THIN SHEETS MADE OF AN ALUMINIUM-MAGNESIUM-SCANDIUM ALLOY FOR AEROSPACE APPLICATIONS

Information

  • Patent Application
  • 20230151473
  • Publication Number
    20230151473
  • Date Filed
    January 18, 2023
    a year ago
  • Date Published
    May 18, 2023
    a year ago
Abstract
The invention relates to a method for producing a wrought product made of an aluminum alloy composed, in wt %, of Mg: 3.8-4.2; Mn: 0.3-0.8 and preferably 0.5-0.7; Sc: 0.1-0.3; Zn: 0.1-0.4; Ti: 0.01-0.05; Zr: 0.07-0.15; Cr: <0.01; Fe: <0.15; Si<0.1; wherein the homogenization is carried out at a temperature of between 370° C. and 450° C., for between 2 and 50 hours, such that the equivalent time at 400° C. is between 5 and 100 hours, and the hot deformation is carried out at an initial temperature of between 350° C. and 450° C. The invention also relates to hot-worked products obtained by the method according to the invention, in particular sheets with a thickness of less than 12 mm. The products according to the invention are advantageous as they offer a better compromise in terms of mechanical strength, toughness and hot-formability.
Description
BACKGROUND
Field of the Invention

The invention relates to a method for producing wrought products made of an aluminum-magnesium alloy, also known as a 5XXX series aluminum alloy according to the Aluminium Association, more particularly Al—Mg alloy products containing Sc having a high mechanical strength, high toughness and good formability. The invention further relates to products obtainable by said method, as well as to the use of these products intended for transportation and in particular for aircraft and spacecraft construction.


Description of Related Art

Wrought products made of an aluminum alloy are developed in particular to produce structural elements intended for the transportation industry and in particular for the aeronautics industry and the aerospace industry. In these industries, product performance must be constantly improved and new alloys are developed in particular in order to provide a high mechanical strength, low density, high toughness, excellent corrosion resistance and very good formability. In particular, forming can take place under heat, for example by creep forming, and the mechanical properties must not deteriorate after this forming process.


Al—Mg alloys have been extensively studied in the transportation industry, in particular that of road and sea transportation, due to the excellent properties thereof for use in such industries, such as the weldability, corrosion resistance and formability thereof, in particular in low-worked tempers such as the O temper and H111 temper.


However, these alloys have a relatively low mechanical strength for the aeronautics industry and aerospace industry.


U.S. Pat. No. 5,624,632 discloses an alloy composed of 3-7 wt % magnesium, 0.03-0.2 wt % zirconium, 0.2-1.2 wt % manganese, up to 0.15 wt % silicon and 0.05-0.5 wt % of an element forming dispersoids in the group consisting of scandium, erbium, yttrium, gadolinium, holmium and hafnium.


U.S. Pat. No. 6,695,935 discloses an alloy composed, in wt %, of Mg 3.5-6.0, Mn 0.4-1.2, Zn 0.4-1.5, Zr max. 0.25, Cr max. 0.3, Ti max. 0.2, Fe max. 0.5, Si max. 0.5, Cu max. 0.4, and one or more elements in the group: Bi 0.005-0.1, Pb 0.005-0.1, Sn 0.01-0.1, Ag 0.01-0.5, Sc 0.01-0.5, Li 0.01-0.5, V 0.01-0.3, Ce 0.01-0.3, Y 0.01-0.3, and Ni 0.01-0.3. Patent application WO 01/12869 discloses an alloy composed, in wt %, of 1.0-8.0 wt % Mg, 0.05-0.6 wt % Sc, 0.05-0.20 wt % Hf and/or 0.05-0.20 wt % Zr, 0.5-2.0 wt % Cu and/or 0.5-2.0 wt % Zn and additionally 0.1-0.8 wt % Mn.


Patent application WO2007/020041 discloses an alloy composed, in wt %, of Mg 3.5 to 6.0, Mn 0.4 to 1.2, Fe<0.5, Si<0.5, Cu<0.15, Zr<0.5, Cr<0.3, Ti 0.03 to 0.2, Sc<0.5, Zn<1.7, Li<0.5, Ag<0.4, optionally one or more elements forming dispersoids in the group consisting of erbium, yttrium, hafnium, and vanadium, each <0.5 wt %.


The products described in these patents are not sufficient in terms of offering a compromise between mechanical strength, toughness and hot-formability. In particular, it is important that the mechanical properties do not deteriorate after heat treatment at 300-350° C., which is a typical temperature for forming.


There is thus a need for wrought products made of an Al—Mg alloy with a low density and improved properties compared to those of known products, in particular in terms of mechanical strength, toughness and hot-formability. Moreover, such product must be obtainable according to a reliable and cost-effective production process that can be easily adapted to a conventional production line.


SUMMARY

The invention firstly relates to a method for producing a wrought product made of an aluminum alloy wherein:

    • a) a molten metal bath having an aluminum base is produced, composed, in wt %, of
      • Mg: 3.8-4.2;
      • Mn: 0.3-0.8; preferably 0.5-0.7;
      • Sc: 0.1-0.3;
      • Zn: 0.1-0.4;
      • Ti: 0.01-0.05, preferably 0.015-0.030;
      • Zr: 0.07-0.15, preferably 0.08-0.12;
      • Cr: <0.01;
      • Fe: <0.15;
      • Si<0.1;
      • other elements ≤0.05 each and ≤0.15 combined, the remainder being aluminum;
    • b) an unwrought product is cast from said metal bath;
    • c) said unwrought product is homogenized at a temperature that lies in the range 370° C. to 450° C., for a duration that lies in the range 2 to 50 hours such that the equivalent time at 400° C. lies in the range 5 to 100 hours, the equivalent time t(eq) at 400° C. being defined by the formula:







t

(

e

q

)

=





exp

(


-
2


9

1

2


2
/
T


)


d

t



exp

(


-
2


9

1

2


2
/

T
ref



)










      • where T is the current temperature expressed in Kelvin, which changes over time t (in hours) and Tref is a reference temperature of 400° C. (673 K), t(eq) being expressed in hours, the constant Q/R=29122 K being derived from the activation energy for the diffusion of Zr, Q=242000 J/mol,



    • d) the unwrought product thus homogenized is hot-worked with an initial temperature in the range 350° C. to 450° C. and is optionally cold-worked;

    • e) a flattening and/or straightening process is optionally carried out;

    • f) an annealing process is optionally carried out at a temperature that lies in the range 300° C. to 350° C.





The invention secondly relates to a wrought product made of an aluminum alloy having the composition, in wt %,


Mg: 3.8-4.2;


Mn: 0.3-0.8, preferably 0.5-0.7;


Sc: 0.1-0.3;


Zn: 0.1-0.4;


Ti: 0.01-0.05, preferably 0.015-0.030;


Zr: 0.07-0.15, preferably 0.08-0.12;


Cr: <0.01;


Fe: <0.15;


Si<0.1;


other elements ≤0.05 each and ≤0.15 combined, the remainder being aluminum; obtainable by the method according to the invention.







DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF A PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

Unless specified otherwise, all of the indications concerning the chemical composition of the alloys are expressed as a percentage by weight based on the total weight of the alloy. By way of example, the expression 1.4 Cu means that the copper content expressed in wt % is multiplied by 1.4. The designation of the alloys is provided in accordance with the regulations of The Aluminium Association, known to those skilled in the art.


The definitions of the tempers are indicated in European standard EN 515 (1993). The tensile static mechanical properties, in other words the ultimate tensile strength Rm, the tensile yield stress at 0.2% elongation Rp0.2, and the elongation at rupture A %, are determined by a tensile test according to standard NF EN ISO 6892-1 (2009), whereby the sampling and the direction of the test are defined by standard EN 485-1 (2016). The plane strain toughness is determined by a curve of the stress intensity factor KR as a function of the effective crack growth Δaeff known as the R-curve, according to standard ASTM E 561 (2010). The critical stress intensity factor KC, in other words the intensity factor that makes the crack unstable, is calculated from the R-curve. The stress intensity factor KCO is also calculated by assigning the initial crack length to the critical load, at the start of monotonic loading. These two values are calculated for a specimen of the required form. Kapp represents the factor KCO corresponding to the specimen that was used to carry out the R-curve test. Keff represents the factor KC corresponding to the specimen that was used to carry out the R-curve test. KR60 corresponds to the value of KR for an effective crack growth Δaeff=60 mm.


Within the scope of the invention, the grain structure of the samples is characterized in the plane LxTC at mid-thickness, t/2, and is quantitatively assessed after metallographic etching of the anodic oxidation type under polarized light:

    • the term “essentially non-recrystallized” is used when the grain structure has no or few recrystallized grains, generally less than 20%, preferably less than 15% and more preferably less than 10% of the grains are recrystallized;
    • the term “recrystallized” is used when the grain structure has a significant proportion of recrystallized grains, generally more than 50%, preferably more than 60% and more preferably more than 80% of the grains are recrystallized.


Unless specified otherwise, the definitions of standard EN 12258-1 (1998) apply.


Within the scope of the present invention, a “structural element” of a mechanical construction means a mechanical part for which the static and/or dynamic mechanical properties are particularly important to the performance of the structure and for which a structural calculation is usually prescribed or carried out. These are generally elements whose malfunction is likely to jeopardize the safety of said construction, of its users or of other persons. For an aircraft, these structural elements in particular include the elements that comprise the fuselage (such as the fuselage skin, fuselage stiffeners or stringers, bulkheads, circumferential frames, wings (such as the upper or lower wing skin), stringers or stiffeners, ribs, spars, floor beams and seat tracks) and the tail unit in particular comprised of horizontal or vertical stabilizers, as well as the doors.


The inventors hereof have observed that, for a composition according to the invention, an advantageous wrought product can be obtained by controlling the homogenization conditions, the mechanical properties of which advantageous wrought product offer a compromise between mechanical strength and useful toughness for the aircraft construction industry, and the properties whereof are stable after heat treatment corresponding to hot-forming conditions.


According to the invention, a molten metal bath having an aluminum base is produced composed, in wt %, of Mg: 3.8-4.2; Mn: 0.3-0.8, preferably 0.5-0.7; Sc: 0.1-0.3; Zn: 0.1-0.4; Ti: 0.01-0.05, preferably 0.015-0.030; Zr: 0.07-0.15, preferably 0.08-0.12; Cr: <0.01; Fe: <0.15; Si<0.1; other elements ≤0.05 each and ≤0.15 combined, the remainder being aluminum.


The composition according to the invention is noteworthy as a result of the low quantity of added titanium from 0.01-0.05 and preferentially from 0.015 to 0.030 wt % and preferably from 0.018 to 0.024 wt % and as a result of the absence of added chromium, the content whereof is less than 0.01 wt %. The high static mechanical properties (Rp0.2, Rm) are obtained despite these small additions, as a result of the carefully-controlled homogenization conditions. Thus, surprisingly, recrystallisation can be prevented during the hot-forming process with low quantities of added titanium and without added chromium, while simultaneously procuring high static mechanical properties, which were in particular possible to obtain by adding high quantities of Cr and Ti, and a high toughness.


Mn, Sc, Zn and Zr must be added in order to obtain the desired compromise between the mechanical strength, toughness and hot-formability. The iron content is kept below 0.15 wt %, and preferably below 0.1 wt %. The silicon content is kept below 0.1 wt %, and preferably below 0.05 wt %. The presence of iron and silicon in excess of the aforementioned maximum values has a negative impact, in particular on toughness. The remaining elements are impurities, i.e. elements whose presence is unintentional, the presence whereof must be limited to 0.05% each and to 0.15% combined and preferably to 0.03% each and to 0.10% combined.


According to the invention, said unwrought product is homogenized at a temperature that lies in the range 370° C. to 450° C., for a duration that lies in the range 2 to 50 hours such that the equivalent time at 400° C. lies in the range 5 to 100 hours,

    • the equivalent time t(eq) at 400° C. being defined by the formula:







t

(

e

q

)

=





exp

(


-
2


9

1

2


2
/
T


)


d

t



exp

(


-
2


9

1

2


2
/

T
ref



)






wherein T is the current temperature expressed in Kelvin, which changes over time t (in hours) and Tref is a reference temperature of 400° C. (673 K), t(eq) being expressed in hours, the constant Q/R=29122 K being derived from the activation energy for the diffusion of the Zr, Q=242000 J/mol.


Preferably, the homogenization duration lies in the range 5 to 30 hours. Advantageously, the equivalent time at 400° C. lies in the range 6 to 30 hours.


A too low homogenization temperature and/or a too short homogenization duration does not allow for the formation of dispersoids to control recrystallisation. Surprisingly, when the homogenization temperature is too high and/or when the homogenization duration is too long, the properties obtained are unstable at the conventional hot-forming temperature of 300-350° C., in particular since the products recrystallize.


Hot working can be carried out immediately after homogenization without cooling to ambient temperature, whereby the initial hot working temperature must lie in the range 350 to 450° C. Alternatively, the unwrought product can be cooled to ambient temperature after homogenization and then reheated to an initial hot working temperature that lies in the range 350 to 450° C. In the case of reheating, the equivalent time at 400° C. during reheating must be kept low, generally less than 10%, compared to the equivalent time at 400° C. during homogenization.


During hot working, the temperature of the metal can, in some cases, rise, however the equivalent time at 400° C. during hot working must be kept low, generally less than 10%, compared to the equivalent time at 400° C. during homogenization. In any case, the temperature during hot working must preferably not exceed 460° C. and preferentially not exceed 440° C. After hot working, cold working can be carried out.


In a first embodiment, working is carried out by rolling in order to obtain a sheet metal. In this first embodiment, the final thickness of the sheet metal obtained is less than 12 mm.


In a second embodiment, working is carried out by extrusion in order to obtain a profile.


In a first embodiment, hot working is generally carried out until a thickness of about 4 mm is reached, then cold working is carried out for a thickness that lies in the range 0.5 to 4 mm.


After the hot- and optionally cold-working process, a flattening and/or straightening operation can advantageously be carried out. During flattening and/or straightening operations, the permanent set is generally less than 2%, preferably less than about 1%. An annealing process is optionally performed at a temperature that lies in the range 300° C. to 350° C. The annealing time generally lies in the range 1 to 4 hours. The main purpose of this annealing process is to stabilize the mechanical properties such that they are not altered during a subsequent forming process at a similar temperature. The products according to the invention have the advantage of having very stable mechanical properties at this temperature. Thus, for products whose final thickness of 4 to 6 mm is obtained by hot rolling, the static mechanical property variation is no greater than 10% and preferably no greater than 6% after annealing between 300 and 350° C., and for products whose final thickness of about 2 mm is obtained by cold rolling, the static mechanical property variation is no greater than 40% and preferably no greater than 30% after annealing between 300 and 350° C. Within the scope of the method according to the invention, it is thus possible not to perform a stabilizing annealing process and to immediately carry out forming, in particular for products whose final thickness is obtained by hot rolling. Thanks to the method of the invention, the products according to the invention retain an essentially non-recrystallized grain structure after annealing at between 300 and 350° C.


Sheet metal having a thickness of less than 12 mm obtained by the method of the invention is advantageous, preferably having the following characteristics:


(a) a tensile yield stress measured at 0.2% elongation in the LT direction of at least 250 MPa, and preferably of at least 260 MPa and/or


(b) a tensile yield stress measured at 0.2% elongation in the L direction of at least 260 MPa, and preferably of at least 270 MPa, whereby these properties are achieved even in the case wherein the optional annealing step at a temperature in the range 300° C. to 350° C. is carried out.


Advantageously, sheet metal having a thickness of less than 4 mm obtained by the method of the invention has a tensile yield stress measured at 0.2% elongation in the LT direction of at least 300 MPa, and preferably of at least 320 MPa, whereby these properties are achieved even in the case wherein the optional annealing step at a temperature in the range 300° C. to 350° C. is carried out.


The sheet metal according to the invention preferably has advantageous toughness properties, in particular:


(c) a toughness KR60, measured on specimens of type CCT760 in the L-T direction (where 2ao=253 mm), for an effective crack growth Δaeff of 60 mm, of at least 155 MPa √{square root over (m)}, and preferably of at least 165 MPa √{square root over (m)} and/or


(d) a toughness KR60, measured on specimens of type CCT760 in the T-L direction (where 2ao=253 mm), for an effective crack growth Δaeff of 60 mm, of at least 160 MPa √{square root over (m)}, and preferably of at least 170 MPa √{square root over (m)}.


Preferably, for the products according to the invention, the toughness KR in the T-L direction is greater than that in the L-T direction.


Preferably, the toughness Kapp, measured on specimens of type CCT760 in the T-L direction (where 2ao=253 mm), is at least 125 MPa, and preferably at least 130 MPa. The products according to the invention can be formed at a temperature that lies in the range 300° C. to 350° C. in order to obtain structural elements for an aeroplane, preferably fuselage elements.


Aircraft fuselage elements according to the invention are advantageous because they have

    • (a) a tensile yield stress measured at 0.2% elongation in the LT direction of at least 250 MPa, and preferably of at least 260 MPa and/or
    • (b) a tensile yield stress measured at 0.2% elongation in the L direction of at least 260 MPa, and preferably of at least 270 MPa.


EXAMPLES
Example 1

A plurality of slabs with a thickness of 400 mm were cast, the composition whereof is provided in Table 1.









TABLE 1







Composition in wt %


(analyzed by spark optical emission spectrometry, S-OES).

















Si
Fe
Cr
Mn
Mg
Zn
Ti
Zr
Sc





A
0.02
0.05
<0.01
0.62
4.05
0.28
0.023
0.10
0.19


B
0.02
0.04
<0.01
0.59
3.99
0.29
0.038
0.10
0.19









The slab made of alloy A was homogenized for 5 h at 445° C., whereas the slab made of alloy B was homogenized for 15 h at 515° C. The slabs thus homogenized were hot rolled immediately after homogenization with a hot-rolling starting temperature of 415° C. for slab A and 480° C. for slab B, in order to obtain 4 mm thick sheets.


The tensile static mechanical properties of the sheet made of alloy A remained high, both in the hot-rolled temper (HR) and in the annealed temper (annealing treatment for 4 h at 325° C.), whereas those of the sheet made of alloy B deteriorated after annealing.









TABLE 2







Static mechanical properties obtained for the different sheet in the


hot-rolled temper (HR) and in the annealed temper (4 h at 325° C.).










Alloy A sheet
Alloy B sheet



Thickness 4 mm
Thickness 4 mm












HR
Annealing
HR
Annealing














Rp0.2 L, MPa
303
289
287
233


Rm L, MPa
400
393
364
352


A L, %
14.5
16.2
14.8
17.6


Rp0.2 LT, MPa
311
292
276
238


Rm LT, MPa
396
387
361
349


A LT, %
17.7
19.5
18.2
23.0


Kapp MPa✓m L-T
129.9
129.1
128.5



Kapp MPa✓m T-L
134.9
134.0
125.8



Kr60 MPa✓m L-T
172.9
171.5
171.2



Kr60 MPa✓m T-L
178.9
177.1
164









The 4-mm sheets were cold rolled to a thickness of 2 mm by three passages, without intermediate heat treatment, then underwent flattening. Different heat treatments were carried out after cold rolling. The tensile mechanical test results are shown in table 3.









TABLE 3







Static mechanical properties obtained for the different cold-rolled


sheets having undergone annealing under different conditions.










Alloy A sheet
Alloy B sheet


Annealing
Thickness 2 mm
Thickness 2 mm













after cold
Rp02
Rm
A %
Rp02
Rm
A %


rolling
(LT)
(LT)
LT
(LT)
(LT)
LT

















417
466
9.95
358
422
10.5


2 h 275° C.
349.5
415
19
256
355
18.2


2 h 325° C.
333
405
21.7
168
311
23.0


2 h 375° C.
297.5
393
21.4
156
301
23.1









The grain structure of the sheets was observed after metallographic etching of the anodic oxidation type under polarized light after cold rolling (CR) or after cold rolling and annealing for 2 h at 325° C.


A qualitative assessment of the microstructure was carried out:


Table 4 shows the results of the microstructural observations of the sheets of compositions A and B in the unwrought cold rolling temper and after annealing treatment (2 h at 325° C.).









TABLE 4







Microstructure (plane LxTC, at mid-thickness) of the sheets









Alloy
Reference
Microstructure





A
CR
Appreciably non-recrystallized



2 h 325° C.
Appreciably non-recrystallized


B
CR
Appreciably non-recrystallized



2 h 325° C.
Recrystallized









Alloy A according to the invention has excellent recrystallisation resistance.


Example 2

This example studied the effect that the homogenization conditions before hot working have on the mechanical properties. Blocks made of alloy A of dimensions 250×180×120 mm were hot rolled under different conditions until obtaining a thickness of 8 or 12 mm. The conditions are described in Table 5.









TABLE 5







Transformation conditions of the different blocks made of alloy A

















Initial





Homogenization
Homogenization
T(eq)
rolling
Final
Final rolling



temperature
duration
at
temperature
thickness
temperature



(° C.)
(h)
400° C.
(° C.)
(mm)
(° C.)
















CD2
450
15
298
440
12
329


CD3
400
15
15
390
12
319


CD4
450
15
298
440
8
325


CF1
450
5
99
440
8
330


CF2
450
5
99

12
327


CF3
400
5
5
405
12
320


CF4
515
17
9341

8
325









The mechanical properties were measured on the sheets having undergone rolling or a treatment. The results are presented in Table 6.









TABLE 6







Static mechanical properties obtained for the different sheets in the


hot rolled temper (HR) and in the annealed temper (4 h at 325° C.).













Annealing for 4 h




HR
at 325° C.
















Rp0.2
Rm
A
Rp0.2
Rm
A


block
direction
MPa
MPa
%
MPa
MPa
%





CD2
L
251
377
15.4
243
370
16.0


CD3
L
286
398
14.5
278
391
15.4


CD4
L
260
371
13.6
252
366
16.7


CF1
L
275
381
16.1
267
373
17.1


CF2
L
268
390
12.9
262
382
13.8


CF3
L
288
399
14.8
280
392
15.4


CF4
L
223
341
15.7
209
339
17.3









The products obtained by the method according to the invention (CD3, CF1, CF2, CF3) have advantageous mechanical properties, in particular Rp0.2 in the L direction of at least 260 MPa after hot rolling and after annealing for 4 h at 325° C.

Claims
  • 1. A method for producing a wrought product made of an aluminum alloy comprising: a) producing a molten metal bath having an aluminum base, comprising, in wt %, Mg: 3.8-4.2;Mn: 0.3-0.8;Sc: 0.1-0.3;Zn: 0.1-0.4;Ti: 0.01-0.05;Zr: 0.07-0.15;Cr: <0.01;Fe: <0.15;Si<0.1;other elements ≤0.03 each and ≤0.10 combined, the remainder being aluminum;b) casting an unwrought product from said metal bath;c) homogenizing said unwrought product at a temperature that lies in a range of from 370° C. to 450° C., for a duration that lies in a range of from 2 to 50 hours such that the equivalent time at 400° C. lies in a range of from 5 to 100 hours, the equivalent time t(eq) at 400° C. being defined by formula:
  • 2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the homogenization duration lies in a range of from 5 to 30 hours.
  • 3. The method according to claim 1, wherein working is carried out by rolling in order to obtain a sheet and wherein a final thickness of the sheet obtained is less than 12 mm.
  • 4. The method according to claim 1, wherein working is carried out by extrusion in order to obtain a profile.
  • 5. The method according to claim 1, wherein at the end of f), forming is carried out at a temperature that lies in a range of from 300° C. to 350° C.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, wherein in a), the aluminum base comprises, in wt %, Mg: 3.8-4.2;Mn: 0.5-0.7;Sc: 0.1-0.3;Zn: 0.1-0.4;Ti: 0.015-0.030;Zr: 0.08-0.12;Cr: <0.01;Fe: <0.15;Si<0.1;other elements ≤0.03 and ≤0.10 combined, the remainder being aluminum.
  • 7. The method of claim 1, wherein in c), the equivalent time at 400° C. is in a range of from 6 to 30 hours.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
1660049 Oct 2016 FR national
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 16/342,096, filed 15 Apr. 2019, which is a National Stage entry of International Application No. PCT/FR2017/052856 filed 17 Oct. 2017, which claims priority to French Patent Application No. 1660049, filed 17 Oct. 2016, the contents of each of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.

Divisions (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 16342096 Apr 2019 US
Child 18156074 US