Numerous pathological conditions and surgical procedures result in substantial defects in a variety of organs, tissues, and anatomical structures. In the majority of such cases, surgeons and physicians are required to repair such defects utilizing specialized types of surgical meshes, materials, and/or scaffolds. Unfortunately, the in vivo performance of known surgical materials is negatively impacted by a number of limiting factors. For instance, existing synthetic surgical meshes typically result in excessive fibrosis or scarification leading to poor tissue integration and increased risk of post-operative pain. Simultaneously, known biologic materials may induce strong immune reactions and aberrant tissue ingrowth which negatively impact patient outcomes. Additionally, existing synthetic surgical meshes can create scarification, post-operative pain, limited mobility, limited range of motion, adhesions, infections, erosion, poor biomechanical properties, and/or poor intraoperative handling.
Nanofabricated or nanofiber meshes or materials composed of reabsorbable polymer fibers tens to thousands of times smaller than individual human cells have recently been proposed as a unique substrate for implantable surgical meshes and materials. Generally, existing nanofiber materials tend to possess suboptimal mechanical performance compared to known surgical meshes. Existing nanofiber materials do not possess the tensile strength, tear resistance, and burst strength needed for numerous surgical applications or for basic intraoperative handling prior to in vivo placement. To combat this deficiency, known meshes are formed using higher fiber densities as a means of improving mechanical strength. Yet, utilization of such high-density meshes can decrease effective cellular ingrowth into the mesh, decrease mesh integration with native tissue, and reduce the biocompatibility of the polymeric implant. As a result, nanofiber materials with increased thickness and/or strength and favorable cellular and/or tissue integration and biocompatibility is needed as well as a method for producing nanofiber materials.
A three-dimensional electrospun nanofiber scaffold for use in repairing a defect in a tissue substrate is provided. The three-dimensional electrospun nanofiber scaffold includes a first layer formed by a first plurality of electrospun polymeric fibers and a second layer formed by a second plurality of electrospun polymeric fibers. The second layer is coupled to the first layer using a coupling process and includes a plurality of varying densities formed by the second plurality of electrospun polymeric fibers. The first and second layers are configured to degrade via hydrolysis after at least one of a predetermined time or an environmental condition. The three-dimensional electrospun nanofiber scaffold is configured to be applied to the tissue substrate containing the defect.
A three-dimensional electrospun nanofiber scaffold for use in repairing a defect in a tissue substrate is provided. The three-dimensional electrospun nanofiber scaffold includes a first plurality of electrospun polymeric fibers and a second plurality of electrospun polymeric fibers. The second plurality of electrospun polymeric fibers are coupled to the first plurality of electrospun polymeric fibers using a coupling process and form a plurality of varying densities within the three-dimensional electrospun nanofiber scaffold. The first plurality of electrospun polymeric fibers and the second plurality of electrospun polymeric fibers are configured to separate after at least one of a predetermined time or an environmental condition. The three-dimensional electrospun nanofiber scaffold is configured to be applied to the tissue substrate containing the defect.
A biomedical patch for use in repairing a defect in a tissue substrate is provided. The biomedical patch includes a first plurality of electrospun polymeric fibers and a second plurality of electrospun polymeric fibers. The second plurality of electrospun polymeric fibers are coupled to the first plurality of electrospun polymeric fibers using a coupling process and form a plurality of varying densities within the biomedical patch. The first plurality of electrospun polymeric fibers and the second plurality of electrospun polymeric fibers are configured to separate after at least one of a predetermined time or an environmental condition. The biomedical patch is configured to be applied to the tissue substrate containing the detect.
The embodiments described herein may be better understood by referring to the following description in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
Embodiments provided herein facilitate repairing biological tissue or reinforcing biomedical material with the use of a biomedical patch including a plurality of fibers. Such fibers may have a very small cross-sectional diameter (e.g., from 1-3000 nanometers) and, accordingly, may be referred to as nanofibers and/or microfibers. While biomedical patches are described herein with reference to dura mater and use as a surgical mesh, embodiments described may be applied to any biological tissue. Moreover, although described as biomedical patches, structures with aligned fibers may be used for other purposes. Accordingly, embodiments described are not limited to biomedical patches.
In operation, biomedical patches provided herein facilitate cell growth, provide reinforcement, and may be referred to as “membranes,” “scaffolds,” “matrices,” “meshes”, “implants”, or “substrates.” Biomedical patches with varying densities, as described herein, may promote significantly faster healing and/or regeneration of tissue such as the dura mater than existing patches constructed using conventional designs.
Dura mater is a membranous connective tissue comprising the outermost layer of the meninges surrounding the brain and spinal cord, which covers and supports the dural sinuses. Surgical meshes are often needed during neurosurgical, orthopedic, or reconstructive surgical procedures to repair, expand, reinforce, or replace the incised, damaged, or resected dura mater.
Although many efforts have been made, the challenge to develop a suitable surgical mesh for dural repair has been met with limited success. Autografts (e.g., fascia lata, temporalis fascia, and pericranium) are preferable because they do not provoke severe inflammatory or immunologic reactions. Potential drawbacks of autografts include the difficulty in achieving a watertight closure, formation of scar tissue, insufficient availability of graft materials to close large dural defects, increased risk of infection, donor site morbidity, and the need for an additional operative site. Allografts and xenograft materials are often associated with adverse effects such as graft dissolution, encapsulation, foreign body reaction, immunological reaction, contracture, scarring, adhesion formation, and toxicity-induced side effects from immunosuppressive regimens. Lyophilized human dura mater as a dural substitute has also been reported as a source of transmittable diseases, specifically involving prions, such as Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease.
In terms of synthetic surgical mesh materials, non-absorbable synthetic polymers, such as silicone and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE), often cause serious complications that may include induction of granulation tissue formation due to their chronic stimulation of the foreign body response. Natural absorbable polymers, including collagen, fibrin, and cellulose, may present a risk of infection and disease transmission. As a result, synthetic absorbable polymers such as poly (3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) (PHBV), poly (lactic acid) (PLA), polyglycolic acid (PGA), poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA), PLA-PCL-PGA ternary copolymers, and hydroxyethylmethacrylate hydrogels have recently attracted attention as biodegradable implant materials for dural repair. Methods and systems described herein may be practiced with these materials and/or any biomedical polymer whether the polymer is non-absorbable or absorbable, or synthetic in origin.
In order to facilitate successful regeneration and/or repair of the dura mater following surgery, a synthetic surgical mesh or biomedical patch should promote: i) adhesion of dural fibroblasts (the primary cell type present in the dura) to the surface of the biomedical patch; ii) migration of dural fibroblasts from the periphery of the biomedical patch into the center of the patch; iii) reinforcement or replacement of existing tissues; iv) minimal immune response; v) water tight closure of the dural membrane/dura mater; vi) mechanical support of the native dural post-operatively and during tissue regeneration/neoduralization; vii) rapid closure of the dural defect; and viii) increased ease of use.
Electrospinning is an enabling technique which can produce nanoscale fibers from a large number of polymers. The electrospun nanofibers are typically collected as a randomly-oriented, nonwoven mat. Uniaxially or radially aligned arrays of nanofibers can also be obtained under certain conditions. However, traditional nanofiber scaffolds may lack the optimal mechanical and biological properties necessary for some biomedical or surgical applications post-operatively.
In order to increase the strength of nanofiber scaffolds, custom fabrication of scaffolds into particular patterns would be highly advantageous. Additionally, multiple layers of nanofiber materials fused/coupled together in a manner that allows for a purposeful degradation of the layers can also provide strength while allowing for cellular penetration and/or tissue integration.
Many polymers are available for use in electrospinning. In some embodiments described herein, nanofibers for dura substitutes are produced as the electrospun polymer from poly (ε-caprolactone) (PCL), an FDA approved, semicrystalline polyester that can degrade via hydrolysis of its ester linkages under physiological conditions with nontoxic degradation products. This polymer has been extensively utilized and studied in the human body as a material for fabrication of drug delivery carriers, sutures, or adhesion barriers. As described herein, electrospun PCL nanofibers may be used to generate scaffolds that are useful as surgical meshes.
Embodiments provided herein facilitate producing a novel type of artificial tissue substitute including a polymeric nanofiber material, which is formed through a novel method of electrospinning. This polymeric material includes non-woven nanofibers (e.g., fibers having a diameter of 1-3000 nanometers) which are arranged or organized and aligned into patterns both within and across a material sheet.
System 100 is configured to create an electric potential between one or more collectors 105 and one or more spinnerets 120. In one embodiment, collector 105 and features 112 are configured to be electrically charged at a first amplitude and/or polarity. For example, collector 105 and features 112 may be electrically coupled to one or more power supplies 130 via one or more conductors 135. Power supply 130 is configured to charge collector 105 and features 112 at the first amplitude and/or polarity via conductor 135.
In the embodiment illustrated in
In the exemplary embodiment, pattern 110 is formed by spatially organizing features 112. In one embodiment, features 112 (e.g., ribs 114 and seams 116) are interconnected at nodes 115 such that a feature space 119 is formed between features 112 in the range of 10 um and 10 cm. In one embodiment, pattern 110 includes a plurality of spaces 119 such that multiple varying distances are formed between features 112. It should be noted that pattern can be formed to be symmetrical, repeating, and asymmetrical. In the exemplary embodiment, the shape of collector 105 enables the biomedical patch formed on collector to include additional support and/or reinforcement properties. Such additional support and/or reinforcement properties are achieved by creating high density fiber deposition areas on charged features 112 and having low density fiber deposition areas over feature spaces 119.
For example, a diamond shaped collector 105 including a diamond shaped array pattern 110 enables a diamond-shaped patch to be produced on the diamond shaped collector 105 to have different mechanical properties from a rectangular-shaped or a circular-shaped patch such as, but not limited to, tensile strength, tear resistance, terminal strain, failure mechanisms or rates, and/or controlled anisotropic properties, such as greater strength in one axis relative to another.
In one embodiment, pattern 110 defines a collector plane 127 and spinneret 120 is orthogonally offset from the collector plane 127 at a variable distance. For example, spinneret 120 may be orthogonally offset from the collector plane 127 at a distance of 50 micrometers to 100 centimeters. Alternatively, spinneret 120 can be offset from collector 105 in any manner that facilitates creating patches as described herein, including but not limited to, horizontal and diagonal or skew.
Spinneret 120 is configured to dispense a polymer 140 while electrically charged at a second amplitude and/or polarity opposite the first amplitude and/or polarity. As shown in
In one embodiment, spinneret 120 is coupled to a dispensing mechanism 150 containing polymer 140 in a liquid solution form. In such an embodiment, dispensing mechanism 150 is operated manually by a dispensing pump 155. Alternatively, dispensing mechanism 150 can be operated automatically with any mechanism configured to dispense nanofibers as described herein. In the exemplary embodiment, spinneret 120 includes a metallic needle having an aperture between 10 micrometers and 3 millimeters in diameter for dispensing nanofibers.
As dispensing mechanism 150 pressurizes polymer 140, spinneret 120 dispenses polymer 140 as a jet or stream 160. In one embodiment, stream 160 is dispensed in a horizontal or sideways stream from spinneret 120. Stream 160 has a diameter approximately equal to the aperture diameter of spinneret 120. Stream 160 descends toward collector 105 forming a Taylor cone. For example, stream 160 may fall downward under the influence of gravity and/or may be attracted downward by charge distributed on the fibers and on features 112. As stream 160 descends, polymer 140 forms one or more solid polymeric fibers 165. In the exemplary embodiment, fibers 165 are solid, however it should be noted that fibers 165 can have any structure including by not limited to, core or shell, porous, co-axial, and co-axial. Alternatively, polymer 140 deposition can be accomplished by any other fiber deposition method including but not limited to, solvent electrospinning, force electrospinning, melt electrospinning, extrusion, and melt blowing.
In some embodiments, a mask 164 composed of a conducting or non-conducting material is applied to collector 105 to manipulate deposition of fibers 165. For example, mask 164 may be positioned between spinneret 120 and collector 105 such that no fibers 165 are deposited on collector 105 beneath mask 164. Moreover, mask 164 may be used as a time-variant mask by adjusting its position between the spinneret and the collector while spinneret 120 dispenses polymer 140, facilitating spatial variation of fiber density on collector 105. While mask 164 is shown as circular, mask 164 may have any shape (e.g., rectangular or semi-circular) and size suitable for use with system 100. Alternatively, or in addition, deposition of fibers 165 on collector 105 may be manipulated by adjusting the position of collector 105 with respect to spinneret 120 or by spatially varying the electrical potential applied between the spinneret 120 and/or the electrodes making up the collector 105. For example, positioning one side of collector 105 directly beneath spinneret 120 may cause more fibers 165 to be deposited on that side than are deposited on the opposite side of collector 105 in a Gaussian distribution. To modulate the spatial distribution of fibers forming on collector 105, in some embodiments, a focusing device 138 is utilized to focus fiber deposition in a particular special region. In such an embodiment, focusing device 138 is charged with a polarity similar to spinneret 120 and includes an aperture allowing fiber deposition to occur substantially in the space under the aperture. Focusing device 138 may have any geometry that allows for receipt of nanofibers from spinneret 120 and deposition of the received nanofibers onto collector 105 as described herein.
Patch 170 is illustrated with a small quantity of fibers 165 in
The alignment of fibers 165 illustrates a patch 170 with varying densities. Patch 170 enables reinforcement or structural integrity to be provided in predetermined locations. For example, a larger deposition of fibers occurs in various locations, such as portion 167, which provide structural reinforcement. Accordingly, system 100 enables the creation of customized materials 170 for individual biomedical or clinical and non-clinical applications.
In the exemplary embodiment, fibers 165 have a diameter of 1-3000 nanometers. In one embodiment, fibers have a diameter of approximately 220 nanometers (e.g., 215 nm to 225 nm). It should be noted that the diameter of the fibers 165, thickness of the patch 170, and/or fiber density within the patch 170 may affect the durability (e.g., tensile strength, suture pullout strength, conformability, etc.) of patch 170. As such, the diameter of the fibers 165, thickness of the patch 170, and/or fiber density within the patch 170 can be selected according to the requirements of the end application of the material. Patch 170 may be produced with various mechanical properties by varying the thickness and/or the fiber density, spatial patterning, polymer composition, and/or number of layers of the patch 170 by operating electrospinning system 100 for relatively longer or shorter durations, changing the polymeric solution, changing the chemical composition, changing collector 105, changing collector design, and/or changing the manner of fiber deposition.
Referring to
Fiber spinnerets 120A and 120B facilitate incorporating a substance, such as a biological agent, growth factor, and/or a drug (e.g., a chemotherapeutic substance), into patch 170. For example, the substance may be deposited within a cavity defined by co-axial fibers 165 of patch 170. In one embodiment, polymer 140 is selected to create porous and/or semi-soluble fibers 165, and the substance is dispensed from the cavity through fibers 165. In another embodiment, polymer 140 is degradable, and the substance is dispensed as fibers 165 degrade in vivo. For example, fibers 165 may be configured to degrade within a second to 1 second to 12 months. In one embodiment, a burst release of the substance occurs upon entry into a system and an elution occurs over a predetermined period of time. The degradation rate of polymer 140 may be manipulated by any loading and/or release method such as adjusting a ratio of constituent polymers within polymer 140, loading the agent into the bulk of the material, functionalizing the agent to the surface of the fibers, and/or releasing the agent by degradation of the polymer or by diffusion of the agent from the polymer. In another embodiment, a substance is delivered by solid fibers 165. For example, a solid fiber 165 may be created from a polymer 140 including the substance in solution. As solid fiber 165 degrades, the substance is released into the surrounding tissue.
As shown in
In some embodiments, multiple biomedical patch layers 410-425 may be combined to create a multi-layer biomedical patch. For example, referring to
In the exemplary embodiment, individual layers are fused or coupled together such that the layers delaminate or separate under specific environmental or temporal conditions. Such controlled delamination results in maximization of mechanical stability of the nanofiber material and the biological interaction (e.g. cellular ingrowth, tissue integration, cellular exposure, etc.) between adjacent layers of nanofibers. In the exemplary embodiment, the process of fusing or coupling layers includes, but is not limited to, heating, applying mechanical stress/pressure, applying an adhesive, chemical processing, cross-linking, and functionalization.
In one embodiment, adjacent layers are similarly or variably fused, adhered, or joined such that each layer delaminates or separates at a substantially similar rate within patch 435. Alternatively, layers can be fused together with variable methods such that each layer delaminates at different rates.
A multi-layered biomedical patch may be useful for dural grafts as well as other tissue engineering applications. Sequential layers of fibers can be created with varying orders (e.g., radially aligned, reinforced, or randomly oriented), densities (e.g., low, high, or mixture of fiber density), patterns or reinforcement, and compositions (polymer), which may allow specific types of cells to infiltrate and populate select layers of the artificial biomedical patch. For example, biomedical patches containing a high fiber density generally prohibit cellular migration and infiltration, while biomedical patches containing a low fiber density generally enhance cellular migration and infiltration. Such additional support and/or reinforcement properties are achieved by creating high density fiber deposition that discourages cellular penetration and having low density fiber deposition areas that promote cellular penetration and/or ingrowth.
Overall, the ability to form multi-layered fiber materials, as described herein, may be extremely beneficial in the construction of biomedical patches designed to recapitulate the natural multi-laminar structure of not only dura mater, but also other biological tissues such as skin, heart valve leaflets, pericardium, and/or any other biological tissue. Furthermore, one or more layers of a biomedical patch may be fabricated from bioresorbable polymers such that the resulting nanofiber materials fully resorb following implantation. Manipulation of the chemical composition of the polymers utilized to fabricate these scaffolds may further allow for specific control of the rate of degradation and/or resorption of a biomedical patch following implantation.
In one embodiment, a substance such as a growth factor and/or a drug (e.g., a chemotherapeutic drug) is applied 815 to the biomedical patch. In the exemplary embodiment growth factor and/or a drug is applied 815 pre-operatively. However, it should be noted that growth factor and/or a drug may be applied 815 at any time including, but not limited to, intra-operatively and post-operatively. In one embodiment, the biomedical patch may be immersed in the substance to allow the substance to occupy a cavity within co-axial fibers of the biomedical patch, dope the polymer comprising the fibers in the biomedical patch, or coat the surface of the fibers within the biomedical patch.
In the exemplary embodiment, the patch is applied 820 to (e.g., overlaid on) the biological tissue to cover, repair, reinforce, and/or fill at least a portion of the defect. For example, the biomedical patch may be applied 820 to dura mater tissue, cardiac tissue, and/or any biological tissue including a defect. In one embodiment, the perimeter of the biomedical patch extends past the perimeter of the defect, such that the entire defect is covered by the biomedical patch. In some embodiments, the biomedical patch is coupled 825 to the biological tissue with a plurality of sutures, adhesive, and/or any other means of attaching the biomedical patch to the biological tissue (inlay). In an alternative embodiment, the biomedical patch is simply allowed to fuse to the biological tissue, such as by adhesion of biological cells to the biomedical patch (onlay). In another embodiment, biomedical patch may be directly coupled to the edge of the tissue with no overlap. In one embodiment, biomedical patch may be overlaid on top of a wound/defect or injury covering the entirety of the defect or injury without filling the defect.
In one embodiment, after the biomedical patch is applied 820 and optionally coupled 825 to the biological tissue, the biological tissue is covered 830. Alternatively, the patch may be the terminal covering. In such an embodiment, a backing that is either non-permeable or permeable may be coupled to the patch. In one embodiment, other tissue overlaying the defect (e.g., dermis and/or epidermis) is repaired (e.g., sutured closed). In another embodiment, one or more protective layers are applied over the biological tissue. For example, a bandage may be applied to a skin graft, with or without a protective substance, such as a gel, an ointment, and/or an antibacterial agent. In one embodiment, the protective layer includes, but is not limited to, a covering, film tissue, dressing, mesh, and nanofiber structure, such as an additional biomedical patch, as described herein.
Embodiments described herein are operable with any surgical procedure involving the repair, replacement, or expansion of the dura mater, including, but not limited to, a transphenoidal procedure (e.g., surgical removal of pituitary adenomas), various types of skull base surgeries, and/or surgical removal of cranial or spinal tumors (e.g., meningiomas and/or astrocytomas). In one embodiment, a biomedical patch may be applied to a bone fracture (e.g., a complex fracture). In another embodiment, a biomedical patch may be applied to a defect in the skin (e.g. a burn).
Moreover, such embodiments provide a dura mater substitute, a biomedical patch for a skin graft (e.g., dermal or epidermal), a biomedical patch for tracheal repair, a scaffold for an artificial heart valve leaflet, an artificial mesh for surgical repair of a gastrointestinal tract (e.g., an abdominal hernia or an ulcer), an artificial mesh for surgical repair of cardiac defects. Embodiments described herein facilitate providing a cardiac patch of sufficient flexibility to enable movement of the biomedical patch by a biological tissue (e.g., cardiomyocytes or cardiac tissue, muscle, skin, connective tissue, intestinal tissue, stomach tissue, bone, gastrointestinal tract, and mucosa).
In some embodiments, a biomedical patch has a thickness greater or less than a thickness of the biological tissue being repaired. Biomedical patches with spatially organized polymeric fibers facilitate reducing the expense of tissue repair, improving tissue healing time, and reducing or eliminating the risk of zoonotic infection. Moreover, such biomedical patches are relatively simple to manufacture, enabling customization of shape, size, and chemical composition and improved availability and non-immunogenicity. In addition, biomedical patches with spatially organized polymeric fibers exhibit excellent handling properties due to their cloth-like composition, eliminate the need for a second surgery to harvest autologous graft tissue, and reduce the risk of contracture and adhesion when compared with known products. Additionally, the patches described herein facilitate reinforcement, buttressing, lamination, and/or sealing in a variety of applications such as but not limited to clinical and non-clinical applications.
Although the foregoing description contains many specifics, these should not be construed as limiting the scope of the present disclosure, but merely as providing illustrations of some of the presently preferred embodiments. Similarly, other embodiments of the invention may be devised which do not depart from the spirit or scope of the present invention. For example, while the illustrative examples have been used in with clinical applications, the above described nanofiber structures can have non-clinical application such as filtration, textiles, membrane technology, and coatings. Features from different embodiments may be employed in combination. The scope of the invention is, therefore, indicated and limited only by the appended claims and their legal equivalents, rather than by the foregoing description. All additions, deletions, and modifications to the invention as disclosed herein which fall within the meaning and scope of the claims are to be embraced thereby.
As used herein, an element or step recited in the singular and proceeded with the word “a” or “an” should be understood as not excluding plural elements or steps, unless such exclusion is explicitly recited. Furthermore, references to “one embodiment” of the present invention are not intended to be interpreted as excluding the existence of additional embodiments that also incorporate the recited features.
This written description uses examples to disclose various embodiments, which include the best mode, to enable any person skilled in the art to practice those embodiments, including making and using any devices or systems and performing any incorporated methods. The patentable scope is defined by the claims, and may include other examples that occur to those skilled in the art. Such other examples are intended to be within the scope of the claims if they have structural elements that do not differ from the literal language of the claims, or if they include equivalent structural elements with insubstantial differences from the literal languages of the claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 17/381,792, filed Jul. 21, 2021, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 17/229,226, now U.S. Pat. No. 11,173,234, filed Apr. 13, 2021, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/872,926, filed May 12, 2020, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/540,779, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,682,444, filed Aug. 14, 2019, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/131,887, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,441,685, filed Sep. 14, 2018, which is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/429,976, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,124,089, filed Mar. 20, 2015, which are incorporated herein in their entirety. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/429,976 is a U.S. National Phase Patent Application of International Application Serial Number PCT/US2012/056548, filed Sep. 21, 2012, which is incorporated herein in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2068703 | Powdermaker | Jan 1937 | A |
3280229 | Simons | Oct 1966 | A |
3338992 | Kinney | Aug 1967 | A |
3341394 | Kinney | Sep 1967 | A |
3502763 | Hartmann | Mar 1970 | A |
3542615 | Dobo et al. | Nov 1970 | A |
3692618 | Dorsclmer et al. | Sep 1972 | A |
3740302 | Soelmgen | Jun 1973 | A |
3802817 | Matsuki et al. | Apr 1974 | A |
3849241 | Butin et al. | Nov 1974 | A |
3909009 | Cvetko et al. | Sep 1975 | A |
4044404 | Martin et al. | Aug 1977 | A |
4340563 | Appel et al. | Jul 1982 | A |
4468428 | Early et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
4738740 | Pinchuk et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4965110 | Berry | Oct 1990 | A |
5024789 | Berry | Jun 1991 | A |
5079080 | Schwartz | Jan 1992 | A |
5306550 | Nishiyama et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5464450 | Buscemi et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5591335 | Barboza et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5626611 | Liu et al. | May 1997 | A |
5795584 | Totakura et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5851937 | Wu et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5997568 | Liu | Dec 1999 | A |
6147135 | Yuan et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6162535 | Turkevich et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6171338 | Talja et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6180848 | Flament et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6183670 | Torobin et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6265333 | Dzenis et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6306424 | Vyakarnam et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6391060 | Ory et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6596296 | Nelson et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6630231 | Perez et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6649807 | Mizutani | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6685956 | Chu et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6689374 | Chu et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6713011 | Chu et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6753454 | Smith et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6790455 | Chu et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6797655 | Rudisill | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6946506 | Bond et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7134857 | Andrady et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7172765 | Chu et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7192604 | Brown et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7655070 | Dallas et al. | Feb 2010 | B1 |
7759082 | Bowlin et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7846466 | Shea et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7799262 | Kim | Sep 2010 | B1 |
7879093 | Wei et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7981353 | Mitchell et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8066932 | Xu | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8222166 | Chu et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8273369 | Moloye-Olabisi et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8652215 | Bellamkonda et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8728463 | Atala et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8728817 | Ogle et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8809212 | Dirk et al. | Aug 2014 | B1 |
8852621 | Patel et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
9074172 | Johnson | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9085830 | Mitchell et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9163331 | Atala et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9168231 | Patel et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9345486 | Zhang et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9393097 | McCullen et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9476026 | Arinzeh et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9487893 | Moore et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9539365 | Kasuga et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9572909 | Simpson et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9585666 | Yu et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9737632 | Johnson et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9884027 | Johnson | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9938373 | Wang et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
10016464 | Murphy et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10080687 | MacEwan | Sep 2018 | B2 |
10124089 | MacEwan | Nov 2018 | B2 |
10149749 | MacEwan et al. | Dec 2018 | B2 |
10166315 | Johnson et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10227568 | Johnson | Mar 2019 | B2 |
10231821 | Gabriele et al. | Mar 2019 | B2 |
10233427 | Johnson | Mar 2019 | B2 |
10239262 | Johnson | Mar 2019 | B2 |
10294449 | Johnson | May 2019 | B2 |
10335154 | Johnson et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10363041 | Yu et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10381672 | Lee et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10405963 | McAlpine et al. | Sep 2019 | B2 |
10406346 | Scott-Carnell et al. | Sep 2019 | B2 |
10413574 | Fong et al. | Sep 2019 | B2 |
10420856 | Arinzeh et al. | Sep 2019 | B2 |
10441403 | MacEwan et al. | Oct 2019 | B1 |
10441685 | MacEwan | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10588734 | MacEwan et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
10617512 | MacEwan | Apr 2020 | B2 |
10632228 | MacEwan | Apr 2020 | B2 |
10682444 | MacEwan | Jun 2020 | B2 |
10738152 | Wang et al. | Aug 2020 | B2 |
10888409 | MacEwan et al. | Jan 2021 | B2 |
11000358 | MacEwan et al. | May 2021 | B2 |
11096772 | MacEwan et al. | Aug 2021 | B1 |
11173234 | MacEwan | Nov 2021 | B2 |
11253635 | MacEwan | Feb 2022 | B2 |
11311366 | MacEwan et al. | Apr 2022 | B2 |
20020081732 | Bowlin et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020090725 | Simpson et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020173213 | Chu et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020192251 | Collin | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030004579 | Rousseau et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030054035 | Chu et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20040013819 | Hou et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040018226 | Wnek et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040037813 | Simpson et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040096532 | Dubson et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040102614 | Islam et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20050104258 | Lennhoff | May 2005 | A1 |
20050167311 | Tonsfeldt et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050222591 | Gingras et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060085063 | Shastri et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060094320 | Chen et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060153904 | Smith et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060193578 | Ouderkirk et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060014460 | Isele et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060204539 | Atala et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060240110 | Kick et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060246798 | Reneker et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060263417 | Lelkes et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060264140 | Andrady et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070073344 | Jahns et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070152378 | Kim | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070155273 | Chu et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070225631 | Bowlin et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070269481 | Li et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080065123 | Yli-Urpo et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080112998 | Wang et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080207798 | Hellring et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080208358 | Bellamkonda et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080220042 | Hashi et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080237934 | Reneker et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090028921 | Arinzeh | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090074832 | Zussman et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090075354 | Reneker et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090155326 | Mack et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090162468 | Barinov et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090171467 | Mann et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090202616 | Chong et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090214614 | Everland et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090228021 | Leung | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090317446 | Tan et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100003305 | Pattanaik | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100047309 | Lu et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100061962 | Li | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100076377 | Ehrenreich et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100092687 | Sumida et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100093093 | Leong et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100119564 | Kasuga et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100120115 | Ogle et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100166854 | Michniak Kohn et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100174368 | Lynch et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100179659 | Li et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100185219 | Gertzman et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100190254 | Chian et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100233115 | Patel et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100273258 | Lannutti et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100291182 | Palasis et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100292791 | Lu et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100297208 | Fry et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100330419 | Cui et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100331980 | Lee et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110087277 | Vola et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110098826 | Mauck et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110101571 | Reneker | May 2011 | A1 |
20110111012 | Pepper et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110150973 | Bowlin et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110152897 | Bates | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110174158 | Walls et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110180951 | Teo et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110242310 | Beebe, Jr. et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110280919 | Moloye-Olabisi et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110287082 | Smith et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120015331 | Wood et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120029654 | Xu et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120040581 | Kim | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120123342 | Andrews et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120165957 | Everland et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120225039 | Li et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120265300 | Mauck et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120310260 | Hamlin et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120330437 | El-Kurdi et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130035704 | Dudai | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130110138 | Hurtado | May 2013 | A1 |
20130115457 | Haynie et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130197663 | MacEwan et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130251762 | Wei et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130338791 | McCullen et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140030315 | Johnson | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140081297 | Hoke et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140128345 | Woodrow et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140272225 | Johnson | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140303727 | Atlas et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140322512 | Pham et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150045818 | Kim et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150132423 | Johnson | May 2015 | A1 |
20150190285 | MacEwan | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150250927 | MacEwan | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150297791 | Patel et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150342719 | Patel et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20160022873 | Besner et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160083692 | Hardy et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160083868 | Park | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160136330 | Benkirane-Jessel et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160302869 | Chopra | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160317706 | Johnson | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20170095591 | Zuhaib et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170119886 | Johnson et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170182206 | Johnson et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170182211 | Raxworthy et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170319323 | MacEwan et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170319742 | Johnson et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170326270 | MacEwan | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20180116973 | Jonnson | May 2018 | A1 |
20180161185 | Kresslein et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180174367 | Marom et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180221537 | Johnson et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180237952 | Johnson et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180245243 | Krieger et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180263919 | Hoke et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180368917 | Dekel et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190015563 | MacEwan | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190021837 | MacEwan et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190054036 | Johnson et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190102880 | Parpara et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190105128 | Velazquez et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190134267 | Francis et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190134570 | Pintauro et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190153398 | Johnson | May 2019 | A1 |
20190175786 | Cohen et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190249127 | Johnson | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190269829 | Johnson | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190271098 | Johnson et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190328393 | Yu et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190330419 | Song et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190350688 | Hurtado et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190365520 | MacEwan et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20190365958 | MacEwan | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20190374227 | Johnson et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20200000570 | MacEwan et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200060800 | MacEwan et al. | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200197153 | MacEwan et al. | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200229679 | Zhao et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200242767 | Zhao et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200277711 | Xie | Sep 2020 | A1 |
20200390932 | MacEwan | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20210001014 | MacEwan | Jan 2021 | A1 |
20210030525 | MacEwan et al. | Feb 2021 | A1 |
20210052362 | MacEwan et al. | Feb 2021 | A1 |
20210228782 | MacEwan | Jul 2021 | A1 |
20210236691 | MacEwan | Aug 2021 | A1 |
20210267746 | MacEwan et al. | Sep 2021 | A1 |
20210338408 | MacEwan et al. | Nov 2021 | A1 |
20220175510 | MacEwan et al. | Jun 2022 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2011268321 | Oct 2015 | AU |
2012390291 | Sep 2017 | AU |
2094908 | Feb 2000 | CA |
2802482 | Dec 2011 | CA |
2386810 | Sep 2013 | CA |
102260963 | Nov 2011 | CN |
102691176 | Sep 2012 | CN |
103599562 | Feb 2014 | CN |
104894750 | Sep 2015 | CN |
102014107826 | Dec 2014 | DE |
0515522 | Oct 1993 | EP |
0571415 | Jul 1995 | EP |
0757127 | Feb 1997 | EP |
2045375 | Mar 2011 | EP |
2599858 | Jun 2013 | EP |
2582868 | Mar 2018 | EP |
2358301 | Jul 2019 | EP |
3508641 | Aug 2020 | EP |
2897561 | Nov 2020 | EP |
3741896 | Nov 2020 | EP |
1286858 | Aug 1972 | GB |
2181207 | Apr 1987 | GB |
2195251 | Apr 1988 | GB |
H03161563 | Jul 1991 | JP |
3487722 | Jan 2004 | JP |
2005534828 | Nov 2005 | JP |
2006283241 | Oct 2006 | JP |
2006328562 | Dec 2006 | JP |
2007303021 | Nov 2007 | JP |
2008223186 | Sep 2008 | JP |
2009061109 | Mar 2009 | JP |
2011509786 | Mar 2011 | JP |
4769871 | Sep 2011 | JP |
4979264 | Jul 2012 | JP |
2012528464 | Nov 2012 | JP |
2013518996 | May 2013 | JP |
2013534979 | Sep 2013 | JP |
6295258 | Mar 2018 | JP |
6328672 | May 2018 | JP |
100439871 | Jul 2004 | KR |
20060118937 | Nov 2006 | KR |
1020070047873 | May 2007 | KR |
101703095 | Oct 2013 | KR |
186379 | Jan 2013 | SG |
11201502207W | Apr 2015 | SG |
1991001695 | Feb 1991 | WO |
2001027365 | Apr 2001 | WO |
2002000149 | Jan 2002 | WO |
2004016839 | Feb 2004 | WO |
2006096791 | Sep 2006 | WO |
2006123858 | Nov 2006 | WO |
2007086910 | Aug 2007 | WO |
2008069760 | Jun 2008 | WO |
2009093023 | Jul 2009 | WO |
2010041944 | Apr 2010 | WO |
2010042651 | Apr 2010 | WO |
2010112564 | Oct 2010 | WO |
2010138619 | Dec 2010 | WO |
2011095141 | Aug 2011 | WO |
2011159889 | Dec 2011 | WO |
2012080706 | Jun 2012 | WO |
2013025819 | Feb 2013 | WO |
2013050428 | Apr 2013 | WO |
2013078051 | May 2013 | WO |
2013106822 | Jul 2013 | WO |
2014031721 | Feb 2014 | WO |
2014046669 | Mar 2014 | WO |
2014145864 | Sep 2014 | WO |
2014152906 | Sep 2014 | WO |
2015048224 | Apr 2015 | WO |
2015116917 | Aug 2015 | WO |
2015153011 | Oct 2015 | WO |
2015157485 | Oct 2015 | WO |
2016176559 | Nov 2016 | WO |
2017024263 | Feb 2017 | WO |
2017035500 | Mar 2017 | WO |
2017044982 | Mar 2017 | WO |
2017079328 | May 2017 | WO |
2017196325 | Nov 2017 | WO |
2018112203 | Jun 2018 | WO |
2018144858 | Aug 2018 | WO |
Entry |
---|
3rd International Conference on Electrospinning Conference Program dated Aug. 4-7, 2004, www.ceramics.org/electrospin2014. |
ASTM Standard F2450-10, “Guide for Assessing Microstructure of Polymeric Scaffolds for Use in Tissue-Engineered Medical Products” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 10 pages (Mar. 27, 2013). |
Barbol et al., “Biocompatibility evaluation of dura mater substitutes in an animal model,” Neurological Research, 23(8): 813-820 (2001). |
Beachley et al., “Polymer nanofibrous structures: Fabrication, biolunctionalization, and cell interactions,” Progress in Polymer Science, 35(7): 868-892 (2010). |
Beheshtkhoo et al., “Fabrication and Properties of Collagen and Polyurethane Polymeric Nanofibers Using Electrospinning Techniques,” Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques, 7(4): 802-807 (2019). |
Bhattarai et al. “Electrospun chitosa-based nanofibers and their cellular compatibility”, Biomaterials, 26(31): 6176-6184 (2005). |
Bognitzki et al., “Preparation of Fibers with Nanoscaled Morphologies: Electrospinning of Polmer Blends,” Polymer Engineering and Science, 41(6): 982-989 (2001). |
Bognitzki et al., “Nanostructured Fibers via Electrospinning,” Advanced Materials, 13(1): 70-72 (2001). |
Boland et al., “Tissue Engineering Scaffolds,” Encyclopedia of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering, 2(L-Z): 1630-1638 (2004). |
Boland et al., “Tailoring Tissue Engineering Scaffolds Using Electrostatic Proceedings Techniques: A Study of Poly(Glycolic acid) Electrospinning,” Journal of Macromolecular Science, 38(12): 1231-1243 (2001). |
Camposeo et al., “Lobal Mechanical Properties of Electrospun Fibers Correlate to Their Internal Nanostructure,” NANO Letters, 13(11): 5056-5062 (2013). |
Chakrapani et al., “Electrospinning of Type I Collagen and PCL Nanofibers Using Acetic Acid,” J. Applied Polymer Science, 125(4): 3221-3227 (2012); Wiley Online Library, Feb. 1, 2012. |
Chen et al., “Electrospun 3D Fibrous Scaffolds for Chronic Wound Repair,” Materials, 9(4): 272 (2016). |
Chen et al., “Preparation and characterization of coaxial electrospun thermoplastic polyurethane/collagen compound nanofibers for tissue engineering applications,” Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, 79(2): 315-325 (2010). |
Chen et al., “Preparation and Study of TPU/Collagen Complex Nanofiber via Electrospinning,” AATCC Review, 10(2): 59-63 (2010). |
Cheng et al., “Engineering the Microstructure of Electrospun Fibrous Scaffolds by Microtopography,” Biomacromolecules 14(5): 1349-1360 (2013) doi: 10.1021/bm302000n). |
Choi et al., “Formation of interfiber bonding in electrospun poly (etherimide) nanofiber web,” Journal of Materials Science, 39(4): 1511-1513 (2004). |
Chong, et al., “Evaluation of electrospun PCL/gelatin nanofibrous scaffold for wound healing and layered dermal reconstruction,” Acta Biomaterialia, 3(3): 321-330 (2007). |
Clark et al., “Investigation of the Effect of Cell Seeding on Neotissue Formation in a Tissue Engineered Trachea,” J. Pediatric Surgery, 51(1): 49-55 (2016). |
Cole et al., “A comparative long-term assessment of four soft tissue substitutes,” Aesthetic Surgery Journal, 31(6): 674-681 (2011). |
Cui et al., “Controlled assembly of poly(vinyl pyrrolidone) fibers through an electric-field-assisted electrospinning method,” Applied Physics A, 103(1): 167-172 (2011). |
Davis, et al., “A biodegradable compsite artifical tendon,” Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine 3: 359-364 (1992). |
Deitzel et al., “The Effect of Processing Variables on the Morphology of Electrospun Nanofibers and Textiles,” Polymer, 42(1): 261-272 (2001). |
Dempsey et al., “Micropatteming of Electrospun Polyurethane Fibers Through Control of Surface Topography,” Macromolecular Materials and Engineering, 295(11): 990-994 (2020). |
Dhandayuthapani et al., “Polymeric Scaffolds in Tissue Engineering Application: A Review,” International Journal of Polymer Science, vol. 2011, Article ID 290602, (19 pages). |
Diaz et al., “Fabrication of structured micro and nanofibers by coaxial electrospinning,” Journal of Physics, Conference Series, 127(1): 1-8 (2008) 012008. |
Ding et al., “Fabrication of blend biodegradable nanofibrous nonwoven mats via multi-jet electrospinning,” Polymer, 45(6): 1895-1902 (2004). |
Doshi, et al., “Electrospinning Process and Applications of Electrospun Fibers,” Journal of Electrostatics, 35: 151-160 (1995). |
Dubsky et al., “Nanofibers Prepared by Needleless Electrospinning Technology as Scaffolds for Wound Healing,” J Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, 23(4): 931-941(2012), DOI: 10.1007/s10856-012-4577-7. |
Dzenis et al., “Hierarchical nano-/micromaterials based on electrospun polymer fibers: Predictive models for thermomechanical behavior” Journal of Computer-Aided Materials Design, 3: 403-408 (1996). |
Dzenis et al., “Polymer Hybrid Nano/Micro Composites,” Proceedings of the American Society for Composites Ninth Technical Conference, pp. 657-665, 1994. |
Fang et al., “Electrospinning: An Advanced Nanofiber Production Technology.” In: H. Niu, H. Zhou and H. Wang (Eds.), Energy Harvesting Properties of Electrospun Nanofibers (1st ed. [online], pp. 1-1-1-44). IOP Publishing Ltd. (2020). https://iopscience.iop.org/book/978-0-7503-2005-4/chapter/bk978-0-7503-2005-4ch1 (Accessed Apr. 6, 2021), doi 10.1088/978-0-7503-2005-4ch1. |
Figallo et al., “Micropattemed biopolymer 3D scaffold for static and dynamic culture of human fibroblasts,” Biotechnology Progress, 23(1): 210-216 (2007). |
Foy et al., “Allergic reaction to a bovine dural substitute following spinal cord untethering,” Case Report, Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics, 1(2): 167-169 (2008). |
Fridrikh et al., “Controlling the Fiber Diameter during Electrospinning,” The American Physical Society, 90(14): 144502 (2003). |
Grafe et al., “Nanofiber Webs from Electrospinning,” Nonwovens in Filtration—Fifth International Conference, Stuttgart, Germany, Mar. 2003 (5 pages). |
Gibson et al., “Electrospun Fiber Mats: Transport Properties,” AIChE Journal, 45(1): 190-195 (1999). |
Huang et al., “Generation of Synthetic Elastin-Mimetic Small Diameter Fibers and Fiber Networks,” Macromolecules 33(8): 2989-2997 (2000). |
Huang et al., “A review on polymer nanofibers by electrospinning and their applications in nanocomposites,” Composites Science and Technology, 63(15): 2223-2253 (2003). |
Jaeger et al., “Electrospinning of Ultra-Thin Polymer Fibers,” Macromolecular Symposia, 127(1): 141-150 (1998). |
Ju et al., “Bilayered scaffold for engineering cellularized blood vessels,” Biomaterials, 31(15): 4313-4321 (2010). |
Kenawy et al., “Release of tetracycline hydrochloride from electrospun poly(ethylene-co-vinylacetate), poly(lactic acid), and a blend,” Journal of Controlled Release, 81(1-2): 57-64 (2002). |
Khil et al., “Novel Fabricated Matrix via Electrospinning for Tissue Engineering,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, Part B, Applied Biomaterials, 72B(1): 117-124 (2004), https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.30122. |
Kidoaki et al., “Mesoscopic spatial designs of nano- and microfiber meshes for tissue-engineering matrix and scaffold based on newly devised multilayering and mixing electrospinning techniques,” Biomaterials, 26(1): 37-46 (2005). |
Le et al., “Engineering a Biocompatible Scaffold with Either Micrometre or Nanometre Scale Surface Topography for Promoting Protein Adsorption and Cellular Response,” International Journal of Biomaterials, 2013: 1-16 (2013). |
Lee et al., “Development of a composite vascular scaffolding system that withstands physiological vascular conditions,” Biomaterials, 29(19): 2891-2898 (2008). |
Kumar et al., “Nanofibers: Effective Generation by Electrospinning and Their Applications,” Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, 12(1): 1-25 (2012). |
Li et al., “Direct Fabrication of Composite and Ceramic Hollow Nanofibers by Electrospinning” Nano Letters, 4(5) 933-938 (2004). |
Li, et al., “Electrospinning Nanofibers as Uniaxially Aligned Arrays and Layer-by-Layer Stacked Films” Advanced Materials, 16(4): 361-366 (2004). |
Li et al., “Electrospinning of Nanofibers: Reinventing the Wheel?” Advanced Materials, 16(14): 1151-1170 (2004). |
Li, et al., “Electrospinning of Polymeric and Ceramic Nanofibers as Uniaxially Aligned Arrays” Nano Letters, 3(8): 1167-1171 (2003). |
Liu et al., “Tensile Mechanics of Electrospun Multiwalled Nanotube/Poly(methyl methacrylate) Nanofibers,” Advanced Materials, 19(9): 1228-1233 (2007). |
Liu et al., “Electrospun Fibrous Mats on Lithographically Micropattemed Collectors to Control Cellular Behaviors,” Langmuir 28(49): 17134-17142 (2012), doi: 10.1021/la303490x. |
Madhugiri et al., “Electrospun MEH-PPV/SBA-15 Composite Nanofibers Using a Dual Syringe Method,” J. American Chemical Society, 125(47): 14531-14538 (2003). |
Manavitehrani et al., “Biomedical Applications of Biodegradable Polyesters,” Polymers, 8(1): Article 20, 32 pages (2016). |
Martinez-Lage et al. “Accidental transmission of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease by dural cadaveric grafts” Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 57(9): 1091-1094 (1994). |
McClure et al., “The use of air-flow impedance to control fiber deposition patterns during electrospinning,” Biomaterials, 33(3): 771-779 (2012). |
McMillan et al. “Small diameter poro poly (ϵ-caprolactone) films enhance adhesion and growth of human cultured epidermal keratinocyte and dermal fibroblast cells,” Tissue Engineering, 13(4): 789-798 (2007). |
Merriam-Webster “FIBER” Definition downloaded from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/fiber on Jul. 11, 2021. |
Mi, Fwu-Log et al. “Asymmetric chitosan membranes prepared by dry/wet phase separation: a new type of wound dressing for controlled antibacterial release,” Journal of Membrane Science, 212(1-2): 237-254 (2003). |
Murthy et al. “Biodegradation of Polymers,” Polymer Science: A Comprehensive Reference, 9: 547-560 (2012). |
Norris et al., “Electrostatic Fabrication of Ultrafine Conducting Fibers: Polyaniline/Polyethylene Oxide Blends” Synthetic Metals 114(2): 109-114 (2000). |
Park et al., “Apparat for Preparing Electrospun Nanofibers: Designing and Electrospinning process for Nanofiber Fabrication,” Polymer International, 56(11): 1361-1366 (2007). |
Pepper et al., “Factors Influencing Poor Outcomes in Synthetic Tissue-Engineered Tracheal Replacement,” Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 161(3): 458-467 (2019). |
Pham et al. “Electrospun poly (ϵ-caprolactone) microfiber and multilayer nanofiber/microfiber scaffold: characterization of scaffolds and measurement of cellular infiltration,” Biomacromolecules, 7(10): 2796-2805 (2006). |
Pham et al., “Electrospinning of Polymeric Nanofibers for Tissue Engineering Applications: A Review,” Tissue Engineering, 12(5): 1197-1211 (2006). |
Ramakrishna et al., “Electrospun nanofibers: solving global issues,” Materials Today, 9(3): 40-50 (2006). |
Rieger et al., “Designing Electrospun Nanofiber Mats to Promote Wound Healing—A Review,” J. Matererials Chemistiy B, 1(36): 4531-4541 (2013). |
Schneider et al., “Influence of pH on Wound-healing: A New Perspective for Wound-therapy,” Archives of Dermatological Research, 298(9): 413-420 (2007). |
Shin et al., “Electrospun PLGA nanofiber scaffolds for articular cartilage reconstruction: mechanical stability, degradation and cellular responses under mechanical stimulation in vitro,” Journal of Biomaterials Science, Polymer Edition, 17(1-2): 103-119 (2006). |
Shin et al. “Experimental characterization of electrospinning: the electrically forced jet and instabilities,” Polymer, 42(25): 9955-9967 (2001). |
Smith et al., “Suture-reinforced electrospun polydioxanone-elastin small-diameter tubes for use in vascular tissue engineering: a feasibility study,” Acta Biomaterialia 4(1): 58-66 (2008). |
Stitzel, J.D. et al., “Arterial Smooth Muscle Cell Proliferation on a Novel Biomimicking, Biodegradable Vascular Graft Scaffold,” Journal of Biomaterials Applications 16(1): 22-33 (2001). |
Subbiah et al. “Electrospinning of Nanofibers,” J. of Applied Polymer Science, 96(2): 557-569 (2005). |
Tan et al., “Tensile test of a single nanofiber using an atomic force microscope tip,” Applied Physics Letters, 86(7): 073115-1:3 (2004). |
Teo et al., “Electrospun scaffold tailored for tissue-specific extracellular matrix,” Biotechnology Journal, 1(9): 918-929 (2006). |
Thomas et al. “Electrospun bioactive nanocomposite scaffolds of polycaprolactone and nanohydroxyapatite for bone tissue engineering,” Journal of Nanoscience Nanotechnology, 6(2): 487-93 (2006). |
Tormala, et al., “Ultra-High-Strength absorbable self-reinforced polyglycolide (SR-PGA) composite rods for internal fixation of bone fractures: In vitro and in vivo study” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, 25(1): 1-22 (1991). |
Valizadeh et al., “Electrospinning and Electrospun Nanofibres,” IET Nanobiotechnology, 8(2): 83-92 (2014). |
Vaz et al. “Design of scaffold for blood vessel tissue engineering using a multiple-layering electrospinning technique,” Acta Biomaterialia, 1(5): 572-582 (2005). |
Wikipedia, ““Polyhydroxyethylmethacrylate,”” downloaded on Dec. 18, 2019 downloaded from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polyhydroxyethylmethacrylate (3 pages). |
Wikipedia, “Polyhydroxyethylmethacrylate,” downloaded Sep. 9, 2020 from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polyhydroxyethylmethacrylate (2 pages). |
Wise, Histologic proof that acellular dennal matrices (ADM)-Enduragen DermaMalrix and DuraMatrix—are not repopulaled or nonviable and that AlloDerm may be repopulated but degraded synchronoly, Aesthetic Surgery Journal, 32(3): 355-358 (2012). |
Wulkersdorfer et al., “Bimodal Porous Scaffolds by Sequential Electrospinning of Poly (glycolic acid) with Sucrose Particles,” International Journal of Polymer Science 2010: 1-9 (2010). |
Xie et al. “Radially Aligned Electrospun Nanofibers as Dural Substitutes for Wound Closure and Tissue Regeneration Applicalions,” ACS Nano, 4(9): 5027-5036 (2010). |
Xie, et al., “Conductive core-sheath nanofibers and their potential applications in neural tissue engineering,” Adv Funct Mater, 19(14): 2312-2318 (2009). |
Xie et al., “Neurites outgrowth on nanofiber scaffolds with different orders, structures, and surface properties,” ACS Nano, 3(5): 1151-1159 (2009). |
Xie et al., “Putting electrospun nanofibers to work for biomedical research,” Macromol Rapid Commun., 29(22): 1775-1792 (2008). |
Yarin, et al., “Taylor Cone and Jetting from Liquid Driplets in Electrospinning of Nanofibers,” Journal of Applied Physics, 90(9): 4836-4846 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1408260; College of Polymer Science and Polymer Engineering. 85 (2001). https://ideaexchange.uakron.edu/polymer_ideas/85. |
Zerris et al. “Repair of the dura mater with processed collagen devices,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials, 83B(2): 580-588 (2007). |
Zong et al., “Structure and process relationship of electrospun bioabsorbable nanofiber membranes,” Polymer, 43(16): 4403-4412 (2002). |
Australian Examination Report No. 1 issued for Application No. 2012390291 dated May 31, 2017 (4 pages). |
Australian Examination Report issued for Application No. 2011268321, dated Apr. 17, 2015 (4 pages). |
Australian Examination Report No. 1 issued for Application No. 2016406314 dated Oct. 29, 2020 (4 pages). |
Australian Examination Report No. 2 issued for Application No. 2016406314 dated Mar. 12, 2021 (3 pages). |
Australian Examination Report No. 3 issued for Application No. 2016406314 dated Jul. 5, 2021 (4 pages). |
Australian Examination Report No. 1 issued for Application No. 2017232208 dated Jan. 8, 2018 (4 pages). |
Brazilian Technical Report for related Application No. 112012032169-2, dated Feb. 20, 2019 (4 pages). |
Brazilian Technical Report for related Application No. BR112015006301-2, dated Oct. 15, 2020, 5 pages. |
Canadian Examiner's Report issued for Application No. 2,885,682, dated Jun. 4, 2018 (5 pages). |
Chinese Examiner's Report Issued for Application No. 201680087078.9, dated Jan. 20, 2021 with translation (28 pages). |
Chinese Second Office Action Issued for Application No. 201680087078.9, dated Jul. 14, 2021 with translation (23 pages). |
European Extended Search Report issued for Application No. 11796426.2, dated Mar. 27, 2014 (6 pages). |
European Examination Report issued for Application No. 12884789.4 dated Feb. 13, 2018 (5 pages). |
European Partial Search Report issued for Application No. 12884789.4, dated Feb. 29, 2016 (8 pages). |
European Extended Search Report issued for Application No. 12884789.4, dated Jun. 16, 2016 (12 pages). |
European Search Report issued for Application No. 16901840.5, dated Dec. 2, 2019 (15 pages). |
European Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. 18164340, dated May 17, 2019, (5 pages). |
European Search Report and Written Opinion for application No. EP20175280.5, dated Sep. 11, 2020 (8 pages). |
European Office Action issued for Application No. 16901840.5, dated Sep. 10, 2021 (9 pages). |
GCC Examination Report in Application No. 2017-33397, dated Apr. 15, 2019 (4 pages). |
Indian Examination Report issued for Application No. 11141/DELNP/2012, dated Jun. 21, 2018 (7 pages). |
Indian First Examination Report for Application No. 2299/DELNP/2015, dated Oct. 24, 2019, (6 pages) English translation. |
Indian Frist Examination Report issued for Application No. 201817046790, dated Sep. 29, 2021 (6 pages). |
Japanese Office action issued for Application No. 2013-515511, dated Oct. 28, 2014 (1 page). |
Japanese Office translation issued for Application No. 2015-533026, dated Jun. 27, 2017 (4 pages). |
Japanese Office Action Summary issued for Application No. 2015-533026, dated Oct. 18, 2016 (5 pages). |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion issued for Application No. PCT/2012/056548, dated Apr. 26, 2013 (12 pages). |
PCT International Search Report in International Application No. PCT/16/32001, dated Aug. 11, 2016 K1 page). |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion issued for Application No. PCT/2011/040691, dated Feb. 24, 2012 (14 pages). |
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/2011/040691, dated Dec. 19, 2012 (9 pages). |
Singapore Search Report issued for Application No. 201209288.8, dated May 15, 2014 (17 pages). |
Singapore Search and Examination Report for 2012092888, dated Jan. 30, 2015 (8 pages). |
Singapore Examination Report issued for Application No. 11201502207W, dated Jun. 13, 2017 (8 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 62/154,286, filed Apr. 29, 2015, Johnson. |
Declaration of Gary E. Wnek, Ph.D. in Support of Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 10,632,228 dated Jan. 2021. |
Defendants' Initial Invalidity Contentions in Civil Action No. 20-980-CFC-JLH dated Nov. 4, 2021 (618 pages). |
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 10,632,228, dated May 28, 2021 (91 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220249743 A1 | Aug 2022 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14429976 | US | |
Child | 16131887 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 17381792 | Jul 2021 | US |
Child | 17576058 | US | |
Parent | 17229226 | Apr 2021 | US |
Child | 17381792 | US | |
Parent | 16872926 | May 2020 | US |
Child | 17229226 | US | |
Parent | 16540779 | Aug 2019 | US |
Child | 16872926 | US | |
Parent | 16131887 | Sep 2018 | US |
Child | 16540779 | US |