The present invention relates to the field of three-dimensional (3D) radar. More specifically, the present invention relates to the field of 3D avian radar for detecting, determining height, and tracking birds.
Aviation experts say bird-plane collisions happen daily. Nearly 200 people have been killed or injured since 1990 in accidents involving aircraft and wildlife. It is estimated that bird strikes cost military and commercial aviation over $2 billion each year due to damage and other costs.
Airports take a variety of measures to reduce bird populations near major airports. In a few cases, ground based avian radars are used to detect flying birds near aircraft approach and departure paths. Currently, most ground based avian radars consist of modified marine radars using a long narrow horizontal antenna that is rotated in the horizontal plane to provide 360 degree azimuth coverage. These antennas provide narrow azimuth beamwidths and wide elevation beamwidths. Almost no target height information is provided due to the wide elevation beamwidths.
Accordingly, it is the object of the present invention to disclose methods and apparatus which provide a new and improved low cost 3D avian radar with target altitude determination capability.
Previously, an avian radar was described in patent application Ser. No. 12/661,595 “Three Dimensional Radar Method and Apparatus”, filed 18 Mar. 2010 which is incorporated herein by reference. application Ser. No. 12/661/595 describes a 3D ground based radar whose receiving antenna consists of a vertical array of horizontal fixed scan narrow azimuth beamwidth slotted waveguide antenna elements. These horizontal elements are electronically combined to provide a narrow azimuth and elevation beamwidth antenna that can be mechanically scanned in azimuth and electronically scanned in elevation. The present invention describes an improved receiving antenna method and apparatus.
Briefly, to achieve the desired object of the present invention, a vertically oriented offset parabolic cylindrical receiving antenna is implemented. Using an array of antenna elements along its vertical offset continuous focal line allows a modular high performance electronically elevation scanned antenna to be built at low cost.
The desired azimuth beamwidth is controlled by the width of the parabolic cylinder and the desired elevation beamwidth by the height of the parabolic cylinder. A ribbed structure covered with a thin metal reflector is used to achieve the reflector surface accuracy required to obtain very low sidelobe performance. The antenna can be built in short modular vertical segments and stacked vertically to provide different elevation beamwidths.
Other objects and advantages of the present invention will become obvious as the preferred embodiments are described and discussed below.
The goal of the present invention is to provide a low cost high gain receiving antenna with very low sidelobes that can be scanned mechanically in azimuth and scanned electronically in elevation.
A horizontal cross section of a vertically oriented offset parabolic cylinder antenna with vertical focal line 15 is illustrated in
As is well known by those skilled in the art, the gain of an offset parabolic cylinder antenna is governed by its aperture area. Its efficiency and sidelobe performance are governed by antenna element illumination pattern 25 and by the accuracy of parabolic cylinder reflector surface 5. To obtain maximum efficiency, parabolic cylinder reflector surface 5 must be uniformly illuminated over its surface with no spillover energy beyond its edge. However, such uniform illumination produces only −13 dB sidelobes. To produce low antenna azimuth sidelobe levels, antenna element illumination pattern 25 must be tapered as illustrated in
Parabolic cylinder antenna sidelobe levels below −50 dB, as illustrated in
Very high parabolic cylinder reflector surface 5 and focal line 15 accuracy of offset parabolic cylinder antenna 60 can be provided at low cost using the structure illustrated in
For the relatively narrowband radar signals contemplated for this avian radar, antenna elements 45 can be implemented at low cost using narrowband microwave patch antennas printed directly on PCB 50. Antennas with horizontal, vertical, or circular polarization can be implemented. However, horizontal polarization is most appropriate for avian targets because birds are wider in their horizontal dimension than in their vertical dimension thus maximizing their radar reflectivity using horizontal polarization. However, any appropriate antenna elements 45 can be implemented that meets the required sidelobe level and cost goals.
A frontal view of offset parabolic cylinder antenna 60 is illustrated in
The signal produced by each antenna element 45 will be received using an identical antenna element 45 receiver 130 illustrated in
Antenna element 45 and LNA 131 can be designed as an active antenna to eliminate antenna to LNA connection loss. Doing so optimizes receiver noise figure and doesn't require a 50 ohm impedance match between the antenna and LNA. Data Multiplexer 138 places the data from all PCB 50 receivers 130 onto a single digital output 115. Coax or fiberoptic cable will be used to route digital output 115 to further circuitry in the 3D radar where the data from each receiver 130 will be demultiplexed, digitally beam formed, and processed as explained in patent application Ser. No. 12/661,595. Multiplexing the data from multiple antenna elements 45 eliminates the need for multiple cables and connectors, thus lowering implementation cost.
Offset parabolic cylinder antenna 60 will be tilted up 15 degrees, mounted on a rotating pedestal, mechanically rotated 360 degrees in azimuth about rotation axis 315, and enclosed in radome enclosure 305 as illustrated in
Although the preferred embodiments of the invention have been illustrated and described in detail, it will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications may be made therein without departing from the spirit of the invention.
For example, each PCB 50 could include all receiver, scaler, quadrature downconverter, and beamformers described in patent application Ser. No. 12/661,595. The beamformer outputs from each PCB 50 could then be combined in the signal detection processor, also described in patent application Ser. No. 12/661,595. Doing so would greatly reduce the data transfer requirements between the circuitry on PCBs 50 and the signal processor circuitry on another PCB.
As another example, modular vertical sections could be made short enough to contain a single antenna element and receiver. The number of modules stacked would determine the elevation beamwidth. Any convenient means such as coax, fiber optic, or wireless communications could be used to collect the data from all modules and transfer the digital data to the 3D radar for beamforming and further processing.
Also, this antenna could be used for many applications other than avian radar simply by changing the illumination pattern 25 of antenna element 45 and the aperture size of offset parabolic cylinder antenna 60.
Many other simple modifications are also possible without departing from the spirit of the invention.
The present invention claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) to: “3D Radar Antenna Method and Apparatus” Provisional U.S. Patent Application Ser. No. 61/271,546, filed 22 Jul. 2009 which is incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3016531 | Tomiyasu et al. | Jan 1962 | A |
3070795 | Chambers | Dec 1962 | A |
3080523 | Miller | Mar 1963 | A |
3170158 | Rotman | Feb 1965 | A |
3182318 | Brown | May 1965 | A |
3214755 | Blass et al. | Oct 1965 | A |
3267472 | Fink | Aug 1966 | A |
3274593 | Varela et al. | Sep 1966 | A |
3295128 | Canaday et al. | Dec 1966 | A |
3438035 | Fling et al. | Apr 1969 | A |
3448450 | Alfandariet al. | Jun 1969 | A |
3775769 | Heeren et al. | Nov 1973 | A |
3790938 | Anderson et al. | Feb 1974 | A |
3815134 | Jones | Jun 1974 | A |
3864679 | Hannan et al. | Feb 1975 | A |
3881178 | Hannan | Apr 1975 | A |
3916415 | Howrey | Oct 1975 | A |
3938149 | Grantham | Feb 1976 | A |
3971020 | Howard | Jul 1976 | A |
4101902 | Trigon | Jul 1978 | A |
4129872 | Toman | Dec 1978 | A |
4156243 | Yorinks et al. | May 1979 | A |
4158840 | Schwab | Jun 1979 | A |
4342997 | Evans | Aug 1982 | A |
4353073 | Brunner et al. | Oct 1982 | A |
4408205 | Hockham | Oct 1983 | A |
4544925 | Drabowitch et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4631545 | Dragone | Dec 1986 | A |
4649389 | Taylor et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4675681 | Kinsey | Jun 1987 | A |
4689632 | Graham | Aug 1987 | A |
4724439 | Wiley et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4996532 | Kirimoto et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5008678 | Herman | Apr 1991 | A |
5016018 | Chang et al. | May 1991 | A |
5059966 | Fujisaka et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5072226 | Chang et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5202700 | Miller | Apr 1993 | A |
5389941 | Yu | Feb 1995 | A |
5448243 | Bethke et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5546096 | Wada | Aug 1996 | A |
5557282 | Mertens | Sep 1996 | A |
5579010 | Iihoshi et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5598173 | Lo Forti et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5686923 | Schaller | Nov 1997 | A |
5754139 | Turcotte et al. | May 1998 | A |
5812096 | Tilford | Sep 1998 | A |
5815113 | Lo et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5856804 | Turcotte et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5859609 | Sheen et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
6052024 | Lo et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6078298 | Planning et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6087999 | Muhlhauser et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6091363 | Komatsu et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6107897 | Muhlhauser et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6160520 | Muhlhauser et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6172650 | Ogawa et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6181293 | Muhlhauser et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6353421 | Lalezari et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6411255 | Roederer | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6507313 | Rougas | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6819285 | Stockman et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6888515 | Bekey | May 2005 | B2 |
7006053 | Zigler et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7019703 | Webb et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7194236 | Lovberg et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7315279 | Milbourne | Jan 2008 | B1 |
7378629 | Goutoule et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7385549 | Lovberg et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7415244 | Kolinko et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7570221 | May et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7834807 | Chang | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7864103 | Weber et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
8098612 | Chang | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8395546 | Chang | Mar 2013 | B2 |
20030038745 | Lalezari et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20040189545 | Bekey | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040217908 | Zigler et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050057428 | Fujita | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050140563 | Eom et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050237265 | Durham et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050248495 | Webb et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050259006 | Kim et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060017605 | Lovberg et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060148525 | Moon et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20070194977 | Goutoule et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080266171 | Weber et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080291083 | Chang | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20110032143 | Sun et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61271546 | Jul 2009 | US |