Information
-
Patent Grant
-
6573629
-
Patent Number
6,573,629
-
Date Filed
Monday, July 31, 200024 years ago
-
Date Issued
Tuesday, June 3, 200321 years ago
-
Inventors
-
Original Assignees
-
Examiners
Agents
-
CPC
-
US Classifications
Field of Search
US
- 310 166
- 310 168
- 310 184
- 310 185
- 310 198
- 310 208
-
International Classifications
-
Abstract
A three-phase magneto generator that provides a greater and more uniform output for a given driving force and at a lower temperature to provide a more compact generator. This is accomplished by having no more than two armature teeth are in registry with a single magnetic segment during the relative rotation.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to a three-phase magneto generator and more particularly to such a device that provides a greater and more uniform output for a given driving force and at a lower temperature to provide a more compact generator.
Conventional magneto generators have a rotor carrying permanent magnets that is driven by a prime mover such as an internal combustion engine to induce voltages in stator coils as the rotating magnetic fields pass the stator coils. The number of magnetic poles of the permanent magnets disposed in the rotating (circumferential) direction of the rotor is 2n where “n” is a positive integer. This is because the same number of N-poles and S-poles must be located at equal intervals in the circumferential direction. In the case of a three-phase generator, the number of teeth or armature cores P of the stator core is 3m with “m” being a positive integer.
Conventionally, n=m. That is, when the number of magnetic poles M of the rotor is arranged as 2n, the number of teeth P of the stator core is set to 3m=3n. For example, when n=6, the number of magnetic poles M is set to 12, the number of teeth or armature cores P is 18. When n=8, those numbers are defined as M=16, and P=24.
This conventional relationship is shown in
FIGS. 1 and 2
that show respectively, a partial cross sectioned front view a diametrical cross section a magneto generator, with n=m =6, or M=12 and P=18. A rotor, shown generally at
21
, comprises a boss portion
22
is driven for example by being secured to a crankshaft (not shown) of an internal combustion engine or other suitable prime mover. The rotor
21
further comprises a generally cup-shaped cup portion
23
secured to a flange of the boss portion
22
. A plurality of annular permanent magnets
24
are suitably secured to the inside circumferential surface of the cup portion
23
. The permanent magnets
24
are magnetized to have 2n poles of opposite polarities in the circumferential direction. This conventional example is arranged as n=6, and so number of magnetic poles M is 2n=12.
A stator
25
cooperates with the rotor
21
. The stator
25
is comprised of a stator core formed by laminating thin steel plates having teeth or armatures
26
on which coils
27
are wound. The number of teeth
26
of the stator
25
is 18. In this case, m=6 because 3×m=18. The coils
27
have U-, V-, and W-phases. The coil of each phase is wound on every three teeth
26
in succession. In this case, the every three teeth or armature on which the coils
27
of the same phase are wound oppose the same polarity of the magnet
24
at the same electrical angle. In order to arrange that the teeth of the same phase oppose the same polarity of the magnet
24
at the same electrical angle as described, it is necessary that either n=m or at least n is an integer multiple of m.
With the conventional generator as described above, since electricity is generated in the state of that the m (six) teeth
26
wound on the coils
27
having same place are opposed to the m (six) permanent magnets in the same phase, harmonics induced at the respective m (six) teeth are superimposed in the same phase, and distortion in the output waveform is intensified. This distortion is graphically illustrated in FIG.
3
. The three phase wiring diagram for the machine and voltage outputs V
1
and V
2
are shown in FIG.
4
.
Because of this distortion the torque required for driving the rotor
21
increases for a given output to be produced. This problem has been exacerbated in recent years because the performance of permanent magnets has been significantly improved. For example, the neodymium-iron-boron magnet having a high maximum magnetic energy product has come to be known. When such a high performance magnet is used, variation in the driving torque for the rotor also increases.
With the increase in the driving torque, when the rotor is driven with an internal combustion engine, cyclic variation in the load on the engine also increases. This in particular necessitates increase the of the driving power or output of the engine. This is shown in the broken line curves of FIG.
5
. In the case the generator is driven with the engine, this means that the size of the engine increases. Moreover, since the coils of respective phases are connected in series at the same electrical angle, generated voltage is increased, but the output voltage waveform is not smooth and includes many harmonics, resulting in a low generation efficiency as also shown in this figure.
This further results in problems of self-heat generation of the generator as seen in the broken line curve of FIG.
6
. Thus the amount of generated electricity cannot be increased without increasing the size of the generator.
Moreover, the output voltage waveforms in respective phases are heavily disturbed and include many sharp spike-shaped waveforms with high peak voltages as seen in FIG.
3
. This has necessitated a capacitor for smoothing the output voltage which, in turn, has resulted in the use of a large size and high cost capacitor. Such problems become particularly acute when the neodymium-iron-boron magnet is used.
It is therefore an object of this invention to provide a three-phase magnetic generator that makes it possible to reduce the size and power of the driving prime mover by reducing the driving torque while at the same time improving the generation efficiency by smoothing the output voltage waveform.
It is a further object of the invention to reduce the size of coils or to produce a high output by making the coils compact by reducing the amount of self-generated electricity and also to reduce the size and cost of the smoothing capacitor by reducing the peak voltage or totally eliminating the need for such capacitors.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
This invention is adapted to be embodied in a generator that is comprised of relatively rotatably first and second components. The first component has affixed to it in circumferentially spaced array, a plurality of segmented cylindrical, permanent magnets. The second member has a plurality of armature teeth around which coils are wound so that an electrical current will be induced in the coil windings upon relative rotation between the two members. The configuration is such that no more than two armature teeth are in registry with a single magnetic segment during the relative rotation.
In accordance with another feature of the invention, the configuration is such that the voltages induced at the armature teeth is the same phase voltage and of the same phase around the circumference of the machine.
In accordance with a still further feature of the invention, this is achieved by having the number of magnetic poles being equal to 2n and the number of armature teeth is equal to 3m where n and m are positive integers and that 2n divided by m is not an integer.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1
is a front view of a conventional generator arrangement.
FIG. 2
is a diametric cross sectional view of the conventional generator shown in FIG.
1
.
FIG. 3
shows phase voltage waveform of the conventional generator. and one constructed in accordance with a first embodiment of the invention.
FIG. 4
is a schematic circuit diagram showing the voltage value measurement points used in FIG.
3
.
FIG. 5
is a graphical view comparing efficiency, driving power and electrical output verses speed in a prior art machine, in broken lines, and for a machine practicing the invention, shows output waveform distortion.
FIG. 6
is a graphical view showing thermal characteristics in a prior art machine, in broken lines, and for a machine practicing the invention, in solid lines. phase voltage waveform.
FIG. 7
is a diametric cross sectional view, in part similar to
FIG. 1
, and shows a generator constructed in accordance with a first embodiment in driving relation to an internal combustion engine shown in part.
FIG. 8
is a front view of the embodiment shown in FIG.
7
.
FIG. 9
is a graphical view in part similar to
FIG. 3
but shows the phase voltage waveform of the embodiment of
FIGS. 7 and 8
.
FIG. 10
is a front view, in part similar to FIG.
8
and shows a second embodiment of the invention.
FIG. 11
is a graphical view showing the phase voltage waveform of a conventional arrangement.
FIG. 12
is a graphical view showing the phase voltage waveform of a generator constructed in accordance with the invention.
FIG. 13
is a graphical view showing the inter-phase voltage waveform of a conventional arrangement.
FIG. 14
is a graphical view showing the inter-phase voltage waveform of a generator constructed in accordance with the invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
Referring first to the embodiment of
FIGS. 7 and 8
, the output shaft of a prime mover such as an internal combustion engine
31
, namely a crankshaft
32
is supported with a right-left split crankcase
33
. A bearing
34
, together with another bearing (not shown), supports the crankshaft
32
for rotation within the crankcase
33
. The crankshaft
32
is formed by joining paired right and left crank webs
35
and
36
together by a crank pin
37
. The big end of a connecting rod
38
is supported through a needle bearing
39
on the crank pin
37
. The small end of the connecting rod
38
is pivotally connected to a piston (not shown) for reciprocation within a cylinder
41
of the engine
31
.
Part of the crankshaft
32
projects through a wall of the crankcase
33
to drive a three-phase magnetic generator
42
is mounted thereon and constructed in accordance with this first embodiment. The generator
42
comprises a stator
25
(using the same reference numerals as applied to the prior art construction previously described). This is done because the components are the same except for their size and number. The stator
25
is secured by bolts
43
to a stator holder
44
fixed to a front wall of the crankcase
33
. That is, four bolts
43
are inserted into four bolt holes
45
(
FIG. 8
) bored in a stator core.
The boss portion
22
of the rotor
21
is fit over a tapered surface of the crankshaft
32
and held against rotation by a key
46
. A nut
47
is threaded onto a threaded end
48
of the crankshaft
32
. A fan
49
is secured to the rotor
21
and covered with a cowling
51
. The fan
49
sends cooling air around the cylinder
41
for forced air cooling of the engine
31
.
In this embodiment, 8 permanent magnets
24
of neodymium-iron-boron having 16 (=2n) poles are used. The stator core has 15 (3m=15) teeth or armatures
26
and associated windings
27
. Therefore, n=8, and m=5. In this case, the angle between magnets
24
or the pitch angle θ
1
is 2π/2n (radian)=22.5°. The angle between teeth
25
or the pitch angle θ
2
is 2π/3m (radian)=24°. Coils or windings
27
of the same phase are wound on successive m (=5) teeth
26
. Here, since adjacent teeth
26
are located opposite the magnets
24
of alternately different polarities, the five coils
27
are wound alternately in opposite directions, so that the polarities of voltages induced in respective coils
27
are the same each other. No more than two teeth or armatures
26
are ever associated with any one of the magnets
24
.
Progressing circumferentially along five teeth
26
, the fifth tooth
26
is displaced from the respective magnet
24
by a phase of Δθx (m−1)=Δθ×4=6°. In order that the angle 6° remains within the range of the magnet
24
, it is arranged that the displacement angle is smaller than a half of the pitch angle θ
1
of the magnet
24
, Δθ×4<θ
1
/2. As a result, the voltage induced in the coil
27
can be increased sufficiently. Thus the smooth output waveform output shown in
FIG. 9
also results.
FIG. 10
is a front view of another embodiment of the generator. In this figure, parts that are the same as those in the embodiment of
FIGS. 7 and 8
are provided with the same reference numerals and their descriptions will not be repeated.
This embodiment employs a neodymium-iron-boron magnet
24
with 16 (=2n) poles, and 18 (=3m) teeth or armatures
26
. Therefore, n=8 and m=6. In this case, the angle between magnets
24
for the pitch angle θ
1
is 2π/2n (radian)=22.5°. The angle between teeth or the pitch angle θ
2
is 2π/3m (radian)=20°. Since the number of teeth
26
is the multiple of two, the coils
27
of the same phase (U-phase in
FIG. 10
) are divided into two sets. That is, each set consists of three (=m/2) coils
27
wound on successive three teeth
26
and located symmetrically with respect to the center.
Here, since adjacent teeth
26
face the magnets
24
of different polarities, the coils
27
are wound alternately in opposite directions, so that the voltages induced in respective coils
27
do not have opposite directions from one to another. In this embodiment, the displacement angle of three (=m/2) teeth
26
relative to three magnets
24
, or the phase difference ⊖ is Δθx (m/2−1)=Δθ·2. Therefore ⊖=Δθ·2<θ
1
/2.
As has been noted,
FIGS. 9 and 3
show respectively the distortion of the output voltage waveform obtained with an embodiment of the invention in comparison with that obtained with a conventional arrangement. Here, the embodiment of the invention is the one shown in
FIGS. 7 and 8
with 16 poles and 15 teeth, and the conventional arrangement is the one shown in
FIGS. 1 and 2
with 12 poles and 18 teeth.
FIG. 9
shows phase voltage V
1
and inter-phase voltage V
2
obtained according to the invention, and
FIG. 3
shows phase voltage V
1
and inter-phase voltage V
2
obtained according to the conventional arrangement. As seen from
FIG. 3
, the output voltage waveforms V
1
and V
2
of the conventional arrangement include not only large distortion but also many sharp spike-shaped waveforms and many harmonic components. On the other hand, as seen from
FIG. 9
, the output voltage waveforms V
1
and V
2
of the invention are smooth and include less distortion and harmonic components.
FIGS. 11 and 12
show the phase voltage waveforms obtained by computer simulation analysis.
FIG. 12
shows the result obtained with an embodiment of the invention (with 16 poles and 18 teeth) similar to that shown in FIG.
10
.
FIG. 11
shows the result obtained with a conventional arrangement (with 12 poles and 18 teeth). From these figures, it should be apparent that this invention can reduce distortion in the resultant waveform by reducing the amplitudes of the basic (primary) wave, third order wave, and fifth order wave.
FIGS. 13 and 14
show the inter-phase voltage waveforms obtained by computer simulation analysis.
FIG. 13
shows the result obtained from the phase voltage shown in FIG.
11
.
FIG. 14
shows the result obtained from the phase voltage shown in FIG.
12
.
FIG. 5
shows comparison between an embodiment of the invention (with 16 poles and 18 teeth, indicated as New in the figure) and a conventional arrangement (with 12 poles and 18 teeth, indicated as Conventional in the figure) for driving power, electric output, and efficiency. As seen from the figure, the driving power decreases and the efficiency improves about 10% over the entire range of revolution.
FIG. 6
shows thermal characteristics. In the figure, differential temperature ΔT (° C.) between the stator coil and the stator holder
44
for securing the stator is plotted against the revolution (rpm). As seen from the figure, this invention reduces the coil temperature, by a large margin in comparison with the conventional arrangement, about 40% over the entire revolution range. As a result, room is provided to reduce the size of the stator and rotor by making the stator coil more compact, or from the viewpoint of the generator size, it is possible to provide more power with the same size of the generator.
It should be understood that the foregoing describes only preferred embodiments of the invention and that various changes are possible without varying from the spirit and scope of the invention as set forth in the appended claims. For example, while the above described embodiments use a neodymium-ron-boron magnet for the permanent magnet
24
, this invention also includes arrangement using other permanent magnets such as those using rare-earth and ferrite. Moreover, while the above embodiments are of the outer rotor type with the rotor rotating outside the stator, the invention also includes a inner rotor type in which a rotor rotates radially inside an annular stator.
Claims
- 1. A multi phase generator comprised of relatively rotatably first and second components, said first component having a plurality of segmented, permanent magnets affixed to thereto in circumferentially spaced array, said permanent magnets having adjacent edges and opposite polarity in a direction of relative rotation, said second member having a plurality of armature teeth having coils wound the therearound so that an electrical current will be induced in said coil windings upon relative rotation between said first and second members, same phase coils are wound on the armature teeth disposed in succession in the direction of relative rotation with winding directions reversed and corresponding to changes in the polarity of the permanent magnets opposing respective teeth, said permanent magnets and said armature teeth being configured such that no more than two armature teeth are in registry with a single permanent magnetic during the relative rotation, the number of magnetic poles 2n and the number of teeth 3m are set so that (2π/2n−2π/3m)×(m−1) does not exceed (π/2n).
- 2. A generator as set forth in claim 1 wherein the voltages induced at the armature teeth is the same phase voltage and of the same phase around the circumference of the machine.
- 3. A generator as set forth in claim 1 wherein the number of magnetic poles is equal to 2n and the number of armature teeth is equal to 3m, where n and m are positive integers, and 2n divided by m is not an integer.
- 4. A generator as set forth in claim 3 wherein the voltages induced at the armature teeth is the same phase voltage and of the same phase around the circumference of the machine.
- 5. A generator as set forth in claim 1 wherein the permanent magnets comprise neodymium-iron-boron magnets.
- 6. A generator as set forth in claim 1 wherein the generator is of the three phase type.
- 7. A generator as set forth in claim 6 wherein the number of magnetic polls is equal to 2n and the number of armature teeth is equal to 3m, where n and m are positive integers, and 2n divided by m is not an integer.
- 8. A generator as set forth in claim 7 wherein the number of teeth 3m is an odd number.
- 9. A generator as set forth in claim 6 wherein the number of armature teeth is an even number, and that the coils in the same phase are wound in succession on m/2 teeth arranged in succession in the direction of relative rotation and on m/2 teeth located symmetrically with their winding directions reversed to correspond to changes in polarity of the permanent magnets opposing respective teeth.
- 10. A multi phase generator comprised of relatively rotatably first and second components, said first component having a plurality of segmented, permanent magnets affixed thereto in circumferentially spaced array, said permanent magnets having adjacent edges and opposite polarity in a direction of relative rotation, said second member having a plurality of armature teeth around which coils are wound so that an electrical current will be induced in said coil windings upon relative rotation between said first and second members, the same phase coils are wound on the armature teeth disposed in succession in the direction of relative rotation with their winding directions reversed and corresponding to changes in the polarity of the permanent magnets opposing respective teeth, said permanent magnets and said armature teeth being configured such that no more than two armature teeth are in registry with a single permanent magnet during the relative rotation, the number of armature teeth is a multiple of one of 9 or 3×3×s, and that the coils in the same phase are wound in succession on m/s teeth equally divided by s in succession in the direction of relative rotation and located symmetrically with their winding directions reversed to correspond to changes in the polarity of the permanent magnets opposing respective teeth.
Priority Claims (1)
Number |
Date |
Country |
Kind |
11-288449 |
Oct 1999 |
JP |
|
US Referenced Citations (4)
Number |
Name |
Date |
Kind |
4719378 |
Katsuma et al. |
Jan 1988 |
A |
4864199 |
Dixon |
Sep 1989 |
A |
5436518 |
Kawai |
Jul 1995 |
A |
6252323 |
Nishikawa et al. |
Jun 2001 |
B1 |