The present invention relates generally to fasteners and more particularly to a three-point fastener for transmitting torque from a tool to the fastener.
Fasteners are used in numerous applications to attach various components together. Typically, a fastener has at least a threaded portion and one or more bearing surfaces attached thereto. The bearing surfaces are designed to receive torque from a tool, such as a socket or wrench, which is used to tighten or loosen the fastener. In a conventional fastener, such as a nut, the fastener may have internal threads and six bearing surfaces oriented in a hexagon shape around the internal threads. However, other fasteners may have external threads, such as bolts and screws.
The most common shape of a tool to apply torque to threaded fasteners is a hexagon or hexagon-like geometry socket. Accordingly, many fasteners have a hexagon shape. Applying torque with a hexagon or hexagon-like geometry socket to fasteners creates contact between the socket and fastener at six places, namely, at or near each corner of the hexagon fastener. In contrast, a standard open-end wrench applies torque to fasteners at two places, namely, at opposite corners of the hexagon fastener. This common usage of open-end wrenches with hexagon fasteners demonstrates the strength that exists in hexagon fasteners at the torque bearing surfaces.
To meet ever increasing global demands for energy efficiency, automobile manufacturers have expressed the need to reduce the mass of vehicles to help meet government requirements for increasing fuel efficiency. The inventor believes the design of fasteners can be improved to lower weight, while maintaining the highest industry standards for durability and function.
In one embodiment, a fastener comprises a threaded portion and a bearing portion. The bearing portion includes three bearing surfaces designed to receive torque from a tool and transmit torque to the threaded portion. Each bearing surface includes two adjacent sides with an edge disposed between them. The bearing portion also includes three non-bearing surfaces located between each of the bearing surfaces.
The invention can be better understood with reference to the following drawings and description. The components in the figures are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead being placed upon illustrating the principles of the invention. Moreover, in the figures, like referenced numerals designate corresponding parts throughout the different views.
A standard hexagon shaped fastener includes a torque bearing surface with six sides that intersect at the six corners of the hexagon to create six edges between the six sides. The angle at each corner is approximately 120 degrees.
Referring now to the figures,
Fastener 100 may include a torque bearing portion 106. The torque bearing portion 106 may extend the entire axial length of fastener 100 or may only extend along part of the axial length of fastener 100. Bearing portion 106 may include three torque bearing surfaces 108, 110, 112 that may be designed to receive torque from a tool, such as a socket or wrench, and transmit torque to the threaded portion 102.
Each torque bearing surface 108, 110, 112 may include two torque bearing sides with an edge 114, 116, 118 between the sides. Torque bearing surface 108 may include torque bearing sides 108a and 108b with edge 114 between the sides. Torque bearing surface 110 may include torque bearing sides 110a and 110b with edge 116 between the sides. Torque bearing surface 112 may include torque bearing sides 112a and 112b with edge 118 between the sides. The height of each torque bearing side 108a, 108b, 110a, 110b, 112a, 112b may be the height of the bearing portion 106 in an axial direction. Each torque bearing side 108a, 108b, 110a, 110b, 112a, 112b may be designed to receive torque from a tool, such as a socket or wrench, and transmit torque to the threaded portion 102 depending if the tool is tightening or loosening fastener 100. For example, if the tool is tightening fastener 100, torque bearing sides 108a, 110a, 112a may receive torque from the tool and transfer the torque to the threaded portion 102. Whereas if the tool is loosening fastener 100, torque bearing sides 108b, 110b, 112b may receive torque from the tool and transfer the torque to the threaded portion 102. The torque bearing side that receives and transfers torque when fastener 100 is being tightened or loosened may be switched depending on the direction of the threads in threaded portion 102.
Edges 114, 116, 118 may extend the entire axial length of bearing portion 106. Edges 114, 116, 118 may be located at the mid-point of torque bearing surface 108, 110, 112, respectively, such that the widths of each corresponding torque bearing side 108a, 108b, 110a, 110b, 112a, 112b are the same. For example, the widths of torque bearing sides 108a and 108b may be the same. Alternatively, the widths of any or all of the torque bearing sides may be different than any or all of the other torque bearing sides.
Fastener 100 may be designed and shaped to be driven by standard socket tools, such as a hexagon socket or a 12 point configuration socket. Accordingly, the angle at edges 114, 116, 118 where the torque bearing sides intersect may be approximately 120 degrees to match the angle of a standard hexagon shaped socket. Additionally, the edges 114, 116, 118 may be equally spaced around the longitudinal axis of fastener 100 to match a standard hexagon shaped socket.
Bearing portion 106 may also include three non-torque bearing surfaces 120, 122, 124. The non-torque bearing surfaces 120, 122, 124 may not be intended to receive and transfer torque from a tool to the threaded portion 102. The non-torque bearing surfaces 120, 122, 124 may, however, incidentally receive and transfer torque from a tool to the threaded portion 102 even if the non-torque bearing surfaces 120, 122, 124 are not intended to do so.
The non-torque bearing surfaces 120, 122, 124 may be located adjacent to and between the torque bearing surface 108, 110, 112 such that torque bearing surface 108, 110, 112 are not adjacent to each other. The non-torque bearing surfaces 120, 122, 124 may be flat. The non-torque bearing surfaces 120, 122, 124 may extend the entire axial length of bearing portion 106.
Fastener 100 may have a reduced mass compared to a standard fastener of similar size designed for the same application as fastener 100. The reduce mass of fastener 100 may be due to the presence of the non-torque bearing surfaces 120, 122, 124 in place of torque bearing corners that would be located on standard fasteners. For example, the mass reduction of fastener 100 over an M12×1.75 thread×19.0 mm across flats×12.0 mm high standard hexagon nut would be between 9-11%, and preferable approximately 11% plus or minus 0.5%. In grams mass, this is a reduction from 18.3 to 16.9 grams.
The increased angles at edges 214, 216, 218 of fastener 200, in comparison to the angles of fastener 100, may be caused by recessed regions 208a_r, 208b_r, 210a_r, 210b_r, 212a_r, 212b_r of the torque bearing sides 208a, 208b, 210a, 210b, 212a, 212b adjacent to edges 214, 216, 218, as shown by the space within the dotted line in
Fastener 300 may have a reduced mass compared to a standard fastener of similar size due to the modified torque bearing surfaces 308, 310, 312 and modified non-torque bearing surfaces 320, 322, 324. For example, the mass reduction of fastener 300 may be approximately 17% compared to a standard fastener of similar size designed for the same application as fastener 300. The size reduction and/or curvature of torque bearing surfaces 308, 310, 312 and non-torque bearing surfaces 320, 322, 324 may be adjusted to increase or decrease the mass reduction of fastener 300.
Fastener 400 may have a reduced mass compared to a standard fastener of similar size due to the modified torque bearing surfaces 408, 410, 412 and modified non-torque bearing surfaces 420, 422, 424. The mass reduction of fastener 400 may be less than the mass reduction of fastener 300 due to the angles of torque bearing surfaces 408, 410, 412 and non-torque bearing surfaces 420, 422, 424. The angles of torque bearing surfaces 408, 410, 412 and non-torque bearing surfaces 420, 422, 424 may be adjusted to increase or decrease the mass reduction of fastener 400.
Similar to fastener 100, each torque bearing surface 508, 510, 512 may include two torque bearing sides with an edge 514, 516, 518 between the sides. Fastener 500 may be designed and shaped to be driven by standard socket tools, such as a hexagon socket or a 12 point configuration socket. Accordingly, the angle at edges 514, 516, 518 where the torque bearing sides intersect may be approximately 120 degrees to match the angle of a standard hexagon shaped socket. Additionally, the edges 514, 516, 518 may be equally spaced around the longitudinal axis of fastener 500 to match a standard hexagon shaped socket.
Fastener 500 may have a reduced mass compared to a standard fastener of similar size due to the presence of the non-torque bearing surfaces 520, 522, 524 in place of torque bearing corners that would be located on standard fasteners. For example, the mass reduction of fastener 500 over an M12×1.75 thread×18.0 mm across flats×12.0 mm high standard hexagon nut would be approximately 36%. In grams mass, this is a reduction from 17.5 to 11.1 grams.
Cap 652 may surround the upper portion of nut 650, including bearing portion 606 and the torque bearing surface 608, 610, 612 and the non-torque bearing surfaces 620, 622, 624. Cap 652 may fit tightly around nut 650. Accordingly, cap 652 may include similar torque bearing surfaces and non-torque bearing surfaces. Cap 652 may be crimped around nut 650. Cap 652 and its attachment to nut 650 is described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/976,190, which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Similar to fasteners 100, 200, 300, 400, and 500, fastener 600 may be driven by standard socket tools, such as a hexagon socket or a 12 point configuration socket. Fastener 600 may have a reduced mass compared to a standard fastener of similar size due to the presence of the non-torque bearing surfaces 620, 622, 624 in place of torque bearing corners that would be located on standard fasteners.
While several embodiments of the fastener has been described, it should be understood that the fasteners are not so limited, and modifications may be made without departing from the disclosures herein. While each embodiment described herein may refer only to certain features and may not specifically refer to every feature described with respect to other embodiments, it should be recognized that the features described herein are interchangeable unless described otherwise, even where no reference is made to a specific feature. It should also be understood that the advantages described above are not necessarily the only advantages of the fastener, and it is not necessarily expected that all of the described advantages will be achieved with every embodiment of the fasteners. The scope of the disclosure is defined by the appended claims, and all devices and methods that come within the meaning of the claims, either literally or by equivalence, are intended to be embraced therein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2248695 | Bradshaw | Jul 1941 | A |
2248696 | Bradshaw | Jul 1941 | A |
2969250 | Kull | Jan 1961 | A |
3003379 | Pribitzer | Oct 1961 | A |
3396765 | Ridenour | Aug 1968 | A |
3456548 | Schmidt et al. | Jul 1969 | A |
3584667 | Reiland | Jun 1971 | A |
3885480 | Muenchinger | May 1975 | A |
4006660 | Yamamoto et al. | Feb 1977 | A |
4073160 | Perret | Feb 1978 | A |
4260005 | Stencel | Apr 1981 | A |
4361412 | Stolarczyk | Nov 1982 | A |
4459074 | Capuano | Jul 1984 | A |
4938731 | Nguyen et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
5019080 | Hemer | May 1991 | A |
5324149 | Bainbridge | Jun 1994 | A |
5378101 | Olson et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5577871 | Brugola | Nov 1996 | A |
5628602 | Ohsawa | May 1997 | A |
5674036 | Hsieh | Oct 1997 | A |
5772377 | Bydalek | Jun 1998 | A |
6343531 | Amis | Feb 2002 | B2 |
6632057 | Fauchet | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6655888 | Schultz | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6736580 | Schultz | May 2004 | B2 |
7073416 | Kozak et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7108510 | Niznick | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7128513 | Walker | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7207248 | Panasik et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7225710 | Pacheco, Jr. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7331743 | Schultz | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7331744 | Schultz | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7568872 | Schultz | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7857563 | Pratt | Dec 2010 | B2 |
8291795 | Hughes et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8429875 | Bartlett | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8491247 | Wilson | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8616097 | Hughes et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8747044 | Garver | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8997608 | Merrick | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9138873 | Merrick | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9278434 | Merrick | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9644660 | Garver | May 2017 | B2 |
9662775 | Merrick | May 2017 | B2 |
9868188 | Merrick | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9957993 | Pritchard | May 2018 | B2 |
9964133 | Bjelobradic et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
20030044257 | Siegel et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030158555 | Sanders et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20060062650 | Keener | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20090220321 | Sakamura | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090285653 | Schultz | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20110070051 | Chang | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20130286668 | Ishida et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20150343615 | Merrick | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160131170 | Landsmann | May 2016 | A1 |
20160252125 | Lares | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160273591 | Goss | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160312816 | Bjelobradic et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20170050300 | Lukes et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20180003241 | Goss | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180193986 | Tissieres | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180298933 | Wilson et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
297 09 124 | Jul 1997 | DE |
203 21 249 | Oct 2006 | DE |
10 2011 012 994 | Sep 2012 | DE |
10 2013 021 238 | Jun 2015 | DE |
0 926 362 | Jun 1999 | EP |
0 961 042 | Dec 1999 | EP |
1 162 376 | Dec 2001 | EP |
1 632 683 | Mar 2006 | EP |
2 022 992 | Feb 2009 | EP |
2 363 245 | Sep 2011 | EP |
1 765 214 | May 2016 | EP |
3 115 153 | Jan 2017 | EP |
3 388 694 | Oct 2018 | EP |
1 309 208 | Nov 1962 | FR |
2 361 568 | Mar 1978 | FR |
1564 684 | Feb 1978 | GB |
WO 2003062650 | Jul 2003 | WO |
WO 2003068093 | Aug 2003 | WO |
WO 2004005731 | Jan 2004 | WO |
WO 2005082641 | Sep 2005 | WO |
WO 20056082641 | Sep 2005 | WO |
WO 2006130490 | Dec 2006 | WO |
WO 2010014881 | Feb 2010 | WO |
WO 2015086196 | Jun 2015 | WO |
WO 2016149526 | Sep 2016 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“Torx Plus Drive System;” Infastech Intellectual Properties Pte. Ltd.; 2011; 15p; Decorah, IA. |
Rudd, Matthew; Patentability Search for “Hybrid 6-Lobe—Hex Nut/Bolt;” Cardinal Intellectual Property; Nov. 23, 2016; 11p; Evanston, IL. |
European Search Report for EP Application No. 18165826.1 dated Sep. 6, 201 (8 pgs.). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180298933 A1 | Oct 2018 | US |