The invention pertains to methods and mechanisms to achieve three dimensional (3D) motion and fixation using pathway-based actuators. The invention has application in transportation, shipping, manufacturing, and other pursuits where it is desirable to move objects along, about and/or transverse to a pathway. By way of non-limiting example, the invention has application to achieving rotation and translation in three dimensions of objects carried by linear machines, including linear motors.
The design and manufacture of linear machines has been carried on for many years, but the applications have been primarily for motion along a single pathway or the use of two linear machines to create motion along more than one pathway. The increased use of synchronous motors is due to the evolution of microprocessors designed specifically for motor control, the availability of more cost effective power electronics, and better permanent magnets. The Linear Synchronous Motor (LSM) has benefited from advances in rotary synchronous motor technology and for many applications allows performance and cost advantages as compared with alternatives such as conveyor belts and rotary motors. There are also advantages when compared with other types of linear motors, such as the Linear Induction Motor (LIM) and the Linear Reluctance Motor (LRM).
There are several problems that linear machine designers must address: decreasing cost, reducing size and weight, increasing efficiency, eliminating cogging or ripple force, simplifying manufacturing, providing precise stopping and providing movement along more than one pathway. This patent addresses the issues of multi-pathway movement and precise stopping while retaining reduced cost, good efficiency, reduced ripple force and simplified manufacture.
Linear motors have been constructed in a manner to allow multidimensional control, but they all use two or more motor pathways to achieve multidimensional motion. Examples include: U.S. Pat. No. 3,376,578, Magnetic positioning device; U.S. Pat. No. 5,368,425, Multi-axis linear motor positioner with y-axis supported at single end; U.S. Pat. No. 5,763,966, Single plane motor system generating orthogonal movement; U.S. Pat. No. 5,938,577, Symmetrical, multi-axis linear motor machine tool; U.S. Pat. No. 6,175,169, Closed-loop planar linear motor with integral, monolithic three-degree-of-freedom ac-magnetic position/orientation sensor; U.S. Pat. No. 6,445,093, Planar motor with linear coils arrays; and U.S. Pat. No. 6,703,806, XYZ-Axes Table.
In view of the foregoing, an object of the invention is to provide improved methods and apparatus for moving people, packages, materials and other things.
A related object is to provide such methods and apparatus as are adapted for achieving rotational and translational motion of objects relative to a pathway.
A further related object is to provide such methods and apparatus as are adapted for achieving such motion using actuators that move along and/or define such a pathway.
Yet a still further related object is to provide such methods and apparatus as are adapted for use with linear motors.
The foregoing are among the objects attained by the invention which provides, inter alia, novel mechanisms and methods for effecting rotational and translational motion in three dimensions of objects carried by, or coupled to, actuators that move along a pathway. Vehicles or other conveyances (collectively, “vehicles”) that utilize mechanisms and methods can increase the performance of and decrease the cost of transportation, shipping, manufacturing, materials handling and other systems.
In one aspect, the invention provides such a vehicle or other conveyance having two (or more) actuators adapted for movement along a pathway. The actuators are propelled or otherwise capable of motion, relative to each other so that the distance between them can be increased or decreased. When desired, that distance can also be maintained the same, e.g., regardless of whether the actuators are moving along a pathway. A pallet, carriage or other moveable part (collectively, pallet) is moveably coupled to the actuators so that at least selected motions by the actuators relative to one another on the pathway effect rotational and/or translational motion of the pallet in three dimensions relative to the pathway, including, for example, movement transverse to the pathway and out of a plane of the pathway.
Further aspects of the invention provide a conveyance as described above in which the actuators move along a pathway defined by primaries (or secondaries) of one or more linear synchronous motors (LSMs). Those primaries (or secondaries) may comprise, for example, sections or “blocks” of an LSM track or guideway. The actuators, conversely, may comprise secondaries (or primaries) of the LSMs, so that as the blocks' primaries (secondaries) are energized the actuator's secondaries (primaries) are subjected to a translational force—thereby causing the actuators, themselves, to move.
Related aspects of the invention provide a conveyance as described above in which the actuators are disposed for relative motion with respect to one another when at least the secondary (primary) associated each actuator is disposed over the primary (secondary) associated with different respective blocks.
Further related aspects of the invention comprise a controller for selectively actuating the primary of the linear synchronous motor associated with said blocks so as to effect motion of the actuators relative to one another.
In other aspects, the invention provides conveyances as described above in which the pallet comprises first and second coupling members, each of which couples with a corresponding member on a respective one of the actuators. Movement of the actuators relative to one another—and, thereby, movement of the coupling member on each actuator relative to the respective one of the first and second coupling members on the pallet—causes rotational and/or translational motion of the pallet in three dimensions relative to the pathway, including, for example, movement transverse to the pathway and out of a plane of the pathway.
Related aspects of the invention provide conveyances as described above in which (i) the first and second coupling members comprise slots (or other indented members) and (ii) the corresponding coupling members on the actuators comprise pins (or other protruding members) that mate with those slots. Contrariwise, the first and second coupling members can comprise pins (or other protruding members) and the corresponding coupling members on the actuators can comprise slots (or other indented members).
In still further related aspects of the invention, the slots (or other indented members) are angled relative to the pathway so that sliding movement of the corresponding pins (or other protruding members) relative thereto causes rotational and/or translational motion of the pallet in three dimensions relative to the pathway.
Still further aspects of the invention provide stop members that couple with or otherwise engage the pallet and, thereby, (i) inhibit rotational and/or translational motion caused by the actuators, e.g., at a precise repeatable position, thereby eliminating the need for externally actuated hard stops, and/or (ii) further enhance such rotation and/or translations (e.g., by causing pivoting).
Yet still other aspects of the invention provide methods of inter-operating actuators and pallets in accord with the above in order to affect rotational and/or translational motion in three dimensions of objects in relative to a pathway.
LSM-based methods and apparatus according to the invention provides increased performance at decreased manufacturing cost in comparison with those produced according to presently accepted methodologies by:
The invention provides, inter alia, for use of these methodologies in a variety of combinations to achieve a wide range of motions and superior ratio of performance to cost. Thus, according to one aspect of the invention, there are provided vehicles and control logic that provide motion in a direction other than the motor axis, thereby eliminating the need for a second motor and control.
Still other aspects of the invention provided fixtures and control logic to provide motion around corners, thereby eliminating the need for special motor elements for curves and corners. These and still other aspects of the invention are evident in the drawings and in the description that follows.
A more complete understanding of the invention may be attained by reference to the description below, taken together with drawings, in which:
Theory of Operation
The illustrated embodiment employs combinations of design techniques to achieve multidimensional motion for a variety of types of applications including material handling, transportation, assembly automation, and packaging. The discussion and figures refer to a linear synchronous machine with permanent magnet field, but the teachings are applicable to a wide class of linear machines (that is, of machines with actuators that move along a linear (or non-linear) pathway. The illustrated embodiment provides a means for a multiplicity of multi-pathway motions via the independent movement of two or more linear propulsion mechanisms acting along a single motor pathway.
A building block for the illustrated embodiment, shown in
A vehicle is constructed by mounting a platform 20 on top of a multiplicity of pallets. The platform, shown in
Examples of Off-Axis Motion
Fixation
Some applications require the platform to be moved to a precisely located position and to stay there while some operation takes place. For example, in assembly automation a platform is moved to a precise position under a robot which then performs an operation on a part mounted on the pallet. The position must be very accurately controlled, often to a tolerance on the order of 10 micrometers, and this position must be maintained while considerable force is applied to the part. With conventional conveyor belt technology a “hard stop” is moved into the path of the vehicle by an external actuator and the conveyor belt pushes the platform into the stopping mechanism. The stopping mechanism and its actuator are expensive and create a limit to the speed of the conveyor. With conventional linear motor technology a very precise position sensing system must be used and the motor controller must create a very rigid stop; both of these features add considerable cost. With the technology disclosed herein the vehicle can be pushed in an off-axis direction into a fixed stopping mechanism with substantial saving in cost and reduction in the number of moving parts.
Rotation
Cornering
Cornering poses two problems for vehicle propulsion using linear machines: it is expensive to make a curved linear motor primary, and a linear motor secondary can not maintain alignment with a curved primary unless it articulated. If the curve radius is large these problems are minimal but it is virtually impossible to negotiate very sharp curves. Some applications, such as assembly automation, demand the use of sharp turns because of space limitations.
Ejection
In some cases it is desirable to be able to move an object mounted on the platform, e.g. to eject an object from the platform. This can be accomplished by the means shown in
Switching
A common problem is to switch a vehicle to either of two guideways according to a control signal. There are many ways to accomplish this but most of them depend on a movable mechanism on the guideway. It is desirable to be able to switch the vehicle via mechanisms located on the vehicle so that a following vehicle does not have to depend on the mechanism working correctly.
In
Controller
A controller (not shown) energizes linear motor primary “blocks” that make up the guideway. In the illustrate embodiments those blocks are sized between one and five times the length of the individual pallets, though other block sizes can be used. In order to effect the motions shown in
The controller effects movement of each two-pallet “vehicle” by using a command that consists of two subcommands—the movement subcommand for the lead pallet and a movement subcommand for the trailing pallet. In this scenario, the longitudinal movement of the platform that is coupled to the pallets will follow the average of the two subcommands, and the off-axis movement will follow a transform of the two commands. (Note that the longitudinal movement need not be the average; the average is just a simple case). If the two commands are the same, only on-axis movement is performed.
An equivalent movement command could also be comprised of an on-axis subcommand and an off axis subcommand. In this scenario, the lead vehicle would follow the on-axis command minus half of the off-axis command and the trailing vehicle would follow the on-axis command plus half of the off-axis command. The longitudinal movement of the platform itself will follow the on-axis command and the off-axis movement of the platform will follow the transformed off axis command (the transformation depends upon the coupling method between the pallets and the platform). (Note that depending on the design of the coupling method, the longitudinal movement of the platform could also follow a different transform of the two movement commands.)
The movement commands can vary in complexity depending on the required movement complexity. The commands may be as simple as move a certain distance in a certain direction when simple off-axis movements are required. The commands may be more complex in nature, such as the specification of movement profiles (cubic functions indicating position, for instance) when more complex movement is required with coordination of off-and on-axis movement. One such application for the more complex case may be laying down a line, circle, or other pattern of glue. Other applications may utilize commands at a high update rate to implement a servo-type system.
One implementation of this type of system would make one pallet the ‘slave’ to the other ‘master’ pallet. The controller in charge of the ‘master’ pallet would send movement commands to the controller in charge of the ‘slave’ pallet so that the two pallets can move in a coordinated fashion. The controller in charge of the ‘master’ pallet is also in charge of the whole vehicle, and handles all commands from external systems. This controller is in charge of responding to its own errors, those of the controller of the ‘slave’ pallet, and those of any controllers in between.
Alternative Switching Embodiment
An alternative to vehicle based switching is shown in
The use of two or more linear motor secondaries to propel two or more pallets allows a platform on the vehicle to move in directions not aligned with the linear motor axis. The prior discussion explains examples of how this concept can lead to off-axis motion in any direction, fixation, switching, and motion through a sharp curve. An advantage of all of the illustrated embodiments is that there are fewer moving parts and a single control system is required. When compared with conventional technology this can be a significant advantage and leads to lower system cost.
Those skilled in the art can create similar designs based on the teachings hereof. For example, there can be other coupling mechanisms that will create other types of off-axis motion. The use of more than three or more motor secondaries can be used to create even more complex off-axis motion. In addition, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the teachings herein can be applied to conveyance systems including guideways (e.g., as described above) oriented in any direction, including, for example, horizontal and vertical.
This Application is a continuation of, and claims the benefit of priority of, copending, commonly assigned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/123,385, filed May 6, 2005, entitled “Three-Dimensional Motion Using Single-Pathway Based Actuators,” which itself claims the benefit of priority to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. Nos. 60/569,168, filed May 7, 2004, entitled “Three-Dimensional Motion Using Single-Pathway Based Actuators” and 60/669,057, filed Apr. 6, 2005, entitled “Three-Dimensional Motion Using Single-Pathway Based Actuators.” The teachings of the foregoing applications are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3029893 | Mountjoy | Apr 1962 | A |
3376578 | Sawyer | Apr 1968 | A |
3440600 | Frech et al. | Apr 1969 | A |
3532934 | Ballman | Oct 1970 | A |
3609676 | Jauquet et al. | Sep 1971 | A |
3617890 | Kurauchi et al. | Nov 1971 | A |
3628462 | Holt | Dec 1971 | A |
3636508 | Ogilvy et al. | Jan 1972 | A |
3638093 | Ross | Jan 1972 | A |
3679874 | Fickenscher | Jul 1972 | A |
3706922 | Inagaki | Dec 1972 | A |
3768417 | Thornton et al. | Oct 1973 | A |
3772640 | Auer, Jr. et al. | Nov 1973 | A |
3786411 | Kurauchi et al. | Jan 1974 | A |
3834318 | Fellows et al. | Sep 1974 | A |
3842751 | Thornton et al. | Oct 1974 | A |
3845720 | Bohn et al. | Nov 1974 | A |
3847088 | Karch et al. | Nov 1974 | A |
3850108 | Winkle et al. | Nov 1974 | A |
3858521 | Atherton et al. | Jan 1975 | A |
3860300 | Lyman | Jan 1975 | A |
3860843 | Kawasaki et al. | Jan 1975 | A |
3871301 | Kolm et al. | Mar 1975 | A |
3874299 | Silva et al. | Apr 1975 | A |
3882789 | Simon et al. | May 1975 | A |
3899979 | Godsey, Jr. | Aug 1975 | A |
3906436 | Kurauchi et al. | Sep 1975 | A |
3912992 | Lamb et al. | Oct 1975 | A |
3927735 | Miericke et al. | Dec 1975 | A |
3937148 | Simpson | Feb 1976 | A |
3979091 | Gagnon et al. | Sep 1976 | A |
4023753 | Dobler et al. | May 1977 | A |
4061089 | Sawyer | Dec 1977 | A |
4065706 | Gosling et al. | Dec 1977 | A |
4088379 | Perper | May 1978 | A |
4132175 | Miller et al. | Jan 1979 | A |
4140063 | Nakamura et al. | Feb 1979 | A |
4292465 | Wilson et al. | Sep 1981 | A |
4361202 | Minovitch | Nov 1982 | A |
4424463 | Musil | Jan 1984 | A |
4441604 | Schlig et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
4522128 | Anderson | Jun 1985 | A |
4646651 | Yamamura et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4665829 | Anderson | May 1987 | A |
4665830 | Anderson et al. | May 1987 | A |
4671185 | Anderson et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4698895 | Miller et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4711182 | Alexandrov et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4714400 | Barnett et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4726299 | Anderson | Feb 1988 | A |
4776464 | Miller et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4794865 | Lindberg | Jan 1989 | A |
4800328 | Bolger et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4811667 | Morishita et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4829445 | Burney | May 1989 | A |
4836344 | Bolger | Jun 1989 | A |
4847526 | Takehara et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4893071 | Miller | Jan 1990 | A |
4914539 | Turner et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4953470 | Yamaguchi et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4972779 | Morishita et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
5032746 | Ueda et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5032747 | Sakamoto et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5108052 | Malewicki et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5126606 | Hofmann et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5152227 | Kato et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5161758 | Shuto et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5178037 | Mihirogi et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5180041 | Shuto et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5193767 | Mihirogi et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5199674 | Mihirogi et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5214323 | Ueda et al. | May 1993 | A |
5214981 | Weinberger et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5225726 | Tozoni | Jul 1993 | A |
5242136 | Cribbens et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5247890 | Mihirogi et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5251563 | Staehs et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5263670 | Colbaugh et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5267514 | Staehs et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5277124 | DiFonso et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5277125 | DiFonso et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5293308 | Boys et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5325974 | Staehs | Jul 1994 | A |
5368425 | Mills et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5370059 | Raschbichler et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5409095 | Hoshi et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5435429 | Van Den Goor et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5444341 | Kneifel, II et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5450305 | Boys et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5452663 | Berdut | Sep 1995 | A |
5467718 | Shibata et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5517924 | He et al. | May 1996 | A |
5519266 | Chitayat | May 1996 | A |
5521451 | Oudet et al. | May 1996 | A |
5523637 | Miller | Jun 1996 | A |
5528113 | Boys et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5551350 | Yamada et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5573090 | Ross | Nov 1996 | A |
5590604 | Lund | Jan 1997 | A |
5590995 | Berkers et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5592158 | Riffaud et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5595121 | Elliott et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5619078 | Boys et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5642013 | Wavre | Jun 1997 | A |
5708427 | Bush | Jan 1998 | A |
5709291 | Nishino et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5720454 | Bachetti et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5722326 | Post | Mar 1998 | A |
5723917 | Chitayat | Mar 1998 | A |
5757100 | Burgbacher et al. | May 1998 | A |
5757288 | Dixon et al. | May 1998 | A |
5763966 | Hinds | Jun 1998 | A |
5821638 | Boys et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5839554 | Clark et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5839567 | Kyotani et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5898579 | Boys et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5900728 | Moser et al. | May 1999 | A |
5906647 | Zyburt et al. | May 1999 | A |
5910691 | Wavre et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5927657 | Takasan et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5938577 | Lindem | Aug 1999 | A |
5952743 | Sidey et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5962937 | Wavre | Oct 1999 | A |
5990592 | Miura et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6005511 | Young et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6008552 | Yagoto et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6011508 | Perreault et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6025659 | Nashiki | Feb 2000 | A |
6032110 | Ishihara et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6034499 | Tranovich | Mar 2000 | A |
6044770 | Davey et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6064301 | Takahashi et al. | May 2000 | A |
6081058 | Suzuki et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6087742 | Maestre | Jul 2000 | A |
6089512 | Ansorge et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6100821 | Tanji et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6101952 | Thornton et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6104117 | Nakamura et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6137424 | Cohen et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6147421 | Takita et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6175169 | Hollis, Jr. et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6225919 | Lumbis et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6242822 | Strothmann et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6286434 | Fischperer et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6326708 | Tsuboi et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6376957 | Haydock et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6414742 | Korenaga et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6417584 | Chitayat | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6417914 | Li | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6418857 | Okano et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6445093 | Binnard | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6499701 | Thornton et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6534894 | Flowerday et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6646721 | Compter et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6684794 | Fiske et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6703806 | Joong et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6781524 | Clark et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6788385 | Tanaka et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6911747 | Tsuboi et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6917136 | Thornton et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6930413 | Marzano | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6983701 | Thornton et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7009683 | Sato et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7019818 | Opower et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7458454 | Mendenhall | Dec 2008 | B2 |
20050242675 | Thornton et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050263369 | Mendenhall | Dec 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2532269 | Feb 1977 | DE |
235786 | May 1986 | DE |
4114706 | Oct 1992 | DE |
19535856 | Mar 1997 | DE |
10000513 | Sep 2001 | DE |
0179188 | Apr 1986 | EP |
0229669 | Jul 1987 | EP |
0482424 | Apr 1992 | EP |
1283586 | Feb 2003 | EP |
44015850 | Jul 1969 | JP |
63310357 | Dec 1988 | JP |
1136504 | May 1989 | JP |
01136504 | May 1989 | JP |
3029747 | Feb 1991 | JP |
8129336 | May 1996 | JP |
08205514 | Aug 1996 | JP |
8205514 | Aug 1996 | JP |
2004112864 | Apr 2004 | JP |
914927 | Mar 1991 | KR |
20030006756 | Jan 2003 | KR |
20030013868 | Feb 2003 | KR |
20030057995 | Jul 2003 | KR |
1140212 | Feb 1985 | SU |
WO-9521405 | Aug 1995 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090107806 A1 | Apr 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60569168 | May 2004 | US | |
60669057 | Apr 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11123385 | May 2005 | US |
Child | 12259928 | US |