Three-dimensional matrix phased array spot weld inspection system

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9063059
  • Patent Number
    9,063,059
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, May 10, 2012
    12 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, June 23, 2015
    9 years ago
Abstract
A system for characterizing a spot weld including an acoustic probe that further includes a plurality of ultrasonic transducer elements arranged in a curved array, wherein the transducer elements are operative to generate ultrasonic signals and to receive reflections thereof; and a combination of materials for allowing the probe to conform to a contoured surface of the spot weld while enabling sound energy to be transferred directly into the spot weld under test conditions; a phased array excitation unit coupled to the array of transducer elements for ultrasonically exciting transducer elements; and a controller coupled to the phased array excitation unit for controlling the operation of the phased array unit, gathering and processing information from the ultrasonic transducers, and generating a two-dimensional, color coded image that characterizes the integrity of the spot weld.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates generally to inspection systems for use in assessing the performance of industrial manufacturing processes, and more specifically to a nondestructive inspection system for assessing the quality of resistance spot welds.


Sheet metal joining processes are widely used in many industries including the aerospace and automotive industries. Among these processes, resistance spot welding is a very common procedure used to join metal sheets because it has high process speed and is easily adopted in mass production lines. Seam welding, weld bonding, adhesive joining, soldering, and brazing have also gained acceptance. The quality control of such joining processes has been recognized as an important issue to manufacturers. The quality of weld joints is affected by the joining process itself and by the design of the joint. Many factors are considered, including metallurgic reactions, thermal behaviors, chemical composition, starting condition of the base metal, welding and bonding conditions, and the welding and bonding equipment used during the process. Furthermore, the intricate relationship between these factors makes it difficult to control the quality of the weld joint and difficult to inspect the weld joint in a nondestructive manner.


Acoustic methods are commonly used nondestructive testing methods for various inspection applications. Unlike other nondestructive testing methods, acoustic methods provide both surface and internal information. Moreover, acoustic methods allow for deeper penetration into specimens and higher sensitivity to small discontinuities in a weld joint. Acoustic methods, however, do have limitations. The most significant limitations include the requirement of a skillful operator for using the testing device and analyzing acoustic data, as well as the very subjective nature of identifying a stuck or cold weld or inadequate bond, such as a kissing bond. Accordingly, the field of ultrasonic nondestructive evaluation (NDE) is in need of a reliable process or technique for identifying poor quality joints in a manner that eliminates the involvement of a skilled operator and the subjective interpretation of test data.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The following provides a summary of certain exemplary embodiments of the present invention. This summary is not an extensive overview and is not intended to identify key or critical aspects or elements of the present invention or to delineate its scope.


In accordance with one aspect of the present invention, a system for characterizing a spot weld is provided. This system includes an acoustic probe having a plurality of ultrasonic transducer elements arranged in a curved array at one end of the acoustic probe, wherein the transducer elements are operative to both generate ultrasonic signals and to receive reflections thereof; and a combination of materials for allowing the probe to conform to a contoured surface of the spot weld while enabling sound energy to be transferred directly into the spot weld under test conditions. The system also includes a phased array excitation unit in electrical communication with the array of transducer elements for ultrasonically exciting transducer elements; and a controller in electrical communication with the phased array excitation unit for controlling the operation of the phased array unit, gathering and processing information from the ultrasonic transducers, and generating a two-dimensional, color coded image that characterizes the integrity of the spot weld.


In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, a non-destructive test system for characterizing a spot weld is provided. This system includes an acoustic probe, having a plurality of ultrasonic transducer elements arranged in a curved array at one end of the acoustic probe, wherein the transducer elements are operative to both generate ultrasonic signals and to receive reflections thereof; and a combination of materials for allowing the probe to conform to a contoured surface of the spot weld while enabling sound energy to be transferred directly into the spot weld under test conditions, wherein the combination of materials further includes a flexible membrane mounted on the end of the probe and a fluid filled chamber or solid sound delay material disposed between the membrane and the array. The system also includes a phased array excitation unit in electrical communication with the array of transducer elements for ultrasonically exciting the transducer elements; and a computerized controller in electrical communication with the phased array excitation unit for controlling the operation of the phased array unit, gathering and processing information from the ultrasonic transducers, and generating a two-dimensional, color coded image that characterizes the integrity of the spot weld.


In yet another aspect of this invention, an alternate a non-destructive test system for characterizing a spot weld is provided. This system includes an acoustic probe having a plurality of ultrasonic transducer elements arranged in a curved array at one end of the acoustic probe, wherein the transducer elements are operative to both generate ultrasonic signals and to receive reflections thereof, wherein the transducer elements are further arranged into discrete subgroups, and wherein each subgroup may be activated independently of the other subgroups; and a combination of materials for allowing the probe to conform to a contoured surface of the spot weld while enabling sound energy to be transferred directly into the spot weld under test conditions, wherein the combination of materials further includes a flexible membrane mounted on the end of the probe and a fluid filled chamber or solid sound delay material disposed between the membrane and the array. The system also includes a phased array excitation unit in electrical communication with the array of transducer elements for ultrasonically exciting the transducer elements; and a computerized controller in electrical communication with the phased array excitation unit for controlling the operation of the phased array unit, gathering and processing information from the ultrasonic transducers, and generating a two-dimensional, color coded image that characterizes the integrity of the spot weld.


Additional features and aspects of the present invention will become apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art upon reading and understanding the following detailed description of the exemplary embodiments. As will be appreciated by the skilled artisan, further embodiments of the invention are possible without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention. Accordingly, the drawings and associated descriptions are to be regarded as illustrative and not restrictive in nature.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated into and form a part of the specification, schematically illustrate one or more exemplary embodiments of the invention and, together with the general description given above and detailed description given below, serve to explain the principles of the invention, and wherein:



FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing the primary components of a three-dimensional matrix phased array spot weld inspection system in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention;



FIGS. 2
a-c provide illustrations of test results derived from analyzing a good spot weld using the system of FIG. 1;



FIG. 3 provides a visual representation in A-scan mode of the electronic gates included in the weld inspection system of FIG. 1;



FIGS. 4
a-c provide illustrations of test results derived from analyzing a poor spot weld using the system of FIG. 1;



FIGS. 5
a-b provide illustrations of test results derived from analyzing a stuck weld using the system of FIG. 1;



FIGS. 6
a-b illustrate the shape of the 3-D curved probe element as well as various firing sequences for the sub-element groups;



FIGS. 7
a-d provide modeling verification of the benefits of a 3-D curved probe design versus a 2-D flat probe design;



FIG. 8 provides a data flow chart for an exemplary embodiment of the spot weld inspection process of the present invention; and



FIG. 9 provides examples of imaging results for various spot weld conditions.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Exemplary embodiments of the present invention are now described with reference to the Figures. Reference numerals are used throughout the detailed description to refer to the various elements and structures. In other instances, well-known structures and devices are shown in block diagram form for purposes of simplifying the description. Although the following detailed description contains many specifics for the purposes of illustration, a person of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that many variations and alterations to the following details are within the scope of the invention. Accordingly, the following embodiments of the invention are set forth without any loss of generality to, and without imposing limitations upon, the claimed invention.


The present application incorporates by reference herein U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/186,047, in its entirety for all purposes. With regard to the nomenclature used herein, the present invention is described as being useful for analyzing the integrity of a resistance spot weld between a first and second workpiece or upper and lower sheets of metal. However, this invention is applicable to all welds regardless of material, configuration, or the number of workpieces, as well as adhesive bonds. Thus, while the present disclosure generally refers to a stuck weld, one skilled in the art will appreciate that the present invention detects stuck portions of joints, which are often referred to as kissing bonds or weak bonds in the field of adhesives. This invention is also applicable to metals and nonmetals alike and is not limited to fusion welding, but may also be used to examine solid state welds, brazed and soldered joints. Thus, while this method has particular application in the automated analysis of spot welds, it may also be used to evaluate continuous bonds.


A stuck weld or stuck joint occurs when workpieces (e.g., pieces of sheet metal) are held together by localized fusion at the welding interface, but no weld button or weld nugget has formed as a result of the welding process. A stuck weld typically results from heat at the welding interface being insufficient to create nugget growth. In the absence of a properly formed weld nugget, fusion may occur at certain points of contact between the sheets of metal. With coated materials, coatings can melt and refreeze, effectively soldering the parts together. The resulting bonds are often strong enough to hold the workpieces together under light loads, but reasonable force will pull them apart. If ultrasonic testing is used to analyze weld integrity, transmitted ultrasonic beams (i.e., sound waves) will not pass through the interface between sheets if no fusion has occurred. If a stuck weld as occurred, resulting in fusion, but no weld nugget, transmitted ultrasonic beams will pass partially though the sheet interface. If a weld nugget has been properly formed, transmitted ultrasonic beams will pass completely through the sheet interface.


Phased Array Ultrasonic Testing (PAUT) may be used for flaw detection, sizing, and imaging. PAUT technology is the ability to modify electronically the acoustic probe characteristics. Probe modifications are performed by introducing time shifts in the signals sent to (pulse) and received from (echo) individual elements of an array probe. Three common formats for collecting and displaying ultrasonic data for purposes of non-destructive evaluation are A-scan, B-scan and C-scan presentations. Each presentation mode provides a means for visualizing and evaluating the region of material being inspected. An A-scan is a simple RF waveform presentation showing the time and amplitude of an ultrasonic signal, as commonly provided by conventional ultrasonic flaw detectors and waveform display thickness gages. A-scan is an amplitude modulation scan, and as generally applied to pulse echo ultrasonics, horizontal and vertical sweeps are proportional to time or distance and amplitude or magnitude respectively. Thus the location and magnitude of acoustical interface are indicated as to depth below the transducer. The relative amount of energy received is plotted along the vertical axis and the elapsed time (which may be related to the sound energy travel time within the material) is displayed along the horizontal axis. Most instruments utilizing an A-scan display allow the signal to be displayed in its natural radio frequency form (RF) as a fully rectified RF signal or as either the positive or negative half of the RF signal. In the A-scan presentation, relative discontinuity size can be estimated by comparing the signal amplitude obtained from an unknown reflector to that from a known reflector. Reflector depth can be determined by the position of the signal on the horizontal sweep. A C-scan from a phased array system involves an ultrasonic probe being physically moved along one axis while the beam electronically scans along the other axis according to the focal law sequence. Signal amplitude or depth data is collected within gated regions of interest. Data is plotted with each focal law progression, using the programmed beam aperture. Utilizing a matrix phased array probe, beam steering can be accomplished in multiple directions.


With reference to the Figures, an exemplary embodiment of the present invention provides a nondestructive inspection system for assessing the quality of resistance spot welds. As shown in FIG. 1, which is a block diagram of an exemplary embodiment, spot weld inspection system 10, is operative to assess the quality of weld 12, which is formed at interface 14, which is located between upper sheet 16 and lower sheet 18 (both having a sheet thickness of about 0.6 mm to about 2.0 mm). An air gap of about 0.1 mm to about 0.5 mm may be present between upper sheet 16 and lower sheet 18. A three-dimensional, matrix phased array probe 100 is placed on the region of upper sheet 16 that is located over the welded area. A curved array of ultrasonic elements 106 is used to transmit a plurality of ultrasonic beams 108 into the welded area and to capture the associated reflections 110 of those ultrasonic beams. Phased array unit 200 is in electrical communication with the plurality of ultrasonic elements 102 through a plurality of signal pathways 202. Phased array unit 200 is also in electrical communication with computer 300, which processes incoming ultrasonic data and generates a visual representation of the welded area. Probe 100 includes flexible membrane 102, which allows the tip of the probe to conform to the contour of the welded area and fluid filled chamber 104 or solid sound delay material for focusing and steering ultrasonic beams 108. Because flexible membrane 102 is capable of conforming to curved surfaces as shown in FIG. 1, and because the array of transducer elements 106 is configured in a curved geometry (see FIG. 1), the matrix phased array system of this invention is referred to as “three-dimensional” as opposed a “two-dimensional” system which uses a probe having a flattened array and a flat tip.



FIGS. 2
a-c provide illustrations of test results derived from analyzing a good spot weld using system 10. In FIG. 2a, ultrasonic beams travel completely through weld 12 and interface 14 and reflect back to probe 100 from the backside of lower sheet 18. FIG. 2b illustrates diagrammatically the direction and relative strength of each sound wave as it transmits and reflects at interface 14. In FIG. 2b, a thinner line represents loss of acoustic energy as the sound wave interacts with interface 14. The reflected signals designated as circled 1, 2, and 3 correspond to the peaks shown in the A-scan presented in FIG. 2c. FIG. 2c provides the signals derived from testing in A-scan mode, wherein signal 1 represents the reflection from the top surface of upper sheet 16, signal 2 represents the first full back reflection, and signal 3 represents the second full back reflection. The horizontal line drawn through signal 2 represents a surface gate and the horizontal line adjacent to signal 2 represents an interface gate (see discussion below.)


Based on the ultrasonic energy transmission and reflection at weld interface 14 and the back side of lower sheet 18, system 10 uses two adjustable electronic gates to filter out all unwanted reflected signals. The two signals that pass through the gates are either the reflected signal from the back side of the second sheet of metal or the reflected signal from the interface of the two sheet metals. The first gate is called the “surface gate” and the second gate is called the “interface gate”. This approach differs from the current commercially available systems that utilize an attenuation coefficient compensation method. In such systems, multiple reflections from all of surfaces and the interface are taken into account to determine attenuation coefficients and make a correction for acoustic energy loss caused by the spot weld fusion, assuming that the microstructure of fused section of the spot weld has a higher attenuation coefficient compared to a stuck weld condition. As disclosed and claimed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/186,047, which is incorporated by reference herein, each ultrasonic element in array 106 generates a primary ultrasonic beam and a secondary ultrasonic beam wherein the primary ultrasonic beam is high gain and wherein the secondary ultrasonic beam is low gain; and wherein the primary and secondary ultrasonic beams are fired in within very close proximity to one another (i.e., milliseconds). As shown in FIG. 4, channel 2 is a low amplitude duplicate of channel 1 in each peak. The initial time interval shown is measured from the center of the first peak to the surface gate start position. The surface gate start position is locked to the first peak of channel 2 plus the initial time interval. The interface gate start position is locked to the surface gate start position. System 10 measures the ration of signal amplitude (height) between gate A and B and only signals between the gate start and end positions are considered.



FIGS. 4
a-c provide illustrations of test results derived from analyzing a poor spot weld using system 10. In FIG. 4a, because no weld nugget exists, ultrasonic beams do not travel completely through interface 14, but rather reflect back to probe 100 from interface 14. FIG. 4b illustrates diagrammatically the direction and relative strength of each sound wave as it reflects at interface 14. In FIG. 4b, a thinner line represents loss of acoustic energy as the sound wave interacts with interface 14. The reflected signals designated as circled 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 correspond to the peaks shown in the A-scan presented in FIG. 4c. FIG. 4c provides the signals derived from testing in A-scan mode, wherein signal 1 represents the first reflection from the top surface of upper sheet 16, signal 2 represents the first reflection from interface 14, signal 3 represents the second reflection from interface 14, signal 4 represents the third reflection from interface 14, and signal 5 represents the fourth reflection from interface 14. The horizontal line drawn through signal 3 represents the surface gate and the horizontal line drawn though signal 4 represents the interface gate (see discussion above.)



FIGS. 5
a-b provide illustrations of test results derived from analyzing a stuck weld using system 10. Because an incomplete or poorly formed weld exists, ultrasonic beams travel only partially through interface 14, while intermediate echoes appear between the echoes of interface 14 and full back wall reflection. FIG. 5a illustrates diagrammatically the direction and relative strength of each sound wave as it transmits and reflects at interface 14. In FIG. 5a, a thinner line represents loss of acoustic energy as the sound wave interacts with interface 14. The reflected signals designated as circled 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 correspond to the peaks shown in the A-scan presented in FIG. 5b. FIG. 5b provides the signals derived from testing in A-scan mode, wherein signal 2 represents the first reflection from interface 14, signal 3 represents the first full back reflection, signal 4 represents the second reflection from interface 14, and signal 5 represents the second full back reflection. The horizontal line drawn through signal 3 represents the surface gate and the horizontal line drawn though signal 4 represents the interface gate (see discussion above.)



FIGS. 6
a-b illustrate the geometry of the curved three-dimensional probe element (FIG. 6a) as well as various firing sequences for the sub-element groups (FIG. 6b). Acoustic probe 100 includes a plurality of ultrasonic transducer elements 106 arranged in a three-dimensional array and having a combination of materials for allowing the probe to conform to the contoured surface of a spot weld while enabling the sound energy to be transferred directly into the spot weld under test. An excitation element (phased array unit 200) is coupled to the array and a subset group of transducer elements are combined to send an ultrasonic beam toward a spot weld. Each transducer element in a subset group may be pulsed at different time intervals (phase delay) and their individual waves summed to produce a focusing effect of the beam as well as a steering effect. Other three-dimensional arrangements are possible for optimizing the performance for specific applications. The total number of elements, overall dimension, and operating frequency determine the overall three-dimensional surface contour shape and its operating characteristics and parameters.


The design of the three-dimensional probe permits inspection of a larger physical area with a smaller probe, thereby allowing for improved probe access as well as a wider coverage area compared to two-dimensional designs. The three-dimensional geometrical arrangement provides optimized accuracy and sensitivity in particular regions of the weld joint. As illustrated by FIGS. 7a-d, the result of corner elements of the three-dimensional curved probe shown in FIG. 7a illustrates that the beam launch angle is more steered to the normal direction of the typical spot weld indentation when compared to the two-dimensional flat probe case shown in FIG. 7c. There is no noticeable change in the beam quality for the center elements for both three-dimensional (FIG. 7b) and two-dimensional (FIG. 7d) probes. Without losing the high fidelity of inspection capability with the two-dimensional matrix phased array probe, the three-dimensional probe extends the coverage area from the built-in curvature of the probe itself. This invention therefore allows inspection of a larger weld area with a smaller probe diameter, allowing improved access. It may also allow use of fewer numbers of elements, reducing overall system cost, while still covering the entire weld area.


In various embodiments of this invention, a computerized controller is coupled to acoustic probe 100 and transducer elements 106 for directing transmission of the ultrasonic signals and for summing and receiving responses therefrom. With general reference to FIG. 8 (which provides a flowchart that illustrates the function of one possible operating system), the controller is operative to (i) generate and acquire acoustic signals; (ii) detect the surface of the spot weld for each element grouping; (iii) adjust instrument gating to compensate for surface profile and differences in probe orientation; (iv) measure the signal amplitude ratio between responses reflected from the un-bonded areas and areas with good bond; (v) recognize a subset of the responses as being reflected from the un-bonded areas associated with the spot weld and to separate the subset from a remainder of the responses; (vi) measure the extent of the non-delamination dimensions; and (vii) present a two-dimensional color coded image of non-delamination of the spot weld (see FIG. 9).


In summary, some of the distinct advantages of this invention include: (i) a three-dimensional matrix probe element; (ii) a phase delay with sub-element group to form a beam focusing and steering capability; (iii) conformable membrane (no need for an attenuation correction); and (iv) an image process utilizing electronic gates to filter out unwanted reflections. While the present invention has been illustrated by the description of exemplary embodiments thereof, and while the embodiments have been described in certain detail, it is not the intention of the Applicant to restrict or in any way limit the scope of the appended claims to such detail. Additional advantages and modifications will readily appear to those skilled in the art. Therefore, the invention in its broader aspects is not limited to any of the specific details, representative devices and methods, and/or illustrative examples shown and described. Accordingly, departures may be made from such details without departing from the spirit or scope of the applicant's general inventive concept.

Claims
  • 1. A system for characterizing a spot weld, comprising: (a) an acoustic probe, wherein the acoustic probe further includes: (i) a plurality of ultrasonic transducer elements arranged in a curved array at one end of the acoustic probe, wherein the transducer elements are operative to both generate ultrasonic signals and to receive reflections thereof; and(ii) a combination of materials for allowing the probe to conform to a contoured surface of the spot weld while enabling sound energy to be transferred directly into the spot weld under test conditions,(b) a phased array excitation unit in electrical communication with the array of transducer elements for ultrasonically exciting transducer elements, and(c) a controller in electrical communication with the phased array excitation unit for controlling the operation of the phased array unit, gathering and processing information from the ultrasonic transducers, and generating a two-dimensional, color coded image that characterizes the integrity of the spot weld.
  • 2. The system of claim 1, further comprises at least two sheets of material that have been joined together by resistance welding, and wherein the resistance welding has generated at least one spot weld.
  • 3. The system of claim 1, wherein the combination of materials further includes a flexible membrane mounted on the end of the probe and a fluid filled chamber or solid sound delay material disposed between the membrane and the array.
  • 4. The system of claim 1, wherein the transducer elements are further arranged into discrete subgroups, and wherein each subgroup may be activated independently of the other subgroups and at different time intervals.
  • 5. The system of claim 4, wherein activating each subgroup independently of the other subgroups and at different time intervals for each element in the subgroup provides signal focusing and steering capability.
  • 6. The system of claim 4, where in the controller is further operative to detect the surface of a spot weld for each element subgroup; adjust instrument gating to compensate for surface profile and differences in probe orientation; measure the signal amplitude ratio between responses reflected from the unbonded areas and areas with good bond: recognize a subset of the responses as being reflected from the unbonded areas associated with the spot weld and to separate the subset from a remainder of the responses: and measure the extent of the non-delamination dimensions.
  • 7. The system of claim 1, where in the controller is a computer.
  • 8. A non-destructive test system for characterizing a spot weld, comprising: (a) an acoustic probe, wherein the acoustic probe further includes: (i) a plurality of ultrasonic transducer elements arranged in a curved array at one end of the acoustic probe, wherein the transducer elements are operative to both generate ultrasonic signals and to receive reflections thereof; and(ii) a combination of materials for allowing the probe to conform to a contoured surface of the spot weld while enabling sound energy to be transferred directly into the spot weld under test conditions, wherein the combination of materials further includes a flexible membrane mounted on the end of the probe and a fluid filled chamber or solid sound delay material disposed between the membrane and the array; and(b) a phased array excitation unit in electrical communication with the array of transducer elements for ultrasonically exciting the transducer elements; and(c) a computerized controller in electrical communication with the phased array excitation unit for controlling the operation of the phased array unit, gathering and processing information from the ultrasonic transducers, and generating a two-dimensional, color coded image that characterizes the integrity of the spot weld.
  • 9. The system of claim 8, further comprises at least two sheets of material that have been joined together by resistance welding, and wherein the resistance welding has generated at least one spot weld.
  • 10. The system of claim 9, wherein activating each subgroup independently of the other subgroups and at different time intervals for each element in the subgroup provides signal focusing and steering capability.
  • 11. The system of claim 9, where in the controller is further operative to detect the surface of a spot weld for each element subgroup; adjust instrument gating to compensate for surface profile and differences in probe orientation; measure the signal amplitude ratio between responses reflected from the unbonded areas and areas with good bond; recognize a subset of the responses as being reflected from the unbonded areas associated with the spot weld and to separate the subset from a remainder of the responses; and measure the extent of the non-delamination dimensions.
  • 12. The system of claim 8, wherein the transducer elements are further arranged into discrete subgroups, and wherein each subgroup may be activated independently of the other subgroups and at different time intervals.
  • 13. A non-destructive test system for characterizing a spot weld, comprising: (a) an acoustic probe, wherein the acoustic probe further includes: (i) a plurality of ultrasonic transducer elements arranged in a curved array at one end of the acoustic probe, wherein the transducer elements are operative to both generate ultrasonic signals and to receive reflections thereof, wherein the transducer elements are further arranged into discrete subgroups, and wherein each subgroup may be activated independently of the other subgroups; and(ii) a combination of materials for allowing the probe to conform to a contoured surface of the spot weld while enabling sound energy to be transferred directly into the spot weld under test conditions, wherein the combination of materials further includes a flexible membrane mounted on the end of the probe and a fluid filled chamber or solid sound delay material disposed between the membrane and the array; and(b) a phased array excitation unit in electrical communication with the array of transducer elements for ultrasonically exciting the transducer elements; and(c) a computerized controller in electrical communication with the phased array excitation unit for controlling the operation of the phased array unit, gathering and processing information from the ultrasonic transducers, and generating a two-dimensional, color coded image that characterizes the integrity of the spot weld.
  • 14. The system of claim 13, further comprises at least two sheets of material that have been joined together by resistance welding, and wherein the resistance welding has generated at least one spot weld.
  • 15. The system of claim 13, wherein the transducer elements are further arranged into discrete subgroups, and wherein each subgroup may be activated independently of the other subgroups and at different time intervals.
  • 16. The system of claim 15, wherein activating each subgroup independently of the other subgroups and at different time intervals for each element in the subgroup provides signal focusing and steering capability.
  • 17. The system of claim 15, where in the controller is further operative to detect the surface of a spot weld for each element subgroup; adjust instrument gating to compensate for surface profile and differences in probe orientation; measure the signal amplitude ratio between responses reflected from the unbonded areas and areas with good bond; recognize a subset of the responses as being reflected from the unhonded areas associated with the spot weld and to separate the subset from a remainder of the responses; and measure the extent of the non-delamination dimensions.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This patent application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/484,312 filed on May 10, 2011 and entitled “Three-Dimensional Matrix Phased Array Spot Weld Inspection System”, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety and made part of the present U.S. utility patent application for all purposes.

US Referenced Citations (123)
Number Name Date Kind
3895685 Gillette et al. Jul 1975 A
3978714 Shraiber et al. Sep 1976 A
4274289 Weiss et al. Jun 1981 A
4327738 Green et al. May 1982 A
4344159 Ballinger Aug 1982 A
4442715 Brisken et al. Apr 1984 A
4534221 Fife et al. Aug 1985 A
4631710 Yamaguchi et al. Dec 1986 A
4642215 Klinvex et al. Feb 1987 A
4744250 Ganglbauer et al. May 1988 A
4770699 Mountford Sep 1988 A
4836026 P'An et al. Jun 1989 A
4865040 Ogasawara Sep 1989 A
4886069 O'Donnell Dec 1989 A
5030911 Lam Jul 1991 A
5063780 Landry et al. Nov 1991 A
5121364 O'Donnell Jun 1992 A
5142649 O'Donnell Aug 1992 A
5278757 Hoctor et al. Jan 1994 A
5282471 Sato Feb 1994 A
5299577 Brown et al. Apr 1994 A
5331964 Trahey et al. Jul 1994 A
5351543 Migliori et al. Oct 1994 A
5473943 Schoenen et al. Dec 1995 A
5487306 Fortes Jan 1996 A
5513532 Beffy et al. May 1996 A
5531117 Fortes Jul 1996 A
5549111 Wright et al. Aug 1996 A
5677490 Gunther et al. Oct 1997 A
5750895 Chern et al. May 1998 A
5777891 Pagano et al. Jul 1998 A
5797844 Yoshioka et al. Aug 1998 A
5797847 Miller et al. Aug 1998 A
6055862 Martens May 2000 A
6072144 Perryman et al. Jun 2000 A
6250163 MacLauchlan et al. Jun 2001 B1
6254542 Hamilton et al. Jul 2001 B1
6279397 Dwyer Aug 2001 B1
6332011 Johnson Dec 2001 B1
6344739 Hardy et al. Feb 2002 B1
6484584 Johnson et al. Nov 2002 B2
6532820 Fleming et al. Mar 2003 B1
6640632 Hatanaka et al. Nov 2003 B1
6676603 Aichhorn et al. Jan 2004 B2
6725721 Venczel Apr 2004 B2
6732587 Lorraine et al. May 2004 B2
6813950 Glascock et al. Nov 2004 B2
6857553 Hartman et al. Feb 2005 B1
6865243 Paillaman et al. Mar 2005 B2
6911008 Pelissier et al. Jun 2005 B2
6920791 Wagner et al. Jul 2005 B2
6925882 Fleming et al. Aug 2005 B1
6931931 Graff et al. Aug 2005 B2
6945937 Culp et al. Sep 2005 B2
6948369 Fleming et al. Sep 2005 B2
6957583 Tooma et al. Oct 2005 B2
7021143 Dasch Apr 2006 B2
7132617 Lee et al. Nov 2006 B2
7210329 Buschke et May 2007 B2
7234355 Dewangan et al. Jun 2007 B2
7240556 Georgeson et al. Jul 2007 B2
7389693 Reed et al. Jun 2008 B2
7428842 Fair et al. Sep 2008 B2
7516022 Lee et al. Apr 2009 B2
7650790 Wright Jan 2010 B2
7694566 Kleinert Apr 2010 B2
7698944 Takada Apr 2010 B2
7735369 Young et al. Jun 2010 B2
7757557 Thomas et al. Jul 2010 B2
7779693 Orth et al. Aug 2010 B2
7779694 Iizuka Aug 2010 B2
7784347 Messer et al. Aug 2010 B2
7784348 Dubois et al. Aug 2010 B2
7789286 Maev et al. Sep 2010 B2
7926349 Sargent Apr 2011 B2
7984651 Randall et al. Jul 2011 B2
8076824 Sawada et al. Dec 2011 B2
8079263 Randall et al. Dec 2011 B2
8164982 Okuda et al. Apr 2012 B2
8166822 Urbano et al. May 2012 B1
8220334 Klessel et al. Jul 2012 B2
8365584 Quinones et al. Feb 2013 B1
8485036 Crumpton et al. Jul 2013 B2
8499634 Urbano et al. Aug 2013 B2
8499635 Klessel et al. Aug 2013 B2
8521446 Zhang et al. Aug 2013 B2
8544714 Obaditch et al. Oct 2013 B1
8554328 Faraji et al. Oct 2013 B2
8600299 Randall et al. Dec 2013 B2
8616062 Kono et al. Dec 2013 B2
8649185 Wodnicki et al. Feb 2014 B2
8656783 Randall et al. Feb 2014 B2
8689850 Hull Apr 2014 B2
8695429 Urbano et al. Apr 2014 B2
8746070 Tippit, Jr. et al. Jun 2014 B2
20040020298 Siverling et al. Feb 2004 A1
20050132809 Fleming et al. Jun 2005 A1
20080114253 Randall et al. May 2008 A1
20080196504 Johnson et al. Aug 2008 A1
20090007678 Fukutomi et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090133501 Georgeson May 2009 A1
20090255341 Zimmerman et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090320598 Puchner et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100224000 Komatsu et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100286527 Cannon et al. Nov 2010 A1
20110120223 MacLauchlan et al. May 2011 A1
20120034044 Sloan Feb 2012 A1
20120065937 de Graff et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120091185 Ume et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120167690 Yamano Jul 2012 A1
20120243771 Matsumoto et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120272739 Both et al. Nov 2012 A1
20130167646 Frederick et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130181574 Chaggares et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130194891 Kristoffersen et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130228560 Ume et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130255384 Putsherry et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130308419 Singh et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130312528 Feydo Nov 2013 A1
20130315035 Tai Nov 2013 A1
20130319120 Fetzer et al. Dec 2013 A1
20130338941 Lin et al. Dec 2013 A1
20140107534 Du et al. Apr 2014 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (10)
Number Date Country
2006071656 Jul 2006 WO
2007068979 Jun 2007 WO
2010097269 Sep 2010 WO
2012058473 May 2012 WO
2012103628 Aug 2012 WO
2012167380 Dec 2012 WO
2013044350 Apr 2013 WO
2014062467 Apr 2014 WO
2014081721 May 2014 WO
2014100217 Jun 2014 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (4)
Entry
Dr. Michael D. C. Moles et al., Introduction to Phased Array Ultrasonic Technology Applications, 2004, pp. 6-18, R/D Tech, Inc., Canada.
Moles et al., “Pipeline Girth Weld Inspections using Ultrasonic Phased Arrays,” Pan-American Conference for Nondestructive Testing, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil, Jun. 6, 2003, entire document.
International Search Report and Written Opinion received in PCT/US2009/049428, mailed Aug. 31, 2009.
International Search Report and Written Opinion received in PCT/US2012/037322, mailed Aug. 27, 2012.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20120310551 A1 Dec 2012 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61484312 May 2011 US