(Not Applicable)
The present invention relates generally to wheeled vehicles and, more particularly, to a uniquely configured three-wheeled, rear-steering scooter having a single front wheel and a pair of smaller-diameter rear wheels wherein the scooter is specifically adapted to be steered by an operator due to angular yawing of the rear wheels in response to lateral rolling or tilting of a chassis to which the rear wheels are pivotally mounted.
Scooters are well known in the prior art and are available in a wide variety of configurations with each configuration possessing certain advantages that allow a rider or operator to perform certain maneuvers that cannot be performed with other scooter configurations. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 6,250,656 issued to Ibarra discloses a scooter having an elongated footboard supported at its rear by a pair of small diameter wheels and at its front end by a large diameter front wheel. The scooter includes positive steering capability via a pivotable front wheel that is steerable by an operator via handlebar assembly. The footboard includes an upwardly angled flat portion located aft of the rear wheels and which is oriented at an angle to allow upward pitching of the scooter in response to the operator stepping on the flat portion such that the operator may perform “wheelies”, and allowing the scooter to jump over objects.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,620,189 issued to Hinderhofer discloses a scooter having a frame assembly which includes a footboard at a rear of the frame assembly and a large-diameter front wheel located at a front end of the scooter. The rear of the footboard is supported by at least one unsteerable rear wheel preferably located below the footboard. Alternatively, the scooter may include a plurality of rear wheels which may be arranged in an in-line configuration which provide a plurality of rolling surfaces to facilitate gliding movement over uneven terrain such as stair steps or street curbs. Steering of the scooter is facilitated by means of a handlebar assembly by which a rider may pivot the front wheel and therefore steel the scooter in a conventional manner.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,739,606 issued to Rappaport discloses a dual-footboard scooter provided in a tricycle arrangement having a front wheel of relatively large diameter and being joined to a frame. The frame extends rearwardly in a bifurcated arrangement to form two branches, each of which is supported by a single rear wheel. Each of the branches includes a generally horizontally-oriented footboard supported at its rear end by the rear wheel. An operator may rest one foot on one of the footboards while making pushing contact with the ground in order to propel the scooter forward. Steering of the scooter is effectuated by the front wheel which is pivotable by means of a handlebar assembly for steering the scooter.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,220,612 issued to Beleski discloses a three-wheeled scooter configured as a “cambering vehicle” having a single steerable front wheel and a pair of rear wheels disposed on separate trailing arms. Each of the trailing arms is articulably to a front column from which the front wheel extends. Forward motion of the scooter is generated by the operator alternating shifting of weight from side-to-side as the scooter travels a sinusoidal path produced by the operator steering the front wheel left and right by means of a handlebar assembly. The simultaneous shifting of weight from one side to the other in combination with the steering of the vehicle produces a series of accelerations under the principle of conservation of angular momentum which results in forward motion of the scooter.
The prior art includes additional alternative scooter configurations in addition to the above described scooter arrangements. A majority of the prior art scooters facilitate directional control of the scooter by means of a pivotable front wheel which is coupled to a handlebar assembly by which the operator may steer the scooter. Furthermore, many of the scooter arrangements of the prior art are configured such that the front and rear wheels are spaced a relatively large distance from one another such that the scooter is incapable of performing short-radius turns. Even further, many of the scooter arrangements of the prior art include conventional bicycle handlebars comprising a pair of laterally outwardly extending arm members which require gripping by both of the rider's hands for effective control and steering of the scooter in a stabilized manner.
As may be appreciated, there exists a need in the art for a scooter providing an operator or rider with the capability to execute turns of varying radii including relatively short-radius turns in order to increase the range of maneuvers that may be performed. Furthermore, there exists a need in the art for a scooter that may be operated by the rider in a standing position but which eliminates the need for steering the scooter by turning a handlebar using the rider's hands.
Additionally, there exists a need in the art for a scooter which provides a means for stabilizing or balancing the rider in order to allow adults as well as children to operate the scooter without the risk of injury as a result of falling from the scooter. Finally, there exists a need in the art for a scooter which is of simple construction, low cost, reduced size and of relatively low weight in order to enhance the scooter's maneuverability and to facilitate transportation and storage of the scooter.
The present invention specifically addresses the above-described needs by providing a three-wheeled, rear-steering scooter having the capability to execute turns of varying radii including relatively short radius turns. The three-wheeled, rear-steering scooter comprises a chassis having a relatively large diameter front wheel fixedly mounted at a forward end of the chassis and a pair of smaller diameter rear wheels pivotally-mounted at an aft end of the chassis. In one embodiment, the scooter is configured to allow steering by angular yawing of the rear wheels relative to the chassis. Such angular yawing is effectuated by asymmetric loading of the chassis which causes lateral rolling of the chassis. The lateral rolling may be induced by uneven weighting of left and right sides of the chassis which, in turn, causes the rear wheels to pivot or yaw for steering control of the scooter.
In its broadest sense, the scooter comprises the chassis, the non-pivotable (i.e., non-steerable) front wheel mounted to the forward end of the chassis and an angularly-yawable pair of rear wheels mounted to the aft end of the chassis. The chassis defines a longitudinal axis extending between the forward and aft ends. The chassis may comprise a generally horizontally-oriented support assembly extending from the forward end to the aft end for supporting a rider or operator in a standing position.
Optionally, the scooter may include a handle assembly located forward of the support assembly and extending upwardly therefrom. The handle assembly may be configured as a single vertical member having a gripping potion (i.e., a hand grip) for gripping by one of the rider's hands. Alternatively, the handle assembly may be configured as a pair of lateral members each having gripping portions similar to the configuration of conventional handlebars. Regardless of its configuration, the handle assembly provides a means for stabilizing the rider or operator of the scooter.
The rear wheels are preferably disposed laterally relative to one another and, as was mentioned above, are specifically configured to be angularly yawable relative to the longitudinal axis. In this regard, the rear wheels are adapted to pivot or yaw between a neutral position and a yawed position. In the neutral position, the axis of the rear wheels oriented perpendicularly relative to the longitudinal axis. In the yawed position, the rear wheels are oriented in a non-perpendicular arrangement relative to the longitudinal axis. Direction control or steering of the scooter is effectuated solely or primarily as a result of angular yawing of the rear wheels between the neutral and yawed positions.
The support assembly is preferably configured to laterally roll about the longitudinal axis. Such lateral rolling may be effectuated by asymmetric loading of one of right and left sides of the support assembly. The asymmetric loading may be induced by the rider applying downward pressure to the left or right side of the support assembly such as by uneven weighting using the rider's feet. This asymmetric loading and lateral rolling of the support assembly induces the angular yawing motion of the rear wheels which causes the scooter to turn.
Preferably, the rear wheels are pivotally mounted to the support assembly by means of a trunnion comprising a rear axle. In one embodiment, the rear wheels are mounted on opposing ends of the axle. The trunnion is attached to the support assembly by means of a pivot shaft which extends upwardly from the rear axle. The pivot shaft interconnects the rear axle to the support assembly. Biasing members may be incorporated into the mounting of the rear axle to the support assembly. The biasing member may provide a self-steering or self-stabilizing characteristic to the rear axle, as will be described in greater detail below.
Ideally, the pivot shaft is oriented in an inclined manner relative to the longitudinal axis. More specifically, the pivot shaft may have upper and lower ends and is inclined such that the lower end is located forward of the upper end. In this manner, the pivot shaft is oriented downwardly along a direction from the aft end of the chassis toward the forward end. The downward inclination of the pivot shaft results in angular yawing of the rear wheels at the same time the support assembly rolls laterally to the right or left. The lateral rolling motion of the support assembly is in proportion to the degree of angular yawing of the rear wheel. The net effect of this combination of motions allows a rider to lean into a turn with greater yaw angles of the rear wheels corresponding to greater amounts of lateral rolling motion of the support assembly.
For example, if the rider wishes to execute a right turn of the scooter, the rider asymmetrically loads the right side of the support assembly resulting in the right side laterally rolling or pivoting downwardly about the longitudinal axis while the left side of the support assembly pivots upwardly. Simultaneously, the rear axle is caused to yaw angularly such that the rear wheel on the right side of the longitudinal axis moves forward while the rear wheel on the left side moves aft. This angular yawing causes a the scooter to be redirected toward the right (i.e., point toward the right) during forward movement of the scooter.
It is contemplated that the trunnion may be configured such that the yawing capability of the rear axle relative to the longitudinal axis is a half-angle of at least about 45°. However, the trunnion may be configured to allow yawing of the rear axle up to half-angles of lesser or greater amounts. A biasing member may optionally be included with the trunnion and is operatively connectable to the trunnion. The biasing member is preferably configured to bias the rear axis toward the neutral position in order to provide a self-steering mechanism. In this manner, the rear axle is urged back toward a non-yawed position (i.e., neutral position) following each turn.
The biasing member further provides a self-stabilizing mechanism for the scooter whereby the rear axle may better resist unwanted wobbling or oscillations in the support assembly when the scooter is traveling at high speed. Even further, the biasing member provides a self-parking feature wherein the support assembly returns to a horizontal or level orientation when the rider dismounts the scooter. The handle assembly will also return to a vertical orientation when the rider dismounts the scooter or when the scooter is stationary.
Optionally, the scooter may include an articulated joint at the forward end of the support or assembly. Alternatively, the articulated joint may be positioned so as to interconnect the support assembly to the handle assembly. Regardless of its specific location on the chassis, the articulated joint advantageously provides an alternative means for facilitating the lateral rolling motion of the support assembly. More specifically, the articulated joint allows for lateral rolling motion of the support assembly upon which the rider stands in a direction opposite that of the handle assembly. The articulated joint may provide an alternative mode of propelling the scooter forward as a result of lateral rolling the support frame out-of-phase with the handle assembly in a manner as will be described in greater detail below.
The scooter may optionally include a suspension system operatively coupled to at least one of the front and rear wheels to absorb shock that would otherwise be transmitted to the rider during travel over uneven terrain. More specifically, the suspension system is preferably configured to allow for vertical deflection of the front and/or rear wheels relative to the chassis as may be desirable when encountering gravel, cracks in pavement, or other natural or manmade obstacles.
These as well as other features of the present invention will become more apparent upon reference to the drawings wherein:
a is an enlarged side view of the chassis assembly illustrating an inclined orientation of an axis about which the rear wheels pivot and which facilitates angular yawing of the rear wheels for steering of the scooter;
b is an aft view of the rear wheels and illustrating the independent pivotal mounting of each rear wheel and the coupling of the rear wheels to facilitate their angular yawing in unison;
a is a top view of the scooter taken along line 4a of
Referring now to the drawings wherein the various showings are for purposes of illustrating preferred embodiments of the present invention and not for purposes of limiting the same, shown in the figures is a three-wheeled rear-steering scooter 10. In its broadest sense, the scooter 10 comprises a chassis 18 having a front wheel 44 and a pair of rear wheels 56 pivotally mounted to the chassis 18 so as to be angularly yawable to allow for steering of the scooter 10. As can be seen in
The front wheel 44 is non-pivotally (i.e., non-steerably) mounted at the forward end 12 of the chassis 18. The chassis 18 may further include an optional handle assembly 32 which is preferably located forward of the support assembly 24 and which extends upwardly from the support assembly 24 as shown in
Alternatively, the handle assembly 32 and support assembly 24 may be interconnected by an articulated joint 30 to allow relative lateral rolling motion therebetween, as will be described in greater detail below. The handle assembly 32 is configured to provide a means by which the rider or operator 16 may be stabilized or balanced in a standing position while riding the scooter 10. For embodiments where the support assembly 24 and handle assembly 32 are rigidly interconnected, the handle assembly 32 also provides a means for steering the scooter 10 as a result of the rider inducing lateral or sideways motion of the handle assembly 32. Because of the rigid connection between the handle assembly 32 and the support assembly 24, lateral rolling motion of the handle assembly 32 is transmitted to the support assembly 24. The resultant lateral rolling motion of the support assembly 24 induces the angular yawing motion of the rear wheels 56 by which the scooter 10 is steered, as will be described in greater detail below.
As best seen in
As can be seen in
Referring briefly to
In one embodiment, such as that shown in
In a preferred embodiment, the pivot shaft 62 is disposed in a non-vertical and non-horizontal orientation such that asymmetric loading of the support assembly 24 causes the angular yawing of the rear wheels 56. Even more preferably, the pivot shaft 62 is preferably oriented at pivot axis angle θ such that lateral rolling of the support assembly 24 causes the rear wheel 56 on that side to move forward while the rear wheel 56 on the opposing side moves aft. Such an arrangement allows the operator 16 to lean into the turn at progressively greater amounts in proportion to the extent of the lateral rolling motion.
Advantageously, the ability to lean into the turns allows the operator 16 to counteract the effects of centrifugal force which tend to throw the rider toward the outside of the turning radius. Although the pivot shaft 62 is preferably oriented to allow a rider to lean into the turn (i.e., facilitates movement of the rider's center of gravity toward the inside of the turn radius), it is contemplated that the pivot shaft 62 may be oriented in a variety of other arrangements. For example, the pivot shaft 62 may be oriented such that asymmetric loading of one side of the support assembly 24 results in angular yawing of the rear wheels 56 in an opposite direction.
However, as best seen in
As was earlier mentioned, when the support assembly 24 is laterally rolled to the left or to the right, the inclined pivot shaft 62 allows for mechanical steering of the rear wheels 56 in yaw at a direction opposite the direction of intended turning of the scooter 10. For example, if the operator 16 wishes to execute a right turn of the scooter 10, the operator 16 may asymmetrically load the right side of the support assembly 24 which causes laterally downward rolling of the support assembly 24. This laterally downward rolling of the support assembly 24 causes the rear wheels 56 to turn in an opposite direction. In this manner, the operator 16, by exerting uneven weighting of the foot support 26, induces lateral rolling thereof which, in turn, effectuates angular yawing or turning of the rear wheels 56. The greater the degree of asymmetric loading of the support assembly 24, the greater the degree of angular yawing (i.e., the smaller the turn radius).
As can be seen in the figures, the handle assembly 32 is located forward of and extends upwardly from the support assembly 24 in a generally vertical orientation. In one embodiment shown in
Referring still to
The strut member 28 is preferably configured such that when riding the scooter 10, the operator's legs straddle the strut member 28. However, the strut member 28 may be altogether eliminated and the chassis 18 provided in the arrangement shown in
Referring to
Additionally, the biasing members 54 is preferably configured to provide a progressively higher degree of stiffness or biasing force at progressively greater yaw angles of the rear wheels 56. The progressively higher stiffness of the biasing members 54 also prevents the support platform from laterally oscillating or wobbling (i.e., from side-to-side) which is important when traveling at high speed. A further benefit provided by the biasing members 54 is a self-standing characteristic when the scooter 10 is stationary or parked such that the handle assembly 32 and front wheel 44 are maintained in a vertical orientation. Overall, the biasing members 54 provides stability to the scooter 10 at low speed as well as at high speed by resisting laterally rolling motion of the support assembly 24.
The biasing members 54 may be configured in a variety of arrangements including, but not limited to, a rubber element or member secured between the support assembly 24 and the trunnion 58 in order to resist relative motion between the rear axle 60 and the support assembly 24. Alternatively, a spring 50 or pair of springs may be inserted between the rear axle 60 and the support assembly 24 in order to resist lateral rolling motion. A spring dampener 52 may be further included with the biasing members 54 in order to reduce the spring 50 rate of the biasing members 54 to further stabilize the scooter 10.
In an alternative embodiment,
b further illustrates a control arm secured to each of the spindles 64 for interconnecting the rear wheels 56 by means of linkage 66 or tie rod. At least one of the spindles 64 may include a steering arm (not shown) attached to one of the rear wheels 56. Pivoting motion provided to one of the rear wheels 56 by the control arm is, in turn, transferred to the other one of the rear wheels 56 by means of the linkage 66. Steering of the scooter 10 may then be effectuated by a foot-actuated or hand-actuated steering mechanism such as a lever (not shown) which induces pivoting motion at the control arm and, which is then transferred to the rear wheels 56.
Referring briefly to
As shown in
Referring to
Although handle assembly 32 appears similar to conventional handlebars, it should be emphasized that the front wheel 44 is non-pivotally secured to the chassis 18 and therefore provides no steering capability as conventionally exists in a bicycle. In this regard, steering of the scooter 10 is effectuated primarily and solely by angular yawing of the rear wheels 56 in response to lateral rolling of the support assembly 24 as a result of weight shifting and/or as a result of lateral motion of the handle assembly 32 from side-to-side. The handle assembly 32 are preferably located at a height suitable for convenient grasping by the operator 16 in the standing or sitting position. It is contemplated that a height adjustment feature may be included in the handle assembly 32 in order to accommodate riders of different sizes. Furthermore, the lateral extending arm members 34 may be provided in an interchangeable configuration in order to allow mounting of handle assemblies of differing widths, shapes and/or angular orientation.
Referring briefly to
To facilitate pivoting of the perch post 74, the scooter 10 may further include a slotted brace 76 having a slot with a detent at one end thereof and which is configured to engage a pin mounted to the support assembly 24, as shown in
Referring briefly to
The articulated joint 30 provides a means by which the operator 16 may propel the bicycle skateboard by laterally rolling the foot support 26 (i.e., due to asymmetric loading thereof) out-of-phase with the handle assembly 32. Propulsive force may thereby be generated which then translates into forward motion of the scooter 10. The articulated joint 30 may further include a biasing means such as a coil spring 50 and/or dampening means in order to bias the support assembly 24 and handle assembly 32 into neutral alignment and which facilitates the out-of-phase motion of the support assembly 24 relative to the handle assembly 32. Such an arrangement also provides a self-steering characteristic to the scooter 10 as well as a self-standing feature during periods of non-use of the scooter 10. The biasing means further provides rolling resistance to the support assembly 24 relative to the handle assembly 32 and thereby stabilize the scooter 10 at low speeds.
Referring still to
Referring briefly to
Regulation of the motor 82 may be facilitated through the use of a throttle 40 which may be mounted on the handle assembly 32 as shown in
Referring to
Regarding the geometric relationship of the various components of the scooter 10, the front wheel 44 is preferably a pneumatic wheel of relatively large diameter (e.g., 12 inch-28 inch) and preferably having a tire tread of a width generally less than about 2 inches although wider tires are contemplated. The cross sectional geometry of the tire tread itself is preferably radiused to facilitate lateral rolling motion of the front wheel 44. The diameter of the front wheel 44 is preferably between about 6-10 times the diameter of the rear wheels 56. The rear wheels 56 each preferably have a width generally equal to the diameter of the rear wheels 56 although various other width/diameter ratios are contemplated. The rear wheels 56 also preferably have a generally flat or planar tread surface in order to maximize lateral traction during turning.
As was indicated earlier, steering of the scooter 10 is facilitated by angular yawing of the rear wheels 56 in response to asymmetric loading or weighting of the support assembly 24 by the operator 16. By exerting uneven loading on the foot support 26, lateral rolling motion of the support assembly 24 and handle assembly 32 to which the front wheel 44 is connected results in angular yawing or turning of the rear wheels 56. The greater the amount of lateral rolling of the chassis 18 or support assembly 24, the greater the angular yawing movement at the rear wheels 56 which results in a relatively tighter turning radius of the scooter 10.
Because the collective area of the contact patch of the rear wheels 56 are greater than the contact patch at the front wheel 44, steering of the scooter 10 is achieved primarily as a result of angular yawing or turning displacement of the rear wheels 56 in relation to the longitudinal axis A. Traction of the rear wheels 56 may be maximized by optimizing the degree of compliancy of the rear wheels 56 relative to the amount of lateral roll of the support assembly 24. In this manner, the rear wheels 56 can remain in contact with the ground during steering of the scooter 10 regardless of the yaw angle of the rear wheels 56.
The scooter 10 may further be provided with additional accessories or features. For example, as shown in
In operation, the scooter 10 may be propelled in a forward direction by a variety of different modes including the operator 16 simply pushing in an aftward direction such as with the operator's foot. As was earlier described, the scooter 10 may further be propelled in a forward direction by laterally rolling the front wheel 44 out-of-phase with lateral rolling of the support assembly 24. Energy generated during such out-of-phase motion facilitates forward propulsion of the scooter 10. Forward propulsion of the scooter 10 may further be provided by an electric motor 82 imparting rotational motion to at least one of the front and/or rear wheels 44, 56. Regulation of the motor 82 may be facilitated by a throttle 40 which may be mounted to the handle assembly 32 as shown in
The above description is given by way of example and not limitation. Given the above disclosure, one skilled in the art could devise variations that are within the scope and spirit of the invention disclosed herein. Furthermore, the various features of the embodiments disclosed herein can be used alone or in varying combinations with each other and are not intended to be limited to the specific combinations described herein. Thus, the scope of the claims is not to be limited by the illustrated embodiments.
This is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/713,947, filed on Mar. 5, 2007, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,540,517, issued on Jun. 2, 2009, the entire content of which is expressly incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
322504 | Thompson | Jul 1885 | A |
329556 | Hirt | Nov 1885 | A |
329557 | Hirt | Nov 1885 | A |
537689 | Kouns | Apr 1895 | A |
638963 | Ganswindt | Dec 1899 | A |
865441 | Slocum | Sep 1907 | A |
1213454 | Brown | Jan 1917 | A |
1342688 | Millward et al. | Jun 1920 | A |
1548973 | Beeler | Aug 1925 | A |
1599223 | Epps | Sep 1926 | A |
1607972 | Wagner | Nov 1926 | A |
2330147 | Rodriguez | Sep 1943 | A |
3203706 | Boyden | Aug 1965 | A |
D206334 | Ryan | Nov 1966 | S |
3284096 | Hansen et al. | Nov 1966 | A |
3392991 | Ryan et al. | Jul 1968 | A |
3442528 | Rademacher | May 1969 | A |
3652101 | Pivonka | Mar 1972 | A |
3860264 | Douglas et al. | Jan 1975 | A |
3891225 | Sessa | Jun 1975 | A |
3992029 | Washizawa et al. | Nov 1976 | A |
4047725 | Pinchock | Sep 1977 | A |
4061351 | Bangle | Dec 1977 | A |
4082307 | Tait | Apr 1978 | A |
4103921 | Brooks et al. | Aug 1978 | A |
4194752 | Tilch | Mar 1980 | A |
4198072 | Hopkins | Apr 1980 | A |
4359231 | Mulcahy | Nov 1982 | A |
4469343 | Weatherford | Sep 1984 | A |
4526390 | Skolnik | Jul 1985 | A |
4624469 | Bourne, Jr. | Nov 1986 | A |
4657272 | Davenport | Apr 1987 | A |
D289985 | Davenport | May 1987 | S |
D295428 | Cummings | Apr 1988 | S |
D295989 | Cummings | May 1988 | S |
D300756 | Cummings | Apr 1989 | S |
4863182 | Chern | Sep 1989 | A |
5046747 | Nielsen, Jr. | Sep 1991 | A |
5127488 | Shanahan | Jul 1992 | A |
5551717 | De Courcey Milne | Sep 1996 | A |
5620189 | Hinderhofer | Apr 1997 | A |
5853182 | Finkle | Dec 1998 | A |
5931738 | Robb | Aug 1999 | A |
6220612 | Beleski, Jr. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
D444184 | Kettler | Jun 2001 | S |
6250656 | Ibarra | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6315304 | Kirkland et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6318739 | Fehn | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6467781 | Feng | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6523837 | Kirkland | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6572130 | Greene et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6715779 | Eschenbach | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6942235 | Chang | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7007957 | Lee | Mar 2006 | B1 |
20050116430 | Chen | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050139406 | McLeese | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060042844 | Kirkpatrick | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060049595 | Crigler et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20090066150 | O'Rourke, Sr. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
610642 | May 1991 | AU |
2501789 | Jul 2002 | CN |
4424297 | Jan 1996 | DE |
2859111 | Mar 2005 | FR |
2859166 | Mar 2005 | FR |
2225990 | Jun 1990 | GB |
6254200 | Sep 1994 | JP |
10211313 | Aug 1998 | JP |
2006151032 | Jun 2006 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100225088 A1 | Sep 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11713947 | Mar 2007 | US |
Child | 12397145 | US |