The present invention is related to Chinese patent (utility model) application No. 200420001127.7, filed on Apr. 19, 2004, the content of which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
The present invention relates to a reaction apparatus for microarrays, that is particularly suitable to large area microarrays, such as genome-wide DNA microarrays.
DNA microarrays are two-dimensional arrays of reference DNA on glass membranes, microscope slides, or similar substrates. Microarrays are fabricated by spotting small volumes of solution containing reference (probe) DNA onto the substrate. In gene expression profiling assays, cDNA molecules originating from test and control samples competitively bind to the spotted probe molecules on a DNA microarray. The test and the control samples are labeled with two different fluorescent dyes to determine the intensity ratio with a fluorescence scanner. A ratio of one indicates the same expression level and a ratio different from one represents an up- or down-regulation of a respective gene. DNA microarrays can have surfaces covered by thousands of spots, and each spot can contain billions of cDNA probes corresponding to a particular known gene. The targets are poured onto the probe array, the targets hybridize with the complementary probes (if present in the array), and the array is washed to removed target that did not hybridize. This approach allows a parallel, semi-quantitative analysis of thousands of transcription levels in a single experiment. Although the discussion herein uses DNA microarrays as an example, microarrays may also be used for other types of affinity assays than DNA, for example, immunological assays, that rely on the hybridization of biological molecules.
Microarray substrates are often conventional microscope slides with dimensions of 75 by 25 mm. Up to several thousand spots of oligonucleotides or cDNA proves with known identity cover the slide in a two dimensional grid. In a standard experimental set up, a buffered solution containing potential targets is sandwiched between a DNA microarray and a cover slip to form a reaction chamber with an area of several square centimeters and a height of only twenty to a hundred microns. The microarray assembly can be sealed in a humid chamber or placed in a water bath to prevent drying and/or control reaction temperature, and allowed to hybridize for a period of several hours. In such a configuration, diffusion is the only mechanism for DNA strands, or other targets, to move within the reaction chamber. However, diffusion is a notoriously slow process for molecules the size of DNA strands which may need to travel a distance of several centimeters to reach a microarray spot with a complementary probe. In such a case, the immediate vicinity of a probe spot can be quickly depleted, especially in the case of cDNA molecules representing genes with low expression.
This diffusion limitation can lead to low signal-to-noise ratios when a microarray is read because only a fraction of the molecules present in the sample may get a chance to bind to their complimentary spots. Generally speaking, when a microarray's area reaches approximately 22 cm by 22 cm, it can be defined as a large area microarray. For large area microarrays, such as genome-wide DNA microarrays, the diffusion limitation and low signal-to-noise ratios are further exacerbated because of the longer travel distances for the target molecules.
A solution to overcome the diffusion limitation and improve the reaction kinetics for better intensity and uniformity of hybridization is to agitate the target sample solution. The low height and large area of the reaction chamber formed by the microarray and the cover slip can make effective agitation difficult, especially for large area microarrays. Current approaches for agitation of the target sample solution include, for example: (i) microfluidic circulation, (ii) ultrasonic agitation, and (iii) contact with overlayed expanding and contracting air bladders. A drawback of microfluidic circulation is the requirement of three to five times as much target sample solution. The drawbacks of the ultrasonic and air bladder methods include cost and complexity of use, as well as the need for additional consumable materials. Advalytix AG of Brunnthal, Germany markets a line of products based on ultrasonic techniques. BioMicro Systems, Inc. of Salt Lake City, Utah, markets a line of products based on air bladder techniques. Both the ultrasonic and the air bladder techniques are difficult to scale up to handle large area microarrays.
In view of the above discussion, it is very desirable to have a reaction apparatus for use with microarrays that is low cost, easy to use, and capable of effectively agitating large area microarrays.
A low-cost, easy to operate, three-phase tilting agitator for microarrays, including large area microarrays, provides experimentally verified improvements in hybridization intensity and uniformity. Motion is coupled from a single motor to a sample holder via three suspension tethers. The microarrays may be immersed in a water bath during agitation to maintain a temperature for the hybridization reaction. The use of traditional cover slips for microarrays minimizes the volume requirement for target sample solution.
a shows plots of suspension tether lengths above the tether separation plate in an embodiment of the invention.
b shows plots sample plate attachment point heights according to an embodiment of the invention.
a, 4b, and 4c illustrate a sample plate in three different extreme orientations.
a through 7d shows a hybridization result comparison between using microarray agitation according to an example of the present invention in a water bath and traditional microarray incubation without agitation in a water bath as an experimental control.
Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as is commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention belongs. All patents, applications, published applications and other publications referred to herein are incorporated by reference in their entirety. If a definition set forth in this section is contrary to or otherwise inconsistent with a definition set forth in applications, published applications and other publications that are herein incorporated by reference, the definition set forth in this section prevails over the definition that is incorporated herein by reference.
As used herein, “a” or “an” means “at least one” or “one or more.”
Similar numerical references refer to similar features within the various drawings.
Referring to
Suspension tethers 110a, 110b, and 110c can be made of any appropriate material, for example without exclusion: (i) single or multi-strand polymer, (ii) single or multi-strand natural fiber, (ii) single or multi-strand metal or metal alloy, (iv) single or multi-strand composite materials, or (v) chains made of polymer, metal, metal alloy, or composite materials. Suspension tethers 110a, 110b, and 110c can be coupled to sample plate 109 at attachment points 111a, 111b, and 111c, respectively using any one of a variety of mechanical coupling techniques (including passing through a hole near the perimeter of sample plate 109, and tying) that are well known to one of ordinary skill in the mechanical arts.
In the preceding, exemplary embodiments, suspension tethers 110a, 110b, and 110c are coupled to bearing 105 to prevent tangling as radial arm 104 rotates. In other embodiments, suspension tethers 110a, 110b, and 110c can be coupled directly to a radial member.
In some embodiments, orifices 108a, 108b, and 108c of sample plate 106 are configured to reduce friction with and wear to suspension tethers 110a, 110b, and 110c. Such configurations can include, for example, contoured cross-sectional profiles, coating with a low friction material such as polytetrafluroethylene (PTFE), and/or the insertion of a low friction grommet. Although suspension tether separation structure 106 has been illustrated as a disc with three orifices, 108a, 108b, and 108c, in other embodiments equivalent structures for maintaining the separation of suspension cords 110a, 110b, and 110c can be readily identified by one of ordinary skill in the art.
Experimental comparisons of microarray hybridization reactions conducted with agitation by the present invention, and conducted with only diffusive target solution transport (i.e. no agitation) for control purposes, indicate substantial improvements in hybridization intensity and uniformity when conducted with the present invention.
a through 7d shows a hybridization result comparison between using microarray agitation according to the present invention in a water bath and traditional microarray incubation without agitation in a water bath as an experimental control. Otherwise, experimental conditions were identical: (i) identical biological samples, (ii) identical probes, (iii) identical hybridization conditions including use of the coverslip approach, hybridization temperature, hybridization time and so on, (iv) identical washing conditions, and (v) identical fluorescent scanner settings.
The present invention can be implemented in disease diagnostic, biological and agricultural research, food safety detection, forensic authentication and their related fields.
Variations and extensions of the embodiments described are apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art. For example, in reference to
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2004 2 0001127 U | Apr 2004 | CN | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
288853 | Poage | Nov 1883 | A |
705219 | Dempster et al. | Jul 1902 | A |
1871374 | John | Aug 1932 | A |
2646281 | Hurst | Jul 1953 | A |
2757375 | Rieutord et al. | Jul 1956 | A |
2839123 | Summitt | Jun 1958 | A |
4702610 | Reynolds, Jr. | Oct 1987 | A |
5921676 | Reynolds et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
6942184 | Morris | Sep 2005 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2 230 711 | Nov 1973 | DE |
2 501 057 | Sep 1982 | FR |
WO-9628243 | Sep 1996 | WO |
WO-2004034014 | Apr 2004 | WO |
WO-2004037400 | May 2004 | WO |
WO-2004105925 | Dec 2004 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060030032 A1 | Feb 2006 | US |