The present application relates generally to 3 phase motor diagnostics and phase voltage monitoring, and more particularly to a method and apparatus to provide both motor diagnostics and phase voltage feedback via a single processor A/D input, particularly in connection with a pulse width modulation (PWM) controlled electric motor.
Providing motor diagnostic functions in connection with electronically commutated motors has previously been achieved utilizing diagnostic circuits having a diagnostic output for each motor phase. Voltage levels established at these outputs are delivered to respective A/D inputs of a microcontroller or other processor for conversion and analysis. There is a need for a motor system and method for providing diagnostic feedback and phase voltage level feedback with less outputs so as to reduce the number of A/D channels required for analysis.
In one aspect, a motor system includes a 3-phase DC motor having first, second and third phase windings and a drive circuit for selectively effecting energization of the first, second and third phase windings during motor operation. A diagnostic and phase feedback circuit is connected for indicating, during non-operation of the motor, at least a no fault state, a first fault state and a second fault state. The diagnostic circuit has one diagnostic output line at which (i) a no fault analog voltage condition is established during the no fault state, (ii) a first fault analog voltage condition is established during the first fault state and (iii) a second fault analog voltage condition is established during the second fault state, each of the voltage conditions distinct from each other. A controller has an A/D converter operatively connected with the one diagnostic output line, the controller operable to monitor an output of the A/D converter to identify the presence of each of the no fault state, the first fault state and the second fault state. In one example, (i) the controller identifies the no fault state if voltage at the diagnostic output line is within a first voltage range, (ii) the controller identifies the first fault state if voltage at the diagnostic output line is within a second voltage range and (iii) the controller identifies the second fault state if voltage at the diagnostic output line is within a third voltage range, where the first, second and third voltage ranges are non-overlapping.
Suitable diagnostic feedback and analysis is achieved in an electronically commutated motor by utilizing a diagnostic circuit having a single diagnostic output voltage. Distinct output voltage conditions are established for different fault conditions. The microcontroller may operate to generate distinct fault alert signals in response to the different fault conditions, or alternatively may operate to prevent operation of the motor. Thus, only a single A/D converter of a microcontroller or other processor is used to achieve suitable diagnostic analysis, freeing up other A/D converters of the processor for other uses.
R8∥R9=(R8*R9)/(R8+R9).
The no fault voltage level (VNF) at the diagnostic output 42 is determined as:
VNF=(V1)*[(R8∥R9)/((R1)+(R8∥R9))].
With proper selection of resistance values R1-R9, under a condition where all 3 phases of the motor are disconnected, the voltage level established at the diagnostic output 42 is significantly different from VNF. Resistors R8 and R9 pull motor Phases A and B to ground and resistor R1 pulls motor Phase C to +V1. Resistors R4, R5, and R8 are in series to ground. This combination is in parallel with the series combination of resistors R2, R3, and R9. Resistors R1, R6, and R7 are in series to +V1. The resulting motor disconnected fault voltage level (VMD) established at diagnostic output 42 is determined as:
VMD=(V1)*[(RE2∥RE3)/((RE1)+(RE2∥RE3))], where
RE1=R1+R6+R7;
RE2=R5+R4+R8; and
RE3=R3+R2+R9.
Under a condition where any single phase of the motor is disconnected, the fault voltage level established at the diagnostic output 42 is the resultant voltage of the disconnected phase due to the respective biasing resistor and the resultant voltage divider created by the voltage divider of the remaining 2 biasing resistors and the 2 connected motor phases. For a phase A open fault condition, the fault voltage level (VAO) established at the diagnostic output 42 is determined as:
VAO=(VEQ)*[(RE3)/(RE1+RE2+RE3)], where
RE1=R1∥R8;
RE2=RE4∥RE5;
RE3=R3+R2+R9;
RE4=R4+R5;
RE5=R6+R7; and
VEQ=V1*[(R8)/(i R1+R8)].
For a phase B open fault condition, the fault level voltage (VBO) established at the diagnostic output 42 is determined as:
VBO=(VEQ)*[(RE3)/(RE1+RE2+RE3)], where
RE1=R1∥R9;
RE2=RE4∥RE5;
RE3=R5+R4+R8;
RE4=R2+R3;
RE5=R6+R7; and
VEQ=V1*[(R9)/(R1+R9)].
For a phase C open fault condition, the fault level voltage (VCO) established at the diagnostic output 42 is determined as:
VCO=(V1)*[(RE2)/(RE1+RE2)], where
RE1=R1+R6+R7;
RE2=(RE3∥RE4)+(R8∥R9);
RE3=R3+R2; and
RE4=R4+R5.
In an exemplary implementation of diagnostic circuit 40 where resistor R1 is selected a 1 Kohm, resistors R2-R9 are all selected at 4.99 Kohm and V1 is selected at +5 volts, the following exemplary voltage levels would result:
VNF=3.57 V
VMD=2.03 V
VAO=3.00 V
VBO=3.00 V
VCO=2.03 V
However, it is recognized that these levels could be varied by selection of different component values or via implementation of a varied circuit configuration.
Referring again to
Referring again to
VPHASE=VBOUT*RDIV, where
RDIV=(RE1/(RE1+R4+R5)), where
RE1=(R6+R7)∥R3; and
VBOUT=VBATT*PWM duty cycle of transistor Q6.
Similar analysis and function follows for other commutation states of the motor. In an embodiment where the value of resistors R2, R4, and R6 is the same, and the value of resistors R3, R5, and R7 is the same, RDIV will be the same regardless of which phases are active.
It is to be clearly understood that the above description is intended by way of illustration and example only and is not intended to be taken by way of limitation. Changes and modifications could be made.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4864242 | Hurley | Sep 1989 | A |
| 5448492 | Kolomyski et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5519300 | Leon et al. | May 1996 | A |
| 5574346 | Chavan et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 6448738 | Burton et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6462495 | Copeland | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6469461 | Konda et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6661192 | Copeland | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 20050237212 | Gustafson et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20070205798 A1 | Sep 2007 | US |