Three-dimensional woven forms with integral bias fibers and bias weaving loom

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6742547
  • Patent Number
    6,742,547
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, September 20, 2001
    22 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, June 1, 2004
    20 years ago
Abstract
Three-dimensional woven structures which include interwoven bias fibers and at least one integrally woven junction, and a loom for weaving these structures. The loom includes bias fiber holders, bias shuttles, and independently controllable bias arms to interweave the bias fibers. Each bias fiber holder holds a bias fiber under tension. The bias shuttles may releasably grip a number of the bias fiber holders and translate them horizontally between a plurality of predetermined horizontal positions. Each bias shuttle is at a separate vertical position. At least one bias shuttle translates above the shed and at least one bias shuttle translates below the shed. Each independently controllable bias arm may releasably grip one of the bias fiber holders and translate it vertically, at one of the predetermined horizontal positions, with a range of motion extending at least between two of the bias shuttles.
Description




TECHNICAL FIELD




The present invention relates generally to loom designs and, more particularly, to a fully automated loom design capable of weaving pre-form shapes such as “T,” “Pi,” and truss-core.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




Composite materials are those materials that result when two or more materials, each having its own (usually different) characteristics, are combined to yield useful properties for specific applications. In many applications, composite materials outperform more traditional solid materials such as wood, metal, and plastic. Therefore, great interest exists in the design of strong, lightweight structures formed using composite materials.




The advanced composite industry has commensurately shown increasing interest in cost-effective processes that yield high-quality composite parts. Among these processes is resin transfer molding (RTM). Traditionally, composite part fabrication has used very little textile technology. The manufacture of all textile product forms starts with raw fiber. Discrete fiber lengths (staple fiber) can be processed into random or semi-oriented mats (non-wovens). The raw fibers can be twisted together to form a spun yarn. Continuous filament yarns are also available. Three main drawbacks plague implementation of pre-form technology for advanced composite RTM markets: (1) meeting performance requirements for engineered structures, (2) satisfying shape requirements for complex parts, and (3) reducing manufacturing costs. Current developments of textile pre-form techniques suitable for RTM attempt to overcome these drawbacks.




Typically, simple, two-dimensional (2D) woven fabrics or unidirectional fibers are produced by a material supplier and sent to a customer who cuts out patterns and lays up the final part ply-by-ply. Recently, the industry has sought to use the potential processing capabilities and economics associated with textiles to produce near-net-shape fiber assemblies or pre-forms. If designed and implemented correctly, engineered textile pre-forms with controlled fiber architecture can potentially offer a structurally efficient and cost effective fabrication of composites having various shapes and meeting stringent performance requirements.




One method of forming desired composite structures is to create matrices of extremely strong fibers which are then locked in a hardening resin. Carbon fiber, glass fibers, aramid fiber, silicon carbide fiber, and various ceramics have all been used in such materials. The resin, often an epoxy, forms the shape of the structure and holds the fibers together upon hardening, while the fibers provide exceptional tensile strength along the axes of the fibers. Composite materials may also be designed to allow flexibility perpendicular to the axes of the fibers with greatly reduced issues of fatigue from repeated cycling.




Numerous methods can be used to create the desired fiber matrix forms for such structures. Such methods include weaving, knitting, braiding, twisting, and matting. Each of these methods has both advantages and limitations. Matting is the simplest of these methods, but has as limitations that the fibers are mostly only held together by the resin, which may lead to delamination, and that the number of fibers pointing in a particular direction, and hence the tensile strength in that direction, is not easily controlled. Braiding and twisting are limited to substantially linear structures. Knitting forms a substantially flat structure in which most fibers are not straight. Therefore, tensile stresses will work to straighten the fibers and a composite material having a matrix of knitted fibers as a pre-form will tend to stretch to some degree. Depending on the application, this characteristic may be desirable—but it is often undesirable. A woven material will hold together and resist stretching along fiber axes, even before the addition of the resin.




The simplest woven materials are flat, substantially 2D structures with fibers in only two directions. They are formed by interlacing two sets of yarns perpendicular to each other. In 2D weaving, the 0° yarns are called the warp and the 90° yarns are called the weft, weave, or fill. Fabrics with 0° yarns and 90° yarns are produced in at least four ways. First, the number of yarns per inch may be varied in either the warp or fill direction. Second, the weaver may use a yarn with a smaller or larger filament count, which changes the weight per unit area. Third, the weaver may adjust the number of harnesses used, ranging from two (for a plain weave) to more than twenty. Each harness contains a number of heddles, or healds, loops connected to the warp yarns which move warp yarns up and down, opening and closing the shed of the loom. Fourth, the fabric can contain a mixture of fabric types in either direction. For RTM, a series of woven fabrics can be combined to form a dry layup, which is placed in a mold and injected with resin. These fabrics can be pre-formed using either a “cut and sew” technique or thermally formed and “tacked” using a resin binder.




2D woven structures have limitations. The step of pre-forming requires extensive manual labor in the layup. 2D woven structures are not as strong or stretch-resistant along other than the 0° and 90° axes, particularly at angles farther from the fiber axes. One method to reduce this possible limitation is to add bias fibers to the weave, fibers woven to cut across the fabric at an intermediate angle, preferably at +45° and −45° to the axis of the fill fibers.




Simple woven forms are also single layered. This limits the possible strength of the material. One possible solution is to increase the fiber size. Another is to use multiple layers, or plies. An additional advantage of using multiple layers is that some layers may be oriented such that the warp and weave axes of different layers are in different directions, thereby acting like the previously discussed bias fibers. If these layers are a stack of single layers laminated together with the resin, however, then the problem of de-lamination arises. If the layers are sewn together, then many of the woven fibers may be damaged during the sewing process and the overall tensile strength may suffer. In addition, for both lamination and sewing of multiple plies, a hand layup operation usually is necessary to align the layers. Alternatively, the layers may be interwoven as part of the weaving process. Creating multiple interwoven layers of fabric, particularly with integral bias fibers, has been a difficult problem. Some exemplary methods to accomplish the production of a fabric having multiple interwoven layers with bias fibers are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,540,260 issued to Mood and titled “Multi-Axial Yard Structure and Weaving Method.”




Fabrics woven by these previously described methods are still substantially 2D structures. Such fabrics are very useful for structures, such as an “L” shaped form, which do not have any junctions at which three or more sections meet. If structures having cross-sectional shapes such as “T,” “Pi,” and truss-core are formed from a substantially 2D fabric, however, then junctions must be formed either by lamination or sewing with the same flaws previously described.




Three-dimensional (3D) weaving is capable of creating filly integrated shapes with high laminar strength. Shapes such as “T, ” “Pi, ” and truss-core are possible without lamination or sewing. On the other hand, relative to 2D weaving, 3D weaving is more expensive and slower.




Jacquard control is one method of forming 3D woven forms. A Jacquard-control system allows individual heddles to be raised and lowered in any combination, rather than only a preset number of combinations determined by the harnesses in the loom.

FIG. 10

shows a series of individual heddles


1000


, holding warp yarns


102


. Each of these exemplary heddles


1000


employs a hook


1002


with a clasp


1003


to hold the yarns


102


. Specific heddle


1004


is shown in a raised position forming a shed.




The usefulness of this capability to individually control the heddles is demonstrated in

FIGS. 9A-9E

. Traditionally, heddle selection is programmed on a punched Jacquard-card which is fed through a reading mechanism on a loop, but this may also be accomplished via other digital or analog programming techniques.

FIG. 9A

illustrates a simple 3D form, a “T.” A single fill fiber


900


may be woven through warp fibers


902


,


904


,


906


,


908


,


910


,


912


, and


914


in four steps, as shown in

FIGS. 9B-9E

. This is only one of the possible operations to accomplish this particular weave pattern and only one of the possible weave patterns which may be used to create a “T” form.





FIG. 9B

shows the fill fiber


900


being passed from left to right through a shed formed by raising warp fibers


904


and


908


, while lowering the remaining warp fibers


902


,


906


,


910


,


912


, and


914


. Next, as shown in

FIG. 9C

, warp fiber


908


is lowered and warp fibers


902


,


906


, and


910


are raised, then the fill fiber


900


is passed back to the left. In

FIG. 9D

, warp fibers


912


and


908


are raised and fill fiber


900


again passes through the shed to the right. Finally,

FIG. 9E

shows warp fiber


914


being raised and warp fibers


904


and


912


being lowered as fill fiber


900


returns to the left.




This weave could be accomplished using an eight-harness system as well as a Jacquard-control system. As 3D forms become more complex, however, this alternative becomes impractical. In addition, reprogramming a Jacquard system is much simpler and less time consuming than changing, and possibly reprogramming the motion of, a set of harnesses.




To overcome the shortcomings of existing weaving technology as applied to form three dimensional structures with integrally interwoven junctions and integrally interwoven bias fibers, a new weaving loom is provided. An object of the present invention is to provide improved three dimensional woven forms for RTM composite material processing. A related object is to simplify the RTM processing procedure. Another object is to simplify the addition of integrally interwoven bias fibers in woven structures.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




To achieve these and other objects, and in view of its purposes, the present invention provides an improved weaving loom. The loom permits the formation of cross-sectional shapes with integrally interwoven junctions as a single piece. Jacquard-controlled heddles are used to orchestrate a complicated series of motions of the warp fibers. Previously, no loom existed which combined the 3D cross-section capabilities of a Jacquard-control system with interwoven bias fibers.




One embodiment of the present invention is a loom for weaving 3D structures which include a plurality of warp fibers, a fill fiber, and a plurality of interwoven bias fibers. An exemplary loom includes a plurality of heddles, a plurality of bias fiber holders, a plurality of bias shuttles, a plurality of independently controllable bias arms, a weave shuttle, and a reed. The heddles are adapted to translate the warp fibers vertically. Each heddle is designed to independently move one of the warp fibers between an upper warp position and a lower warp position. The motion of the heddles causes the warp fibers to form a shed.




The bias fibers are held by the bias fiber holders. Each bias fiber holder is adapted to hold a bias fiber under tension. The bias fiber holders may be releasably gripped in either (a) one of a plurality of bias shuttles, or (b) one of a plurality of independently controllable bias arms.




The bias shuttles are adapted to releasably grip a number of bias fiber holders. Each bias shuttle has a separate vertical position and can translate horizontally carrying gripped bias fiber holders between a plurality of predetermined horizontal positions. At least one bias shuttle is configured in a vertical position above the shed and at least one bias shuttle is configured in a vertical position below the shed.




Each bias arm is adapted to releasably grip one bias fiber holder at a time and is located at one of the predetermined horizontal positions. Each bias arm has a range of motion which extends, at least, between two of the bias shuttles. Each bias arm may translate a gripped bias fiber holder within its range of motion.




The weave shuttle is adapted to pass the fill fiber through the shed formed by the warp fibers and the bias fibers, substantially along a centerline of the shed. The weave shuttle may also be a needle. The reed is used for beat up.




In another aspect of the present invention, a 3D woven structure is provided with bias fibers. An exemplary 3D woven structure with bias fibers includes a first woven planar fabric piece, a second woven planar fabric piece, and an integrally woven junction. The first woven planar fabric piece has a central portion and two selvedges and is woven from a plurality of first warp fibers, a fill fiber, and a plurality of bias fibers. The second woven planar fabric piece is formed from a plurality of second warp fibers (which are distinct from the first warp fibers), the fill fiber, and a subset of the bias fibers. The integrally woven junction couples the central portion of the first woven planar fabric piece to the second woven planar fabric piece.




It is to be understood that both the foregoing general description and the following detailed description are exemplary, but are not restrictive, of the invention.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING




The invention is best understood from the following detailed description when read in connection with the accompanying drawing. It is emphasized that, according to common practice, the various features of the drawing are not to scale. On the contrary, the dimensions of the various features are arbitrarily expanded or reduced for clarity. Included in the drawing are the following figures:





FIG. 1

is a perspective drawing illustrating a piece of fabric which includes a 45° bias fiber;





FIG. 2

is a perspective drawing of an exemplary loom for weaving 3D forms including bias fibers;





FIG. 3

is a perspective drawing of an exemplary bias fiber arm and bias fiber holder;





FIGS. 4A-4H

are a sequence of perspective drawings of the exemplary loom in

FIG. 2

illustrating an exemplary operation of the bias fiber arms, bias fiber holders, and a bias fiber shuttle;





FIGS. 5A-5C

are a sequence of perspective drawings of the exemplary loom in

FIG. 2

illustrating another exemplary operation of the bias fiber arms, bias fiber holders, and a bias fiber shuttle;





FIGS. 6A-6C

are a sequence of perspective drawings of the exemplary loom in

FIG. 2

illustrating an exemplary operation of the bias fiber arms and bias fiber holders;





FIGS. 7A-7F

are side plan views of exemplary cross-sectional shapes for 3D woven forms produced using the exemplary loom of

FIG. 2

;





FIG. 8

is a side plan view of an exemplary, multi-layer, 3D, woven form illustrating exemplary tapered selvedges;





FIG. 9A

illustrates a simple 3D form, a “T,” which may be woven using a conventional Jacquard-control system;





FIGS. 9B-9E

show the sequential steps used to weave the form shown in

FIG. 9A

; and





FIG. 10

shows a conventional Jacquard-control system illustrating a series of individual heddles holding warp yarns.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION




An exemplary embodiment of the present invention is a loom that automatically inter-weaves bias-plied, 3D, woven pre-forms into complex configurations such as “Pi” and “T” shapes. This is in contrast to methods such as stitching mechanisms designed to sew together 2D layers of bias plies or manual hand-layup of bias plies to form 3D structures. This exemplary embodiment offers several advantages over the known art, including:




1. The elimination of a stitching mechanism reduces fiber damage within the woven pre-form, achieves higher damage tolerance, and tolerates higher tension and shear loads for composite materials. Further, the elimination of a stitching mechanism reduces fabricating costs by avoiding the stitching process.




2. The elimination of a hand-layup process reduces possible delamination failure of the composite structure, achieves higher damage tolerance, permits weight reduction of the composite structures, tolerates higher tension and shear loads for composite materials, and reduces fabricating costs.




Referring now to the drawing, in which like reference numbers refer to like elements throughout,

FIGS. 1 and 2

facilitate a description of the bias plies weaving loom of the present invention.

FIG. 1

shows a flat fabric piece


100


with warp fibers


102


, fill fibers


104


, and +45° bias fibers


106


. In order to interweave the +45° bias fibers


106


with the warp fibers


102


and the fill fibers


104


, each of the ends of the +45° bias fibers


106


must be maneuvered as indicated by direction arrow


108


. The +45° bias fiber


106


is offset one warp spacing in the fill direction by passing alternatively above and below adjacent warp fibers


102


. For true weaving, this bias filling motion must occur between weaving steps. Moreover, in order to weave complex shapes with both +45° and −45° bias fibers, the bias filling motion must occur in both directions from above and below the weave and be fully programmable (using the capabilities and advantages of computer technology and automation).




As shown in

FIG. 2

, an exemplary bias weaving loom


200


of the present invention has many of the same elements as a conventional loom: a set of heddles (only the heddle frame


202


is shown in the figures to reduce clutter and improve clarity); a weave shuttle


204


; and a reed


206


. The exemplary loom


200


also includes a number of bias shuttles


208


and


209


, an array of bias arms


210


, and a number of bias fiber holders


212


. The bias shuttles preferably include two horizontal bias shuttles


208


and two vertical bias shuttles


209


as shown in FIG.


2


.




The heddles are designed to controllably open and close the warp fibers


102


, creating a shed


404


(see FIG.


4


B and the discussion below) for the shuttles (weave shuttle


204


and bias shuttles


208


,


209


) to pass through. The heddles are independently controllable, preferably using a Jacquard-control mechanism, allowing complex 3D forms to be created in the loom


200


. This mechanism also allows for the creation of interwoven multi-layer fabrics.




The captured weave shuttle


204


inserts the fill fiber


104


through the shed


404


, and the reed


206


performs beat-up operations to maintain the desired fill spacing. The +45° bias fibers


106


are introduced into the weave via the bias fiber holders


212


, which are adapted to be maneuvered through the weave horizontally by the bias shuttles


208


,


209


and vertically by the array of bias arms


210


. The designations of horizontal and vertical, and the later designations of upper and lower, are used only for convenience and do not correspond to limitations on the orientation of the present embodiment. The bias arms


210


are hinged to allow the fibers to move above and below the weave axis “A” and, preferably, outside of the shed


404


.





FIG. 2

shows the preferred embodiment in which the bias arms


210


are separated into two sets, one set operating to translate the +45° bias fibers


106


from above the upper side of the shed


404


to the weave axis and the other set operating to translate the +45° bias fibers


106


from the weave axis to below the lower side of the shed


404


. The array of bias arms


210


is shown located above and below the weave in FIG.


2


. Each arm


210


pivots about a line close to the fill line. Thus, the arms


210


are capable of moving the tubes


304


(see FIG.


3


and the discussion below) in and out of the warp fibers


102


while holding nearly constant the distance from the fiber end to the weave axis. Much like a Jacquard head, an arbitrary sequence of arm moves can be programmed: the arms


210


can be moved in concert or singly in order to selectively weave +45° bias fibers


106


.




Some weave sequences require that the +45° bias fibers


106


be passed completely through the thickness of the weave. This operation is readily completed by passing a tube from an arm above the weave to an arm below the weave. This operation is shown in more detail in

FIGS. 6A-6C

.





FIG. 3

is a more detailed illustration of the bias fiber holder


212


and a bias fiber arm


210


, which are used to handle and tension the +45° bias fibers


106


. Because the +45° bias fibers


106


are relatively short, they may be cut to length before introduction into the weave. The +45° bias fibers


106


are maneuvered in and around the weave by carrying them in tubes


304


. Each tube


304


is preferably slightly longer than the longest +45° bias fiber


106


. The tube


304


has a vacuum port


308


at one end and a ceramic lining


306


at the other end. A length of +45° bias fiber


106


is loaded into the tube


304


at the ceramic-lined end and drawn into the tube


304


by applying a vacuum to the vacuum port


308


. The flow of air between the +45° bias fiber


106


and the ceramic lining


306


at the front of the tube


304


creates a nearly constant tension on the +45° bias fiber


106


. The vacuum is preferably supplied by connection of the vacuum port


308


to the bias shuttles


208


,


209


.




Small lengths of tubing are brazed onto the tube


304


in order to provide gripper interfaces. There are preferably two arm gripper interfaces


310


and two shuttle gripper interfaces


312


, as shown in FIG.


3


. This configuration allows a bias fiber holder


212


to be simultaneously gripped by a bias arm


210


and a bias shuttle


208


or


209


, or by two bias arms


210


, to accommodate transfers. A typical gripper (comprising two arm gripper interfaces


310


and two shuttle gripper interfaces


312


) on a bias arm


210


is shown in FIG.


3


. Opposing pins


300


engage one of the arm gripper interfaces


310


and pull the tube


304


against the spring-loaded V-grooves


302


to precisely locate the tube


304


.




As shown in

FIG. 1

, the weaving of the +45° bias fibers


106


requires not only that they be brought above and below the weave, but also that they be offset across the warp fibers


102


. The bias shuttles


208


,


209


can grip an array of bias fiber holders


212


and carry out this motion while tensioning the fiber by drawing a vacuum through the tube ends. Each bias shuttle


208


,


209


includes an array of grippers to grip bias fiber holders


212


. Each bias shuttle


208


,


209


is also adapted, preferably using computer control, to move horizontally in the fill (90°) direction by increments of the warp fiber spacing. The vertical bias shuttles


209


also may serve as buffers during many weave sequences. This service allows the bias arms


210


to pass those bias fiber holders


212


not involved in a particular weave sequence to the vertical bias shuttles


209


and receive new bias fiber holders


212


from opposing bias arms


210


or vertical bias shuttles


209


.





FIGS. 4A through 4H

illustrate an exemplary weaving loom sequence using the loom


200


of the present embodiment. At the beginning of this sequence, illustrated in

FIG. 4A

, a fiber has been cut to length and inserted into the individual bias fiber holder


400


with a small length of fiber extending beyond the ceramic-lined end of the newly filled individual bias fiber holder


400


. The newly filled individual bias fiber holder


400


is mounted on the right horizontal bias shuttle


401


. The bias fiber holders


212


gripped by the array of bias arm


210


above and below the warp carry fibers whose ends are already engaged into the weave. The warp is beginning to open the shed


404


in preparation for the insertion of a weave (90°) fiber by weave shuttle


204


.





FIG. 4B

illustrates the next step in this sequence. The warp is completely opened forming the shed


404


as the weave shuttle


204


passes through. The weave shuttle


204


pulls behind it a fill fiber


104


. As illustrated in

FIG. 4C

, once the weave shuttle


204


has passed completely through the warp, the reed


206


comes forward for beat up.

FIG. 4D

shows the right horizontal bias shuttle


401


carrying a newly filled individual bias fiber holder


400


. The right horizontal bias shuttle


401


moves through the shed


404


of the open warp as the


20


top array of bias arms


210


lowers the bias fiber holders


212


between warp fibers.





FIG. 4E

illustrates the next step in this exemplary sequence. Right horizontal bias shuttle


401


has passed newly filled individual bias fiber holder


400


completely through the shed


404


so that one tube-spacing exists beyond the farthest warp fiber. The loom


200


grips a small length of +45° bias fiber


106


extending beyond the ceramic lined end of the individual bias fiber holder


400


so that it will be pulled out of the individual bias fiber holder


400


and into the weave during subsequent movement of the individual bias fiber holder


400


. The top bias arms


210


deposit each of the bias fiber holders


212


, including the nearly empty individual bias fiber holder


402


, onto the right horizontal bias shuttle


401


.




In

FIG. 4F

, the top array of bias arms


210


release bias fiber holders


212


and nearly empty individual bias fiber holder


402


and rise above the warp. The right horizontal bias shuttle


401


indexes to the right by one warp fiber spacing. This motion pulls the +45° bias fibers


106


under the warp fibers


102


in the process of weaving the +45° bias fibers


106


. Motion of other bias fiber holders


212


in the opposite direction, as orchestrated by the bias arms


210


and bias shuttles


208


,


209


, may allow for simultaneous weaving of the −45° bias fibers.





FIG. 4G

illustrates the next step: the top bias arms


210


again come down between the warp fibers


102


and grip all but the nearly empty individual bias fiber holder


402


, which is the right-most fiber holder. Finally, in the last step of the first sequence, as shown in

FIG. 4H

, the top bias arms


210


again rise, carrying with them each of the bias fiber holders


212


carrying fibers engaged in the weave. Nearly empty individual bias fiber holder


402


is withdrawn with right horizontal bias shuttle


401


to be reloaded by the loading module (not shown).




It is contemplated that this operation may be performed using more than one newly filled individual bias fiber holder


400


at a time and that the horizontal bias shuttle


208


may be indexed any whole number of warp fiber spacings to allow for bias fibers at angles other than ±45°.





FIGS. 5A through 5C

illustrate a second exemplary weaving loom sequence. In this exemplary sequence, as shown in

FIG. 5A

, three of the bias arms


500


, carrying three bias fiber holders


502


, move upward from their starting position as upper bias shuttle


501


moves to the left. The three bias fiber holders


502


are gripped by the upper bias shuttle


501


and released by the bias arms


500


.





FIG. 5B

shows how the upper bias shuttle


501


, which now holds the three bias fiber holders


502


, may be indexed to the right by a single warp fiber spacing. This indexing function may, instead, move the upper bias shuttle


501


a single warp fiber spacing to the left or another number of warp fiber spacings in either direction as necessary to clear the bias fiber holders


502


from the bias arms


500


. Finally, as shown in

FIG. 5C

, the empty bias arms


500


move down, ready to receive bias fiber holders


502


from bias shuttles or the opposing bias arms, and bias fiber holders


502


remain buffered in upper bias shuttle


501


.




The number of bias fiber holders


502


being buffered in upper bias shuttle


501


in

FIGS. 5A-5C

was chosen to be three for exemplary purposes only. This number may range from one to the total number of bias fiber holders


502


being employed in the loom


200


, depending on the actual 3D fabric form being woven.





FIGS. 6A through 6C

illustrate a third exemplary weaving loom sequence. At the beginning of this sequence, as shown in

FIG. 6A

, the array of bottom bias arms


604


has deposited its bias fiber holders


602


on the lower bias shuttle (hidden from view). The bias fiber holders


602


are being gripped by the array of top bias arms


600


. Both the top and bottom bias arms begin to come through the open warp.




The top bias arms


600


and the bottom bias arms


604


meet in the horizontal plane along the warp axis in the step shown in FIG.


6


B. The bias fiber holders


602


are then gripped by the bottom bias arms


604


and released by the top bias arms


600


. Finally, as shown in

FIG. 6C

, the top and bottom bias arms return to their original positions, the bottom bias arms


604


now carrying the bias fiber holders to below the shed


404


formed by the warp fibers


102


.




This operation may also be used to transfer the bias fiber holders


602


from the bottom bias arms


604


to the top bias arms


600


. In addition, although all bias arms were involved in the exemplary transfer shown in

FIGS. 6A-6C

, any number of bias fiber holders may be transferred, depending on the actual 3D fabric form being woven.




The three exemplary bias fiber weaving sequences illustrated in

FIGS. 4A-4H

,

FIGS. 5A-5C

, and

FIGS. 6A-6C

utilize the independently controllable bias arms and computer controlled bias shuttles to allow precise, and complex, placement of bias fibers within a woven form. This control of the weave path of the bias fibers is preferably combined with Jacquard-control of the independent heddles to precisely define the weave path of the weave thread among the warp threads and bias threads. In this way, any 3D woven form, which may be formed with warp and fill fibers, no matter the complexity, may be formed to include bias fibers integrally woven throughout the form.





FIGS. 7A-7F

and


8


illustrate a number of cross-sectional shapes of 3D woven forms, which may be formed using the exemplary loom


200


described above, as viewed in the direction parallel to the warp fibers


102


. These forms include at least one woven layer containing warp fibers


102


and fill fibers


104


. Multiple layers, which are preferably interwoven, may also be formed in a specific portion of a form or the entire form. The 3D woven forms may additionally contain bias fibers oriented along one or more angles, preferably +45° and −45°. Each form has a first fabric piece


700


with two selvedges


704


constituting the opposing woven edges of the first fabric piece


700


. The selvedges


704


are connected to at least one additional (in the example illustrated in

FIG. 7A

, a second) fabric piece


702


by a woven junction


706


. Although the figures illustrate the exemplary structures as formed with substantially straight fabric portions, this is not necessary; structures including curved portions may be formed as well.





FIG. 7A

shows a “T” cross-section.

FIGS. 7B and 7C

show “Pi” and “I” cross-sections, respectively. These cross-sections include two additional fabric pieces


702


and two woven junctions


706


. They may be woven in the same manner.

FIG. 7D

shows an “X” cross-section. This form preferably includes two additional fabric pieces


702


connected to the first fabric piece


700


at a single woven junction


706


.





FIG. 7E

shows a truss-core cross-section. This cross-section includes a plurality of additional fabric pieces


702


, which are coupled to the first fabric piece


700


at woven junctions


706


of either a single additional fabric piece


702


or two additional fabric pieces


702


. It is noted that a woven junction


706


of this structure may coincide substantially with a selvedge


704


of the first fabric piece


700


. This structure, as well as the structure in

FIG. 7F

, also includes woven junctions


708


in which two or more additional fabric pieces


702


are coupled. Although the structure shown in

FIG. 7E

has a single truss-core layer, it is contemplated that truss-core structures of more than one such layer may be formed.





FIG. 7F

shows a honeycomb cross-sectional pattern. This structure includes further additional fabric pieces


710


which are not coupled directly to the first fabric piece


700


, but only to additional fabric pieces


702


at woven junctions


708


. As with the previously described truss-core structure, multiple honeycomb layers may be formed and the structure shown in

FIG. 7F

is only exemplary.





FIG. 8

shows a cross-sectional view of an exemplary, multi-layer “T” structure which may be formed by the exemplary loom


200


of FIG.


2


. This structure illustrates three exemplary methods of tapering selvedges of a multi-layer formed woven using the exemplary loom


200


. Both the first fabric piece


700


and the additional fabric piece


702


in the illustrated structure are shown having six interwoven layers. The first selvedge


800


is shown without any taper. The second selvedge


802


illustrates a taper from one side and the third selvedge


804


shows a taper on both sides.




It is also contemplated that the cross-sectional shape of a form may be changed during the weaving process, so that a form may include a “T” shaped portion and a “Pi” shaped portion, for example. In addition, the tapering or number of layers in a form may be changed during weaving.




Although illustrated and described above with reference to certain specific embodiments, the present invention is nevertheless not intended to be limited to the details shown. Rather, various modifications may be made in the details within the scope and range of equivalents of the claims and without departing from the spirit of the invention.



Claims
  • 1. A three-dimensional woven structure with bias fibers comprising:a first woven planar fabric piece, including a central portion and two selvedges, woven from: (a) a plurality of first warp fibers, (b) a fill fiber, and (c) a plurality of bias fibers; second woven planar fabric piece woven from: (a) a plurality of second warp fibers, (b) the fill fiber, and (c) a subset of the plurality of bias fibers; and an integrally woven junction coupling the central portion of the first woven planar fabric piece to the second woven planar fabric piece.
  • 2. The three-dimensional woven structure according to claim 1, wherein the first woven planar fabric piece includes at least two interwoven layers.
  • 3. The three-dimensional woven structure according to claim 2, wherein at least one of the selvedges of the first woven planar fabric piece is tapered.
  • 4. The three-dimensional woven structure according to claim 1, wherein the second woven planar fabric piece includes at least two interwoven layers.
  • 5. The three-dimensional woven structure according to claim 4, wherein the second woven planar fabric piece includes a second selvedge which is tapered.
  • 6. The three-dimensional woven structure according to claim 1, wherein the plurality of first warp fibers, the plurality of second warp fibers, the fill fiber, and the plurality of bias fibers are at least one of carbon fiber, glass fiber, aramid fiber, silicon carbide fiber, and ceramic fiber.
  • 7. The three-dimensional woven structure according to claim 1, wherein a cross-section of the three-dimensional woven structure is at least one of a T shape, an I shape, an X shape, a pi shape, a truss-core shape, and a honeycomb shape.
  • 8. A three-dimensional woven structure with bias fibers comprising:a first woven planar fabric piece, including at least two interwoven layers, including a central portion and two selvedges, woven from: (a) a plurality of first warp fibers, (b) a fill fiber, and (c) a plurality of bias fibers; and a second woven planar fabric piece, including at least two interwoven layers, woven from: (a) a plurality of second warp fibers, (b) the fill fiber, and (c) a subset of the plurality of bias fibers; and an integrally woven junction coupling the central portion of the first woven planar fabric piece to the second woven planar fabric piece.
  • 9. The three-dimensional woven structure according to claim 8, wherein at least one of the selvedges of the first woven planar fabric piece is tapered.
  • 10. The three-dimensional woven structure according to claim 8, wherein the second woven planar fabric piece includes a second selvedge which is tapered.
  • 11. The three-dimensional woven structure according to claim 8, wherein the plurality of first warp fibers, the plurality of second warp fibers, the fill fiber, and the plurality of bias fibers are at least one of carbon fiber, glass fiber, aramid fiber, silicon carbide fiber, and ceramic fiber.
  • 12. The three-dimensional woven structure according to claim 8, wherein a cross-section of the three-dimensional woven structure is at least one of a T shape, an I shape, an X shape, a pi shape, a truss-core shape, and a honeycomb shape.
  • 13. A three-dimensional woven structure with bias fibers comprising:a first woven planar fabric piece, including at least two interwoven layers, including a central portion and two selvedges, woven from: (a) a plurality of first warp fibers, (b) a fill fiber, and (c) a plurality of bias fibers; a second woven planar fabric piece, including at least two interwoven layers, woven from: (a) a plurality of second warp fibers, (b) the fill fiber, and (c) a subset of the plurality of bias fibers; and an integrally woven junction coupling the central portion of the first woven planar fabric piece to the second woven planar fabric piece; wherein the plurality of first warp fibers, the plurality of second warp fibers, the fill fiber, and the plurality of bias fibers are at least one of carbon fiber, glass fiber, aramid fiber, silicon carbide fiber, and ceramic fiber; and a cross-section of the three-dimensional woven structure is at least one of a T shape, an I shape, an X shape, a pi shape, a truss-core shape, and a honeycomb shape.
  • 14. A three-dimensional woven structure according to claim 13, wherein at least one of the selvedges of the first woven planar fabric piece is tapered.
  • 15. The three-dimensional woven structure according to claim 13, wherein the second woven planar fabric piece includes a second selvedge which is tapered.
RELATED APPLICATION

This application claims the benefit of priority of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/234,036, filed on Sep. 20, 2000.

US Referenced Citations (18)
Number Name Date Kind
4671470 Jonas Jun 1987 A
4782864 Abildskov Nov 1988 A
RE33418 Krueger Nov 1990 E
5085252 Mohamed et al. Feb 1992 A
5137058 Anahara et al. Aug 1992 A
5375627 Iida et al. Dec 1994 A
5394906 Farley Mar 1995 A
5399418 Hartmanns et al. Mar 1995 A
5431193 Mood et al. Jul 1995 A
5435352 Yamamoto et al. Jul 1995 A
5451448 Sawko et al. Sep 1995 A
5465760 Mohamed et al. Nov 1995 A
5657795 Sawko et al. Aug 1997 A
5775381 Addis Jul 1998 A
5783279 Edgson et al. Jul 1998 A
5981022 Min et al. Nov 1999 A
6019138 Malek et al. Feb 2000 A
6129122 Bilisik Oct 2000 A
Foreign Referenced Citations (1)
Number Date Country
8134747 May 1996 JP
Non-Patent Literature Citations (3)
Entry
S. Wilson et al., ““SPARC” 5 Axis, 3D Woven, Low Crimp Preforms,” 43rd International SAMPE Symposium and Exhibition May 31-Jun. 4, 1998, published in Resin Transfer Molding, Society for the Advancement of Material and Process Engineering Monograph No. 3, at pp. 101-113 (May 1999).
S. Clarke, “Engineered Textile Preforms for RTM: A Comparison of Braiding, Knitting, and Weaving Technologies,” 29th International SAMPE Technical Conference Oct. 28-Nov. 1, 1997, published in Resin Transfer Molding, Society for the Advancement of Material and Process Engineering Monograph No. 3, at pp. 15-23 (May 1999).
H. Kipp, Narrow Fabric Weaving, pp. 221-227 (1989).
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60/234036 Sep 2000 US