The present invention relates to a threadless cap for closing a liquid bottle, such as a water bottle for a water dispenser.
A potable liquid bottle, such as a water bottle for a water cooler or similar dispenser, is usually provided with a cap to close and seal a discharge opening on a neck of the bottle during storage, transportation, and manipulation of the bottle. Of course, other than water, the potable liquid contained in the bottle can also be juice, soft drink, or any other type of drinkable liquid.
The cap prevents inadvertent spilling of liquid from the bottle and contamination of the liquid by exposure to the environment. The cap also ensures that hygienic conditions exist on surfaces of the neck of the bottle and around the discharge opening on which liquid flowing out of the bottle will come into direct contact with. Typically, the cap is made of a polymer material and includes a tension ring or the like that provides a radial force for retaining the cap on the neck of the bottle. The cap also generally includes a line of weakness that facilitates tearing or rupturing of the cap material by a manual pull when the cap is to be removed from the bottle.
To adequately seal the bottle, the cap may have a nonintegral resilient seal which engages the upper edge of the bottle neck and thus seals the discharge opening. By “nonintegral” is meant a resilient seal that is distinct from the remainder of the cap and mounted to the cap to perform the sealing function. The nonintegral resilient seal can be formed directly on the cap by laying a bead of polymer material which becomes resilient when it sets.
The manufacturing of such a nonintegral seal faces a number of challenges. On one hand, there is the need to reduce as much as possible the amount of polymer material used to form the resilient seal in order to lower the cost of production of the cap. At the same time, when less polymer material is used, the integrity of the resilient seal may be compromised. This is particularly important when the threadless cap is used to close large water bottles that are made of plastic material, where significant dimensional variations can exist between different brands or models of bottles in the area of the bottle neck. For such applications, it is important to provide caps with good sealing ability capable to accommodate bottles with significant dimensional variations.
Accordingly, there is a clear need in the industry to provide an improved threadless cap for closing a liquid bottle that uses a nonintegral cap and that provides an effective sealing function.
According to a first broad aspect, the invention provides a threadless cap for closing a liquid bottle, the liquid bottle having a neck with an upper edge defining a discharge opening. The threadless cap comprises a lid for overlying the upper edge, the lid including a surface for facing the upper edge and a projection extending from the surface toward the upper edge. The threadless cap also comprises a skirt depending from the lid. The threadless cap further comprises a seal member on the surface for establishing a sealing engagement with the upper edge. The seal member includes an arcuate bead of resilient material located on the surface in a position to register with at least a portion of the upper edge. The projection engages and extends along the arcuate bead of resilient material.
According to a second broad aspect, the invention provides a blank for a threadless cap, the threadless cap for use in closing a liquid bottle, the liquid bottle having a neck with an upper edge defining a discharge opening. The blank comprises a lid for overlying the upper edge and a skirt depending from the lid. The lid includes a surface for facing the upper edge and a channel on the surface for receiving an arcuate bead of polymer material capable of setting to form a resilient seal member. The channel is located on the surface in a position to register with at least a portion of the upper edge. The channel includes a projection extending from the surface toward the upper edge, the projection defining a barrier to prevent the polymer material deposited in the channel from flowing laterally out of the channel.
According to a third broad aspect, the invention provides a method for manufacturing a threadless cap for closing a liquid bottle having a neck with an upper edge defining a discharge opening. The method comprises providing a threadless cap blank including a lid for overlying the upper edge, the lid including an arcuate channel located on the lid in a position to face the upper edge and register with at least a portion of the upper edge. The method also comprises flowing in the channel a bead of polymer material, the polymer material when setting forming a resilient seal member suitable for sealingly engaging the upper edge. The channel constrains the polymer material to flow along a length of the channel and impedes the polymer material from flowing laterally out of the channel.
According to a fourth broad aspect, the invention provides method for manufacturing a threadless cap for a liquid bottle that has a neck with an upper edge defining a discharge opening. The method comprises molding a blank having a lid for overlying the upper edge. The method also comprises depositing on a sealing face of the lid a ring-shaped bead of polymer material, the polymer material, when set, forming a resilient seal member suitable for sealingly engaging the upper edge. The method further comprises constraining laterally the bead of polymer material to impede the polymer material from flowing in a radial direction with relation to the ring-shaped bead.
These and other aspects and features of the invention will now become apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art upon review of the following description of certain embodiments of the invention in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
A detailed description of certain examples of implementation of the present invention is provided below with reference to the following drawings in which:
In the drawings, embodiments of the invention are illustrated by way of example. It is to be expressly understood that the description and drawings are only for purposes of illustration and are an aid to understanding. They are not intended to be a definition of the limits of the invention.
As can be seen in
Referring to
The lid 22 includes a tension ring 26 for retaining the cap 10 on the neck 18 of the bottle 12. Upon positioning the cap 10 on the neck of the bottle 12, the tension ring 26 provides a radial force that causes the cap 10 to be retained on the neck 18. The tension ring 26 has an inwardly extending rib 28 for engaging the neck 18 of the bottle 12. The rib 28 is an internal projection or protrusion. In the non-limiting example of implementation shown, the rib 28 is in the form of a continuous projection extending along a substantial portion of the perimeter of the lid 22. In other embodiments, the rib 28 can be segmented, that is, the rib 28 can be formed of individual segments disposed along the periphery of the lid 22 rather than a continuous structure. Also, in this specific example of implementation, the tension ring 26 extends over substantially the entire periphery of the lid 22, although it is to be understood that the tension ring 26 can also be designed to extend along only a limited portion of the periphery of the lid 22. As well, while the lid 22 shown in
In
The skirt 24 depends from the lid 22 and surrounds the neck 18 of the bottle 12 when the cap 10 is installed thereon. In the particular embodiment shown, the skirt 24 has a lower edge 33 and is dimensioned such that when the cap 10 sealingly engages the upper edge of the neck 18, the lower edge 33 of the skirt 24 is at the level of or below the lower end portion 23 of the annular recessed area 19 of the neck 18 of the bottle 12. This may assist in preventing tampering.
The skirt 24 includes a line of weakness 32 facilitating a manual tear of the skirt 24. The line of weakness 32 is a line along which the skirt material is likely to tear or rupture when the skirt 24 is pulled. In the non-limiting example of implementation shown in
In addition, in the non-limiting embodiment shown, the skirt 24 defines a pull tab 34 for facilitating a manual tear of the skirt material along the line of weakness 32 when the cap 10 is removed from the bottle 12. The pull tab 34 projects down and depending on its size may extend down past the lower end portion 23 of the annular recessed area 19.
In the particular example of implementation shown in
In order to remove the cap 10 from the neck of the bottle, the user first grasps the pull tab 34. By applying sufficient pulling force on the pull tab 34, the skirt 24 will start tearing from the remainder of the cap 10 along the line of weakness 32. As the pulling force is maintained on the skirt 24 the tear propagates along the tension ring 26 and as the tear reaches the portion 38 it extends through the tension ring 26, thus rupturing the tension ring 26. At this point the tear stops propagating since the tear stop 36 is reached. When the tear stop 36 has been reached, the skirt 24 is still attached to the remainder of the cap 10 since, as indicated earlier, the line of weakness 32 extends around the cap 10 over an angular distance that is less than 360 degrees. It suffices then for the user to pull the skirt 24 up so as to remove the entire cap 10 from the neck of the bottle. This is easily feasible since the tension ring 26 has been ruptured and it applies only a relatively weak grip on the neck of the bottle.
It will thus be appreciated that the tension ring 26, the line of weakness 32, and the tear stop 36 facilitate the mounting, retention, and removal of the cap 10 on or from the neck 18 of the bottle 12. In particular, the tension ring 26 facilitates installation and ensures retention of the cap 10 on the neck 18 of the bottle 12. For their part, the line of weakness 32, the portion 38 of the line of weakness 32 and the tear stop 36 facilitate the removal of the cap 10 from the neck 18 of the bottle 12. The benefit of preventing a complete removal of the skirt 24 from the remainder of the cap 10 is two fold. First, the skirt 24 forms a convenient handle for the user to separate the cap 10 from the bottle neck. Hence, there is no need to use fingernails or tools to pry the cap off the bottle neck. Second, the cap always remains as one piece and it is thus easier to dispose in light of the fact that there is no complete separation of the skirt 24.
The structure of the resilient seal member 11 is best shown in
In this embodiment, the resilient material is selected to avoid affecting the liquid contained in the bottle 12 in a deleterious manner that may render the liquid unpleasant or harmful to a drinker of the liquid. For example, the resilient material may include a polymer material, which may be approved by a food regulatory authority and/or an environmental regulatory authority.
In this example of implementation, the resilient seal member 11 is constrained between two concentric and ring-shaped projections 15 and 17, defining between them a circular channel 21 that is centered on the lid 22. The projection 15 is circular and centered with respect to the lid 22. It is integrally formed with the lid 22. It has a height that is constant along its length and that is less than a height of the resilient seal member 11. By “height” of the ring-shaped projection 15 is meant the distance from the sealing surface 29 to the tip of the ring-shaped projection 15. In the example shown in
In this fashion, the ring-shaped projection 15 does not interfere the operation of the resilient seal member 11. The resilient seal member 11 can substantially compress against the upper edge 27 without causing the ring-shaped projection 15 to touch the upper edge 27 of the bottle 12.
In this embodiment, the ring-shaped projection 15 is continuous. In a possible variant, the ring-shaped projection 15 may be discontinuous, in other words, it may be made from a series of spaced apart segments.
The projection 17 is also ring-shaped and it is located in the shoulder area of the lid 22. The ring-shaped projection 17 points downwardly. It is also integrally formed with the lid 22. The height of the ring-shaped projection 17 is somewhat less or it is equal to the height of the resilient seal member 11. By “height” of the projection 17 is meant the distance between the sealing surface 29 and the tip of the ring-shaped projection 17. In the example shown in
As with the ring-shaped projection 15, in this embodiment, the ring-shaped projection 17 is continuous and has a constant height along its length. Alternatively, the ring-shaped projection 17 can be made discontinuous as a series of short segments spaced apart from one another.
In this embodiment, the lid 22 includes a plurality of protuberances 41 in the channel 21 defined by the ring-shaped projections 15 and 17. The protuberances 41 aid to retain the resilient seal member 11 in the channel 21.
As best seen in
A method for forming the resilient seal member 11 is best shown in
As the bead of resilient material is deposited in the channel 21, it is constrained laterally by the ring-shaped projections 15 and 17. In this fashion, the bead of resilient material may be able to flow to some extent lengthwise of the channel but a radial or lateral flow is impeded. This results in a resilient seal member that has an augmented height which is likely to provide a better seal, in particular, one that may accommodate different brands or models of bottles with different bottle neck dimensions. In addition, it is also possible to use with such arrangement a resilient material that has better flow characteristics, such as a resilient material that is less viscous, since the lateral spreading of the resilient material is impeded.
Although the above description related to a specific type of cap, it will be appreciated that the invention can also be applied to caps having other features. For instance, the invention can be applied to a cap which has a lid portion that is pierced when a bottle on which the cap is mounted is installed in a liquid dispenser. The invention can also be applied to caps having a central well as described, for instance, in U.S. Pat. No. 6,032,812. Examples of other threadless caps to which the present invention applies are described in the U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,904,259; 5,392,939; 5,370,270; 5,295,518; 4,991,635 and 4,699,188.
Although various embodiments have been illustrated, this was for the purpose of describing, but not limiting, the invention. Various modifications will become apparent to those skilled in the art and are within the scope of this invention, which is defined more particularly by the appended claims.
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/822,211 filed on Apr. 8, 2004 by Perrin et al. and hereby incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1197007 | Cullen et al. | Oct 1934 | A |
2213465 | Gay | Sep 1940 | A |
2811272 | Lawlor | Oct 1957 | A |
3392862 | Faulstich | Jul 1968 | A |
3840137 | Faulstich | Oct 1974 | A |
3866783 | Bullock et al. | Feb 1975 | A |
3940103 | Hilaire | Feb 1976 | A |
3974932 | Faulstich | Aug 1976 | A |
4106653 | Martinelli | Aug 1978 | A |
4162736 | Faulstich | Jul 1979 | A |
4166552 | Faulstich | Sep 1979 | A |
4239130 | Altadonna | Dec 1980 | A |
4243150 | Gunne et al. | Jan 1981 | A |
4267945 | Maynard, Jr. | May 1981 | A |
4577771 | Martinez | Mar 1986 | A |
4597423 | Chenot | Jul 1986 | A |
RE32354 | Savage | Feb 1987 | E |
4699188 | Baker et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4717051 | Leclere | Jan 1988 | A |
4784296 | Bullock | Nov 1988 | A |
4815617 | Cullum | Mar 1989 | A |
4834267 | Schroer et al. | May 1989 | A |
4846236 | Deruntz | Jul 1989 | A |
4911316 | Tackles | Mar 1990 | A |
4934546 | Markley | Jun 1990 | A |
4948009 | Sawatani | Aug 1990 | A |
5031676 | Ulm | Jul 1991 | A |
5121778 | Baker et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5222519 | Sato et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5222530 | Baker et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5224616 | Crisci | Jul 1993 | A |
5232125 | Adams | Aug 1993 | A |
5259534 | Lynd | Nov 1993 | A |
5273083 | Burrows | Dec 1993 | A |
5284188 | Baker et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5289854 | Baker et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5289855 | Baker et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5295518 | Baker et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5297599 | Bucheli | Mar 1994 | A |
5370270 | Adams et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5397023 | Toczek et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5513763 | Adams et al. | May 1996 | A |
5542555 | Hidding et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5687865 | Adams et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5687867 | Lamoureux | Nov 1997 | A |
5909827 | Bietzer et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
6032812 | Lamoureux | Mar 2000 | A |
6082567 | Bietzer et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6102226 | Verderber | Aug 2000 | A |
6177041 | Bietzer | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6237790 | Verderber | May 2001 | B1 |
6283331 | Lucas | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6338414 | Schellenbach | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6626310 | Taha | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6681947 | Kim et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
7007816 | Verderber | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7228980 | Morini | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7281636 | Kim et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7581653 | Perrin et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
20010037989 | Verderber | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020113032 | Blomdahl et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020195414 | Kim et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030094213 | Moon et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030150834 | Verderber | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040129667 | Nusbaum et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 291 969 | Nov 1991 | CA |
1 338 210 | Apr 1996 | CA |
1 338 339 | May 1996 | CA |
2 181 828 | Jan 2002 | CA |
2 442 213 | Oct 2002 | CA |
2 418 456 | Aug 2004 | CA |
0 918 731 | Jun 1997 | EP |
2 822 810 | Mar 2001 | FR |
1 104 638 | Mar 1966 | GB |
WO 9003919 | Apr 1990 | WO |
WO 9113813 | Sep 1991 | WO |
WO 9307084 | Apr 1993 | WO |
WO 9429215 | Dec 1994 | WO |
WO 9803426 | Jan 1998 | WO |
WO 0040474 | Jul 2000 | WO |
WO 02060808 | Aug 2002 | WO |
WO 02079046 | Oct 2002 | WO |
WO 2004071932 | Aug 2004 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070023383 A1 | Feb 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10822211 | Apr 2004 | US |
Child | 11440720 | US |