The present invention relates generally to inspection systems for use in assessing the performance of industrial manufacturing processes, and more specifically to a nondestructive inspection system for assessing the quality of resistance spot welds.
Sheet metal joining processes are widely used in many industries including the aerospace and automotive industries. Among these processes, resistance spot welding is a very common procedure used to join metal sheets because it has high process speed and is easily adopted in mass production lines. Seam welding, weld bonding, adhesive joining, soldering, and brazing have also gained acceptance. The quality control of such joining processes has been recognized as an important issue to manufacturers. The quality of weld joints is affected by the joining process itself and by the design of the joint. Many factors are considered, including metallurgic reactions, thermal behaviors, chemical composition, starting condition of the base metal, welding and bonding conditions, and the welding and bonding equipment used during the process. Furthermore, the intricate relationship between these factors makes it difficult to control the quality of the weld joint and difficult to inspect the weld joint in a nondestructive manner.
Acoustic methods are commonly used nondestructive testing methods for various inspection applications. Unlike other nondestructive testing methods, acoustic methods provide both surface and internal information. Moreover, acoustic methods allow for deeper penetration into specimens and higher sensitivity to small discontinuities in a weld joint. Acoustic methods, however, do have limitations. The most significant limitations include the requirement of a skillful operator for using the testing device and analyzing acoustic data, as well as the very subjective nature of identifying a stuck or cold weld or inadequate bond, such as a kissing bond. Accordingly, the field of ultrasonic nondestructive evaluation (NDE) is in need of a reliable process or technique for identifying poor quality joints in a manner that eliminates the involvement of a skilled operator and the subjective interpretation of test data.
The following provides a summary of certain exemplary embodiments of the present invention. This summary is not an extensive overview and is not intended to identify key or critical aspects or elements of the present invention or to delineate its scope.
In accordance with one aspect of the present invention, a system for characterizing a spot weld is provided. This system includes an acoustic probe having a plurality of ultrasonic transducer elements arranged in a curved array at one end of the acoustic probe, wherein the transducer elements are operative to both generate ultrasonic signals and to receive reflections thereof; and a combination of materials for allowing the probe to conform to a contoured surface of the spot weld while enabling sound energy to be transferred directly into the spot weld under test conditions. The system also includes a phased array excitation unit in electrical communication with the array of transducer elements for ultrasonically exciting transducer elements; and a controller in electrical communication with the phased array excitation unit for controlling the operation of the phased array unit, gathering and processing information from the ultrasonic transducers, and generating a two-dimensional, color coded image that characterizes the integrity of the spot weld.
In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, a non-destructive test system for characterizing a spot weld is provided. This system includes an acoustic probe, having a plurality of ultrasonic transducer elements arranged in a curved array at one end of the acoustic probe, wherein the transducer elements are operative to both generate ultrasonic signals and to receive reflections thereof; and a combination of materials for allowing the probe to conform to a contoured surface of the spot weld while enabling sound energy to be transferred directly into the spot weld under test conditions, wherein the combination of materials further includes a flexible membrane mounted on the end of the probe and a fluid filled chamber or solid sound delay material disposed between the membrane and the array. The system also includes a phased array excitation unit in electrical communication with the array of transducer elements for ultrasonically exciting the transducer elements; and a computerized controller in electrical communication with the phased array excitation unit for controlling the operation of the phased array unit, gathering and processing information from the ultrasonic transducers, and generating a two-dimensional, color coded image that characterizes the integrity of the spot weld.
In yet another aspect of this invention, an alternate a non-destructive test system for characterizing a spot weld is provided. This system includes an acoustic probe having a plurality of ultrasonic transducer elements arranged in a curved array at one end of the acoustic probe, wherein the transducer elements are operative to both generate ultrasonic signals and to receive reflections thereof, wherein the transducer elements are further arranged into discrete subgroups, and wherein each subgroup may be activated independently of the other subgroups; and a combination of materials for allowing the probe to conform to a contoured surface of the spot weld while enabling sound energy to be transferred directly into the spot weld under test conditions, wherein the combination of materials further includes a flexible membrane mounted on the end of the probe and a fluid filled chamber or solid sound delay material disposed between the membrane and the array. The system also includes a phased array excitation unit in electrical communication with the array of transducer elements for ultrasonically exciting the transducer elements; and a computerized controller in electrical communication with the phased array excitation unit for controlling the operation of the phased array unit, gathering and processing information from the ultrasonic transducers, and generating a two-dimensional, color coded image that characterizes the integrity of the spot weld.
Additional features and aspects of the present invention will become apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art upon reading and understanding the following detailed description of the exemplary embodiments. As will be appreciated by the skilled artisan, further embodiments of the invention are possible without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention. Accordingly, the drawings and associated descriptions are to be regarded as illustrative and not restrictive in nature.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated into and form a part of the specification, schematically illustrate one or more exemplary embodiments of the invention and, together with the general description given above and detailed description given below, serve to explain the principles of the invention, and wherein:
a-c provide illustrations of test results derived from analyzing a good spot weld using the system of
a-c provide illustrations of test results derived from analyzing a poor spot weld using the system of
a-b provide illustrations of test results derived from analyzing a stuck weld using the system of
a-b illustrate the shape of the 3-D curved probe element as well as various firing sequences for the sub-element groups;
a-d provide modeling verification of the benefits of a 3-D curved probe design versus a 2-D flat probe design;
Exemplary embodiments of the present invention are now described with reference to the Figures. Reference numerals are used throughout the detailed description to refer to the various elements and structures. In other instances, well-known structures and devices are shown in block diagram form for purposes of simplifying the description. Although the following detailed description contains many specifics for the purposes of illustration, a person of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that many variations and alterations to the following details are within the scope of the invention. Accordingly, the following embodiments of the invention are set forth without any loss of generality to, and without imposing limitations upon, the claimed invention.
The present application incorporates by reference herein U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/186,047, in its entirety for all purposes. With regard to the nomenclature used herein, the present invention is described as being useful for analyzing the integrity of a resistance spot weld between a first and second workpiece or upper and lower sheets of metal. However, this invention is applicable to all welds regardless of material, configuration, or the number of workpieces, as well as adhesive bonds. Thus, while the present disclosure generally refers to a stuck weld, one skilled in the art will appreciate that the present invention detects stuck portions of joints, which are often referred to as kissing bonds or weak bonds in the field of adhesives. This invention is also applicable to metals and nonmetals alike and is not limited to fusion welding, but may also be used to examine solid state welds, brazed and soldered joints. Thus, while this method has particular application in the automated analysis of spot welds, it may also be used to evaluate continuous bonds.
A stuck weld or stuck joint occurs when workpieces (e.g., pieces of sheet metal) are held together by localized fusion at the welding interface, but no weld button or weld nugget has formed as a result of the welding process. A stuck weld typically results from heat at the welding interface being insufficient to create nugget growth. In the absence of a properly formed weld nugget, fusion may occur at certain points of contact between the sheets of metal. With coated materials, coatings can melt and refreeze, effectively soldering the parts together. The resulting bonds are often strong enough to hold the workpieces together under light loads, but reasonable force will pull them apart. If ultrasonic testing is used to analyze weld integrity, transmitted ultrasonic beams (i.e., sound waves) will not pass through the interface between sheets if no fusion has occurred. If a stuck weld as occurred, resulting in fusion, but no weld nugget, transmitted ultrasonic beams will pass partially though the sheet interface. If a weld nugget has been properly formed, transmitted ultrasonic beams will pass completely through the sheet interface.
Phased Array Ultrasonic Testing (PAUT) may be used for flaw detection, sizing, and imaging. PAUT technology is the ability to modify electronically the acoustic probe characteristics. Probe modifications are performed by introducing time shifts in the signals sent to (pulse) and received from (echo) individual elements of an array probe. Three common formats for collecting and displaying ultrasonic data for purposes of non-destructive evaluation are A-scan, B-scan and C-scan presentations. Each presentation mode provides a means for visualizing and evaluating the region of material being inspected. An A-scan is a simple RF waveform presentation showing the time and amplitude of an ultrasonic signal, as commonly provided by conventional ultrasonic flaw detectors and waveform display thickness gages. A-scan is an amplitude modulation scan, and as generally applied to pulse echo ultrasonics, horizontal and vertical sweeps are proportional to time or distance and amplitude or magnitude respectively. Thus the location and magnitude of acoustical interface are indicated as to depth below the transducer. The relative amount of energy received is plotted along the vertical axis and the elapsed time (which may be related to the sound energy travel time within the material) is displayed along the horizontal axis. Most instruments utilizing an A-scan display allow the signal to be displayed in its natural radio frequency form (RF) as a fully rectified RF signal or as either the positive or negative half of the RF signal. In the A-scan presentation, relative discontinuity size can be estimated by comparing the signal amplitude obtained from an unknown reflector to that from a known reflector. Reflector depth can be determined by the position of the signal on the horizontal sweep. A C-scan from a phased array system involves an ultrasonic probe being physically moved along one axis while the beam electronically scans along the other axis according to the focal law sequence. Signal amplitude or depth data is collected within gated regions of interest. Data is plotted with each focal law progression, using the programmed beam aperture. Utilizing a matrix phased array probe, beam steering can be accomplished in multiple directions.
With reference to the Figures, an exemplary embodiment of the present invention provides a nondestructive inspection system for assessing the quality of resistance spot welds. As shown in
a-c provide illustrations of test results derived from analyzing a good spot weld using system 10. In
Based on the ultrasonic energy transmission and reflection at weld interface 14 and the back side of lower sheet 18, system 10 uses two adjustable electronic gates to filter out all unwanted reflected signals. The two signals that pass through the gates are either the reflected signal from the back side of the second sheet of metal or the reflected signal from the interface of the two sheet metals. The first gate is called the “surface gate” and the second gate is called the “interface gate”. This approach differs from the current commercially available systems that utilize an attenuation coefficient compensation method. In such systems, multiple reflections from all of surfaces and the interface are taken into account to determine attenuation coefficients and make a correction for acoustic energy loss caused by the spot weld fusion, assuming that the microstructure of fused section of the spot weld has a higher attenuation coefficient compared to a stuck weld condition. As disclosed and claimed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/186,047, which is incorporated by reference herein, each ultrasonic element in array 106 generates a primary ultrasonic beam and a secondary ultrasonic beam wherein the primary ultrasonic beam is high gain and wherein the secondary ultrasonic beam is low gain; and wherein the primary and secondary ultrasonic beams are fired in within very close proximity to one another (i.e., milliseconds). As shown in
a-c provide illustrations of test results derived from analyzing a poor spot weld using system 10. In
a-b provide illustrations of test results derived from analyzing a stuck weld using system 10. Because an incomplete or poorly formed weld exists, ultrasonic beams travel only partially through interface 14, while intermediate echoes appear between the echoes of interface 14 and full back wall reflection.
a-b illustrate the geometry of the curved three-dimensional probe element (
The design of the three-dimensional probe permits inspection of a larger physical area with a smaller probe, thereby allowing for improved probe access as well as a wider coverage area compared to two-dimensional designs. The three-dimensional geometrical arrangement provides optimized accuracy and sensitivity in particular regions of the weld joint. As illustrated by
In various embodiments of this invention, a computerized controller is coupled to acoustic probe 100 and transducer elements 106 for directing transmission of the ultrasonic signals and for summing and receiving responses therefrom. With general reference to
In summary, some of the distinct advantages of this invention include: (i) a three-dimensional matrix probe element; (ii) a phase delay with sub-element group to form a beam focusing and steering capability; (iii) conformable membrane (no need for an attenuation correction); and (iv) an image process utilizing electronic gates to filter out unwanted reflections. While the present invention has been illustrated by the description of exemplary embodiments thereof, and while the embodiments have been described in certain detail, it is not the intention of the Applicant to restrict or in any way limit the scope of the appended claims to such detail. Additional advantages and modifications will readily appear to those skilled in the art. Therefore, the invention in its broader aspects is not limited to any of the specific details, representative devices and methods, and/or illustrative examples shown and described. Accordingly, departures may be made from such details without departing from the spirit or scope of the applicant's general inventive concept.
This patent application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/484,312 filed on May 10, 2011 and entitled “Three-Dimensional Matrix Phased Array Spot Weld Inspection System”, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety and made part of the present U.S. utility patent application for all purposes.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3895685 | Gillette et al. | Jul 1975 | A |
3978714 | Shraiber et al. | Sep 1976 | A |
4274289 | Weiss et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
4327738 | Green et al. | May 1982 | A |
4344159 | Ballinger | Aug 1982 | A |
4442715 | Brisken et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
4534221 | Fife et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
4631710 | Yamaguchi et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4642215 | Klinvex et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4744250 | Ganglbauer et al. | May 1988 | A |
4770699 | Mountford | Sep 1988 | A |
4836026 | P'An et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4865040 | Ogasawara | Sep 1989 | A |
4886069 | O'Donnell | Dec 1989 | A |
5030911 | Lam | Jul 1991 | A |
5063780 | Landry et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5121364 | O'Donnell | Jun 1992 | A |
5142649 | O'Donnell | Aug 1992 | A |
5278757 | Hoctor et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5282471 | Sato | Feb 1994 | A |
5299577 | Brown et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5331964 | Trahey et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5351543 | Migliori et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5473943 | Schoenen et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5487306 | Fortes | Jan 1996 | A |
5513532 | Beffy et al. | May 1996 | A |
5531117 | Fortes | Jul 1996 | A |
5549111 | Wright et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5677490 | Gunther et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5750895 | Chern et al. | May 1998 | A |
5777891 | Pagano et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5797844 | Yoshioka et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5797847 | Miller et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
6055862 | Martens | May 2000 | A |
6072144 | Perryman et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6250163 | MacLauchlan et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6254542 | Hamilton et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6279397 | Dwyer | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6332011 | Johnson | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6344739 | Hardy et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6484584 | Johnson et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6532820 | Fleming et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6640632 | Hatanaka et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6676603 | Aichhorn et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6725721 | Venczel | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6732587 | Lorraine et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6813950 | Glascock et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6857553 | Hartman et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6865243 | Paillaman et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6911008 | Pelissier et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6920791 | Wagner et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6925882 | Fleming et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6931931 | Graff et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6945937 | Culp et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6948369 | Fleming et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6957583 | Tooma et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
7021143 | Dasch | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7132617 | Lee et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7210329 | Buschke et | May 2007 | B2 |
7234355 | Dewangan et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7240556 | Georgeson et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7389693 | Reed et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7428842 | Fair et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7516022 | Lee et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7650790 | Wright | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7694566 | Kleinert | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7698944 | Takada | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7735369 | Young et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7757557 | Thomas et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7779693 | Orth et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7779694 | Iizuka | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7784347 | Messer et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7784348 | Dubois et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7789286 | Maev et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7926349 | Sargent | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7984651 | Randall et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8076824 | Sawada et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8079263 | Randall et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8164982 | Okuda et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8166822 | Urbano et al. | May 2012 | B1 |
8220334 | Klessel et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8365584 | Quinones et al. | Feb 2013 | B1 |
8485036 | Crumpton et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8499634 | Urbano et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8499635 | Klessel et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8521446 | Zhang et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8544714 | Obaditch et al. | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8554328 | Faraji et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8600299 | Randall et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8616062 | Kono et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8649185 | Wodnicki et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8656783 | Randall et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8689850 | Hull | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8695429 | Urbano et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8746070 | Tippit, Jr. et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
20040020298 | Siverling et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20050132809 | Fleming et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20080114253 | Randall et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080196504 | Johnson et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20090007678 | Fukutomi et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090133501 | Georgeson | May 2009 | A1 |
20090255341 | Zimmerman et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090320598 | Puchner et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100224000 | Komatsu et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100286527 | Cannon et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110120223 | MacLauchlan et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20120034044 | Sloan | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120065937 | de Graff et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120091185 | Ume et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120167690 | Yamano | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120243771 | Matsumoto et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120272739 | Both et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130167646 | Frederick et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130181574 | Chaggares et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130194891 | Kristoffersen et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130228560 | Ume et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130255384 | Putsherry et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130308419 | Singh et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130312528 | Feydo | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130315035 | Tai | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130319120 | Fetzer et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130338941 | Lin et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140107534 | Du et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2006071656 | Jul 2006 | WO |
2007068979 | Jun 2007 | WO |
2010097269 | Sep 2010 | WO |
2012058473 | May 2012 | WO |
2012103628 | Aug 2012 | WO |
2012167380 | Dec 2012 | WO |
2013044350 | Apr 2013 | WO |
2014062467 | Apr 2014 | WO |
2014081721 | May 2014 | WO |
2014100217 | Jun 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Dr. Michael D. C. Moles et al., Introduction to Phased Array Ultrasonic Technology Applications, 2004, pp. 6-18, R/D Tech, Inc., Canada. |
Moles et al., “Pipeline Girth Weld Inspections using Ultrasonic Phased Arrays,” Pan-American Conference for Nondestructive Testing, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil, Jun. 6, 2003, entire document. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion received in PCT/US2009/049428, mailed Aug. 31, 2009. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion received in PCT/US2012/037322, mailed Aug. 27, 2012. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120310551 A1 | Dec 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61484312 | May 2011 | US |