1. Technical Field of the Invention
Implementations consistent with the principles of the invention generally relate to the field of battery technology, more specifically to three-dimensional energy storage systems and devices, such as batteries and capacitors, and methods of manufacturing thereof.
2. Background
Existing energy storage devices, such as batteries, fuel cells, and electrochemical capacitors, typically have two-dimensional laminar architectures (e.g., planar or spiral-wound laminates) with a surface area of each laminate being roughly equal to its geometrical footprint (ignoring porosity and surface roughness).
A lithium battery is a highly desirable energy source due to its high energy density, high power, and long shelf life. Examples of lithium batteries include non-aqueous batteries such as lithium-ion and lithium polymer batteries. A separator between positive and negative electrodes of a lithium battery constitutes an important component of the battery. Separators for conventional, planar lithium ion batteries are typically solid micro-porous polyolefin films that are assembled in a sheet form and rolled in the form of a cathode/separator! anode/separator stack. This stack is rolled tightly and inserted into a can, filled with electrolyte, and then sealed.
Three-dimensional batteries have been proposed in the literature as ways to improve battery capacity and active material utilization. It has been proposed that a three-dimensional architecture may be used to provide higher surface area and higher energy as compared to a two dimensional, laminar battery architecture. There is a benefit to making a three-dimensional energy storage device due to the increased amount of energy that may be obtained out of a small geometric area.
The following references may further help to illustrate the state of the art, and are therefore incorporated by reference as non-essential subject matter herein: Long et. al., “Three-Dimensional Battery Architectures,” Chemical Reviews, (2004), 104, 4463-4492; Chang Liu,
It would be desirable to make three-dimensional electrochemical energy devices that may provide significantly higher energy and power density, while addressing the above issues or other limitations in the art.
Various methods and apparatus relating to three-dimensional battery structures and methods of manufacturing them are disclosed and claimed. In certain embodiments, a three-dimensional battery comprises a battery enclosure, and a first structural layer within the battery enclosure, where the first structural layer has a first surface, and a first plurality of conductive protrusions extend from the first surface. A first plurality of electrodes is located within the battery enclosure, where the first plurality of electrodes includes a plurality of cathodes and a plurality of anodes, and wherein the first plurality of electrodes includes a second plurality of electrodes selected from the first plurality of electrodes, each of the second plurality of electrodes being in contact with the outer surface of one of said first plurality of conductive protrusions.
Other aspects and advantages of the present invention may be seen upon review of the figures, the detailed description, and the claims that follow.
Some embodiments of the invention are described with reference to the following figures.
Certain embodiments of the invention relate to the design of a three-dimensional lithium-ion battery. Existing energy storage devices, such as batteries, fuel cells, and electrochemical capacitors, typically have two-dimensional laminar architectures (e.g., planar or spiral-wound laminates) with a surface area of each laminate being roughly equal to its geometrical footprint (ignoring porosity and surface roughness). A three-dimensional energy storage device can be one in which an anode, a cathode, and/or a separator are non-laminar in nature. For example, if electrodes protrude sufficiently from a backplane to form a non-laminar active battery component, then the surface area for such a non-laminar component may be greater than twice the geometrical footprint of its backplane. In some instances, given mutually orthogonal X,Y,Z directions, a separation between two constant-Z backplanes should be at least greater than a spacing between electrodes in an X-Y plane, divided by the square root of two.
Some embodiments of the invention relate to the use of a backbone structure for the manufacture of three-dimensional energy storage devices, such as batteries, capacitors, and fuel cells. The backbone structure may be used for the purpose of providing mechanical stability, electrical connectivity, and increased surface area per unit geometrical area. By way of example, the backbone structure may be made in the shape of pillars by wire-bonding aluminum on a flat substrate, which may be subsequently coated with a cathode or anode material for the purpose of assembling a battery. Examples of backbone formation using various materials, shapes, and methodologies are presented herein, among other embodiments.
Three-dimensional energy storage devices may produce higher energy storage and retrieval per unit geometrical area than conventional devices. Three-dimensional energy storage devices may also provide a higher rate of energy retrieval than two-dimensional energy storage devices for a specific amount of energy stored, such as by minimizing or reducing transport distances for electron and ion transfer between an anode and a cathode. These devices may be more suitable for miniaturization and for applications where a geometrical area available for a device is limited and/or where energy density requirement is higher than what may be achieved with a laminar device.
Some embodiments of the invention include a mechanically stable, electrically conductive backbone structure that ends up being a part of the final assembled energy storage device. A backbone material typically does not take an active part in electrochemical reactions of the energy storage device, and may enhance mechanical and electrical robustness.
The backbone material may also act as a high surface area substrate for manufacturing the high surface area electrochemical device. Mechanical robustness may increase the lifetime of the device, since active materials that constitute the device are typically porous electrodes with relatively lower mechanical stability. Electrical conductivity may enhance or maintain a power density of the device (e.g., by decreasing resistivity) while also equalizing current distribution between electroactive species.
A backbone structure may be made in any shape that provides higher surface area relative to geometrical area, such as pillars, posts, plates, waves, circles, diamonds, spirals, staircase structures, and so forth. The backbone structure may be made out of any material that may be shaped, such as metals, semiconductors, organics, ceramics, and glasses. The backbone structure may serve to provide: (i) rigidity to active electrodes in an energy storage device, such as anodes and cathodes in a lithium ion battery; (ii) electrical connectivity to tall three-dimensional structures; and (iii) increased surface area per unit geometrical area. Desirable materials include semiconductor materials such as silicon and germanium. Carbon-based organic materials may also be used to form backbone structures for three-dimensional shaping. Metals, such as aluminum, copper, nickel, cobalt, titanium, and tungsten, may also be used for backbone structures.
In some embodiments, a backbone structure is made out of a metal, semiconductor, organic material, ceramic, or glass using a subtractive formation technique. These materials may be processed by reactively etching a substrate using a selective etch mask and a plasma etch process. Alternatively, or in conjunction, electrochemical etching, stamping, or electrical discharge machining may be used to selectively remove material preferentially in areas where these materials are not desired.
In other embodiments, a backbone structure is made out of a metal, semiconductor, organic, ceramic, or glass using an additive formation technique. These materials may be processed by making a sacrificial mold using a technique such as conventional lithography, and depositing a backbone material using techniques such as electrochemical deposition, electroless deposition, electrophoretic deposition, vacuum assisted filling, stencil assisted filling, and so forth. In certain cases, the backbone structure may be assembled directly using a wirebonding process. In other cases, the backbone structure may be made on a flat plate using conventional lithography and deposition techniques, and subsequently assembled by “pick and place” and soldering or gluing techniques.
In other embodiments, a backbone material may be shaped using printing techniques, such as three-dimensional printing and inkjet printing, to form a backbone structure using single or multiple layers of printing to obtain a desired shape and thickness. Alternatively, or in conjunction, the backbone material may be assembled in the form of layered sheets, with sacrificial layers deposited in between. After stacking of the sheets is substantially complete, a resulting structure is cut into pieces of a desired height, assembled together, and the sacrificial material is released to provide the backbone structure.
In the case of an electrically conductive backbone structure, an active material may be directly assembled on top of and around the backbone structure by various techniques, such as electrochemical deposition, electroless deposition, co-deposition in an organic or inorganic matrix, electrophoretic deposition, mechanical filling and compacting, and vacuum assisted flow deposition.
In case of an electrically non-conductive backbone structure, a conducting layer may be deposited by various techniques, such as electrochemical or electroless deposition, vapor assisted vacuum deposition such as Atomic Layer Deposition (ALD) and Chemical Vapor Deposition (CVD), sputter deposition, evaporation, and electrophoretic deposition. This conductive layer may be subsequently removed in order to remove an electrical connection between an anode and a cathode. This removal may be accomplished using techniques such as sputter etching, ion milling, and liftoff. In addition, techniques such as chemical dissolution may be used with standard techniques such as lithography to protect areas that do not need to be removed.
Some examples of three-dimensional architectures that are capable of use with certain embodiments of the present invention, and that have cathodes and anodes protruding from the same backplane, are shown in
The following example further explains concepts described with reference to
In some embodiments, the patterned substrate 40 is electrically conductive, in which case the resulting backbone structure is ready for further processing of active materials. In certain other embodiments, the backbone structure is electrically non-conductive. In this case, further processing by deposition of a conductive layer may be performed by various methods.
The following example further explains concepts described with reference to
In certain other embodiments of the invention, additive processes may be used to process a backbone structure of an energy storage device.
The following example further explains concepts described with reference to
Once a backbone structure is available, materials that are involved in electrochemical reactions, also called active materials, may be loaded onto the backbone structure. This may be done by several different methods. An anode backbone and a cathode backbone may be separate from each other, but each electrode may be electrically conductive by itself. This lends to electrochemical deposition techniques and electrophoretic deposition techniques as viable options for adding the active materials. For example, in the case of a lithium-ion battery, a cathode material, such as LiCoO2, LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4, Li(NixCoyAlz)O2, LiFePO4, or Li2MnO4 may be electrophoretically deposited onto a conductive substrate. Electrophoretic deposition may also be performed for V2O5 films. Cathode materials may also be co-deposited along with a polypyrrole matrix. In addition, certain cathode materials for lithium-ion batteries may be electrochemically deposited, such as molybdenum oxysulfides. In certain embodiments, cathode formation comprises electrophoretic deposition of LiCoO2 until a layer thickness between 1 micron and 300 microns is formed. In certain embodiments, the layer thickness is between 5 microns and 200 microns, and in certain embodiments, the layer thickness is between 10 microns and 150 microns. With regards to anode materials, electrochemical deposition may be used for plateable anode materials, such as tin, electrophoretic deposition may be used to assemble graphite, and an electrophoretic resist deposition followed by pyrolysis may form a carbon anode. Other suitable anode materials may include titanates, silicon, and aluminum. Similar layer thicknesses apply to anode formation as described above. Suitable separator materials may include polyethylenes, polypropylenes, TiO2, SiO2, Al2O3, and the like.
A class of materials that can be used as separators for aqueous and non-aqueous energy storage systems is spin-on dielectrics. A spin-on dielectric can be used as porous barriers between a cathode and an anode in a battery. Some examples are phosphosilicates. MSQ (Methyl-Silsesquioxane), SILK™, and so forth. Many of these materials can be spun on and subsequently cured to form a consistent porous film.
Another method that can be used for forming separators is electrophoretic deposition of separator materials. Electrophoretic deposition is typically a potential driven phenomenon where particles of non-conducting or poorly conducting materials are driven to either a cathode or an anode by an applied voltage. Thick films can be deposited by this technique. Also, the films can be tailored to different porosities by adding different amounts of sacrificial binders that can be co-deposited electrophoretically and subsequently driven off by temperature. Due to surface driven effects, the deposition is typically self-limiting. Therefore, a thickness and an available separator spacing can be optimized in order to get full coverage between the cathode and the anode. This process is schematically shown in
Yet another way to deposit separator materials is to use a liquid solution of polyolefins or any other material of interest that can be made into a liquefied form in temperatures less than about 100° C. An assembly can be immersed into a solution containing the liquefied material, and a vacuum is pulled into a top of a chamber in order to till up crevices with the liquefied material. Once the vacuum is sufficient, the solution can wick into the crevices and can displace air in the crevices. In addition, when the vacuum is released, any residual bubbles that are present can expand sufficiently so that they will be forced out to be displaced by the liquefied material. A schematic of this process is shown in
One point to be noted is that a resulting separator need not be formed from a single sheet of material. When the separator is formed from a single sheet of material that is mechanically compressed in order to make a battery, any sort of defect present may be magnified during mechanical compression. On the other hand, in a three dimensional structure as shown in
While some embodiments have been described with reference to energy storage devices, it should be recognized that the backbone structures described herein may be useful in various other types of devices to provide increased surface area per unit geometrical area (or per unit weight or volume). These other types of devices may involve various types of processes during their operation, such as heat transfer, chemical reactions, and diffusion.
While the invention has been described with reference to the specific embodiments thereof, it should be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted without departing from the true spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims. In addition, many modifications may be made to adapt a particular situation, material, composition of matter, method, operation or operations, to the objective, spirit, and scope of the invention. All such modifications are intended to be within the scope of the claims appended hereto. In particular, while the methods disclosed herein have been described with reference to particular operations performed in a particular order, it will be understood that these operations may be combined, sub-divided, or re-ordered to form an equivalent method without departing from the teachings of the invention. Accordingly, unless specifically indicated herein, the order and grouping of the operations is not a limitation of the invention.
This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. section 119(e) to: (i) U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/884,836, entitled “Electrodes For Three Dimensional Lithium Batteries And Methods Of Manufacturing Thereof,” filed on Jan. 12, 2007; (ii) U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/884,828, entitled “Three-Dimensional Batteries and Methods of Manufacturing Using Backbone Structure,” filed on Jan. 12, 2007; and (iii) U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/884,846, entitled “Three-Dimensional Lithium Battery Separator Architectures,” filed on Jan. 12, 2007; all of which are hereby incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4113579 | Randall | Sep 1978 | A |
4820599 | Furukawa et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4996129 | Tuck | Feb 1991 | A |
5294504 | Otagawa | Mar 1994 | A |
5993990 | Kanto et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6432585 | Kawakami | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6495283 | Yoon et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6498406 | Horiuchi | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6821673 | Hamada et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6833010 | Asahina et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6878173 | Miyahisa | Apr 2005 | B2 |
7056455 | Matyjaszewski | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7153609 | Kubo et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
8999558 | Rust, III et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
20020034685 | Sato et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020039283 | Nakamura et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020064708 | Asahina et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020136957 | Zhang et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20040092395 | Hase et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040185336 | Ito et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040214079 | Simburger et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040241540 | Tsutsumi et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050079418 | Kelley et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20060121342 | Sano et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060154141 | Salot et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060188784 | Sudoh et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060269845 | Xu et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060281007 | Tsutsumi et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070059584 | Nakano et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070092792 | Kasahara et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070172732 | Jung et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070243460 | Carlson et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080032170 | Wainright et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080081256 | Madou et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080081257 | Yoshida et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20090035664 | Chiang et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090117472 | Iwamoto | May 2009 | A1 |
20090142656 | Nathan et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20100003603 | Chiang et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100119936 | Inagaki et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100119939 | Misumi et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20110020701 | Park et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110111283 | Rust, III et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110171518 | Dunn et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
02388711 | May 2001 | CA |
1555588 | Dec 2004 | CN |
11233076 | Aug 1999 | JP |
2008153033 | Jul 2008 | JP |
2008153034 | Jul 2008 | JP |
2008153035 | Jul 2008 | JP |
2008153036 | Jul 2008 | JP |
2005119812 | Dec 2005 | WO |
2008030215 | Mar 2008 | WO |
2008072638 | Jun 2008 | WO |
2011154862 | Dec 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Chamran et al “Three-Dimensional Nickel-Zinc Microbatteries” MEMS 2006. Instanbul Turkey, Jan. 22-26, 2006. |
Golodnitsky et al., Advanced materials for the 3D microbattery, 2006, Journal of Power Sources, 153, 281-287. |
Chamran et al., Three-dimensional nickel-zinc microbatteries, 2006, MEMS, Jan. 22-26, 2006, 950-953. |
Patent Cooperation Treaty, International Search Report for PCT/US2008/050942, issued May 18, 2008. |
Chan et al., High-performance lithium battery anodes using silicon nanowires, Nature Nanotechnology, 3, 31-35. |
Serpo, A tenfold improvement in battery life?, ZDNet News, Jan. 15, 2008, 2 pages. |
Long et al., Three-Dimensional battery Architectures, Chemical Reviews, 2004, 104, 4463-4492. |
Liu, C., Foundations of MEMS, 2006, Chapter 10, 1-55. |
Kanamura et al., Electrophoretic fabrication of LiCoO2 positive electrodes for rechargeable lithium batteries, Journal of Power Sources, 2001, 97-98, 294-297. |
Caballero et al., LiNi.5Mn1.5O4 thick-film electrodes prepared by electrophoretic deposition for use in high voltage lithium-ion batteries, Journal of Power Sources, 156, 2006, 583. |
Wang et al., Li-+-intercalation electrochemical/chromic props of vanadium pentoxide films by sol electrophoretic deposition, Electrochimica Acta, 51, 2006, 4865-4872. |
Nishizawa et al., Template synth of polypyrrole-coated spinel LiMn2O4 nantubules and props as cathode active materials for Li batteries, J. Electrochemical Society, 1997, 1923-1927. |
Shembel et al., Thin Layer Electrolytic Monbdenum Oxysulfides for Li Secondary batteries with liquid and polymer electrolytes, 5th Adv Batteries and Accumulators, 2004. |
Kobrin et al., Molecular Vapor Deposition—An imporved Vapor-Phase deposition technique of molecular coatings for MEMS Devices, SEMI Tech Symp: (STS,ISM), 2004. |
Green et al., Structured Silicon Anodes for Li battery applications, Electrochem & Solid State Letters, 6, 2003, A75-A79. |
Shin et al., Porous silicon negative electrodes for rechargeable lithium batteries, Journal of Power Sources, 193, 2005, 314-320. |
Broussely et al., Li-ion batteries and portable power source prospects for the next 5-10 years, Journal of Power Sources, 136, 2004, 386-394. |
Lehmann, The physics of macropore formation in low doped n-type silicon, Journal of Electrochemical Society, 149(10), 1993, 2836-2843. |
Vyatkin et al., Random and ordered macropore formation in p-type silicon, Journal of Electrochemical Society, 149(1) G70-G76. |
Van Den Meerakker et al., Etching of deep macropores in 6 in. Si wafers, Journal of Electrochemical Society, 147(7), 2000, 2757-2761. |
Balakrishnan et al., Safety mechanisms in lithium-ion batteries, Journal of Power Sources, 155, 2006, 401-414. |
Arora et al., Battery separators, Chemical Reviews, 104, 2004, 4419-4462. |
Masuda, H. et al., Ordered Metal Nanohole Arrays Made by a Two-Step Replication of Honeycomb Structures of Anodic Alumina, Science, 1995, 268(5216), 1466-1468. |
Oukassi, S. et al., Microfabricated Solid State Thin Film Lithium Batteries, Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. vol. 973 © 2007 Materials Research Society , 0973-BB01-02, 7 pgs. |
Fu, Y. et al., Investigation of Aspect Ratio of Hole Drilling from Micro to Nanoscale via Focused Ion Beam Fine Milling, Proceedings of SMA Symposium, 2005, 1-5. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160013511 A1 | Jan 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60884828 | Jan 2007 | US | |
60884836 | Jan 2007 | US | |
60884846 | Jan 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12013388 | Jan 2008 | US |
Child | 14638410 | US |