This invention relates to load indicating fasteners that are “thread-forming” (also referred to as “thread-rolling” or “self-tapping” fasteners), methods for making load indicating thread-forming fasteners, and methods for measuring the load in thread-forming fasteners.
Thread-forming fasteners are well known in many industries, such as in high-volume automotive assembly. Examples of such fasteners are described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,242,253 (Fulmer), issued Sep. 7, 1993, for example. Such fasteners are also marketed commercially, for example, by Reminc, Research Engineering and Manufacturing Inc., Middletown, R.I., USA, under the trademark “Taptite” and “Taptite 2000”, and a description of such fasteners can be found in their product literature, entitled “Taptite 2000 Thread Rolling Fasteners”.
The major advantage of thread-forming fasteners is that they can be installed directly into a drilled hole, eliminating the cost of tapping the hole. Additionally, the thread formed by a thread-forming fastener has very tight tolerance since it is formed by the fastener itself and therefore forms a better nut.
Although thread-forming fasteners have been used in numerous applications in the automotive and aerospace industries to reduce cost, such fasteners are generally restricted to non-critical or less-critical applications. The difficulty in controlling the tightening process prevents their use in critical applications.
The primary reason for this is that the thread-forming process requires torque, in addition to the tightening torque, and this thread-forming torque varies significantly with hole tolerance, material, friction conditions, etc. As a result, the precise tightening of a thread-forming fastener to a specified torque into a blind hole, where the thread is still being formed as the bolt is being tightened, will result in a 3 sigma load scatter of typically +/−50%, which is unacceptable in critical applications.
For some time, ultrasonics has been used to accurately measure the load in bolts. Initially, removable ultrasonic devices were the most commonly used. More recently, low-cost permanent ultrasonic transducers, which can be permanently attached to one end of the fastener, have come to be used. Permanent fasteners of this type are described, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 4,846,001 (Kibblewhite), issued Jul. 11, 1989, U.S. Pat. No. 5,131,276 (Kibblewhite), issued Jul. 21, 1992, U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/264,877 (Kibblewhite), filed Jan. 29, 2001, and International Application No. PCT/US02/03920 (Kibblewhite), filed May 17, 2002, the subject matter of which is incorporated by reference herein.
In accordance with the present invention, it has been determined that such ultrasonics can be mated with an otherwise conventional thread-forming fastener to provide a load indicating thread-forming fastener that can be used for precise and reliable assembly of critical bolted joints, such as those in automobile engines (e.g., cylinder heads, connecting rods, main bearings, etc.), drive trains, steering, brakes, suspensions, and a variety of other applications, including aerospace applications.
Steps can then be taken, using equipment and methods that are otherwise known and conventional, to accurately measure and control the load in the thread-forming fastener during tightening, and to inspect the load in the thread-forming fastener after assembly.
For further detail regarding preferred embodiments for implementing the improvements of the present invention, reference is made to the description which is provided below, together with the following illustrations.
In the illustrative embodiment of
As an example, the transducer 14 can be implemented using a thin piezoelectric polymer sensor (e.g., a 9 micron thick, polyvinylidene fluoride copolymer film, of the type manufactured by Measurement Specialties Inc., Valley Forge, Pa.) permanently, mechanically and acoustically attached to an end surface 22 of the fastener 12. The top electrode of the transducer 14 can be implemented as a thin metallic foil (e.g., an approximately 50 micron thick, type 316, full-hard, dull or matte finished stainless steel) which has been treated to provide a black oxide finish, which is then preferably provided with a black oxide treatment to provide an extremely thin, durable, corrosion resistant and electrically conductive, black coating. A high-resolution bar code can then be marked on this surface by removing selected areas of the coating (e.g., by conventional laser ablation techniques) to provide a high contrast mark easily read with conventional, commercially available optical readers.
It is again to be understood that such implementations are described only for purposes of illustration, and that any of a variety of transducer configurations can be used to implement the transducer 14 applied to the fastener 12, as desired. For example, the ultrasonic transducer 14 can be implemented as an oriented piezoelectric thin film, vapor deposited directly on the head of the fastener 12, as is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,131,276 (Kibblewhite), issued Jul. 21, 1992. As a further alternative, the ultrasonic transducer 14 can be implemented as a piezoelectric polymer film, chemically grafted on the head of the fastener 12, as is described in U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/264,877 (Kibblewhite), filed Jan. 29, 2001, and International Application No. PCT/US02/03920 (Kibblewhite), filed May 17, 2002. It will be readily understood that other alternative implementations are also possible.
In the embodiment illustrated in
In an alternative embodiment, an essentially flat surface is provided on the head 16 of the thread-forming fastener 12 and a removable ultrasonic transducer is temporarily attached to the fastener for the purpose of making load measurements. The threaded end of the fastener 12 is identical to the previous embodiment with the permanent ultrasonic transducer.
In practice, heat is generated as a result of the thread-forming work that takes place during the thread-forming run-down stage of the installation of a thread-forming fastener. This results in a slight increase in temperature in both the fastener (the bolt) and the resulting joint. This increase in temperature can cause errors in the ultrasonic load measurements to be taken because of thermal expansion effects. For this reason, when using ultrasonics for inspecting the load in a fastener, it is usual to measure the temperature of the fastener or the joint in order to compensate for the effects of thermal expansion.
However, in conjunction with a thread-forming fastener, the average temperature increase due to the heat generated during thread-formation can not be measured directly during the installation process and is subject to variations in material, friction, and heat conduction properties of the joint components. Without compensation, this thermal effect can result in inaccuracies of load measurement on the order of 5% to 20%, depending on the bolt, the joint and the assembly process being used.
Further in accordance with the present invention, more accurate load measurements in the thread-forming load indicating fasteners are provided by eliminating the effects of fastener heating resulting from the thread-forming process. This is achieved by measuring the load (or acoustic time-of-flight) value immediately prior to the load-inducing stage of the assembly process, and by using this measured value as the zero-load reading.
The load-inducing stage of the assembly process can be detected by any one of a variety of methods. For example, an increase in load above a predetermined threshold, a change in the increase in load with time, angle of rotation of the fastener or torque, an increase in torque above a predetermined threshold, or a change in the increase in torque with time, angle or load can be detected. Irrespective of the method used to detect the load-inducing stage of the assembly process, a new zero-load base measurement is taken as a value just prior to the load-inducing assembly stage by selecting or calculating a load measurement prior to the load-inducing stage. This can be achieved by selecting a load measurement corresponding to a fixed time or angle prior to the detection of the commencement of the load-inducing stage, for example. Alternatively, for through-hole applications, the end of the thread-forming phase can be detected by a reduction in torque. It is again to be understood that such methods are only illustrative, and that there are numerous other methods for determining the new zero-load base measurement prior to tightening, from load, time, torque and angle of rotation measurements recorded during assembly operations with hand and powered assembly tools.
The thermal effect of thread forming causes an apparent positive load value at zero load just prior to tightening. An alternative to zeroing the load (or time-of-flight measurement) is to add this load offset, measured prior to the load-inducing stage of the assembly process, to the target load (or target time-of-flight). The result is the same since the increase in measured load is the same.
Yet another alternative is to experimentally determine an average value of load error due to the thread forming and adjust the zero-load measurement or target tightening parameter to compensate for this effect using one of the above-described methods. This approach, however, does not compensate for variations with individual fasteners or joint components and is therefore presently considered less desirable.
The result is that, for the first time, ultrasonic load measurement technology can be used with thread-forming fasteners. Errors in load measurement resulting from the thermal effects of thread-forming can be compensated. This then results in accurate load measurement and tightening control of the thread-forming fasteners.
The above-described method of eliminating the effects of fastener heating resulting from the thread-forming process can also be used with other fastener assembly processes that generate heat prior to the load-inducing tightening stage. Thread-locking bolts and nuts, for example, are manufactured with a prevailing “locking” torque to prevent the fastener from loosening during service. Most often, the thread of either the bolt or nut has an irregular profile causing the threads to elastically deform slightly upon mating. Alternatively, the bolt or nut has an insert or patch of a soft material to provide the prevailing torque or resistance to loosening. The prevailing torque provided by these thread-locking features produces heating of the fastener during rundown in the same manner as the tapping torque does with a thread-forming fastener. Consequently, the above-described method for compensating for thermal-related errors in accordance with the present invention can be used with prevailing torque-locking fasteners to improve the accuracy of ultrasonic load measurement during assembly.
It will be understood that various changes in the details, materials and arrangement of parts which have been herein described and illustrated in order to explain the nature of this invention may be made by those skilled in the art within the principle and scope of the invention as expressed in the following claims.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/412,125, filed Sep. 19, 2002. This application is also a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/470,372, which has an assigned filing date of Jul. 25, 2003, which was the National Stage of International Application No. PCT/US02/03920, filed Jan. 28, 2002, and which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/264,877, filed Jan. 29, 2001.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US03/29302 | 9/19/2003 | WO | 00 | 10/26/2005 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2004/027271 | 4/1/2004 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1909476 | Trotter | May 1933 | A |
2413797 | Stone | Jan 1947 | A |
3181672 | Swanson | May 1965 | A |
3774479 | Lesner | Nov 1973 | A |
3969810 | Pagano | Jul 1976 | A |
3969960 | Pagano | Jul 1976 | A |
4006784 | Dudek | Feb 1977 | A |
4008772 | Boys | Feb 1977 | A |
4043222 | Dudek | Aug 1977 | A |
4074772 | Jonsson | Feb 1978 | A |
4104778 | Vliet | Aug 1978 | A |
4281538 | Dudek | Aug 1981 | A |
4281987 | Kleesattel | Aug 1981 | A |
4294122 | Couchman | Oct 1981 | A |
4295377 | Couchman | Oct 1981 | A |
4305471 | Eshghy | Dec 1981 | A |
4316512 | Kibblewhite et al. | Feb 1982 | A |
4333351 | Bickford | Jun 1982 | A |
4344138 | Frasier | Aug 1982 | A |
4471657 | Voris et al. | Sep 1984 | A |
4569229 | de Halleux | Feb 1986 | A |
4602511 | Holt | Jul 1986 | A |
4649753 | Goodsmith | Mar 1987 | A |
4846001 | Kibblewhite | Jul 1989 | A |
4899591 | Kibblewhite | Feb 1990 | A |
4977898 | Schwarzschild et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
5018988 | Kibblewhite et al. | May 1991 | A |
5029480 | Kibblewhite | Jul 1991 | A |
5042015 | Stringer | Aug 1991 | A |
5092175 | Winckler et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5131276 | Kibblewhite | Jul 1992 | A |
5150714 | Green | Sep 1992 | A |
5165831 | Yager et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5170277 | Bard et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5211061 | Goodwin | May 1993 | A |
5216622 | Kibblewhite et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5220839 | Kibblewhite | Jun 1993 | A |
5242253 | Fulmer | Sep 1993 | A |
5291789 | Walton | Mar 1994 | A |
5303585 | Lichte | Apr 1994 | A |
5343785 | Holt et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5366026 | Maruyama et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5437525 | Bras | Aug 1995 | A |
5439063 | Anders et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5726349 | Palmertree et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5807048 | d'Agraives et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5970798 | Gleman et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6009380 | Vecchio et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6053906 | Honda et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6078874 | Piety et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6103072 | Nishiwaki et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6142023 | Cole et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6167758 | Fomitchev | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6186010 | Eguchi et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6239737 | Black | May 2001 | B1 |
6268796 | Gnadinger et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6338716 | Hossack et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6340868 | Lys et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6341271 | Salvo et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6502463 | Clark et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6598900 | Stanley et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6633821 | Jackson et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6671185 | Duval | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6712570 | Kersten | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6726960 | Sanduja et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6843628 | Hoffmeister et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6990866 | Kibblewhite | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7614303 | McInerney et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7644627 | Kibblewhite et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7650792 | Kibblewhite | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7823458 | Kibblewhite et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
20010014262 | Friederich et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20020044063 | Blagin et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20030173098 | Miner et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040045729 | Lehnert et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040050567 | Tambini | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040065154 | Kibblewhite | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20050161241 | Frauhammer et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20060004290 | Smith et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060102367 | Etter et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060157262 | Chen | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20070151740 | Friberg et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20090038402 | Kibblewhite et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090055028 | Kibblewhite et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090188536 | Ho | Jul 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3327964 | Feb 1985 | DE |
19917222 | Nov 2000 | DE |
0535919 | Apr 1993 | EP |
0 541 476 | May 1993 | EP |
04-166732 | Jun 1992 | JP |
10-086074 | Apr 1998 | JP |
02-002239939 | Aug 2002 | JP |
WO 63565 | Oct 2000 | WO |
WO 02061292 | Aug 2002 | WO |
WO 02061292 | Aug 2003 | WO |
WO 2004027271 | Apr 2004 | WO |
WO2005063448 | Jul 2005 | WO |
WO 2007139834 | Dec 2007 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060144157 A1 | Jul 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60412125 | Sep 2002 | US |