Not applicable
Not applicable
1. Field of the Invention
The purpose of this invention is providing a low-cost motion simulator to be used in homes and other venues. The invention can be adapted for children or adults.
The invention has a seat which moves in response to signals from a smart phone or smart tablet, hereinafter referred to as “computer tablet.” The nature of the motion is determined by application-specific software (an “app”) in the computer tablet. The computer tablet's display is used to display motion-related images. The seat can rotate about any axis. Pitch and roll are limited, but the range of each is sufficient for many simulations. Yaw is unlimited.
2. the Prior Art
Many motion simulators have been developed. A well-known early one was the Link Trainer, which had an analog control system and a mechanical arrangement based of pneumatic devices. There are many modern motion simulators using digital computers for control. Some are large and very expensive, so they are used only by such persons as professional aircraft pilots.
One marketed by Simcraft is small enough for nonprofessional use. It has a seat mounted on gimbals, so any rotation is possible. The control system is a conventional digital computer with application-specific software. There seem to be no patents for this device.
U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,490,784 and 6,629,896 describe large simulators with spherical moving platforms, supported by drive wheels which move the sphere by friction. These inventions are not suitable for home use.
In contrast, the present invention is small enough to be used in homes. Since it uses a computer tablet as the main control device, a family can purchase a basic physical unit, then use an already-owned computer tablet for the control. Thus the physical units can be sold inexpensively.
This invention relates generally to game seats with motion simulation, and motion simulators in general. Related information appears in the U.S. Pat. No. 8,939,455 and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/096,986, which describe the mechanical, electrical, control, and communication aspects of a base vehicle. The present invention is a stationary unit with a moving platform for a human rider, but it does use some electrical, control, and communication features that are similar to ones in those patents.
The invention comprises a base unit and a moving platform. See
The invention includes a fixed-position retainer plate 7 between the exterior and interior shells. See
Electrical signals from an electronics module (not shown in the figures) mounted on the base unit power the drive wheels and determine the direction and rotational speed of the wheels. The electronics module carries out some basic computations for control, but the motion plan is determined by a computer tablet in the moving platform. The computer tablet is mounted on a bracket that holds it in view of the human rider, so the computer tablet display becomes part of the simulation. The bracket is moved out of the way when a different display (e.g., a large, wall-mounted display) is used.
Control signals, mostly descriptions of required rotations, are sent from the computer tablet to the electronics module in the base unit through a bidirectional wireless link. That link also carries moving-platform position information from the electronics module to the computer tablet. Thus, there are no wires between the base unit and the moving platform; the invention does not need slip rings or other moving electrical connections.
The computer tablet touch screen can be used as a control for interactive simulations. Alter-natively, other controls—joystick, steering wheel, switches, etc.—can be used if they are linked to the computer tablet. Wireless links are preferred. One advantage of this arrangement is that controls can be switched easily, so each type of simulation can have a simulation-specific set of controls.
Under some conditions it might be useful to mount the invention on a steerable base unit with powered wheels, and to provide controls so the rider could drive the unit from place to place. It that case it might be appropriate to apply the concepts taught in U.S. Pat. No. 8,939,455 and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/096,986.
The figures use the following reference identifiers:
A fundamental mechanical element of this invention is the spherical surface of outer shell 1, the motion of which is driven by the wheels of two assemblies. Each such assembly comprises a single wheel, or a pair of wheels, frictionally contacting the spherical surface; associated motors; and a mounting arrangement. The mounting arrangement provides for the wheel axis direction to be changed, thereby changing the direction of motion of the sphere. Outer shell 1 supports the entire moving platform.
One unique feature of this invention is retainer plate 7, which is rigidly mounted on base plate 15 using mount 13. The retainer plate prevents tipping of outer shell 1, hence that of the moving platform. Mount 13 passes through a clearance opening, shown as edge 18, in outer shell 1. While the retainer plate and its mount limit the range of motion of the outer shell, a preferred arrangement will allow sufficient motion for the intended applications. For the configuration shown in
Shroud 17 encloses the movement mechanism. Base plate 15 rests on floor surface 16.
In the moving platform, inner shell 4, which separates the rider space from retainer plate 7, is attached to outer shell 1 by shell closure 38.
It is useful to have some mathematical notations for describing control of the drive wheels. To that end, identify each wheel assembly with a number 1 or 2, wheel assembly 1 being the first one encountered in moving from the support ball in a counterclockwise direction around the center of base plate 15 as seen from above, and wheel assembly 2 being the other one. In the following, k will denote either wheel number, and “sphere” will mean the sphere of the exterior surface of outer shell 1.
Let uk be the unit vector pointing from the center C of the sphere toward wheel assembly k. More specifically, uk points toward a point Pk called “wheel reference point k” defined as follows: if wheel assembly k has a single wheel, then Pk is the point at which the wheel contacts the spherical surface; if wheel assembly k has a pair of wheels, Pk is midway between the points at which the two wheels contact the spherical surface. See
The two vectors u1 and u2 and the center C determine a plane P. Let w denote the unit vector orthogonal to P and pointing in the direction of motion of a right-handed screw rotating about C from P1 to P2. In conventional vector notation, w=(u1×u2)/|u1×u2|, where × is the usual vector cross product, and the denominator is the length of u1×u2. Let vk=w×uk. Then uk, vk, and w are unit basis vectors for a right-handed coordinate system.
Let R1, and R2 be the rotation vectors associated with sphere rotation due to the drive wheels at P1, and P2, respectively. Since each of these is orthogonal to the corresponding uk, these can be expressed as follows:
R1=β1v1+γ1w, and
R2=β2v2+γ2w,
where β1, γ1, β2, and γ2 are numbers. The vectors γ1 w and γ2 w represent rotations in the plane P. In order that there be no conflict (i.e., jamming) between drive wheels at P1 and P2, these must be equal, so
R1=β1v1+γw, and
R2=β2v2+γw, (1)
where γ is the common value of γ1 and γ2.
The vector β1 v1 represents a rotation orthogonal to the plane P. That rotation must have P2 as a fixed point because drive-wheel friction will block non-zero motion there (unless the drive-wheel motion at that point is identical to that caused by the rotation β1 v1). The only way that this can be guaranteed is for the line through C and P2, the axis of this rotation, to be parallel to v1. The same argument can be applied to β2 v2, mutatis mutandis, of course.
Thus, P1 and P2 must be positioned so that u1 and u2 are orthogonal. This is the same as requiring that the lines from C to each of P1 and P2 be orthogonal, which is assumed henceforth.
The overall rotation, represented by the vector R, is a combination of R1 and R2. It is the sum of the orthogonal in-plane components and the out-of-plane component:
R=β1v1+β2v2+γw. (2)
The first step in controlling sphere motion is determining β1, β2, and γ from a given R. Then those values are used to set the direction and speed of the drive wheels. Since v1, v2, and w are mutually orthogonal, this is just a matter of computing vector dot products:
β1=v1·R,
β2=v2·R, and
γ=w·R. (3)
Drive wheel rotations Rw1 and Rw2 at P1 and R2, respectively, are
Rw1=−ρ(β1v1+γw), and
Rw2=−ρ(β2v2+γw), (4)
where ρ is the ratio of sphere radius to drive wheel radius, and the minus sign arises from the fact that wheel rotation is opposite to the corresponding sphere rotation.
The timed sequence of rotations generated by the computer tablet are sent through the wireless link to the electronics module in the base unit. That module receives the required rotations, and converts them to signals controlling the motors of the drive-wheel assemblies.
The electronics module also determines the position of the moving unit, for example using an optical or magnetic sensor and corresponding marks on or magnets in the outer shell, and sends the position information back to the computer tablet in the moving unit. Methods for doing this will be apparent to persons knowledgeable of the relevant art.
When the Alignment Control unit receives an Align command, it issues a Reset signal to the Alignment Timeout unit, thereby starting the time interval to the next timeout; then it begins issuing rotation pairs <R, θ>. The Select by Priority unit passes the <R, θ> pairs to the Compute β1, β2, γ unit, with commands from Alignment Control having priority over those from FIFO. The values of β1, β2, and γ are passed to the Wheel Motor Control, which generates signals to the motors of the drive-wheel assemblies.
The electronics module has a Position Sensing unit which supplies some information about the sphere position to the Alignment Unit and, through the wireless connection, to the Computer Tablet. In a preferred embodiment, a Position Sensor 31 on mount 32 (see
The Computer Tablet generates commands for whatever motion simulation is being done. A single installation of this invention can be used for such activities as aircraft flight simulation, auto driving simulation, space trip simulation, etc. Each kind of simulation has a corresponding app. The exact nature of such apps is not a part of this invention, but persons familiar with the relevant art would be able to develop apps for particular applications.
It will be apparent to persons familiar with the relevant art that a freely rotating ball can be replaced by a caster or a drive-wheel assembly.
Also, it will be apparent to persons familiar with the relevant art that a simulator can be constructed without a retainer plate 7. If that is done, the retainer plate mount 13 can be eliminated, and the clearance opening in the outer shell (represented by the opening's edge 18) can be closed. Moreover, the inner shell 4 and its support element 38 can be eliminated, and the seat mounting bracket 22 connected directly to outer shell 1. The disadvantage to this modified configuration is that there is nothing to prevent tipping of the moving platform. The advantages are that this is a less expensive configuration and it allows a greater range of pitch and roll motion.
This patent claims the benefit of U.S. provisional patent No. 61/946,685 filed on Feb. 28, 2014, which is herein incorporated by reference. U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS5,490,784February 1996CarmeinVirtual reality system with enhanced 434/55sensory apparatus6,629,896October 2003JonesNimble virtual reality capsule using 472/60rotatable drive assembly8,939,455January 2015TerryRide-on vehicle and game seat for infants180/19.1and young children14/096,986December 2014BattenChildren's ride-on vehicle with computer-tablet display and child supervision62/117,491February 2015BattenSelf-Pivoting Drive for Spherical-FormMotion Simulators www.simcraft.com Simcraft web page
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3135057 | Nelson et al. | Jun 1964 | A |
4856771 | Nelson et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4995603 | Reed | Feb 1991 | A |
5551920 | Ogden et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5911634 | Nidata et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61946685 | Feb 2014 | US |