1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to the field of three-way valves, and fuel injectors using three-way valves.
2. Prior Art
Embodiments of the present invention provide improved devices for fluid control in various applications. A typical example is the control of a high pressure fuel injector. Typically, two-way poppet valves (open and closed) are used due to their superior leakage characteristics (low) and the ability to pressure balance a two-way poppet valve. It is highly desirable to use a three-way valve for improved performance and control, but this is difficult due to a three-way valve's inability to pressure balance completely unless it is a spool valve, which leaks excessively. For purposes of this disclosure, a three-way valve will be described as a valve coupling a supply (S) passage to a control (C) passage or coupling the control passage to a vent (V), though other port identifications may be more appropriate depending on the use of the three-way valve.
The choices for a three-way valve are:
Spool valve. A spool valve can create the required hydraulic paths, but while in either position (S-C or C-V) the valve has a very short leak (seal) path from a high-pressure area to a vented area, which can lead to high system parasitic losses. This valve can be designed to have a hydraulic short circuit (momentarily coupling of supply and vent when transitioning from one position to the other) or not, depending on the application. The advantages are primarily in its pressure balance, thereby requiring very low actuation forces, and in the ability to be designed to avoid the short circuit.
Three-way hard-seat valve (Poppet). This type of valve can have no leakage in either position, but when the valve is transitioning from one position to the other, there necessarily . exists a direct flow path between the supply and the vent that could lead to large losses of energy and system noise. This type of valve cannot be completely pressure balanced, and therefore requires more actuating forces than a typical pressure balanced spool valve.
Two two-way hard-seat valves (Poppet). This option has no leakage and can have a direct flow path between the supply and the vent or not, depending on control of the system. The disadvantage of this system is that twice as many control valves are needed to achieve three-way control, adding system and control complexity, and further requires more room to package.
Thus the current choices and their disadvantages are:
Spool Valve: High static leakage.
Three-way hard-seat valve: High actuating force requirements (due to pressure imbalance) and short circuit loss.
Two, two-way hard seat valves: Cost and complexity.
Also known are three-way ball valves. Here a ball is moveable from one seat to an opposing seat, allowing fluid communication between a port at the side of the ball through whichever seat is uncovered by the ball. With the supply of pressure through one seat and the control at the side of the ball and the vent through the other seat, there is a momentary flow path between the supply and the vent during the transition of the ball from one seat to the other.
First referring to
In the position shown, the spool 20 is pushed downward by spring loaded or hydraulically actuated member 21 and is in its lowermost position, closing the poppet valve 22 against the poppet valve seat 24 at the upper region thereof. This prevents leakage of any fluid through the small gaps of the spool valve out that end to the vent. In this position, the spool 20 allows fluid communication between the supply port 28 and the control port 30, which in the direct injector needle control application, keeps the injector needle closed in spite of the intensified fuel pressure surrounding the needle.
In the embodiment shown, when solenoid coil 38 is activated, armature member 40 rises, pulling spool member 20 upward. During the first part of the upward movement of the spool 20, the poppet valve begins to open, even before the spool 20 moves upward far enough to close the flow path between the supply port 28 and the control port 30. However during this time, land 42 blocks free communication between the control port 30 and the vent 32,34 until fluid communication between the supply port 28 and the control port 30 is blocked by the spool valve. Then land 42 will move entirely into the vicinity of relief 36, now allowing free fluid communication between the control port 30 and the vent 32,34. Thus the three-way spool poppet valve of the present invention combines the leak-proof performance of a poppet valve with a spool valve, but at the same time eliminating the usual short circuit, that is, the momentary fluid communication between a supply port and a vent port characteristic of a three-way poppet valve.
The spool poppet valve of the present invention will remain substantially pressure balanced even with a substantial pressure on the poppet valve itself. In particular, referring to
Thus this embodiment of the invention creates a three-way hydraulic control valve using a unique combination of a poppet seat and a spool valve. The valve is normally on the poppet seat. On the guide portion of the valve, a port exists, creating a spool valve for the third way flow. Since the porting is arranged to flow from supply to control in this position, leakage is controlled by a long guide and the poppet seat and is therefore very low. Additionally (by way of another relief on the guide portion of the valve) this valve can now eliminate the hydraulic short circuit (HSC) of supply fluid to vent while the valve is transitioning from one position to the other (i.e. supply-control to control-vent). This is unique and beneficial also in the sense that the valve does not need to close on the poppet seat against flow across the poppet seat, as all flow to vent, other than spool valve leakage, is stopped by the spool valve. Thus this valve combines the advantages of a spool valve (low actuation forces due to pressure balance and possibility of no short circuit) with the advantages of a two-way poppet (pressure balance and low leak condition). Thus the valve requires low actuation forces due to pressure balance (for optimum packaging and low mass), low leakage and the option of no short circuit. This valve can therefore be a three-way valve used at very high pressures where a poppet valve is typically used, but only as a two-way. A pressure balanced, three-way, low leakage valve is highly desired for fuel system applications as one example, for direct control of needle motion in a diesel fuel injector.
An alternate embodiment is shown in
There are various ways of actuating the valves of the type represented in
Another form of novel three-way valve may be seen in
The valves of the present invention are well suited for various applications, one of which is in diesel fuel injectors. By way of example,
A further improvement on the ball valve 68 of
Thus the three-way spool poppet valves disclosed herein provide a substantially leak proof valve when in one position, yet preserve the advantages of a three-way spool valve. The ball valves of the present invention provide a substantially leak proof valve when in either position, as is characteristic of ball valves, though further include means for minimizing the short circuit flow path from a high pressure supply directly to a low pressure vent as the ball transitions from one position to the opposite position. These features are useful and advantageous in many applications, one of which is in fuel injectors, as also disclosed herein. Thus while certain preferred embodiments and applications of the present invention have been disclosed and described herein for purposes of illustration and not for purposes of limitation, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and detail may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/638,896 filed Dec. 21, 2004.
The U.S. Government has certain rights in this invention pursuant to Contract No. W56HZV-04-C-0677 awarded by the United States Army.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2751923 | Towler et al. | Jun 1956 | A |
2837148 | Jay | Jun 1958 | A |
2971090 | Piet et al. | Feb 1961 | A |
3036598 | Smith et al. | May 1962 | A |
3202182 | Haviland | Aug 1965 | A |
3339586 | Tenkku et al. | Sep 1967 | A |
3527253 | Harpman | Sep 1970 | A |
3720221 | Hufeld et al. | Mar 1973 | A |
3741247 | Kaemmer | Jun 1973 | A |
3743898 | Sturman | Jul 1973 | A |
3768517 | Pauliukonis | Oct 1973 | A |
3776275 | Updike | Dec 1973 | A |
4004603 | Jones | Jan 1977 | A |
4016716 | Evans et al. | Apr 1977 | A |
4298027 | Neff | Nov 1981 | A |
4332368 | Woloszczuk | Jun 1982 | A |
4641118 | Hirose et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4823825 | Buchl | Apr 1989 | A |
4880033 | Neff | Nov 1989 | A |
5193781 | Willbanks | Mar 1993 | A |
5207059 | Schexnayder | May 1993 | A |
5211198 | Tinholt | May 1993 | A |
5213133 | Ellett | May 1993 | A |
5351601 | Zeuner et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5460329 | Sturman | Oct 1995 | A |
5463996 | Maley | Nov 1995 | A |
5485957 | Sturman | Jan 1996 | A |
5497806 | Swank et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5640987 | Sturman | Jun 1997 | A |
5673669 | Maley | Oct 1997 | A |
5697342 | Anderson et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5918635 | Wang et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5970956 | Sturman | Oct 1999 | A |
6012644 | Sturman et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6038957 | Ertmann et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6082332 | Hefler et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6085991 | Sturman | Jul 2000 | A |
6145806 | Dettmann | Nov 2000 | A |
6161770 | Sturman | Dec 2000 | A |
6170524 | Gray, Jr. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6174219 | Mathews | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6209565 | Hughes et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6209577 | Lai et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6257499 | Sturman | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6360728 | Sturman | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6371382 | Niethammer et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6425375 | Hefler et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6655602 | Shafer et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6668861 | Williams | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6715694 | Gebhardt | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6739293 | Turner et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6749130 | Cotton | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6806793 | Bhatia et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6837451 | Rodriguez-Amaya et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6918409 | Parker | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6957664 | Suilmann et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
7032574 | Sturman | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7210501 | Neff et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
20020029765 | Giavi et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20030155437 | Lei | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040149264 | Pecheny et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040188537 | Sturman | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040238657 | Sturman | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20070113906 | Sturman et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070246014 | Pena et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070267076 | Strauss et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1803578 | Jul 1970 | DE |
0621426 | Oct 1994 | EP |
2180789 | Nov 1973 | FR |
2354499 | Jan 1978 | FR |
631750 | Nov 1949 | GB |
2352798 | Feb 2001 | GB |
2002-351306 | Dec 2002 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060157581 A1 | Jul 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60638896 | Dec 2004 | US |