This invention relates generally to user interfaces for computerized systems, and specifically to user interfaces that are based on three-dimensional sensing.
Many different types of user interface devices and methods are currently available. Common tactile interface devices include a computer keyboard, a mouse and a joystick. Touch screens detect the presence and location of a touch by a finger or other object within the display area. Infrared remote controls are widely used, and “wearable” hardware devices have been developed, as well, for purposes of remote control.
Computer interfaces based on three-dimensional (3D) sensing of parts of a user's body have also been proposed. For example, PCT International Publication WO 03/071410, whose disclosure is incorporated herein by reference, describes a gesture recognition system using depth-perceptive sensors. A 3D sensor, typically positioned in a room in proximity to the user, provides position information, which is used to identify gestures created by a body part of interest. The gestures are recognized based on the shape of the body part and its position and orientation over an interval. The gesture is classified for determining an input into a related electronic device.
As another example, U.S. Pat. No. 7,348,963, whose disclosure is incorporated herein by reference, describes an interactive video display system, in which a display screen displays a visual image, and a camera captures 3D information regarding an object in an interactive area located in front of the display screen. A computer system directs the display screen to change the visual image in response to changes in the object.
Documents incorporated by reference in the present patent application are to be considered an integral part of the application except that to the extent any terms are defined in these incorporated documents in a manner that conflicts with the definitions made explicitly or implicitly in the present specification, only the definitions in the present specification should be considered.
The description above is presented as a general overview of related art in this field and should not be construed as an admission that any of the information it contains constitutes prior art against the present patent application.
There is provided, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention a method, including receiving, by a computer executing a non-tactile three dimensional (3D) user interface, a first set of multiple 3D coordinates representing a gesture performed by a user positioned within a field of view of a sensing device coupled to the computer, the first set of 3D coordinates including multiple points in a fixed 3D coordinate system local to the sensing device, and transforming the first set of multiple 3D coordinates to a second set of corresponding multiple 3D coordinates in a subjective 3D coordinate system local to the user.
There is also provided, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention a method, including receiving, by a computer executing a non-tactile three dimensional (3D) user interface, a set of multiple 3D coordinates representing a gesture performed by a limb of a user positioned within a field of view of a sensing device coupled to the computer, the set of 3D coordinates including first multiple points measured in a fixed 3D coordinate system local to the sensing device, and transforming any of the first multiple points that indicate the limb moving along a depth axis local to the sensing device to corresponding second multiple points along a depth axis local to the user, upon the set of multiple 3D coordinates indicating that a motion of a joint associated with the limb exceeds a specified threshold.
There is alternatively provided, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention a method, including presenting, by a computer executing a non-tactile three dimensional (3D) user interface, a cursor in proximity to one or more items on a display, receiving a set of multiple 3D coordinates representing a gesture performed by a body part of a user being positioned within a field of view of a sensing device coupled to the computer, calculating a ratio between a first size of the cursor and a second size of the body part, and positioning the cursor responsively to the received set of multiple coordinates in proportion to the calculated ratio.
There is additionally provided, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention a method, including presenting, by a computer executing a non-tactile three dimensional (3D) user interface, an interactive cursor in proximity to one or more items on a display, receiving a set of multiple 3D coordinates representing a gesture performed by a user positioned within a field of view of a sensing device coupled to the computer, positioning the interactive cursor responsively to the received set of multiple coordinates, and conveying feedback, indicating a proximity of the cursor to the one or more objects.
There is further provided, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention an apparatus, including a display, and a computer executing a non-tactile three dimensional (3D) user interface, and configured to receive a first set of multiple 3D coordinates representing a gesture performed by a user positioned within a field of view of a sensing device coupled to the computer, the first set of 3D coordinates including multiple points in a fixed 3D coordinate system local to the sensing device, and to transform the first set of multiple 3D coordinates to a second set of corresponding multiple 3D coordinates in a subjective 3D coordinate system local to the user.
There is additionally provided, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention an apparatus, including a display, and a computer executing a non-tactile three dimensional (3D) user interface, and configured to receive a set of multiple 3D coordinates representing a gesture performed by a limb of a user positioned within a field of view of a sensing device coupled to the computer, the set of 3D coordinates including first multiple points measured in a fixed 3D coordinate system local to the sensing device, and to transform any of the first multiple points that indicate the limb moving along a depth axis local to the sensing device to corresponding second multiple points along a depth axis local to the user, upon the set of multiple 3D coordinates indicating that a motion of a joint associated with the limb exceeds a specified threshold.
There is also provided, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention an apparatus, including a display, and a computer executing a non-tactile three dimensional (3D) user interface, and configured to present a cursor in proximity to one or more items on the display, to receive a set of multiple 3D coordinates representing a gesture performed by a body part of a user being positioned within a field of view of a sensing device coupled to the computer, to calculate a ratio between a first size of the cursor and a second size of the body part, and to position the cursor responsively to the received set of multiple coordinates in proportion to the calculated ratio.
There is alternatively provided, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention an apparatus, including a display, and a computer executing a non-tactile three dimensional (3D) user interface, and configured to present an interactive cursor in proximity to one or more items on the display, to receive a set of multiple 3D coordinates representing a gesture performed by a user positioned within a field of view of a sensing device coupled to the computer, to position the interactive cursor responsively to the received set of multiple coordinates, and to convey feedback, indicating a proximity of the cursor to the one or more objects.
There is also provided, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention a computer software product including a non-transitory computer-readable medium, in which program instructions are stored, which instructions, when read by a computer executing a non-tactile three dimensional user interface, cause the computer to receive a first set of multiple 3D coordinates representing a gesture performed by a user positioned within a field of view of a sensing device coupled to the computer, the first set of 3D coordinates including multiple points in a fixed 3D coordinate system local to the sensing device, and to transform the first set of multiple 3D coordinates to a second set of corresponding multiple 3D coordinates in a subjective 3D coordinate system local to the user.
There is additionally provided, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention a computer software product including a non-transitory computer-readable medium, in which program instructions are stored, which instructions, when read by a computer executing a non-tactile three dimensional user interface, cause the computer to receive a set of multiple 3D coordinates representing a gesture performed by a limb of a user positioned within a field of view of a sensing device coupled to the computer, the set of 3D coordinates including first multiple points measured in a fixed 3D coordinate system local to the sensing device, and to transform any of the first multiple points that indicate the limb moving along a depth axis local to the sensing device to corresponding second multiple points along a depth axis local to the user, upon the set of multiple 3D coordinates indicating that a motion of a joint associated with the limb exceeds a specified threshold.
There is further provided, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention a computer software product including a non-transitory computer-readable medium, in which program instructions are stored, which instructions, when read by a computer executing a non-tactile three dimensional user interface, cause the computer to present a cursor in proximity to one or more items on a display, to receive a set of multiple 3D coordinates representing a gesture performed by a body part of a user being positioned within a field of view of a sensing device coupled to the computer, to calculate a ratio between a first size of the cursor and a second size of the body part, and to position the cursor responsively to the received set of multiple coordinates in proportion to the calculated ratio.
There is alternatively provided, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention a computer software product including a non-transitory computer-readable medium, in which program instructions are stored, which instructions, when read by a computer executing a non-tactile three dimensional user interface, cause the computer to present an interactive cursor in proximity to one or more items on a display, to receive a set of multiple 3D coordinates representing a gesture performed by a user positioned within a field of view of a sensing device coupled to the computer, to position the interactive cursor responsively to the received set of multiple coordinates, and to convey feedback, indicating a proximity of the cursor to the one or more objects.
The disclosure is herein described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings, wherein:
When using a tactile physical input device such as a mouse, a user typically manipulates the physical device in a two-dimensional plane comprising a horizontal X-axis and a vertical Y-axis. However, when interacting with a non-tactile 3D user interface, the user may perform gestures in mid-air, and perform the gestures from different positions within a field of view of a 3D sensor coupled to the interface.
As the user performs a gesture, the 3D sensor conveys, to the non-tactile 3D user interface, a signal indicating a first set of multiple 3D coordinates representing the gesture. Typically, the 3D sensor is stationary and the user may be positioned at different locations and/or orientations (i.e., relative to the 3D sensor) while performing the gesture. The first set of multiple 3D coordinates may be considered to be measured in a first coordinate system local to the 3d sensor. The first coordinate system is typically a fixed coordinate system, with the 3D sensor defining an origin for a horizontal axis, a vertical axis and a depth axis.
Depending on the user's position relative to the 3D sensor, axes of a subjective coordinate system, as perceived by the user, may not align with the axes of the fixed coordinate system. Therefore, it may be difficult to identify a performed gesture from the coordinates measured by the 3D sensor. For example, the user may perform a “wave” gesture, by moving a hand along the subjective coordinate system's horizontal axis. However, the 3D sensor's measured coordinates may indicate movement along the horizontal axis and the depth axis of the sensor's fixed coordinate system, if the two sets of axes are misaligned.
Embodiments of the present invention provide methods and systems for transforming between a first fixed coordinate system of a 3D sensor coupled to a computer and a second subjective coordinate system local to the user. Since the user may perform gestures from different positions, the subjective coordinate system is typically a “moving” or variable coordinate system, with the user defining an origin for a horizontal axis, a vertical axis and a depth axis. Typically, the origin and the directions of the horizontal, the vertical and the depth axes of the moving coordinate system may change, as the user changes position within the 3D sensor's field of view.
In some embodiments, the transformation is based on a position (i.e., location and orientation) of the user relative to the 3D sensor. Additionally or alternatively, the transformation may allow for the position of the 3D sensor in relation to room parameters (e.g., the 3D sensor may be positioned at an angle not parallel to the room's floor). Using embodiments of the present invention described herein, the non-tactile 3D user interface can simulate the second coordinate system local to the user, and therefore interpret user gestures with greater accuracy.
While interacting with traditional two-dimensional (2D) user interfaces, the physical devices described supra typically convey tactile feedback to the user. However, while interacting with a 3D user interface, the user may perform gestures without engaging any physical device, and therefore not receive any tactile feedback. Embodiments of the present invention provide methods and systems for conveying visual and/or audio feedback to the user, thereby compensating for the lack of tactile feedback.
Coordinate transformations described herein can be used by the non-tactile 3D user Interface when presenting and positioning user interface elements on a display such as a cursor (as described in detail hereinbelow), a ZoomGrid control scheme, a joystick user interface, a horizontal bar user interface, and a sessionless pointing user interface. The ZoomGrid control scheme is described in U.S. Provisional Patent Application 61/521,448, filed Aug. 9, 2011, which is incorporated herein by reference. The joystick user interface and the horizontal bar user interface are described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/161,508, filed Jun. 16, 2011, which is incorporated herein by reference. The sessionless pointing user interface is described in U.S. Provisional Patent Application 61/526,692, filed Aug. 24, 2011, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Computer 26, executing 3D user interface 20, processes data generated by device 24 in order to reconstruct a 3D map of user 22. The term “3D map” refers to a set of 3D coordinates measured with reference to a fixed set of axes in space based on device 24. The 3D coordinates represent the surface of a given object, in this case the user's body. In one embodiment, device 24 projects a pattern of spots onto the object and captures an image of the projected pattern. Computer 26 then computes the 3D coordinates of points on the surface of the user's body by triangulation, based on transverse shifts of the spots in the pattern. Methods and devices for this sort of triangulation-based 3D mapping using a projected pattern are described, for example, in PCT International Publications WO 2007/043036, WO 2007/105205 and WO 2008/120217, whose disclosures are incorporated herein by reference. Alternatively, interface 20 may use other methods of 3D mapping, using single or multiple cameras or other types of sensors, as are known in the art.
Computer 26 typically comprises a general-purpose computer processor, which is programmed in software to carry out the functions described hereinbelow. The software may be downloaded to the processor in electronic form, over a network, for example, or it may alternatively be provided on tangible media, such as optical, magnetic, or electronic memory media. Alternatively or additionally, some or all of the functions of the image processor may be implemented in dedicated hardware, such as a custom or semi-custom integrated circuit or a programmable digital signal processor (DSP). Although computer 26 is shown in
As another alternative, these processing functions may be carried out by a suitable processor that is integrated with display 28 (in a television set, for example) or with any other suitable sort of computerized device, such as a game console or media player. The sensing functions of device 24 may likewise be integrated into the computer or other computerized apparatus that is to be controlled by the sensor output.
As user 22 performs physical gestures, embodiments of the present invention combine the methods described hereinbelow to transform a first set of coordinates in a fixed coordinate system (local to sensing device 24) to a second set of coordinates in a subjective coordinate system (local to user 22). The first set of coordinates is based on signals received from 3D sensing device 24 while user 22 performs the gesture. In embodiments of the invention described herein, the fixed coordinate system comprises a generally horizontal X-axis, a generally vertical Y-axis and a depth Z-axis, the X, Y and Z axes being mutually orthogonal Cartesian axes in space, typically with an origin at device 24.
The subjective coordinate system may comprise a generally horizontal X′-axis, a generally vertical Y′-axis and a depth Z′-axis, the axes also being mutually orthogonal Cartesian axes, and having an origin in the vicinity of the user. In some embodiments, the subjective coordinate system may use coordinate systems other than those with Cartesian axes, such as spherical or cylindrical coordinate systems.
The coordinate transformations described hereinbelow enable computer 26 to interpret the gestures with greater accuracy. The transformations can help compensate for differences in the physical positioning of 3D sensing device 24, and for differences in the location and orientation of user 22 relative to the 3D sensing device. The coordinate transformations utilized by computer 26 that are described hereinbelow include:
Additional coordinate transformations that can be utilized by computer 26 in embodiments of the present invention include but are not limited to a parabolic transformation, an elliptic transformation, a Gaussian transformation, a multi-section planar transformation, a spline transformation and a nurbs transformation.
While positioned within field of view 52 and interacting with user interface 20, the subjective coordinate system comprises a Z′-axis 58 that is assumed to be substantially parallel to floor 56. Embodiments of the present invention determine a vertical tilt, which comprises a vertical angle 60 between Z-axis 54 and Z′-axis 58.
In some embodiments (i.e., in transformation step 42), computer 26 determines vertical angle 60 based on vertical reference data collected during a pre-calibration step. For example, computer 26 may track and analyze a pose of user 22, and use the pose as a vertical reference. Additionally or alternatively, computer 26 may use surfaces in room 50, such as floor 56, a ceiling 62 and a wall (not shown) as references. Further alternatively, 3D sensing device 24 may include an accelerometer configured to detect vertical angle 60, and convey a signal indicating the vertical angle to computer 26. Upon determining vertical angle 60, computer 26 can store the vertical angle to a calibration matrix, which can be used to transform coordinates on Z-axis 54 to coordinates on Z′-axis 58.
If 3D sensing device 24 and display 28 are substantially aligned horizontally, and horizontal field of view 70 is known, then computer 26 can determine a horizontal angle 76 between Z′-axis 72 and Z-axis 54, by methods generally similar to those described with reference to
The description above illustrates that, in general, values of vertical angle 60 and horizontal angle 76 enable transformation between the fixed depth axis defined with respect to device 24 and the subjective depth axis defined with respect to user 22.
As user 22 performs gestures with hand 30, the actual motion of the hand is typically influenced by various joints in the user's body, including wrist 80, elbow 82 and shoulder 84. For example, while a wave gesture may be defined as moving hand back and forth horizontally (i.e., side-to-side), the hand may actually move along an arc 86 due to a rotation of the joints. Likewise, while performing a push focus gesture or a touch gesture (described in further detail hereinbelow), where hand 30 moves forward and backward relative to user 22, the direction of the forward and the backward motion may depend on the location and orientation of the user (i.e., relative to sensing device 24), and the location of hand 30 along arc 86. The forward and backward motion is typically substantially perpendicular to arc 86, as indicated by arrows 88. The push focus gesture and the wave gesture are described in U.S. Provisional Patent Application 61/422,239, filed on Dec. 13, 2010, which is incorporated herein by reference.
While the example in
As user 22 performs a gesture, embodiments of the present invention enable computer 26 to transform a first set of Cartesian coordinates received from sensing device 24 to a second set of spherical coordinates in a subjective spherical coordinate system local to user 22. Transforming the Cartesian coordinates to the spherical coordinates is referred to herein as a spherical deformation.
In some embodiments, the spherical deformation typically involves computer 26 measuring spherical coordinates along a non-linear arc 86 with respect to a reference point 90, where the reference point comprises a center of arc 86, in proximity to user 22. In some embodiments, since reference point 90 comprises the center of arc 86, coordinates on the arc may be assumed to be substantially equidistant from the reference point.
In additional embodiments, computer 26 may select reference point 90 based on the user's physical dimensions and current pose (e.g., standing, sitting or leaning back), since the location of reference point 90 may depend on the particular body joint performing the majority of the motion during a gesture. For example, if user 22 is standing, computer 26 may set reference point 90 to be a location corresponding to shoulder 84. Alternatively, computer 26 may set reference point 90 to be a location corresponding to elbow 82 when the user is sitting. Additionally, computer 26 may adjust the distance that hand 30 needs to move while performing a gesture based on the user's current pose. For example, while performing a side-to-side wave gesture, user 22 may move hand 30 a greater distance when standing than when sitting.
In alternative embodiments, upon user 22 performing a push focus gesture, computer 26 may select reference point 90 as a specific distance 92 (typically between 50 and 70 centimeters) behind the user. After selecting reference point 90, computer can calculate a radius 94 as a distance measured between reference point 90 and a location where user 22 extended hand 30 while performing the push focus gesture.
In further embodiments, computer 26 may store parameters such as reference point 90 and radius 94 as spherical deformation parameters for a spherical function configured to transform the first set of Cartesian coordinates to the second set of spherical coordinates.
To interact with user interface 20, user 22 typically performs gestures by moving hand 30 along X′-Y′ plane 10 and Z′-axis 102. While interacting with user interface 20, user 22 may manipulate items 108, 110 and 112 that computer 26 presents on screen 28. In some embodiments, items 108, 110 and 112 may comprise icons and buttons similar to those found on traditional two dimensional (2D) user interfaces. Examples of gestures performed by user 22 include:
In operation, user 22 typically manipulates cursor 114 by moving hand 30 along an X′-Y′ plane 100 until the cursor passes over and highlights item 110. The manipulation corresponds to the Find gesture described above. Once computer 26 highlights item 110, user 22 can move hand 30 forward along Z′-axis 102 to a reference touch point 116, thereby “touching” (i.e., selecting) the highlighted item. However, while moving hand 30 along Z′-axis 102, user 22 may also unintentionally move hand 30 along X′-Y′ plane 100.
As shown in
When user 22 performs a Find gesture followed by a Touch gesture, computer 26 may detect a slight pause as hand 30 changes direction (i.e., from a side-to-side motion to a forward and backward motion). In some embodiments, computer 26 may assign less significance to any motion in X′-Y′ plane 100, upon detecting a slight pause between motion primarily in X′-Y′ plane 100 and motion primarily along Z′-axis 102. Additionally, computer 26 may reposition reference touch point 116 to a specific distance from a location where hand 30 transitioned from the Find gesture to the Touch gesture.
In some embodiments, computer 26 may employ an automatic learning algorithm to personalize user interface 20 to user 22. By continually observing the motion of hand 30, computer 26 can employ the automatic learning algorithm to estimate 3D coordinates of the gestures with greater accuracy. Additionally, since the majority of the hand-motion is typically in X′-Y′ plane 100, the learning algorithm can employ statistical methods to estimate any coordinate rotation along the X′-Y′ plane.
For example, when user 22 performs a push focus gesture, the automatic learning algorithm can calibrate computer 26 to the user's local Z′-axis based on the direction of the push focus gesture. Additionally or alternatively, if user 22 performs a wave gesture, then the automatic learning algorithm can calibrate computer 26 to the user's local X′-axis.
In further embodiments, computer 26 may prompt user 22 to perform specific gestures that manually calibrate the user interface to the user's local X′-axis, Y′-axis and Z′-axis. Examples of manual calibration operations include
As discussed supra, computer 26 employs vertical axis coordinate transformations, horizontal axis coordinate transformations, spherical coordinate transformations, and X′-Y′ plane 100 convergence in order to transform a first set of 3D coordinates in a fixed 3D coordinate system local to sensing device 24 to a second set of corresponding multiple 3D coordinates in a subjective 3D coordinate system local to the user. In operation, computer 26 may utilize one or more of the transformations described hereinabove.
In some embodiments computer 26 may execute the aforementioned transformations sequentially as follows:
While performing the Find gesture, user 22 may unintentionally move hand 30 along the depth Z′-axis local to the user. For example, if the user is sitting on a chair, rests an elbow on the chair's armrest, and performs an up-and-down Find gesture, the hand will typically move along arc 86 (that includes local Z-axis coordinates) due to a rotation of the elbow joint.
In some embodiments, computer 26 performs a subjective Z-axis coordinate transformation by differentiating between intentional and unintentional motion of the hand 30 along the depth Z′-axis local to the user by using associated elbow 82 (i.e., the right elbow when moving the right hand, and the left elbow when moving the left hand) of the user as a reference when determining the significance of the hand's motion on the local Z′-axis.
For example, if user 22 keeps elbow 82 relatively stationary while performing a Find gesture, then computer 26 may assign less significance to the hand's motion detected on the local Z′-axis. However, if user 22 moves elbow 82 while performing the Touch gesture, then computer 26 may assign greater significance to the hand's motion detected on the local Z′-axis. In other words, if user 22 raises elbow 82 while moving hand 30 forward, then embodiments of the present invention can assume that the user is intentionally moving the hand forward along the local Z′-axis.
While hand 30 performs a Find gesture, computer 26 receives a signal from 3D sensing device 24 indicating a motion performed by hand 30 and its associated elbow 82, where the signal comprises a multiple 3D coordinates indicating first multiple points in the subjective coordinate system. If the received multiple 3D coordinates indicate movement of elbow 82 along Z′-axis 58 to be within a specified threshold (e.g., two centimeters) while hand 30 moves along arc 86, then the computer may assign less significance to the hand's motion along Z′-axis 58. In other words, as user 22 performs a Find gesture (i.e., and the motion of elbow 82 is within the specified threshold), computer 26 may not transform the first multiple points in the first set of 3D coordinates indicating hand 30 moving along Z-axis 54 to corresponding second multiple points on Z′-axis 58.
While hand 30 performs a Touch gesture, computer 26 receives a signal from 3D sensing device 24 indicating a motion performed by hand 30 and its associated elbow 82, where the signal comprises multiple 3D coordinates indicating first multiple points in the subjective coordinate system. If the received multiple 3D coordinates indicate movement of elbow 82 along Z′-axis 58 to be greater than the specified threshold while hand 30 moves along arc 86, then the computer may assign greater significance to the hand's motion along Z′-axis 58. In other words, as user 22 performs a Touch gesture (i.e., and the motion of elbow 82 is greater the specified threshold), computer 26 may transform the first multiple points in the first set of 3D coordinates indicating hand 30 moving along Z-axis 54 to corresponding second multiple points on Z′-axis 58.
Although the examples shown in
Although user 22 may perform three-dimensional gestures while interacting with user interface 20, visual feedback is typically presented in two dimensions on display 28. Conveying effective visual and/or audio feedback to user 22 enhances the ability of the user to interact with user interface 20. Embodiments of the present invention described hereinbelow present various cursor configurations on display 28 that convey visual feedback to user 22. In some embodiments, computer 26 may convey audio feedback to user 22 while the user interacts with the user interface.
As described supra, computer 26 receives signals from 3D sensing device 24 indicating a first set of coordinates representing a gesture performed by user 22, using hand 30. Upon receiving the first set of coordinates, which are in a fixed coordinate system local to sensing device 24, computer 26 may then transform the received coordinates to a second set of coordinates that are in a moving coordinate system local to user 22. Embodiments of the present invention convey feedback indicating the hand's proximity to reference touch point 116 along depth Z′-axis 102 in the coordinate system local to user (
Upon hand 30 reaching reference touch point 116, computer may present a visual effect, such as flashing different colors within ring cursor 120, thereby enabling user 22 to realize that the hand has reached the reference touch point. Likewise, as user 22 retracts hand 30 back away from reference touch point 116, computer 26 may gray out the ring cursor.
In some embodiments, computer 26 may change the configuration of ring cursor 120 as user 22 extends hand 30 beyond reference touch point 116. In the configuration shown in
In a presentation step 140, computer 26 presents hand cursor 150 on display 28, where the hand cursor is in proximity to one or more items (e.g., icons) also presented on the display. In a receive step 142, computer 26 receives a set of multiple 3D coordinates representing a gesture that user 22 performs using hand 30, and in a calculation step 144, the computer calculates a ratio between the size of hand cursor 150 and the measured size of the hand. In a presentation step 146, computer 26 positions hand cursor responsively to the received coordinates in proportion to the calculated ratio, and the method continues with step 142.
In the example shown in
In some embodiments, computer 26 can present hand cursor 150 as a semi-realistic hand, and change the hand cursor's appearance as user 22 moves hand 30 along Z′-axis 102. By changing the appearance of hand cursor 150, computer 26 can convey visual feedback to user 22. For example, as user 22 performs a Touch gesture to “push” button icon 152, computer 26 can present hand cursor 150 with one or more fingers bent back.
In an alternative embodiment, computer 26 can present a combination of ring cursor 120 and hand cursor 150 on display 28. Hand cursor 150 can provide depth feedback by altering the size of the hand cursor based on the position of hand 30 along Z′ axis 102, and ring cursor 120 can provide feedback to the hand's location on X′-Y′ plane 100. Maintaining the size of ring cursor 120 constant conveys feedback while the user positions hand 30 on X′-Y′ plane 100 (e.g., positioning the hand to engage a specific icon). Alternatively, user interface can present visual effects such as crosshairs in the ring cursor or glowing fingertips in the hand cursor to help user 30 position hand 30 on X′-Y′ plane 100.
While
In a presentation step 160, computer 26 presents interactive cursor 170 in proximity to items 172. In a receive step 162, computer 26 receives a set of 3D coordinates representing a gesture performed by user 22, and in a presentation step 164, the computer presents interactive cursor 170 responsively to the received coordinates. In a convey step 166, computer 26 conveys, via interactive cursor 170, feedback indicating the interactive cursor's proximity to a particular item 172, and the method continues with step 162.
In a feedback step 166, computer 26 conveys feedback (e.g., visual feedback) indicating the interactive cursor's interaction with items 172. In the example shown in
In addition to visual feedback, computer 26 can convey audio feedback to user 22 while the user interacts with the user interface. Conveying audio feedback can help compensate for the lack of tactile feedback in user interface 20. Examples of audio feedback include:
It will be appreciated that the embodiments described above are cited by way of example, and that the present invention is not limited to what has been particularly shown and described hereinabove. Rather, the scope of the present invention includes both combinations and subcombinations of the various features, including the transformations and the manipulations, described hereinabove, as well as variations and modifications thereof which would occur to persons skilled in the art upon reading the foregoing description and which are not disclosed in the prior art.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application 61/420,809, filed Dec. 8, 2010, U.S. Provisional Patent Application 61/448,670, filed Mar. 3, 2011, and U.S. Provisional Patent Application 61/538,970, filed Sep. 26, 2011, which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4550250 | Mueller et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4789921 | Aho | Dec 1988 | A |
4988981 | Zimmerman et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5264836 | Rubin | Nov 1993 | A |
5495576 | Ritchey | Feb 1996 | A |
5588139 | Lanier et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5594469 | Freeman et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5846134 | Latypov | Dec 1998 | A |
5852672 | Lu | Dec 1998 | A |
5862256 | Zetts et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5864635 | Zetts et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5870196 | Lulli et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5917937 | Szeliski et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5973700 | Taylor et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6002808 | Freeman | Dec 1999 | A |
6005548 | Latypov et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6064387 | Canaday et al. | May 2000 | A |
6072494 | Nguyen | Jun 2000 | A |
6084979 | Kanade et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6111580 | Kazama et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6191773 | Maruno et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6215890 | Matsuo et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6243054 | DeLuca | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6252988 | Ho | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6256033 | Nguyen | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6262740 | Lauer et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6345111 | Yamaguchi et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6345893 | Fateh et al. | Feb 2002 | B2 |
6452584 | Walker et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6456262 | Bell | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6507353 | Huard et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6512838 | Rafii et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6519363 | Su et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6559813 | DeLuca et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6681031 | Cohen et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6686921 | Rushmeier et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6690370 | Ellenby et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6741251 | Malzbender | May 2004 | B2 |
6791540 | Baumberg | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6803928 | Bimber et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6853935 | Satoh et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6857746 | Dyner | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6951515 | Ohshima et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6977654 | Malik et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7003134 | Covell et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7013046 | Kawamura et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7023436 | Segawa et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7042440 | Pryor et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7042442 | Kanevsky et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7151530 | Roeber et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7170492 | Bell | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7215815 | Honda | May 2007 | B2 |
7227526 | Hildreth et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7257237 | Luck et al. | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7259747 | Bell | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7264554 | Bentley | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7289227 | Smetak et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7289645 | Yamamoto et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7295697 | Satoh | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7301648 | Foxlin | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7302099 | Zhang et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7333113 | Gordon | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7340077 | Gokturk | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7348963 | Bell | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7358972 | Gordon et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7370883 | Basir et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7427996 | Yonezawa et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7428542 | Fink et al. | Sep 2008 | B1 |
7474256 | Ohta et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7508377 | Pihlaja et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7526120 | Gokturk et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7536032 | Bell | May 2009 | B2 |
7573480 | Gordon | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7576727 | Bell | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7580572 | Bang et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7590941 | Wee et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7688998 | Tuma et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7696876 | Dimmer et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7724250 | Ishii et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7762665 | Vertegaal et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7774155 | Sato et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7812842 | Gordon | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7821541 | Delean | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7840031 | Albertson et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7844914 | Andre et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7925549 | Looney et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7971156 | Albertson et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8154781 | Kroll et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8166421 | Magal et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8183977 | Matsumoto | May 2012 | B2 |
8194921 | Kongqiao et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8214098 | Murray et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8218211 | Kroll et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8368647 | Lin | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8405604 | Pryor et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8416276 | Kroll et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8446459 | Fang et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8448083 | Migos et al. | May 2013 | B1 |
8462199 | Givon | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8514221 | King et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8514251 | Hildreth et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8625882 | Backlund et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
20020057383 | Iwamura | May 2002 | A1 |
20020071607 | Kawamura et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020158873 | Williamson | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030057972 | Pfaff et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030063775 | Rafii et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030088463 | Kanevsky | May 2003 | A1 |
20030156756 | Gokturk et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030185444 | Honda | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030227453 | Beier et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030235341 | Gokturk et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040046744 | Rafii et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040104935 | Williamson | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040135744 | Bimber et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040155962 | Marks | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040174770 | Rees | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040183775 | Bell | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040184640 | Bang et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040184659 | Bang et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040193413 | Wilson et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040258314 | Hashimoto | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050031166 | Fujimura et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050088407 | Bell et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050089194 | Bell | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050110964 | Bell et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050122308 | Bell et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050162381 | Bell et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050190972 | Thomas et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050254726 | Fuchs et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050265583 | Covell et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060010400 | Dehlin et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060092138 | Kim et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060110008 | Vertegaal et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060115155 | Lui et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060139314 | Bell | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060149737 | Du et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060159344 | Shao et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060187196 | Underkoffler et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060239670 | Cleveland | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060248475 | Abrahamsson | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070078552 | Rosenberg | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070130547 | Boillot | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070154116 | Shieh | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070230789 | Chang et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070285554 | Givon | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080030460 | Hildreth et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080062123 | Bell | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080094371 | Forstall et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080123940 | Kundu et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080150890 | Bell et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080150913 | Bell et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080170776 | Albertson et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080236902 | Imaizumi | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080252596 | Bell et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080256494 | Greenfield | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080260250 | Vardi | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080281583 | Slothouber et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080287189 | Rabin | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090009593 | Cameron et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090027335 | Ye | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090027337 | Hildreth | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090031240 | Hildreth | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090040215 | Afzulpurkar et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090073117 | Tsurumi et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090077504 | Bell | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090078473 | Overgard et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090083122 | Angell et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090083622 | Chien et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090096783 | Shpunt et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090183125 | Magal et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090195392 | Zalewski | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090228841 | Hildreth | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090256817 | Perlin et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090284542 | Baar et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090297028 | De Haan | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100002936 | Khomo et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100007717 | Spektor et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100034457 | Berliner et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100036717 | Trest | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100053151 | Marti et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100071965 | Hu et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100083189 | Arlein et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100103106 | Chui | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100149096 | Migos et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100164897 | Morin et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100177933 | Willmann et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100199228 | Latta et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100199231 | Markovic et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100234094 | Gagner et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100235786 | Meizels et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100295781 | Alameh et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110006978 | Yuan | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110007035 | Shai | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110018795 | Jang | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110029918 | Yoo et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110052006 | Gurman et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110081072 | Kawasaki et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110087970 | Swink et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110144543 | Tsuzuki et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110164032 | Shadmi | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110164141 | Tico et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110193939 | Vassigh et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110211754 | Litvak et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110225536 | Shams et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110227820 | Haddick et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110231757 | Haddick et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110242102 | Hess | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110248914 | Sherr | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110254765 | Brand | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110254798 | Adamson et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110260965 | Kim et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110261058 | Luo | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110279397 | Rimon et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110291926 | Gokturk et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110292036 | Sali et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110293137 | Gurman et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110296353 | Ahmed et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110310010 | Hoffnung et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120001875 | Li et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120038550 | Lemmey et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120078614 | Galor et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120117514 | Kim et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120169583 | Rippel et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120202569 | Maizels et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120204133 | Guendelman et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120223882 | Galor et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120249416 | Maciocci et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120268369 | Kikkeri | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120275680 | Omi | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120313848 | Galor et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120320080 | Giese et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130002801 | Mock | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130014052 | Frey et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130044053 | Galor et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130055120 | Galor et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130055150 | Galor | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130058565 | Rafii et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130106692 | Maizels et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130107021 | Maizels et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130155070 | Luo | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130207920 | McCann et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20140108930 | Asnis | Apr 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
9935633 | Jul 1999 | WO |
03071410 | Aug 2003 | WO |
2004107272 | Dec 2004 | WO |
2005003948 | Jan 2005 | WO |
2005094958 | Oct 2005 | WO |
2007043036 | Apr 2007 | WO |
2007078639 | Jul 2007 | WO |
2007105205 | Sep 2007 | WO |
2007132451 | Nov 2007 | WO |
2007135376 | Nov 2007 | WO |
2008120217 | Oct 2008 | WO |
2012011044 | Jan 2012 | WO |
2012020380 | Feb 2012 | WO |
2012107892 | Aug 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Ross Miller, “Kinect for Xbox 360 review”, Nov. 4, 2010, Engadget. |
International Application PCT/IB2012/050577 Search Report dated Aug. 6, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/683,452 Official Action dated Sep. 7, 2012. |
Koutek, M., “Scientific Visualization in Virtual Reality: Interaction Techniques and Application Development”, PhD Thesis, Delft University of Technology, 264 pages, Jan. 2003. |
Azuma et al., “Recent Advances in Augmented Reality”, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, vol. 21, issue 6, pp. 34-47, Nov. 2001. |
Breen et al., “Interactive Occlusion and Collision of Real and Virtual Objects in Augmented Reality”, Technical Report ECRC-95-02, ECRC, Munich, Germany, 22 pages, year 1995. |
Burdea et al., “A Distributed Virtual Environment with Dextrous Force Feedback”, Proceedings of Interface to Real and Virtual Worlds Conference, pp. 255-265, Mar. 1992. |
Gargallo et al., “Bayesian 3D Modeling from Images Using Multiple Depth Maps”, Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05), vol. 2, pp. 885-891, Jun. 20-25, 2005. |
Gobbetti et al., “VB2: an Architecture for Interaction in Synthetic Worlds”, Proceedings of the 6th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST'93), pp. 167-178, Nov. 3-5, 1993. |
Ohta et al., “Share-Z: Client/Server Depth Sensing for See-Through Head-Mounted Displays”, Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 176-188, Apr. 2002. |
Schmalstieg et al., “The Studierstube Augmented Reality Project”, Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 33-54, Feb. 2002. |
Sun et al., “SRP Based Natural Interaction Between Real and Virtual Worlds in Augmented Reality”, Proceedings of the International Conference on Cyberworlds (CW'08), pp. 117-124, Sep. 22-24, 2008. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/541,786, filed Jul. 5, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/592,352, filed Aug. 23, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/584,831, filed Aug. 14, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/592,369, filed Aug. 23, 2012. |
Bleiwess et al., “Fusing Time-of-Flight Depth and Color for Real-Time Segmentation and Tracking”, Dyn3D 2009, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 5742, pp. 58-69, Jena, Germany, Sep. 9, 2009. |
Bleiwess et al., “Markerless Motion Capture Using a Single Depth Sensor”, SIGGRAPH Asia 2009, Yokohama, Japan, Dec. 16-19, 2009. |
Bevilacqua et al., “People Tracking Using a Time-Of-Flight Depth Sensor”, Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Video and Signal Based Surveillance, Sydney, Australia, Nov. 22-24, 2006. |
Bradski, G., “Computer Vision Face Tracking for Use in a Perceptual User Interface”, Intel Technology Journal, vol. 2, issue 2 (2nd Quarter 2008). |
Comaniciu et al., “Kernel-Based Object Tracking”, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 25, No. 5, pp. 564-577, May 2003. |
Gesturetec Inc., “Gesture Control Solutions for Consumer Devices”, Canada, 2009. |
Gokturk et al., “A Time-Of-Flight Depth Sensor—System Description, Issues and Solutions”, Proceedings of the 2004 Conference on Computer Vision and Patter Recognition Workshop (CVPRW'04), vol. 3, pp. 35, Jun. 27-Jul. 2, 2004. |
Grest et al., “Single View Motion Tracking by Depth and Silhouette Information”, SCIA 2007—Scandinavian Conference on Image Analysis, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 4522, pp. 719-729, Aalborg, Denmark, Jun. 10-14, 2007. |
Haritaoglu et al., “Ghost 3d: Detecting Body Posture and Parts Using Stereo”, Proceedings of the IEEE Workshop on Motion and Video Computing (Motion'02), pp. 175-180, Orlando, USA, Dec. 5-6, 2002. |
Haritaoglu et al., “W4S : A real-time system for detecting and tracking people in 2<1/2>D”, ECCV 98—5th European conference on computer vision, vol. 1407, pp. 877-892, Freiburg , Germany, Jun. 2-6, 1998. |
Harville, M., “Stereo Person Tracking with Short and Long Term Plan-View Appearance Models of Shape and Color”, Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Advanced Video and Signal-Based Surveillance (AVSSS—2005), pp. 522-527, Como, Italy, Sep. 15-16, 2005. |
Holte, M., “Fusion of Range and Intensity Information for View Invariant Gesture Recognition”, IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW '08), pp. 1-7, Anchorage, USA, Jun. 23-28, 2008. |
Kaewtrakulpong et al., “An Improved Adaptive Background Mixture Model for Real-Time Tracking with Shadow Detection”, Proceedings of the 2nd European Workshop on Advanced Video Based Surveillance Systems (AVBS'01), Kingston, UK, Sep. 2001. |
Kolb et al., “ToF-Sensors: New Dimensions for Realism and Interactivity”, Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Patter Recognition Workshops, pp. 1-6, Anchorage, USA, Jun. 23-28, 2008. |
Kolsch et al., “Fast 2D Hand Tracking with Flocks of Features and Multi-Cue Integration”, IEEE Workshop on Real-Time Vision for Human Computer Interaction (at CVPR'04), Washington, USA, Jun. 27-Jul. 2, 2004. |
Krumm et al., “Multi-Camera Multi-Person Tracking for EasyLiving”, 3rd IEEE International Workshop on Visual Surveillance, Dublin, Ireland, Jul. 1, 2000. |
Leens et al., “Combining Color, Depth, and Motion for Video Segmentation”, ICVS 2009—7th International Conference on Computer Vision Systems, Liege, Belgium Oct. 13-15, 2009. |
MacCormick et al., “Partitioned Sampling, Articulated Objects, and Interface-Quality Hand Tracking”, ECCV '00—Proceedings of the 6th European Conference on Computer Vision-Part II , pp. 3-19, Dublin, Ireland, Jun. 26-Jul. 1, 2000. |
Malassiotis et al., “Real-Time Hand Posture Recognition Using Range Data”, Image and Vision Computing, vol. 26, No. 7, pp. 1027-1037, Jul. 2, 2008. |
Morano et al., “Structured Light Using Pseudorandom Codes”, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 20, issue 3, pp. 322-327, Mar. 1998. |
Munoz-Salinas et al., “People Detection and Tracking Using Stereo Vision and Color”, Image and Vision Computing, vol. 25, No. 6, pp. 995-1007, Jun. 1, 2007. |
Nanda et al., “Visual Tracking Using Depth Data”, Proceedings of the 2004 Conference on Computer Vision and Patter Recognition Workshop, vol. 3, Washington, USA, Jun. 27-Jul. 2, 2004. |
Scharstein et al., “High-Accuracy Stereo Depth Maps Using Structured Light”, IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Patter Recognition, vol. 1, pp. 195-2002, Madison, USA, Jun. 2003. |
Shi et al., “Good Features to Track”, IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 593-600, Seattle, USA, Jun. 21-23, 1994. |
Siddiqui et al., “Robust Real-Time Upper Body Limb Detection and Tracking”, Proceedings of the 4th ACM International Workshop on Video Surveillance and Sensor Networks, Santa Barbara, USA, Oct. 27, 2006. |
Softkinetic S.A., IISU™—3D Gesture Recognition Platform for Developers of 3D Applications, Belgium, Brussels, 2007-2010. |
Sudderth et al., “Visual Hand Tracking Using Nonparametric Belief Propagation”, IEEE Workshop on Generative Model Based Vision at CVPR'04, Washington, USA, Jun. 27-Jul. 2, 2004. |
Tsap, L., “Gesture-Tracking in Real Time with Dynamic Regional Range Computation”, Real-Time Imaging, vol. 8, issue 2, pp. 115-126, Apr. 2002. |
Xu et al., “A Multi-Cue-Based Human Body Tracking System”, Proceedings of the 5ths International Conference on Computer Vision Systems (ICVS 2007), Germany, Mar. 21-24, 2007. |
Xu et al., “Human Detecting Using Depth and Gray Images”, Proceedings of the IEE Conference on Advanced Video and Signal Based Surveillance (AVSS'03), Miami, USA, Jul. 21-22, 2003. |
Yilmaz et al., “Object Tracking: A Survey”, ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 38, No. 4, article 13, Dec. 2006. |
Zhu et al., “Controlled Human Pose Estimation From Depth Image Streams”, IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Patter Recognition Workshops, pp. 1-8, Anchorage, USA, Jun. 23-27, 2008. |
International Application PCT/IB2010/051055 Search Report dated Sep. 1, 2010. |
La Viola, J. Jr., “Whole-Hand and Speech Input in Virtual Environments”, Computer Science Department, Florida Atlantic University, USA, 1996. |
Martell, C., “Form: An Experiment in the Annotation of the Kinematics of Gesture”, Dissertation, Computer and Information Science, University of Pennsylvania, 2005. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/352,622 Official Action dated Mar. 31, 2011. |
Prime Sense Inc., “Prime Sensor™ Nite 1.1 Framework Programmer's Guide”, Version 1.2, year 2009. |
PrimeSense Corporation, “PrimeSensor Reference Design 1.08”, USA, year 2010. |
International Application PCT/IB2012/050577 filed on Feb. 9, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/615,403, filed Mar. 26, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/603,949, filed Feb. 28, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/525,771, filed Aug. 21, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/295,106, filed Nov. 14, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/538,970, filed Sep. 26, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/526,696, filed Aug. 24, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/526,692, filed Aug. 24, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/314,210, filed Dec. 8, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/352,622 Official Action dated Sep. 30, 2011. |
International Application PCT/IB2011/053192 Search Report dated Dec. 6, 2011. |
Hart, D., U.S. Appl. No. 09/616,606 “Method and System for High Resolution , Ultra Fast 3-D Imaging”, filed Jul. 14, 2000. |
International Application PCT/IL2007/000306 Search Report dated Oct. 2, 2008. |
International Application PCT/IL2007/000574 Search Report dated Sep. 10, 2008. |
International Application PCT/IL2006/000335 Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Apr. 24, 2008. |
Avidan et al., “Trajectory triangulation: 3D reconstruction of moving points from amonocular image sequence”, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (PAMI), vol. 22, No. 4, pp. 348-3537, Apr. 2000. |
Leclerc et al., “The direct computation of height from shading”, The Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 552-558, USA, Jun. 1991. |
Zhang et al., “Shape from intensity gradient”, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics-Part A: Systems and Humans, vol. 29, No. 3, pp. 318-325, May 1999. |
Zhang et al., “Height recovery from intensity gradients”, IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 508-513, Jun. 21-23, 1994. |
Horn, B., “Height and gradient from shading”, International Journal of Computer Vision, vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 37-76, Aug. 1990. |
Bruckstein, A., “On shape from shading”, Computer Vision, Graphics & Image Processing, vol. 44, pp. 139-154, year 1988. |
Zhang et al., “Rapid Shape Acquisition Using Color Structured Light and Multi-Pass Dynamic Programming”, 1st International Symposium on 3D Data Processing Visualization and Transmission (3DPVT), Italy, Jul. 2002. |
Besl, P., “Active, Optical Range Imaging Sensors”, Machine vision and applications, vol. 1, pp. 127-152, year 1988. |
Horn et al., “Toward optimal structured light patterns”, Proceedings of International Conference on Recent Advances in 3D Digital Imaging and Modeling, pp. 28-37, Ottawa, Canada, May 1997. |
Goodman, J.W., “Statistical Properties of Laser Speckle Patterns”, Laser Speckle and Related Phenomena, pp. 9-75, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 1975. |
Asada et al., “Determining Surface Orientation by Projecting a Stripe Pattern”, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (PAMI), vol. 10, No. 5, pp. 749-754, Sep. 1988. |
Winkelbach et al., “Shape from Single Stripe Pattern Illumination”, Luc Van Gool (Editor), (DAGM 2002), Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2449, p. 240-247, Springer 2002. |
Koninckx et al., “Efficient, Active 3D Acquisition, based on a Pattern-Specific Snake”, Luc Van Gool (Editor), (DAGM 2002), Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2449, pp. 557-565, Springer 2002. |
Kimmel et al., “Analyzing and synthesizing images by evolving curves with the Osher-Sethian method”, International Journal of Computer Vision, vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 37-56, year 1997. |
Zigelman et al., “Texture mapping using surface flattening via multi-dimensional scaling”, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 198-207, Apr. 2002. |
Dainty, J.C., “Introduction”, Laser Speckle and Related Phenomena, pp. 1-7, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 1975. |
Mendlovic et al., “Composite harmonic filters for scale, projection and shift invariant pattern recognition”, Applied Optics Journal, vol. 34, No. 2, Jan. 10, 1995. |
Fua et al., “Human Shape and Motion Recovery Using Animation Models”, 19th Congress, International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Jul. 2000. |
Allard et al., “Marker-less Real Time 3D modeling for Virtual Reality”, Immersive Projection Technology, Iowa State University, year 2004. |
Howe et al., “Bayesian Reconstruction of 3D Human Motion from Single-Camera Video”, Advanced in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 12, pp. 820-826, USA 1999. |
Li et al., “Real-Time 3D Motion Tracking with Known Geometric Models”, Real-Time Imaging Journal, vol. 5, pp. 167-187, Academic Press 1999. |
Grammalidis et al., “3-D Human Body Tracking from Depth Images Using Analysis by Synthesis”, Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP2001), pp. 185-188, Greece, Oct. 7-10, 2001. |
Segen et al., “Shadow gestures: 3D hand pose estimation using a single camera”, Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 479-485, Fort Collins, USA, 1999. |
Vogler et al., “ASL recognition based on a coupling between HMMs and 3D motion analysis”, Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 363-369, Mumbai, India, 1998. |
Nam et al., “Recognition of Hand Gestures with 3D, Nonlinear Arm Movements”, Pattern Recognition Letters, vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 105-113, Elsevier Science B.V. 1997. |
Nesbat, S., “A System for Fast, Full-Text Entry for Small Electronic Devices”, Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces, ICMI 2003, Vancouver, Nov. 5-7, 2003. |
Ascension Technology Corporation, “Flock of Birds: Real-Time Motion Tracking”, 2008. |
Segen et al., “Human-computer interaction using gesture recognition and 3D hand tracking”, ICIP 98, Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, vol. 3, pp. 188-192, Oct. 4-7, 1998. |
Dekker, L., “Building Symbolic Information for 3D Human Body Modeling from Range Data”, Proceedings of the Second International Conference on 3D Digital Imaging and Modeling, IEEE computer Society, pp. 388-397, 1999. |
Holte et al., “Gesture Recognition using a Range Camera”, Technical Report CVMT-07-01 ISSN 1601-3646, Feb. 2007. |
Cheng et al., “Articulated Human Body Pose Inference from Voxel Data Using a Kinematically Constrained Gaussian Mixture Model”, CVPR EHuM2: 2nd Workshop on Evaluation of Articulated Human Motion and Pose Estimation, 2007. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/523,404, filed Aug. 15, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/504,339, filed Jul. 5, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/521,448, filed Aug. 9, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/523,349, filed Aug. 14, 2011. |
PrimeSense, “Natural Interaction”, YouTube Presentation, Jun. 9, 2010 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TzLKsex43z1˜. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/423,322, filed Mar. 19, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/423,314, filed Mar. 19, 2012. |
Tobii Technology, “The World Leader in Eye Tracking and Gaze Interaction”, Mar. 2012. |
Noveron, “Madison video eyewear”, year 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/762,336 Official Action dated May 15, 2012. |
Manning et al., “Foundations of Statistical Natural Language Processing”, chapters 6,7,9 and 12, MIT Press 1999. |
Commission Regulation (EC) No. 1275/2008, Official Journal of the European Union, Dec. 17, 2008. |
Arm Ltd., “AMBA Specification: AHB”, Version 2, pp. 35-92, year 1999. |
PrimeSense Corporation, “PrimeSensor NITE 1.1”, USA, year 2010. |
Microvision Inc., “PicoP® Display Engine—How it Works”, 1996-2012. |
Gordon et al., “The use of Dense Stereo Range Date in Augmented Reality”, Proceedings of the 1st International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR), Darmstadt, Germany, pp. 1-10, Sep. 30-Oct. 1, 2002. |
Agrawala et al., “The two-user Responsive Workbench :support for collaboration through individual views of a shared space”, Proceedings on the 24th conference on computer graphics and interactive techniques (SIGGRAPH 97), Los Angeles, USA, pp. 327-332 , Aug. 3-8, 1997. |
Harman et al., “Rapid 2D-to 3D conversion”, Proceedings of SPIE Conference on Stereoscopic Displays and Virtual Reality Systems, vol. 4660, pp. 78-86, Jan. 21-23, 2002. |
Hoff et al., “Analysis of head pose accuracy in augmented reality”, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, vol. 6, No. 4, pp. 319-334, Oct.-Dec. 2000. |
Poupyrev et al., “The go-go interaction technique: non-liner mapping for direct manipulation in VR”, Proceedings of the 9th annual ACM Symposium on User interface software and technology (UIST '96), Washington, USA, pp. 79-80, Nov. 6-8, 1996. |
Wexelblat et al., “Virtual Reality Applications and Explorations”, Academic Press Inc., San Diego, USA, 262 pages, year 1993. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/161,508 Office Action dated Apr. 10, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/683,452 Office Action dated Jun. 7, 2013. |
Galor, M., U.S. Appl. No. 13/778,172 “Asymmetric Mapping in Tactile and Non-Tactile User Interfaces” filed Feb. 27, 2013. |
Berenson et al., U.S. Appl. No. 13/904,050 “Zoom-based gesture user interface” filed May 29, 2013. |
Berenson et al., U.S. Appl. No. 13/904,052 “Gesture-based interface with enhanced features” filed May 29, 2013. |
Bychkov et al., U.S. Appl. No. 13/849,514 “Gaze-enhanced Virtual Touchscreen” filed Mar. 24, 2013. |
Guendelman et al., U.S. Appl. No. 13/849,514 “Enhanced Virtual Touchpad” filed Mar. 24, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/244,490 Office Action dated Dec. 6, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/423,314 Office Action dated Dec. 4, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/423,322 Office Action dated Nov. 1, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/314,210 Office Action dated Jul. 19, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/161,508 Office Action dated Sep. 9, 2013. |
International Application PCT/IB2013/052332 Search Report dated Aug. 26, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/541,786 Office Action dated Feb. 13, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/584,831 Office Action dated Mar. 20, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/423,322 Office Action dated Apr. 7, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/683,452 Office Action dated Jan. 22, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/314,210 Office Action dated Jan. 10, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/592,352 Office Action dated Feb. 13, 2014. |
Nakamura et al, “Occlusion detectable stereo-occlusion patterns in camera matrix”, Proceedings of the 1996 Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR '96), pp. 371-378, Jun. 1996. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/592,352 Office Action dated May 7, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/721,582 Office Action dated Apr. 17, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/055,997 Office Action dated May 28, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/584,831 Office Action dated Jul. 8, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/423,314 Office Action dated Jul. 31, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/683,452 Office Action dated Jul. 16, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/423,314 Advisory Action dated Jun. 26, 2014. |
Slinger et al, “Computer—Generated Holography as a Generic Display Technology”, IEEE Computer, vol. 28, Issue 8, pp. 46-53, Aug. 2005. |
Hilliges et al, “Interactions in the air: adding further depth to interactive tabletops”, Proceedings of the 22nd annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, ACM, pp. 139-148, Oct. 2009. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120223882 A1 | Sep 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61420809 | Dec 2010 | US | |
61448670 | Mar 2011 | US | |
61538970 | Sep 2011 | US |