The present invention relates to a device for cutting the threads in a sewing machine, which operates with one lower and at least one upper thread.
Thread cut devices for sewing machines, using an upper thread and a lower thread, are used to automatically cut one or both threads. When a cut has been performed during a cut sequence a specific amount of thread has been consumed, since a short piece of thread is normally left under a fabric on which stitches are sewn. Furthermore, a short piece of thread goes through an eye of a needle involved in the stitches, in a known way, and will be consumed when the sewing starts again after a cut sequence. The total thread length used for the sewing of a stitch sequence will therefore be the sum of the thread used for the stitches plus the sum of the thread length that goes out of the eye of the needle at the start of the stitch sequence and the thread length pulled down under the fabric after a cut performed at the end of the stitch sequence.
During specific types of use of a sewing machine, e.g. in embroidery mode, said thread length consumed for the pull down of thread under the fabric can be used when an extra thread consumption is desirable. One example of a situation where an upper thread consumption could be preferable is connected with systems for thread colouring, such as in the sewing machine described in US 20070245940 A1. Said document states that a thread cut may be used to compensate for a possibly incorrect position of a colour change point of the upper thread in relation to a desired colour change of the upper thread as specified according to stitch data. The principle discussed in said document is based on the assumption that a faulty position of the colour change point of the upper thread, after a cut has been performed, is positioned below the fabric. This implies that the position of the thread colour change point is positioned on the piece of thread that has been pulled down under the fabric for carrying out the cut. On conventional sewing machines, provided with a thread cutter controlled by a processor, a typical length of the upper thread pulled out for the cut is around 25 mm (herein referred to as length d). This length d limits the possibilities to adjust a greater error of the position of the colour change point, as well as it limits the possibility for the performance of fine adjustment of the thread length consumed during a cut of the thread.
The present invention is devoted to a method for cutting at least an upper thread of a sewing machine, wherein a length of the thread consumed for a cut can be set within a predetermined interval.
According to one aspect of the invention a method with the characteristics of the appended claim 1 is presented.
According to a further aspect of the invention a sewing machine with the characteristics of the enclosed independent device claim is presented.
Further aspects and embodiments of the invention are presented in the dependent claims.
One advantage with the use of the method of the invention is that the length of the at least upper thread consumed in a cut can be controlled by the processor of the sewing machine. This circumstance can be used for different purposes and can be used as an operating step possible to be programmed into a program controlling the operation of the sewing machine. As one example, the thread cutter can be ordered to cut the upper thread, wherein the thread consumed in the cut is set to amount to a predetermined length. The extra upper thread length provided can then be used e.g. to hide a colour change point on the under side of the fabric used or to assess a definite predetermined length being consumed for other purposes, such as the possibility of fine adjustments.
The cut described and performed according to the invention can also be used to increase the consumption of upper thread for other purposes, e.g. to prevent the thread from being pulled out of the eye of the needle after a cut. This is a problem in some sewing machine systems, because the thread length consumed in a cut can not be set freely. The thread length after a cut carried out according to the inventive method results in an increased thread length consumed on both sides of the fabric, i.e. the length of the thread extending through the eye of the needle will also be increased in the same proportion. By increasing the amount of the upper thread extending through the eye of the needle the risk of the thread being pulled out from the eye is reduced.
a-4d shows an example of a thread cutter according to prior art, wherein different positions of a thread fetcher for catching the upper and under thread during a cut sequence is illustrated.
Below the invention will be explained in greater detail by description of embodiments with reference to the accompanying drawings.
Current thread cut systems used in a conventional sewing machine provided with a processor controlled thread cutter are designed to automatically cut one or both threads, i.e. the upper thread or both the upper thread and the under thread. One side effect of such an automatically performed thread cut is that some thread is consumed when a cut sequence is performed. As stated, this fact may be utilized when extra thread consumption is desirable.
The amount of thread consumed when a thread cut is performed is normally constant (length d is consumed). However, when the reason for performing a cut partly is to consume some thread, it would be desirable to be able to specify the amount of thread that shall be consumed. The present invention provides and describes an algorithm that makes it possible to consume an arbitrary amount of thread within a given interval, when a thread cut is performed.
By way of example, a lock stitch sewing machine for performing the inventive method is described in
The machine is provided with a control program which, for example, is stored in a processor C. Further the sewing machine has an available memory M, preferably being accommodated in the machine, although the memory M as well may be external and accessible from the processor C. In the memory M sewing machine embroidery elements for composing embroideries may be stored in the form of stitch data. A display 11 is provided, on which the images representing embroidery elements can be displayed to a user.
In
Note: Generally, the term embroidery frame is referred to as a fabric clamping member and as such used in the claims as other types of devices than frames could be used for the same purpose and as such being controlled by the embroidery unit.
When conventional embroidery is performed in an embroidery machine of the discussed type the machine controls the movements of the embroidery frame fully according to stitch data stored in the memory M of the sewing machine according to all aspects concerning stitch types, sewing directions and so on according to prior art.
The sewing machine 1 is further provided with a thread cutter 10 for cutting the upper thread 4 or both threads 3, 4 between stitch sequences. A thread cutter 10 is symbolically shown in
The program steps performed according to an algorithm controlling a thread cut according to prior art is listed below. In order to understand the process steps some abbreviations used are listed in the table below. A flow chart describing the different steps of the algorithm is illustrated in
The software control algorithm for controlling a cut according to prior art:
A thread cut system for setting the thread length consumed during a cut according to the invention is described hereafter.
When a cut with a predetermined thread length consumption d+x shall be performed some additional actions are necessary (compared to a cut with fixed (d) thread length consumption). The differences between a cut sequence with fixed thread consumption d and a cut with a variable predetermined thread consumption d+x is made clear by studying
The additional length x of the upper thread 4 is according to the invention during a cut performed by first feeding the appropriate amount of upper thread 4 with the upper thread control system using the thread feeder 15 (An example of a thread feeder for actually feeding a thread out, instead of conventionally drawing the thread out from a thread store utilizing e.g. a take-up-lever, is described in document U.S. Pat. No. 7,240,628). When the thread has been fed the embroidery unit is moved to pull out the appropriate amount of thread under and above the fabric 2 respectively, i.e. the same amount of extra thread is provided under and above the fabric respectively. The extra thread consumed x (depending on an amount x/2 being drawn on each side of the fabric) corresponds to the movement carried out by the embroidery unit. The extra thread length x can be infinitely variable within an interval determined by highest possible displacement carried out by the embroidery unit. However, the thread consumption can never be lower than the amount of thread d (approx. 25 mm) consumed when a “normal” cut is performed.
The embroidery unit, as previously stated, controls the displacement of the fabric, e.g. by moving an embroidery frame 20, wherein the fabric 2 is clamped. The extra length x of the thread, when a cut is performed according to the present invention, wherein the embroidery unit is controlled by the processor C to draw the upper 4 and under 3 thread out during the cutting procedure, is then depending on the actual position of the needle in relation to the embroidery frame 20. The maximum thread length L that can be drawn by use of the embroidery unit is thus the maximum possible displacement that can be performed by controlling the embroidery unit to displace the embroidery frame 20 to the most remote point away from the actual position of the needle when the cut is initiated. As an example, if a rectangular embroidery frame 20 having a diagonal length k is used for clamping the fabric, the maximum extra thread length L=2k occurs if the actual position of the needle, when a cut is initiated according to the invention, is at the very corner of the rectangular embroidery frame 20 and the embroidery frame is controlled by the embroidery unit to be displaced the diagonal distance k in such a way that the needle will be positioned at the farthest corner diagonally across the rectangular embroidery frame 20. If other than rectangular shapes of an embroidery frame 20 are used, the maximum extra thread length L is easily found in a corresponding way.
The thread cut system able to provide arbitrary thread length consumption within the interval (d, d+L) uses the same mechanical parts as the current thread cut system. The variably consumed thread length in a cut is obtained by changing the software control of the system and by using the thread feed system and the embroidery unit to feed (using the thread feeder 15) respectively pull (using the embroidery unit) a predetermined amount of thread. The control of the system able to provide a variable thread length consumed in the cut is shown in
C The additional steps, in relation to the prior art thread cut (in
When a cut with a predetermined thread length consumption, as described above, shall be performed, the fabric 2 must be mounted in a hoop of some kind connected to an embroidery unit. This implies that the system can not be used in sewing mode when a conventional fabric feeder transports the fabric.
The thread cut described above admits arbitrary variable thread consumption within an interval being restricted only by the fabric clamping member (20) and the actual position of the needle in relation to said fabric clamping member (20). The extra length x/2 of the thread both over and under the fabric 2 will be of the same size. Normally it is desirable to change the length of the threads under the fabric only. However, in the prior art thread cut systems (with a fixed cut length d) the thread on the upper side of the fabric is sometimes too short after a cut. This part of the thread goes through the eye of the needle 5 and if it is too short there is a risk that the thread is pulled out of the eye of the needle when the sewing machine is started. The thread cut with a variable thread length x consumption as described here can be used to solve this problem. On the other hand, the upper thread is sometimes in prior art machines pulled down after a cut (and before the sewing starts again), (see further in [D2]). The prior art upper thread pull down algorithm requires a certain amount of thread out of the eye of the needle. If this length of thread is too long, it may risk the function of the upper thread pull down sequence. However, it may be possible to take this in consideration by pulling some thread back again, after the cut has been performed, utilizing the upper thread feeder (15).
With reference to
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/SE2008/051094 | 9/29/2008 | WO | 00 | 12/18/2010 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2009/061258 | 5/14/2009 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
286662 | Wendell | Oct 1883 | A |
590726 | Merrick | Sep 1897 | A |
3550544 | Fairfield et al. | Dec 1970 | A |
3570426 | Kunes | Mar 1971 | A |
3585950 | Ito | Jun 1971 | A |
3589320 | Beazley | Jun 1971 | A |
3592153 | Margereson | Jul 1971 | A |
3613608 | Hinerfeld et al. | Oct 1971 | A |
3613610 | Hinerfeld et al. | Oct 1971 | A |
3693561 | Hrinko, Jr. et al. | Sep 1972 | A |
3698334 | Kleinschmidt et al. | Oct 1972 | A |
3712254 | Beamish et al. | Jan 1973 | A |
3721204 | Schaffer et al. | Mar 1973 | A |
3727567 | Beazley | Apr 1973 | A |
3763805 | Weigert | Oct 1973 | A |
3799087 | Beamish et al. | Mar 1974 | A |
3815531 | Wurst et al. | Jun 1974 | A |
3818849 | Maddox, Jr. | Jun 1974 | A |
3904890 | Wenrich et al. | Sep 1975 | A |
3967566 | Spiegel et al. | Jul 1976 | A |
4051794 | Herzer et al. | Oct 1977 | A |
4073247 | Cunningham et al. | Feb 1978 | A |
4092937 | Landau, Jr. et al. | Jun 1978 | A |
4098208 | Hedegaard | Jul 1978 | A |
4100865 | Landau, Jr. et al. | Jul 1978 | A |
4104976 | Landau, Jr. et al. | Aug 1978 | A |
4108090 | Landau, Jr. et al. | Aug 1978 | A |
4116145 | Nicolay | Sep 1978 | A |
4133275 | Herzer et al. | Jan 1979 | A |
4154179 | Arnold | May 1979 | A |
4160422 | Barber et al. | Jul 1979 | A |
4181085 | Conner, Jr. | Jan 1980 | A |
4185575 | Brown et al. | Jan 1980 | A |
4195582 | Novick et al. | Apr 1980 | A |
4214540 | Cook | Jul 1980 | A |
4221176 | Besore et al. | Sep 1980 | A |
4246858 | Ogawa | Jan 1981 | A |
4324191 | Brown | Apr 1982 | A |
4351254 | Brown | Sep 1982 | A |
4352334 | Childs et al. | Oct 1982 | A |
4359008 | Newman | Nov 1982 | A |
4365565 | Kawai et al. | Dec 1982 | A |
4373458 | Dorosz et al. | Feb 1983 | A |
4373459 | Dunn et al. | Feb 1983 | A |
4391215 | Sansone | Jul 1983 | A |
4393343 | Angersbach et al. | Jul 1983 | A |
4409914 | Sansone | Oct 1983 | A |
4412498 | Scholl | Nov 1983 | A |
4414909 | Bray | Nov 1983 | A |
4426947 | Marshall | Jan 1984 | A |
4457246 | Hanyu et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
4467739 | Hager et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
4479448 | Jones et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
4502400 | Walther | Mar 1985 | A |
4503794 | Ishihara et al. | Mar 1985 | A |
4507596 | Angersbach et al. | Mar 1985 | A |
4509443 | Martell et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4513676 | Martell et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4519331 | Kosrow et al. | May 1985 | A |
4526114 | Martell et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4526116 | Ma/ nnel | Jul 1985 | A |
4555997 | Tancs | Dec 1985 | A |
4557207 | Turner et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4563964 | Sjodin | Jan 1986 | A |
4569297 | Dusch | Feb 1986 | A |
4622907 | Kimura | Nov 1986 | A |
4648337 | Mall | Mar 1987 | A |
4677926 | Dusch et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4682554 | Goto et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4686917 | Braun | Aug 1987 | A |
4706584 | Senda et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4706587 | Shiomi | Nov 1987 | A |
4726307 | Yamauchi | Feb 1988 | A |
4726309 | Popp | Feb 1988 | A |
4742786 | Hashimoto et al. | May 1988 | A |
4748920 | Stutznacker | Jun 1988 | A |
4757773 | Nomura et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4781130 | Badowski | Nov 1988 | A |
4794875 | Noguchi et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4803937 | Hiramatsu et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4815406 | Brown et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4834008 | Sadeh et al. | May 1989 | A |
4841891 | Hashimoto et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4849902 | Yokoe et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4860678 | Skogward | Aug 1989 | A |
4867082 | Sabbioni et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4867087 | Suzuki et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4932343 | Mardix et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4982677 | Nomura et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
4995328 | Tanaka | Feb 1991 | A |
5000105 | Tanaka | Mar 1991 | A |
5012752 | Murata et al. | May 1991 | A |
5018466 | Hasegawa | May 1991 | A |
5095835 | Jernigan et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5138962 | Klundt | Aug 1992 | A |
5146862 | Sato et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5156106 | Suzuki et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5156107 | Kyuno et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5184560 | Asano | Feb 1993 | A |
5270939 | Goldberg et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5303665 | Hausammann | Apr 1994 | A |
5319565 | Hausammann et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5323722 | Goto et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5347940 | Hori et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5389868 | Mikami et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5410976 | Matsubara | May 1995 | A |
5474005 | Yamauchi et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5477795 | Nakayama et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5481995 | Hiratsuka et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5537939 | Horton | Jul 1996 | A |
5537946 | Sadeh et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5562059 | Yamauchi et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5571240 | Yamauchi et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5588383 | Davis et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5592891 | Muto | Jan 1997 | A |
5603272 | Takahashi et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5653186 | Yamauchi et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5701830 | Muto | Dec 1997 | A |
5740055 | Iwata | Apr 1998 | A |
5755240 | Schonborn | May 1998 | A |
5791270 | Mori | Aug 1998 | A |
5911182 | Uyama et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5924372 | Okuda et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5974997 | Amburgey | Nov 1999 | A |
6032595 | Okuyama | Mar 2000 | A |
6131526 | Iida et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6135038 | Okamoto | Oct 2000 | A |
6202001 | Muto | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6209468 | Marcangelo et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6293210 | Freeman et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6321670 | Tomita et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6381818 | Freeman et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6718895 | Fortuna | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6729255 | Ton et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6732668 | Zesch et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6736077 | Pokrishevsky et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6823807 | Zesch et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6871605 | Zesch et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6883446 | Koerner | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6883449 | Burrell et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6963790 | Mizuno et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6983192 | Block et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7210417 | Koerner | May 2007 | B2 |
7212880 | Mizuno et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7225747 | Friman et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7240628 | Friman et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7308333 | Kern et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7412936 | Price et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7460925 | Noguchi | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7793602 | Koemer | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7814832 | Franz | Oct 2010 | B2 |
8261679 | Ihira et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8387547 | Bardh et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
20020043202 | Freeman et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20030140829 | Zesch et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030140830 | Pokrishevsky et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030140831 | Zesch et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030140832 | Ton et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040210336 | Block et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050016428 | Koerner | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20060064195 | Kern et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060213413 | Koerner | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070204781 | Noguchi | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070256619 | Koemer | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070272135 | Fujihara | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20100224111 | Ihira et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110005441 | Roche | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110041746 | Eklund et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110146553 | Wilhelmsson et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110168070 | Lanquist | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110303138 | Flygare et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120060733 | Maki et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120060734 | Yamanashi et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120234222 | Naka | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130014682 | Brindzik | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130042797 | Bondesson et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1081544 | Jul 1980 | CA |
2515406 | Aug 2004 | CA |
102007001073 | Aug 2007 | DE |
39680 | Nov 1981 | EP |
77788 | May 1983 | EP |
103364 | Mar 1984 | EP |
117713 | Sep 1984 | EP |
124211 | Nov 1984 | EP |
366140 | May 1990 | EP |
515131 | Nov 1992 | EP |
564771 | Oct 1993 | EP |
857228 | Aug 1998 | EP |
1184502 | Mar 2002 | EP |
1777331 | Apr 2007 | EP |
2226419 | Sep 2010 | EP |
191124452 | Jan 1912 | GB |
1179964 | Feb 1970 | GB |
1179965 | Feb 1970 | GB |
1182563 | Feb 1970 | GB |
1200024 | Jul 1970 | GB |
1282153 | Jul 1972 | GB |
1310091 | Mar 1973 | GB |
1315001 | Apr 1973 | GB |
1320764 | Jun 1973 | GB |
1320765 | Jun 1973 | GB |
1349994 | Apr 1974 | GB |
1375540 | Nov 1974 | GB |
1393294 | May 1975 | GB |
1440350 | Jun 1976 | GB |
1475791 | Jun 1977 | GB |
1526209 | Sep 1978 | GB |
1547931 | Jul 1979 | GB |
1547932 | Jul 1979 | GB |
1547933 | Jul 1979 | GB |
1547934 | Jul 1979 | GB |
2028388 | Mar 1980 | GB |
1568486 | May 1980 | GB |
1570241 | Jun 1980 | GB |
1570242 | Jun 1980 | GB |
1570243 | Jun 1980 | GB |
1570244 | Jun 1980 | GB |
1570245 | Jun 1980 | GB |
1571736 | Jul 1980 | GB |
2043124 | Oct 1980 | GB |
1583629 | Jan 1981 | GB |
2157723 | Oct 1985 | GB |
2168085 | Jun 1986 | GB |
2177520 | Jan 1987 | GB |
2204604 | Nov 1988 | GB |
1212591 | Aug 1989 | JP |
02055080 | Feb 1990 | JP |
2000167277 | Jun 2000 | JP |
2000342869 | Dec 2000 | JP |
6304359 | Jul 2007 | JP |
2009011594 | Jan 2009 | JP |
2009233435 | Oct 2009 | JP |
2010185151 | Aug 2010 | JP |
198800714 | Apr 1988 | KR |
8101020 | Apr 1981 | WO |
8203879 | Nov 1982 | WO |
8901067 | Feb 1989 | WO |
9715708 | May 1997 | WO |
0104405 | Jan 2001 | WO |
2004072349 | Aug 2004 | WO |
2006071786 | Jul 2006 | WO |
2007143062 | Dec 2007 | WO |
2010144013 | Dec 2010 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110094426 A1 | Apr 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60996306 | Nov 2007 | US |