Lelescu et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040151401 | Sawhney et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040165090 | Ning | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040169617 | Yelton et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040170340 | Tipping et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040174439 | Upton | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040179834 | Szajewski | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040207836 | Chhibber et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040213449 | Safaee-Rad et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040218809 | Blake et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040234873 | Venkataraman | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040240052 | Minefuji et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040251509 | Choi | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040264806 | Herley | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050006477 | Patel | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050007461 | Chou et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050009313 | Suzuki et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050012035 | Miller | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050036778 | DeMonte | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050047678 | Jones et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050048690 | Yamamoto | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050068436 | Fraenkel et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050128595 | Shimizu | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050132098 | Sonoda et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050134712 | Gruhlke et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050147277 | Higaki et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050151759 | Gonzalez-Banos et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050175257 | Kuroki | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050185711 | Pfister et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050205785 | Hornback et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050219363 | Kohler | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050224843 | Boemler | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050225654 | Feldman et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050265633 | Piacentino | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050275946 | Choo et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050286612 | Takanashi | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060002635 | Nestares et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060007331 | Izumi et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060023197 | Joel | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060023314 | Boettiger et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060033005 | Jerdev et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060034003 | Zalevsky | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060038891 | Okutomi et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060049930 | Zruya et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060054780 | Garrood et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060054782 | Olsen et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060055811 | Frtiz et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060069478 | Iwama | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060072029 | Miyatake et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060087747 | Ohzawa et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060098888 | Morishita | May 2006 | A1 |
20060125936 | Gruhike et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060138322 | Costello et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060152803 | Provitola | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060157640 | Perlman et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060159369 | Young | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060176566 | Boettiger et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060187338 | May et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060197937 | Bamji et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060203113 | Wada et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060210186 | Berkner | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060214085 | Olsen | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060239549 | Kelly et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060243889 | Farnworth et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060251410 | Trutna | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060274174 | Tewinkle | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060278948 | Yamaguchi et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060279648 | Senba et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070002159 | Olsen et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070024614 | Tam | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070036427 | Nakamura et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070040828 | Zalevsky et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070040922 | McKee et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070041391 | Lin et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070052825 | Cho | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070083114 | Yang et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070085917 | Kobayashi | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070102622 | Olsen et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070126898 | Feldman | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070127831 | Venkataraman | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070139333 | Sato et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070146511 | Kinoshita et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070153335 | Hosaka | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070158427 | Zhu et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070159541 | Sparks et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070160310 | Tanida et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070165931 | Higaki | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070171290 | Kroger | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070206241 | Smith et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070211164 | Olsen et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070216765 | Wong et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070228256 | Mentzer | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070247517 | Zhang et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070257184 | Olsen et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070258006 | Olsen et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070258706 | Raskar et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070263114 | Gurevich et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070268374 | Robinson | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070296832 | Ota et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070296835 | Olsen et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070296847 | Chang et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070297696 | Hamza | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080019611 | Larkin | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080025649 | Liu et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080030597 | Olsen et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080043095 | Vetro et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080043096 | Vetro et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080054518 | Ra et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080062164 | Bassi et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080079805 | Takagi et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080080028 | Bakin et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080084486 | Enge et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080088793 | Sverdrup et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080095523 | Schilling-Benz | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080112635 | Kondo et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080118241 | Tekolste et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080131019 | Ng | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080131107 | Ueno | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080151097 | Chen et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080152215 | Horie et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080152296 | Oh et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080158259 | Kempf et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080158375 | Kakkori et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080158698 | Chang et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080187305 | Raskar et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080193026 | Horie et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080218610 | Chapman et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080219654 | Border et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080239116 | Smith | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080240598 | Hasegawa | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080247638 | Tanida et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080247653 | Moussavi et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080272416 | Yun | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080273751 | Yuan et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080278591 | Barna et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080284880 | Numata | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080298674 | Baker et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080310501 | Ward et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090050946 | Duparre et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090052743 | Techmer | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090060281 | Tanida et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090086074 | Li et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090091806 | Inuiya | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090096050 | Park | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090102956 | Georgiev | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090109306 | Shan et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090128833 | Yahav | May 2009 | A1 |
20090140131 | Utagawa et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090152664 | Klem et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090167922 | Perlman et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090179142 | Duparre et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090180021 | Kikuchi et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090200622 | Tai et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090201371 | Matsuda et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090207235 | Francini et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090225203 | Tanida et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090237520 | Kaneko et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090245573 | Saptharishi et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090263017 | Tanbakuchi | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090268192 | Koenck et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090268970 | Babacan et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090268983 | Stone | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090274387 | Jin | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090284651 | Srinivasan | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090297056 | Lelescu et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090302205 | Olsen et al. | Dec 2009 | A9 |
20090323195 | Hembree et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090323206 | Oliver et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090324118 | Maslov et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100002126 | Wenstrand et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100002313 | Duparre et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100002314 | Duparre | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100013927 | Nixon | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100053342 | Hwang et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100053600 | Tanida et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100060746 | Olsen et al. | Mar 2010 | A9 |
20100073463 | Momonoi et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100074532 | Gordon et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100085425 | Tan | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100086227 | Sun et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100091389 | Henriksen et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100097491 | Farina et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100103259 | Tanida et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100103308 | Butterfield et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100111444 | Coffman | May 2010 | A1 |
20100118127 | Nam et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100128145 | Pitts et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100133230 | Henriksen et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100133418 | Sargent et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100141802 | Knight et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100142839 | Lakus-Becker | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100157073 | Kondo et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100165152 | Lim | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100166410 | Chang et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100177411 | Hegde et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100194901 | van Hoorebeke et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100195716 | Klein et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100201834 | Maruyama et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100202683 | Robinson | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100208100 | Olsen et al. | Aug 2010 | A9 |
20100220212 | Perlman et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100231285 | Boomer et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100244165 | Lake et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100265381 | Yamamoto et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100265385 | Knight et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100281070 | Chan et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100302423 | Adams, Jr. et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100309292 | Ho et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100321595 | Chiu et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110001037 | Tewinkle | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110018973 | Takayama | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110019243 | Constant, Jr. et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110032370 | Ludwig | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110033129 | Robinson | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110043661 | Podoleanu | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110043665 | Ogasahara | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110043668 | McKinnon et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110069189 | Venkataraman et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110080487 | Mullis et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110108708 | Olsen et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110121421 | Charbon et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110122308 | Duparre | May 2011 | A1 |
20110128393 | Tavi et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110128412 | Milnes et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110149408 | Hahgholt et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110149409 | Haugholt et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110153248 | Gu et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110157321 | Nakajima et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110176020 | Chang | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110211824 | Georgiev et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110221599 | Högasten | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110221658 | Haddick et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110221939 | Jerdev | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110221950 | Oostra et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110234841 | Akeley et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110241234 | Duparre | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110242342 | Goma et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110242355 | Goma et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110242356 | Aleksic | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110255592 | Sung et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110255745 | Hodder et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110261993 | Weiming et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110267348 | Lin et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110273531 | Ito et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110274366 | Tardif | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110279721 | McMahon | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110285866 | Bhrugumalla et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110285910 | Bamji et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110292216 | Fergus et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110298917 | Yanagita | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110300929 | Tardif et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110310980 | Mathew | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110316968 | Taguchi et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110317766 | Lim et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120012748 | Pain et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120019700 | Gaber | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120026297 | Sato | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120026342 | Yu et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120039525 | Tian et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120044249 | Mashitani et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120044372 | Côté et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120069235 | Imai | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120105691 | Waqas et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120113413 | Miahczylowicz-Wolski et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120147139 | Li et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120147205 | Lelescu et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120153153 | Chang et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120154551 | Inoue | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120170134 | Bolis et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120176479 | Mayhew et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120188389 | Lin et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120188420 | Black et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120188634 | Kubala et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120198677 | Duparre | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120200734 | Tang | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120224083 | Jovanovski et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120229628 | Ishiyama et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120249550 | Akeley et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120249836 | Ali et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120262601 | Choi | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120262607 | Shimura et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120268574 | Gidon et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120287291 | McMahon et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120293695 | Tanaka | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120314033 | Lee et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120327222 | Ng et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130002828 | Ding et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130003184 | Duparre | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130010073 | Do | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130016885 | Tsujimoto et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130022111 | Chen et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130027580 | Olsen et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130033579 | Wajs | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130050504 | Safaee-Rad et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130050526 | Keelan | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130057710 | Mcmahon | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130070060 | Chatterjee | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130076967 | Brunner et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130077880 | Venkataraman et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130077882 | Venkataraman et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130088489 | Schmeitz et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130088637 | Duparre | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130107061 | Kumar et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130113899 | Morohoshi et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130113939 | Strandemar | May 2013 | A1 |
20130120605 | Georgiev et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130128068 | Georgiev et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130128069 | Georgiev et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130128087 | Georgiev et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130128121 | Agarwala et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130147979 | McMahon et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130215108 | McMahon et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130222556 | Shimada | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130223759 | Nishiyama et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130229540 | Farina et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130250123 | Zhang et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130259317 | Gaddy | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130265459 | Duparre et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130274923 | By et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130293760 | Nisenzon et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140002674 | Duparre et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140009586 | McNamer et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140076336 | Clayton et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140079336 | Venkataraman et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140092281 | Nisenzon et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140098267 | Tian et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140104490 | Hsieh et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140118493 | Sali et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140118584 | Lee | May 2014 | A1 |
20140132810 | McMahon | May 2014 | A1 |
20140176592 | Wilburn et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140192253 | Laroia | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140198188 | Izawa | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140218546 | McMahon | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140232822 | Venkataraman et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140240529 | Venkataraman et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140253738 | Mullis | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140267243 | Venkataraman et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140267286 | Duparre | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140267633 | Venkataraman et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140267762 | Mullis et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140267890 | Lelescu et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140285675 | Mullis | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140313315 | Shoham et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140321712 | Ciurea et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140333731 | Venkataraman et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140333764 | Venkataraman et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140333787 | Venkataraman et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140340539 | Venkataraman et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140347509 | Venkataraman et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140347748 | Duparre | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140354773 | Venkataraman et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140354843 | Venkataraman et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140354844 | Venkataraman et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140354853 | Venkataraman et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140354854 | Venkataraman et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140354855 | Venkataraman et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140355870 | Venkataraman et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140368662 | Venkataraman et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140368683 | Venkataraman et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140368684 | Venkataraman et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140368685 | Venkataraman et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140368686 | Duparre | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140369612 | Venkataraman et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140369615 | Venkataraman et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140376825 | Venkataraman et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140376826 | Venkataraman et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150003752 | Venkataraman et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150003753 | Venkataraman et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150009353 | Venkataraman et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150009354 | Venkataraman et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150009362 | Venkataraman et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150015669 | Venkataraman et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150035992 | Mullis | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150036014 | Lelescu et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150036015 | Lelescu et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150042766 | Ciurea et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150042767 | Ciurea et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150042833 | Lelescu et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150049915 | Ciurea et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150049916 | Ciurea et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150049917 | Ciurea et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150055884 | Venkataraman et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150091900 | Yang et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150122411 | Rodda et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150124113 | Rodda et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150124151 | Rodda et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150146030 | Venkataraman et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150312455 | Venkataraman et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20160037097 | Duparre | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160044252 | Molina | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160044257 | Venkataraman et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160057332 | Ciurea et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1839394 | Sep 2006 | CN |
101010619 | Aug 2007 | CN |
101427372 | May 2009 | CN |
101606086 | Dec 2009 | CN |
840502 | May 1998 | EP |
1201407 | May 2002 | EP |
1734766 | Dec 2006 | EP |
2026563 | Feb 2009 | EP |
2104334 | Sep 2009 | EP |
2336816 | Jun 2011 | EP |
2482022 | Jan 2012 | GB |
59025483 | Sep 1984 | JP |
64037177 | Jul 1989 | JP |
02285772 | Nov 1990 | JP |
09181913 | Jul 1997 | JP |
11142609 | May 1999 | JP |
11223708 | Aug 1999 | JP |
2000209503 | Jul 2000 | JP |
2002205310 | Jul 2002 | JP |
2002252338 | Sep 2002 | JP |
2003094445 | Apr 2003 | JP |
2003163938 | Jun 2003 | JP |
2004221585 | Aug 2004 | JP |
2005116022 | Apr 2005 | JP |
2005181460 | Jul 2005 | JP |
2005295381 | Oct 2005 | JP |
2006033493 | Feb 2006 | JP |
2006047944 | Feb 2006 | JP |
2006258930 | Sep 2006 | JP |
2007520107 | Jul 2007 | JP |
2008055908 | Mar 2008 | JP |
2008507874 | Mar 2008 | JP |
2008258885 | Oct 2008 | JP |
2009132010 | Jun 2009 | JP |
2011109484 | Jun 2011 | JP |
2013526801 | Jun 2013 | JP |
2014521117 | Aug 2014 | JP |
1020110097647 | Aug 2011 | KR |
200939739 | Sep 2009 | TW |
2007083579 | Jul 2007 | WO |
2008108271 | Sep 2008 | WO |
2008108926 | Sep 2008 | WO |
2008150817 | Dec 2008 | WO |
2009151903 | Dec 2009 | WO |
2011008443 | Jan 2011 | WO |
2011055655 | May 2011 | WO |
2011063347 | May 2011 | WO |
2011116203 | Sep 2011 | WO |
2011063347 | Oct 2011 | WO |
2011143501 | Nov 2011 | WO |
2012057619 | May 2012 | WO |
2012057620 | May 2012 | WO |
2012057621 | May 2012 | WO |
2012057622 | May 2012 | WO |
2012057623 | May 2012 | WO |
2012057620 | Jun 2012 | WO |
2012074361 | Jun 2012 | WO |
2012078126 | Jun 2012 | WO |
2012082904 | Jun 2012 | WO |
2012155119 | Nov 2012 | WO |
2013003276 | Jan 2013 | WO |
2013043751 | Mar 2013 | WO |
2013043761 | Mar 2013 | WO |
2013049699 | Apr 2013 | WO |
2013055960 | Apr 2013 | WO |
2013119706 | Aug 2013 | WO |
2013126578 | Aug 2013 | WO |
2014052974 | Apr 2014 | WO |
2014032020 | May 2014 | WO |
2014078443 | May 2014 | WO |
2014130849 | Aug 2014 | WO |
2014133974 | Sep 2014 | WO |
2014138695 | Sep 2014 | WO |
2014138697 | Sep 2014 | WO |
2014144157 | Sep 2014 | WO |
2014145856 | Sep 2014 | WO |
2014149403 | Sep 2014 | WO |
2014150856 | Sep 2014 | WO |
2014159721 | Oct 2014 | WO |
2014159779 | Oct 2014 | WO |
2014160142 | Oct 2014 | WO |
2014164550 | Oct 2014 | WO |
2014164909 | Oct 2014 | WO |
2014165244 | Oct 2014 | WO |
2014133974 | Apr 2015 | WO |
2015048694 | Apr 2015 | WO |
2015070105 | May 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
US 8,957,977, 02/2015, Venkataraman et al. (withdrawn) |
US 8,964,053, 02/2015, Venkataraman et al. (withdrawn) |
US 8,965,058, 02/2015, Venkataraman et al. (withdrawn) |
US 9,014,491, 04/2015, Venkataraman et al. (withdrawn) |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US 14/23762, Completed May 30, 2014, Mailed Jul. 3, 2014, 6 Pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US14/18116, completed May 13, 2014, 12 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US14/22118, report completed Jun. 9, 2014, 5 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US14/24407, report completed Jun. 11, 2014, 9 Pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US2014/022123, report completed Jun. 9, 2014, 5 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US13/48772, Search Completed Oct. 21, 2013, Mailed Nov. 8, 2013, 6 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US13/56065, Search Completed Nov. 25, 2013, Mailed Nov. 26, 2013, 8 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US13/59991, Search Completed Feb. 6, 2014, Mailed Feb. 26, 2014, 8 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2013/024987, Search Completed Mar. 27, 2013, Mailed Apr. 15, 2013, 14 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2013/056502, Search Completed Feb. 18, 2014, Mailed Mar. 19, 2014, 7 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2013/069932, International Filing Date Nov. 13, 2013, Search Completed Mar. 14, 2014, Mailed Apr. 14, 2014, 12 pgs. |
IPRP for International Application No. PCT/US2012/059813, International Filing Date Oct. 11, 2012, Search Completed Apr. 15, 2014, 7 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US11/36349, mailed Aug. 22, 2011, 12 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US11/64921, Completed Feb. 25, 2011, mailed Mar. 6, 2012, 17 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2013/027146, completed Apr. 2, 2013, 12 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US2009/044687, completed Jan. 5, 2010, 13 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US2010/057661, completed Mar. 9, 2011, 14 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US2012/044014, completed Oct. 12, 2012, 15 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US2012/056151, completed Nov. 14, 2012, 10 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US2012/059813,, completed Dec. 17, 2012, 8 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US12/37670, Mailed Jul. 18, 2012, Search Completed Jul. 5, 2012, 9 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US2012/58093, completed Nov. 15, 2012, 12 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US14/18084, completed May 23, 2014, 12 pgs. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/952,106, dated Aug. 16, 2012, 12 pgs. |
Baker et al., “Limits on Super-Resolution and How to Break Them”, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Sep. 2002, vol. 24, No. 9, pp. 1167-1183. |
Bertero et al., “Super-resolution in computational imaging”, Micron, 2003, vol. 34, Issues 6-7, 17 pgs. |
Bishop et al., “The Light Field Camera: Extended Depth of Field, Aliasing, and Superresolution”, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, May 2012, vol. 34, No. 5, pp. 972-986. |
Borman, “Topics in Multiframe Superresolution Restoration”, Thesis of Sean Borman, Apr. 2004, 282 pgs. |
Borman et al, “Image Sequence Processing”, Source unknown, Oct. 14, 2002, 81 pgs. |
Borman et al., “Block-Matching Sub-Pixel Motion Estimation from Noisy, Under-Sampled Frames—An Empirical Performance Evaluation”, Proc SPIE, Dec. 1998, 3653, 10 pgs. |
Borman et al., “Image Resampling and Constraint Formulation for Multi-Frame Super-Resolution Restoration”, Proc. SPIE, Jun. 2003, 5016, 12 pgs. |
Borman et al., “Linear models for multi-frame super-resolution restoration under non-affine registration and spatially varying PSF”, Proc. SPIE, May 2004, vol. 5299, 12 pgs. |
Borman et al., “Nonlinear Prediction Methods for Estimation of Clique Weighting Parameters in NonGaussian Image Models”, Proc. SPIE, 1998. 3459, 9 pgs. |
Borman et al., “Simultaneous Multi-Frame MAP Super-Resolution Video Enhancement Using Spatio-Temporal Priors”, Image Processing, 1999, ICIP 99 Proceedings, vol. 3, pp. 469-473. |
Borman et al., “Super-Resolution from Image Sequences—A Review”, Circuits & Systems, 1998, pp. 374-378. |
Bruckner et al., “Artificial compound eye applying hyperacuity”, Optics Express, Dec. 11, 2006, vol. 14, No. 25, pp. 12076-12084. |
Bruckner et al., “Driving microoptical imaging systems towards miniature camera applications”, Proc. SPIE, Micro-Optics, 2010, 11 pgs. |
Bruckner et al., “Thin wafer-level camera lenses inspired by insect compound eyes”, Optics Express, Nov. 22, 2010, vol. 18, No. 24, pp. 24379-24394. |
Capel, “Image Mosaicing and Super-resolution”, [online], Retrieved on Nov. 10, 2012. Retrieved from the Internet at URL:<http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.226.2643&rep=rep1 &type=pdf>, Title pg., abstract, table of contents, pp. 1-263 (269 total pages). |
Chan et al., “Extending the Depth of Field in a Compound-Eye Imaging System with Super-Resolution Reconstruction”, Proceedings—International Conference on Pattern Recognition, 2006, vol. 3, pp. 623-626. |
Chan et al., “Investigation of Computational Compound-Eye Imaging System with Super-Resolution Reconstruction”, IEEE, ISASSP 2006, pp. 1177-1180. |
Chan et al., “Super-resolution reconstruction in a computational compound-eye imaging system”, Multidim. Syst. Sign Process, 2007, vol. 18, pp. 83-101. |
Drouin et al., “Fast Multiple-Baseline Stereo with Occlusion”, Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on 3-D Digital Imaging and Modeling, 2005, 8 pgs. |
Drouin et al., “Geo-Consistency for Wide Multi-Camera Stereo”, Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2005, 8 pgs. |
Drouin et al., “Improving Border Localization of Multi-Baseline Stereo Using Border-Cut”, International Journal of Computer Vision, Jul. 2009, vol. 83, Issue 3, 8 pgs. |
Duparre et al., “Artificial apposition compound eye fabricated by micro-optics technology”, Applied Optics, Aug. 1, 2004, vol. 43, No. 22, pp. 4303-4310. |
Duparre et al., “Artificial compound eye zoom camera”, Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 2008, vol. 3, pp. 1-6. |
Duparre et al., “Artificial compound eyes—different concepts and their application to ultra flat image acquisition sensors”, MOEMS and Miniaturized Systems IV, Proc. SPIE 5346, Jan. 2004, pp. 89-100. |
Duparre et al., “Chirped arrays of refractive ellipsoidal microlenses for aberration correction under oblique incidence”, Optics Express, Dec. 26, 2005, vol. 13, No. 26, pp. 10539-10551. |
Duparre et al., “Micro-optical artificial compound eyes”, Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 2006, vol. 1, pp. R1-R16. |
Duparre et al., “Microoptical Artificial Compound Eyes—Two Different Concepts for Compact Imaging Systems”, 11th Microoptics Conference, Oct. 30-Nov. 2, 2005, 2 pgs. |
Duparre et al., “Microoptical telescope compound eye”, Optics Express, Feb. 7, 2005, vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 889-903. |
Duparre et al., “Micro-optically fabricated artificial apposition compound eye”, Electronic Imaging—Science and Technology, Prod. SPIE 5301, Jan. 2004, pp. 25-33. |
Duparre et al., “Novel Optics/Micro-Optics for Miniature Imaging Systems”, Proc. of SPIE, 2006, vol. 6196, pp. 619607-1-619607-15. |
Duparre et al., “Theoretical analysis of an artificial superposition compound eye for application in ultra flat digital image acquisition devices”, Optical Systems Design, Proc. SPIE 5249, Sep. 2003, pp. 408-418. |
Duparre et al., “Ultra-Thin Camera Based on Artificial Apposistion Compound Eyes”, 10th Microoptics Conference, Sep. 1-3, 2004, 2 pgs. |
Fanaswala, “Regularized Super-Resolution of Multi-View Images”, Retrieved on Nov. 10, 2012. Retrieved from the Internet at URL:<http://www.site.uottawa.ca/-edubois/theses/Fanaswala—thesis.pdf>, 163 pgs. |
Farrell et al., “Resolution and Light Sensitivity Tradeoff with Pixel Size”, Proceedings of the SPIE Electronic Imaging 2006 Conference, 2006, vol. 6069, 8 pgs. |
Farsiu et al., “Advances and Challenges in Super-Resolution”, International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology, 2004, vol. 14, pp. 47-57. |
Farsiu et al., “Fast and Robust Multiframe Super Resolution”, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, Oct. 2004, vol. 13, No. 10, pp. 1327-1344. |
Farsiu et al., “Multiframe Demosaicing and Super-Resolution of Color Images”, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, Jan. 2006, vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 141-159. |
Feris et al., “Multi-Flash Stereopsis: Depth Edge Preserving Stereo with Small Baseline Illumination”, IEEE Trans on PAMI, 2006, 31 pgs. |
Fife et al., “A 3D Multi-Aperture Image Sensor Architecture”, Custom Integrated Circuits Conference, 2006, CICC '06, IEEE, pp. 281-284. |
Fife et al., “A 3MPixel Multi-Aperture Image Sensor with 0.7Mu Pixels in 0.11Mu CMOS”, ISSCC 2008, Session 2, Image Sensors & Technology, 2008, pp. 48-50. |
Hamilton, “JPEG File Interchange Format, Version 1.02”, Sep. 1, 1992, 9 pgs. |
Hardie, “A Fast Image Super-Algorithm Using an Adaptive Wiener Filter”, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, Dec. 2007, vol. 16, No. 12, pp. 2953-2964. |
Horisaki et al., “Irregular Lens Arrangement Design to Improve Imaging Performance of Compound-Eye Imaging Systems”, Applied Physics Express, 2010, vol. 3, pp. 022501-1-022501-3. |
Horisaki et al., “Superposition Imaging for Three-Dimensionally Space-Invariant Point Spread Functions”, Applied Physics Express, 2011, vol. 4, pp. 112501-1-112501-3. |
Kang et al., “Handling Occlusions inn Dense Multi-View Stereo”, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2001, vol. 1, pp. I-103-I-110. |
Kitamura et al., “Reconstruction of a high-resolution image on a compound-eye image-capturing system”, Applied Optics, Mar. 10, 2004, vol. 43, No. 8, pp. 1719-1727. |
Krishnamurthy et al., “Compression and Transmission of Depth Maps for Image-Based Rendering”, Image Processing, 2001, pp. 828-831. |
Levoy, “Light Fields and Computational Imaging”, IEEE Computer Society, Aug. 2006, pp. 46-55. |
Li et al., “A Hybrid Camera for Motion Deblurring and Depth Map Super-Resolution,” Jun. 23-28, 2008, IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 8 pgs. Retrieved from www.eecis.udel.edu/˜jye/lab—research/08/edblur-feng.pdf on Feb. 5, 2014. |
Liu et al., “Virtual View Reconstruction Using Temporal Information”, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo, 2012, pp. 115-120. |
Nayar, “Computational Cameras: Redefining the Image”, IEEE Computer Society, Aug. 2006, pp. 30-38. |
Ng, “Digital Light Field Photography”, Thesis, Jul. 2006, 203 pgs. |
Ng et al., “Super-Resolution Image Restoration from Blurred Low-Resolution Images”, Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision, 2005, vol. 23, pp. 367-378. |
Nitta et al., “Image reconstruction for thin observation module by bound optics by using the iterative backprojection method”, Applied Optics, May 1, 2006, vol. 45, No. 13, pp. 2893-2900. |
Nomura et al., “Scene Collages and Flexible Camera Arrays”, Proceedings of Eurographics Symposium on Rendering, 2007, 12 pgs. |
Park et al., “Super-Resolution Image Reconstruction”, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, May 2003, pp. 21-36. |
Pham et al., “Robust Super-Resolution without Regularization”, Journal of Physics: Conference Series 124, 2008, pp. 1-19. |
Protter et al., “Generalizing the Nonlocal-Means to Super-Resolution Reconstruction”, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, Jan. 2009, vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 36-51. |
Radtke et al., “Laser lithographic fabrication and characterization of a spherical artificial compound eye”, Optics Express, Mar. 19, 2007, vol. 15, No. 6, pp. 3067-3077. |
Rander et al., “Virtualized Reality: Constructing Time-Varying Virtual Worlds From Real World Events”, Proc. of IEEE Visualization '97, Phoenix, Arizona, Oct. 19-24, 1997, pp. 277-283, 552. |
Rhemann et al, “Fast Cost-Volume Filtering for Visual Correspondence and Beyond”, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell, 2013, vol. 35, No. 2, pp. 504-511. |
Robertson et al., “Dynamic Range Improvement Through Multiple Exposures”, In Proc. of the Int. Conf. on Image Processing, 1999, 5 pgs. |
Robertson et al., “Estimation-theoretic approach to dynamic range enhancement using multiple exposures”, Journal of Electronic Imaging, Apr. 2003, vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 219-228. |
Roy et al., “Non-Uniform Hierarchical Pyramid Stereo for Large Images”, Computer and Robot Vision, 2007, pp. 208-215. |
Sauer et al., “Parallel Computation of Sequential Pixel Updates in Statistical Tomographic Reconstruction”, ICIP 1995, pp. 93-96. |
Shum et al., “Pop-Up Light Field: An Interactive Image-Based Modeling and Rendering System,” Apr. 2004, ACM Transactions on Graphics, vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 143-162. Retrieved from http://131.107.65.14/en-us/um/people/jiansun/papers/PopupLightField—TOG.pdf on Feb. 5. |
Stollberg et al., “The Gabor superlens as an alternative wafer-level camera approach inspired by superposition compound eyes of nocturnal insects”, Optics Express, Aug. 31, 2009, vol. 17, No. 18, pp. 15747-15759. |
Takeda et al., “Super-resolution Without Explicit Subpixel Motion Estimation”, IEEE Transaction on Image Processing, Sep. 2009, vol. 18, No. 9, pp. 1958-1975. |
Tanida et al., “Color imaging with an integrated compound imaging system”, Optics Express, Sep. 8, 2003, vol. 11, No. 18, pp. 2109-2117. |
Tanida et al., Thin observation module by bound optics (TOMBO): concept and experimental verification, Applied Optics, Apr. 10, 2001, vol. 40, No. 11, pp. 1806-1813. |
Vaish et al., “Reconstructing Occluded Surfaces Using Synthetic Apertures: Stereo, Focus and Robust Measures”, Proceeding, CVPR '06 Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition—vol. 2, pp. 2331-2338. |
Vaish et al., “Synthetic Aperture Focusing Using a Shear-Warp Factorization of the Viewing Transform”, IEEE Workshop on A3DISS, CVPR, 2005, 8 pgs. |
Vaish et al., “Using Plane + Parallax for Calibrating Dense Camera Arrays”, IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2004, 8 pgs. |
Veilleux, “CCD Gain Lab: The Theory”, University of Marland, College Park-Observational Astronomy (ASTR 310), Oct. 19, 2006, pp. 1-5 (online], [retrieved on May 13, 2014]. Retrieved from the Internet <URL: http://www.astro.umd.edu/˜veilleux/ASTR310/fall06/ccd—theory.pdf, pp. 1-5. |
Wetzstein et al., “Computational Plenoptic Imaging”, Computer Graphics Forum, 2011, vol. 30, No. 8, pp. 2397-2426. |
Wheeler et al., “Super-Resolution Image Synthesis Using Projections Onto Convex Sets in the Frequency Domain”, Proc. SPIE, 2005, 5674, 12 pgs. |
Wilburn, “High Performance Imaging Using Arrays of Inexpensive Cameras”, Thesis of Bennett Wilburn, Dec. 2004, 128 pgs. |
Wilburn et al., “High Performance Imaging Using Large Camera Arrays”, ACM Transactions on Graphics, Jul. 2005, vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 765-776. |
Wilburn et al., “High-Speed Videography Using a Dense Camera Array”, Proceeding, CVPR'04 Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 294-301. |
Wilburn et al., “The Light Field Video Camera”, Proceedings of Media Processors 2002, SPIE Electronic Imaging, 2002, 8 pgs. |
Wippermann et al., “Design and fabrication of a chirped array of refractive ellipsoidal micro-lenses for an apposition eye camera objective”, Proceedings of SPIE, Optical Design and Engineering II, Oct. 15, 2005, 59622C-1-59622C-11. |
Zhang et al., “A Self-Reconfigurable Camera Array”, Eurographics Symposium on Rendering, 2004, 12 pgs. |
Zomet et al., “Robust Super-Resolution”, IEEE, 2001, pp. 1-6. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2013/048772, Report completed Dec. 31, 2014, Mailed Jan. 8, 2015, 8 Pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US13/46002, Search Completed Nov. 13, 2013, Mailed Nov. 29, 2013, 7 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US13/62720, report completed Mar. 25, 2014, Mailed Apr. 21, 2014, 9 Pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US14/17766, report completed May 28, 2014, 9 Pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US14/18116, report completed May 13, 2014, Mailed Jun. 2, 2014, 6 Pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US14/25100, report completed Jul. 7, 2014, Mailed Aug. 7, 2014 5 Pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US2014/030692, report completed Jul. 28, 2014, Mailed Aug. 27, 2014, 7 Pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2013/039155, report completed Nov. 4, 2014, Mailed Nov. 13, 2014, 10 Pgs. |
Chen et al., “Interactive deformation of light fields”, In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH I3D 2005, pp. 139-146. |
Goldman et al., “Video Object Annotation, Navigation, and Composition”, In Proceedings of UIST 2008, pp. 3-12. |
Gortler et al., “The Lumigraph”, In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 1996, pp. 43-54. |
Hacohen et al., “Non-Rigid Dense Correspondence with Applications for Image Enhancement”, ACM Transactions on Graphics, 30, 4, 2011, pp. 70:1-70:10. |
Hasinoff et al., “Search-and-Replace Editing for Personal Photo Collections”, Computational Photography (ICCP) 2010, pp. 1-8. |
Horn et al., “LightShop: Interactive Light Field Manipulation and Rendering”, In Proceedings of I3D 2007, pp. 121-128. |
Isaksen et al., “Dynamically Reparameterized Light Fields”, In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2000, pp. 297-306. |
Jarabo et al., “Efficient Propagation of Light Field Edits”, In Proceedings of SIACG 2011, pp. 75-80. |
Joshi et al., “Synthetic Aperture Tracking: Tracking Through Occlusions”, ICCV IEEE 11th International Conference on Computer Vision; Publication [online]. Oct. 2007 [retrieved Jul. 28, 2014]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http:I/ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=4409032&isnumber=4408819>; pp. 1-8. |
Lo et al., “Stereoscopic 3D Copy & Paste”, ACM Transactions on Graphics, vol. 29, No. 6, Article 147, Dec. 2010, pp. 147:1-147:10. |
Lai et al., “A Large-Scale Hierarchical Multi-View RGB-D Object Dataset”, May 2011, 8 Pgs. |
Merkle, Philipp et al., “Adaptation and optimization of coding algorithms for mobile 3DTV”, Mobile3DTV Project No. 216503, Nov. 2008, 55 Pgs. |
Perwass et al., “Single Lens 3D-Camera with Extended Depth-of-Field”, printed from www.raytrix.de, Jan. 2012, 15 Pgs. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2014/022123, Report issued Sep. 8, 2015, Mailed Sep. 17, 2015, 4 Pgs. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2014/023762, Report issued Mar. 2, 2015, Mailed Mar. 9, 2015, 10 Pgs. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2014/024407, Report issued Sep. 15, 2015, Mailed Sep. 24, 2015, 8 Pgs. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2014/025100, Report issued Sep. 15, 2015, Mailed Sep. 24, 2015, 4 Pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2013/039155, Search completed Jul. 1, 2013, Mailed Jul. 11, 2013, 11 Pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2014/024903 report completed Jun. 12, 2014, Mailed Jun. 27, 2014, 13 Pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2014/022774 report completed Jun. 9, 2014, Mailed Jul. 14, 2014 6 Pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2014/025904 report completed Jun. 10, 2014, Mailed Jul. 10, 2014, 6 Pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2014/024947, Report Completed Jul. 8, 2014, Mailed Aug. 5, 2014, 8 Pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2014/028447, report completed Jun. 30, 2014, Mailed Jul. 21, 2014, 8 Pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2014/066229, Search Completed Mar. 6, 2015, Mailed Mar. 19, 2015, 9 Pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2014/067740, Report Completed Jan. 29, 2015, Mailed Mar. 3, 2015, 10 Pgs. |
Notice of Allowance Received, U.S. Appl. No. 12/935,504, Publication Date Jul. 18, 2014, 12 Pgs. |
Notice of Allowance Received, U.S. Appl. No. 12/952,134, Publication Date Jul. 24, 2014, 8 Pgs. |
Bishop et al. “Full-Resolution Depth Map Estimation from an Aliased Plenoptic Light Field”, ACCV 2010, Part II, LNCS 6493, pp. 186-200, 2011. |
Bishop et al., “Light Field Superresolution”, Retrieved from http://home.eps.hw.ac.uk/˜sz73/ICCP09/LightFieldSuperresolution.pdf, 9 pgs, 2009. |
Bose et al., “Superresolution and Noise Filtering Using Moving Least Squares”, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2006, 21 pgs. |
Boye et al., “Comparison of Subpixel Image Registration Algorithms”, Proc. of SPIE-IS&T Electronic Imaging, vol. 7246, pp. 72460X-1-72460X-9, 2009. |
Chen et al., “KNN Matting”, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Sep. 2013, vol. 35, No. 9, pp. 2175-2188. |
Duparre et al., “Microoptical artificial compound eyes—from design to experimental verification of two different concepts”, Proc. of SPIE, Optical Design and Engineering II, vol. 5962, pp. 59622A-1-59622A-12, 2005. |
Duparre et al., “Thin compound-eye camera”, Applied Optics, May 20, 2005, vol. 44, No. 15, pp. 2949-2956. |
Fischer et al., Optical System Design, 2nd Edition, SPIE Press, pp. 191-198, 2008. |
Fischer et al., Optical System Design, 2nd Edition, SPIE Press, pp. 49-58, 2008. |
Kutulakos et al., Occluding Contour Detection Using Affine Invariants and Purposive Viewpoint Control, Proc., CVPR 94, 8 pgs., 1994. |
Lee et al., “Electroactive Polymer Actuator for Lens-Drive Unit in Auto-Focus Compact Camera Module”, ETRI Journal, vol. 31, No. 6, Dec. 2009, pp. 695-702. |
LensVector, How LensVector Autofocus Works, printed Nov. 2, 2012 from http://www.lensvector.com/overview.html, 1 pg, 2012. |
Levin et al., “A Closed Form Solution to Natural Image Matting”, Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Feb. 2008, vol. 30, 8 Pgs. |
Levoy et al., Light Field Rendering, Proc. ADM SIGGRAPH '96, pp. 1-12, 1996. |
Mitra et al., “Light Field Denoising, Light Field Superresolution and Stereo Camera Based Refocussing using a Gmm Light Field Patch Prior”, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW), 2012 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Jun. 16-21, 2012, pp. 22-28. |
Moreno-Noguer, Francese et al., “Active Refocusing of Images and Videos”, ACM SIGGRAPH, 2007, vol. 26, pp. 1-10, retrieved on Jul. 8, 2015, Retrieved from http://doi.acm.org/1 0.1145/1276377.1276461. |
Philips 3D Solutions, “3D Interface Specifications, White Paper”, Philips 3D Solutions retrieved from www.philips.com/3dsolutions, 29 Pgs., Feb. 15, 2008. |
Polight, Designing Imaging Products Using Reflowable Autofocus Lenses, http://www.polight.no/tunable-polymer-autofocus-lens-html--11.html, 2012. |
Pouydebasquea et al., “Varifocal liquid lenses with integrated actuator, high focusing power and low operating voltage fabricated on 200 mm wafers”, Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, vol. 172, Issue 1, Dec. 2011, pp. 280-286. |
Sun et al., Image Super-Resolution Using Gradient Profile Prior, IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Jun. 23-28, 2008, 8 pgs. |
Tallon et al., “Upsampling and Denoising of Depth Maps Via Joint-Segmentation”, 20th European Signal Processing Conference, Aug. 27-31, 2012, 5 Pgs. |
Taylor, Virtual camera movement: The way of the future?, American Cinematographer 77, Sep. 2006, pp. 93-100. |
Vuong et al., “A New Auto Exposure and Auto White-Balance Algorithm to Detect High Dynamic Range Conditions Using CMOS Technology”, Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science, Oct. 22-24, 2008, 5 pages. |
Wang, Calculation of Image Position, Size and Orientation Using First Order Properties, 10 pgs., 2010. |
Wikipedia, “Polarizing Filter (Photography)”, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polarizing—filter—(photography), 5 pgs, Printed Dec. 12, 2012. |
Yang et al., “A Real-Time Distributed Light Field Camera”, Eurographics Workshop on Rendering (2002), pp. 1-10. |
Yang et al., “Superresolution Using Preconditioned Conjugate Gradient Method”, 2002, 8 pgs. |
Zhang, Qiang et al., “Depth estimation, spatially variant image registration, and super-resolution using a multi-lenslet camera”, Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 7705, Apr. 23, 2010, pp. 770505-770505-8, XP055113797 ISSN: 0277-786X, DOI: 10.1117/12.852171. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2014/064693, Report Completed Mar. 7, 2015, Mailed Apr. 2, 2015, 15 Pgs. |
Extended European Search Report for European Application EP12782935.6, report completed Aug. 28, 2014 Mailed Sep. 4, 2014, 6 Pgs. |
Extended European Search Report for European Application EP12804266.0, Report Completed Jan. 27, 2015, Mailed Feb. 3, 2015, 6 Pgs. |
Extended European Search Report for European Application EP12835041.0, Report Completed Jan. 28, 2015, Mailed Feb. 4, 2015, 6 Pgs. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2013/059991, Report Issued Mar. 17, 2015, Mailed Mar. 26, 2015, 8 Pgs. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2013/056065, Report Issued Feb. 24, 2015, Mailed Mar. 5, 2015, 4 Pgs. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2013/062720, Report Issued Mar. 31, 2015, Mailed Apr. 9, 2015, 8 Pgs. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2013/024987, Mailed Aug. 21, 2014, 13 Pgs. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2013/027146, report completed Aug. 26, 2014, Mailed Sep. 4, 2014, 10 Pgs. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2013/046002, Report issued Dec. 31, 2014, Mailed Jan. 8, 2015, 6 Pgs. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2013/056502, Report Issued Feb. 24, 2015, Mailed Mar. 5, 2015, 7 Pgs. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2013/069932, Report issued May 19, 2015, Mailed May 28, 2015, 14 Pgs. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2014/018084, Report issued Aug. 25, 2015, Mailed Sep. 3, 2015, 11 Pgs. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2014/018116, Report issued Sep. 15, 2015, Mailed Sep. 24, 2015, 12 Pgs. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2014/022118, Report issued Sep. 8, 2015, Mailed Sep. 17, 2015, 4 Pgs. |
Bennett, Eric P. et al., “Multispectral Bilateral Video Fusion”, 2007 IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 16, No. 5, pp. 1185-1194. |
Extended European Search Report for European Application EP 13810229.8, Report Completed Apr. 14, 2016, Mailed Apr. 21, 2016, p. 7. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140240528 A1 | Aug 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61768523 | Feb 2013 | US |